MycorrhizaeV1, Main, Corpus, bibRecord, 000E27

Distinctive Feature of Microbial Communities and Bacterial Functional Profiles in Tricholoma matsutake Dominant Soil.

Identifieur interne : 000E27 ( Main/Corpus ); précédent : 000E26; suivant : 000E28

Distinctive Feature of Microbial Communities and Bacterial Functional Profiles in Tricholoma matsutake Dominant Soil.

Auteurs : Seung-Yoon Oh ; Jonathan J. Fong ; Myung Soo Park ; Young Woon Lim

Source :

PloS one [ 1932-6203 ] ; 2016.

RBID : pubmed:27977803

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Bacteria (genetics), Bacteria (isolation & purification), Mycorrhizae (genetics), Mycorrhizae (isolation & purification), Sequence Analysis, DNA (MeSH), Soil Microbiology (MeSH), Tricholoma (physiology).
MESH :
- genetics : Bacteria, Mycorrhizae.
- isolation & purification : Bacteria, Mycorrhizae.
- physiology : Tricholoma.
- Sequence Analysis, DNA, Soil Microbiology.

Abstract

Tricholoma matsutake, the pine mushroom, is a valuable forest product with high economic value in Asia, and plays an important ecological role as an ectomycorrhizal fungus. Around the host tree, T. matsutake hyphae generate a distinctive soil aggregating environment called a fairy ring, where fruiting bodies form. Because T. matsutake hyphae dominate the soil near the fairy ring, this species has the potential to influence the microbial community. To explore the influence of T. matsutake on the microbial communities, we compared the microbial community and predicted bacterial function between two different soil types-T. matsutake dominant and T. matsutake minor. DNA sequence analyses showed that fungal and bacterial diversity were lower in the T. matsutake dominant soil compared to T. matsutake minor soil. Some microbial taxa were significantly more common in the T. matsutake dominant soil across geographic locations, many of which were previously identified as mycophillic or mycorrhiza helper bacteria. Between the two soil types, the predicted bacterial functional profiles (using PICRUSt) had significantly distinct KEGG modules. Modules for amino acid uptake, carbohydrate metabolism, and the type III secretion system were higher in the T. matsutake dominant soil than in the T. matsutake minor soil. Overall, similar microbial diversity, community structure, and bacterial functional profiles of the T. matsutake dominant soil across geographic locations suggest that T. matsutake may generate a dominance effect.

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168573
PubMed: 27977803
PubMed Central: PMC5158061

Links to Exploration step

pubmed:27977803

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Distinctive Feature of Microbial Communities and Bacterial Functional Profiles in Tricholoma matsutake Dominant Soil.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Oh, Seung Yoon" sort="Oh, Seung Yoon" uniqKey="Oh S" first="Seung-Yoon" last="Oh">Seung-Yoon Oh</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>School of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Fong, Jonathan J" sort="Fong, Jonathan J" uniqKey="Fong J" first="Jonathan J" last="Fong">Jonathan J. Fong</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Science Unit, Lingnan University, Tuen Mun, New Territories, Hong Kong.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Park, Myung Soo" sort="Park, Myung Soo" uniqKey="Park M" first="Myung Soo" last="Park">Myung Soo Park</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>School of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Lim, Young Woon" sort="Lim, Young Woon" uniqKey="Lim Y" first="Young Woon" last="Lim">Young Woon Lim</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>School of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2016">2016</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:27977803</idno>
<idno type="pmid">27977803</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0168573</idno>
<idno type="pmc">PMC5158061</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000E27</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000E27</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Distinctive Feature of Microbial Communities and Bacterial Functional Profiles in Tricholoma matsutake Dominant Soil.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Oh, Seung Yoon" sort="Oh, Seung Yoon" uniqKey="Oh S" first="Seung-Yoon" last="Oh">Seung-Yoon Oh</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>School of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Fong, Jonathan J" sort="Fong, Jonathan J" uniqKey="Fong J" first="Jonathan J" last="Fong">Jonathan J. Fong</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Science Unit, Lingnan University, Tuen Mun, New Territories, Hong Kong.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Park, Myung Soo" sort="Park, Myung Soo" uniqKey="Park M" first="Myung Soo" last="Park">Myung Soo Park</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>School of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Lim, Young Woon" sort="Lim, Young Woon" uniqKey="Lim Y" first="Young Woon" last="Lim">Young Woon Lim</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>School of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">PloS one</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1932-6203</idno>
<imprint><date when="2016" type="published">2016</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Bacteria (genetics)</term>
<term>Bacteria (isolation & purification)</term>
<term>Mycorrhizae (genetics)</term>
<term>Mycorrhizae (isolation & purification)</term>
<term>Sequence Analysis, DNA (MeSH)</term>
<term>Soil Microbiology (MeSH)</term>
<term>Tricholoma (physiology)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="genetics" xml:lang="en"><term>Bacteria</term>
<term>Mycorrhizae</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="isolation & purification" xml:lang="en"><term>Bacteria</term>
<term>Mycorrhizae</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Tricholoma</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Sequence Analysis, DNA</term>
<term>Soil Microbiology</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Tricholoma matsutake, the pine mushroom, is a valuable forest product with high economic value in Asia, and plays an important ecological role as an ectomycorrhizal fungus. Around the host tree, T. matsutake hyphae generate a distinctive soil aggregating environment called a fairy ring, where fruiting bodies form. Because T. matsutake hyphae dominate the soil near the fairy ring, this species has the potential to influence the microbial community. To explore the influence of T. matsutake on the microbial communities, we compared the microbial community and predicted bacterial function between two different soil types-T. matsutake dominant and T. matsutake minor. DNA sequence analyses showed that fungal and bacterial diversity were lower in the T. matsutake dominant soil compared to T. matsutake minor soil. Some microbial taxa were significantly more common in the T. matsutake dominant soil across geographic locations, many of which were previously identified as mycophillic or mycorrhiza helper bacteria. Between the two soil types, the predicted bacterial functional profiles (using PICRUSt) had significantly distinct KEGG modules. Modules for amino acid uptake, carbohydrate metabolism, and the type III secretion system were higher in the T. matsutake dominant soil than in the T. matsutake minor soil. Overall, similar microbial diversity, community structure, and bacterial functional profiles of the T. matsutake dominant soil across geographic locations suggest that T. matsutake may generate a dominance effect.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">27977803</PMID>
<DateCompleted><Year>2017</Year>
<Month>07</Month>
<Day>05</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised><Year>2018</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>13</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Electronic-eCollection"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1932-6203</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>11</Volume>
<Issue>12</Issue>
<PubDate><Year>2016</Year>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>PloS one</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>PLoS One</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Distinctive Feature of Microbial Communities and Bacterial Functional Profiles in Tricholoma matsutake Dominant Soil.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>e0168573</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1371/journal.pone.0168573</ELocationID>
<Abstract><AbstractText>Tricholoma matsutake, the pine mushroom, is a valuable forest product with high economic value in Asia, and plays an important ecological role as an ectomycorrhizal fungus. Around the host tree, T. matsutake hyphae generate a distinctive soil aggregating environment called a fairy ring, where fruiting bodies form. Because T. matsutake hyphae dominate the soil near the fairy ring, this species has the potential to influence the microbial community. To explore the influence of T. matsutake on the microbial communities, we compared the microbial community and predicted bacterial function between two different soil types-T. matsutake dominant and T. matsutake minor. DNA sequence analyses showed that fungal and bacterial diversity were lower in the T. matsutake dominant soil compared to T. matsutake minor soil. Some microbial taxa were significantly more common in the T. matsutake dominant soil across geographic locations, many of which were previously identified as mycophillic or mycorrhiza helper bacteria. Between the two soil types, the predicted bacterial functional profiles (using PICRUSt) had significantly distinct KEGG modules. Modules for amino acid uptake, carbohydrate metabolism, and the type III secretion system were higher in the T. matsutake dominant soil than in the T. matsutake minor soil. Overall, similar microbial diversity, community structure, and bacterial functional profiles of the T. matsutake dominant soil across geographic locations suggest that T. matsutake may generate a dominance effect.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Oh</LastName>
<ForeName>Seung-Yoon</ForeName>
<Initials>SY</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>School of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Fong</LastName>
<ForeName>Jonathan J</ForeName>
<Initials>JJ</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Science Unit, Lingnan University, Tuen Mun, New Territories, Hong Kong.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Park</LastName>
<ForeName>Myung Soo</ForeName>
<Initials>MS</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>School of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Lim</LastName>
<ForeName>Young Woon</ForeName>
<Initials>YW</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>School of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2016</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>15</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country>
<MedlineTA>PLoS One</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>101285081</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>1932-6203</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001419" MajorTopicYN="N">Bacteria</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="N">genetics</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000302" MajorTopicYN="N">isolation & purification</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D038821" MajorTopicYN="N">Mycorrhizae</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="N">genetics</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000302" MajorTopicYN="N">isolation & purification</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017422" MajorTopicYN="N">Sequence Analysis, DNA</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012988" MajorTopicYN="Y">Soil Microbiology</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D055439" MajorTopicYN="N">Tricholoma</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
<CoiStatement>The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.</CoiStatement>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2016</Year>
<Month>09</Month>
<Day>13</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2016</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>03</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2016</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>16</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2016</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>16</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2017</Year>
<Month>7</Month>
<Day>6</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>epublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">27977803</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0168573</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pii">PONE-D-16-36725</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC5158061</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
<ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>Front Microbiol. 2014 Nov 11;5:598</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25426111</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>ISME J. 2008 Aug;2(8):887-900</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18421258</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Can J Microbiol. 2015 Jun;61(6):447-50</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25803209</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Jul;72(7):5069-72</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16820507</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2016 Oct;109 (10 ):1353-65</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">27411813</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Microb Ecol. 2015 May;69(4):914-21</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25687126</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Dec;77(24):8523-31</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21984247</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>PLoS One. 2010 Mar 10;5(3):e9490</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20224823</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2005 Jan;165(1):317-28</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15720643</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>ISME J. 2012 Feb;6(2):343-51</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21900968</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Environ Microbiol Rep. 2011 Apr;3(2):203-10</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23761252</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Bioinformatics. 2010 Jan 1;26(1):139-40</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19910308</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2006;171(4):825-36</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16918553</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Cell Host Microbe. 2007 Nov 15;2(5):291-4</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18005750</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Environ Microbiol. 2011 Mar;13(3):819-30</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21176055</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Folia Microbiol (Praha). 1967;12(6):515-23</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">6080528</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2007;176(1):22-36</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17803639</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>J Appl Microbiol. 2014 Sep;117(3):699-710</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24922184</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2013 Mar;83(3):596-606</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23013423</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Can J Microbiol. 2006 Aug;52(8):769-78</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16917536</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015 Jan;81(2):783-93</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25398868</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Methods Enzymol. 2013;531:251-67</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24060125</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015 May 15;81(10):3460-70</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25769823</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Nat Methods. 2010 Sep;7(9):668-9</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20805793</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2015 Apr;91(4):null</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25764467</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2011 Mar;75(3):457-67</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21204867</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2002 Mar 1;39(3):219-27</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19709201</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>J Appl Microbiol. 2015 Apr;118(4):890-900</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25619404</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2014 Sep;89(3):516-26</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24807742</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>J Bacteriol. 1991 Jan;173(2):697-703</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">1987160</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2008;177(4):859-76</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18086226</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Apr;78(8):3020-4</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22307291</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Dec 26;109(52):21390-5</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23236140</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Genome Res. 2011 Mar;21(3):494-504</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21212162</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007 Oct;57(Pt 10):2259-61</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17911292</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997 Jan;63(1):139-44</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16535478</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Aug;73(16):5261-7</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17586664</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Mar;72(3):1719-28</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16517615</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>J Microbiol. 2012 Apr;50(2):199-206</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22538647</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Bioinformatics. 2010 Jan 15;26(2):266-7</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19914921</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Nat Methods. 2010 May;7(5):335-6</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20383131</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>PLoS One. 2013 Apr 22;8(4):e61217</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23630581</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013 Oct 28;23(10):1347-56</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23949332</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2010 Feb;71(2):169-85</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20002182</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2007;175(4):743-55</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17688589</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Trends Biotechnol. 2003 Oct;21(10):433-8</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">14512229</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2015 Nov;91(11):null</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26432804</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Nat Biotechnol. 2013 Sep;31(9):814-21</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23975157</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Front Plant Sci. 2014 Jun 16;5:209</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24982662</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Bioinformatics. 2010 Oct 1;26(19):2460-1</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20709691</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Environ Microbiol. 2014 Sep;16(9):2831-47</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24118660</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>ISME J. 2015 Jul;9(7):1579-92</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25535937</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Nat Methods. 2013 Dec;10(12):1200-2</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24076764</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Mol Ecol. 2013 Nov;22(21):5271-7</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24112409</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Mol Ecol. 1993 Apr;2(2):113-8</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">8180733</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2009 Oct;184(2):449-56</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19703112</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jan;42(Database issue):D199-205</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24214961</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Environ Microbiol. 2009 Feb;11(2):300-12</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19196267</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Sci Rep. 2013 Dec 11;3:3471</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24326907</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
</ReferenceList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/MycorrhizaeV1/Data/Main/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000E27 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000E27 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Bois
   |area=    MycorrhizaeV1
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:27977803
   |texte=   Distinctive Feature of Microbial Communities and Bacterial Functional Profiles in Tricholoma matsutake Dominant Soil.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:27977803" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a MycorrhizaeV1

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37.
Data generation: Wed Nov 18 15:34:48 2020. Site generation: Wed Nov 18 15:41:10 2020

	Serveur d'exploration sur la mycorhize
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur la mycorhize

Distinctive Feature of Microbial Communities and Bacterial Functional Profiles in Tricholoma matsutake Dominant Soil.

Distinctive Feature of Microbial Communities and Bacterial Functional Profiles in Tricholoma matsutake Dominant Soil.

Source :

English descriptors

Abstract

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

Pour générer des pages wiki