Influence of immigration on epiphytic bacterial populations on navel orange leaves
Identifieur interne : 000B56 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000B55; suivant : 000B57Influence of immigration on epiphytic bacterial populations on navel orange leaves
Auteurs : S. E. Lindow ; G. L. AndersenSource :
- Applied and environmental microbiology [ 0099-2240 ] ; 1996.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Factors that influenced the increase in epiphytic bacterial population size on navel orange leaves during winter months were investigated to test the assumption that such populations were the result of multiplication on orange leaves. The population sizes of bacteria of different kinds, including ice nucleation-active (Ice+) bacteria, were from 6- to 30-fold larger on leaves of navel orange trees adjacent to other plant species than on trees growing near other citrus species. Total and Ice+ bacterial population sizes on other plant species growing near navel orange trees were from 18- to 60-fold and 2- to 18,000-fold larger, respectively, than on navel orange trees. About twice the number of bacterial cells of a given type were deposited onto petri dishes opened simultaneously in navel orange orchards with other plant species nearby as in orchards surrounded by citrus trees. Epiphytic bacteria and airborne bacteria were more numerous near the upwind edge of orchards bordering on other plant species, but not in orchards adjacent to other citrus trees, and decreased with distance from other plant species. Navel orange leaves also exhibited progressive increases in the ability to supercool as a function of increasing distance from the upwind edge of orchards adjacent to other plant species but not in orchards adjacent to other citrus trees. While the population size of three different bacterial strains remained nearly constant for 60 days after inoculation, total bacterial populations increased more than 50-fold during this period. These results suggest that immigration of bacteria from plants having high epiphytic bacterial populations could account for most, if not all, of the seasonal increase in bacterial populations on navel orange leaves and have important implications for procedures to modify bacterial communities on leaves.
Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)
Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.
pA |
|
---|
Format Inist (serveur)
NO : | PASCAL 96-0442206 INIST |
---|---|
ET : | Influence of immigration on epiphytic bacterial populations on navel orange leaves |
AU : | LINDOW (S. E.); ANDERSEN (G. L.) |
AF : | Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California/Berkeley, California 94720-3110/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 2 aut.) |
DT : | Publication en série; Niveau analytique |
SO : | Applied and environmental microbiology; ISSN 0099-2240; Coden AEMIDF; Etats-Unis; Da. 1996; Vol. 62; No. 8; Pp. 2978-2987; Bibl. 48 ref. |
LA : | Anglais |
EA : | Factors that influenced the increase in epiphytic bacterial population size on navel orange leaves during winter months were investigated to test the assumption that such populations were the result of multiplication on orange leaves. The population sizes of bacteria of different kinds, including ice nucleation-active (Ice+) bacteria, were from 6- to 30-fold larger on leaves of navel orange trees adjacent to other plant species than on trees growing near other citrus species. Total and Ice+ bacterial population sizes on other plant species growing near navel orange trees were from 18- to 60-fold and 2- to 18,000-fold larger, respectively, than on navel orange trees. About twice the number of bacterial cells of a given type were deposited onto petri dishes opened simultaneously in navel orange orchards with other plant species nearby as in orchards surrounded by citrus trees. Epiphytic bacteria and airborne bacteria were more numerous near the upwind edge of orchards bordering on other plant species, but not in orchards adjacent to other citrus trees, and decreased with distance from other plant species. Navel orange leaves also exhibited progressive increases in the ability to supercool as a function of increasing distance from the upwind edge of orchards adjacent to other plant species but not in orchards adjacent to other citrus trees. While the population size of three different bacterial strains remained nearly constant for 60 days after inoculation, total bacterial populations increased more than 50-fold during this period. These results suggest that immigration of bacteria from plants having high epiphytic bacterial populations could account for most, if not all, of the seasonal increase in bacterial populations on navel orange leaves and have important implications for procedures to modify bacterial communities on leaves. |
CC : | 002A14C05 |
FD : | Citrus sinensis; Bactérie; Epiphyte; Dynamique population; Migration population; Variation saisonnière; Essai en champ; Verger; Californie |
FG : | Rutaceae; Dicotyledones; Angiospermae; Spermatophyta; Etats Unis; Amérique du Nord; Amérique; Relation microorganisme végétal; Agrume |
ED : | Citrus sinensis; Bacteria; Epiphyte; Population dynamics; Population migration; Seasonal variation; Field experiment; Orchard; California |
EG : | Rutaceae; Dicotyledones; Angiospermae; Spermatophyta; United States; North America; America; Vegetal microorganism relation; Citrus fruit |
SD : | Citrus sinensis; Bacteria; Epífito; Dinámica población; Migración población; Variación estacional; Ensayo en campo; Huerto; California |
LO : | INIST-7195.354000063749620470 |
ID : | 96-0442206 |
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:96-0442206Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Influence of immigration on epiphytic bacterial populations on navel orange leaves</title>
<author><name sortKey="Lindow, S E" sort="Lindow, S E" uniqKey="Lindow S" first="S. E." last="Lindow">S. E. Lindow</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California</s1>
<s2>Berkeley, California 94720-3110</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Andersen, G L" sort="Andersen, G L" uniqKey="Andersen G" first="G. L." last="Andersen">G. L. Andersen</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California</s1>
<s2>Berkeley, California 94720-3110</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">96-0442206</idno>
<date when="1996">1996</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 96-0442206 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:96-0442206</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000B56</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Influence of immigration on epiphytic bacterial populations on navel orange leaves</title>
<author><name sortKey="Lindow, S E" sort="Lindow, S E" uniqKey="Lindow S" first="S. E." last="Lindow">S. E. Lindow</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California</s1>
<s2>Berkeley, California 94720-3110</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Andersen, G L" sort="Andersen, G L" uniqKey="Andersen G" first="G. L." last="Andersen">G. L. Andersen</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California</s1>
<s2>Berkeley, California 94720-3110</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Applied and environmental microbiology</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Appl. environ. microbiol.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0099-2240</idno>
<imprint><date when="1996">1996</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Applied and environmental microbiology</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Appl. environ. microbiol.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0099-2240</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Bacteria</term>
<term>California</term>
<term>Citrus sinensis</term>
<term>Epiphyte</term>
<term>Field experiment</term>
<term>Orchard</term>
<term>Population dynamics</term>
<term>Population migration</term>
<term>Seasonal variation</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Citrus sinensis</term>
<term>Bactérie</term>
<term>Epiphyte</term>
<term>Dynamique population</term>
<term>Migration population</term>
<term>Variation saisonnière</term>
<term>Essai en champ</term>
<term>Verger</term>
<term>Californie</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Factors that influenced the increase in epiphytic bacterial population size on navel orange leaves during winter months were investigated to test the assumption that such populations were the result of multiplication on orange leaves. The population sizes of bacteria of different kinds, including ice nucleation-active (Ice<sup>+</sup>
) bacteria, were from 6- to 30-fold larger on leaves of navel orange trees adjacent to other plant species than on trees growing near other citrus species. Total and Ice<sup>+</sup>
bacterial population sizes on other plant species growing near navel orange trees were from 18- to 60-fold and 2- to 18,000-fold larger, respectively, than on navel orange trees. About twice the number of bacterial cells of a given type were deposited onto petri dishes opened simultaneously in navel orange orchards with other plant species nearby as in orchards surrounded by citrus trees. Epiphytic bacteria and airborne bacteria were more numerous near the upwind edge of orchards bordering on other plant species, but not in orchards adjacent to other citrus trees, and decreased with distance from other plant species. Navel orange leaves also exhibited progressive increases in the ability to supercool as a function of increasing distance from the upwind edge of orchards adjacent to other plant species but not in orchards adjacent to other citrus trees. While the population size of three different bacterial strains remained nearly constant for 60 days after inoculation, total bacterial populations increased more than 50-fold during this period. These results suggest that immigration of bacteria from plants having high epiphytic bacterial populations could account for most, if not all, of the seasonal increase in bacterial populations on navel orange leaves and have important implications for procedures to modify bacterial communities on leaves.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0099-2240</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>AEMIDF</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Appl. environ. microbiol.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>62</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>8</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Influence of immigration on epiphytic bacterial populations on navel orange leaves</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>LINDOW (S. E.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>ANDERSEN (G. L.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California</s1>
<s2>Berkeley, California 94720-3110</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>2978-2987</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>1996</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>7195</s2>
<s5>354000063749620470</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 1996 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>48 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>96-0442206</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Applied and environmental microbiology</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Factors that influenced the increase in epiphytic bacterial population size on navel orange leaves during winter months were investigated to test the assumption that such populations were the result of multiplication on orange leaves. The population sizes of bacteria of different kinds, including ice nucleation-active (Ice<sup>+</sup>
) bacteria, were from 6- to 30-fold larger on leaves of navel orange trees adjacent to other plant species than on trees growing near other citrus species. Total and Ice<sup>+</sup>
bacterial population sizes on other plant species growing near navel orange trees were from 18- to 60-fold and 2- to 18,000-fold larger, respectively, than on navel orange trees. About twice the number of bacterial cells of a given type were deposited onto petri dishes opened simultaneously in navel orange orchards with other plant species nearby as in orchards surrounded by citrus trees. Epiphytic bacteria and airborne bacteria were more numerous near the upwind edge of orchards bordering on other plant species, but not in orchards adjacent to other citrus trees, and decreased with distance from other plant species. Navel orange leaves also exhibited progressive increases in the ability to supercool as a function of increasing distance from the upwind edge of orchards adjacent to other plant species but not in orchards adjacent to other citrus trees. While the population size of three different bacterial strains remained nearly constant for 60 days after inoculation, total bacterial populations increased more than 50-fold during this period. These results suggest that immigration of bacteria from plants having high epiphytic bacterial populations could account for most, if not all, of the seasonal increase in bacterial populations on navel orange leaves and have important implications for procedures to modify bacterial communities on leaves.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002A14C05</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Citrus sinensis</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Citrus sinensis</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Citrus sinensis</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Bactérie</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Bacteria</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Bacteria</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Epiphyte</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Epiphyte</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Epífito</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Dynamique population</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Population dynamics</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Dinámica población</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Migration population</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Population migration</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Migración población</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Variation saisonnière</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Seasonal variation</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Variación estacional</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Essai en champ</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Field experiment</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Ensayo en campo</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Verger</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Orchard</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Huerto</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Californie</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>California</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>California</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Rutaceae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Rutaceae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Rutaceae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Dicotyledones</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Dicotyledones</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Dicotyledones</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Angiospermae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Angiospermae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Angiospermae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Spermatophyta</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Spermatophyta</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Spermatophyta</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etats Unis</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>United States</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="GER"><s0>Vereinigte Staaten</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estados Unidos</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Amérique du Nord</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>North America</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="GER"><s0>Nordamerika</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>America del norte</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Amérique</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>America</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>America</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Relation microorganisme végétal</s0>
<s5>43</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Vegetal microorganism relation</s0>
<s5>43</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Relación microorganismo vegetal</s0>
<s5>43</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Agrume</s0>
<s5>75</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Citrus fruit</s0>
<s5>75</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Agrios</s0>
<s5>75</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>303</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 96-0442206 INIST</NO>
<ET>Influence of immigration on epiphytic bacterial populations on navel orange leaves</ET>
<AU>LINDOW (S. E.); ANDERSEN (G. L.)</AU>
<AF>Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California/Berkeley, California 94720-3110/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 2 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Applied and environmental microbiology; ISSN 0099-2240; Coden AEMIDF; Etats-Unis; Da. 1996; Vol. 62; No. 8; Pp. 2978-2987; Bibl. 48 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Factors that influenced the increase in epiphytic bacterial population size on navel orange leaves during winter months were investigated to test the assumption that such populations were the result of multiplication on orange leaves. The population sizes of bacteria of different kinds, including ice nucleation-active (Ice<sup>+</sup>
) bacteria, were from 6- to 30-fold larger on leaves of navel orange trees adjacent to other plant species than on trees growing near other citrus species. Total and Ice<sup>+</sup>
bacterial population sizes on other plant species growing near navel orange trees were from 18- to 60-fold and 2- to 18,000-fold larger, respectively, than on navel orange trees. About twice the number of bacterial cells of a given type were deposited onto petri dishes opened simultaneously in navel orange orchards with other plant species nearby as in orchards surrounded by citrus trees. Epiphytic bacteria and airborne bacteria were more numerous near the upwind edge of orchards bordering on other plant species, but not in orchards adjacent to other citrus trees, and decreased with distance from other plant species. Navel orange leaves also exhibited progressive increases in the ability to supercool as a function of increasing distance from the upwind edge of orchards adjacent to other plant species but not in orchards adjacent to other citrus trees. While the population size of three different bacterial strains remained nearly constant for 60 days after inoculation, total bacterial populations increased more than 50-fold during this period. These results suggest that immigration of bacteria from plants having high epiphytic bacterial populations could account for most, if not all, of the seasonal increase in bacterial populations on navel orange leaves and have important implications for procedures to modify bacterial communities on leaves.</EA>
<CC>002A14C05</CC>
<FD>Citrus sinensis; Bactérie; Epiphyte; Dynamique population; Migration population; Variation saisonnière; Essai en champ; Verger; Californie</FD>
<FG>Rutaceae; Dicotyledones; Angiospermae; Spermatophyta; Etats Unis; Amérique du Nord; Amérique; Relation microorganisme végétal; Agrume</FG>
<ED>Citrus sinensis; Bacteria; Epiphyte; Population dynamics; Population migration; Seasonal variation; Field experiment; Orchard; California</ED>
<EG>Rutaceae; Dicotyledones; Angiospermae; Spermatophyta; United States; North America; America; Vegetal microorganism relation; Citrus fruit</EG>
<SD>Citrus sinensis; Bacteria; Epífito; Dinámica población; Migración población; Variación estacional; Ensayo en campo; Huerto; California</SD>
<LO>INIST-7195.354000063749620470</LO>
<ID>96-0442206</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Bois/explor/OrangerV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000B56 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000B56 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Bois |area= OrangerV1 |flux= PascalFrancis |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= Pascal:96-0442206 |texte= Influence of immigration on epiphytic bacterial populations on navel orange leaves }}
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.25. | ![]() |