Colonization of recent coniferous versus deciduous forest stands by vascular plants at the local scale
Identifieur interne : 000976 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000975; suivant : 000977Colonization of recent coniferous versus deciduous forest stands by vascular plants at the local scale
Auteurs : Monika Wulf ; Thilo HeinkenSource :
- Applied Vegetation Science [ 1402-2001 ] ; 2008-08.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Questions: 1. Are there differences among species in their preference for coniferous vs. deciduous forest? 2. Are tree and shrub species better colonizers of recent forest stands than herbaceous species? 3. Do colonization patterns of plant species groups depend on tree species composition?
Url:
DOI: 10.3170/2008-7-18432
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:945ECE6CDCFE0549E1B70EC8B7FEA71E33B91224Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Colonization of recent coniferous versus deciduous forest stands by vascular plants at the local scale</title><author><name sortKey="Wulf, Monika" sort="Wulf, Monika" uniqKey="Wulf M" first="Monika" last="Wulf">Monika Wulf</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Research (ZALF e.V.), Institute of Land Use Systems and Landscape Ecology, Eberswalder Straße 84, DE‐15374 Müncheberg, Germany;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: mwulf@zalf.de</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Heinken, Thilo" sort="Heinken, Thilo" uniqKey="Heinken T" first="Thilo" last="Heinken">Thilo Heinken</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, Community Ecology/Systematic Botany, University of Potsdam, Maulbeerallee 1, DE‐14469 Potsdam, Germany; E‐mail heinken@uni‐potsdam.de;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:945ECE6CDCFE0549E1B70EC8B7FEA71E33B91224</idno><date when="2008" year="2008">2008</date><idno type="doi">10.3170/2008-7-18432</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/945ECE6CDCFE0549E1B70EC8B7FEA71E33B91224/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000976</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000976</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Colonization of recent coniferous versus deciduous forest stands by vascular plants at the local scale</title><author><name sortKey="Wulf, Monika" sort="Wulf, Monika" uniqKey="Wulf M" first="Monika" last="Wulf">Monika Wulf</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Research (ZALF e.V.), Institute of Land Use Systems and Landscape Ecology, Eberswalder Straße 84, DE‐15374 Müncheberg, Germany;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: mwulf@zalf.de</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Heinken, Thilo" sort="Heinken, Thilo" uniqKey="Heinken T" first="Thilo" last="Heinken">Thilo Heinken</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, Community Ecology/Systematic Botany, University of Potsdam, Maulbeerallee 1, DE‐14469 Potsdam, Germany; E‐mail heinken@uni‐potsdam.de;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Applied Vegetation Science</title><idno type="ISSN">1402-2001</idno><idno type="eISSN">1654-109X</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2008-08">2008-08</date><biblScope unit="volume">11</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="307">307</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="316">316</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1402-2001</idno></series><idno type="istex">945ECE6CDCFE0549E1B70EC8B7FEA71E33B91224</idno><idno type="DOI">10.3170/2008-7-18432</idno><idno type="ArticleID">AVSC447</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1402-2001</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Clonal growth</term><term>Diaspore weight</term><term>Dispersal potential</term><term>Forest specialist</term><term>Generalist emergent group</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Questions: 1. Are there differences among species in their preference for coniferous vs. deciduous forest? 2. Are tree and shrub species better colonizers of recent forest stands than herbaceous species? 3. Do colonization patterns of plant species groups depend on tree species composition?</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Monika Wulf</name><affiliations><json:string>Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Research (ZALF e.V.), Institute of Land Use Systems and Landscape Ecology, Eberswalder Straße 84, DE‐15374 Müncheberg, Germany;</json:string><json:string>E-mail: mwulf@zalf.de</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Thilo Heinken</name><affiliations><json:string>Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, Community Ecology/Systematic Botany, University of Potsdam, Maulbeerallee 1, DE‐14469 Potsdam, Germany; E‐mail heinken@uni‐potsdam.de;</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Clonal growth</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Diaspore weight</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Dispersal potential</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Forest specialist</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Generalist emergent group</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>AVSC447</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><qualityIndicators><score>6.516</score><pdfVersion>1.5</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>595.3 x 779.55 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>291</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>5240</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>35004</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>10</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>43</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Colonization of recent coniferous versus deciduous forest stands by vascular plants at the local scale</title><refBibs><json:item><host><author></author><title>Anon.2003. SPSS Base 12.0. SPSS, Chicago , IL , US .</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Anon.2006. World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2006.World Soil Resources Reports No. 103. FAO, Rome , IT . (see link:ftp://ftp.fao.org/agl/agll/docs/wsrr103e.pdf).</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L. Augusto</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. Bonnaud</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Ranger</name></json:item></author><host><volume>105</volume><pages><last>78</last><first>67</first></pages><author></author><title>Forest Ecology and Management</title></host><title>Impact of tree species on forest soil acidification</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>B. Bossuyt</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Hermy</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Deckers</name></json:item></author><host><volume>87</volume><pages><last>638</last><first>628</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Ecology</title></host><title>Migration of herbaceous plant species across ancient‐recent forest ecotones in central Belgium</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. Brunet</name></json:item><json:item><name>G. von Oheimb</name></json:item></author><host><volume>86</volume><pages><last>438</last><first>429</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Ecology</title></host><title>Migration of vascular plants to secondary woodlands in southern Sweden</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Z. Dzwonko</name></json:item></author><host><volume>70</volume><pages><last>77</last><first>71</first></pages><author></author><title>Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae</title></host><title>Migration of vascular plant species to a recent wood adjoining ancient woodland</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. Ehrlén</name></json:item><json:item><name>O. Eriksson</name></json:item></author><host><volume>66</volume><pages><last>113</last><first>107</first></pages><author></author><title>Oikos</title></host><title>Toxicity ‐ nonadaptive trait</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Ellenberg, H. 1988. Vegetation ecology of Central Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge , UK .</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>O. Eriksson</name></json:item></author><host><volume>190</volume><pages><last>70</last><first>65</first></pages><author></author><title>Flora</title></host><title>Seedling recruitment in deciduous forest herbs: the effects of litter, soil chemistry and seed bank</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. Ewald</name></json:item></author><host><volume>3</volume><pages><last>134</last><first>123</first></pages><author></author><title>Applied Vegetation Science</title></host><title>The influence of coniferous canopies on understory vegetation and soils in mountain forests of the northern calcareous Alps</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>K. M. Flinn</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Vellend</name></json:item></author><host><volume>3</volume><pages><last>250</last><first>243</first></pages><author></author><title>Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment</title></host><title>Recovery of forest plant communities in post‐agricultural landscapes</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>B. J. Graae</name></json:item></author><host><volume>11</volume><pages><last>892</last><first>881</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Vegetation Science</title></host><title>The effect of landscape fragmentation and forest continuity on forest floor species in two regions of Denmark</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>T. Heinken</name></json:item><json:item><name>D. Raudnitschka</name></json:item></author><host><volume>121</volume><pages><last>194</last><first>179</first></pages><author></author><title>Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt</title></host><title>Do wild ungulates contribute to the dispersal of vascular plants in Central European forests by epizoochory? A case study in NE Germany</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>T. Heinken</name></json:item><json:item><name>H. Hanspach</name></json:item><json:item><name>F. Schaumann</name></json:item></author><host><volume>34</volume><pages><last>259</last><first>237</first></pages><author></author><title>Hercynia</title></host><title>Welche Rolle spielt die endozoochore Ausbreitung von Pflanzen durch wildlebende Säugetiere? Untersuchungen in zwei brandenburgischen Waldgebieten</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>B. Hérault</name></json:item><json:item><name>O. Honnay</name></json:item><json:item><name>D. Thoen</name></json:item></author><host><volume>42</volume><pages><last>545</last><first>536</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Applied Ecology</title></host><title>Evaluation of the ecological restoration potential of plant communities in Norway spruce plantations using a life‐trait based approach</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Hermy</name></json:item><json:item><name>H. Stieperaere</name></json:item></author><host><volume>44</volume><pages><last>49</last><first>43</first></pages><author></author><title>Vegetatio</title></host><title>An indirect gradient analysis of the ecological relationship between ancient and recent riverine woodlands to the south of Bruges (Flanders, Belgium)</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Hermy</name></json:item><json:item><name>O. Honnay</name></json:item><json:item><name>L. Firbank</name></json:item><json:item><name>C. Grashof‐Bokdam</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. E. Lawesson</name></json:item></author><host><volume>91</volume><pages><last>22</last><first>9</first></pages><author></author><title>Biological Conservation</title></host><title>An ecological comparison between ancient and other forest plant species of Europe, and the implications for forest conservation</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G. Hofmann</name></json:item></author><host><volume>13</volume><pages><last>664</last><first>641</first></pages><author></author><title>Archiv für Forstwesen</title></host><title>Kiefernforstgesellschaften und natürliche Kiefernwälder im östlichen Brandenburg. I. Kiefernforstgesellschaften</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G. Hofmann</name></json:item><json:item><name>U. Pommer</name></json:item></author><host><volume>22</volume><pages><last>1215</last><first>1211</first></pages><author></author><title>AFZ-Der Wald</title></host><title>Das natürliche Waldbild Brandenburgs</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>O. Honnay</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Hermy</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. Coppin</name></json:item></author><host><volume>115</volume><pages><last>170</last><first>157</first></pages><author></author><title>Forest Ecology and Management</title></host><title>Impact of habitat quality on forest plant species colonization</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L. Klimeš</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Klimešová</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. Hendriks</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. van Groenendael</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>29</last><first>1</first></pages><author></author><title>The ecology and evolution of clonal plants</title></host><title>Clonal plant architecture: a comparative analysis of form and function</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>S. Klotz</name></json:item><json:item><name>I. Kühn</name></json:item><json:item><name>W. Durka</name></json:item></author><host><volume>38</volume><pages><last>334</last><first>1</first></pages><author></author><title>Schriftenreihe für Vegetationskunde</title></host><title>BIOLFLOR ‐ Eine Datenbank mit biologisch‐ökologischen Merkmalen zur Flora von Deutschland</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. Kollmann</name></json:item></author><host><volume>9</volume><pages><last>212</last><first>1</first></pages><author></author><title>Veröffentlichungen des Projektes Angewandte Ökologie</title></host><title>Ausbreitungsökologie endozoochorer Gehölzarten</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>A. Mather</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>19</last><first>11</first></pages><author></author><title>NEWFOR ‐ New forests for Europe: Afforestation at the turn of the century</title></host><title>Afforestation: Progress, trends and policies</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>P. Müller‐Schneider</name></json:item></author><host><volume>85</volume><pages><last>263</last><first>1</first></pages><author></author><title>Veröffentlichungen des Geobotanischen Institutes der Eidgenossischen Technischen Hochschule Stiftung Rübel</title></host><title>Verbreitungsbiologie der Blütenpflanzen Graubündens</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>T. Nagaike</name></json:item><json:item><name>T. Kamitani</name></json:item><json:item><name>T. Nakashizuka</name></json:item></author><host><volume>35</volume><pages><last>2840</last><first>2832</first></pages><author></author><title>Canadian Journal of Forest Research</title></host><title>Effects of different forest management systems on plant species diversity in a Fagus crenata forested landscape of central Japan</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. D. Nyland</name></json:item></author><host><volume>172</volume><pages><last>300</last><first>291</first></pages><author></author><title>Forest Ecology and Management</title></host><title>Even‐ to uneven‐aged: the challenges of conversion</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Peterken, G. F. 1993. Woodland conservation and management. 2nd. ed.Chapman & Hall, London , UK .</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>F. Schaumann</name></json:item><json:item><name>T. Heinken</name></json:item></author><host><volume>197</volume><pages><last>378</last><first>370</first></pages><author></author><title>Flora</title></host><title>Endozoochorous seed dispersal by martens (Martes foina, Martes martes) in two woodland habitats</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Schmidt</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Ewald</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. Fischer</name></json:item><json:item><name>G. von Oheimb</name></json:item><json:item><name>W. U. Kriebitzsch</name></json:item><json:item><name>H. Ellenberg</name></json:item><json:item><name>W. Schmidt</name></json:item></author><host><volume>212</volume><pages><last>34</last><first>1</first></pages><author></author><title>Mitteilungen der Bundesforschungsanstalt für Forst-und Holzwirtschaft</title></host><title>Liste der in Deutschland typischen Waldgefäßpflanzen</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Schmidt</name></json:item><json:item><name>K. Sommer</name></json:item><json:item><name>W. U. Kriebitzsch</name></json:item><json:item><name>H. Ellenberg</name></json:item><json:item><name>G. von Oheimb</name></json:item></author><host><volume>123</volume><pages><last>176</last><first>167</first></pages><author></author><title>European Journal of Forest Research</title></host><title>Dispersal of vascular plants by game in Northern Germany. Part I: Roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) and Wild Boar (Sus scrofa)</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>H. Spiecker</name></json:item></author><host><volume>67</volume><pages><last>65</last><first>55</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Environmental Management</title></host><title>Silvicultural management in maintaining biodiversity and resistance of forests in Europe‐temperate zone</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. Stöcklin</name></json:item></author><host><volume>102</volume><pages><last>21</last><first>3</first></pages><author></author><title>Botanica Helvetica</title></host><title>Umwelt, Morphologie und Wachstum klonaler Pflanzen</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C. Sydes</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. P. Grime</name></json:item></author><host><volume>69</volume><pages><last>248</last><first>237</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Ecology</title></host><title>Effects of tree leaf litter on herbaceous vegetation in deciduous woodland. I. Field investigations</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>O. Tackenberg</name></json:item></author><host><volume>347</volume><pages><last>138</last><first>1</first></pages><author></author><title>Dissertationes Botanicae</title></host><title>Methoden zur Bewertung gradueller Unterschiede des Ausbreitungspotentials von Pflanzenarten</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>E. Utsugi</name></json:item><json:item><name>H. Kanno</name></json:item><json:item><name>N. Ueno</name></json:item></author><host><volume>237</volume><pages><last>28</last><first>15</first></pages><author></author><title>Forest Ecology and Management</title></host><title>Hardwood recruitment into conifer plantations in Japan: Effects of thinning and distance from neighbouring hardwood forests</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>K. Verheyen</name></json:item><json:item><name>O. Honnay</name></json:item><json:item><name>G. Motzkin</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Hermy</name></json:item><json:item><name>D. R. Foster</name></json:item></author><host><volume>91</volume><pages><last>577</last><first>563</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Ecology</title></host><title>Response of forest plant species to land‐use change: a life‐history trait‐based approach</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G. von Oheimb</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Schmidt</name></json:item><json:item><name>W. U. Kriebitzsch</name></json:item><json:item><name>H. Ellenberg</name></json:item></author><host><volume>124</volume><pages><last>65</last><first>55</first></pages><author></author><title>European Journal of Forest Research</title></host><title>Dispersal of vascular plants by game in Northern Germany. Part II: Red deer (Cervus elaphus)</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Wisskirchen, R. & Haeupler, H. 1998. Standardliste der Farnund Blütenpflanzen Deutschlands. Ulmer, Stuttgart , DE .</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Wulf</name></json:item></author><host><volume>67</volume><pages><last>25</last><first>15</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Environmental Management</title></host><title>Forest policy in the EU and its influence on the plant diversity of woodlands</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Wulf</name></json:item></author><host><volume>195</volume><pages><last>204</last><first>191</first></pages><author></author><title>Forest Ecology and Management</title></host><title>Species richness of afforestations with different former use and habitat continuity</title></json:item></refBibs><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>11</volume><publisherId><json:string>AVSC</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>10</total><last>316</last><first>307</first></pages><issn><json:string>1402-2001</json:string></issn><issue>3</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1654-109X</json:string></eissn><title>Applied Vegetation Science</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1654-109X</json:string></doi></host><categories><wos><json:string>science</json:string><json:string>plant sciences</json:string><json:string>forestry</json:string><json:string>ecology</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>natural sciences</json:string><json:string>biology</json:string><json:string>ecology</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>2008</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2008</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.3170/2008-7-18432</json:string></doi><id>945ECE6CDCFE0549E1B70EC8B7FEA71E33B91224</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/945ECE6CDCFE0549E1B70EC8B7FEA71E33B91224/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/945ECE6CDCFE0549E1B70EC8B7FEA71E33B91224/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/945ECE6CDCFE0549E1B70EC8B7FEA71E33B91224/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Colonization of recent coniferous versus deciduous forest stands by vascular plants at the local scale</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>2008 IAVS ‐ the International Association of Vegetation Science</p></availability><date>2008</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note>Supporting info item</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Colonization of recent coniferous versus deciduous forest stands by vascular plants at the local scale</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Monika</forename><surname>Wulf</surname></persName><email>mwulf@zalf.de</email><affiliation>Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Research (ZALF e.V.), Institute of Land Use Systems and Landscape Ecology, Eberswalder Straße 84, DE‐15374 Müncheberg, Germany;</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">Thilo</forename><surname>Heinken</surname></persName><affiliation>Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, Community Ecology/Systematic Botany, University of Potsdam, Maulbeerallee 1, DE‐14469 Potsdam, Germany; E‐mail heinken@uni‐potsdam.de;</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Applied Vegetation Science</title><idno type="pISSN">1402-2001</idno><idno type="eISSN">1654-109X</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1654-109X</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2008-08"></date><biblScope unit="volume">11</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="307">307</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="316">316</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">945ECE6CDCFE0549E1B70EC8B7FEA71E33B91224</idno><idno type="DOI">10.3170/2008-7-18432</idno><idno type="ArticleID">AVSC447</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2008</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract><p>Questions: 1. Are there differences among species in their preference for coniferous vs. deciduous forest? 2. Are tree and shrub species better colonizers of recent forest stands than herbaceous species? 3. Do colonization patterns of plant species groups depend on tree species composition?</p></abstract><abstract><p>Location: Three deciduous and one coniferous recent forest areas in Brandenburg, NE Germany.</p></abstract><abstract><p>Methods: In 34 and 21 transects in coniferous and deciduous stands, respectively, we studied the occurrence and percentage cover of vascular plants in a total of 150 plots in ancient stands, 315 in recent stands and 55 at the ecotone. Habitat preference, diaspore weight, generative dispersal potential and clonal extension were used to explain mechanisms of local migration. Regression analysis was conducted to test whether migration distance was related to species’ life‐history traits.</p></abstract><abstract><p>Results: 25 species were significantly associated with ancient stands and ten species were significantly more frequent in recent stands. Tree and shrub species were good colonizers of recent coniferous and deciduous stands. In the coniferous stands, all herbaceous species showed a strong dispersal limitation during colonization, whereas in the deciduous stands generalist species may have survived in the grasslands which were present prior to afforestation.</p></abstract><abstract><p>Conclusions: The fast colonization of recent stands by trees and shrubs can be explained by their effective dispersal via wind and animals. This, and the comparably efficient migration of herbaceous forest specialists into recent coniferous stands, implies that the conversion of coniferous into deciduous stands adjacent to ancient deciduous forests is promising even without planting of trees.</p></abstract><textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>keywords</head><item><term>Clonal growth</term></item><item><term>Diaspore weight</term></item><item><term>Dispersal potential</term></item><item><term>Forest specialist</term></item><item><term>Generalist emergent group</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2008-08">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/945ECE6CDCFE0549E1B70EC8B7FEA71E33B91224/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1654-109X</doi><issn type="print">1402-2001</issn><issn type="electronic">1654-109X</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="AVSC"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="APPLIED VEGETATION SCIENCE">Applied Vegetation Science</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="08103"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/avsc.2008.11.issue-3</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="11">11</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="3">3</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2008-08">August 2008</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="3" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.3170/2008-7-18432</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="AVSC447"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="10"></count></countGroup><copyright>2008 IAVS ‐ the International Association of Vegetation Science</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2009-02-05"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2009-02-05"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:3.1.9 mode:FullText" date="2012-11-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-15"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="307">307</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="316">316</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><i>Corresponding author; Fax +49 3343282387; E‐mail </i><email>mwulf@zalf.de</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:AVSC.AVSC447.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Received 8 May 2007; Accepted 5 November 2007</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="referenceTotal" number="41"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="3"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Colonization of recent coniferous versus deciduous forest stands by vascular plants at the local scale</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Monika</givenNames><familyName>Wulf</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Thilo</givenNames><familyName>Heinken</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="DE"><unparsedAffiliation><i>Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Research (ZALF e.V.), Institute of Land Use Systems and Landscape Ecology, Eberswalder Straße 84, DE‐15374 Müncheberg, Germany;</i></unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="DE"><unparsedAffiliation><i>Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, Community Ecology/Systematic Botany, University of Potsdam, Maulbeerallee 1, DE‐14469 Potsdam, Germany; E‐mail </i><email normalForm="heinken@uni-potsdam.de">heinken@uni‐potsdam.de</email><i>;</i></unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">Clonal growth</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">Diaspore weight</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">Dispersal potential</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">Forest specialist</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">Generalist emergent group</keyword></keywordGroup><supportingInformation><supportingInfoItem><mediaResource alt="supporting info item" href="urn-x:wiley:14022001:media:avsc447:AVSC_447_sm_app"></mediaResource><caption>Supporting info item</caption></supportingInfoItem></supportingInformation><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract.</title><p><b>Questions: </b> 1. Are there differences among species in their preference for coniferous vs. deciduous forest? 2. Are tree and shrub species better colonizers of recent forest stands than herbaceous species? 