A latent state-trait model (not only) for social desirability
Identifieur interne : 001439 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001438; suivant : 001440A latent state-trait model (not only) for social desirability
Auteurs : Manfred J. Schmitt ; Rolf SteyerSource :
- Personality and Individual Differences [ 0191-8869 ] ; 1993.
Abstract
A latent state-trait model for social desirability is proposed, that—aside from the trait to be measured—takes into account method factors as well as systematic effects of the situation of measurement and the person-situation interaction. Parallel test halves of a German version of the Marlowe-Crowne Scale were administered to two independent samples: Sample 1, N1 = 380, measured twice with a 6-month lag; and Sample 2, N2 = 215, measured three times with 9-month lags. The traditional latent trait model and the latent state-trait model with method factors were tested against each other. As expected, the former fit the data poorly, the latter very well. The common trait explained 58% of the variance of the test halves, the test half-specific or method factors 17%, and the occasion-specific situation and interaction effects a small but significant 6%. The latent state-trait model enables a more adequate representation of the social desirability construct, and the model is applicable to a wide array of personality phenomena.
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/0191-8869(93)90144-R
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:D530D49751EA44EBD89C46D3EB3CD43FFA9E71A6Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>A latent state-trait model (not only) for social desirability</title><author><name sortKey="Schmitt, Manfred J" sort="Schmitt, Manfred J" uniqKey="Schmitt M" first="Manfred J." last="Schmitt">Manfred J. Schmitt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Fachbereich I—Psychologie, Universität Trier, Postfach 3825, 5500 Trier, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Steyer, Rolf" sort="Steyer, Rolf" uniqKey="Steyer R" first="Rolf" last="Steyer">Rolf Steyer</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Fachbereich I—Psychologie, Universität Trier, Postfach 3825, 5500 Trier, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:D530D49751EA44EBD89C46D3EB3CD43FFA9E71A6</idno><date when="1993" year="1993">1993</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/0191-8869(93)90144-R</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/D530D49751EA44EBD89C46D3EB3CD43FFA9E71A6/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001439</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001439</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">A latent state-trait model (not only) for social desirability</title><author><name sortKey="Schmitt, Manfred J" sort="Schmitt, Manfred J" uniqKey="Schmitt M" first="Manfred J." last="Schmitt">Manfred J. Schmitt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Fachbereich I—Psychologie, Universität Trier, Postfach 3825, 5500 Trier, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Steyer, Rolf" sort="Steyer, Rolf" uniqKey="Steyer R" first="Rolf" last="Steyer">Rolf Steyer</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Fachbereich I—Psychologie, Universität Trier, Postfach 3825, 5500 Trier, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Personality and Individual Differences</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">PAID</title><idno type="ISSN">0191-8869</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1993">1993</date><biblScope unit="volume">14</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="519">519</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="529">529</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0191-8869</idno></series><idno type="istex">D530D49751EA44EBD89C46D3EB3CD43FFA9E71A6</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/0191-8869(93)90144-R</idno><idno type="PII">0191-8869(93)90144-R</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0191-8869</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">A latent state-trait model for social desirability is proposed, that—aside from the trait to be measured—takes into account method factors as well as systematic effects of the situation of measurement and the person-situation interaction. Parallel test halves of a German version of the Marlowe-Crowne Scale were administered to two independent samples: Sample 1, N1 = 380, measured twice with a 6-month lag; and Sample 2, N2 = 215, measured three times with 9-month lags. The traditional latent trait model and the latent state-trait model with method factors were tested against each other. As expected, the former fit the data poorly, the latter very well. The common trait explained 58% of the variance of the test halves, the test half-specific or method factors 17%, and the occasion-specific situation and interaction effects a small but significant 6%. The latent state-trait model enables a more adequate representation of the social desirability construct, and the model is applicable to a wide array of personality phenomena.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>elsevier</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Manfred J. Schmitt</name><affiliations><json:string>Fachbereich I—Psychologie, Universität Trier, Postfach 3825, 5500 Trier, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Rolf Steyer</name><affiliations><json:string>Fachbereich I—Psychologie, Universität Trier, Postfach 3825, 5500 Trier, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>Full-length article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>A latent state-trait model for social desirability is proposed, that—aside from the trait to be measured—takes into account method factors as well as systematic effects of the situation of measurement and the person-situation interaction. Parallel test halves of a German version of the Marlowe-Crowne Scale were administered to two independent samples: Sample 1, N1 = 380, measured twice with a 6-month lag; and Sample 2, N2 = 215, measured three times with 9-month lags. The traditional latent trait model and the latent state-trait model with method factors were tested against each other. As expected, the former fit the data poorly, the latter very well. The common trait explained 58% of the variance of the test halves, the test half-specific or method factors 17%, and the occasion-specific situation and interaction effects a small but significant 6%. The latent state-trait model enables a more adequate representation of the social desirability construct, and the model is applicable to a wide array of personality phenomena.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.673</score><pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>540 x 792 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><keywordCount>0</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>1036</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>4741</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>33138</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>11</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>161</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>A latent state-trait model (not only) for social desirability</title><pii><json:string>0191-8869(93)90144-R</json:string></pii><refBibs><json:item><author><json:item><name>S. Ahadi</name></json:item><json:item><name>E. Diener</name></json:item></author><host><volume>56</volume><pages><last>406</last><first>398</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>Multiple determinants and effect size</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>N.H. Anderson</name></json:item></author><host><volume>9</volume><pages><last>279</last><first>272</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>Likeableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>EQS. Structural equations program manual</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>P. Borkenau</name></json:item></author><host><volume>51</volume><pages><last>381</last><first>371</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>Toward an understanding of trait interrelations: Acts as instances for several traits</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>P. Borkenau</name></json:item></author><host><volume>22</volume><pages><last>352</last><first>337</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Research in Personality</title></host><title>The multiple classification of acts and the big five factors of personality</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D.P. Crowne</name></json:item><json:item><name>D. Marlowe</name></json:item></author><host><volume>24</volume><pages><last>354</last><first>349</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Consulting Psychology</title></host><title>A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>The approval motive</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>W.M. Hartmann</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>SoftStat '89. Fortschritte der Statistik—Software</title></host><serie><author></author><title>SoftStat '89. Fortschritte der Statistik—Software</title></serie><title>ProcCALIS: Analysis of covariance structures</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C. Hertzog</name></json:item><json:item><name>J.R. Nesselroade</name></json:item></author><host><volume>58</volume><pages><last>109</last><first>93</first></pages><author></author><title>Child Development</title></host><title>Beyond autoregressive models: Some implications of the trait-state distinction for the structural modeling of developmental change</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C. Kirschbaum</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. Steyer</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Eid</name></json:item><json:item><name>U. Patalla</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. Schwenkmezger</name></json:item><json:item><name>D.H. Hellhammer</name></json:item></author><host><volume>15</volume><pages><last>307</last><first>297</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychoneuroendocrinology</title></host><title>Cortisol and behavior: 2. Application of a latent state-trait model to salivary cortisol</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Statistical theories of mental test scores</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>H.E. Lück</name></json:item></author><host><volume>19</volume><pages><last>266</last><first>258</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychologische Rundschau</title></host><title>Zur sozialen Erwünschtheit von Eigenschaftsbezeichnungen</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>H.E. Lück</name></json:item><json:item><name>E. Timaeus</name></json:item></author><host><volume>15</volume><pages><last>141</last><first>134</first></pages><author></author><title>Diagnostica</title></host><title>Skalen zur Messung Manifester Angst (MAS) und sozialer Wünschbarkeit (SDS-E und SDS-CM)</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R.P. McDonald</name></json:item></author><host><volume>31</volume><pages><last>72</last><first>59</first></pages><author></author><title>British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology</title></host><title>A simple comprehensive model for the analysis of covariance structures</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R.P. McDonald</name></json:item></author><host><volume>33</volume><pages><last>183</last><first>161</first></pages><author></author><title>British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology</title></host><title>A simple comprehensive model for the analysis of covariance structures: Some remarks on applications</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. Millham</name></json:item><json:item><name>L.I. Jacobson</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>390</last><first>365</first></pages><author></author><title>Dimensions of personality</title></host><title>The need for approval</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L. Montada</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. Schneider</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>81</last><first>58</first></pages><author></author><title>Altruism in social systems</title></host><title>Justice and prosocial commitments</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L. Montada</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Schmitt</name></json:item><json:item><name>C. Dalbert</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>203</last><first>177</first></pages><author></author><title>Altruism in social systems</title></host><title>Prosocial commitments in the family: Situational, personality, and systematic factors</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>H.D. Mummendey</name></json:item></author><host><volume>2</volume><pages><last>218</last><first>199</first></pages><author></author><title>Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie</title></host><title>Methoden und Probleme der Kontrolle sozialer Erwünschthit</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>LISCOMP. Analysis of linear structural equations with comprehensive measurement model</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J.R. Nesselroade</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. Pruchno</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. Jacobs</name></json:item></author><host><volume>28</volume><pages><last>264</last><first>255</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychologische Beiträge</title></host><title>Reliability vs stability in the measurement of psychological states: An illustration with anxiety measures</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>K.E. O'Grady</name></json:item></author><host><volume>23</volume><pages><last>101</last><first>87</first></pages><author></author><title>Multivariate Behavioral Research</title></host><title>The Marlowe-Crowne and Edwards social desirability scales: A psychometric perspective</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D.L. Paulhus</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>165</last><first>143</first></pages><author></author><title>Personality assessment via questionnaires: Current issues in theory and measurement</title></host><title>Self-description and impression management in test responses</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M.J. Schmitt</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. Steyer</name></json:item></author><host><volume>4</volume><pages><last>107</last><first>101</first></pages><author></author><title>Methodika</title></host><title>Beyond intuition and classical test theory: A reply to Epstein</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C.D. Spielberger</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>Anxiety: Current trend in theory and research</title></host><serie><author></author><title>Anxiety: Current trend in theory and research</title></serie><title>Anxiety as an emotional state</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. Steyer</name></json:item></author><host><volume>8</volume><pages><last>258</last><first>245</first></pages><author></author><title>Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie</title></host><title>Konsistenz und Spezifität: Definition zweier zentraler Begriffe der Differentiellen Psychologie und ein einfaches Modell zu ihrer Identifikation</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. Steyer</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Schmitt</name></json:item></author><host><volume>24</volume><pages><last>445</last><first>427</first></pages><author></author><title>Quality & Quantity</title></host><title>Latent state-trait models in attitude research</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. Steyer</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Schmitt</name></json:item></author><host><volume>4</volume><pages><last>94</last><first>58</first></pages><author></author><title>Methodika</title></host><title>The effects of aggregation across and within occasions on consistency, specificity, and reliability</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. Steyer</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. Schwenkmezger</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. Auer</name></json:item></author><host><volume>11</volume><pages><last>134</last><first>125</first></pages><author></author><title>Personality and Individual Differences</title></host><title>The emotional and cognitive components of trait anxiety: A latent state-trait anxiety model</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. Steyer</name></json:item><json:item><name>A.-M. Majcen</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. Schwenkmezger</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. Buchner</name></json:item></author><host><volume>1</volume><pages><last>299</last><first>281</first></pages><author></author><title>Anxiety Research</title></host><title>A latent state-trait anxiety model and its application to determine consistency and specificity coefficients</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>B.R. Strickland</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>356</last><first>315</first></pages><author></author><title>Personality variables in social behavior</title></host><title>Approval motivation</title></json:item></refBibs><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><serie><volume>2</volume><editor><json:item><name>F. Faulbaum</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. Haux</name></json:item><json:item><name>K.-M. Jöckel</name></json:item></editor><pages><last>81</last><first>74</first></pages><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><title>SoftStat '89. Fortschritte der Statistik—Software</title></serie><host><volume>14</volume><pii><json:string>S0191-8869(00)X0158-4</json:string></pii><pages><last>529</last><first>519</first></pages><issn><json:string>0191-8869</json:string></issn><issue>4</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><title>Personality and Individual Differences</title><publicationDate>1993</publicationDate></host><categories><wos><json:string>social science</json:string><json:string>psychology, social</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>health sciences</json:string><json:string>psychology & cognitive sciences</json:string><json:string>social psychology</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>1993</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1993</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1016/0191-8869(93)90144-R</json:string></doi><id>D530D49751EA44EBD89C46D3EB3CD43FFA9E71A6</id><score>0.98270744</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D530D49751EA44EBD89C46D3EB3CD43FFA9E71A6/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D530D49751EA44EBD89C46D3EB3CD43FFA9E71A6/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/D530D49751EA44EBD89C46D3EB3CD43FFA9E71A6/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a">A latent state-trait model (not only) for social desirability</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><availability><p>ELSEVIER</p></availability><date>1993</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a">A latent state-trait model (not only) for social desirability</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Manfred J.</forename><surname>Schmitt</surname></persName><affiliation>Fachbereich I—Psychologie, Universität Trier, Postfach 3825, 5500 Trier, Germany</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">Rolf</forename><surname>Steyer</surname></persName><affiliation>Fachbereich I—Psychologie, Universität Trier, Postfach 3825, 5500 Trier, Germany</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Personality and Individual Differences</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">PAID</title><idno type="pISSN">0191-8869</idno><idno type="PII">S0191-8869(00)X0158-4</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1993"></date><biblScope unit="volume">14</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="519">519</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="529">529</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">D530D49751EA44EBD89C46D3EB3CD43FFA9E71A6</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/0191-8869(93)90144-R</idno><idno type="PII">0191-8869(93)90144-R</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1993</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>A latent state-trait model for social desirability is proposed, that—aside from the trait to be measured—takes into account method factors as well as systematic effects of the situation of measurement and the person-situation interaction. Parallel test halves of a German version of the Marlowe-Crowne Scale were administered to two independent samples: Sample 1, N1 = 380, measured twice with a 6-month lag; and Sample 2, N2 = 215, measured three times with 9-month lags. The traditional latent trait model and the latent state-trait model with method factors were tested against each other. As expected, the former fit the data poorly, the latter very well. The common trait explained 58% of the variance of the test halves, the test half-specific or method factors 17%, and the occasion-specific situation and interaction effects a small but significant 6%. The latent state-trait model enables a more adequate representation of the social desirability construct, and the model is applicable to a wide array of personality phenomena.</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1993">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D530D49751EA44EBD89C46D3EB3CD43FFA9E71A6/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Elsevier, elements deleted: tail"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//ES//DTD journal article DTD version 4.5.2//EN//XML" URI="art452.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><converted-article version="4.5.2" docsubtype="fla"><item-info><jid>PAID</jid><aid>9390144R</aid><ce:pii>0191-8869(93)90144-R</ce:pii><ce:doi>10.1016/0191-8869(93)90144-R</ce:doi><ce:copyright type="unknown" year="1993"></ce:copyright></item-info><head><ce:title>A latent state-trait model (not only) for social desirability</ce:title><ce:author-group><ce:author><ce:given-name>Manfred J.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Schmitt</ce:surname></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>Rolf</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Steyer</ce:surname></ce:author><ce:affiliation><ce:textfn>Fachbereich I—Psychologie, Universität Trier, Postfach 3825, 5500 Trier, Germany</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation></ce:author-group><ce:date-received day="29" month="5" year="1992"></ce:date-received><ce:abstract><ce:section-title>Abstract</ce:section-title><ce:abstract-sec><ce:simple-para>A latent state-trait model for social desirability is proposed, that—aside from the trait to be measured—takes into account method factors as well as systematic effects of the situation of measurement and the person-situation interaction. Parallel test halves of a German version of the Marlowe-Crowne Scale were administered to two independent samples: Sample 1, <ce:italic>N</ce:italic><ce:inf>1</ce:inf> = 380, measured twice with a 6-month lag; and Sample 2, <ce:italic>N</ce:italic><ce:inf>2</ce:inf> = 215, measured three times with 9-month lags. The traditional latent trait model and the latent state-trait model with method factors were tested against each other. As expected, the former fit the data poorly, the latter very well. The common trait explained 58% of the variance of the test halves, the test half-specific or method factors 17%, and the occasion-specific situation and interaction effects a small but significant 6%. The latent state-trait model enables a more adequate representation of the social desirability construct, and the model is applicable to a wide array of personality phenomena.</ce:simple-para></ce:abstract-sec></ce:abstract></head></converted-article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo><title>A latent state-trait model (not only) for social desirability</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA"><title>A latent state-trait model (not only) for social desirability</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Manfred J.</namePart><namePart type="family">Schmitt</namePart><affiliation>Fachbereich I—Psychologie, Universität Trier, Postfach 3825, 5500 Trier, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Rolf</namePart><namePart type="family">Steyer</namePart><affiliation>Fachbereich I—Psychologie, Universität Trier, Postfach 3825, 5500 Trier, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="Full-length article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1993</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1993</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">A latent state-trait model for social desirability is proposed, that—aside from the trait to be measured—takes into account method factors as well as systematic effects of the situation of measurement and the person-situation interaction. Parallel test halves of a German version of the Marlowe-Crowne Scale were administered to two independent samples: Sample 1, N1 = 380, measured twice with a 6-month lag; and Sample 2, N2 = 215, measured three times with 9-month lags. The traditional latent trait model and the latent state-trait model with method factors were tested against each other. As expected, the former fit the data poorly, the latter very well. The common trait explained 58% of the variance of the test halves, the test half-specific or method factors 17%, and the occasion-specific situation and interaction effects a small but significant 6%. The latent state-trait model enables a more adequate representation of the social desirability construct, and the model is applicable to a wide array of personality phenomena.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Personality and Individual Differences</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>PAID</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><originInfo><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">199304</dateIssued></originInfo><identifier type="ISSN">0191-8869</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0191-8869(00)X0158-4</identifier><part><date>199304</date><detail type="volume"><number>14</number><caption>vol.</caption></detail><detail type="issue"><number>4</number><caption>no.</caption></detail><extent unit="issue pages"><start>507</start><end>628</end></extent><extent unit="pages"><start>519</start><end>529</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">D530D49751EA44EBD89C46D3EB3CD43FFA9E71A6</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1016/0191-8869(93)90144-R</identifier><identifier type="PII">0191-8869(93)90144-R</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource>ELSEVIER</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods></metadata></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Rhénanie/explor/UnivTrevesV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001439 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001439 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Rhénanie
|area= UnivTrevesV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:D530D49751EA44EBD89C46D3EB3CD43FFA9E71A6
|texte= A latent state-trait model (not only) for social desirability
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |