Morphological differentiation of introduced pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L., 1758) populations in Tunisian freshwaters
Identifieur interne : 000E54 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000E53; suivant : 000E55Morphological differentiation of introduced pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L., 1758) populations in Tunisian freshwaters
Auteurs : O. Turki-Missaoui ; M. M Etli ; M. M. Kraïem ; A. ChrikiSource :
- Journal of Applied Ichthyology [ 0175-8659 ] ; 2011-10.
Abstract
In order to evaluate the phenotypic plasticity of introduced pikeperch populations in Tunisia, the intra‐ and interpopulation differentiation was analysed using a biometric approach. Thus, nine meristic counts and 23 morphological measurements were taken from 574 specimens collected from three dams and a hill lake. The univariate (anova) and multivariate analyses (PCA and DFA) showed a low meristic variability between the pikeperch samples and a segregated pikeperch group from the Sidi Salem dam which displayed a high distance between mouth and pectoral fin and a high antedorsal distance. In addition, the Korba hill lake population seemed to have more important values of total length, eye diameter, maximum body height and a higher distance between mouth and operculum than the other populations. However, the most accentuated segregation was found in the Lebna sample where the individuals were characterized by high snout length, body thickness, pectoral fin length, maximum body height and distance between mouth and operculum. This study shows the existence of morphological differentiations between populations derived from a single gene pool that have been isolated in separated sites for several decades although in relatively similar environments.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2011.01748.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:4C98F423EB916AF750F41DA08B078A9C07983F77Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Morphological differentiation of introduced pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L., 1758) populations in Tunisian freshwaters</title><author><name sortKey="Turki Issaoui, O" sort="Turki Issaoui, O" uniqKey="Turki Issaoui O" first="O." last="Turki-Missaoui">O. Turki-Missaoui</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Laboratory of Aquaculture, Institut National des Sciences et Technologies de la Mer (INSTM), Salammbô, Tunisia</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="M Etli, M" sort="M Etli, M" uniqKey="M Etli M" first="M." last="M Etli">M. M Etli</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Laboratory of Aquaculture, Institut National des Sciences et Technologies de la Mer (INSTM), Salammbô, Tunisia</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kraiem, M M" sort="Kraiem, M M" uniqKey="Kraiem M" first="M. M." last="Kraïem">M. M. Kraïem</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Laboratory of Aquaculture, Institut National des Sciences et Technologies de la Mer (INSTM), Salammbô, Tunisia</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Chriki, A" sort="Chriki, A" uniqKey="Chriki A" first="A." last="Chriki">A. Chriki</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Laboratory of Genetics, Faculté des Sciences, Bizerte, Tunisia</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:4C98F423EB916AF750F41DA08B078A9C07983F77</idno><date when="2011" year="2011">2011</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1439-0426.2011.01748.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/4C98F423EB916AF750F41DA08B078A9C07983F77/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000E54</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000E54</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Morphological differentiation of introduced pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L., 1758) populations in Tunisian freshwaters</title><author><name sortKey="Turki Issaoui, O" sort="Turki Issaoui, O" uniqKey="Turki Issaoui O" first="O." last="Turki-Missaoui">O. Turki-Missaoui</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Laboratory of Aquaculture, Institut National des Sciences et Technologies de la Mer (INSTM), Salammbô, Tunisia</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="M Etli, M" sort="M Etli, M" uniqKey="M Etli M" first="M." last="M Etli">M. M Etli</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Laboratory of Aquaculture, Institut National des Sciences et Technologies de la Mer (INSTM), Salammbô, Tunisia</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kraiem, M M" sort="Kraiem, M M" uniqKey="Kraiem M" first="M. M." last="Kraïem">M. M. Kraïem</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Laboratory of Aquaculture, Institut National des Sciences et Technologies de la Mer (INSTM), Salammbô, Tunisia</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Chriki, A" sort="Chriki, A" uniqKey="Chriki A" first="A." last="Chriki">A. Chriki</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Laboratory of Genetics, Faculté des Sciences, Bizerte, Tunisia</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Journal of Applied Ichthyology</title><idno type="ISSN">0175-8659</idno><idno type="eISSN">1439-0426</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2011-10">2011-10</date><biblScope unit="volume">27</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1181">1181</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1189">1189</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0175-8659</idno></series><idno type="istex">4C98F423EB916AF750F41DA08B078A9C07983F77</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1439-0426.2011.01748.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">JAI1748</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0175-8659</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">In order to evaluate the phenotypic plasticity of introduced pikeperch populations in Tunisia, the intra‐ and interpopulation differentiation was analysed using a biometric approach. Thus, nine meristic counts and 23 morphological measurements were taken from 574 specimens collected from three dams and a hill lake. The univariate (anova) and multivariate analyses (PCA and DFA) showed a low meristic variability between the pikeperch samples and a segregated pikeperch group from the Sidi Salem dam which displayed a high distance between mouth and pectoral fin and a high antedorsal distance. In addition, the Korba hill lake population seemed to have more important values of total length, eye diameter, maximum body height and a higher distance between mouth and operculum than the other populations. However, the most accentuated segregation was found in the Lebna sample where the individuals were characterized by high snout length, body thickness, pectoral fin length, maximum body height and distance between mouth and operculum. This study shows the existence of morphological differentiations between populations derived from a single gene pool that have been isolated in separated sites for several decades although in relatively similar environments.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>O. Turki‐Missaoui</name><affiliations><json:string>Laboratory of Aquaculture, Institut National des Sciences et Technologies de la Mer (INSTM), Salammbô, Tunisia</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>M. M’Hetli</name><affiliations><json:string>Laboratory of Aquaculture, Institut National des Sciences et Technologies de la Mer (INSTM), Salammbô, Tunisia</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>M. M. Kraïem</name><affiliations><json:string>Laboratory of Aquaculture, Institut National des Sciences et Technologies de la Mer (INSTM), Salammbô, Tunisia</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>A. Chriki</name><affiliations><json:string>Laboratory of Genetics, Faculté des Sciences, Bizerte, Tunisia</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>JAI1748</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>In order to evaluate the phenotypic plasticity of introduced pikeperch populations in Tunisia, the intra‐ and interpopulation differentiation was analysed using a biometric approach. Thus, nine meristic counts and 23 morphological measurements were taken from 574 specimens collected from three dams and a hill lake. The univariate (anova) and multivariate analyses (PCA and DFA) showed a low meristic variability between the pikeperch samples and a segregated pikeperch group from the Sidi Salem dam which displayed a high distance between mouth and pectoral fin and a high antedorsal distance. In addition, the Korba hill lake population seemed to have more important values of total length, eye diameter, maximum body height and a higher distance between mouth and operculum than the other populations. However, the most accentuated segregation was found in the Lebna sample where the individuals were characterized by high snout length, body thickness, pectoral fin length, maximum body height and distance between mouth and operculum. This study shows the existence of morphological differentiations between populations derived from a single gene pool that have been isolated in separated sites for several decades although in relatively similar environments.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.232</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 841.89 pts (A4)</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>1264</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>5397</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>40041</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>9</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>186</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Morphological differentiation of introduced pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L., 1758) populations in Tunisian freshwaters</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>27</volume><publisherId><json:string>JAI</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>9</total><last>1189</last><first>1181</first></pages><issn><json:string>0175-8659</json:string></issn><issue>5</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1439-0426</json:string></eissn><title>Journal of Applied Ichthyology</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1439-0426</json:string></doi></host><categories><wos><json:string>science</json:string><json:string>marine & freshwater biology</json:string><json:string>fisheries</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>applied sciences</json:string><json:string>agriculture, fisheries & forestry</json:string><json:string>fisheries</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>2011</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2011</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1439-0426.2011.01748.x</json:string></doi><id>4C98F423EB916AF750F41DA08B078A9C07983F77</id><score>0.02034574</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/4C98F423EB916AF750F41DA08B078A9C07983F77/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/4C98F423EB916AF750F41DA08B078A9C07983F77/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/4C98F423EB916AF750F41DA08B078A9C07983F77/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Morphological differentiation of introduced pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L., 1758) populations in Tunisian freshwaters</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>© 2011 Blackwell Verlag, Berlin</p></availability><date>2011</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Morphological differentiation of introduced pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L., 1758) populations in Tunisian freshwaters</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">O.</forename><surname>Turki‐Missaoui</surname></persName><affiliation>Laboratory of Aquaculture, Institut National des Sciences et Technologies de la Mer (INSTM), Salammbô, Tunisia</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">M.</forename><surname>M’Hetli</surname></persName><affiliation>Laboratory of Aquaculture, Institut National des Sciences et Technologies de la Mer (INSTM), Salammbô, Tunisia</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-3"><persName><forename type="first">M. M.</forename><surname>Kraïem</surname></persName><affiliation>Laboratory of Aquaculture, Institut National des Sciences et Technologies de la Mer (INSTM), Salammbô, Tunisia</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-4"><persName><forename type="first">A.</forename><surname>Chriki</surname></persName><affiliation>Laboratory of Genetics, Faculté des Sciences, Bizerte, Tunisia</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Journal of Applied Ichthyology</title><idno type="pISSN">0175-8659</idno><idno type="eISSN">1439-0426</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1439-0426</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2011-10"></date><biblScope unit="volume">27</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1181">1181</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1189">1189</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">4C98F423EB916AF750F41DA08B078A9C07983F77</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1439-0426.2011.01748.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">JAI1748</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2011</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>In order to evaluate the phenotypic plasticity of introduced pikeperch populations in Tunisia, the intra‐ and interpopulation differentiation was analysed using a biometric approach. Thus, nine meristic counts and 23 morphological measurements were taken from 574 specimens collected from three dams and a hill lake. The univariate (anova) and multivariate analyses (PCA and DFA) showed a low meristic variability between the pikeperch samples and a segregated pikeperch group from the Sidi Salem dam which displayed a high distance between mouth and pectoral fin and a high antedorsal distance. In addition, the Korba hill lake population seemed to have more important values of total length, eye diameter, maximum body height and a higher distance between mouth and operculum than the other populations. However, the most accentuated segregation was found in the Lebna sample where the individuals were characterized by high snout length, body thickness, pectoral fin length, maximum body height and distance between mouth and operculum. This study shows the existence of morphological differentiations between populations derived from a single gene pool that have been isolated in separated sites for several decades although in relatively similar environments.</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2011-10">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/4C98F423EB916AF750F41DA08B078A9C07983F77/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1439-0426</doi><issn type="print">0175-8659</issn><issn type="electronic">1439-0426</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JAI"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL OF APPLIED ICHTHYOLOGY">Journal of Applied Ichthyology</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="10105"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/jai.2011.27.issue-5</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="27">27</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="5">5</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2011-10">October 2011</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="9" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1439-0426.2011.01748.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JAI1748"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="9"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original articles</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2011 Blackwell Verlag, Berlin</copyright><eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:3.0 mode:FullText" date="2011-11-21"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2011-05-04"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2011-09-14"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2011-05-04"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-28"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-24"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="1181">1181</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="1189">1189</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><b>Author’s address:</b> O. Turki‐Missaoui, Laboratory of Aquaculture, Institut National des Sciences et Technologies de la Mer (INSTM), 28 rue du 2 Mars 1938, Salammbô 2025, Tunisia
E‐mail: <email>turki_ons@yahoo.fr</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JAI.JAI1748.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Received: May 7, 2010 Accepted: November 12, 2010</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="6"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="9"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Morphological differentiation of introduced pikeperch (<i>Sander lucioperca</i> L., 1758) populations in Tunisian freshwaters</title><title type="shortAuthors">O. Turki‐Missaoui et al.</title><title type="short">Morphological differentiation of Tunisian introduced pikeperch</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>O.</givenNames><familyName>Turki‐Missaoui</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>M.</givenNames><familyName>M’Hetli</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>M. M.</givenNames><familyName>Kraïem</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>A.</givenNames><familyName>Chriki</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="TN"><unparsedAffiliation>Laboratory of Aquaculture, Institut National des Sciences et Technologies de la Mer (INSTM), Salammbô, Tunisia</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="TN"><unparsedAffiliation>Laboratory of Genetics, Faculté des Sciences, Bizerte, Tunisia</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Summary</title><p>In order to evaluate the phenotypic plasticity of introduced pikeperch populations in Tunisia, the intra‐ and interpopulation differentiation was analysed using a biometric approach. Thus, nine meristic counts and 23 morphological measurements were taken from 574 specimens collected from three dams and a hill lake. The univariate (<sc>anova</sc>) and multivariate analyses (PCA and DFA) showed a low meristic variability between the pikeperch samples and a segregated pikeperch group from the Sidi Salem dam which displayed a high distance between mouth and pectoral fin and a high antedorsal distance. In addition, the Korba hill lake population seemed to have more important values of total length, eye diameter, maximum body height and a higher distance between mouth and operculum than the other populations. However, the most accentuated segregation was found in the Lebna sample where the individuals were characterized by high snout length, body thickness, pectoral fin length, maximum body height and distance between mouth and operculum. This study shows the existence of morphological differentiations between populations derived from a single gene pool that have been isolated in separated sites for several decades although in relatively similar environments.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Morphological differentiation of introduced pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L., 1758) populations in Tunisian freshwaters</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Morphological differentiation of Tunisian introduced pikeperch</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Morphological differentiation of introduced pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L., 1758) populations in Tunisian freshwaters</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">O.</namePart><namePart type="family">Turki‐Missaoui</namePart><affiliation>Laboratory of Aquaculture, Institut National des Sciences et Technologies de la Mer (INSTM), Salammbô, Tunisia</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">M.</namePart><namePart type="family">M’Hetli</namePart><affiliation>Laboratory of Aquaculture, Institut National des Sciences et Technologies de la Mer (INSTM), Salammbô, Tunisia</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">M. M.</namePart><namePart type="family">Kraïem</namePart><affiliation>Laboratory of Aquaculture, Institut National des Sciences et Technologies de la Mer (INSTM), Salammbô, Tunisia</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">A.</namePart><namePart type="family">Chriki</namePart><affiliation>Laboratory of Genetics, Faculté des Sciences, Bizerte, Tunisia</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2011-10</dateIssued><edition>Received: May 7, 2010 Accepted: November 12, 2010</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="figures">6</extent><extent unit="tables">9</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">In order to evaluate the phenotypic plasticity of introduced pikeperch populations in Tunisia, the intra‐ and interpopulation differentiation was analysed using a biometric approach. Thus, nine meristic counts and 23 morphological measurements were taken from 574 specimens collected from three dams and a hill lake. The univariate (anova) and multivariate analyses (PCA and DFA) showed a low meristic variability between the pikeperch samples and a segregated pikeperch group from the Sidi Salem dam which displayed a high distance between mouth and pectoral fin and a high antedorsal distance. In addition, the Korba hill lake population seemed to have more important values of total length, eye diameter, maximum body height and a higher distance between mouth and operculum than the other populations. However, the most accentuated segregation was found in the Lebna sample where the individuals were characterized by high snout length, body thickness, pectoral fin length, maximum body height and distance between mouth and operculum. This study shows the existence of morphological differentiations between populations derived from a single gene pool that have been isolated in separated sites for several decades although in relatively similar environments.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Applied Ichthyology</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0175-8659</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1439-0426</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1439-0426</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JAI</identifier><part><date>2011</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>27</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>5</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>1181</start><end>1189</end><total>9</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">4C98F423EB916AF750F41DA08B078A9C07983F77</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1439-0426.2011.01748.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JAI1748</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2011 Blackwell Verlag, Berlin</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Eau/explor/EsturgeonV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000E54 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000E54 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Eau
|area= EsturgeonV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:4C98F423EB916AF750F41DA08B078A9C07983F77
|texte= Morphological differentiation of introduced pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L., 1758) populations in Tunisian freshwaters
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.27. |  |