Interspecific hybridization of plants and resistance to herbivores: hypotheses, genetics, and variable responses in a diverse herbivore community.
Identifieur interne : 002318 ( Main/Corpus ); précédent : 002317; suivant : 002319Interspecific hybridization of plants and resistance to herbivores: hypotheses, genetics, and variable responses in a diverse herbivore community.
Auteurs : R S Fritz ; C M Nichols-Orians ; S J BrunsfeldSource :
- Oecologia [ 1432-1939 ] ; 1994.
Abstract
We studied the morphology, molecular genetics, and hebivory of two species of willows (Salix sericea and S. eriocephala) and their interspecific hybrids to test four alternative hypotheses concerning the effects of hybridization on plant resistance. Individually marked plants were identified using morphological traits in the field and measurements of stipule and leaf pubescence were made and compared using Canonical Discriminant Function Analysis. DNA was extracted from the leaves of a sample of the marked plants and RAPD-PCR analysis was performed to establish the genetic status of parental and hybrid plants. RAPD band analysis generally verified the genetic status of parental plants. Hybrid plants were usually correctly identified in the field with a few exceptions. However, the hybrid plants were a heterogeneous group of plants made up of most plants that appear to be F1s and a few plants that appear to be backcrosses to S. sericea. Morphological variables were useful for distinguishing S. sericea from S. eriocephala and hybrids, but were not as dependable in distinguishing between S. eriocephala and hybrids. We compared the densities of 11 herbivore species and the infection by a leaf rust pathogen (Melampsora sp.) on the leaves and stems of two parents and the hybrids in the field. We found support for the Additive hypothesis (3 species), the Dominance hypothesis (2 species) and the Hybrid Susceptibility hypothesis (7 species, 6 herbivores and the Melampsora rust). We found no evidence for the Hybrid Resistance hypothesis. Guild membership was not a good predictor of similar responses of species to hybrid versus parental plants. A Canonical Discriminant Function Analysis showed discrete separation of the taxa based on herbivore densities, illustrating different community structures on hybrid and parental plants. This study demonstrates the diversity of responses of phytophages in response to interspecific hybridization.
DOI: 10.1007/BF00317914
PubMed: 28313595
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:28313595Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Interspecific hybridization of plants and resistance to herbivores: hypotheses, genetics, and variable responses in a diverse herbivore community.</title><author><name sortKey="Fritz, R S" sort="Fritz, R S" uniqKey="Fritz R" first="R S" last="Fritz">R S Fritz</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Biology, Vassar College, 12601, Poughkeepsie, NY, USA.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nichols Orians, C M" sort="Nichols Orians, C M" uniqKey="Nichols Orians C" first="C M" last="Nichols-Orians">C M Nichols-Orians</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Biology, Williams College, 01267, Williamstown, MA, USA.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Brunsfeld, S J" sort="Brunsfeld, S J" uniqKey="Brunsfeld S" first="S J" last="Brunsfeld">S J Brunsfeld</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Forest Resources, University of Idaho, 83843, Moscow, ID, USA.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="1994">1994</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:28313595</idno><idno type="pmid">28313595</idno><idno type="doi">10.1007/BF00317914</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">002318</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">002318</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Interspecific hybridization of plants and resistance to herbivores: hypotheses, genetics, and variable responses in a diverse herbivore community.</title><author><name sortKey="Fritz, R S" sort="Fritz, R S" uniqKey="Fritz R" first="R S" last="Fritz">R S Fritz</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Biology, Vassar College, 12601, Poughkeepsie, NY, USA.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nichols Orians, C M" sort="Nichols Orians, C M" uniqKey="Nichols Orians C" first="C M" last="Nichols-Orians">C M Nichols-Orians</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Biology, Williams College, 01267, Williamstown, MA, USA.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Brunsfeld, S J" sort="Brunsfeld, S J" uniqKey="Brunsfeld S" first="S J" last="Brunsfeld">S J Brunsfeld</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Forest Resources, University of Idaho, 83843, Moscow, ID, USA.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Oecologia</title><idno type="eISSN">1432-1939</idno><imprint><date when="1994" type="published">1994</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">We studied the morphology, molecular genetics, and hebivory of two species of willows (Salix sericea and S. eriocephala) and their interspecific hybrids to test four alternative hypotheses concerning the effects of hybridization on plant resistance. Individually marked plants were identified using morphological traits in the field and measurements of stipule and leaf pubescence were made and compared using Canonical Discriminant Function Analysis. DNA was extracted from the leaves of a sample of the marked plants and RAPD-PCR analysis was performed to establish the genetic status of parental and hybrid plants. RAPD band analysis generally verified the genetic status of parental plants. Hybrid plants were usually correctly identified in the field with a few exceptions. However, the hybrid plants were a heterogeneous group of plants made up of most plants that appear to be F<sub>1</sub>s and a few plants that appear to be backcrosses to S. sericea. Morphological variables were useful for distinguishing S. sericea from S. eriocephala and hybrids, but were not as dependable in distinguishing between S. eriocephala and hybrids. We compared the densities of 11 herbivore species and the infection by a leaf rust pathogen (Melampsora sp.) on the leaves and stems of two parents and the hybrids in the field. We found support for the Additive hypothesis (3 species), the Dominance hypothesis (2 species) and the Hybrid Susceptibility hypothesis (7 species, 6 herbivores and the Melampsora rust). We found no evidence for the Hybrid Resistance hypothesis. Guild membership was not a good predictor of similar responses of species to hybrid versus parental plants. A Canonical Discriminant Function Analysis showed discrete separation of the taxa based on herbivore densities, illustrating different community structures on hybrid and parental plants. This study demonstrates the diversity of responses of phytophages in response to interspecific hybridization.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="PubMed-not-MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">28313595</PMID><DateRevised><Year>2019</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>20</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1432-1939</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>97</Volume><Issue>1</Issue><PubDate><Year>1994</Year><Month>Feb</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Oecologia</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Oecologia</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Interspecific hybridization of plants and resistance to herbivores: hypotheses, genetics, and variable responses in a diverse herbivore community.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>106-117</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1007/BF00317914</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>We studied the morphology, molecular genetics, and hebivory of two species of willows (Salix sericea and S. eriocephala) and their interspecific hybrids to test four alternative hypotheses concerning the effects of hybridization on plant resistance. Individually marked plants were identified using morphological traits in the field and measurements of stipule and leaf pubescence were made and compared using Canonical Discriminant Function Analysis. DNA was extracted from the leaves of a sample of the marked plants and RAPD-PCR analysis was performed to establish the genetic status of parental and hybrid plants. RAPD band analysis generally verified the genetic status of parental plants. Hybrid plants were usually correctly identified in the field with a few exceptions. However, the hybrid plants were a heterogeneous group of plants made up of most plants that appear to be F<sub>1</sub>s and a few plants that appear to be backcrosses to S. sericea. Morphological variables were useful for distinguishing S. sericea from S. eriocephala and hybrids, but were not as dependable in distinguishing between S. eriocephala and hybrids. We compared the densities of 11 herbivore species and the infection by a leaf rust pathogen (Melampsora sp.) on the leaves and stems of two parents and the hybrids in the field. We found support for the Additive hypothesis (3 species), the Dominance hypothesis (2 species) and the Hybrid Susceptibility hypothesis (7 species, 6 herbivores and the Melampsora rust). We found no evidence for the Hybrid Resistance hypothesis. Guild membership was not a good predictor of similar responses of species to hybrid versus parental plants. A Canonical Discriminant Function Analysis showed discrete separation of the taxa based on herbivore densities, illustrating different community structures on hybrid and parental plants. This study demonstrates the diversity of responses of phytophages in response to interspecific hybridization.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Fritz</LastName><ForeName>R S</ForeName><Initials>RS</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Biology, Vassar College, 12601, Poughkeepsie, NY, USA.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Nichols-Orians</LastName><ForeName>C M</ForeName><Initials>CM</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Biology, Williams College, 01267, Williamstown, MA, USA.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Brunsfeld</LastName><ForeName>S J</ForeName><Initials>SJ</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Forest Resources, University of Idaho, 83843, Moscow, ID, USA.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Germany</Country><MedlineTA>Oecologia</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0150372</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0029-8549</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Herbivores</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Host plant resistance</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Hybridization</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">RAPD</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Willow</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2017</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>18</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>1994</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>1994</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28313595</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/BF00317914</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">10.1007/BF00317914</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>Evolution. 1991 Sep;45(6):1360-1369</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28563817</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Oecologia. 1994 May;97(4):481-490</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28313737</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Trends Ecol Evol. 1988 Jul;3(7):158-67</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21227192</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Science. 1991 Nov 8;254(5033):779</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17787151</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Nov 25;18(22):6531-5</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">1979162</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Mar 15;88(6):2336-40</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">2006172</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Chem Ecol. 1989 Apr;15(4):1203-17</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24272005</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Dec 25;18(24):7213-8</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">2259619</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Oecologia. 1990 Nov;85(1):92-100</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28310960</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Evolution. 1989 Jan;43(1):223-225</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28568501</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Genetics. 1989 Nov;123(3):557-65</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">2574697</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Genetics. 1987 May;116(1):113-25</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">3596228</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Evolution. 1993 Feb;47(1):36-45</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28568092</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Theor Appl Genet. 1991 Apr;81(4):537-40</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24221321</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/WillowV1/Data/Main/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002318 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002318 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Bois
|area= WillowV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:28313595
|texte= Interspecific hybridization of plants and resistance to herbivores: hypotheses, genetics, and variable responses in a diverse herbivore community.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:28313595" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a WillowV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. |  |