Host-plant effects on larval survival of a salicin-using leaf beetle Chrysomela aeneicollis Schaeffer (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae).
Identifieur interne : 002317 ( Main/Corpus ); précédent : 002316; suivant : 002318Host-plant effects on larval survival of a salicin-using leaf beetle Chrysomela aeneicollis Schaeffer (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae).
Auteurs : Nathan Egan RankSource :
- Oecologia [ 1432-1939 ] ; 1994.
Abstract
Several species of willow leaf beetles use hostplant salicin to produce a defensive secretion that consists of salicylaldehyde. Generalist arthropod predators such as ants, ladybird beetles, and spiders are repelled by this secretion. The beetle larvae produce very little secretion when they feed on willows that lack salicylates, and salicin-using beetles prefer salicylate-rich willows over salicylate-poor ones. This preference may exist because the larvae are better defended against natural enemies on salicylate-rich willows. If this is true, the larvae should survive longer on those willows in nature. However, this prediction has not been tested. I determined the larval growth and survival of Chrysomela aeneicollis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) on five willow species (Salix boothi, S. drummondiana, S. geyeriana, S. lutea, and S. orestera). These species differed in their salicylate chemistries and in leaf toughness but not in water content. The water content varied among the individual plants. Larval growth of C. aeneicollis did not differ among the five species in the laboratory, but it varied among the individual plants and it was related to the water content. In the field, C. aeneicollis larvae developed equally rapidly on the salicylate-poor S. lutea and on the salicylate-rich S. orestera. Larval survival was greater on S. orestera than on S. lutea in one year (1986), but there was no difference between them during three succeeding years. In another survivorship experiment, larval survival was low on the medium-salicylate S. geyeriana, but high on the salicylate-poor S. boothi and on S. orestera. Larval survival in the field was related to the larval growth and water content that had been previously measured in the laboratory. These results showed that the predicted relationship between the host plant chemistry and larval survival did not usually exist for C. aeneicollis. One possible reason for this was that the most important natural enemies were specialist predators that were unaffected by the host-derived defensive secretion. One specialist predator, Symmorphus cristatus (Hymenoptera: Eumenidae), probably caused much of the mortality observed in this study. I discuss the importance of other specialist predators to salicin-using leaf beetles.
DOI: 10.1007/BF00317324
PubMed: 28313629
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:28313629Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Host-plant effects on larval survival of a salicin-using leaf beetle Chrysomela aeneicollis Schaeffer (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae).</title><author><name sortKey="Rank, Nathan Egan" sort="Rank, Nathan Egan" uniqKey="Rank N" first="Nathan Egan" last="Rank">Nathan Egan Rank</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Zoology, University of California-Davis, 95616, Davis, CA, USA.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>The White Mountain Research Station, University of California, 93514, Bishop, CA, USA.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="1994">1994</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:28313629</idno><idno type="pmid">28313629</idno><idno type="doi">10.1007/BF00317324</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">002317</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">002317</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Host-plant effects on larval survival of a salicin-using leaf beetle Chrysomela aeneicollis Schaeffer (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae).</title><author><name sortKey="Rank, Nathan Egan" sort="Rank, Nathan Egan" uniqKey="Rank N" first="Nathan Egan" last="Rank">Nathan Egan Rank</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Zoology, University of California-Davis, 95616, Davis, CA, USA.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>The White Mountain Research Station, University of California, 93514, Bishop, CA, USA.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Oecologia</title><idno type="eISSN">1432-1939</idno><imprint><date when="1994" type="published">1994</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Several species of willow leaf beetles use hostplant salicin to produce a defensive secretion that consists of salicylaldehyde. Generalist arthropod predators such as ants, ladybird beetles, and spiders are repelled by this secretion. The beetle larvae produce very little secretion when they feed on willows that lack salicylates, and salicin-using beetles prefer salicylate-rich willows over salicylate-poor ones. This preference may exist because the larvae are better defended against natural enemies on salicylate-rich willows. If this is true, the larvae should survive longer on those willows in nature. However, this prediction has not been tested. I determined the larval growth and survival of Chrysomela aeneicollis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) on five willow species (Salix boothi, S. drummondiana, S. geyeriana, S. lutea, and S. orestera). These species differed in their salicylate chemistries and in leaf toughness but not in water content. The water content varied among the individual plants. Larval growth of C. aeneicollis did not differ among the five species in the laboratory, but it varied among the individual plants and it was related to the water content. In the field, C. aeneicollis larvae developed equally rapidly on the salicylate-poor S. lutea and on the salicylate-rich S. orestera. Larval survival was greater on S. orestera than on S. lutea in one year (1986), but there was no difference between them during three succeeding years. In another survivorship experiment, larval survival was low on the medium-salicylate S. geyeriana, but high on the salicylate-poor S. boothi and on S. orestera. Larval survival in the field was related to the larval growth and water content that had been previously measured in the laboratory. These results showed that the predicted relationship between the host plant chemistry and larval survival did not usually exist for C. aeneicollis. One possible reason for this was that the most important natural enemies were specialist predators that were unaffected by the host-derived defensive secretion. One specialist predator, Symmorphus cristatus (Hymenoptera: Eumenidae), probably caused much of the mortality observed in this study. I discuss the importance of other specialist predators to salicin-using leaf beetles.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="PubMed-not-MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">28313629</PMID><DateRevised><Year>2019</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>20</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1432-1939</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>97</Volume><Issue>3</Issue><PubDate><Year>1994</Year><Month>Apr</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Oecologia</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Oecologia</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Host-plant effects on larval survival of a salicin-using leaf beetle Chrysomela aeneicollis Schaeffer (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae).</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>342-353</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1007/BF00317324</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Several species of willow leaf beetles use hostplant salicin to produce a defensive secretion that consists of salicylaldehyde. Generalist arthropod predators such as ants, ladybird beetles, and spiders are repelled by this secretion. The beetle larvae produce very little secretion when they feed on willows that lack salicylates, and salicin-using beetles prefer salicylate-rich willows over salicylate-poor ones. This preference may exist because the larvae are better defended against natural enemies on salicylate-rich willows. If this is true, the larvae should survive longer on those willows in nature. However, this prediction has not been tested. I determined the larval growth and survival of Chrysomela aeneicollis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) on five willow species (Salix boothi, S. drummondiana, S. geyeriana, S. lutea, and S. orestera). These species differed in their salicylate chemistries and in leaf toughness but not in water content. The water content varied among the individual plants. Larval growth of C. aeneicollis did not differ among the five species in the laboratory, but it varied among the individual plants and it was related to the water content. In the field, C. aeneicollis larvae developed equally rapidly on the salicylate-poor S. lutea and on the salicylate-rich S. orestera. Larval survival was greater on S. orestera than on S. lutea in one year (1986), but there was no difference between them during three succeeding years. In another survivorship experiment, larval survival was low on the medium-salicylate S. geyeriana, but high on the salicylate-poor S. boothi and on S. orestera. Larval survival in the field was related to the larval growth and water content that had been previously measured in the laboratory. These results showed that the predicted relationship between the host plant chemistry and larval survival did not usually exist for C. aeneicollis. One possible reason for this was that the most important natural enemies were specialist predators that were unaffected by the host-derived defensive secretion. One specialist predator, Symmorphus cristatus (Hymenoptera: Eumenidae), probably caused much of the mortality observed in this study. I discuss the importance of other specialist predators to salicin-using leaf beetles.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Rank</LastName><ForeName>Nathan Egan</ForeName><Initials>NE</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Zoology, University of California-Davis, 95616, Davis, CA, USA.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>The White Mountain Research Station, University of California, 93514, Bishop, CA, USA.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Germany</Country><MedlineTA>Oecologia</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0150372</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0029-8549</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Chrysomela/Salix interaction</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Larval performance</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Predation Larval survivorship</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Specialist predators</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>1993</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>28</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>1993</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>03</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2017</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>18</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>1994</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>1994</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28313629</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/BF00317324</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">10.1007/BF00317324</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>J Chem Ecol. 1984 Mar;10(3):499-520</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24318555</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Oecologia. 1980 Sep;46(3):347-353</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28310043</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Science. 1978 Aug 25;201(4357):745-7</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17750235</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Oecologia. 1984 Nov;64(3):369-374</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28311453</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Evolution. 1989 Jan;43(1):223-225</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28568501</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Oecologia. 1993 Mar;95(1):22-29</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28313307</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Oecologia. 1982 Jan;52(3):417-423</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28310406</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Evolution. 1993 Feb;47(1):166-175</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28568107</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Planta Med. 1989 Feb;55(1):55-8</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17262254</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Oecologia. 1992 Apr;90(1):95-101</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28312276</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Oecologia. 1987 Nov;74(1):144-148</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28310428</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Oecologia. 1986 Aug;70(1):106-112</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28311293</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Oecologia. 1985 Aug;67(1):52-56</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28309845</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Science. 1985 Aug 16;229(4714):649-51</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17739376</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Annu Rev Entomol. 1990;35:421-46</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">2405772</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Oecologia. 1977 Sep;28(3):269-287</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28309252</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Evolution. 1980 Mar;34(2):342-355</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28563428</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/WillowV1/Data/Main/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002317 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002317 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Bois
|area= WillowV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:28313629
|texte= Host-plant effects on larval survival of a salicin-using leaf beetle Chrysomela aeneicollis Schaeffer (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae).
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:28313629" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a WillowV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. |  |