Introversion-extraversion and Event-Related Potential (ERP): A test of J.A. Gray's theory
Identifieur interne : 001396 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001395; suivant : 001397Introversion-extraversion and Event-Related Potential (ERP): A test of J.A. Gray's theory
Auteurs : Dieter Bartussek ; Oliver Diedrich ; Ewald Naumann ; Wilfried ColletSource :
- Personality and Individual Differences [ 0191-8869 ] ; 1993.
Abstract
Following Gray's theory of introversion-extroversion, extraverts should demonstrate stronger reactions to stimuli of reward than to stimuli of punishment, while introverts should be more susceptible to stimuli of punishment than to stimuli of reward. In the present study reward and punishment were operationalized by winning and losing different amounts of money in a gambling situation while measuring Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) to the stimuli signalling winnings and losses and to the presentation of the amount to win or lose. The components P2, N2, and P3e of the ERPs to the feedback of winning and losing which are known to be influenced by stimulus meaning demonstrated the predicted interaction between extraversion and winning/losing. This interaction was found also for the late time region of the ERPs to the display of the amounts, according to winning or losing in the preceding trial. The results suggest that—on the background of an explicit theory—the ERP is a sensitive index for interindividual differences.
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/0191-8869(93)90149-W
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:A63D9285EB4DE4AD88BF693B3B2B22D30AD5351BLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>Introversion-extraversion and Event-Related Potential (ERP): A test of J.A. Gray's theory</title><author><name sortKey="Bartussek, Dieter" sort="Bartussek, Dieter" uniqKey="Bartussek D" first="Dieter" last="Bartussek">Dieter Bartussek</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Trier, 5500 Trier, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Diedrich, Oliver" sort="Diedrich, Oliver" uniqKey="Diedrich O" first="Oliver" last="Diedrich">Oliver Diedrich</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Trier, 5500 Trier, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Naumann, Ewald" sort="Naumann, Ewald" uniqKey="Naumann E" first="Ewald" last="Naumann">Ewald Naumann</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Trier, 5500 Trier, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Collet, Wilfried" sort="Collet, Wilfried" uniqKey="Collet W" first="Wilfried" last="Collet">Wilfried Collet</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Trier, 5500 Trier, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:A63D9285EB4DE4AD88BF693B3B2B22D30AD5351B</idno><date when="1993" year="1993">1993</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/0191-8869(93)90149-W</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/A63D9285EB4DE4AD88BF693B3B2B22D30AD5351B/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001396</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001396</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">Introversion-extraversion and Event-Related Potential (ERP): A test of J.A. Gray's theory</title><author><name sortKey="Bartussek, Dieter" sort="Bartussek, Dieter" uniqKey="Bartussek D" first="Dieter" last="Bartussek">Dieter Bartussek</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Trier, 5500 Trier, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Diedrich, Oliver" sort="Diedrich, Oliver" uniqKey="Diedrich O" first="Oliver" last="Diedrich">Oliver Diedrich</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Trier, 5500 Trier, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Naumann, Ewald" sort="Naumann, Ewald" uniqKey="Naumann E" first="Ewald" last="Naumann">Ewald Naumann</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Trier, 5500 Trier, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Collet, Wilfried" sort="Collet, Wilfried" uniqKey="Collet W" first="Wilfried" last="Collet">Wilfried Collet</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Trier, 5500 Trier, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Personality and Individual Differences</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">PAID</title><idno type="ISSN">0191-8869</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1993">1993</date><biblScope unit="volume">14</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="565">565</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="574">574</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0191-8869</idno></series><idno type="istex">A63D9285EB4DE4AD88BF693B3B2B22D30AD5351B</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/0191-8869(93)90149-W</idno><idno type="PII">0191-8869(93)90149-W</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0191-8869</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Following Gray's theory of introversion-extroversion, extraverts should demonstrate stronger reactions to stimuli of reward than to stimuli of punishment, while introverts should be more susceptible to stimuli of punishment than to stimuli of reward. In the present study reward and punishment were operationalized by winning and losing different amounts of money in a gambling situation while measuring Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) to the stimuli signalling winnings and losses and to the presentation of the amount to win or lose. The components P2, N2, and P3e of the ERPs to the feedback of winning and losing which are known to be influenced by stimulus meaning demonstrated the predicted interaction between extraversion and winning/losing. This interaction was found also for the late time region of the ERPs to the display of the amounts, according to winning or losing in the preceding trial. The results suggest that—on the background of an explicit theory—the ERP is a sensitive index for interindividual differences.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>elsevier</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Dieter Bartussek</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Psychology, University of Trier, 5500 Trier, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Oliver Diedrich</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Psychology, University of Trier, 5500 Trier, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Ewald Naumann</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Psychology, University of Trier, 5500 Trier, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Wilfried Collet</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Psychology, University of Trier, 5500 Trier, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>Full-length article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Following Gray's theory of introversion-extroversion, extraverts should demonstrate stronger reactions to stimuli of reward than to stimuli of punishment, while introverts should be more susceptible to stimuli of punishment than to stimuli of reward. In the present study reward and punishment were operationalized by winning and losing different amounts of money in a gambling situation while measuring Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) to the stimuli signalling winnings and losses and to the presentation of the amount to win or lose. The components P2, N2, and P3e of the ERPs to the feedback of winning and losing which are known to be influenced by stimulus meaning demonstrated the predicted interaction between extraversion and winning/losing. This interaction was found also for the late time region of the ERPs to the display of the amounts, according to winning or losing in the preceding trial. The results suggest that—on the background of an explicit theory—the ERP is a sensitive index for interindividual differences.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.585</score><pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>540 x 792 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><keywordCount>0</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>1031</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>4701</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>30048</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>10</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>157</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Introversion-extraversion and Event-Related Potential (ERP): A test of J.A. Gray's theory</title><pii><json:string>0191-8869(93)90149-W</json:string></pii><refBibs><json:item><author><json:item><name>H. Begleiter</name></json:item><json:item><name>M.M. Gross</name></json:item><json:item><name>B. Kissin</name></json:item></author><host><volume>3</volume><pages><last>344</last><first>336</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychophysiology</title></host><title>Evoked cortical responses to affective visual stimuli</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>H. Begleiter</name></json:item><json:item><name>B. Porjesz</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. Garozzo</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>Evoked brain potentials and behavior</title></host><title>Visual evoked potentials and affective rating of semantic stimuli</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>N. Birbaumer</name></json:item><json:item><name>T. Elbert</name></json:item></author><host><volume>11</volume><pages><last>377</last><first>375</first></pages><author></author><title>Behavioral and Brain Sciences</title></host><title>P3: Byproduct of a byproduct</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J.H. Daruna</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. Karrer</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>Sixth International Conference on Event Related Slow Potentials of the Brain</title></host><title>Event-related-potential correlates of intelligence and personality</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J.H. Daruna</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. Karrer</name></json:item><json:item><name>A.J. Rosen</name></json:item></author><host><volume>20</volume><pages><last>259</last><first>249</first></pages><author></author><title>Biological Psychology</title></host><title>Introversion, attention, and the late positive component of event-related potentials</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>V. DePascalis</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. Montirosso</name></json:item></author><host><volume>9</volume><pages><last>360</last><first>353</first></pages><author></author><title>Personality and Individual Differences</title></host><title>Extraversion, neuroticism and individual differences in event-related potentials</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G.M. Ditraglia</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Polich</name></json:item></author><host><volume>28</volume><pages><last>184</last><first>177</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychophysiology</title></host><title>P300 and introverted/extraverted personality types</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>E. Donchin</name></json:item><json:item><name>M.G.H. Coles</name></json:item></author><host><volume>11</volume><pages><last>374</last><first>357</first></pages><author></author><title>Behavioral and Brain Sciences</title></host><title>Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>E. Donchin</name></json:item><json:item><name>W. Ritter</name></json:item><json:item><name>W.C. McCallum</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>Event-related brain potentials in man</title></host><title>Cognitive psychophysiology: The endogenous components of the ERP</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Eysenck-Persönlichkeits-Inventar</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>The biological basis of personality</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>A model for personality</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>H.J. Eysenck</name></json:item></author><host><volume>17</volume><pages><last>397</last><first>369</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Research in Personality</title></host><title>Is there a paradigm in personality research?</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>H.J. Eysenck</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>Handbook of personality. Theory and Research</title></host><title>Biological dimensions of personality</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Personality and individual differences. A natural science approach</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J.F. Golding</name></json:item><json:item><name>C.H. Ashton</name></json:item><json:item><name>V.R. Marsh</name></json:item><json:item><name>J.W. Thompson</name></json:item></author><host><volume>7</volume><pages><last>794</last><first>787</first></pages><author></author><title>Personality and Individual Differences</title></host><title>Early and late SEPs- the later the potential the greater the relevance to personality</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J.A. Gray</name></json:item></author><host><volume>8</volume><pages><last>266</last><first>249</first></pages><author></author><title>Behavior Research and Therapy</title></host><title>The psychophysiological basis of introversion-extraversion</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J.A. Gray</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>276</last><first>246</first></pages><author></author><title>A model for personality</title></host><title>A critique of Eysenck's theory of personality</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J.A. Gray</name></json:item><json:item><name>J.N. Nicholson</name></json:item></author><host><volume>16</volume><pages><last>39</last><first>21</first></pages><author></author><title>Studia Psychologica</title></host><title>Behavioral measures of the susceptibility to frustration in children: relation to neuroticism and introversion</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>W. Hagar</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>264</last><first>43</first></pages><author></author><title>Allgemeine Experimentelle Psychologie</title></host><title>Grundlagen einer Versuchsplanung zur Prüfung empischer Hypothesen in der Psychologie</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. Johnson, Jr</name></json:item></author><host><volume>23</volume><pages><last>383</last><first>367</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychophysiology</title></host><title>A triarchic model of the P300 amplitude</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D.A. Kantorowitz</name></json:item></author><host><volume>16</volume><pages><last>123</last><first>117</first></pages><author></author><title>Behavior Research and Therapy</title></host><title>Personality and conditioning of tumescence and detumescence</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. Näätänen</name></json:item></author><host><volume>26</volume><pages><last>163</last><first>117</first></pages><author></author><title>Biological Psychology</title></host><title>Implications of ERP data for psychological theories of attention</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Nagpal</name></json:item><json:item><name>B.S. Gupta</name></json:item></author><host><volume>70</volume><pages><last>476</last><first>471</first></pages><author></author><title>British Journal of Psychology</title></host><title>Personality, reinforcement, and verbal operant conditioning</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Ereigniskorrelierte Potentiale und Gedächtnis</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>W.S. Pritchard</name></json:item></author><host><volume>10</volume><pages><last>24</last><first>15</first></pages><author></author><title>Personality and Individual Differences</title></host><title>P300 and EPQ/STPI personality traits</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Slow brain potentials and behavior</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>F. Rösler</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Heil</name></json:item></author><host><volume>28</volume><pages><last>358</last><first>344</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychophysiology</title></host><title>Toward a functional categorization of slow waves: taking into account past and future events</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D.S. Ruchkin</name></json:item><json:item><name>S. Sutton</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>Tutorials in event-related potential research: Endogenous components</title></host><title>Positive slow wave and P300: Association and dissociation</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D.S. Ruchkin</name></json:item><json:item><name>S. Sutton</name></json:item><json:item><name>D. Mahaffey</name></json:item></author><host><volume>24</volume><pages><last>102</last><first>87</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychophysiology</title></host><title>Functional differences between members of the P300 complex: P3e and P3b</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>P. Sedlmeier</name></json:item><json:item><name>G. Gigerenzer</name></json:item></author><host><volume>105</volume><pages><last>316</last><first>309</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychological Bulletin</title></host><title>Do studies of statistical power have an effect on the power of studies?</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>O.M. Seunath</name></json:item></author><host><volume>41</volume><pages><last>463</last><first>459</first></pages><author></author><title>Perceptual and Motor Skills</title></host><title>Personality, reinforcement, and learning</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R.M. Stelmack</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. Michaud-Achorn</name></json:item></author><host><volume>19</volume><pages><last>428</last><first>416</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Research in Personality</title></host><title>Extraversion, attention, and the habituation of the auditory evoked response</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G. Stenberg</name></json:item><json:item><name>I. Rosen</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Risberg</name></json:item></author><host><volume>11</volume><pages><last>1254</last><first>1243</first></pages><author></author><title>Personality and Individual Difference</title></host><title>Attention and personality in augmenting/reducing of visual evoked potentials</title></json:item></refBibs><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><host><volume>14</volume><pii><json:string>S0191-8869(00)X0158-4</json:string></pii><pages><last>574</last><first>565</first></pages><issn><json:string>0191-8869</json:string></issn><issue>4</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><title>Personality and Individual Differences</title><publicationDate>1993</publicationDate></host><categories><wos><json:string>social science</json:string><json:string>psychology, social</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>health sciences</json:string><json:string>psychology & cognitive sciences</json:string><json:string>social psychology</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>1993</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1993</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1016/0191-8869(93)90149-W</json:string></doi><id>A63D9285EB4DE4AD88BF693B3B2B22D30AD5351B</id><score>2.1054106</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A63D9285EB4DE4AD88BF693B3B2B22D30AD5351B/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A63D9285EB4DE4AD88BF693B3B2B22D30AD5351B/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/A63D9285EB4DE4AD88BF693B3B2B22D30AD5351B/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a">Introversion-extraversion and Event-Related Potential (ERP): A test of J.A. Gray's theory</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><availability><p>ELSEVIER</p></availability><date>1993</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a">Introversion-extraversion and Event-Related Potential (ERP): A test of J.A. Gray's theory</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Dieter</forename><surname>Bartussek</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Trier, 5500 Trier, Germany</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">Oliver</forename><surname>Diedrich</surname></persName><affiliation>To whom correspondence should be addressed</affiliation><affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Trier, 5500 Trier, Germany</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-3"><persName><forename type="first">Ewald</forename><surname>Naumann</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Trier, 5500 Trier, Germany</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-4"><persName><forename type="first">Wilfried</forename><surname>Collet</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Trier, 5500 Trier, Germany</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Personality and Individual Differences</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">PAID</title><idno type="pISSN">0191-8869</idno><idno type="PII">S0191-8869(00)X0158-4</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1993"></date><biblScope unit="volume">14</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="565">565</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="574">574</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">A63D9285EB4DE4AD88BF693B3B2B22D30AD5351B</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/0191-8869(93)90149-W</idno><idno type="PII">0191-8869(93)90149-W</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1993</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Following Gray's theory of introversion-extroversion, extraverts should demonstrate stronger reactions to stimuli of reward than to stimuli of punishment, while introverts should be more susceptible to stimuli of punishment than to stimuli of reward. In the present study reward and punishment were operationalized by winning and losing different amounts of money in a gambling situation while measuring Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) to the stimuli signalling winnings and losses and to the presentation of the amount to win or lose. The components P2, N2, and P3e of the ERPs to the feedback of winning and losing which are known to be influenced by stimulus meaning demonstrated the predicted interaction between extraversion and winning/losing. This interaction was found also for the late time region of the ERPs to the display of the amounts, according to winning or losing in the preceding trial. The results suggest that—on the background of an explicit theory—the ERP is a sensitive index for interindividual differences.</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1993">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A63D9285EB4DE4AD88BF693B3B2B22D30AD5351B/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Elsevier, elements deleted: tail"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//ES//DTD journal article DTD version 4.5.2//EN//XML" URI="art452.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><converted-article version="4.5.2" docsubtype="fla"><item-info><jid>PAID</jid><aid>9390149W</aid><ce:pii>0191-8869(93)90149-W</ce:pii><ce:doi>10.1016/0191-8869(93)90149-W</ce:doi><ce:copyright type="unknown" year="1993"></ce:copyright></item-info><head><ce:title>Introversion-extraversion and Event-Related Potential (ERP): A test of J.A. Gray's theory</ce:title><ce:author-group><ce:author><ce:given-name>Dieter</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Bartussek</ce:surname></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>Oliver</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Diedrich</ce:surname><ce:cross-ref refid="COR1"><ce:sup>∗</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>Ewald</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Naumann</ce:surname></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>Wilfried</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Collet</ce:surname></ce:author><ce:affiliation><ce:textfn>Department of Psychology, University of Trier, 5500 Trier, Germany</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation><ce:correspondence id="COR1"><ce:label>∗</ce:label><ce:text>To whom correspondence should be addressed</ce:text></ce:correspondence></ce:author-group><ce:date-received day="17" month="4" year="1992"></ce:date-received><ce:abstract><ce:section-title>Abstract</ce:section-title><ce:abstract-sec><ce:simple-para>Following Gray's theory of introversion-extroversion, extraverts should demonstrate stronger reactions to stimuli of reward than to stimuli of punishment, while introverts should be more susceptible to stimuli of punishment than to stimuli of reward. In the present study reward and punishment were operationalized by winning and losing different amounts of money in a gambling situation while measuring Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) to the stimuli signalling winnings and losses and to the presentation of the amount to win or lose. The components P2, N2, and P3e of the ERPs to the feedback of winning and losing which are known to be influenced by stimulus meaning demonstrated the predicted interaction between extraversion and winning/losing. This interaction was found also for the late time region of the ERPs to the display of the amounts, according to winning or losing in the preceding trial. The results suggest that—on the background of an explicit theory—the ERP is a sensitive index for interindividual differences.</ce:simple-para></ce:abstract-sec></ce:abstract></head></converted-article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo><title>Introversion-extraversion and Event-Related Potential (ERP): A test of J.A. Gray's theory</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA"><title>Introversion-extraversion and Event-Related Potential (ERP): A test of J.A. Gray's theory</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Dieter</namePart><namePart type="family">Bartussek</namePart><affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Trier, 5500 Trier, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Oliver</namePart><namePart type="family">Diedrich</namePart><affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Trier, 5500 Trier, Germany</affiliation><description>To whom correspondence should be addressed</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Ewald</namePart><namePart type="family">Naumann</namePart><affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Trier, 5500 Trier, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Wilfried</namePart><namePart type="family">Collet</namePart><affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Trier, 5500 Trier, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="Full-length article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1993</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1993</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Following Gray's theory of introversion-extroversion, extraverts should demonstrate stronger reactions to stimuli of reward than to stimuli of punishment, while introverts should be more susceptible to stimuli of punishment than to stimuli of reward. In the present study reward and punishment were operationalized by winning and losing different amounts of money in a gambling situation while measuring Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) to the stimuli signalling winnings and losses and to the presentation of the amount to win or lose. The components P2, N2, and P3e of the ERPs to the feedback of winning and losing which are known to be influenced by stimulus meaning demonstrated the predicted interaction between extraversion and winning/losing. This interaction was found also for the late time region of the ERPs to the display of the amounts, according to winning or losing in the preceding trial. The results suggest that—on the background of an explicit theory—the ERP is a sensitive index for interindividual differences.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Personality and Individual Differences</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>PAID</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><originInfo><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">199304</dateIssued></originInfo><identifier type="ISSN">0191-8869</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0191-8869(00)X0158-4</identifier><part><date>199304</date><detail type="volume"><number>14</number><caption>vol.</caption></detail><detail type="issue"><number>4</number><caption>no.</caption></detail><extent unit="issue pages"><start>507</start><end>628</end></extent><extent unit="pages"><start>565</start><end>574</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">A63D9285EB4DE4AD88BF693B3B2B22D30AD5351B</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1016/0191-8869(93)90149-W</identifier><identifier type="PII">0191-8869(93)90149-W</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource>ELSEVIER</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Rhénanie/explor/UnivTrevesV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001396 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001396 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Rhénanie
|area= UnivTrevesV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:A63D9285EB4DE4AD88BF693B3B2B22D30AD5351B
|texte= Introversion-extraversion and Event-Related Potential (ERP): A test of J.A. Gray's theory
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |