Responses to flooding and drought stress by two citrus rootstock seedlings with different water-use efficiency
Identifieur interne : 000468 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000467; suivant : 000469Responses to flooding and drought stress by two citrus rootstock seedlings with different water-use efficiency
Auteurs : Francisco Garcia-Sanchez ; James. P. Syvertsen ; Vicente Gimeno ; Pablo Botia ; Juan G. Perez-PerezSource :
- Physiologia Plantarum : (København. 1948) [ 0031-9317 ] ; 2007.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Leaf water relations, net gas exchange and leaf and root constituent responses to 9 days of drought stress (DS) or soil flooding were studied in 6-month-old seedlings of Carrizo citrange [Citrus sinensis (L.) Osb. x Poncirus trifoliata L.; Carr] and Cleopatra mandarin (Citrus resnhi Hort. ex Tanaka; Cleo) growing in containers of native sand in the greenhouse. At the end of the drought period, both species had similar minimum stem water potentials but Cleo had higher leaf relative water content (RWC) and higher leaf osmotic potential at full turgor (Ψ100π) than Carr. Flooding had no effect on RWC but osmotic adjustment (OA) and Ψ100π were higher in Cleo than in Carr. Net CO2 assimilation rate (ACO2) in leaves was decreased more by drought than by flooding in both species but especially in Carr. Leaf water-use efficiency (ACO2/transpiration) was lower in Carr and was decreased more by DS and flooding stress than in Cleo. Higher values of intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) in stressed plants than in control plants indicated that non-stomatal factors including chlorophyll degradation and chlorophyll fluorescence [maximum quantum efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm, where Fm is the maximum fluorescence and F0, minimum fluorescence in dark-adapted leaves)] were more important limitations on ACO2 than stomatal conductance. In both genotypes, leaf proline was increased by drought but not by flooding, whereas both stresses increased proline in roots. Soluble sugars in leaves were increased by DS, and flooding decreased leaf sugars in Cleo. In general, DS tended to increase the concentrations of Ca, K, Mg, Na and Cl in both leaves and roots, whereas flooding tended to decrease these ions with the exception of leaf Ca in Cleo. Based on water relations and net gas exchange, Cleo was more tolerant to short-term DS and flooding stress than Carr.
Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)
Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.
pA |
|
---|
Format Inist (serveur)
NO : | PASCAL 07-0369798 INIST |
---|---|
ET : | Responses to flooding and drought stress by two citrus rootstock seedlings with different water-use efficiency |
AU : | GARCIA-SANCHEZ (Francisco); SYVERTSEN (James. P.); GIMENO (Vicente); BOTIA (Pablo); PEREZ-PEREZ (Juan G.) |
AF : | Citrus Research and Education Center, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, 700 Experiment Station Road/Lake Alfred, FL 33850/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 2 aut.); Centro de Edafologia y Biologia Aplicada del Segura, CSIC, Campus Universitario de Espinardo, Espinardo/30100 Murcia/Espagne (1 aut., 3 aut.); Departament of Citriculture, Instituto Murciano de Investigación y Desarrollo Agrario y Alimentario/30150 La Alberca, Murcia/Espagne (4 aut., 5 aut.) |
DT : | Publication en série; Niveau analytique |
SO : | Physiologia Plantarum : (København. 1948); ISSN 0031-9317; Coden PHPLAI; Royaume-Uni; Da. 2007; Vol. 130; No. 4; Pp. 532-542; Bibl. 1 p.3/4 |
LA : | Anglais |
EA : | Leaf water relations, net gas exchange and leaf and root constituent responses to 9 days of drought stress (DS) or soil flooding were studied in 6-month-old seedlings of Carrizo citrange [Citrus sinensis (L.) Osb. x Poncirus trifoliata L.; Carr] and Cleopatra mandarin (Citrus resnhi Hort. ex Tanaka; Cleo) growing in containers of native sand in the greenhouse. At the end of the drought period, both species had similar minimum stem water potentials but Cleo had higher leaf relative water content (RWC) and higher leaf osmotic potential at full turgor (Ψ100π) than Carr. Flooding had no effect on RWC but osmotic adjustment (OA) and Ψ100π were higher in Cleo than in Carr. Net CO2 assimilation rate (ACO2) in leaves was decreased more by drought than by flooding in both species but especially in Carr. Leaf water-use efficiency (ACO2/transpiration) was lower in Carr and was decreased more by DS and flooding stress than in Cleo. Higher values of intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) in stressed plants than in control plants indicated that non-stomatal factors including chlorophyll degradation and chlorophyll fluorescence [maximum quantum efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm, where Fm is the maximum fluorescence and F0, minimum fluorescence in dark-adapted leaves)] were more important limitations on ACO2 than stomatal conductance. In both genotypes, leaf proline was increased by drought but not by flooding, whereas both stresses increased proline in roots. Soluble sugars in leaves were increased by DS, and flooding decreased leaf sugars in Cleo. In general, DS tended to increase the concentrations of Ca, K, Mg, Na and Cl in both leaves and roots, whereas flooding tended to decrease these ions with the exception of leaf Ca in Cleo. Based on water relations and net gas exchange, Cleo was more tolerant to short-term DS and flooding stress than Carr. |
CC : | 002A32E04 |
FD : | Sécheresse; Stress; Efficacité utilisation eau; Citrus |
FG : | Rutaceae; Dicotyledones; Angiospermae; Spermatophyta |
ED : | Drought; Stress; Water use efficiency; Citrus |
EG : | Rutaceae; Dicotyledones; Angiospermae; Spermatophyta |
SD : | Sequedad; Estrés; Eficacia utilización agua; Citrus |
LO : | INIST-2583.354000161406010060 |
ID : | 07-0369798 |
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:07-0369798Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Responses to flooding and drought stress by two citrus rootstock seedlings with different water-use efficiency</title>
<author><name sortKey="Garcia Sanchez, Francisco" sort="Garcia Sanchez, Francisco" uniqKey="Garcia Sanchez F" first="Francisco" last="Garcia-Sanchez">Francisco Garcia-Sanchez</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Citrus Research and Education Center, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, 700 Experiment Station Road</s1>
<s2>Lake Alfred, FL 33850</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Centro de Edafologia y Biologia Aplicada del Segura, CSIC, Campus Universitario de Espinardo, Espinardo</s1>
<s2>30100 Murcia</s2>
<s3>ESP</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Syvertsen, James P" sort="Syvertsen, James P" uniqKey="Syvertsen J" first="James. P." last="Syvertsen">James. P. Syvertsen</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Citrus Research and Education Center, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, 700 Experiment Station Road</s1>
<s2>Lake Alfred, FL 33850</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Gimeno, Vicente" sort="Gimeno, Vicente" uniqKey="Gimeno V" first="Vicente" last="Gimeno">Vicente Gimeno</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Centro de Edafologia y Biologia Aplicada del Segura, CSIC, Campus Universitario de Espinardo, Espinardo</s1>
<s2>30100 Murcia</s2>
<s3>ESP</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Botia, Pablo" sort="Botia, Pablo" uniqKey="Botia P" first="Pablo" last="Botia">Pablo Botia</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Departament of Citriculture, Instituto Murciano de Investigación y Desarrollo Agrario y Alimentario</s1>
<s2>30150 La Alberca, Murcia</s2>
<s3>ESP</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Perez Perez, Juan G" sort="Perez Perez, Juan G" uniqKey="Perez Perez J" first="Juan G." last="Perez-Perez">Juan G. Perez-Perez</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Departament of Citriculture, Instituto Murciano de Investigación y Desarrollo Agrario y Alimentario</s1>
<s2>30150 La Alberca, Murcia</s2>
<s3>ESP</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">07-0369798</idno>
<date when="2007">2007</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 07-0369798 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:07-0369798</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000468</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Responses to flooding and drought stress by two citrus rootstock seedlings with different water-use efficiency</title>
<author><name sortKey="Garcia Sanchez, Francisco" sort="Garcia Sanchez, Francisco" uniqKey="Garcia Sanchez F" first="Francisco" last="Garcia-Sanchez">Francisco Garcia-Sanchez</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Citrus Research and Education Center, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, 700 Experiment Station Road</s1>
<s2>Lake Alfred, FL 33850</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Centro de Edafologia y Biologia Aplicada del Segura, CSIC, Campus Universitario de Espinardo, Espinardo</s1>
<s2>30100 Murcia</s2>
<s3>ESP</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Syvertsen, James P" sort="Syvertsen, James P" uniqKey="Syvertsen J" first="James. P." last="Syvertsen">James. P. Syvertsen</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Citrus Research and Education Center, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, 700 Experiment Station Road</s1>
<s2>Lake Alfred, FL 33850</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Gimeno, Vicente" sort="Gimeno, Vicente" uniqKey="Gimeno V" first="Vicente" last="Gimeno">Vicente Gimeno</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Centro de Edafologia y Biologia Aplicada del Segura, CSIC, Campus Universitario de Espinardo, Espinardo</s1>
<s2>30100 Murcia</s2>
<s3>ESP</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Botia, Pablo" sort="Botia, Pablo" uniqKey="Botia P" first="Pablo" last="Botia">Pablo Botia</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Departament of Citriculture, Instituto Murciano de Investigación y Desarrollo Agrario y Alimentario</s1>
<s2>30150 La Alberca, Murcia</s2>
<s3>ESP</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Perez Perez, Juan G" sort="Perez Perez, Juan G" uniqKey="Perez Perez J" first="Juan G." last="Perez-Perez">Juan G. Perez-Perez</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Departament of Citriculture, Instituto Murciano de Investigación y Desarrollo Agrario y Alimentario</s1>
<s2>30150 La Alberca, Murcia</s2>
<s3>ESP</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Physiologia Plantarum : (København. 1948)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Physiol. Plant. : (Kbh., 1948)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0031-9317</idno>
<imprint><date when="2007">2007</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Physiologia Plantarum : (København. 1948)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Physiol. Plant. : (Kbh., 1948)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0031-9317</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Citrus</term>
<term>Drought</term>
<term>Stress</term>
<term>Water use efficiency</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Sécheresse</term>
<term>Stress</term>
<term>Efficacité utilisation eau</term>
<term>Citrus</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Leaf water relations, net gas exchange and leaf and root constituent responses to 9 days of drought stress (DS) or soil flooding were studied in 6-month-old seedlings of Carrizo citrange [Citrus sinensis (L.) Osb. x Poncirus trifoliata L.; Carr] and Cleopatra mandarin (Citrus resnhi Hort. ex Tanaka; Cleo) growing in containers of native sand in the greenhouse. At the end of the drought period, both species had similar minimum stem water potentials but Cleo had higher leaf relative water content (RWC) and higher leaf osmotic potential at full turgor (Ψ<sup>100</sup>
<sub>π</sub>
) than Carr. Flooding had no effect on RWC but osmotic adjustment (OA) and Ψ<sup>100</sup>
π were higher in Cleo than in Carr. Net CO<sub>2</sub>
assimilation rate (A<sub>CO2</sub>
) in leaves was decreased more by drought than by flooding in both species but especially in Carr. Leaf water-use efficiency (A<sub>CO2</sub>
/transpiration) was lower in Carr and was decreased more by DS and flooding stress than in Cleo. Higher values of intercellular CO<sub>2</sub>
concentration (C<sub>i</sub>
) in stressed plants than in control plants indicated that non-stomatal factors including chlorophyll degradation and chlorophyll fluorescence [maximum quantum efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm, where Fm is the maximum fluorescence and F<sub>0</sub>
, minimum fluorescence in dark-adapted leaves)] were more important limitations on A<sub>CO2</sub>
than stomatal conductance. In both genotypes, leaf proline was increased by drought but not by flooding, whereas both stresses increased proline in roots. Soluble sugars in leaves were increased by DS, and flooding decreased leaf sugars in Cleo. In general, DS tended to increase the concentrations of Ca, K, Mg, Na and Cl in both leaves and roots, whereas flooding tended to decrease these ions with the exception of leaf Ca in Cleo. Based on water relations and net gas exchange, Cleo was more tolerant to short-term DS and flooding stress than Carr.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0031-9317</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>PHPLAI</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Physiol. Plant. : (Kbh., 1948)</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>130</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>4</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Responses to flooding and drought stress by two citrus rootstock seedlings with different water-use efficiency</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>GARCIA-SANCHEZ (Francisco)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>SYVERTSEN (James. P.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>GIMENO (Vicente)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>BOTIA (Pablo)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1"><s1>PEREZ-PEREZ (Juan G.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Citrus Research and Education Center, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, 700 Experiment Station Road</s1>
<s2>Lake Alfred, FL 33850</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>Centro de Edafologia y Biologia Aplicada del Segura, CSIC, Campus Universitario de Espinardo, Espinardo</s1>
<s2>30100 Murcia</s2>
<s3>ESP</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="03"><s1>Departament of Citriculture, Instituto Murciano de Investigación y Desarrollo Agrario y Alimentario</s1>
<s2>30150 La Alberca, Murcia</s2>
<s3>ESP</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>532-542</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2007</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>2583</s2>
<s5>354000161406010060</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2007 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>1 p.3/4</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>07-0369798</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Physiologia Plantarum : (København. 1948)</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>GBR</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Leaf water relations, net gas exchange and leaf and root constituent responses to 9 days of drought stress (DS) or soil flooding were studied in 6-month-old seedlings of Carrizo citrange [Citrus sinensis (L.) Osb. x Poncirus trifoliata L.; Carr] and Cleopatra mandarin (Citrus resnhi Hort. ex Tanaka; Cleo) growing in containers of native sand in the greenhouse. At the end of the drought period, both species had similar minimum stem water potentials but Cleo had higher leaf relative water content (RWC) and higher leaf osmotic potential at full turgor (Ψ<sup>100</sup>
<sub>π</sub>
) than Carr. Flooding had no effect on RWC but osmotic adjustment (OA) and Ψ<sup>100</sup>
π were higher in Cleo than in Carr. Net CO<sub>2</sub>
assimilation rate (A<sub>CO2</sub>
) in leaves was decreased more by drought than by flooding in both species but especially in Carr. Leaf water-use efficiency (A<sub>CO2</sub>
/transpiration) was lower in Carr and was decreased more by DS and flooding stress than in Cleo. Higher values of intercellular CO<sub>2</sub>
concentration (C<sub>i</sub>
) in stressed plants than in control plants indicated that non-stomatal factors including chlorophyll degradation and chlorophyll fluorescence [maximum quantum efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm, where Fm is the maximum fluorescence and F<sub>0</sub>
, minimum fluorescence in dark-adapted leaves)] were more important limitations on A<sub>CO2</sub>
than stomatal conductance. In both genotypes, leaf proline was increased by drought but not by flooding, whereas both stresses increased proline in roots. Soluble sugars in leaves were increased by DS, and flooding decreased leaf sugars in Cleo. In general, DS tended to increase the concentrations of Ca, K, Mg, Na and Cl in both leaves and roots, whereas flooding tended to decrease these ions with the exception of leaf Ca in Cleo. Based on water relations and net gas exchange, Cleo was more tolerant to short-term DS and flooding stress than Carr.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002A32E04</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Sécheresse</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Drought</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Sequedad</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Stress</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Stress</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estrés</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Efficacité utilisation eau</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Water use efficiency</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Eficacia utilización agua</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Citrus</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Citrus</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Citrus</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Rutaceae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Rutaceae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Rutaceae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Dicotyledones</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Dicotyledones</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Dicotyledones</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Angiospermae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Angiospermae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Angiospermae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Spermatophyta</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Spermatophyta</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Spermatophyta</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>239</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 07-0369798 INIST</NO>
<ET>Responses to flooding and drought stress by two citrus rootstock seedlings with different water-use efficiency</ET>
<AU>GARCIA-SANCHEZ (Francisco); SYVERTSEN (James. P.); GIMENO (Vicente); BOTIA (Pablo); PEREZ-PEREZ (Juan G.)</AU>
<AF>Citrus Research and Education Center, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, 700 Experiment Station Road/Lake Alfred, FL 33850/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 2 aut.); Centro de Edafologia y Biologia Aplicada del Segura, CSIC, Campus Universitario de Espinardo, Espinardo/30100 Murcia/Espagne (1 aut., 3 aut.); Departament of Citriculture, Instituto Murciano de Investigación y Desarrollo Agrario y Alimentario/30150 La Alberca, Murcia/Espagne (4 aut., 5 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Physiologia Plantarum : (København. 1948); ISSN 0031-9317; Coden PHPLAI; Royaume-Uni; Da. 2007; Vol. 130; No. 4; Pp. 532-542; Bibl. 1 p.3/4</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Leaf water relations, net gas exchange and leaf and root constituent responses to 9 days of drought stress (DS) or soil flooding were studied in 6-month-old seedlings of Carrizo citrange [Citrus sinensis (L.) Osb. x Poncirus trifoliata L.; Carr] and Cleopatra mandarin (Citrus resnhi Hort. ex Tanaka; Cleo) growing in containers of native sand in the greenhouse. At the end of the drought period, both species had similar minimum stem water potentials but Cleo had higher leaf relative water content (RWC) and higher leaf osmotic potential at full turgor (Ψ<sup>100</sup>
<sub>π</sub>
) than Carr. Flooding had no effect on RWC but osmotic adjustment (OA) and Ψ<sup>100</sup>
π were higher in Cleo than in Carr. Net CO<sub>2</sub>
assimilation rate (A<sub>CO2</sub>
) in leaves was decreased more by drought than by flooding in both species but especially in Carr. Leaf water-use efficiency (A<sub>CO2</sub>
/transpiration) was lower in Carr and was decreased more by DS and flooding stress than in Cleo. Higher values of intercellular CO<sub>2</sub>
concentration (C<sub>i</sub>
) in stressed plants than in control plants indicated that non-stomatal factors including chlorophyll degradation and chlorophyll fluorescence [maximum quantum efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm, where Fm is the maximum fluorescence and F<sub>0</sub>
, minimum fluorescence in dark-adapted leaves)] were more important limitations on A<sub>CO2</sub>
than stomatal conductance. In both genotypes, leaf proline was increased by drought but not by flooding, whereas both stresses increased proline in roots. Soluble sugars in leaves were increased by DS, and flooding decreased leaf sugars in Cleo. In general, DS tended to increase the concentrations of Ca, K, Mg, Na and Cl in both leaves and roots, whereas flooding tended to decrease these ions with the exception of leaf Ca in Cleo. Based on water relations and net gas exchange, Cleo was more tolerant to short-term DS and flooding stress than Carr.</EA>
<CC>002A32E04</CC>
<FD>Sécheresse; Stress; Efficacité utilisation eau; Citrus</FD>
<FG>Rutaceae; Dicotyledones; Angiospermae; Spermatophyta</FG>
<ED>Drought; Stress; Water use efficiency; Citrus</ED>
<EG>Rutaceae; Dicotyledones; Angiospermae; Spermatophyta</EG>
<SD>Sequedad; Estrés; Eficacia utilización agua; Citrus</SD>
<LO>INIST-2583.354000161406010060</LO>
<ID>07-0369798</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Bois/explor/OrangerV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000468 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000468 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Bois |area= OrangerV1 |flux= PascalFrancis |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= Pascal:07-0369798 |texte= Responses to flooding and drought stress by two citrus rootstock seedlings with different water-use efficiency }}
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.25. | ![]() |