Compatibility between approach/avoidance stimulation and valenced information determines residual attention during the process of encoding
Identifieur interne : 001481 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001480; suivant : 001482Compatibility between approach/avoidance stimulation and valenced information determines residual attention during the process of encoding
Auteurs : Jens Förster ; Sabine StepperSource :
- European Journal of Social Psychology [ 0046-2772 ] ; 2000-11.
Abstract
We tested the hypothesis that the activation of the motivational systems of approach or avoidance by body postures and taste influences residual attention during the process of encoding differentially valenced words. In Experiment 1, participants were asked to stand upright or kneel while learning either positive or negative adjectives. To measure participants' differential cognitive capacities, a dual task paradigm was used, including a finger‐dexterity test as a secondary task. We were able to show that participants performed worse on the secondary task compared to a baseline assessed before if there was incompatibility between postures and the valence of the information. In Experiment 2, we replicated the results with bitter and sweet taste instead of body positions. It is our contention that the activation of approach or avoidance systems by bodily states prepares the organism for information of differential valence. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Url:
DOI: 10.1002/1099-0992(200011/12)30:6<853::AID-EJSP20>3.0.CO;2-1
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:DD547F24E45C6C29CEC0CF48FB5A97C23429C67BLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Compatibility between approach/avoidance stimulation and valenced information determines residual attention during the process of encoding</title><author><name sortKey="Forster, Jens" sort="Forster, Jens" uniqKey="Forster J" first="Jens" last="Förster">Jens Förster</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Würzburg, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Jens Förster, Department of Psychology, Lehrstuhl für Psychologie II, Röntgenring 10, D‐9707 Würzburg, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Stepper, Sabine" sort="Stepper, Sabine" uniqKey="Stepper S" first="Sabine" last="Stepper">Sabine Stepper</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Würzburg, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:DD547F24E45C6C29CEC0CF48FB5A97C23429C67B</idno><date when="2000" year="2000">2000</date><idno type="doi">10.1002/1099-0992(200011/12)30:6<853::AID-EJSP20>3.0.CO;2-1</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/DD547F24E45C6C29CEC0CF48FB5A97C23429C67B/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001481</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001481</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Compatibility between approach/avoidance stimulation and valenced information determines residual attention during the process of encoding</title><author><name sortKey="Forster, Jens" sort="Forster, Jens" uniqKey="Forster J" first="Jens" last="Förster">Jens Förster</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Würzburg, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Jens Förster, Department of Psychology, Lehrstuhl für Psychologie II, Röntgenring 10, D‐9707 Würzburg, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Stepper, Sabine" sort="Stepper, Sabine" uniqKey="Stepper S" first="Sabine" last="Stepper">Sabine Stepper</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Würzburg, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">European Journal of Social Psychology</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Eur. J. Soc. Psychol.</title><idno type="ISSN">0046-2772</idno><idno type="eISSN">1099-0992</idno><imprint><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><pubPlace>Chichester, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2000-11">2000-11</date><biblScope unit="volume">30</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="853">853</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="871">871</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0046-2772</idno></series><idno type="istex">DD547F24E45C6C29CEC0CF48FB5A97C23429C67B</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/1099-0992(200011/12)30:6<853::AID-EJSP20>3.0.CO;2-1</idno><idno type="ArticleID">EJSP20</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0046-2772</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">We tested the hypothesis that the activation of the motivational systems of approach or avoidance by body postures and taste influences residual attention during the process of encoding differentially valenced words. In Experiment 1, participants were asked to stand upright or kneel while learning either positive or negative adjectives. To measure participants' differential cognitive capacities, a dual task paradigm was used, including a finger‐dexterity test as a secondary task. We were able to show that participants performed worse on the secondary task compared to a baseline assessed before if there was incompatibility between postures and the valence of the information. In Experiment 2, we replicated the results with bitter and sweet taste instead of body positions. It is our contention that the activation of approach or avoidance systems by bodily states prepares the organism for information of differential valence. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Jens Förster</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Würzburg, Germany</json:string><json:string>Jens Förster, Department of Psychology, Lehrstuhl für Psychologie II, Röntgenring 10, D‐9707 Würzburg, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Sabine Stepper</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Würzburg, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>EJSP20</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>We tested the hypothesis that the activation of the motivational systems of approach or avoidance by body postures and taste influences residual attention during the process of encoding differentially valenced words. In Experiment 1, participants were asked to stand upright or kneel while learning either positive or negative adjectives. To measure participants' differential cognitive capacities, a dual task paradigm was used, including a finger‐dexterity test as a secondary task. We were able to show that participants performed worse on the secondary task compared to a baseline assessed before if there was incompatibility between postures and the valence of the information. In Experiment 2, we replicated the results with bitter and sweet taste instead of body positions. It is our contention that the activation of approach or avoidance systems by bodily states prepares the organism for information of differential valence. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.764</score><pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>468 x 703 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>975</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>8440</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>52768</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>19</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>147</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Compatibility between approach/avoidance stimulation and valenced information determines residual attention during the process of encoding</title><refBibs><json:item><author><json:item><name>PK Adelman</name></json:item><json:item><name>RB Zajonc</name></json:item></author><host><volume>40</volume><pages><last>280</last><first>249</first></pages><author></author><title>Annual Review of Psychology</title></host><title>Facial efference and the experience of emotion</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>EA Allusi</name></json:item><json:item><name>JS Warm</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>30</last><first>3</first></pages><author></author><title>Stimulus‐response Compatibility: An integrated perspective</title></host><title>Things that go together: A review of stimulus–response compatibility and related effects</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J Bargh</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>61</last><first>1</first></pages><author></author><title>Advances in Social Cognition</title></host><title>The automaticity in everyday life</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>JA Bargh</name></json:item><json:item><name>K Barndollar</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>481</last><first>457</first></pages><author></author><title>The Psychology of Action: Linking Cognition and Motivation to Behavior</title></host><title>Automaticity in action: The unconscious as repository of chronic goals and motives</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>JA Bargh</name></json:item><json:item><name>S Chaiken</name></json:item><json:item><name>R Govender</name></json:item><json:item><name>F Pratto</name></json:item></author><host><volume>62</volume><pages><last>912</last><first>893</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>The generality of the automatic attitude effect</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>JA Bargh</name></json:item><json:item><name>S Chaiken</name></json:item><json:item><name>P Raymond</name></json:item><json:item><name>C Hymes</name></json:item></author><host><volume>32</volume><pages><last>128</last><first>104</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Experimental Social Psychology</title></host><title>The automatic evaluation effect: Unconditional automatic attitude activation with a pronounciation task</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>JA Bargh</name></json:item><json:item><name>PM Gollwitzer</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>124</last><first>71</first></pages><author></author><title>Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Integrative Views of Motivation, Cognition, and Emotion</title></host><title>Environmental control of goal‐directed action: Automatic and strategic contingencies between situations and behavior</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>LM Bartoshuk</name></json:item><json:item><name>GK Beauchamp</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>449</last><first>419</first></pages><author></author><title>Annual Review of Psychology</title></host><title>Chemical senses</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>DJ Bem</name></json:item></author><host><volume>3</volume><pages><last>710</last><first>707</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>Inducing belief in false confessions</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>DJ Bem</name></json:item></author><host><volume>74</volume><pages><last>200</last><first>183</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychological Review</title></host><title>Self‐perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>JT Cacioppo</name></json:item><json:item><name>JR Petty</name></json:item></author><host><volume>37</volume><pages><last>498</last><first>489</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>Effects of message repetition and position on cognitive response, recall, and persuasion</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>JT Cacioppo</name></json:item><json:item><name>JR Priester</name></json:item><json:item><name>GG Berntson</name></json:item></author><host><volume>65</volume><pages><last>17</last><first>5</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>Rudimentary determinants of attitudes. II: Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M Chen</name></json:item><json:item><name>JA Bargh</name></json:item></author><host><volume>25</volume><pages><last>224</last><first>215</first></pages><author></author><title>Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin</title></host><title>An automatic effect of (all) attitudes on behavior: Preconsious approach and avoidance responses to liked and disliked stimuli</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>JA Desor</name></json:item><json:item><name>O Maller</name></json:item><json:item><name>RE Turner</name></json:item></author><host><volume>84</volume><pages><last>501</last><first>496</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology</title></host><title>Taste in acceptance of sugars by human infants</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>P Ekman</name></json:item></author><host><volume>99</volume><pages><last>553</last><first>550</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychological Review</title></host><title>Are there basic emotions?</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Förster J. 1995. Der Einfluß von Ausdrucksverhalten auf das menschliche Gedächtnis. Holos‐Verlag: Bonn, Germany.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J Förster</name></json:item></author><host><volume>45</volume><pages><last>182</last><first>167</first></pages><author></author><title>Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie</title></host><title>Der Einfluß motorischer Perzeptionen auf Sympathie‐Urteile attraktiver und unattraktiver Portraits</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J Förster</name></json:item><json:item><name>ET Higgins</name></json:item><json:item><name>LC Idson</name></json:item></author><host><volume>75</volume><pages><last>1131</last><first>1115</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>Approach and avoidance strength during goal attainment: regulatory focus and the ‘goal looms larger effect’</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J Förster</name></json:item><json:item><name>F Strack</name></json:item></author><host><volume>71</volume><pages><last>430</last><first>421</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>The influence of overt head movements on memory for valenced words: A case of conceptual‐motor compatibility</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J Förster</name></json:item><json:item><name>F Strack</name></json:item></author><host><volume>85</volume><pages><last>1427</last><first>1419</first></pages><author></author><title>Perceptual and Motor Skills</title></host><title>Motor actions in retrieval of valenced information: A motor congruence effect</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J Förster</name></json:item><json:item><name>F Strack</name></json:item></author><host><volume>86</volume><pages><last>1426</last><first>1423</first></pages><author></author><title>Perceptual and Motor Skills</title></host><title>Motor actions in retrieval of valenced information II: Boundary conditions for motor congruence effects</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>NA Fox</name></json:item><json:item><name>RJ Davidson</name></json:item></author><host><volume>24</volume><pages><last>422</last><first>417</first></pages><author></author><title>Neuropsychologia</title></host><title>Taste‐elicited changes in facial signs of emotion and the asymmetry of brain electrical activity in human newborns</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>JR Ganchrow</name></json:item><json:item><name>JE Steiner</name></json:item><json:item><name>M Daher</name></json:item></author><host><volume>6</volume><pages><last>484</last><first>473</first></pages><author></author><title>Infant Behavior and Development</title></host><title>Neonatal facial expressions in response to different qualities and intensities of gustatory stimuli</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>AG Greenwald</name></json:item></author><host><volume>77</volume><pages><last>99</last><first>73</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychological Review</title></host><title>Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: With special reference to the ideo‐motor mechanism</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L Hasher</name></json:item><json:item><name>RT Zacks</name></json:item></author><host><volume>108</volume><pages><last>388</last><first>356</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Experimental Psychology: General</title></host><title>Automatic and effortful processes in memory</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Henley NM. 1977. Body Politics. Power, sex and nonverbal behavior. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C Izard</name></json:item></author><host><volume>58</volume><pages><last>498</last><first>487</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>Facial expressions and the regulation of emotions</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>James W. 1890. Principles of Psychology. Holt: New York (2 vols).</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>PJ Lang</name></json:item><json:item><name>MM Bradley</name></json:item><json:item><name>BN Cuthbert</name></json:item></author><host><volume>97</volume><pages><last>395</last><first>377</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychological Review</title></host><title>Emotion, attention, and the startle reflex</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>PJ Lang</name></json:item></author><host><volume>50</volume><pages><last>385</last><first>372</first></pages><author></author><title>American Psychologist</title></host><title>The emotion probe: studies of motivation and attention</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>RJ Larsen</name></json:item><json:item><name>M Kasimatis</name></json:item><json:item><name>K Frey</name></json:item></author><host><volume>6</volume><pages><last>338</last><first>321</first></pages><author></author><title>Cognition and Emotion</title></host><title>Facilitating the furrowed brow: An unobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis applied to unpleasant affect</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Lewin K. 1935. A Dynamic Theory of Personality. McGraw‐Hill: New York.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Logue AW. 1986. Psychology of Eating and Drinking. Freeman and Company: New York.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D Matsumoto</name></json:item></author><host><volume>14</volume><pages><last>214</last><first>195</first></pages><author></author><title>Motivation and Emotion</title></host><title>Cultural similarities and differences in display rules</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>O'Connor J. 1932. Finger Dexterity Test. Stoelting Company: Chicago, IL.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>RE Petty</name></json:item><json:item><name>GL Wells</name></json:item><json:item><name>M Heesacker</name></json:item><json:item><name>JT Cacioppo</name></json:item></author><host><volume>9</volume><pages><last>222</last><first>209</first></pages><author></author><title>Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin</title></host><title>The effects of recipient posture on persuasion: A cognitive response analysis</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C Pfaffmann</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>108</last><first>71</first></pages><author></author><title>Nebraska Symposium on Motivation</title></host><title>The sensory and motivating properties of the sense of taste</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C Pfaffmann</name></json:item><json:item><name>R Norgren</name></json:item><json:item><name>HJ Grill</name></json:item></author><host><volume>290</volume><pages><last>34</last><first>18</first></pages><author></author><title>Annals of the New York Academy of Science</title></host><title>Sensory affect and motivation</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>JR Priester</name></json:item><json:item><name>JT Cacioppo</name></json:item><json:item><name>RE Petty</name></json:item></author><host><volume>22</volume><pages><last>447</last><first>442</first></pages><author></author><title>Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin</title></host><title>The influence of motor processes on attitudes toward novel stimuli versus familiar semantic stimuli</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>W Prinz</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>201</last><first>167</first></pages><author></author><title>Relationships between Perception and Action: Current approaches</title></host><title>A common coding approach to perception and action</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>JH Riskind</name></json:item></author><host><volume>2</volume><pages><last>86</last><first>62</first></pages><author></author><title>Social Cognition</title></host><title>Nonverbal expressions and the accessibility of life experience memories: A congruence hypothesis</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>N Schwarz</name></json:item><json:item><name>J Clore</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>465</last><first>433</first></pages><author></author><title>Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles</title></host><title>Feelings and phenomenal experiences</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>JE Steiner</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>189</last><first>173</first></pages><author></author><title>Taste and Development</title></host><title>Facial expressions of the neonate infant indicating the hedonics of food‐related chemical stimuli</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>JE Steiner</name></json:item></author><host><volume>13</volume><pages><last>295</last><first>257</first></pages><author></author><title>Advances in Child Development and Behavior</title></host><title>Human facial expressions in response to taste and smell stimulation</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Der Einfluß der Körperhaltung auf die Emotion ‘Stolz’. Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur ‘Körper‐Feedback’‐Hypothese</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>S Stepper</name></json:item><json:item><name>F Strack</name></json:item></author><host><volume>64</volume><pages><last>220</last><first>211</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>Proprioceptive determinants of emotional and nonemotional feelings</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>F Strack</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>275</last><first>245</first></pages><author></author><title>The Construction of Social Judgment</title></host><title>The different routes to social judgments: Experiential vs. Informational strategies</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>F Strack</name></json:item><json:item><name>MH Gonzales</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>315</last><first>291</first></pages><author></author><title>Kognitive Täuschungen</title></host><title>Wissen und Fühlen: noetische und experientielle Grundlagen heuristischer Urteilsblidung</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>F Strack</name></json:item><json:item><name>LL Martin</name></json:item><json:item><name>S Stepper</name></json:item></author><host><volume>54</volume><pages><last>777</last><first>768</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of facial expressions: a non‐obtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>F Strack</name></json:item><json:item><name>R Neumann</name></json:item></author><host><volume>65</volume><pages><last>304</last><first>300</first></pages><author></author><title>Organizational Behavior and Decision Processes</title></host><title>The spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak. Beyond mind‐body interactions in human decision making</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>AK Solarz</name></json:item></author><host><volume>59</volume><pages><last>245</last><first>239</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Experimental Psychology</title></host><title>Latency of instrumental responses as a function of compatibility with the meaning of eliciting verbal signs</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>JG Snodgrass</name></json:item><json:item><name>J Corwin</name></json:item></author><host><volume>117</volume><pages><last>50</last><first>34</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Experimental Psychology: General</title></host><title>Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G Tom</name></json:item><json:item><name>P Patterson</name></json:item><json:item><name>T Lau</name></json:item><json:item><name>T Burton</name></json:item><json:item><name>J Cook</name></json:item></author><host><volume>12</volume><pages><last>289</last><first>281</first></pages><author></author><title>Basic and Applied Psychology</title></host><title>The role of overt head movements in the formation of affect</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>GL Wells</name></json:item><json:item><name>RE Petty</name></json:item></author><host><volume>1</volume><pages><last>230</last><first>219</first></pages><author></author><title>Basic and Applied Social Psychology</title></host><title>The effects of overt head movements on persuasion: Compatibility and incompatibility of responses</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>RB Zajonc</name></json:item></author><host><volume>35</volume><pages><last>175</last><first>151</first></pages><author></author><title>American Psychologist</title></host><title>Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>RB Zajonc</name></json:item><json:item><name>ST Murphy</name></json:item><json:item><name>M Inglehart</name></json:item></author><host><volume>96</volume><pages><last>416</last><first>395</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychological Review</title></host><title>Feeling and facial efference: Implications of the vascular theory of emotion</title></json:item></refBibs><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>30</volume><publisherId><json:string>EJSP</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>19</total><last>871</last><first>853</first></pages><issn><json:string>0046-2772</json:string></issn><issue>6</issue><subject><json:item><value>Research Article</value></json:item></subject><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1099-0992</json:string></eissn><title>European Journal of Social Psychology</title><doi><json:string>10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0992</json:string></doi></host><categories><wos><json:string>social science</json:string><json:string>psychology, social</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>health sciences</json:string><json:string>psychology & cognitive sciences</json:string><json:string>social psychology</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>2000</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2000</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1002/1099-0992(200011/12)30:6>853::AID-EJSP20>3.0.CO;2-1</json:string></doi><id>DD547F24E45C6C29CEC0CF48FB5A97C23429C67B</id><score>0.015791858</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/DD547F24E45C6C29CEC0CF48FB5A97C23429C67B/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/DD547F24E45C6C29CEC0CF48FB5A97C23429C67B/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/DD547F24E45C6C29CEC0CF48FB5A97C23429C67B/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Compatibility between approach/avoidance stimulation and valenced information determines residual attention during the process of encoding</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><pubPlace>Chichester, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p></availability><date>2000</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note>Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft - No. Ste 662/3‐2;</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Compatibility between approach/avoidance stimulation and valenced information determines residual attention during the process of encoding</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Jens</forename><surname>Förster</surname></persName><affiliation>University of Würzburg, Germany</affiliation><affiliation>Jens Förster, Department of Psychology, Lehrstuhl für Psychologie II, Röntgenring 10, D‐9707 Würzburg, Germany</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">Sabine</forename><surname>Stepper</surname></persName><affiliation>University of Würzburg, Germany</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">European Journal of Social Psychology</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Eur. J. Soc. Psychol.</title><idno type="pISSN">0046-2772</idno><idno type="eISSN">1099-0992</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0992</idno><imprint><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><pubPlace>Chichester, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2000-11"></date><biblScope unit="volume">30</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="853">853</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="871">871</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">DD547F24E45C6C29CEC0CF48FB5A97C23429C67B</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/1099-0992(200011/12)30:6<853::AID-EJSP20>3.0.CO;2-1</idno><idno type="ArticleID">EJSP20</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2000</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>We tested the hypothesis that the activation of the motivational systems of approach or avoidance by body postures and taste influences residual attention during the process of encoding differentially valenced words. In Experiment 1, participants were asked to stand upright or kneel while learning either positive or negative adjectives. To measure participants' differential cognitive capacities, a dual task paradigm was used, including a finger‐dexterity test as a secondary task. We were able to show that participants performed worse on the secondary task compared to a baseline assessed before if there was incompatibility between postures and the valence of the information. In Experiment 2, we replicated the results with bitter and sweet taste instead of body positions. It is our contention that the activation of approach or avoidance systems by bodily states prepares the organism for information of differential valence. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="Journal Subject"><list><head>article-category</head><item><term>Research Article</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1999-09-27">Received</change><change when="2000-05-22">Registration</change><change when="2000-11">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/DD547F24E45C6C29CEC0CF48FB5A97C23429C67B/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisherName><publisherLoc>Chichester, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi registered="yes">10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0992</doi><issn type="print">0046-2772</issn><issn type="electronic">1099-0992</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="EJSP"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" xml:lang="en" sort="EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY">European Journal of Social Psychology</title><title type="short">Eur. J. Soc. Psychol.</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="60"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1002/1099-0992(200011/12)30:6<>1.0.CO;2-U</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="30">30</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">6</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2000-11">November/December 2000</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="6" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1002/1099-0992(200011/12)30:6<853::AID-EJSP20>3.0.CO;2-1</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="EJSP20"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="19"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Research Article</title><title type="tocHeading1">Research Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="manuscriptReceived" date="1999-09-27"></event><event type="manuscriptAccepted" date="2000-05-22"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2000-11-16"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2000-11-16"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:JWSART34_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-03-06"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-24"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">853</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">871</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Jens Förster, Department of Psychology, Lehrstuhl für Psychologie II, Röntgenring 10, D‐9707 Würzburg, Germany</correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:EJSP.EJSP20.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="4"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="56"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" xml:lang="en">Compatibility between approach/avoidance stimulation and valenced information determines residual attention during the process of encoding</title><title type="short" xml:lang="en">Approach/avoidance stimulation and residual attention</title></titleGroup><creators><creator xml:id="au1" creatorRole="author" affiliationRef="#af1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Jens</givenNames><familyName>Förster</familyName></personName><contactDetails><email normalForm="foerster@psychologie.uni-wuerzburg.de">foerster@psychologie.uni‐wuerzburg.de</email></contactDetails></creator><creator xml:id="au2" creatorRole="author" affiliationRef="#af1"><personName><givenNames>Sabine</givenNames><familyName>Stepper</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="af1" countryCode="DE" type="organization"><unparsedAffiliation>University of Würzburg, Germany</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><fundingInfo><fundingAgency>Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft</fundingAgency><fundingNumber>Ste 662/3‐2</fundingNumber></fundingInfo><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p>We tested the hypothesis that the activation of the motivational systems of approach or avoidance by body postures and taste influences residual attention during the process of encoding differentially valenced words. In Experiment 1, participants were asked to stand upright or kneel while learning either positive or negative adjectives. To measure participants' differential cognitive capacities, a dual task paradigm was used, including a finger‐dexterity test as a secondary task. We were able to show that participants performed worse on the secondary task compared to a baseline assessed before if there was incompatibility between postures and the valence of the information. In Experiment 2, we replicated the results with bitter and sweet taste instead of body positions. It is our contention that the activation of approach or avoidance systems by bodily states prepares the organism for information of differential valence. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Compatibility between approach/avoidance stimulation and valenced information determines residual attention during the process of encoding</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Approach/avoidance stimulation and residual attention</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Compatibility between approach/avoidance stimulation and valenced information determines residual attention during the process of encoding</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Jens</namePart><namePart type="family">Förster</namePart><affiliation>University of Würzburg, Germany</affiliation><affiliation>Jens Förster, Department of Psychology, Lehrstuhl für Psychologie II, Röntgenring 10, D‐9707 Würzburg, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Sabine</namePart><namePart type="family">Stepper</namePart><affiliation>University of Würzburg, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Chichester, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000-11</dateIssued><dateCaptured encoding="w3cdtf">1999-09-27</dateCaptured><dateValid encoding="w3cdtf">2000-05-22</dateValid><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2000</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="tables">4</extent><extent unit="references">56</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">We tested the hypothesis that the activation of the motivational systems of approach or avoidance by body postures and taste influences residual attention during the process of encoding differentially valenced words. In Experiment 1, participants were asked to stand upright or kneel while learning either positive or negative adjectives. To measure participants' differential cognitive capacities, a dual task paradigm was used, including a finger‐dexterity test as a secondary task. We were able to show that participants performed worse on the secondary task compared to a baseline assessed before if there was incompatibility between postures and the valence of the information. In Experiment 2, we replicated the results with bitter and sweet taste instead of body positions. It is our contention that the activation of approach or avoidance systems by bodily states prepares the organism for information of differential valence. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><note type="funding">Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft - No. Ste 662/3‐2; </note><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>European Journal of Social Psychology</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Eur. J. Soc. Psychol.</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Research Article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0046-2772</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1099-0992</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0992</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">EJSP</identifier><part><date>2000</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>30</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>6</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>853</start><end>871</end><total>19</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">DD547F24E45C6C29CEC0CF48FB5A97C23429C67B</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1002/1099-0992(200011/12)30:6<853::AID-EJSP20>3.0.CO;2-1</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">EJSP20</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Rhénanie/explor/UnivTrevesV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001481 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001481 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Rhénanie
|area= UnivTrevesV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:DD547F24E45C6C29CEC0CF48FB5A97C23429C67B
|texte= Compatibility between approach/avoidance stimulation and valenced information determines residual attention during the process of encoding
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |