Methods for studying spatial behaviour of freshwater fishes in the natural environment
Identifieur interne : 001483 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001482; suivant : 001484Methods for studying spatial behaviour of freshwater fishes in the natural environment
Auteurs : M. C. Lucas ; E. BarasSource :
- Fish and Fisheries [ 1467-2960 ] ; 2000-12-21.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Spatial behaviour of fishes in fresh and brackish water ranges in temporal scales between localized diel movements, often associated with foraging and predator evasion, to seasonal or life‐cycle related events involving movements between freshwater habitats or freshwater and marine biotopes. Recent technological advances have resulted in dramatic improvements in the range of techniques available for the study of spatial behaviour of freshwater fishes in the natural environment, and broadly may be divided into two categories: capture dependent and capture independent. The former incorporates those methods that rely on sampling marked fish (mark–recapture) or unmarked fish (density estimates, catch per unit effort) over defined scales of time and space in order to derive information on distribution and movement. Captured fish may also be tagged with transmitters that radiate energy, enabling the fish to be tracked and/or environmental data to be gathered. Biochemical analysis of samples from fish, requiring non‐destructive sampling (genetic analysis and scale microchemistry) or destructive sampling (otolith microchemistry) may also provide information on migration and ontogenetic processes. Capture independent techniques include visual observation and video techniques, hydroacoustics and automated fish counting. Catch per unit effort and mark–recapture techniques are most efficient where long‐term fishery or monitoring studies are in place and data on crude spatial and temporal scales are acceptable. They also have the advantages of low technical requirements and low equipment costs. Where specific management or ecological questions are pertinent, recapture independent techniques may be more appropriate. Telemetric methods can provide high resolution information at the individual level, while hydroacoustics is increasingly providing information at the population level in large lake and river environments. Biochemical methods are becoming increasingly useful in determining the extent of population segregation, where DNA analysis is used, and in the study of migration and ontogenetic changes in behaviour, where otolith microchemistry and stable isotope analysis is used.
Url:
DOI: 10.1046/j.1467-2979.2000.00028.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:8B0E2C7B9E237461354A1389EAEAA0FDA9D54CDCLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Methods for studying spatial behaviour of freshwater fishes in the natural environment</title><author><name sortKey="Lucas, M C" sort="Lucas, M C" uniqKey="Lucas M" first="M. C." last="Lucas">M. C. Lucas</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Biological Sciences, University of Durham, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Baras, E" sort="Baras, E" uniqKey="Baras E" first="E." last="Baras">E. Baras</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Ethology and Animal Psychology, University of Liège, 10 Chemin de la Justice, B‐4500 Tihange, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:8B0E2C7B9E237461354A1389EAEAA0FDA9D54CDC</idno><date when="2000" year="2000">2000</date><idno type="doi">10.1046/j.1467-2979.2000.00028.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/8B0E2C7B9E237461354A1389EAEAA0FDA9D54CDC/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001483</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001483</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Methods for studying spatial behaviour of freshwater fishes in the natural environment</title><author><name sortKey="Lucas, M C" sort="Lucas, M C" uniqKey="Lucas M" first="M. C." last="Lucas">M. C. Lucas</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Biological Sciences, University of Durham, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Baras, E" sort="Baras, E" uniqKey="Baras E" first="E." last="Baras">E. Baras</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Ethology and Animal Psychology, University of Liège, 10 Chemin de la Justice, B‐4500 Tihange, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Fish and Fisheries</title><idno type="ISSN">1467-2960</idno><idno type="eISSN">1467-2979</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2000-12-21">2000-12-21</date><biblScope unit="volume">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="283">283</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="316">316</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1467-2960</idno></series><idno type="istex">8B0E2C7B9E237461354A1389EAEAA0FDA9D54CDC</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1046/j.1467-2979.2000.00028.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">FAF028</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1467-2960</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>freshwater fish behaviour</term><term>hydroacoustics</term><term>migration</term><term>otolith microchemistry</term><term>tagging</term><term>telemetry</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Spatial behaviour of fishes in fresh and brackish water ranges in temporal scales between localized diel movements, often associated with foraging and predator evasion, to seasonal or life‐cycle related events involving movements between freshwater habitats or freshwater and marine biotopes. Recent technological advances have resulted in dramatic improvements in the range of techniques available for the study of spatial behaviour of freshwater fishes in the natural environment, and broadly may be divided into two categories: capture dependent and capture independent. The former incorporates those methods that rely on sampling marked fish (mark–recapture) or unmarked fish (density estimates, catch per unit effort) over defined scales of time and space in order to derive information on distribution and movement. Captured fish may also be tagged with transmitters that radiate energy, enabling the fish to be tracked and/or environmental data to be gathered. Biochemical analysis of samples from fish, requiring non‐destructive sampling (genetic analysis and scale microchemistry) or destructive sampling (otolith microchemistry) may also provide information on migration and ontogenetic processes. Capture independent techniques include visual observation and video techniques, hydroacoustics and automated fish counting. Catch per unit effort and mark–recapture techniques are most efficient where long‐term fishery or monitoring studies are in place and data on crude spatial and temporal scales are acceptable. They also have the advantages of low technical requirements and low equipment costs. Where specific management or ecological questions are pertinent, recapture independent techniques may be more appropriate. Telemetric methods can provide high resolution information at the individual level, while hydroacoustics is increasingly providing information at the population level in large lake and river environments. Biochemical methods are becoming increasingly useful in determining the extent of population segregation, where DNA analysis is used, and in the study of migration and ontogenetic changes in behaviour, where otolith microchemistry and stable isotope analysis is used.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>M.C. Lucas</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Biological Sciences, University of Durham, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>E. Baras</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Ethology and Animal Psychology, University of Liège, 10 Chemin de la Justice, B‐4500 Tihange, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>freshwater fish behaviour</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>hydroacoustics</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>migration</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>otolith microchemistry</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>tagging</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>telemetry</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>FAF028</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>miscellaneous</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Spatial behaviour of fishes in fresh and brackish water ranges in temporal scales between localized diel movements, often associated with foraging and predator evasion, to seasonal or life‐cycle related events involving movements between freshwater habitats or freshwater and marine biotopes. Recent technological advances have resulted in dramatic improvements in the range of techniques available for the study of spatial behaviour of freshwater fishes in the natural environment, and broadly may be divided into two categories: capture dependent and capture independent. The former incorporates those methods that rely on sampling marked fish (mark–recapture) or unmarked fish (density estimates, catch per unit effort) over defined scales of time and space in order to derive information on distribution and movement. Captured fish may also be tagged with transmitters that radiate energy, enabling the fish to be tracked and/or environmental data to be gathered. Biochemical analysis of samples from fish, requiring non‐destructive sampling (genetic analysis and scale microchemistry) or destructive sampling (otolith microchemistry) may also provide information on migration and ontogenetic processes. Capture independent techniques include visual observation and video techniques, hydroacoustics and automated fish counting. Catch per unit effort and mark–recapture techniques are most efficient where long‐term fishery or monitoring studies are in place and data on crude spatial and temporal scales are acceptable. They also have the advantages of low technical requirements and low equipment costs. Where specific management or ecological questions are pertinent, recapture independent techniques may be more appropriate. Telemetric methods can provide high resolution information at the individual level, while hydroacoustics is increasingly providing information at the population level in large lake and river environments. Biochemical methods are becoming increasingly useful in determining the extent of population segregation, where DNA analysis is used, and in the study of migration and ontogenetic changes in behaviour, where otolith microchemistry and stable isotope analysis is used.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8</score><pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>595 x 782 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>2204</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>21097</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>138948</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>34</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>304</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Methods for studying spatial behaviour of freshwater fishes in the natural environment</title><genre><json:string>other</json:string></genre><host><volume>1</volume><publisherId><json:string>FAF</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>34</total><last>316</last><first>283</first></pages><issn><json:string>1467-2960</json:string></issn><issue>4</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1467-2979</json:string></eissn><title>Fish and Fisheries</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1467-2979</json:string></doi></host><categories><wos><json:string>science</json:string><json:string>fisheries</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>applied sciences</json:string><json:string>agriculture, fisheries & forestry</json:string><json:string>fisheries</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>2000</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2000</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1046/j.1467-2979.2000.00028.x</json:string></doi><id>8B0E2C7B9E237461354A1389EAEAA0FDA9D54CDC</id><score>0.036309995</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8B0E2C7B9E237461354A1389EAEAA0FDA9D54CDC/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8B0E2C7B9E237461354A1389EAEAA0FDA9D54CDC/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/8B0E2C7B9E237461354A1389EAEAA0FDA9D54CDC/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Methods for studying spatial behaviour of freshwater fishes in the natural environment</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>Blackwell Science Ltd</p></availability><date>2000</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Methods for studying spatial behaviour of freshwater fishes in the natural environment</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">M.C.</forename><surname>Lucas</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Biological Sciences, University of Durham, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">E.</forename><surname>Baras</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Ethology and Animal Psychology, University of Liège, 10 Chemin de la Justice, B‐4500 Tihange, Belgium</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Fish and Fisheries</title><idno type="pISSN">1467-2960</idno><idno type="eISSN">1467-2979</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-2979</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2000-12-21"></date><biblScope unit="volume">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="283">283</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="316">316</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">8B0E2C7B9E237461354A1389EAEAA0FDA9D54CDC</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1046/j.1467-2979.2000.00028.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">FAF028</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2000</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Spatial behaviour of fishes in fresh and brackish water ranges in temporal scales between localized diel movements, often associated with foraging and predator evasion, to seasonal or life‐cycle related events involving movements between freshwater habitats or freshwater and marine biotopes. Recent technological advances have resulted in dramatic improvements in the range of techniques available for the study of spatial behaviour of freshwater fishes in the natural environment, and broadly may be divided into two categories: capture dependent and capture independent. The former incorporates those methods that rely on sampling marked fish (mark–recapture) or unmarked fish (density estimates, catch per unit effort) over defined scales of time and space in order to derive information on distribution and movement. Captured fish may also be tagged with transmitters that radiate energy, enabling the fish to be tracked and/or environmental data to be gathered. Biochemical analysis of samples from fish, requiring non‐destructive sampling (genetic analysis and scale microchemistry) or destructive sampling (otolith microchemistry) may also provide information on migration and ontogenetic processes. Capture independent techniques include visual observation and video techniques, hydroacoustics and automated fish counting. Catch per unit effort and mark–recapture techniques are most efficient where long‐term fishery or monitoring studies are in place and data on crude spatial and temporal scales are acceptable. They also have the advantages of low technical requirements and low equipment costs. Where specific management or ecological questions are pertinent, recapture independent techniques may be more appropriate. Telemetric methods can provide high resolution information at the individual level, while hydroacoustics is increasingly providing information at the population level in large lake and river environments. Biochemical methods are becoming increasingly useful in determining the extent of population segregation, where DNA analysis is used, and in the study of migration and ontogenetic changes in behaviour, where otolith microchemistry and stable isotope analysis is used.</p></abstract><textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>keywords</head><item><term>freshwater fish behaviour</term></item><item><term>hydroacoustics</term></item><item><term>migration</term></item><item><term>otolith microchemistry</term></item><item><term>tagging</term></item><item><term>telemetry</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2000-12-21">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8B0E2C7B9E237461354A1389EAEAA0FDA9D54CDC/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-2979</doi><issn type="print">1467-2960</issn><issn type="electronic">1467-2979</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="FAF"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="FISH FISHERIES">Fish and Fisheries</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="12004"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/faf.2000.1.issue-4</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="1">1</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="4">4</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2000-12-21">December 2000</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="miscellaneous" position="0028300" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1046/j.1467-2979.2000.00028.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="FAF028"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="34"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Reviews</title></titleGroup><copyright>Blackwell Science Ltd</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2008-07-07"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2008-07-07"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-03-06"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-25"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="283">283</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="316">316</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Martyn C. Lucas Department of Biological Sciences, University of Durham, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UKE‐mail: m.c.lucas@ durham.ac.ukTel.: +44 191 3743345Fax: +44 191 3742417</correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:FAF.FAF28.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="1"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="1"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="220"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Methods for studying spatial behaviour of freshwater fishes in the natural environment</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>M.C.</givenNames><familyName>Lucas</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>E.</givenNames><familyName>Baras</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="GB"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Biological Sciences, University of Durham, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Ethology and Animal Psychology, University of Liège, 10 Chemin de la Justice, B‐4500 Tihange, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">freshwater fish behaviour</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">hydroacoustics</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">migration</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">otolith microchemistry</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">tagging</keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">telemetry</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p>Spatial behaviour of fishes in fresh and brackish water ranges in temporal scales between localized diel movements, often associated with foraging and predator evasion, to seasonal or life‐cycle related events involving movements between freshwater habitats or freshwater and marine biotopes. Recent technological advances have resulted in dramatic improvements in the range of techniques available for the study of spatial behaviour of freshwater fishes in the natural environment, and broadly may be divided into two categories: capture dependent and capture independent. The former incorporates those methods that rely on sampling marked fish (mark–recapture) or unmarked fish (density estimates, catch per unit effort) over defined scales of time and space in order to derive information on distribution and movement. Captured fish may also be tagged with transmitters that radiate energy, enabling the fish to be tracked and/or environmental data to be gathered. Biochemical analysis of samples from fish, requiring non‐destructive sampling (genetic analysis and scale microchemistry) or destructive sampling (otolith microchemistry) may also provide information on migration and ontogenetic processes. Capture independent techniques include visual observation and video techniques, hydroacoustics and automated fish counting. Catch per unit effort and mark–recapture techniques are most efficient where long‐term fishery or monitoring studies are in place and data on crude spatial and temporal scales are acceptable. They also have the advantages of low technical requirements and low equipment costs. Where specific management or ecological questions are pertinent, recapture independent techniques may be more appropriate. Telemetric methods can provide high resolution information at the individual level, while hydroacoustics is increasingly providing information at the population level in large lake and river environments. Biochemical methods are becoming increasingly useful in determining the extent of population segregation, where DNA analysis is used, and in the study of migration and ontogenetic changes in behaviour, where otolith microchemistry and stable isotope analysis is used.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Methods for studying spatial behaviour of freshwater fishes in the natural environment</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Methods for studying spatial behaviour of freshwater fishes in the natural environment</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">M.C.</namePart><namePart type="family">Lucas</namePart><affiliation>Department of Biological Sciences, University of Durham, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">E.</namePart><namePart type="family">Baras</namePart><affiliation>Department of Ethology and Animal Psychology, University of Liège, 10 Chemin de la Justice, B‐4500 Tihange, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="other" displayLabel="miscellaneous"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000-12-21</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2000</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="figures">1</extent><extent unit="tables">1</extent><extent unit="references">220</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Spatial behaviour of fishes in fresh and brackish water ranges in temporal scales between localized diel movements, often associated with foraging and predator evasion, to seasonal or life‐cycle related events involving movements between freshwater habitats or freshwater and marine biotopes. Recent technological advances have resulted in dramatic improvements in the range of techniques available for the study of spatial behaviour of freshwater fishes in the natural environment, and broadly may be divided into two categories: capture dependent and capture independent. The former incorporates those methods that rely on sampling marked fish (mark–recapture) or unmarked fish (density estimates, catch per unit effort) over defined scales of time and space in order to derive information on distribution and movement. Captured fish may also be tagged with transmitters that radiate energy, enabling the fish to be tracked and/or environmental data to be gathered. Biochemical analysis of samples from fish, requiring non‐destructive sampling (genetic analysis and scale microchemistry) or destructive sampling (otolith microchemistry) may also provide information on migration and ontogenetic processes. Capture independent techniques include visual observation and video techniques, hydroacoustics and automated fish counting. Catch per unit effort and mark–recapture techniques are most efficient where long‐term fishery or monitoring studies are in place and data on crude spatial and temporal scales are acceptable. They also have the advantages of low technical requirements and low equipment costs. Where specific management or ecological questions are pertinent, recapture independent techniques may be more appropriate. Telemetric methods can provide high resolution information at the individual level, while hydroacoustics is increasingly providing information at the population level in large lake and river environments. Biochemical methods are becoming increasingly useful in determining the extent of population segregation, where DNA analysis is used, and in the study of migration and ontogenetic changes in behaviour, where otolith microchemistry and stable isotope analysis is used.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>freshwater fish behaviour</topic><topic>hydroacoustics</topic><topic>migration</topic><topic>otolith microchemistry</topic><topic>tagging</topic><topic>telemetry</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Fish and Fisheries</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1467-2960</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1467-2979</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-2979</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">FAF</identifier><part><date>2000</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>1</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>4</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>283</start><end>316</end><total>34</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">8B0E2C7B9E237461354A1389EAEAA0FDA9D54CDC</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1046/j.1467-2979.2000.00028.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">FAF028</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Blackwell Science Ltd</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Science Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Eau/explor/EsturgeonV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001483 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001483 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Eau
|area= EsturgeonV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:8B0E2C7B9E237461354A1389EAEAA0FDA9D54CDC
|texte= Methods for studying spatial behaviour of freshwater fishes in the natural environment
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.27. |  |