Evaluation of lethal and non‐lethal sampling methods for the detection of white sturgeon iridovirus infection in white sturgeon, Acipenser transmontanus (Richardson)
Identifieur interne : 001159 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001158; suivant : 001160Evaluation of lethal and non‐lethal sampling methods for the detection of white sturgeon iridovirus infection in white sturgeon, Acipenser transmontanus (Richardson)
Auteurs : J D Drennan ; S E Lapatra ; C A Samson ; S. Ireland ; K F Eversman ; K D CainSource :
- Journal of Fish Diseases [ 0140-7775 ] ; 2007-06.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Pectoral fin tissue of white sturgeon was investigated as a potential non‐lethal sample source for the detection of white sturgeon iridovirus (WSIV) infection. Histopathology and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results using fin tissue were compared with the standard lethal histopathology sampling method that utilizes head tissue. Tissues for each of the three sampling methods were collected weekly for 8 weeks from individual sturgeon undergoing an experimental cohabitation challenge with fish infected with the Abernathy isolate of WSIV. Non‐lethal fin histopathological evaluation did not reveal infection during the first 3 weeks of sampling, while non‐lethal PCR and the lethal method were variable. However, all three sampling methods were equally capable of identifying infection from 4 to 8 weeks post‐exposure. Of the survivors tested, all were negative by PCR and the lethal method, and only one fish was identified as being positive by non‐lethal fin histopathology. In another experiment, all three sampling methods were applied to asymptomatic WSIV carriers in a case study conducted at the Kootenai Tribal Sturgeon Conservation Hatchery. Results showed that both lethal and non‐lethal fin histopathology were equally effective in detecting infection, but PCR was unable to identify this strain of WSIV. Depending on the virus isolate, these results suggest that non‐lethal sampling of fin tissue (histopathology or PCR) is comparable with the lethal sampling method at identifying WSIV infection once infection is established, and under certain circumstances may provide an alternative to lethal sampling.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2761.2007.00817.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:5E38A9CB1193C87FF64877EA039C10FF9385CFA8Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Evaluation of lethal and non‐lethal sampling methods for the detection of white sturgeon iridovirus infection in white sturgeon, Acipenser transmontanus (Richardson)</title><author><name sortKey="Drennan, J D" sort="Drennan, J D" uniqKey="Drennan J" first="J D" last="Drennan">J D Drennan</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources and the Aquaculture Research Institute, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lapatra, S E" sort="Lapatra, S E" uniqKey="Lapatra S" first="S E" last="Lapatra">S E Lapatra</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Clear Springs Foods, Inc., Buhl, ID, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Samson, C A" sort="Samson, C A" uniqKey="Samson C" first="C A" last="Samson">C A Samson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Idaho Fish Health Center‐USFW, Orofino, ID, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ireland, S" sort="Ireland, S" uniqKey="Ireland S" first="S" last="Ireland">S. Ireland</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Kootenai Tribe of Idaho, Bonners Ferry, ID, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Eversman, K F" sort="Eversman, K F" uniqKey="Eversman K" first="K F" last="Eversman">K F Eversman</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources and the Aquaculture Research Institute, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Cain, K D" sort="Cain, K D" uniqKey="Cain K" first="K D" last="Cain">K D Cain</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources and the Aquaculture Research Institute, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:5E38A9CB1193C87FF64877EA039C10FF9385CFA8</idno><date when="2007" year="2007">2007</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2761.2007.00817.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/5E38A9CB1193C87FF64877EA039C10FF9385CFA8/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001159</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001159</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Evaluation of lethal and non‐lethal sampling methods for the detection of white sturgeon iridovirus infection in white sturgeon, Acipenser transmontanus (Richardson)</title><author><name sortKey="Drennan, J D" sort="Drennan, J D" uniqKey="Drennan J" first="J D" last="Drennan">J D Drennan</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources and the Aquaculture Research Institute, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lapatra, S E" sort="Lapatra, S E" uniqKey="Lapatra S" first="S E" last="Lapatra">S E Lapatra</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Clear Springs Foods, Inc., Buhl, ID, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Samson, C A" sort="Samson, C A" uniqKey="Samson C" first="C A" last="Samson">C A Samson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Idaho Fish Health Center‐USFW, Orofino, ID, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ireland, S" sort="Ireland, S" uniqKey="Ireland S" first="S" last="Ireland">S. Ireland</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Kootenai Tribe of Idaho, Bonners Ferry, ID, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Eversman, K F" sort="Eversman, K F" uniqKey="Eversman K" first="K F" last="Eversman">K F Eversman</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources and the Aquaculture Research Institute, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Cain, K D" sort="Cain, K D" uniqKey="Cain K" first="K D" last="Cain">K D Cain</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources and the Aquaculture Research Institute, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Journal of Fish Diseases</title><idno type="ISSN">0140-7775</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2761</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2007-06">2007-06</date><biblScope unit="volume">30</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="367">367</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="379">379</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0140-7775</idno></series><idno type="istex">5E38A9CB1193C87FF64877EA039C10FF9385CFA8</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2761.2007.00817.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">JFD817</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0140-7775</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>detection</term><term>fin tissue</term><term>lethal sampling</term><term>non‐lethal sampling</term><term>sturgeon</term><term>white sturgeon iridovirus</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Pectoral fin tissue of white sturgeon was investigated as a potential non‐lethal sample source for the detection of white sturgeon iridovirus (WSIV) infection. Histopathology and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results using fin tissue were compared with the standard lethal histopathology sampling method that utilizes head tissue. Tissues for each of the three sampling methods were collected weekly for 8 weeks from individual sturgeon undergoing an experimental cohabitation challenge with fish infected with the Abernathy isolate of WSIV. Non‐lethal fin histopathological evaluation did not reveal infection during the first 3 weeks of sampling, while non‐lethal PCR and the lethal method were variable. However, all three sampling methods were equally capable of identifying infection from 4 to 8 weeks post‐exposure. Of the survivors tested, all were negative by PCR and the lethal method, and only one fish was identified as being positive by non‐lethal fin histopathology. In another experiment, all three sampling methods were applied to asymptomatic WSIV carriers in a case study conducted at the Kootenai Tribal Sturgeon Conservation Hatchery. Results showed that both lethal and non‐lethal fin histopathology were equally effective in detecting infection, but PCR was unable to identify this strain of WSIV. Depending on the virus isolate, these results suggest that non‐lethal sampling of fin tissue (histopathology or PCR) is comparable with the lethal sampling method at identifying WSIV infection once infection is established, and under certain circumstances may provide an alternative to lethal sampling.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>J D Drennan</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources and the Aquaculture Research Institute, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>S E LaPatra</name><affiliations><json:string>Clear Springs Foods, Inc., Buhl, ID, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>C A Samson</name><affiliations><json:string>Idaho Fish Health Center‐USFW, Orofino, ID, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>S Ireland</name><affiliations><json:string>Kootenai Tribe of Idaho, Bonners Ferry, ID, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>K F Eversman</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources and the Aquaculture Research Institute, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>K D Cain</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources and the Aquaculture Research Institute, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>detection</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>fin tissue</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>lethal sampling</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>non‐lethal sampling</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>sturgeon</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>white sturgeon iridovirus</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>JFD817</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Pectoral fin tissue of white sturgeon was investigated as a potential non‐lethal sample source for the detection of white sturgeon iridovirus (WSIV) infection. Histopathology and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results using fin tissue were compared with the standard lethal histopathology sampling method that utilizes head tissue. Tissues for each of the three sampling methods were collected weekly for 8 weeks from individual sturgeon undergoing an experimental cohabitation challenge with fish infected with the Abernathy isolate of WSIV. Non‐lethal fin histopathological evaluation did not reveal infection during the first 3 weeks of sampling, while non‐lethal PCR and the lethal method were variable. However, all three sampling methods were equally capable of identifying infection from 4 to 8 weeks post‐exposure. Of the survivors tested, all were negative by PCR and the lethal method, and only one fish was identified as being positive by non‐lethal fin histopathology. In another experiment, all three sampling methods were applied to asymptomatic WSIV carriers in a case study conducted at the Kootenai Tribal Sturgeon Conservation Hatchery. Results showed that both lethal and non‐lethal fin histopathology were equally effective in detecting infection, but PCR was unable to identify this strain of WSIV. Depending on the virus isolate, these results suggest that non‐lethal sampling of fin tissue (histopathology or PCR) is comparable with the lethal sampling method at identifying WSIV infection once infection is established, and under certain circumstances may provide an alternative to lethal sampling.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.808</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>1623</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>7362</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>47344</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>13</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>234</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Evaluation of lethal and non‐lethal sampling methods for the detection of white sturgeon iridovirus infection in white sturgeon, Acipenser transmontanus (Richardson)</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>30</volume><publisherId><json:string>JFD</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>13</total><last>379</last><first>367</first></pages><issn><json:string>0140-7775</json:string></issn><issue>6</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1365-2761</json:string></eissn><title>Journal of Fish Diseases</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2761</json:string></doi></host><categories><wos><json:string>science</json:string><json:string>veterinary sciences</json:string><json:string>marine & freshwater biology</json:string><json:string>fisheries</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>applied sciences</json:string><json:string>agriculture, fisheries & forestry</json:string><json:string>fisheries</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>2007</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2007</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1365-2761.2007.00817.x</json:string></doi><id>5E38A9CB1193C87FF64877EA039C10FF9385CFA8</id><score>0.051526662</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/5E38A9CB1193C87FF64877EA039C10FF9385CFA8/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/5E38A9CB1193C87FF64877EA039C10FF9385CFA8/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/5E38A9CB1193C87FF64877EA039C10FF9385CFA8/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Evaluation of lethal and non‐lethal sampling methods for the detection of white sturgeon iridovirus infection in white sturgeon, Acipenser transmontanus (Richardson)</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>WILEY</p></availability><date>2007</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Evaluation of lethal and non‐lethal sampling methods for the detection of white sturgeon iridovirus infection in white sturgeon, Acipenser transmontanus (Richardson)</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">J D</forename><surname>Drennan</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources and the Aquaculture Research Institute, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">S E</forename><surname>LaPatra</surname></persName><affiliation>Clear Springs Foods, Inc., Buhl, ID, USA</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-3"><persName><forename type="first">C A</forename><surname>Samson</surname></persName><affiliation>Idaho Fish Health Center‐USFW, Orofino, ID, USA</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-4"><persName><forename type="first">S</forename><surname>Ireland</surname></persName><affiliation>Kootenai Tribe of Idaho, Bonners Ferry, ID, USA</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-5"><persName><forename type="first">K F</forename><surname>Eversman</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources and the Aquaculture Research Institute, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-6"><persName><forename type="first">K D</forename><surname>Cain</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources and the Aquaculture Research Institute, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Journal of Fish Diseases</title><idno type="pISSN">0140-7775</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2761</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2761</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2007-06"></date><biblScope unit="volume">30</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="367">367</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="379">379</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">5E38A9CB1193C87FF64877EA039C10FF9385CFA8</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2761.2007.00817.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">JFD817</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2007</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Pectoral fin tissue of white sturgeon was investigated as a potential non‐lethal sample source for the detection of white sturgeon iridovirus (WSIV) infection. Histopathology and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results using fin tissue were compared with the standard lethal histopathology sampling method that utilizes head tissue. Tissues for each of the three sampling methods were collected weekly for 8 weeks from individual sturgeon undergoing an experimental cohabitation challenge with fish infected with the Abernathy isolate of WSIV. Non‐lethal fin histopathological evaluation did not reveal infection during the first 3 weeks of sampling, while non‐lethal PCR and the lethal method were variable. However, all three sampling methods were equally capable of identifying infection from 4 to 8 weeks post‐exposure. Of the survivors tested, all were negative by PCR and the lethal method, and only one fish was identified as being positive by non‐lethal fin histopathology. In another experiment, all three sampling methods were applied to asymptomatic WSIV carriers in a case study conducted at the Kootenai Tribal Sturgeon Conservation Hatchery. Results showed that both lethal and non‐lethal fin histopathology were equally effective in detecting infection, but PCR was unable to identify this strain of WSIV. Depending on the virus isolate, these results suggest that non‐lethal sampling of fin tissue (histopathology or PCR) is comparable with the lethal sampling method at identifying WSIV infection once infection is established, and under certain circumstances may provide an alternative to lethal sampling.</p></abstract><textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>keywords</head><item><term>detection</term></item><item><term>fin tissue</term></item><item><term>lethal sampling</term></item><item><term>non‐lethal sampling</term></item><item><term>sturgeon</term></item><item><term>white sturgeon iridovirus</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2007-06">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/5E38A9CB1193C87FF64877EA039C10FF9385CFA8/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2761</doi><issn type="print">0140-7775</issn><issn type="electronic">1365-2761</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JFD"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL OF FISH DISEASES">Journal of Fish Diseases</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="06006"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/jfd.2007.30.issue-6</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="30">30</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="6">6</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2007-06">June 2007</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="5" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1365-2761.2007.00817.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JFD817"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="13"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2007-05-09"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2007-05-09"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-03-11"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-30"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-30"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="367">367</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="379">379</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>K D Cain, University of Idaho, Department of Fish & Wildlife Resources, Moscow, ID 83844‐1136, USA
(e‐mail: <email>kcain@uidaho.edu</email>)</correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JFD.JFD817.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Received: 2 August 2006 Revision received: 11 December 2006 Accepted: 13 December 2006</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="4"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="4"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Evaluation of lethal and non‐lethal sampling methods for the detection of white sturgeon iridovirus infection in white sturgeon, <i>Acipenser transmontanus</i> (Richardson)</title><title type="shortAuthors"><b>J D Drennan et al.</b></title><title type="short"><i>Lethal and non‐lethal sampling for WSIV</i></title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>J D</givenNames><familyName>Drennan</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>S E</givenNames><familyName>LaPatra</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>C A</givenNames><familyName>Samson</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a4"><personName><givenNames>S</givenNames><familyName>Ireland</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>K F</givenNames><familyName>Eversman</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr6" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>K D</givenNames><familyName>Cain</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="US"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources and the Aquaculture Research Institute, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="US"><unparsedAffiliation>Clear Springs Foods, Inc., Buhl, ID, USA</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="US"><unparsedAffiliation>Idaho Fish Health Center‐USFW, Orofino, ID, USA</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a4" countryCode="US"><unparsedAffiliation>Kootenai Tribe of Idaho, Bonners Ferry, ID, USA</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">detection</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">fin tissue</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">lethal sampling</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">non‐lethal sampling</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">sturgeon</keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">white sturgeon iridovirus</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p>Pectoral fin tissue of white sturgeon was investigated as a potential non‐lethal sample source for the detection of white sturgeon iridovirus (WSIV) infection. Histopathology and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results using fin tissue were compared with the standard lethal histopathology sampling method that utilizes head tissue. Tissues for each of the three sampling methods were collected weekly for 8 weeks from individual sturgeon undergoing an experimental cohabitation challenge with fish infected with the Abernathy isolate of WSIV. Non‐lethal fin histopathological evaluation did not reveal infection during the first 3 weeks of sampling, while non‐lethal PCR and the lethal method were variable. However, all three sampling methods were equally capable of identifying infection from 4 to 8 weeks post‐exposure. Of the survivors tested, all were negative by PCR and the lethal method, and only one fish was identified as being positive by non‐lethal fin histopathology. In another experiment, all three sampling methods were applied to asymptomatic WSIV carriers in a case study conducted at the Kootenai Tribal Sturgeon Conservation Hatchery. Results showed that both lethal and non‐lethal fin histopathology were equally effective in detecting infection, but PCR was unable to identify this strain of WSIV. Depending on the virus isolate, these results suggest that non‐lethal sampling of fin tissue (histopathology or PCR) is comparable with the lethal sampling method at identifying WSIV infection once infection is established, and under certain circumstances may provide an alternative to lethal sampling.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Evaluation of lethal and non‐lethal sampling methods for the detection of white sturgeon iridovirus infection in white sturgeon, Acipenser transmontanus (Richardson)</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Lethal and non‐lethal sampling for WSIV</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Evaluation of lethal and non‐lethal sampling methods for the detection of white sturgeon iridovirus infection in white sturgeon, Acipenser transmontanus (Richardson)</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">J D</namePart><namePart type="family">Drennan</namePart><affiliation>Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources and the Aquaculture Research Institute, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">S E</namePart><namePart type="family">LaPatra</namePart><affiliation>Clear Springs Foods, Inc., Buhl, ID, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">C A</namePart><namePart type="family">Samson</namePart><affiliation>Idaho Fish Health Center‐USFW, Orofino, ID, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">S</namePart><namePart type="family">Ireland</namePart><affiliation>Kootenai Tribe of Idaho, Bonners Ferry, ID, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">K F</namePart><namePart type="family">Eversman</namePart><affiliation>Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources and the Aquaculture Research Institute, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">K D</namePart><namePart type="family">Cain</namePart><affiliation>Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources and the Aquaculture Research Institute, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2007-06</dateIssued><edition>Received: 2 August 2006 Revision received: 11 December 2006 Accepted: 13 December 2006</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2007</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="figures">4</extent><extent unit="tables">4</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Pectoral fin tissue of white sturgeon was investigated as a potential non‐lethal sample source for the detection of white sturgeon iridovirus (WSIV) infection. Histopathology and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results using fin tissue were compared with the standard lethal histopathology sampling method that utilizes head tissue. Tissues for each of the three sampling methods were collected weekly for 8 weeks from individual sturgeon undergoing an experimental cohabitation challenge with fish infected with the Abernathy isolate of WSIV. Non‐lethal fin histopathological evaluation did not reveal infection during the first 3 weeks of sampling, while non‐lethal PCR and the lethal method were variable. However, all three sampling methods were equally capable of identifying infection from 4 to 8 weeks post‐exposure. Of the survivors tested, all were negative by PCR and the lethal method, and only one fish was identified as being positive by non‐lethal fin histopathology. In another experiment, all three sampling methods were applied to asymptomatic WSIV carriers in a case study conducted at the Kootenai Tribal Sturgeon Conservation Hatchery. Results showed that both lethal and non‐lethal fin histopathology were equally effective in detecting infection, but PCR was unable to identify this strain of WSIV. Depending on the virus isolate, these results suggest that non‐lethal sampling of fin tissue (histopathology or PCR) is comparable with the lethal sampling method at identifying WSIV infection once infection is established, and under certain circumstances may provide an alternative to lethal sampling.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>detection</topic><topic>fin tissue</topic><topic>lethal sampling</topic><topic>non‐lethal sampling</topic><topic>sturgeon</topic><topic>white sturgeon iridovirus</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Fish Diseases</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0140-7775</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1365-2761</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2761</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JFD</identifier><part><date>2007</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>30</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>6</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>367</start><end>379</end><total>13</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">5E38A9CB1193C87FF64877EA039C10FF9385CFA8</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2761.2007.00817.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JFD817</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Eau/explor/EsturgeonV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001159 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001159 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Eau
|area= EsturgeonV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:5E38A9CB1193C87FF64877EA039C10FF9385CFA8
|texte= Evaluation of lethal and non‐lethal sampling methods for the detection of white sturgeon iridovirus infection in white sturgeon, Acipenser transmontanus (Richardson)
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.27. |  |