Serveur d'exploration sur l'esturgeon

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Extinction vulnerability in marine populations

Identifieur interne : 001520 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001519; suivant : 001521

Extinction vulnerability in marine populations

Auteurs : Nicholas K. Dulvy ; Yvonne Sadovy ; John D. Reynolds

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:340A0DA6BCD66D4FBE3BBC23C73C9D11D425E58D

English descriptors

Abstract

Human impacts on the world's oceans have been substantial, leading to concerns about the extinction of marine taxa. We have compiled 133 local, regional and global extinctions of marine populations. There is typically a 53‐year lag between the last sighting of an organism and the reported date of the extinction at whatever scale this has occurred. Most disappearances (80%) were detected using indirect historical comparative methods, which suggests that marine extinctions may have been underestimated because of low‐detection power. Exploitation caused most marine losses at various scales (55%), followed closely by habitat loss (37%), while the remainder were linked to invasive species, climate change, pollution and disease. Several perceptions concerning the vulnerability of marine organisms appear to be too general and insufficiently conservative. Marine species cannot be considered less vulnerable on the basis of biological attributes such as high fecundity or large‐scale dispersal characteristics. For commercially exploited species, it is often argued that economic extinction of exploited populations will occur before biological extinction, but this is not the case for non‐target species caught in multispecies fisheries or species with high commercial value, especially if this value increases as species become rare. The perceived high potential for recovery, high variability and low extinction vulnerability of fish populations have been invoked to avoid listing commercial species of fishes under international threat criteria. However, we need to learn more about recovery, which may be hampered by negative population growth at small population sizes (Allee effect or depensation) or ecosystem shifts, as well as about spatial dynamics and connectivity of subpopulations before we can truly understand the nature of responses to severe depletions. The evidence suggests that fish populations do not fluctuate more than those of mammals, birds and butterflies, and that fishes may exhibit vulnerability similar to mammals, birds and butterflies. There is an urgent need for improved methods of detecting marine extinctions at various spatial scales, and for predicting the vulnerability of species.

Url:
DOI: 10.1046/j.1467-2979.2003.00105.x

Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:340A0DA6BCD66D4FBE3BBC23C73C9D11D425E58D

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Extinction vulnerability in marine populations</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Dulvy, Nicholas K" sort="Dulvy, Nicholas K" uniqKey="Dulvy N" first="Nicholas K" last="Dulvy">Nicholas K. Dulvy</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>School of Marine Science and Technology, Ridley Building, University of Newcastle, Newcastle‐upon‐Tyne NE1 7RU, UK;</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Sadovy, Yvonne" sort="Sadovy, Yvonne" uniqKey="Sadovy Y" first="Yvonne" last="Sadovy">Yvonne Sadovy</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Department of Ecology & Biodiversity, Kadoorie Biological Sciences Building, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam Road, Hong Kong;</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Reynolds, John D" sort="Reynolds, John D" uniqKey="Reynolds J" first="John D" last="Reynolds">John D. Reynolds</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Conservation, School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:340A0DA6BCD66D4FBE3BBC23C73C9D11D425E58D</idno>
<date when="2003" year="2003">2003</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1046/j.1467-2979.2003.00105.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/340A0DA6BCD66D4FBE3BBC23C73C9D11D425E58D/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001520</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001520</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Extinction vulnerability in marine populations</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Dulvy, Nicholas K" sort="Dulvy, Nicholas K" uniqKey="Dulvy N" first="Nicholas K" last="Dulvy">Nicholas K. Dulvy</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>School of Marine Science and Technology, Ridley Building, University of Newcastle, Newcastle‐upon‐Tyne NE1 7RU, UK;</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Sadovy, Yvonne" sort="Sadovy, Yvonne" uniqKey="Sadovy Y" first="Yvonne" last="Sadovy">Yvonne Sadovy</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Department of Ecology & Biodiversity, Kadoorie Biological Sciences Building, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam Road, Hong Kong;</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Reynolds, John D" sort="Reynolds, John D" uniqKey="Reynolds J" first="John D" last="Reynolds">John D. Reynolds</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Conservation, School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">Fish and Fisheries</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1467-2960</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1467-2979</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2003-03">2003-03</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="25">25</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="64">64</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">1467-2960</idno>
</series>
<idno type="istex">340A0DA6BCD66D4FBE3BBC23C73C9D11D425E58D</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1046/j.1467-2979.2003.00105.x</idno>
<idno type="ArticleID">FAF105</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">1467-2960</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Red List</term>
<term>biodiversity</term>
<term>conservation</term>
<term>detection</term>
<term>fisheries</term>
<term>recovery</term>
<term>risk</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Human impacts on the world's oceans have been substantial, leading to concerns about the extinction of marine taxa. We have compiled 133 local, regional and global extinctions of marine populations. There is typically a 53‐year lag between the last sighting of an organism and the reported date of the extinction at whatever scale this has occurred. Most disappearances (80%) were detected using indirect historical comparative methods, which suggests that marine extinctions may have been underestimated because of low‐detection power. Exploitation caused most marine losses at various scales (55%), followed closely by habitat loss (37%), while the remainder were linked to invasive species, climate change, pollution and disease. Several perceptions concerning the vulnerability of marine organisms appear to be too general and insufficiently conservative. Marine species cannot be considered less vulnerable on the basis of biological attributes such as high fecundity or large‐scale dispersal characteristics. For commercially exploited species, it is often argued that economic extinction of exploited populations will occur before biological extinction, but this is not the case for non‐target species caught in multispecies fisheries or species with high commercial value, especially if this value increases as species become rare. The perceived high potential for recovery, high variability and low extinction vulnerability of fish populations have been invoked to avoid listing commercial species of fishes under international threat criteria. However, we need to learn more about recovery, which may be hampered by negative population growth at small population sizes (Allee effect or depensation) or ecosystem shifts, as well as about spatial dynamics and connectivity of subpopulations before we can truly understand the nature of responses to severe depletions. The evidence suggests that fish populations do not fluctuate more than those of mammals, birds and butterflies, and that fishes may exhibit vulnerability similar to mammals, birds and butterflies. There is an urgent need for improved methods of detecting marine extinctions at various spatial scales, and for predicting the vulnerability of species.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<istex>
<corpusName>wiley</corpusName>
<author>
<json:item>
<name>Nicholas K Dulvy</name>
<affiliations>
<json:string>School of Marine Science and Technology, Ridley Building, University of Newcastle, Newcastle‐upon‐Tyne NE1 7RU, UK;</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<name>Yvonne Sadovy</name>
<affiliations>
<json:string>Department of Ecology & Biodiversity, Kadoorie Biological Sciences Building, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam Road, Hong Kong;</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<name>John D Reynolds</name>
<affiliations>
<json:string>Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Conservation, School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
</author>
<subject>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>biodiversity</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>conservation</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>detection</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>fisheries</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>recovery</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>Red List</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>risk</value>
</json:item>
</subject>
<articleId>
<json:string>FAF105</json:string>
</articleId>
<language>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</language>
<originalGenre>
<json:string>article</json:string>
</originalGenre>
<abstract>Human impacts on the world's oceans have been substantial, leading to concerns about the extinction of marine taxa. We have compiled 133 local, regional and global extinctions of marine populations. There is typically a 53‐year lag between the last sighting of an organism and the reported date of the extinction at whatever scale this has occurred. Most disappearances (80%) were detected using indirect historical comparative methods, which suggests that marine extinctions may have been underestimated because of low‐detection power. Exploitation caused most marine losses at various scales (55%), followed closely by habitat loss (37%), while the remainder were linked to invasive species, climate change, pollution and disease. Several perceptions concerning the vulnerability of marine organisms appear to be too general and insufficiently conservative. Marine species cannot be considered less vulnerable on the basis of biological attributes such as high fecundity or large‐scale dispersal characteristics. For commercially exploited species, it is often argued that economic extinction of exploited populations will occur before biological extinction, but this is not the case for non‐target species caught in multispecies fisheries or species with high commercial value, especially if this value increases as species become rare. The perceived high potential for recovery, high variability and low extinction vulnerability of fish populations have been invoked to avoid listing commercial species of fishes under international threat criteria. However, we need to learn more about recovery, which may be hampered by negative population growth at small population sizes (Allee effect or depensation) or ecosystem shifts, as well as about spatial dynamics and connectivity of subpopulations before we can truly understand the nature of responses to severe depletions. The evidence suggests that fish populations do not fluctuate more than those of mammals, birds and butterflies, and that fishes may exhibit vulnerability similar to mammals, birds and butterflies. There is an urgent need for improved methods of detecting marine extinctions at various spatial scales, and for predicting the vulnerability of species.</abstract>
<qualityIndicators>
<score>8</score>
<pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion>
<pdfPageSize>595 x 782 pts</pdfPageSize>
<refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative>
<abstractCharCount>2225</abstractCharCount>
<pdfWordCount>21412</pdfWordCount>
<pdfCharCount>143530</pdfCharCount>
<pdfPageCount>40</pdfPageCount>
<abstractWordCount>321</abstractWordCount>
</qualityIndicators>
<title>Extinction vulnerability in marine populations</title>
<genre>
<json:string>article</json:string>
</genre>
<host>
<volume>4</volume>
<publisherId>
<json:string>FAF</json:string>
</publisherId>
<pages>
<last>64</last>
<first>25</first>
</pages>
<issn>
<json:string>1467-2960</json:string>
</issn>
<issue>1</issue>
<genre>
<json:string>journal</json:string>
</genre>
<language>
<json:string>unknown</json:string>
</language>
<eissn>
<json:string>1467-2979</json:string>
</eissn>
<title>Fish and Fisheries</title>
<doi>
<json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1467-2979</json:string>
</doi>
</host>
<categories>
<wos>
<json:string>science</json:string>
<json:string>fisheries</json:string>
</wos>
<scienceMetrix>
<json:string>applied sciences</json:string>
<json:string>agriculture, fisheries & forestry</json:string>
<json:string>fisheries</json:string>
</scienceMetrix>
</categories>
<publicationDate>2003</publicationDate>
<copyrightDate>2003</copyrightDate>
<doi>
<json:string>10.1046/j.1467-2979.2003.00105.x</json:string>
</doi>
<id>340A0DA6BCD66D4FBE3BBC23C73C9D11D425E58D</id>
<score>0.049781926</score>
<fulltext>
<json:item>
<extension>pdf</extension>
<original>true</original>
<mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/340A0DA6BCD66D4FBE3BBC23C73C9D11D425E58D/fulltext/pdf</uri>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<extension>zip</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/zip</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/340A0DA6BCD66D4FBE3BBC23C73C9D11D425E58D/fulltext/zip</uri>
</json:item>
<istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/340A0DA6BCD66D4FBE3BBC23C73C9D11D425E58D/fulltext/tei">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Extinction vulnerability in marine populations</title>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>ISTEX</authority>
<publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<availability>
<p>WILEY</p>
</availability>
<date>2003</date>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct type="inbook">
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Extinction vulnerability in marine populations</title>
<author xml:id="author-1">
<persName>
<forename type="first">Nicholas K</forename>
<surname>Dulvy</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>School of Marine Science and Technology, Ridley Building, University of Newcastle, Newcastle‐upon‐Tyne NE1 7RU, UK;</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-2">
<persName>
<forename type="first">Yvonne</forename>
<surname>Sadovy</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Department of Ecology & Biodiversity, Kadoorie Biological Sciences Building, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam Road, Hong Kong;</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-3">
<persName>
<forename type="first">John D</forename>
<surname>Reynolds</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Conservation, School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<title level="j">Fish and Fisheries</title>
<idno type="pISSN">1467-2960</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1467-2979</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-2979</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2003-03"></date>
<biblScope unit="volume">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="25">25</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="64">64</biblScope>
</imprint>
</monogr>
<idno type="istex">340A0DA6BCD66D4FBE3BBC23C73C9D11D425E58D</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1046/j.1467-2979.2003.00105.x</idno>
<idno type="ArticleID">FAF105</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<creation>
<date>2003</date>
</creation>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
<abstract xml:lang="en">
<p>Human impacts on the world's oceans have been substantial, leading to concerns about the extinction of marine taxa. We have compiled 133 local, regional and global extinctions of marine populations. There is typically a 53‐year lag between the last sighting of an organism and the reported date of the extinction at whatever scale this has occurred. Most disappearances (80%) were detected using indirect historical comparative methods, which suggests that marine extinctions may have been underestimated because of low‐detection power. Exploitation caused most marine losses at various scales (55%), followed closely by habitat loss (37%), while the remainder were linked to invasive species, climate change, pollution and disease. Several perceptions concerning the vulnerability of marine organisms appear to be too general and insufficiently conservative. Marine species cannot be considered less vulnerable on the basis of biological attributes such as high fecundity or large‐scale dispersal characteristics. For commercially exploited species, it is often argued that economic extinction of exploited populations will occur before biological extinction, but this is not the case for non‐target species caught in multispecies fisheries or species with high commercial value, especially if this value increases as species become rare. The perceived high potential for recovery, high variability and low extinction vulnerability of fish populations have been invoked to avoid listing commercial species of fishes under international threat criteria. However, we need to learn more about recovery, which may be hampered by negative population growth at small population sizes (Allee effect or depensation) or ecosystem shifts, as well as about spatial dynamics and connectivity of subpopulations before we can truly understand the nature of responses to severe depletions. The evidence suggests that fish populations do not fluctuate more than those of mammals, birds and butterflies, and that fishes may exhibit vulnerability similar to mammals, birds and butterflies. There is an urgent need for improved methods of detecting marine extinctions at various spatial scales, and for predicting the vulnerability of species.</p>
</abstract>
<textClass xml:lang="en">
<keywords scheme="keyword">
<list>
<head>keywords</head>
<item>
<term>biodiversity</term>
</item>
<item>
<term>conservation</term>
</item>
<item>
<term>detection</term>
</item>
<item>
<term>fisheries</term>
</item>
<item>
<term>recovery</term>
</item>
<item>
<term>Red List</term>
</item>
<item>
<term>risk</term>
</item>
</list>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
<revisionDesc>
<change when="2003-03">Published</change>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
</istex:fulltextTEI>
<json:item>
<extension>txt</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>text/plain</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/340A0DA6BCD66D4FBE3BBC23C73C9D11D425E58D/fulltext/txt</uri>
</json:item>
</fulltext>
<metadata>
<istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body">
<istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration>
<istex:document>
<component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en">
<header>
<publicationMeta level="product">
<publisherInfo>
<publisherName>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisherName>
<publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc>
</publisherInfo>
<doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-2979</doi>
<issn type="print">1467-2960</issn>
<issn type="electronic">1467-2979</issn>
<idGroup>
<id type="product" value="FAF"></id>
<id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id>
</idGroup>
<titleGroup>
<title type="main" sort="FISH FISHERIES">Fish and Fisheries</title>
</titleGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="part" position="03001">
<doi origin="wiley">10.1111/faf.2003.4.issue-1</doi>
<numberingGroup>
<numbering type="journalVolume" number="4">4</numbering>
<numbering type="journalIssue" number="1">1</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<coverDate startDate="2003-03">March 2003</coverDate>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0002500" status="forIssue">
<doi origin="wiley">10.1046/j.1467-2979.2003.00105.x</doi>
<idGroup>
<id type="unit" value="FAF105"></id>
</idGroup>
<titleGroup>
<title type="tocHeading1">Reviews</title>
</titleGroup>
<eventGroup>
<event type="firstOnline" date="2003-04-22"></event>
<event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2003-04-22"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.4 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-03-30"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-25"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-17"></event>
</eventGroup>
<numberingGroup>
<numbering type="pageFirst" number="25">25</numbering>
<numbering type="pageLast" number="64">64</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<correspondenceTo> Present address: Nicholas K Dulvy, Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft Laboratory, Lowestoft, Suffolk NR33 OHT, UK 
Tel.: +44 1502 562244 
Fax: +44 1502 513865 
E‐mail:
<email>n.k.dulvy@cefas.co.uk</email>
</correspondenceTo>
<linkGroup>
<link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:FAF.FAF105.pdf"></link>
</linkGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<contentMeta>
<unparsedEditorialHistory>Received 23 July 2002 Accepted 23 Sep 2002</unparsedEditorialHistory>
<countGroup>
<count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count>
<count type="tableTotal" number="1"></count>
<count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count>
<count type="referenceTotal" number="273"></count>
<count type="wordTotal" number="25077"></count>
<count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count>
<count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count>
</countGroup>
<titleGroup>
<title type="main">Extinction vulnerability in marine populations</title>
<title type="shortAuthors">
<i>N K Dulvy</i>
et al.</title>
<title type="short">Marine extinctions</title>
</titleGroup>
<creators>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1">
<personName>
<givenNames>Nicholas K</givenNames>
<familyName>Dulvy</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2">
<personName>
<givenNames>Yvonne</givenNames>
<familyName>Sadovy</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a3">
<personName>
<givenNames>John D</givenNames>
<familyName>Reynolds</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
</creators>
<affiliationGroup>
<affiliation xml:id="a1">
<unparsedAffiliation>School of Marine Science and Technology, Ridley Building, University of Newcastle, Newcastle‐upon‐Tyne NE1 7RU, UK;</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="HK">
<unparsedAffiliation>Department of Ecology & Biodiversity, Kadoorie Biological Sciences Building, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam Road, Hong Kong;</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="GB">
<unparsedAffiliation>Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Conservation, School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
</affiliationGroup>
<keywordGroup xml:lang="en">
<keyword xml:id="k1">biodiversity</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k2">conservation</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k3">detection</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k4">fisheries</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k5">recovery</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k6">
<i>Red List</i>
</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k7">risk </keyword>
</keywordGroup>
<abstractGroup>
<abstract type="main" xml:lang="en">
<title type="main">Abstract</title>
<p>Human impacts on the world's oceans have been substantial, leading to concerns about the extinction of marine taxa. We have compiled 133 local, regional and global extinctions of marine populations. There is typically a 53‐year lag between the last sighting of an organism and the reported date of the extinction at whatever scale this has occurred. Most disappearances (80%) were detected using indirect historical comparative methods, which suggests that marine extinctions may have been underestimated because of low‐detection power. Exploitation caused most marine losses at various scales (55%), followed closely by habitat loss (37%), while the remainder were linked to invasive species, climate change, pollution and disease. Several perceptions concerning the vulnerability of marine organisms appear to be too general and insufficiently conservative. Marine species cannot be considered less vulnerable on the basis of biological attributes such as high fecundity or large‐scale dispersal characteristics. For commercially exploited species, it is often argued that economic extinction of exploited populations will occur before biological extinction, but this is not the case for non‐target species caught in multispecies fisheries or species with high commercial value, especially if this value increases as species become rare. The perceived high potential for recovery, high variability and low extinction vulnerability of fish populations have been invoked to avoid listing commercial species of fishes under international threat criteria. However, we need to learn more about recovery, which may be hampered by negative population growth at small population sizes (Allee effect or depensation) or ecosystem shifts, as well as about spatial dynamics and connectivity of subpopulations before we can truly understand the nature of responses to severe depletions. The evidence suggests that fish populations do not fluctuate more than those of mammals, birds and butterflies, and that fishes may exhibit vulnerability similar to mammals, birds and butterflies. There is an urgent need for improved methods of detecting marine extinctions at various spatial scales, and for predicting the vulnerability of species.</p>
</abstract>
</abstractGroup>
</contentMeta>
</header>
</component>
</istex:document>
</istex:metadataXml>
<mods version="3.6">
<titleInfo lang="en">
<title>Extinction vulnerability in marine populations</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en">
<title>Marine extinctions</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en">
<title>Extinction vulnerability in marine populations</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Nicholas K</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Dulvy</namePart>
<affiliation>School of Marine Science and Technology, Ridley Building, University of Newcastle, Newcastle‐upon‐Tyne NE1 7RU, UK;</affiliation>
<role>
<roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Yvonne</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Sadovy</namePart>
<affiliation>Department of Ecology & Biodiversity, Kadoorie Biological Sciences Building, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam Road, Hong Kong;</affiliation>
<role>
<roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">John D</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Reynolds</namePart>
<affiliation>Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Conservation, School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK</affiliation>
<role>
<roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm>
</place>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2003-03</dateIssued>
<edition>Received 23 July 2002 Accepted 23 Sep 2002</edition>
<copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2003</copyrightDate>
</originInfo>
<language>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription>
<internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType>
<extent unit="tables">1</extent>
<extent unit="references">273</extent>
<extent unit="words">25077</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<abstract lang="en">Human impacts on the world's oceans have been substantial, leading to concerns about the extinction of marine taxa. We have compiled 133 local, regional and global extinctions of marine populations. There is typically a 53‐year lag between the last sighting of an organism and the reported date of the extinction at whatever scale this has occurred. Most disappearances (80%) were detected using indirect historical comparative methods, which suggests that marine extinctions may have been underestimated because of low‐detection power. Exploitation caused most marine losses at various scales (55%), followed closely by habitat loss (37%), while the remainder were linked to invasive species, climate change, pollution and disease. Several perceptions concerning the vulnerability of marine organisms appear to be too general and insufficiently conservative. Marine species cannot be considered less vulnerable on the basis of biological attributes such as high fecundity or large‐scale dispersal characteristics. For commercially exploited species, it is often argued that economic extinction of exploited populations will occur before biological extinction, but this is not the case for non‐target species caught in multispecies fisheries or species with high commercial value, especially if this value increases as species become rare. The perceived high potential for recovery, high variability and low extinction vulnerability of fish populations have been invoked to avoid listing commercial species of fishes under international threat criteria. However, we need to learn more about recovery, which may be hampered by negative population growth at small population sizes (Allee effect or depensation) or ecosystem shifts, as well as about spatial dynamics and connectivity of subpopulations before we can truly understand the nature of responses to severe depletions. The evidence suggests that fish populations do not fluctuate more than those of mammals, birds and butterflies, and that fishes may exhibit vulnerability similar to mammals, birds and butterflies. There is an urgent need for improved methods of detecting marine extinctions at various spatial scales, and for predicting the vulnerability of species.</abstract>
<subject lang="en">
<genre>keywords</genre>
<topic>biodiversity</topic>
<topic>conservation</topic>
<topic>detection</topic>
<topic>fisheries</topic>
<topic>recovery</topic>
<topic>Red List</topic>
<topic>risk</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Fish and Fisheries</title>
</titleInfo>
<genre type="journal">journal</genre>
<identifier type="ISSN">1467-2960</identifier>
<identifier type="eISSN">1467-2979</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-2979</identifier>
<identifier type="PublisherID">FAF</identifier>
<part>
<date>2003</date>
<detail type="volume">
<caption>vol.</caption>
<number>4</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue">
<caption>no.</caption>
<number>1</number>
</detail>
<extent unit="pages">
<start>25</start>
<end>64</end>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="istex">340A0DA6BCD66D4FBE3BBC23C73C9D11D425E58D</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1046/j.1467-2979.2003.00105.x</identifier>
<identifier type="ArticleID">FAF105</identifier>
<recordInfo>
<recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource>
<recordOrigin>Blackwell Science Ltd</recordOrigin>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
</metadata>
<serie></serie>
</istex>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Eau/explor/EsturgeonV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001520 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001520 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Eau
   |area=    EsturgeonV1
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:340A0DA6BCD66D4FBE3BBC23C73C9D11D425E58D
   |texte=   Extinction vulnerability in marine populations
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.27.
Data generation: Sat Mar 25 15:37:54 2017. Site generation: Tue Feb 13 14:18:49 2024