For art's sake! Artistic and economic logics in creative production
Identifieur interne : 001773 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001772; suivant : 001774For art's sake! Artistic and economic logics in creative production
Auteurs : Doris Ruth Eikhof ; Axel HaunschildSource :
- Journal of Organizational Behavior [ 0894-3796 ] ; 2007-07.
Abstract
In creative or cultural production, work practices are shaped by both artistic and economic logics of practice. We apply a practice theory‐framework to qualitative research in German theatres and analyse (i) the nature of the relationship between artistic and economic logics of practice and (ii) how art and business as reference points influence creative production. Exploring logics of practice in theatre reveals a central paradox of creative production: economic logics tend to crowd out artistic logics, and thus endanger the resources vital to creative production. Consequently theatre actors and theatres, as organisations, have to develop means of safeguarding artistic logics of practice in order to delimit the influence of economic logics. The article shows that despite of this need, no respective organizational routines have emerged. Rather, human resource management practices in theatres are highly personalized and theatre artists have to find their own, idiosyncratic ways of dealing with the tension between artistic and economic logics. We argue that the central paradox in creative production, which is caused by the necessity to manage and market habitually incorporated non‐economic norms and values, is also of crucial relevance for other, especially knowledge‐intensive industries. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Url:
DOI: 10.1002/job.462
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:445E390B87C640CFDDDEAAD42915677F552F1834Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">For art's sake! Artistic and economic logics in creative production</title><author><name sortKey="Eikhof, Doris Ruth" sort="Eikhof, Doris Ruth" uniqKey="Eikhof D" first="Doris Ruth" last="Eikhof">Doris Ruth Eikhof</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Stirling, Scotland, U.K.</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Management and Organization, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland, U.K.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Haunschild, Axel" sort="Haunschild, Axel" uniqKey="Haunschild A" first="Axel" last="Haunschild">Axel Haunschild</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Trier, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:445E390B87C640CFDDDEAAD42915677F552F1834</idno><date when="2007" year="2007">2007</date><idno type="doi">10.1002/job.462</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/445E390B87C640CFDDDEAAD42915677F552F1834/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001773</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001773</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">For art's sake! Artistic and economic logics in creative production</title><author><name sortKey="Eikhof, Doris Ruth" sort="Eikhof, Doris Ruth" uniqKey="Eikhof D" first="Doris Ruth" last="Eikhof">Doris Ruth Eikhof</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Stirling, Scotland, U.K.</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Management and Organization, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland, U.K.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Haunschild, Axel" sort="Haunschild, Axel" uniqKey="Haunschild A" first="Axel" last="Haunschild">Axel Haunschild</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Trier, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Journal of Organizational Behavior</title><title level="j" type="sub">The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">J. Organiz. Behav.</title><idno type="ISSN">0894-3796</idno><idno type="eISSN">1099-1379</idno><imprint><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><pubPlace>Chichester, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2007-07">2007-07</date><biblScope unit="volume">28</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="523">523</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="538">538</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0894-3796</idno></series><idno type="istex">445E390B87C640CFDDDEAAD42915677F552F1834</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/job.462</idno><idno type="ArticleID">JOB462</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0894-3796</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">In creative or cultural production, work practices are shaped by both artistic and economic logics of practice. We apply a practice theory‐framework to qualitative research in German theatres and analyse (i) the nature of the relationship between artistic and economic logics of practice and (ii) how art and business as reference points influence creative production. Exploring logics of practice in theatre reveals a central paradox of creative production: economic logics tend to crowd out artistic logics, and thus endanger the resources vital to creative production. Consequently theatre actors and theatres, as organisations, have to develop means of safeguarding artistic logics of practice in order to delimit the influence of economic logics. The article shows that despite of this need, no respective organizational routines have emerged. Rather, human resource management practices in theatres are highly personalized and theatre artists have to find their own, idiosyncratic ways of dealing with the tension between artistic and economic logics. We argue that the central paradox in creative production, which is caused by the necessity to manage and market habitually incorporated non‐economic norms and values, is also of crucial relevance for other, especially knowledge‐intensive industries. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Doris Ruth Eikhof</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Stirling, Scotland, U.K.</json:string><json:string>Department of Management and Organization, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland, U.K.</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Axel Haunschild</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Trier, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>JOB462</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>In creative or cultural production, work practices are shaped by both artistic and economic logics of practice. We apply a practice theory‐framework to qualitative research in German theatres and analyse (i) the nature of the relationship between artistic and economic logics of practice and (ii) how art and business as reference points influence creative production. Exploring logics of practice in theatre reveals a central paradox of creative production: economic logics tend to crowd out artistic logics, and thus endanger the resources vital to creative production. Consequently theatre actors and theatres, as organisations, have to develop means of safeguarding artistic logics of practice in order to delimit the influence of economic logics. The article shows that despite of this need, no respective organizational routines have emerged. Rather, human resource management practices in theatres are highly personalized and theatre artists have to find their own, idiosyncratic ways of dealing with the tension between artistic and economic logics. We argue that the central paradox in creative production, which is caused by the necessity to manage and market habitually incorporated non‐economic norms and values, is also of crucial relevance for other, especially knowledge‐intensive industries. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.376</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>564 x 740 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>1348</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>9238</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>57249</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>16</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>198</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>For art's sake! Artistic and economic logics in creative production</title><refBibs><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. L. Alvarez</name></json:item><json:item><name>C. Mazza</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Strandgaard Pedersen</name></json:item><json:item><name>S Svejenova</name></json:item></author><host><volume>12</volume><pages><last>888</last><first>863</first></pages><author></author><title>Organization</title></host><title>Shielding idiosyncrasy from isomorphic pressures: Towards optimal distinctiveness in European film making</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Arthur, M. B., Rousseau D. M. (Eds.). (1996). The boundaryless career: A new employment principle for a new organizational era. New York: Oxford University Press.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>H Blair</name></json:item></author><host><volume>15</volume><pages><last>169</last><first>149</first></pages><author></author><title>Work, Employment & Society</title></host><title>You're only as good as your last job: The labour process and labour market in the British film industry</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Boltanski, L., Chiapello, E. (2003). Der neue Geist des Kapitalismus. Konstanz: UVK Verlagsgesellschaft.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>P Bourdieu</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>198</last><first>83</first></pages><author></author><title>Soziale Ungleichheiten</title></host><title>Ökonomisches Kapital, kulturelles Kapital, soziales Kapital</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production. Essays on art and literature. New York: Columbia University Press.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Bourdieu, P. (1999). Die Regeln der Kunst. Genese und Struktur des literarischen Feldes. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Brooks, D. (2000). Bobos in paradise. New York: Simon & Schuster.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>P Cappelli</name></json:item></author><host><volume>33</volume><pages><last>602</last><first>563</first></pages><author></author><title>British Journal of Industrial Relations</title></host><title>Rethinking employment</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Carnoy</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Castells</name></json:item><json:item><name>C Benner</name></json:item></author><host><volume>136</volume><pages><last>48</last><first>27</first></pages><author></author><title>International Labour Review</title></host><title>Labour markets and employment practices in the age of flexibility: A case study of Silicon Valley</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Caves, R. E. (2000). Creative industries: Contracts between arts and commerce. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>S. Christopherson</name></json:item><json:item><name>M Storper</name></json:item></author><host><volume>42</volume><pages><last>347</last><first>331</first></pages><author></author><title>Industrial and Labor Relations Review</title></host><title>The effects of flexible specialization on industrial politics and the labor market: The motion picture industry</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Davis, H., Scase, R. (2000). Managing creativity: The dynamics of work and organization. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. J. DeFillippi</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. B Arthur</name></json:item></author><host><volume>40</volume><pages><last>139</last><first>125</first></pages><author></author><title>California Management Review</title></host><title>Paradox in project‐based enterprise</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Theaterstatistik 2002/2003</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Pierre Bourdieus Theorie der Praxis als praxeologische Theorie der Arbeitswelt</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D. R. Eikhof</name></json:item><json:item><name>A Haunschild</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>113</last><first>93</first></pages><author></author><title>Typisch Arbeitskraftunternehmer? Befunde der empirischen Arbeitsforschung</title></host><title>Arbeitskraftunternehmer in der Kulturindustrie. Ein Forschungsbericht über die Arbeitswelt Theater</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D. R. Eikhof</name></json:item><json:item><name>A Haunschild</name></json:item></author><host><volume>13</volume><pages><last>241</last><first>234</first></pages><author></author><title>Creativity and Innovation Management</title></host><title>Lifestyle meets market. Bohemian entrepreneurs in creative industries</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. R. Faulkner</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. B Anderson</name></json:item></author><host><volume>92</volume><pages><last>909</last><first>879</first></pages><author></author><title>American Journal of Sociology</title></host><title>Short‐term projects and emergent careers: Evidence from Hollywood</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>T Fenwick</name></json:item></author><host><volume>16</volume><pages><last>723</last><first>703</first></pages><author></author><title>Work Employment and Society</title></host><title>Transgressive desires: New enterprising selves in the new capitalism</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class: And how it's transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Basic Books.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Frey, B. S. (1997). Not just for the money: An economic theory of personal motivation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G Grabher</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>262</last><first>245</first></pages><author></author><title>Production in projects: Economic geographies of temporary collaboration</title></host><title>The project ecology of advertising: Tasks, talents, and teams</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D. T. Hall</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. H Mirvis</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>45</last><first>15</first></pages><author></author><title>The career is dead—long live the career</title></host><title>The new protean career: Psychological success and the path with a heart</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>A Haunschild</name></json:item></author><host><volume>56</volume><pages><last>929</last><first>899</first></pages><author></author><title>Human Relations</title></host><title>Managing employment relationships in flexible labour markets: The case of German repertory theatres</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>A Haunschild</name></json:item></author><host><volume>42</volume><pages><last>703</last><first>685</first></pages><author></author><title>British Journal of Industrial Relations</title></host><title>Employment rules in German theatres: An application and evaluation of the theory of employment systems</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Howkins, G. (2001). The creative economy How people make money from ideas. London: Penguin.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>P. Jeffcutt</name></json:item><json:item><name>A Pratt</name></json:item></author><host><volume>11</volume><pages><last>233</last><first>225</first></pages><author></author><title>Creativity and Innovation Management</title></host><title>Managing creativity in the cultural industries</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C. Jones</name></json:item><json:item><name>K Walsh</name></json:item></author><host><volume>4</volume><pages><last>73</last><first>58</first></pages><author></author><title>Industrielle Beziehungen</title></host><title>Boundaryless careers in the US film industry Understanding labor market dynamics of network organizations</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C Jones</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>228</last><first>209</first></pages><author></author><title>Career creativity. Explorations in the remaking of work</title></host><title>Signaling expertise: How signals shape careers in creative industries</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. M Kanter</name></json:item></author><host><volume>Fall</volume><pages><last>58</last><first>52</first></pages><author></author><title>The American Prospect</title></host><title>Nice work if you can get it. The software industry as a model for tomorrow's jobs</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>P.‐M Menger</name></json:item></author><host><volume>25</volume><pages><last>574</last><first>541</first></pages><author></author><title>Annual Review of Sociology</title></host><title>Artistic labor markets and careers</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Moldaschl, M., Voß, G. G. (Eds.). (2002). Subjektivierung von Arbeit. München and Mering: Hampp.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>de Monthoux, P. (2004). The art firm: Aesthetic management and metaphysical marketing from Wagner to Wilson. Standford, CA: Stanford University Press.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Öffentliche Trägerschaft—aber wie?. Die Deutsche Bühne</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Pongratz, H. J., Voß, G. G. (Eds.). (2004). Typisch Arbeitskraftunternehmer? Befunde der empirischen Arbeitsforschung. Berlin: Sigma.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Creative Labour: Content, contract and control</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. Storey</name></json:item><json:item><name>G. Salaman</name></json:item><json:item><name>K Platman</name></json:item></author><host><volume>58</volume><pages><last>1054</last><first>1033</first></pages><author></author><title>Human Relations</title></host><title>Living with enterprise in an enterprise economy: Freelance and contract workers in the media</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R Sutton</name></json:item></author><host><volume>79</volume><pages><last>103</last><first>94</first></pages><author></author><title>Harvard Business Review</title></host><title>The weird rules of creativity</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. Sydow</name></json:item><json:item><name>U Staber</name></json:item></author><host><volume>36</volume><pages><last>227</last><first>215</first></pages><author></author><title>Regional Studies</title></host><title>The institutional embeddedness of project networks: The case of content production in German television</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Throsby, D. (2001). Economics and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Vester, M., von Oertzen, P., Geiling, H., Hermann, T., Müller, D. (2001). Soziale Milieus im gesellschaftlichen Strukturwandel. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Waidelich, J.‐D. (1991). Theatermanagement/Theaterorganisation. Hagen: 2 Bände, Fernuniversität.</title></host></json:item></refBibs><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>28</volume><publisherId><json:string>JOB</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>16</total><last>538</last><first>523</first></pages><issn><json:string>0894-3796</json:string></issn><issue>5</issue><author><json:item><name>Robert DeFillippi</name><affiliations><json:string>Management Department, Sawyer Business School, Suffolk University, 8 Ashburton Place, Boston, MA 02108‐2770, U.S.A.</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Gernot Grabher</name><affiliations><json:string>Socio‐Economics of Space, University of Bonn, Meckenheimer Allee, 166, D‐53115 Bonn, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Candace Jones</name><affiliations><json:string>Organization Studies Department, Boston College, 140 Commonwealth Avenue, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, U.S.A.</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><value>Research Article</value></json:item></subject><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1099-1379</json:string></eissn><title>Journal of Organizational Behavior</title><doi><json:string>10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379</json:string></doi></host><categories><wos><json:string>social science</json:string><json:string>psychology, applied</json:string><json:string>management</json:string><json:string>business</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>economic & social sciences</json:string><json:string>economics & business </json:string><json:string>business & management</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>2007</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2007</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1002/job.462</json:string></doi><id>445E390B87C640CFDDDEAAD42915677F552F1834</id><score>0.8063714</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/445E390B87C640CFDDDEAAD42915677F552F1834/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/445E390B87C640CFDDDEAAD42915677F552F1834/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/445E390B87C640CFDDDEAAD42915677F552F1834/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">For art's sake! Artistic and economic logics in creative production</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><pubPlace>Chichester, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p></availability><date>2007</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">For art's sake! Artistic and economic logics in creative production</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Doris Ruth</forename><surname>Eikhof</surname></persName><affiliation>University of Stirling, Scotland, U.K.</affiliation><affiliation>Department of Management and Organization, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland, U.K.</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">Axel</forename><surname>Haunschild</surname></persName><affiliation>University of Trier, Germany</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Journal of Organizational Behavior</title><title level="j" type="sub">The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">J. Organiz. Behav.</title><idno type="pISSN">0894-3796</idno><idno type="eISSN">1099-1379</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379</idno><imprint><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><pubPlace>Chichester, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2007-07"></date><biblScope unit="volume">28</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="523">523</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="538">538</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">445E390B87C640CFDDDEAAD42915677F552F1834</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/job.462</idno><idno type="ArticleID">JOB462</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2007</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>In creative or cultural production, work practices are shaped by both artistic and economic logics of practice. We apply a practice theory‐framework to qualitative research in German theatres and analyse (i) the nature of the relationship between artistic and economic logics of practice and (ii) how art and business as reference points influence creative production. Exploring logics of practice in theatre reveals a central paradox of creative production: economic logics tend to crowd out artistic logics, and thus endanger the resources vital to creative production. Consequently theatre actors and theatres, as organisations, have to develop means of safeguarding artistic logics of practice in order to delimit the influence of economic logics. The article shows that despite of this need, no respective organizational routines have emerged. Rather, human resource management practices in theatres are highly personalized and theatre artists have to find their own, idiosyncratic ways of dealing with the tension between artistic and economic logics. We argue that the central paradox in creative production, which is caused by the necessity to manage and market habitually incorporated non‐economic norms and values, is also of crucial relevance for other, especially knowledge‐intensive industries. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="Journal Subject"><list><head>article-category</head><item><term>Research Article</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2007-07">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/445E390B87C640CFDDDEAAD42915677F552F1834/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisherName><publisherLoc>Chichester, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi registered="yes">10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379</doi><issn type="print">0894-3796</issn><issn type="electronic">1099-1379</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JOB"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" xml:lang="en" sort="JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR">Journal of Organizational Behavior</title><title type="subtitle">The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior</title><title type="short">J. Organiz. Behav.</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="50"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1002/job.v28:5</doi><titleGroup><title type="specialIssueTitle">Paradoxes of Creativity: Managerial and Organizational Challenges in the Cultural Economy</title></titleGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="28">28</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">5</numbering></numberingGroup><creators><creator xml:id="sped1" creatorRole="sponsoringEditor" affiliationRef="#sp1"><personName><givenNames>Robert</givenNames><familyName>DeFillippi</familyName></personName></creator><creator xml:id="sped2" creatorRole="sponsoringEditor" affiliationRef="#sp2"><personName><givenNames>Gernot</givenNames><familyName>Grabher</familyName></personName></creator><creator xml:id="sped3" creatorRole="sponsoringEditor" affiliationRef="#sp3"><personName><givenNames>Candace</givenNames><familyName>Jones</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="sp1" countryCode="US" type="organization"><unparsedAffiliation>Management Department, Sawyer Business School, Suffolk University, 8 Ashburton Place, Boston, MA 02108‐2770, U.S.A.</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="sp2" countryCode="DE" type="organization"><unparsedAffiliation>Socio‐Economics of Space, University of Bonn, Meckenheimer Allee, 166, D‐53115 Bonn, Germany</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="sp3" countryCode="US" type="organization"><unparsedAffiliation>Organization Studies Department, Boston College, 140 Commonwealth Avenue, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, U.S.A.</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><coverDate startDate="2007-07">July 2007</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="20" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1002/job.462</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JOB462"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="16"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Research Article</title><title type="tocHeading1">Research Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2007-06-11"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2007-06-11"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:JWSART34_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-03-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-31"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-30"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">523</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">538</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Department of Management and Organization, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland, U.K.</correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JOB.JOB462.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="45"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" xml:lang="en">For art's sake! Artistic and economic logics in creative production</title><title type="short" xml:lang="en">LOGICS IN CREATIVE PRODUCTION</title></titleGroup><creators><creator xml:id="au1" creatorRole="author" affiliationRef="#af1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Doris Ruth</givenNames><familyName>Eikhof</familyName></personName><contactDetails><email>d.r.eikhof@stir.ac.uk</email></contactDetails></creator><creator xml:id="au2" creatorRole="author" affiliationRef="#af2"><personName><givenNames>Axel</givenNames><familyName>Haunschild</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="af1" countryCode="GB" type="organization"><unparsedAffiliation>University of Stirling, Scotland, U.K.</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="af2" countryCode="DE" type="organization"><unparsedAffiliation>University of Trier, Germany</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p>In creative or cultural production, work practices are shaped by both artistic and economic logics of practice. We apply a practice theory‐framework to qualitative research in German theatres and analyse (i) the nature of the relationship between artistic and economic logics of practice and (ii) how art and business as reference points influence creative production. Exploring logics of practice in theatre reveals a central paradox of creative production: economic logics tend to crowd out artistic logics, and thus endanger the resources vital to creative production. Consequently theatre actors and theatres, as organisations, have to develop means of safeguarding artistic logics of practice in order to delimit the influence of economic logics. The article shows that despite of this need, no respective organizational routines have emerged. Rather, human resource management practices in theatres are highly personalized and theatre artists have to find their own, idiosyncratic ways of dealing with the tension between artistic and economic logics. We argue that the central paradox in creative production, which is caused by the necessity to manage and market habitually incorporated non‐economic norms and values, is also of crucial relevance for other, especially knowledge‐intensive industries. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>For art's sake! Artistic and economic logics in creative production</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>LOGICS IN CREATIVE PRODUCTION</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>For art's sake! Artistic and economic logics in creative production</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Doris Ruth</namePart><namePart type="family">Eikhof</namePart><affiliation>University of Stirling, Scotland, U.K.</affiliation><affiliation>Department of Management and Organization, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland, U.K.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Axel</namePart><namePart type="family">Haunschild</namePart><affiliation>University of Trier, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Chichester, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2007-07</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2007</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="references">45</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">In creative or cultural production, work practices are shaped by both artistic and economic logics of practice. We apply a practice theory‐framework to qualitative research in German theatres and analyse (i) the nature of the relationship between artistic and economic logics of practice and (ii) how art and business as reference points influence creative production. Exploring logics of practice in theatre reveals a central paradox of creative production: economic logics tend to crowd out artistic logics, and thus endanger the resources vital to creative production. Consequently theatre actors and theatres, as organisations, have to develop means of safeguarding artistic logics of practice in order to delimit the influence of economic logics. The article shows that despite of this need, no respective organizational routines have emerged. Rather, human resource management practices in theatres are highly personalized and theatre artists have to find their own, idiosyncratic ways of dealing with the tension between artistic and economic logics. We argue that the central paradox in creative production, which is caused by the necessity to manage and market habitually incorporated non‐economic norms and values, is also of crucial relevance for other, especially knowledge‐intensive industries. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Organizational Behavior</title><subTitle>The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior</subTitle></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>J. Organiz. Behav.</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Robert</namePart><namePart type="family">DeFillippi</namePart><affiliation>Management Department, Sawyer Business School, Suffolk University, 8 Ashburton Place, Boston, MA 02108‐2770, U.S.A.</affiliation></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Gernot</namePart><namePart type="family">Grabher</namePart><affiliation>Socio‐Economics of Space, University of Bonn, Meckenheimer Allee, 166, D‐53115 Bonn, Germany</affiliation></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Candace</namePart><namePart type="family">Jones</namePart><affiliation>Organization Studies Department, Boston College, 140 Commonwealth Avenue, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, U.S.A.</affiliation></name><genre type="journal">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Research Article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0894-3796</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1099-1379</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JOB</identifier><part><date>2007</date><detail type="title"><title>Paradoxes of Creativity: Managerial and Organizational Challenges in the Cultural Economy</title></detail><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>28</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>5</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>523</start><end>538</end><total>16</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">445E390B87C640CFDDDEAAD42915677F552F1834</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1002/job.462</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JOB462</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Rhénanie/explor/UnivTrevesV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001773 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001773 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Rhénanie
|area= UnivTrevesV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:445E390B87C640CFDDDEAAD42915677F552F1834
|texte= For art's sake! Artistic and economic logics in creative production
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |