The emotional and cognitive components of trait anxiety: A latent state-trait model
Identifieur interne : 001255 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001254; suivant : 001256The emotional and cognitive components of trait anxiety: A latent state-trait model
Auteurs : Rolf Steyer ; Peter Schwenkmezger ; Angela AuerSource :
- Personality and Individual Differences [ 0191-8869 ] ; 1990.
Abstract
A cross-validation of the latent state-trait anxiety (LSTA) model proposed by Steyer, Majcen, Schwenkmezger & Buchner (Anxiety Research, 1, 281–299, 1989) for test halves created from items of the German version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Laux, Glanzmann, Schaffner & Spielberger, 1981) fails. It is argued that the reasons for this failure are the heterogeneity of the items of the trait anxiety inventory and the fact that the trait inventory contains more ‘cognitive’ items than the state inventory. These arguments are supported by further analyses of the cross-validation data. If the trait test halves are replaced by new test halves which are constructed only from ‘emotional’ items, the LSTA model does not have to be rejected. If, however, the trait test halves are constructed only from ‘cognitive’ items, the model again has to be rejected. Theoretical parsimony is suggested as a general methodological principle. This principle is realized in the latent state-trait anxiety model because, instead of assuming different latent traits for the state and trait test halves, this model postulates only one single latent trait which conjoins the two different kinds of manifest variables.
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/0191-8869(90)90004-B
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:00941D2D4444C33C6A59E0C54F52813B729379C1Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>The emotional and cognitive components of trait anxiety: A latent state-trait model</title><author><name sortKey="Steyer, Rolf" sort="Steyer, Rolf" uniqKey="Steyer R" first="Rolf" last="Steyer">Rolf Steyer</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Trier, Fachbereich I—Psychologie, Postfach 3825, D-5500 Trier, West Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schwenkmezger, Peter" sort="Schwenkmezger, Peter" uniqKey="Schwenkmezger P" first="Peter" last="Schwenkmezger">Peter Schwenkmezger</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Trier, Fachbereich I—Psychologie, Postfach 3825, D-5500 Trier, West Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Auer, Angela" sort="Auer, Angela" uniqKey="Auer A" first="Angela" last="Auer">Angela Auer</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Trier, Fachbereich I—Psychologie, Postfach 3825, D-5500 Trier, West Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:00941D2D4444C33C6A59E0C54F52813B729379C1</idno><date when="1990" year="1990">1990</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/0191-8869(90)90004-B</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/00941D2D4444C33C6A59E0C54F52813B729379C1/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001255</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001255</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">The emotional and cognitive components of trait anxiety: A latent state-trait model</title><author><name sortKey="Steyer, Rolf" sort="Steyer, Rolf" uniqKey="Steyer R" first="Rolf" last="Steyer">Rolf Steyer</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Trier, Fachbereich I—Psychologie, Postfach 3825, D-5500 Trier, West Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schwenkmezger, Peter" sort="Schwenkmezger, Peter" uniqKey="Schwenkmezger P" first="Peter" last="Schwenkmezger">Peter Schwenkmezger</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Trier, Fachbereich I—Psychologie, Postfach 3825, D-5500 Trier, West Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Auer, Angela" sort="Auer, Angela" uniqKey="Auer A" first="Angela" last="Auer">Angela Auer</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Trier, Fachbereich I—Psychologie, Postfach 3825, D-5500 Trier, West Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Personality and Individual Differences</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">PAID</title><idno type="ISSN">0191-8869</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1990">1990</date><biblScope unit="volume">11</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="125">125</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="134">134</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0191-8869</idno></series><idno type="istex">00941D2D4444C33C6A59E0C54F52813B729379C1</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/0191-8869(90)90004-B</idno><idno type="PII">0191-8869(90)90004-B</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0191-8869</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">A cross-validation of the latent state-trait anxiety (LSTA) model proposed by Steyer, Majcen, Schwenkmezger & Buchner (Anxiety Research, 1, 281–299, 1989) for test halves created from items of the German version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Laux, Glanzmann, Schaffner & Spielberger, 1981) fails. It is argued that the reasons for this failure are the heterogeneity of the items of the trait anxiety inventory and the fact that the trait inventory contains more ‘cognitive’ items than the state inventory. These arguments are supported by further analyses of the cross-validation data. If the trait test halves are replaced by new test halves which are constructed only from ‘emotional’ items, the LSTA model does not have to be rejected. If, however, the trait test halves are constructed only from ‘cognitive’ items, the model again has to be rejected. Theoretical parsimony is suggested as a general methodological principle. This principle is realized in the latent state-trait anxiety model because, instead of assuming different latent traits for the state and trait test halves, this model postulates only one single latent trait which conjoins the two different kinds of manifest variables.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>elsevier</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Rolf Steyer</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Trier, Fachbereich I—Psychologie, Postfach 3825, D-5500 Trier, West Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Peter Schwenkmezger</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Trier, Fachbereich I—Psychologie, Postfach 3825, D-5500 Trier, West Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Angela Auer</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Trier, Fachbereich I—Psychologie, Postfach 3825, D-5500 Trier, West Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>Full-length article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>A cross-validation of the latent state-trait anxiety (LSTA) model proposed by Steyer, Majcen, Schwenkmezger & Buchner (Anxiety Research, 1, 281–299, 1989) for test halves created from items of the German version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Laux, Glanzmann, Schaffner & Spielberger, 1981) fails. It is argued that the reasons for this failure are the heterogeneity of the items of the trait anxiety inventory and the fact that the trait inventory contains more ‘cognitive’ items than the state inventory. These arguments are supported by further analyses of the cross-validation data. If the trait test halves are replaced by new test halves which are constructed only from ‘emotional’ items, the LSTA model does not have to be rejected. If, however, the trait test halves are constructed only from ‘cognitive’ items, the model again has to be rejected. Theoretical parsimony is suggested as a general methodological principle. This principle is realized in the latent state-trait anxiety model because, instead of assuming different latent traits for the state and trait test halves, this model postulates only one single latent trait which conjoins the two different kinds of manifest variables.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.327</score><pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>540 x 778 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><keywordCount>0</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>1206</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>4107</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>25824</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>10</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>185</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>The emotional and cognitive components of trait anxiety: A latent state-trait model</title><pii><json:string>0191-8869(90)90004-B</json:string></pii><refBibs><json:item><author><json:item><name>N.S. Endler</name></json:item><json:item><name>D. Magnusson</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>Cross-cultural anxiety</title></host><serie><author></author><title>Cross-cultural anxiety</title></serie><title>Multidimensional aspects of state and trait anxiety: A cross-cultural study of Canadian and Swedish college students</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>N.S. Endler</name></json:item><json:item><name>D. Magnusson</name></json:item><json:item><name>B. Ekehammar</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Okada</name></json:item></author><host><volume>17</volume><pages><last>96</last><first>81</first></pages><author></author><title>Scandinavian Journal of Psychology</title></host><title>The multidimensionality of state and trait anxiety</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>S. Epstein</name></json:item><json:item><name>E.J. O'Brien</name></json:item></author><host><volume>98</volume><pages><last>537</last><first>513</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychological Bulletin</title></host><title>The person-situation debate in historical and current perspective</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>V. Hodapp</name></json:item></author><host><volume>141</volume><pages><last>47</last><first>27</first></pages><author></author><title>Archiv für Psychologie</title></host><title>Theoretische und empirische Analysen der Struktur der STAI-Angstskalen</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>LISREL VI: Analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Das State-Trait-Angstinventar. Theoretische Grundlagen und Handanweisung</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. Loo</name></json:item></author><host><volume>43</volume><pages><last>53</last><first>50</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality Assessment</title></host><title>The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. A-Trait Scale: Dimensions and their generalization</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R.R. Newton</name></json:item><json:item><name>V.A. Kameoka</name></json:item><json:item><name>J.W. Hoelter</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Tanaka-Matsumi</name></json:item></author><host><volume>44</volume><pages><last>193</last><first>179</first></pages><author></author><title>Educational and Psychological Measurement</title></host><title>Maximum likelihood estimation of factor structures of anxiety measures: A multiple group comparison</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. Schwarzer</name></json:item></author><host><volume>33</volume><pages><last>220</last><first>205</first></pages><author></author><title>International Review of Applied Psychology</title></host><title>Worry and emotionality as separate components in test anxiety</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Modelle der Eigenschafts- und Zustandsangst</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI Form Y)</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C.D. Spielberger</name></json:item><json:item><name>P.R. Vagg</name></json:item><json:item><name>L.R. Barker</name></json:item><json:item><name>G.W. Donham</name></json:item><json:item><name>L.G. Westberry</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>Stress and anxiety</title></host><serie><author></author><title>Stress and anxiety</title></serie><title>The factor structure of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. Steyer</name></json:item></author><host><volume>8</volume><pages><last>258</last><first>245</first></pages><author></author><title>Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie</title></host><title>Konsistenz und Spezifität: Definition zweier zentraler Begriffe der Differentiellen Psychologie und ein einfaches Modell zu ihrer Identifikation</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Experiment, Regression und Kausalität: Die logische Struktur kausaler Regressionsmodelle</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. Steyer</name></json:item></author><host><volume>3</volume><pages><last>60</last><first>25</first></pages><author></author><title>Methodika</title></host><title>Models of classical psychometric test theory as stochastic models: Representation, uniqueness, meaningfulness, identifiability, and testability</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. Steyer</name></json:item><json:item><name>A.-M. Majcen</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. Schwenkmezger</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. Buchner</name></json:item></author><host><volume>1</volume><pages><last>299</last><first>281</first></pages><author></author><title>Anxiety Research</title></host><title>A latent state-trait anxiety model and its application to determine consistency and specificity coefficients</title></json:item></refBibs><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><serie><volume>Vol. 1</volume><pages><last>172</last><first>143</first></pages><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><title>Cross-cultural anxiety</title></serie><host><volume>11</volume><pii><json:string>S0191-8869(00)X0154-7</json:string></pii><pages><last>134</last><first>125</first></pages><issn><json:string>0191-8869</json:string></issn><issue>2</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><title>Personality and Individual Differences</title><publicationDate>1990</publicationDate></host><categories><wos><json:string>social science</json:string><json:string>psychology, social</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>health sciences</json:string><json:string>psychology & cognitive sciences</json:string><json:string>social psychology</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>1990</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1990</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1016/0191-8869(90)90004-B</json:string></doi><id>00941D2D4444C33C6A59E0C54F52813B729379C1</id><score>1.8426924</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/00941D2D4444C33C6A59E0C54F52813B729379C1/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/00941D2D4444C33C6A59E0C54F52813B729379C1/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/00941D2D4444C33C6A59E0C54F52813B729379C1/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a">The emotional and cognitive components of trait anxiety: A latent state-trait model</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><availability><p>ELSEVIER</p></availability><date>1990</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a">The emotional and cognitive components of trait anxiety: A latent state-trait model</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Rolf</forename><surname>Steyer</surname></persName><affiliation>To whom all correspondence should be addressed.</affiliation><affiliation>University of Trier, Fachbereich I—Psychologie, Postfach 3825, D-5500 Trier, West Germany</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">Peter</forename><surname>Schwenkmezger</surname></persName><affiliation>University of Trier, Fachbereich I—Psychologie, Postfach 3825, D-5500 Trier, West Germany</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-3"><persName><forename type="first">Angela</forename><surname>Auer</surname></persName><affiliation>University of Trier, Fachbereich I—Psychologie, Postfach 3825, D-5500 Trier, West Germany</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Personality and Individual Differences</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">PAID</title><idno type="pISSN">0191-8869</idno><idno type="PII">S0191-8869(00)X0154-7</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1990"></date><biblScope unit="volume">11</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="125">125</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="134">134</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">00941D2D4444C33C6A59E0C54F52813B729379C1</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/0191-8869(90)90004-B</idno><idno type="PII">0191-8869(90)90004-B</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1990</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>A cross-validation of the latent state-trait anxiety (LSTA) model proposed by Steyer, Majcen, Schwenkmezger & Buchner (Anxiety Research, 1, 281–299, 1989) for test halves created from items of the German version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Laux, Glanzmann, Schaffner & Spielberger, 1981) fails. It is argued that the reasons for this failure are the heterogeneity of the items of the trait anxiety inventory and the fact that the trait inventory contains more ‘cognitive’ items than the state inventory. These arguments are supported by further analyses of the cross-validation data. If the trait test halves are replaced by new test halves which are constructed only from ‘emotional’ items, the LSTA model does not have to be rejected. If, however, the trait test halves are constructed only from ‘cognitive’ items, the model again has to be rejected. Theoretical parsimony is suggested as a general methodological principle. This principle is realized in the latent state-trait anxiety model because, instead of assuming different latent traits for the state and trait test halves, this model postulates only one single latent trait which conjoins the two different kinds of manifest variables.</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1990">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/00941D2D4444C33C6A59E0C54F52813B729379C1/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Elsevier, elements deleted: tail"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//ES//DTD journal article DTD version 4.5.2//EN//XML" URI="art452.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><converted-article version="4.5.2" docsubtype="fla"><item-info><jid>PAID</jid><aid>9090004B</aid><ce:pii>0191-8869(90)90004-B</ce:pii><ce:doi>10.1016/0191-8869(90)90004-B</ce:doi><ce:copyright type="unknown" year="1990"></ce:copyright></item-info><head><ce:title>The emotional and cognitive components of trait anxiety: A latent state-trait model</ce:title><ce:author-group><ce:author><ce:given-name>Rolf</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Steyer</ce:surname><ce:cross-ref refid="COR1"><ce:sup>∗</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>Peter</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Schwenkmezger</ce:surname></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>Angela</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Auer</ce:surname></ce:author><ce:affiliation><ce:textfn>University of Trier, Fachbereich I—Psychologie, Postfach 3825, D-5500 Trier, West Germany</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation><ce:correspondence id="COR1"><ce:label>∗</ce:label><ce:text>To whom all correspondence should be addressed.</ce:text></ce:correspondence></ce:author-group><ce:date-received day="23" month="3" year="1989"></ce:date-received><ce:abstract><ce:section-title>Abstract</ce:section-title><ce:abstract-sec><ce:simple-para>A cross-validation of the latent state-trait anxiety (LSTA) model proposed by Steyer, Majcen, Schwenkmezger & Buchner (<ce:italic>Anxiety Research</ce:italic>, <ce:bold>1</ce:bold>, 281–299, 1989) for test halves created from items of the German version of the <ce:italic>State-Trait Anxiety Inventory</ce:italic> (Laux, Glanzmann, Schaffner & Spielberger, 1981) fails. It is argued that the reasons for this failure are the heterogeneity of the items of the trait anxiety inventory and the fact that the trait inventory contains more ‘cognitive’ items than the state inventory. These arguments are supported by further analyses of the cross-validation data. If the trait test halves are replaced by new test halves which are constructed only from ‘emotional’ items, the LSTA model does not have to be rejected. If, however, the trait test halves are constructed only from ‘cognitive’ items, the model again has to be rejected. Theoretical parsimony is suggested as a general methodological principle. This principle is realized in the latent state-trait anxiety model because, instead of assuming different latent traits for the state and trait test halves, this model postulates only one single latent trait which conjoins the two different kinds of manifest variables.</ce:simple-para></ce:abstract-sec></ce:abstract></head></converted-article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo><title>The emotional and cognitive components of trait anxiety: A latent state-trait model</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA"><title>The emotional and cognitive components of trait anxiety: A latent state-trait model</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Rolf</namePart><namePart type="family">Steyer</namePart><affiliation>University of Trier, Fachbereich I—Psychologie, Postfach 3825, D-5500 Trier, West Germany</affiliation><description>To whom all correspondence should be addressed.</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Peter</namePart><namePart type="family">Schwenkmezger</namePart><affiliation>University of Trier, Fachbereich I—Psychologie, Postfach 3825, D-5500 Trier, West Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Angela</namePart><namePart type="family">Auer</namePart><affiliation>University of Trier, Fachbereich I—Psychologie, Postfach 3825, D-5500 Trier, West Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="Full-length article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1990</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1990</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">A cross-validation of the latent state-trait anxiety (LSTA) model proposed by Steyer, Majcen, Schwenkmezger & Buchner (Anxiety Research, 1, 281–299, 1989) for test halves created from items of the German version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Laux, Glanzmann, Schaffner & Spielberger, 1981) fails. It is argued that the reasons for this failure are the heterogeneity of the items of the trait anxiety inventory and the fact that the trait inventory contains more ‘cognitive’ items than the state inventory. These arguments are supported by further analyses of the cross-validation data. If the trait test halves are replaced by new test halves which are constructed only from ‘emotional’ items, the LSTA model does not have to be rejected. If, however, the trait test halves are constructed only from ‘cognitive’ items, the model again has to be rejected. Theoretical parsimony is suggested as a general methodological principle. This principle is realized in the latent state-trait anxiety model because, instead of assuming different latent traits for the state and trait test halves, this model postulates only one single latent trait which conjoins the two different kinds of manifest variables.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Personality and Individual Differences</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>PAID</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><originInfo><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1990</dateIssued></originInfo><identifier type="ISSN">0191-8869</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0191-8869(00)X0154-7</identifier><part><date>1990</date><detail type="volume"><number>11</number><caption>vol.</caption></detail><detail type="issue"><number>2</number><caption>no.</caption></detail><extent unit="issue pages"><start>101</start><end>211</end></extent><extent unit="pages"><start>125</start><end>134</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">00941D2D4444C33C6A59E0C54F52813B729379C1</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1016/0191-8869(90)90004-B</identifier><identifier type="PII">0191-8869(90)90004-B</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource>ELSEVIER</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods></metadata></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Rhénanie/explor/UnivTrevesV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001255 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001255 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Rhénanie
|area= UnivTrevesV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:00941D2D4444C33C6A59E0C54F52813B729379C1
|texte= The emotional and cognitive components of trait anxiety: A latent state-trait model
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |