Justice sensitivity and the processing of justice‐related information
Identifieur interne : 001374 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001373; suivant : 001375Justice sensitivity and the processing of justice‐related information
Auteurs : Anna Baumert ; Mario Gollwitzer ; Miriam Staubach ; Manfred SchmittSource :
- European Journal of Personality [ 0890-2070 ] ; 2011-09.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
We investigated how Justice Sensitivity (JS) shapes the processing of justice‐related information. We proposed that due to frequently perceiving and ruminating about injustices, persons high in JS develop highly accessible and differentiated injustice concepts that shape attention, interpretation and memory for justice‐related information. Three studies provided evidence for these assumptions. After witnessing injustice, persons high in JS attended more strongly to unjust stimuli than to negative control stimuli (Study1) and interpreted an ambiguous situation as less just than persons low in JS (Study2). Finally, they displayed a memory advantage for unjust information (Study3). Results suggest that JS involves the availability and accessibility of injustice concepts as parameters of cognitive functioning and offer explanations for effects of JS on justice‐related behaviour. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Url:
DOI: 10.1002/per.800
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:42EC6A395F2F45EF190E3215F54DFDA69CE76752Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Justice sensitivity and the processing of justice‐related information</title><author><name sortKey="Baumert, Anna" sort="Baumert, Anna" uniqKey="Baumert A" first="Anna" last="Baumert">Anna Baumert</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Koblenz‐Landau, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Koblenz‐Landau, Fortstrasse 7, Landau 76829, Germany.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gollwitzer, Mario" sort="Gollwitzer, Mario" uniqKey="Gollwitzer M" first="Mario" last="Gollwitzer">Mario Gollwitzer</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Psychology, Philipps‐University Marburg, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Staubach, Miriam" sort="Staubach, Miriam" uniqKey="Staubach M" first="Miriam" last="Staubach">Miriam Staubach</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Koblenz‐Landau, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schmitt, Manfred" sort="Schmitt, Manfred" uniqKey="Schmitt M" first="Manfred" last="Schmitt">Manfred Schmitt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Koblenz‐Landau, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:42EC6A395F2F45EF190E3215F54DFDA69CE76752</idno><date when="2011" year="2011">2011</date><idno type="doi">10.1002/per.800</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/42EC6A395F2F45EF190E3215F54DFDA69CE76752/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001374</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001374</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Justice sensitivity and the processing of justice‐related information</title><author><name sortKey="Baumert, Anna" sort="Baumert, Anna" uniqKey="Baumert A" first="Anna" last="Baumert">Anna Baumert</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Koblenz‐Landau, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Koblenz‐Landau, Fortstrasse 7, Landau 76829, Germany.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gollwitzer, Mario" sort="Gollwitzer, Mario" uniqKey="Gollwitzer M" first="Mario" last="Gollwitzer">Mario Gollwitzer</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Psychology, Philipps‐University Marburg, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Staubach, Miriam" sort="Staubach, Miriam" uniqKey="Staubach M" first="Miriam" last="Staubach">Miriam Staubach</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Koblenz‐Landau, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schmitt, Manfred" sort="Schmitt, Manfred" uniqKey="Schmitt M" first="Manfred" last="Schmitt">Manfred Schmitt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Koblenz‐Landau, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">European Journal of Personality</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Eur. J. Pers.</title><idno type="ISSN">0890-2070</idno><idno type="eISSN">1099-0984</idno><imprint><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><pubPlace>Chichester, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2011-09">2011-09</date><biblScope unit="volume">25</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="386">386</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="397">397</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0890-2070</idno></series><idno type="istex">42EC6A395F2F45EF190E3215F54DFDA69CE76752</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/per.800</idno><idno type="ArticleID">PER800</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0890-2070</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>attention</term><term>interpretation</term><term>memory</term><term>personality‐congruent information processing</term><term>social justice research</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">We investigated how Justice Sensitivity (JS) shapes the processing of justice‐related information. We proposed that due to frequently perceiving and ruminating about injustices, persons high in JS develop highly accessible and differentiated injustice concepts that shape attention, interpretation and memory for justice‐related information. Three studies provided evidence for these assumptions. After witnessing injustice, persons high in JS attended more strongly to unjust stimuli than to negative control stimuli (Study1) and interpreted an ambiguous situation as less just than persons low in JS (Study2). Finally, they displayed a memory advantage for unjust information (Study3). Results suggest that JS involves the availability and accessibility of injustice concepts as parameters of cognitive functioning and offer explanations for effects of JS on justice‐related behaviour. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Anna Baumert</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Psychology, University of Koblenz‐Landau, Germany</json:string><json:string>Department of Psychology, University of Koblenz‐Landau, Fortstrasse 7, Landau 76829, Germany.</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Mario Gollwitzer</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Psychology, Philipps‐University Marburg, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Miriam Staubach</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Psychology, University of Koblenz‐Landau, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Manfred Schmitt</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Psychology, University of Koblenz‐Landau, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>personality‐congruent information processing</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>social justice research</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>attention</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>interpretation</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>memory</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>PER800</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>We investigated how Justice Sensitivity (JS) shapes the processing of justice‐related information. We proposed that due to frequently perceiving and ruminating about injustices, persons high in JS develop highly accessible and differentiated injustice concepts that shape attention, interpretation and memory for justice‐related information. Three studies provided evidence for these assumptions. After witnessing injustice, persons high in JS attended more strongly to unjust stimuli than to negative control stimuli (Study1) and interpreted an ambiguous situation as less just than persons low in JS (Study2). Finally, they displayed a memory advantage for unjust information (Study3). Results suggest that JS involves the availability and accessibility of injustice concepts as parameters of cognitive functioning and offer explanations for effects of JS on justice‐related behaviour. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.536</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>595 x 842 pts (A4)</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>928</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>9774</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>62123</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>12</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>128</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Justice sensitivity and the processing of justice‐related information</title><refBibs><json:item><host><author></author><title>Anderson, J. R.(2004).Cognitive psychology and its implications.New York:Freeman.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Aiken, L. S., &West, S. G.(1991).Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publications.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>P. Borkenau</name></json:item><json:item><name>N. Mauer</name></json:item></author><host><volume>21</volume><pages><last>189</last><first>169</first></pages><author></author><title>European Journal of Personality</title></host><title>Well‐being and the accessibility of pleasant and unpleasant concepts</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G. H. Bower</name></json:item></author><host><volume>36</volume><pages><last>148</last><first>129</first></pages><author></author><title>American Psychologist</title></host><title>Mood and memory</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G. H. Bower</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. P. Forgas</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>120</last><first>95</first></pages><author></author><title>Handbook of affect and social cognition</title></host><title>Mood and social memory</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D. E. Broadbent</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Broadbent</name></json:item></author><host><volume>2</volume><pages><last>183</last><first>165</first></pages><author></author><title>Cognition and Emotion</title></host><title>Anxiety and attentional bias: State and trait</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Life stinks [Motion picture]</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G. V. Caprara</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. Steca</name></json:item><json:item><name>D. Cervone</name></json:item><json:item><name>D. Artistico</name></json:item></author><host><volume>71</volume><pages><last>970</last><first>943</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality</title></host><title>The contribution of self‐efficacy beliefs to dispositional shyness: On social‐cognitive systems and the development of personality dispositions</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D. Cervone</name></json:item></author><host><volume>111</volume><pages><last>204</last><first>183</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychological Review</title></host><title>The architecture of personality</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Cervone, D., &Shoda, Y.(1999).The coherence of personality.New York:Guilford Press.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. T. H. Chi</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. J. Feltovich</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. Glaser</name></json:item></author><host><volume>5</volume><pages><last>125</last><first>121</first></pages><author></author><title>Cognitive Science</title></host><title>Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>A. M. Collins</name></json:item><json:item><name>E. F. Loftus</name></json:item></author><host><volume>82</volume><pages><last>428</last><first>407</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychological Review</title></host><title>A spreading‐activation theory of semantic processing</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Cowan, N.(1995).Attention and memory: An integrated framework.New York, NY:Oxford University Press.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C. Dalbert</name></json:item><json:item><name>L. Montada</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Schmitt</name></json:item></author><host><volume>29</volume><pages><last>615</last><first>596</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychologische Beiträge</title></host><title>Glaube an eine gerechte Welt als Motiv: Validierungskorrelate zweier Skalen [Belief in a just world: Correlations of two scales with validation criteria]</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Y. Dar</name></json:item><json:item><name>N. Resh</name></json:item></author><host><volume>31</volume><pages><last>81</last><first>63</first></pages><author></author><title>European Journal of Social Psychology</title></host><title>Exploring the multifaceted structure of sense of deprivation</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>P. G. Devine</name></json:item></author><host><volume>56</volume><pages><last>18</last><first>5</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>Steorotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C. A. Erdley</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. R. D'Agostino</name></json:item></author><host><volume>54</volume><pages><last>747</last><first>741</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>Cognitive and affective components of automatic priming effects</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. H. Fazio</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>97</last><first>74</first></pages><author></author><title>Research methods in personality and social psychology</title></host><title>A practical guide to the use of response latency in social psychological research</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Witness [Motion picture]</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D. Fetchenhauer</name></json:item><json:item><name>X. Huang</name></json:item></author><host><volume>36</volume><pages><last>1029</last><first>1015</first></pages><author></author><title>Personality and Individual Differences</title></host><title>Justice sensitivity and distributive decisions in experimental games</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>W. Fleeson</name></json:item></author><host><volume>80</volume><pages><last>1027</last><first>1011</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>Toward a structure‐ and process‐integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. Folger</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. Cropanzano</name></json:item><json:item><name>B. Goldman</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>245</last><first>215</first></pages><author></author><title>Handbook of organizational justice</title></host><title>What is the relationship between justice and morality?</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C. L. Hafer</name></json:item></author><host><volume>79</volume><pages><last>173</last><first>165</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>Do innocent victims threaten the belief in a just world? Evidence from a modified Stroop task</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C. L. Hafer</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>126</last><first>109</first></pages><author></author><title>The justice motive in everyday life</title></host><title>Why we reject innocent victims</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Hager, W., &Hasselhorn, M.(1994).Handbuch deutschsprachiger Wortnormen [Handbook of German word norms].Göttingen:Hogrefe.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. Haidt</name></json:item></author><host><volume>108</volume><pages><last>834</last><first>814</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychological Review</title></host><title>The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Hautus</name></json:item></author><host><volume>27</volume><pages><last>51</last><first>46</first></pages><author></author><title>Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers</title></host><title>Corrections for extreme proportions and their biasing effects on estimated values of d′</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D. A. Hershey</name></json:item><json:item><name>D. A. Walsh</name></json:item><json:item><name>S. J. Read</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. S. Chulef</name></json:item></author><host><volume>46</volume><pages><last>101</last><first>77</first></pages><author></author><title>Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes</title></host><title>The effects of expertise on financial problem solving: Evidence for goal‐directed, problem‐solving scripts</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>E. T. Higgins</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>168</last><first>133</first></pages><author></author><title>Social Psychology Handbook of Basic Principles</title></host><title>Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>E. T. Higgins</name></json:item><json:item><name>G. King</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>122</last><first>69</first></pages><author></author><title>Personality, cognition, and social interaction</title></host><title>Accessibility of social constructs: Information‐processing consequences of individual and contextual variability</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>E. T. Higgins</name></json:item><json:item><name>W. S. Rholes</name></json:item><json:item><name>C. R. Jones</name></json:item></author><host><volume>13</volume><pages><last>154</last><first>141</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Experimental Social Psychology</title></host><title>Category accessibility and impression formation</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Jäger, A. O., &Althoff, K.(1994).Der WILDE‐Intelligenz‐Test (WIT). Ein Strukturdiagnostikum [WILDE‐Intelligence‐Test].Göttingen:Hogrefe.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Lerner, M. J.(1980).The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion.New York:Plenum.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. J. Lerner</name></json:item><json:item><name>D. T. Miller</name></json:item></author><host><volume>85</volume><pages><last>1051</last><first>1030</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychological Bulletin</title></host><title>Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L. Lovas</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. Wolt</name></json:item></author><host><volume>44</volume><pages><last>131</last><first>125</first></pages><author></author><title>Studia Psychologica</title></host><title>Sensitivity to injustice in the context of some personality traits</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C. MacLeod</name></json:item><json:item><name>E. Rutherford</name></json:item><json:item><name>L. Campbell</name></json:item><json:item><name>G. Ebsworthy</name></json:item><json:item><name>L. Holker</name></json:item></author><host><volume>111</volume><pages><last>123</last><first>107</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Abnormal Psychology</title></host><title>Selective attention and emotional vulnerability: Assessing the causal basis of their association through the experimental manipulation of attentional bias</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C. MacLeod</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. Mathews</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. Tata</name></json:item></author><host><volume>95</volume><pages><last>20</last><first>15</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Abnormal Psychology</title></host><title>Attentional bias in emotional disorders</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Macmillan, N. A., &Creelman, C. D.(1991).Detection theory: A user's guide.Cambridge:University Press.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. A. Marshall</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. D. Brown</name></json:item></author><host><volume>32</volume><pages><last>1113</last><first>1100</first></pages><author></author><title>Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin</title></host><title>Trait aggressiveness and situational provocation: A test of the traits as situational sensitivities (TASS) model</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>A. Mathews</name></json:item><json:item><name>C. MacLeod</name></json:item></author><host><volume>45</volume><pages><last>50</last><first>25</first></pages><author></author><title>Annual Review of Psychology</title></host><title>Cognitive approaches to emotion and emotional disorders</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>W. Mischel</name></json:item></author><host><volume>80</volume><pages><last>283</last><first>252</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychological Review</title></host><title>Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C. Mohiyeddini</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Schmitt</name></json:item></author><host><volume>10</volume><pages><last>352</last><first>333</first></pages><author></author><title>Social Justice Research</title></host><title>Sensitivity to befallen injustice and reactions to unfair treatment in a laboratory situation</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L. Montada</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>268</last><first>255</first></pages><author></author><title>Distributive and procedural justice. Research and applications</title></host><title>Justice conflicts and the justice of conflict resolution</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L. R. Peterson</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. J. Peterson</name></json:item></author><host><volume>58</volume><pages><last>198</last><first>193</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Experimental Psychology</title></host><title>Short‐term retention of individual verbal items</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Power, M., &Dalgleish, T.(1997).Cognition and emotion: From order to disorder.Hove, England:Psychology Press.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>A. Richards</name></json:item><json:item><name>C. C. French</name></json:item></author><host><volume>45</volume><pages><last>525</last><first>503</first></pages><author></author><title>Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology</title></host><title>An anxiety‐related bias in semantic activation when processing threat/neutral homographs</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C. L. Rusting</name></json:item></author><host><volume>124</volume><pages><last>196</last><first>165</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychological Bulletin</title></host><title>Personality, mood, and cognitive processing of emotional information: Three conceptual frameworks</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Schmitt</name></json:item></author><host><volume>21</volume><pages><last>20</last><first>3</first></pages><author></author><title>Personality and Individual Differences</title></host><title>Individual differences in Sensitivity to Befallen Injustice (SBI)</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Schmitt</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>215</last><first>187</first></pages><author></author><title>Responses to victimization and belief in a just world</title></host><title>Methodological strategies in research to validate measures of belief in a just world</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Schmitt</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. Baumert</name></json:item><json:item><name>D. Fetchenhauer</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Gollwitzer</name></json:item><json:item><name>T. Rothmund</name></json:item><json:item><name>T. Schlösser</name></json:item></author><host><volume>60</volume><pages><last>22</last><first>8</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychologische Rundschau</title></host><title>Sensibilität für Ungerechtigkeit [Sensitivity to injustice]</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Schmitt</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. Baumert</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Gollwitzer</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Maes</name></json:item></author><host><volume>23</volume><pages><last>238</last><first>211</first></pages><author></author><title>Social Justice Research</title></host><title>The Justice Sensitivity Inventory: Factorial validity, location in the personality facet space, demographic pattern, and normative data</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Schmitt</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Dörfel</name></json:item></author><host><volume>29</volume><pages><last>453</last><first>443</first></pages><author></author><title>European Journal of Social Psychology</title></host><title>Effects of justice sensitivity and procedural injustice in the workplace on job satisfaction and psychosomatic well‐being</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Schmitt</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Eid</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Maes</name></json:item></author><host><volume>29</volume><pages><last>147</last><first>141</first></pages><author></author><title>Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin</title></host><title>Synergistic person x situation interaction in distributive justice behavior</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Schmitt</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Gollwitzer</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Maes</name></json:item><json:item><name>D. Arbach</name></json:item></author><host><volume>21</volume><pages><last>211</last><first>202</first></pages><author></author><title>European Journal of Psychological Assessment</title></host><title>Justice sensitivity: Assessment and location in the personality space</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Gerechtigkeit als innerdeutsches Problem: Analyse der Messeigenschaften von Messinstrumenten für Einstellungen zu Verteilungsprinzipien, Ungerechtigkeitssensibilität und Glaube an eine gerechte Welt. [Justice in united Germany: Measures for attitudes towards distribution principles, justice sensitivity, and belief in a just world]</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Schmitt</name></json:item><json:item><name>C. Mohiyeddini</name></json:item></author><host><volume>9</volume><pages><last>238</last><first>223</first></pages><author></author><title>Social Justice Research</title></host><title>Sensitivity to befallen injustice and reactions to a real life disadvantage</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. J. Schmitt</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. Neumann</name></json:item><json:item><name>L. Montada</name></json:item></author><host><volume>8</volume><pages><last>407</last><first>385</first></pages><author></author><title>Social Justice Research</title></host><title>Dispositional sensitivity to befallen injustice</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>S. C. Schmukle</name></json:item></author><host><volume>19</volume><pages><last>605</last><first>595</first></pages><author></author><title>European Journal of Personality</title></host><title>Unreliability of the dot probe task</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>W. Schneider</name></json:item><json:item><name>D. F. Bjorklund</name></json:item></author><host><volume>63</volume><pages><last>473</last><first>461</first></pages><author></author><title>Child Development</title></host><title>Expertise, aptitude, and strategic remembering</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. C. Shaw</name></json:item><json:item><name>E. Wild</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. A. Colquitt</name></json:item></author><host><volume>88</volume><pages><last>458</last><first>444</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Applied Psychology</title></host><title>To justify or excuse? A meta‐analytic review of the effects of explanations</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>E. R. Smith</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. DeCoster</name></json:item></author><host><volume>4</volume><pages><last>131</last><first>108</first></pages><author></author><title>Personality and Social Psychology Review</title></host><title>Dual‐process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>T. K. Srull</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. S. Wyer Jr.</name></json:item></author><host><volume>37</volume><pages><last>1672</last><first>1660</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>T. K. Srull</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. S. Wyer Jr.</name></json:item></author><host><volume>38</volume><pages><last>856</last><first>841</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>Category accessibility and social perception: Some implications for the study of person memory and interpersonal judgments</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>H. Stanislaw</name></json:item><json:item><name>N. Todorov</name></json:item></author><host><volume>31</volume><pages><last>149</last><first>137</first></pages><author></author><title>Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers</title></host><title>Calculation of signal detection theory measures</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Thurstone, L. L.(1938).Primary mental abilities.Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>K. van den Bos</name></json:item></author><host><volume>85</volume><pages><last>498</last><first>482</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>On the subjective quality of social justice: The role of affect as information in the psychology of justice judgments</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>K. van den Bos</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Ham</name></json:item><json:item><name>E. A. Lind</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Simonis</name></json:item><json:item><name>W. J. van Essen</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Rijpkema</name></json:item></author><host><volume>44</volume><pages><last>219</last><first>201</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Experimental Social Psychology</title></host><title>Justice and the human alarm system: The impact of exclamation points and flashing lights on the justice judgment process</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>K. van den Bos</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Maas</name></json:item><json:item><name>I. Waldring</name></json:item><json:item><name>G. P. Semin</name></json:item></author><host><volume>16</volume><pages><last>168</last><first>151</first></pages><author></author><title>Social Justice Research</title></host><title>Toward understanding the psychology of reactions to perceived fairness: The role of affect intensity</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. M. G. Williams</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. Mathews</name></json:item><json:item><name>C. MacLeod</name></json:item></author><host><volume>120</volume><pages><last>24</last><first>3</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychological Bulletin</title></host><title>The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Williams, J. M. G.,Watts, F. N.,MacLeod, C., &Mathews, A.(1997).Cognitive psychology and emotional disorders.Chichester, England:Wiley.</title></host></json:item></refBibs><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>25</volume><publisherId><json:string>PER</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>12</total><last>397</last><first>386</first></pages><issn><json:string>0890-2070</json:string></issn><issue>5</issue><subject><json:item><value>Research Article</value></json:item></subject><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1099-0984</json:string></eissn><title>European Journal of Personality</title><doi><json:string>10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0984</json:string></doi></host><categories><wos><json:string>social science</json:string><json:string>psychology, social</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>health sciences</json:string><json:string>psychology & cognitive sciences</json:string><json:string>social psychology</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>2011</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2011</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1002/per.800</json:string></doi><id>42EC6A395F2F45EF190E3215F54DFDA69CE76752</id><score>0.056773853</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/42EC6A395F2F45EF190E3215F54DFDA69CE76752/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/42EC6A395F2F45EF190E3215F54DFDA69CE76752/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/42EC6A395F2F45EF190E3215F54DFDA69CE76752/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Justice sensitivity and the processing of justice‐related information</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><pubPlace>Chichester, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p></availability><date>2011</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Justice sensitivity and the processing of justice‐related information</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Anna</forename><surname>Baumert</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Koblenz‐Landau, Germany</affiliation><affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Koblenz‐Landau, Fortstrasse 7, Landau 76829, Germany.</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">Mario</forename><surname>Gollwitzer</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Psychology, Philipps‐University Marburg, Germany</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-3"><persName><forename type="first">Miriam</forename><surname>Staubach</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Koblenz‐Landau, Germany</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-4"><persName><forename type="first">Manfred</forename><surname>Schmitt</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Koblenz‐Landau, Germany</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">European Journal of Personality</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Eur. J. Pers.</title><idno type="pISSN">0890-2070</idno><idno type="eISSN">1099-0984</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0984</idno><imprint><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><pubPlace>Chichester, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2011-09"></date><biblScope unit="volume">25</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="386">386</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="397">397</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">42EC6A395F2F45EF190E3215F54DFDA69CE76752</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/per.800</idno><idno type="ArticleID">PER800</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2011</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>We investigated how Justice Sensitivity (JS) shapes the processing of justice‐related information. We proposed that due to frequently perceiving and ruminating about injustices, persons high in JS develop highly accessible and differentiated injustice concepts that shape attention, interpretation and memory for justice‐related information. Three studies provided evidence for these assumptions. After witnessing injustice, persons high in JS attended more strongly to unjust stimuli than to negative control stimuli (Study1) and interpreted an ambiguous situation as less just than persons low in JS (Study2). Finally, they displayed a memory advantage for unjust information (Study3). Results suggest that JS involves the availability and accessibility of injustice concepts as parameters of cognitive functioning and offer explanations for effects of JS on justice‐related behaviour. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p></abstract><textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>keywords</head><item><term>personality‐congruent information processing</term></item><item><term>social justice research</term></item><item><term>attention</term></item><item><term>interpretation</term></item><item><term>memory</term></item></list></keywords></textClass><textClass><keywords scheme="Journal Subject"><list><head>article-category</head><item><term>Research Article</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2010-03-19">Received</change><change when="2010-09-24">Registration</change><change when="2011-09">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/42EC6A395F2F45EF190E3215F54DFDA69CE76752/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisherName><publisherLoc>Chichester, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi registered="yes">10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0984</doi><issn type="print">0890-2070</issn><issn type="electronic">1099-0984</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="PER"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" xml:lang="en" sort="EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY">European Journal of Personality</title><title type="short">Eur. J. Pers.</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="50"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1002/per.v25.5</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="25">25</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">5</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2011-09">September/October 2011</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="90" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1002/per.800</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="PER800"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="12"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Research Article</title><title type="tocHeading1">Research Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="manuscriptReceived" date="2010-03-19"></event><event type="manuscriptRevised" date="2010-09-17"></event><event type="manuscriptAccepted" date="2010-09-24"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:JWSART34_TO_WML3G version:2.10 mode:FullText" date="2011-09-21"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2010-11-09"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2010-11-09"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2011-09-21"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-02-06"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">386</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">397</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Department of Psychology, University of Koblenz‐Landau, Fortstrasse 7, Landau 76829, Germany.</correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:PER.PER800.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="2"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="3"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="70"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" xml:lang="en">Justice sensitivity and the processing of justice‐related information</title><title type="short" xml:lang="en">Justice sensitivity and information processing</title></titleGroup><creators><creator xml:id="au1" creatorRole="author" affiliationRef="#af1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Anna</givenNames><familyName>Baumert</familyName></personName><contactDetails><email normalForm="baumert@uni-landau.de">baumert@uni‐landau.de</email></contactDetails></creator><creator xml:id="au2" creatorRole="author" affiliationRef="#af2"><personName><givenNames>Mario</givenNames><familyName>Gollwitzer</familyName></personName></creator><creator xml:id="au3" creatorRole="author" affiliationRef="#af1"><personName><givenNames>Miriam</givenNames><familyName>Staubach</familyName></personName></creator><creator xml:id="au4" creatorRole="author" affiliationRef="#af1"><personName><givenNames>Manfred</givenNames><familyName>Schmitt</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="af1" countryCode="DE" type="organization"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Koblenz‐Landau, Germany</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="af2" countryCode="DE" type="organization"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Psychology, Philipps‐University Marburg, Germany</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en" type="author"><keyword xml:id="kwd1">personality‐congruent information processing</keyword><keyword xml:id="kwd2">social justice research</keyword><keyword xml:id="kwd3">attention</keyword><keyword xml:id="kwd4">interpretation</keyword><keyword xml:id="kwd5">memory</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p>We investigated how Justice Sensitivity (JS) shapes the processing of justice‐related information. We proposed that due to frequently perceiving and ruminating about injustices, persons high in JS develop highly accessible and differentiated injustice concepts that shape attention, interpretation and memory for justice‐related information. Three studies provided evidence for these assumptions. After witnessing injustice, persons high in JS attended more strongly to unjust stimuli than to negative control stimuli (Study1) and interpreted an ambiguous situation as less just than persons low in JS (Study2). Finally, they displayed a memory advantage for unjust information (Study3). Results suggest that JS involves the availability and accessibility of injustice concepts as parameters of cognitive functioning and offer explanations for effects of JS on justice‐related behaviour. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Justice sensitivity and the processing of justice‐related information</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Justice sensitivity and information processing</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Justice sensitivity and the processing of justice‐related information</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Anna</namePart><namePart type="family">Baumert</namePart><affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Koblenz‐Landau, Germany</affiliation><affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Koblenz‐Landau, Fortstrasse 7, Landau 76829, Germany.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Mario</namePart><namePart type="family">Gollwitzer</namePart><affiliation>Department of Psychology, Philipps‐University Marburg, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Miriam</namePart><namePart type="family">Staubach</namePart><affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Koblenz‐Landau, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Manfred</namePart><namePart type="family">Schmitt</namePart><affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Koblenz‐Landau, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Chichester, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2011-09</dateIssued><dateCaptured encoding="w3cdtf">2010-03-19</dateCaptured><dateValid encoding="w3cdtf">2010-09-24</dateValid><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="figures">2</extent><extent unit="tables">3</extent><extent unit="references">70</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">We investigated how Justice Sensitivity (JS) shapes the processing of justice‐related information. We proposed that due to frequently perceiving and ruminating about injustices, persons high in JS develop highly accessible and differentiated injustice concepts that shape attention, interpretation and memory for justice‐related information. Three studies provided evidence for these assumptions. After witnessing injustice, persons high in JS attended more strongly to unjust stimuli than to negative control stimuli (Study1) and interpreted an ambiguous situation as less just than persons low in JS (Study2). Finally, they displayed a memory advantage for unjust information (Study3). Results suggest that JS involves the availability and accessibility of injustice concepts as parameters of cognitive functioning and offer explanations for effects of JS on justice‐related behaviour. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>personality‐congruent information processing</topic><topic>social justice research</topic><topic>attention</topic><topic>interpretation</topic><topic>memory</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>European Journal of Personality</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Eur. J. Pers.</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Research Article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0890-2070</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1099-0984</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0984</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">PER</identifier><part><date>2011</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>25</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>5</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>386</start><end>397</end><total>12</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">42EC6A395F2F45EF190E3215F54DFDA69CE76752</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1002/per.800</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">PER800</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Rhénanie/explor/UnivTrevesV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001374 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001374 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Rhénanie
|area= UnivTrevesV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:42EC6A395F2F45EF190E3215F54DFDA69CE76752
|texte= Justice sensitivity and the processing of justice‐related information
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |