Investigating Fame Judgments: On the Generality of Hypotheses, Conclusions, and Measurement Models
Identifieur interne : 000D84 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000D83; suivant : 000D85Investigating Fame Judgments: On the Generality of Hypotheses, Conclusions, and Measurement Models
Auteurs : Axel Buchner ; Werner WippichSource :
- Consciousness and Cognition [ 1053-8100 ] ; 1996.
Abstract
In this article, we try to clarify some of the issues raised by S. C. Draine, A. G. Greenwald, and M. R. Banaji (1996) concerning our investigation into the gender bias in fame judgments (A. Buchner & W. Wippich, 1996). First, we did not test the general hypothesis and did not draw the general conclusion that Drain et al. suggest we did. Second, we did not reject M. R. Banaji and A. G. Greenwald's (1995) assumptions about the familiarity of male and female names in the fame judgment task, but we showed how one could have come to reject it using a widespread measurement model for the process dissociation procedure. Third, we argue that the processes which Draine et al. suggest should also be included in the measurement model we used are probably negligible, and if they are not, then the validity of the results of a number of fame judgment experiments must be called into question. In general, however, we agree with what seems to be the main message ofM. R. Banaji and A. G. Greenwald's (1995) research, namely, that social categories have to be considered whenever priming is investigated within a social domain.
Url:
DOI: 10.1006/ccog.1996.0014
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:27218093631329EFEBD4032325C83DA1B07049CBLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Investigating Fame Judgments: On the Generality of Hypotheses, Conclusions, and Measurement Models</title><author><name sortKey="Buchner, Axel" sort="Buchner, Axel" uniqKey="Buchner A" first="Axel" last="Buchner">Axel Buchner</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>FB I—Psychologie, Universitat Trier, Trier, D-54286, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wippich, Werner" sort="Wippich, Werner" uniqKey="Wippich W" first="Werner" last="Wippich">Werner Wippich</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>FB I—Psychologie, Universitat Trier, Trier, D-54286, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:27218093631329EFEBD4032325C83DA1B07049CB</idno><date when="1996" year="1996">1996</date><idno type="doi">10.1006/ccog.1996.0014</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/27218093631329EFEBD4032325C83DA1B07049CB/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000D84</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000D84</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Investigating Fame Judgments: On the Generality of Hypotheses, Conclusions, and Measurement Models</title><author><name sortKey="Buchner, Axel" sort="Buchner, Axel" uniqKey="Buchner A" first="Axel" last="Buchner">Axel Buchner</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>FB I—Psychologie, Universitat Trier, Trier, D-54286, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wippich, Werner" sort="Wippich, Werner" uniqKey="Wippich W" first="Werner" last="Wippich">Werner Wippich</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>FB I—Psychologie, Universitat Trier, Trier, D-54286, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Consciousness and Cognition</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">YCCOG</title><idno type="ISSN">1053-8100</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1996">1996</date><biblScope unit="volume">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1–2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="226">226</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="231">231</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1053-8100</idno></series><idno type="istex">27218093631329EFEBD4032325C83DA1B07049CB</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1006/ccog.1996.0014</idno><idno type="PII">S1053-8100(96)90014-8</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1053-8100</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">In this article, we try to clarify some of the issues raised by S. C. Draine, A. G. Greenwald, and M. R. Banaji (1996) concerning our investigation into the gender bias in fame judgments (A. Buchner & W. Wippich, 1996). First, we did not test the general hypothesis and did not draw the general conclusion that Drain et al. suggest we did. Second, we did not reject M. R. Banaji and A. G. Greenwald's (1995) assumptions about the familiarity of male and female names in the fame judgment task, but we showed how one could have come to reject it using a widespread measurement model for the process dissociation procedure. Third, we argue that the processes which Draine et al. suggest should also be included in the measurement model we used are probably negligible, and if they are not, then the validity of the results of a number of fame judgment experiments must be called into question. In general, however, we agree with what seems to be the main message ofM. R. Banaji and A. G. Greenwald's (1995) research, namely, that social categories have to be considered whenever priming is investigated within a social domain.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>elsevier</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Axel Buchner</name><affiliations><json:string>FB I—Psychologie, Universitat Trier, Trier, D-54286, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Werner Wippich</name><affiliations><json:string>FB I—Psychologie, Universitat Trier, Trier, D-54286, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>Editorial</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>In this article, we try to clarify some of the issues raised by S. C. Draine, A. G. Greenwald, and M. R. Banaji (1996) concerning our investigation into the gender bias in fame judgments (A. Buchner & W. Wippich, 1996). First, we did not test the general hypothesis and did not draw the general conclusion that Drain et al. suggest we did. Second, we did not reject M. R. Banaji and A. G. Greenwald's (1995) assumptions about the familiarity of male and female names in the fame judgment task, but we showed how one could have come to reject it using a widespread measurement model for the process dissociation procedure. Third, we argue that the processes which Draine et al. suggest should also be included in the measurement model we used are probably negligible, and if they are not, then the validity of the results of a number of fame judgment experiments must be called into question. In general, however, we agree with what seems to be the main message ofM. R. Banaji and A. G. Greenwald's (1995) research, namely, that social categories have to be considered whenever priming is investigated within a social domain.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>5.075</score><pdfVersion>1.1</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>399 x 633 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><keywordCount>0</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>1124</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>2735</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>16177</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>6</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>195</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Investigating Fame Judgments: On the Generality of Hypotheses, Conclusions, and Measurement Models</title><pii><json:string>S1053-8100(96)90014-8</json:string></pii><refBibs><json:item><author><json:item><name>M,R Banaji</name></json:item><json:item><name>A,G Greenwald</name></json:item></author><host><volume>68</volume><pages><last>198</last><first>181</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title><publicationDate>1995</publicationDate></host><title>Implicit gender stereotyping in judgments of fame</title><publicationDate>1995</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>A Buchner</name></json:item><json:item><name>E Erdfelder</name></json:item><json:item><name>B Vaterrodt-Plünnecke</name></json:item></author><host><volume>124</volume><pages><last>160</last><first>137</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Experimental Psychology: General</title><publicationDate>1995</publicationDate></host><title>Toward unbiased measurement of conscious and unconscious memory processes within the process dissociation framework</title><publicationDate>1995</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>A Buchner</name></json:item><json:item><name>W Wippich</name></json:item></author><host><volume>5</volume><pages><last>220</last><first>197</first></pages><author></author><title>Consciousness and Cognition</title><publicationDate>1996</publicationDate></host><title>Unconscious gender bias in fame judgments?</title><publicationDate>1996</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>S,C Draine</name></json:item><json:item><name>A,G Greenwald</name></json:item><json:item><name>M,R Banaji</name></json:item></author><host><volume>5</volume><pages><last>225</last><first>221</first></pages><author></author><title>Consciousness and Cognition</title><publicationDate>1996</publicationDate></host><title>Modeling unconscious gender bias in fame judgments: Finding the proper branch of the correct (multinomial) tree</title><publicationDate>1996</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J Dywan</name></json:item><json:item><name>L Jacoby</name></json:item></author><host><volume>5</volume><pages><last>387</last><first>379</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychology and Aging</title><publicationDate>1990</publicationDate></host><title>Effects of aging on source monitoring: Differences in susceptibility to false fame</title><publicationDate>1990</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><host><author><json:item><name>G Gigerenzer</name></json:item></author><title>Messung und Modellbildung in der Psychologie [Measurement and model construction in psychology]</title><publicationDate>1981</publicationDate></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L,L Jacoby</name></json:item></author><host><volume>30</volume><pages><last>541</last><first>513</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Memory and Language</title><publicationDate>1991</publicationDate></host><title>A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory</title><publicationDate>1991</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L,L Jacoby</name></json:item><json:item><name>C,M Kelley</name></json:item><json:item><name>J Brown</name></json:item><json:item><name>J Jasechko</name></json:item></author><host><volume>56</volume><pages><last>338</last><first>326</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title><publicationDate>1989</publicationDate></host><title>Becoming famous overnight: Limits on the ability to avoid unconscious influences of the past</title><publicationDate>1989</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L,L Jacoby</name></json:item><json:item><name>V Woloshyn</name></json:item><json:item><name>C,M Kelley</name></json:item></author><host><volume>118</volume><pages><last>125</last><first>115</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Experimental Psychology: General</title><publicationDate>1989</publicationDate></host><title>Becoming famous without being recognized: Unconscious influences of memory produced by dividing attention</title><publicationDate>1989</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J,M Jennings</name></json:item><json:item><name>L,L Jacoby</name></json:item></author><host><volume>8</volume><pages><last>293</last><first>283</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychology and Aging</title><publicationDate>1993</publicationDate></host><title>Automatic versus intentional uses of memory: Aging, attention, and control</title><publicationDate>1993</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>T,D Wilson</name></json:item><json:item><name>N Brekke</name></json:item></author><host><volume>116</volume><pages><last>142</last><first>117</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychological Bulletin</title><publicationDate>1994</publicationDate></host><title>Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations</title><publicationDate>1994</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><host><pages><last>172</last><first>154</first></pages><author><json:item><name>W Wippich</name></json:item></author><title>Unbewußte Effekte und Voreingenommenheiten bei Urteilen zu Personennamen [Unconscious effects and preconceptions in judgments of person names]. Zeitschrift fü r experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie</title><publicationDate>1994</publicationDate></host></json:item></refBibs><genre><json:string>editorial</json:string></genre><host><volume>5</volume><pii><json:string>S1053-8100(00)X0020-7</json:string></pii><pages><last>231</last><first>226</first></pages><issn><json:string>1053-8100</json:string></issn><issue>1–2</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><title>Consciousness and Cognition</title><publicationDate>1996</publicationDate></host><categories><wos><json:string>social science</json:string><json:string>psychology, experimental</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>health sciences</json:string><json:string>psychology & cognitive sciences</json:string><json:string>experimental psychology</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>1996</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1996</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1006/ccog.1996.0014</json:string></doi><id>27218093631329EFEBD4032325C83DA1B07049CB</id><score>1.0005665</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/27218093631329EFEBD4032325C83DA1B07049CB/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/27218093631329EFEBD4032325C83DA1B07049CB/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/27218093631329EFEBD4032325C83DA1B07049CB/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Investigating Fame Judgments: On the Generality of Hypotheses, Conclusions, and Measurement Models</title><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><availability><p>©1996 Academic Press</p></availability><date>1996</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content">Section title: Commentary</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Investigating Fame Judgments: On the Generality of Hypotheses, Conclusions, and Measurement Models</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Axel</forename><surname>Buchner</surname></persName><affiliation>FB I—Psychologie, Universitat Trier, Trier, D-54286, Germany</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">Werner</forename><surname>Wippich</surname></persName><affiliation>FB I—Psychologie, Universitat Trier, Trier, D-54286, Germany</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Consciousness and Cognition</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">YCCOG</title><idno type="pISSN">1053-8100</idno><idno type="PII">S1053-8100(00)X0020-7</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1996"></date><biblScope unit="volume">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1–2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="226">226</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="231">231</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">27218093631329EFEBD4032325C83DA1B07049CB</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1006/ccog.1996.0014</idno><idno type="PII">S1053-8100(96)90014-8</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1996</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>In this article, we try to clarify some of the issues raised by S. C. Draine, A. G. Greenwald, and M. R. Banaji (1996) concerning our investigation into the gender bias in fame judgments (A. Buchner & W. Wippich, 1996). First, we did not test the general hypothesis and did not draw the general conclusion that Drain et al. suggest we did. Second, we did not reject M. R. Banaji and A. G. Greenwald's (1995) assumptions about the familiarity of male and female names in the fame judgment task, but we showed how one could have come to reject it using a widespread measurement model for the process dissociation procedure. Third, we argue that the processes which Draine et al. suggest should also be included in the measurement model we used are probably negligible, and if they are not, then the validity of the results of a number of fame judgment experiments must be called into question. In general, however, we agree with what seems to be the main message ofM. R. Banaji and A. G. Greenwald's (1995) research, namely, that social categories have to be considered whenever priming is investigated within a social domain.</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1996">Published</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2016-11-20">References added</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2017-01-13">References added</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2017-01-16">References added</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/27218093631329EFEBD4032325C83DA1B07049CB/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Elsevier converted-article found"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//ES//DTD journal article DTD version 4.5.2//EN//XML" URI="art452.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><converted-article version="4.5.2" docsubtype="edi" xml:lang="en"><item-info><jid>YCCOG</jid><aid>90014</aid><ce:pii>S1053-8100(96)90014-8</ce:pii><ce:doi>10.1006/ccog.1996.0014</ce:doi><ce:copyright type="full-transfer" year="1996">Academic Press</ce:copyright></item-info><head><ce:dochead><ce:textfn>Commentary</ce:textfn></ce:dochead><ce:title>Investigating Fame Judgments: On the Generality of Hypotheses, Conclusions, and Measurement Models</ce:title><ce:author-group><ce:author><ce:given-name>Axel</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Buchner</ce:surname></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>Werner</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Wippich</ce:surname></ce:author><ce:affiliation><ce:textfn>FB I—Psychologie, Universitat Trier, Trier, D-54286, Germany</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation></ce:author-group><ce:abstract><ce:section-title>Abstract</ce:section-title><ce:abstract-sec><ce:simple-para>In this article, we try to clarify some of the issues raised by S. C. Draine, A. G. Greenwald, and M. R. Banaji (1996) concerning our investigation into the gender bias in fame judgments (A. Buchner & W. Wippich, 1996). First, we did not test the general hypothesis and did not draw the general conclusion that Drain et al. suggest we did. Second, we did not reject M. R. Banaji and A. G. Greenwald's (1995) assumptions about the familiarity of male and female names in the fame judgment task, but we showed how one could have come to reject it using a widespread measurement model for the process dissociation procedure. Third, we argue that the processes which Draine et al. suggest should also be included in the measurement model we used are probably negligible, and if they are not, then the validity of the results of a number of fame judgment experiments must be called into question. In general, however, we agree with what seems to be the main message ofM. R. Banaji and A. G. Greenwald's (1995) research, namely, that social categories have to be considered whenever priming is investigated within a social domain.</ce:simple-para></ce:abstract-sec></ce:abstract></head></converted-article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Investigating Fame Judgments: On the Generality of Hypotheses, Conclusions, and Measurement Models</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" lang="en" contentType="CDATA"><title>Investigating Fame Judgments: On the Generality of Hypotheses, Conclusions, and Measurement Models</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Axel</namePart><namePart type="family">Buchner</namePart><affiliation>FB I—Psychologie, Universitat Trier, Trier, D-54286, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Werner</namePart><namePart type="family">Wippich</namePart><affiliation>FB I—Psychologie, Universitat Trier, Trier, D-54286, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="editorial" displayLabel="Editorial"></genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1996</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1996</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">In this article, we try to clarify some of the issues raised by S. C. Draine, A. G. Greenwald, and M. R. Banaji (1996) concerning our investigation into the gender bias in fame judgments (A. Buchner & W. Wippich, 1996). First, we did not test the general hypothesis and did not draw the general conclusion that Drain et al. suggest we did. Second, we did not reject M. R. Banaji and A. G. Greenwald's (1995) assumptions about the familiarity of male and female names in the fame judgment task, but we showed how one could have come to reject it using a widespread measurement model for the process dissociation procedure. Third, we argue that the processes which Draine et al. suggest should also be included in the measurement model we used are probably negligible, and if they are not, then the validity of the results of a number of fame judgment experiments must be called into question. In general, however, we agree with what seems to be the main message ofM. R. Banaji and A. G. Greenwald's (1995) research, namely, that social categories have to be considered whenever priming is investigated within a social domain.</abstract><note type="content">Section title: Commentary</note><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Consciousness and Cognition</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>YCCOG</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><originInfo><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">199603</dateIssued></originInfo><identifier type="ISSN">1053-8100</identifier><identifier type="PII">S1053-8100(00)X0020-7</identifier><part><date>199603</date><detail type="volume"><number>5</number><caption>vol.</caption></detail><detail type="issue"><number>1–2</number><caption>no.</caption></detail><extent unit="issue pages"><start>1</start><end>259</end></extent><extent unit="pages"><start>226</start><end>231</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">27218093631329EFEBD4032325C83DA1B07049CB</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1006/ccog.1996.0014</identifier><identifier type="PII">S1053-8100(96)90014-8</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">©1996 Academic Press</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>ELSEVIER</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Academic Press, ©1996</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Rhénanie/explor/UnivTrevesV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000D84 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000D84 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Rhénanie
|area= UnivTrevesV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:27218093631329EFEBD4032325C83DA1B07049CB
|texte= Investigating Fame Judgments: On the Generality of Hypotheses, Conclusions, and Measurement Models
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |