Investigating Fame Judgments: On the Generality of Hypotheses, Conclusions, and Measurement Models
Identifieur interne : 001050 ( Istex/Checkpoint ); précédent : 001049; suivant : 001051Investigating Fame Judgments: On the Generality of Hypotheses, Conclusions, and Measurement Models
Auteurs : Axel Buchner [Allemagne] ; Werner Wippich [Allemagne]Source :
- Consciousness and Cognition [ 1053-8100 ] ; 1996.
Abstract
In this article, we try to clarify some of the issues raised by S. C. Draine, A. G. Greenwald, and M. R. Banaji (1996) concerning our investigation into the gender bias in fame judgments (A. Buchner & W. Wippich, 1996). First, we did not test the general hypothesis and did not draw the general conclusion that Drain et al. suggest we did. Second, we did not reject M. R. Banaji and A. G. Greenwald's (1995) assumptions about the familiarity of male and female names in the fame judgment task, but we showed how one could have come to reject it using a widespread measurement model for the process dissociation procedure. Third, we argue that the processes which Draine et al. suggest should also be included in the measurement model we used are probably negligible, and if they are not, then the validity of the results of a number of fame judgment experiments must be called into question. In general, however, we agree with what seems to be the main message ofM. R. Banaji and A. G. Greenwald's (1995) research, namely, that social categories have to be considered whenever priming is investigated within a social domain.
Url:
DOI: 10.1006/ccog.1996.0014
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:27218093631329EFEBD4032325C83DA1B07049CBLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Investigating Fame Judgments: On the Generality of Hypotheses, Conclusions, and Measurement Models</title><author><name sortKey="Buchner, Axel" sort="Buchner, Axel" uniqKey="Buchner A" first="Axel" last="Buchner">Axel Buchner</name></author><author><name sortKey="Wippich, Werner" sort="Wippich, Werner" uniqKey="Wippich W" first="Werner" last="Wippich">Werner Wippich</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:27218093631329EFEBD4032325C83DA1B07049CB</idno><date when="1996" year="1996">1996</date><idno type="doi">10.1006/ccog.1996.0014</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/27218093631329EFEBD4032325C83DA1B07049CB/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000D84</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000D84</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000C74</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">001050</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">001050</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Investigating Fame Judgments: On the Generality of Hypotheses, Conclusions, and Measurement Models</title><author><name sortKey="Buchner, Axel" sort="Buchner, Axel" uniqKey="Buchner A" first="Axel" last="Buchner">Axel Buchner</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Allemagne</country><wicri:regionArea>FB I—Psychologie, Universitat Trier, Trier, D-54286</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>54286</wicri:noRegion><wicri:noRegion>D-54286</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wippich, Werner" sort="Wippich, Werner" uniqKey="Wippich W" first="Werner" last="Wippich">Werner Wippich</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Allemagne</country><wicri:regionArea>FB I—Psychologie, Universitat Trier, Trier, D-54286</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>54286</wicri:noRegion><wicri:noRegion>D-54286</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Consciousness and Cognition</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">YCCOG</title><idno type="ISSN">1053-8100</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1996">1996</date><biblScope unit="volume">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1–2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="226">226</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="231">231</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1053-8100</idno></series><idno type="istex">27218093631329EFEBD4032325C83DA1B07049CB</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1006/ccog.1996.0014</idno><idno type="PII">S1053-8100(96)90014-8</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1053-8100</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">In this article, we try to clarify some of the issues raised by S. C. Draine, A. G. Greenwald, and M. R. Banaji (1996) concerning our investigation into the gender bias in fame judgments (A. Buchner & W. Wippich, 1996). First, we did not test the general hypothesis and did not draw the general conclusion that Drain et al. suggest we did. Second, we did not reject M. R. Banaji and A. G. Greenwald's (1995) assumptions about the familiarity of male and female names in the fame judgment task, but we showed how one could have come to reject it using a widespread measurement model for the process dissociation procedure. Third, we argue that the processes which Draine et al. suggest should also be included in the measurement model we used are probably negligible, and if they are not, then the validity of the results of a number of fame judgment experiments must be called into question. In general, however, we agree with what seems to be the main message ofM. R. Banaji and A. G. Greenwald's (1995) research, namely, that social categories have to be considered whenever priming is investigated within a social domain.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>Allemagne</li></country></list><tree><country name="Allemagne"><noRegion><name sortKey="Buchner, Axel" sort="Buchner, Axel" uniqKey="Buchner A" first="Axel" last="Buchner">Axel Buchner</name></noRegion><name sortKey="Wippich, Werner" sort="Wippich, Werner" uniqKey="Wippich W" first="Werner" last="Wippich">Werner Wippich</name></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Rhénanie/explor/UnivTrevesV1/Data/Istex/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001050 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 001050 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Rhénanie
|area= UnivTrevesV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:27218093631329EFEBD4032325C83DA1B07049CB
|texte= Investigating Fame Judgments: On the Generality of Hypotheses, Conclusions, and Measurement Models
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |