Serveur d'exploration sur l'oranger

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Mechanical Harvesting Increases Leaf and Stem Debris in Loads of Mechanically Harvested Citrus Fruit

Identifieur interne : 000226 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000225; suivant : 000227

Mechanical Harvesting Increases Leaf and Stem Debris in Loads of Mechanically Harvested Citrus Fruit

Auteurs : Timothy M. Spann ; Michelle D. Danyluk

Source :

RBID : Pascal:10-0423654

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

The adoption of mechanical harvesting for processing oranges is a major objective of the Florida citrus industry. A number of issues have slowed the adoption of this new technology, including the observation that the amount of leaves, stems, and dead branches (collectively termed "debris") is greater in mechanically harvested than in hand-harvested loads of fruit. This debris increases transportation and processing costs. The objective of this research was to determine the amount and types of debris in mechanically harvested loads of sweet oranges compared with hand-harvested controls. Mechanical harvesting was found to increase the amount of debris per load of fruit by as much as 250% compared with hand-harvested fruit. This translates into ≃108 kg of debris compared with 71 kg (fresh weight) per 27 t load for mechanically harvested and hand-harvested fruit, respectively. Across harvesting method, leaves were the largest component of debris, accounting for ≃60% of total debris, small stems (less than 5 mm diameter) accounted for ≃35%, and the remaining 5% was large stems (greater than 5 mm diameter). In addition, the amount of sand on the surface of mechanically harvested fruit that was picked up from the orchard floor was found to be up to 10 times greater compared with hand-harvested controls. Engineers developing debris elimination systems for mechanical harvesting systems can use the data from this study to determine the performance requirements of their systems. The data are also useful for economic analyses of the costs of mechanical harvesting.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

pA  
A01 01  1    @0 0018-5345
A02 01      @0 HJHSAR
A03   1    @0 HortScience
A05       @2 45
A06       @2 8
A08 01  1  ENG  @1 Mechanical Harvesting Increases Leaf and Stem Debris in Loads of Mechanically Harvested Citrus Fruit
A11 01  1    @1 SPANN (Timothy M.)
A11 02  1    @1 DANYLUK (Michelle D.)
A14 01      @1 University of Florida, Horticultural Sciences Department, Citrus Research and Education Center, 700 Experiment Station Road @2 Lake Alfred, FL 33850 @3 USA @Z 1 aut.
A14 02      @1 University of Florida, Food Science and Human Nutrition Department, Citrus Research and Education Center, 700 Experiment Station Road @2 Lake Alfred, FL 33850 @3 USA @Z 2 aut.
A20       @1 1297-1300
A21       @1 2010
A23 01      @0 ENG
A43 01      @1 INIST @2 13300 @5 354000192613540290
A44       @0 0000 @1 © 2010 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.
A45       @0 1/2 p.
A47 01  1    @0 10-0423654
A60       @1 P
A61       @0 A
A64 01  1    @0 HortScience
A66 01      @0 USA
C01 01    ENG  @0 The adoption of mechanical harvesting for processing oranges is a major objective of the Florida citrus industry. A number of issues have slowed the adoption of this new technology, including the observation that the amount of leaves, stems, and dead branches (collectively termed "debris") is greater in mechanically harvested than in hand-harvested loads of fruit. This debris increases transportation and processing costs. The objective of this research was to determine the amount and types of debris in mechanically harvested loads of sweet oranges compared with hand-harvested controls. Mechanical harvesting was found to increase the amount of debris per load of fruit by as much as 250% compared with hand-harvested fruit. This translates into ≃108 kg of debris compared with 71 kg (fresh weight) per 27 t load for mechanically harvested and hand-harvested fruit, respectively. Across harvesting method, leaves were the largest component of debris, accounting for ≃60% of total debris, small stems (less than 5 mm diameter) accounted for ≃35%, and the remaining 5% was large stems (greater than 5 mm diameter). In addition, the amount of sand on the surface of mechanically harvested fruit that was picked up from the orchard floor was found to be up to 10 times greater compared with hand-harvested controls. Engineers developing debris elimination systems for mechanical harvesting systems can use the data from this study to determine the performance requirements of their systems. The data are also useful for economic analyses of the costs of mechanical harvesting.
C02 01  X    @0 002A32
C03 01  X  FRE  @0 Récolte mécanique @5 01
C03 01  X  ENG  @0 Mechanical harvesting @5 01
C03 01  X  SPA  @0 Cosecha mecánica @5 01
C03 02  X  FRE  @0 Augmentation @5 02
C03 02  X  ENG  @0 Increase @5 02
C03 02  X  SPA  @0 Aumentación @5 02
C03 03  X  FRE  @0 Feuille végétal @5 03
C03 03  X  ENG  @0 Plant leaf @5 03
C03 03  X  SPA  @0 Hoja vegetal @5 03
C03 04  X  FRE  @0 Tige @5 04
C03 04  X  ENG  @0 Stem @5 04
C03 04  X  SPA  @0 Tallo @5 04
C03 05  X  FRE  @0 Débris @5 05
C03 05  X  ENG  @0 Debris @5 05
C03 05  X  SPA  @0 Pedazos @5 05
C03 06  X  FRE  @0 Canopée @5 06
C03 06  X  ENG  @0 Canopy(vegetation) @5 06
C03 06  X  SPA  @0 Dosel @5 06
C03 07  X  FRE  @0 Mécanisation @5 07
C03 07  X  ENG  @0 Mechanization @5 07
C03 07  X  SPA  @0 Mecanización @5 07
C03 08  X  FRE  @0 Horticulture @5 08
C03 08  X  ENG  @0 Horticulture @5 08
C03 08  X  SPA  @0 Horticultura @5 08
C03 09  X  FRE  @0 Rutaceae @2 NS @5 09
C03 09  X  ENG  @0 Rutaceae @2 NS @5 09
C03 09  X  SPA  @0 Rutaceae @2 NS @5 09
C03 10  X  FRE  @0 Citrus sinensis @2 NS @5 10
C03 10  X  ENG  @0 Citrus sinensis @2 NS @5 10
C03 10  X  SPA  @0 Citrus sinensis @2 NS @5 10
C03 11  X  FRE  @0 Agrume @5 15
C03 11  X  ENG  @0 Citrus fruit @5 15
C03 11  X  SPA  @0 Agrios @5 15
C03 12  X  FRE  @0 <<>> @4 INC @5 68
C07 01  X  FRE  @0 Dicotyledones @2 NS
C07 01  X  ENG  @0 Dicotyledones @2 NS
C07 01  X  SPA  @0 Dicotyledones @2 NS
C07 02  X  FRE  @0 Angiospermae @2 NS
C07 02  X  ENG  @0 Angiospermae @2 NS
C07 02  X  SPA  @0 Angiospermae @2 NS
C07 03  X  FRE  @0 Spermatophyta @2 NS
C07 03  X  ENG  @0 Spermatophyta @2 NS
C07 03  X  SPA  @0 Spermatophyta @2 NS
C07 04  X  FRE  @0 Arbre fruitier @5 31
C07 04  X  ENG  @0 Fruit tree @5 31
C07 04  X  SPA  @0 Arbol frutal @5 31
C07 05  X  FRE  @0 Plante fruitière @5 32
C07 05  X  ENG  @0 Fruit crop @5 32
C07 05  X  SPA  @0 Planta frutal @5 32
C07 06  X  FRE  @0 Appareil végétatif @5 33
C07 06  X  ENG  @0 Vegetative apparatus @5 33
C07 06  X  SPA  @0 Sistema vegetativo @5 33
N21       @1 277
N44 01      @1 OTO
N82       @1 OTO

Format Inist (serveur)

NO : PASCAL 10-0423654 INIST
ET : Mechanical Harvesting Increases Leaf and Stem Debris in Loads of Mechanically Harvested Citrus Fruit
AU : SPANN (Timothy M.); DANYLUK (Michelle D.)
AF : University of Florida, Horticultural Sciences Department, Citrus Research and Education Center, 700 Experiment Station Road/Lake Alfred, FL 33850/Etats-Unis (1 aut.); University of Florida, Food Science and Human Nutrition Department, Citrus Research and Education Center, 700 Experiment Station Road/Lake Alfred, FL 33850/Etats-Unis (2 aut.)
DT : Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO : HortScience; ISSN 0018-5345; Coden HJHSAR; Etats-Unis; Da. 2010; Vol. 45; No. 8; Pp. 1297-1300; Bibl. 1/2 p.
LA : Anglais
EA : The adoption of mechanical harvesting for processing oranges is a major objective of the Florida citrus industry. A number of issues have slowed the adoption of this new technology, including the observation that the amount of leaves, stems, and dead branches (collectively termed "debris") is greater in mechanically harvested than in hand-harvested loads of fruit. This debris increases transportation and processing costs. The objective of this research was to determine the amount and types of debris in mechanically harvested loads of sweet oranges compared with hand-harvested controls. Mechanical harvesting was found to increase the amount of debris per load of fruit by as much as 250% compared with hand-harvested fruit. This translates into ≃108 kg of debris compared with 71 kg (fresh weight) per 27 t load for mechanically harvested and hand-harvested fruit, respectively. Across harvesting method, leaves were the largest component of debris, accounting for ≃60% of total debris, small stems (less than 5 mm diameter) accounted for ≃35%, and the remaining 5% was large stems (greater than 5 mm diameter). In addition, the amount of sand on the surface of mechanically harvested fruit that was picked up from the orchard floor was found to be up to 10 times greater compared with hand-harvested controls. Engineers developing debris elimination systems for mechanical harvesting systems can use the data from this study to determine the performance requirements of their systems. The data are also useful for economic analyses of the costs of mechanical harvesting.
CC : 002A32
FD : Récolte mécanique; Augmentation; Feuille végétal; Tige; Débris; Canopée; Mécanisation; Horticulture; Rutaceae; Citrus sinensis; Agrume; <<>>
FG : Dicotyledones; Angiospermae; Spermatophyta; Arbre fruitier; Plante fruitière; Appareil végétatif
ED : Mechanical harvesting; Increase; Plant leaf; Stem; Debris; Canopy(vegetation); Mechanization; Horticulture; Rutaceae; Citrus sinensis; Citrus fruit
EG : Dicotyledones; Angiospermae; Spermatophyta; Fruit tree; Fruit crop; Vegetative apparatus
SD : Cosecha mecánica; Aumentación; Hoja vegetal; Tallo; Pedazos; Dosel; Mecanización; Horticultura; Rutaceae; Citrus sinensis; Agrios
LO : INIST-13300.354000192613540290
ID : 10-0423654

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:10-0423654

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Mechanical Harvesting Increases Leaf and Stem Debris in Loads of Mechanically Harvested Citrus Fruit</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Spann, Timothy M" sort="Spann, Timothy M" uniqKey="Spann T" first="Timothy M." last="Spann">Timothy M. Spann</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>University of Florida, Horticultural Sciences Department, Citrus Research and Education Center, 700 Experiment Station Road</s1>
<s2>Lake Alfred, FL 33850</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Danyluk, Michelle D" sort="Danyluk, Michelle D" uniqKey="Danyluk M" first="Michelle D." last="Danyluk">Michelle D. Danyluk</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>University of Florida, Food Science and Human Nutrition Department, Citrus Research and Education Center, 700 Experiment Station Road</s1>
<s2>Lake Alfred, FL 33850</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">10-0423654</idno>
<date when="2010">2010</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 10-0423654 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:10-0423654</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000226</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Mechanical Harvesting Increases Leaf and Stem Debris in Loads of Mechanically Harvested Citrus Fruit</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Spann, Timothy M" sort="Spann, Timothy M" uniqKey="Spann T" first="Timothy M." last="Spann">Timothy M. Spann</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>University of Florida, Horticultural Sciences Department, Citrus Research and Education Center, 700 Experiment Station Road</s1>
<s2>Lake Alfred, FL 33850</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Danyluk, Michelle D" sort="Danyluk, Michelle D" uniqKey="Danyluk M" first="Michelle D." last="Danyluk">Michelle D. Danyluk</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>University of Florida, Food Science and Human Nutrition Department, Citrus Research and Education Center, 700 Experiment Station Road</s1>
<s2>Lake Alfred, FL 33850</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">HortScience</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">HortScience</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0018-5345</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2010">2010</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<title level="j" type="main">HortScience</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">HortScience</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0018-5345</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Canopy(vegetation)</term>
<term>Citrus fruit</term>
<term>Citrus sinensis</term>
<term>Debris</term>
<term>Horticulture</term>
<term>Increase</term>
<term>Mechanical harvesting</term>
<term>Mechanization</term>
<term>Plant leaf</term>
<term>Rutaceae</term>
<term>Stem</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Récolte mécanique</term>
<term>Augmentation</term>
<term>Feuille végétal</term>
<term>Tige</term>
<term>Débris</term>
<term>Canopée</term>
<term>Mécanisation</term>
<term>Horticulture</term>
<term>Rutaceae</term>
<term>Citrus sinensis</term>
<term>Agrume</term>
<term><<>></term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The adoption of mechanical harvesting for processing oranges is a major objective of the Florida citrus industry. A number of issues have slowed the adoption of this new technology, including the observation that the amount of leaves, stems, and dead branches (collectively termed "debris") is greater in mechanically harvested than in hand-harvested loads of fruit. This debris increases transportation and processing costs. The objective of this research was to determine the amount and types of debris in mechanically harvested loads of sweet oranges compared with hand-harvested controls. Mechanical harvesting was found to increase the amount of debris per load of fruit by as much as 250% compared with hand-harvested fruit. This translates into ≃108 kg of debris compared with 71 kg (fresh weight) per 27 t load for mechanically harvested and hand-harvested fruit, respectively. Across harvesting method, leaves were the largest component of debris, accounting for ≃60% of total debris, small stems (less than 5 mm diameter) accounted for ≃35%, and the remaining 5% was large stems (greater than 5 mm diameter). In addition, the amount of sand on the surface of mechanically harvested fruit that was picked up from the orchard floor was found to be up to 10 times greater compared with hand-harvested controls. Engineers developing debris elimination systems for mechanical harvesting systems can use the data from this study to determine the performance requirements of their systems. The data are also useful for economic analyses of the costs of mechanical harvesting.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist>
<standard h6="B">
<pA>
<fA01 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>0018-5345</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01">
<s0>HJHSAR</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1">
<s0>HortScience</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05>
<s2>45</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06>
<s2>8</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Mechanical Harvesting Increases Leaf and Stem Debris in Loads of Mechanically Harvested Citrus Fruit</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>SPANN (Timothy M.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1">
<s1>DANYLUK (Michelle D.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01">
<s1>University of Florida, Horticultural Sciences Department, Citrus Research and Education Center, 700 Experiment Station Road</s1>
<s2>Lake Alfred, FL 33850</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02">
<s1>University of Florida, Food Science and Human Nutrition Department, Citrus Research and Education Center, 700 Experiment Station Road</s1>
<s2>Lake Alfred, FL 33850</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20>
<s1>1297-1300</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21>
<s1>2010</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01">
<s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01">
<s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>13300</s2>
<s5>354000192613540290</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44>
<s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2010 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45>
<s0>1/2 p.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>10-0423654</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60>
<s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61>
<s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>HortScience</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01">
<s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG">
<s0>The adoption of mechanical harvesting for processing oranges is a major objective of the Florida citrus industry. A number of issues have slowed the adoption of this new technology, including the observation that the amount of leaves, stems, and dead branches (collectively termed "debris") is greater in mechanically harvested than in hand-harvested loads of fruit. This debris increases transportation and processing costs. The objective of this research was to determine the amount and types of debris in mechanically harvested loads of sweet oranges compared with hand-harvested controls. Mechanical harvesting was found to increase the amount of debris per load of fruit by as much as 250% compared with hand-harvested fruit. This translates into ≃108 kg of debris compared with 71 kg (fresh weight) per 27 t load for mechanically harvested and hand-harvested fruit, respectively. Across harvesting method, leaves were the largest component of debris, accounting for ≃60% of total debris, small stems (less than 5 mm diameter) accounted for ≃35%, and the remaining 5% was large stems (greater than 5 mm diameter). In addition, the amount of sand on the surface of mechanically harvested fruit that was picked up from the orchard floor was found to be up to 10 times greater compared with hand-harvested controls. Engineers developing debris elimination systems for mechanical harvesting systems can use the data from this study to determine the performance requirements of their systems. The data are also useful for economic analyses of the costs of mechanical harvesting.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X">
<s0>002A32</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Récolte mécanique</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Mechanical harvesting</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Cosecha mecánica</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Augmentation</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Increase</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Aumentación</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Feuille végétal</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Plant leaf</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Hoja vegetal</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Tige</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Stem</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Tallo</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Débris</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Debris</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Pedazos</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Canopée</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Canopy(vegetation)</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Dosel</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Mécanisation</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Mechanization</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Mecanización</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Horticulture</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Horticulture</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Horticultura</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Rutaceae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Rutaceae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Rutaceae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Citrus sinensis</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Citrus sinensis</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Citrus sinensis</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Agrume</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Citrus fruit</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Agrios</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0><<>></s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>68</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Dicotyledones</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Dicotyledones</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Dicotyledones</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Angiospermae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Angiospermae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Angiospermae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Spermatophyta</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Spermatophyta</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Spermatophyta</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Arbre fruitier</s0>
<s5>31</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Fruit tree</s0>
<s5>31</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Arbol frutal</s0>
<s5>31</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Plante fruitière</s0>
<s5>32</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Fruit crop</s0>
<s5>32</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Planta frutal</s0>
<s5>32</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Appareil végétatif</s0>
<s5>33</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Vegetative apparatus</s0>
<s5>33</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Sistema vegetativo</s0>
<s5>33</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21>
<s1>277</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01">
<s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82>
<s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server>
<NO>PASCAL 10-0423654 INIST</NO>
<ET>Mechanical Harvesting Increases Leaf and Stem Debris in Loads of Mechanically Harvested Citrus Fruit</ET>
<AU>SPANN (Timothy M.); DANYLUK (Michelle D.)</AU>
<AF>University of Florida, Horticultural Sciences Department, Citrus Research and Education Center, 700 Experiment Station Road/Lake Alfred, FL 33850/Etats-Unis (1 aut.); University of Florida, Food Science and Human Nutrition Department, Citrus Research and Education Center, 700 Experiment Station Road/Lake Alfred, FL 33850/Etats-Unis (2 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>HortScience; ISSN 0018-5345; Coden HJHSAR; Etats-Unis; Da. 2010; Vol. 45; No. 8; Pp. 1297-1300; Bibl. 1/2 p.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>The adoption of mechanical harvesting for processing oranges is a major objective of the Florida citrus industry. A number of issues have slowed the adoption of this new technology, including the observation that the amount of leaves, stems, and dead branches (collectively termed "debris") is greater in mechanically harvested than in hand-harvested loads of fruit. This debris increases transportation and processing costs. The objective of this research was to determine the amount and types of debris in mechanically harvested loads of sweet oranges compared with hand-harvested controls. Mechanical harvesting was found to increase the amount of debris per load of fruit by as much as 250% compared with hand-harvested fruit. This translates into ≃108 kg of debris compared with 71 kg (fresh weight) per 27 t load for mechanically harvested and hand-harvested fruit, respectively. Across harvesting method, leaves were the largest component of debris, accounting for ≃60% of total debris, small stems (less than 5 mm diameter) accounted for ≃35%, and the remaining 5% was large stems (greater than 5 mm diameter). In addition, the amount of sand on the surface of mechanically harvested fruit that was picked up from the orchard floor was found to be up to 10 times greater compared with hand-harvested controls. Engineers developing debris elimination systems for mechanical harvesting systems can use the data from this study to determine the performance requirements of their systems. The data are also useful for economic analyses of the costs of mechanical harvesting.</EA>
<CC>002A32</CC>
<FD>Récolte mécanique; Augmentation; Feuille végétal; Tige; Débris; Canopée; Mécanisation; Horticulture; Rutaceae; Citrus sinensis; Agrume; <<>></FD>
<FG>Dicotyledones; Angiospermae; Spermatophyta; Arbre fruitier; Plante fruitière; Appareil végétatif</FG>
<ED>Mechanical harvesting; Increase; Plant leaf; Stem; Debris; Canopy(vegetation); Mechanization; Horticulture; Rutaceae; Citrus sinensis; Citrus fruit</ED>
<EG>Dicotyledones; Angiospermae; Spermatophyta; Fruit tree; Fruit crop; Vegetative apparatus</EG>
<SD>Cosecha mecánica; Aumentación; Hoja vegetal; Tallo; Pedazos; Dosel; Mecanización; Horticultura; Rutaceae; Citrus sinensis; Agrios</SD>
<LO>INIST-13300.354000192613540290</LO>
<ID>10-0423654</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Bois/explor/OrangerV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000226 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000226 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Bois
   |area=    OrangerV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:10-0423654
   |texte=   Mechanical Harvesting Increases Leaf and Stem Debris in Loads of Mechanically Harvested Citrus Fruit
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.25.
Data generation: Sat Dec 3 17:11:04 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 18:18:32 2024