3. Do colonization patterns of plant species groups depend on tree species composition?</p><p><b>Location: </b> Three deciduous and one coniferous recent forest areas in Brandenburg, NE Germany.</p><p><b>Methods: </b> In 34 and 21 transects in coniferous and deciduous stands, respectively, we studied the occurrence and percentage cover of vascular plants in a total of 150 plots in ancient stands, 315 in recent stands and 55 at the ecotone. Habitat preference, diaspore weight, generative dispersal potential and clonal extension were used to explain mechanisms of local migration. Regression analysis was conducted to test whether migration distance was related to species’ life‐history traits.</p><p><b>Results: </b> 25 species were significantly associated with ancient stands and ten species were significantly more frequent in recent stands. Tree and shrub species were good colonizers of recent coniferous and deciduous stands. In the coniferous stands, all herbaceous species showed a strong dispersal limitation during colonization, whereas in the deciduous stands generalist species may have survived in the grasslands which were present prior to afforestation.</p><p><b>Conclusions: </b> The fast colonization of recent stands by trees and shrubs can be explained by their effective dispersal via wind and animals. This, and the comparably efficient migration of herbaceous forest specialists into recent coniferous stands, implies that the conversion of coniferous into deciduous stands adjacent to ancient deciduous forests is promising even without planting of trees.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta><noteGroup><note xml:id="n-fnt-1"><p><b>Nomenclature</b>: Wisskirchen & Haeupler (1998).</p></note></noteGroup></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Colonization of recent coniferous versus deciduous forest stands by vascular plants at the local scale</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Colonization of recent coniferous versus deciduous forest stands by vascular plants at the local scale</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Monika</namePart><namePart type="family">Wulf</namePart><affiliation>Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Research (ZALF e.V.), Institute of Land Use Systems and Landscape Ecology, Eberswalder Straße 84, DE‐15374 Müncheberg, Germany;</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: mwulf@zalf.de</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Thilo</namePart><namePart type="family">Heinken</namePart><affiliation>Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, Community Ecology/Systematic Botany, University of Potsdam, Maulbeerallee 1, DE‐14469 Potsdam, Germany; E‐mail heinken@uni‐potsdam.de;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2008-08</dateIssued><edition>Received 8 May 2007; Accepted 5 November 2007</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2008</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="references">41</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Questions: 1. Are there differences among species in their preference for coniferous vs. deciduous forest? 2. Are tree and shrub species better colonizers of recent forest stands than herbaceous species? 3. Do colonization patterns of plant species groups depend on tree species composition?</abstract><abstract>Location: Three deciduous and one coniferous recent forest areas in Brandenburg, NE Germany.</abstract><abstract>Methods: In 34 and 21 transects in coniferous and deciduous stands, respectively, we studied the occurrence and percentage cover of vascular plants in a total of 150 plots in ancient stands, 315 in recent stands and 55 at the ecotone. Habitat preference, diaspore weight, generative dispersal potential and clonal extension were used to explain mechanisms of local migration. Regression analysis was conducted to test whether migration distance was related to species’ life‐history traits.</abstract><abstract>Results: 25 species were significantly associated with ancient stands and ten species were significantly more frequent in recent stands. Tree and shrub species were good colonizers of recent coniferous and deciduous stands. In the coniferous stands, all herbaceous species showed a strong dispersal limitation during colonization, whereas in the deciduous stands generalist species may have survived in the grasslands which were present prior to afforestation.</abstract><abstract>Conclusions: The fast colonization of recent stands by trees and shrubs can be explained by their effective dispersal via wind and animals. This, and the comparably efficient migration of herbaceous forest specialists into recent coniferous stands, implies that the conversion of coniferous into deciduous stands adjacent to ancient deciduous forests is promising even without planting of trees.</abstract><note type="additional physical form">Supporting info item</note><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>Clonal growth</topic><topic>Diaspore weight</topic><topic>Dispersal potential</topic><topic>Forest specialist</topic><topic>Generalist emergent group</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Applied Vegetation Science</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1402-2001</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1654-109X</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1654-109X</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">AVSC</identifier><part><date>2008</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>11</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>3</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>307</start><end>316</end><total>10</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">945ECE6CDCFE0549E1B70EC8B7FEA71E33B91224</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.3170/2008-7-18432</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">AVSC447</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">2008 IAVS ‐ the International Association of Vegetation Science</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Bois/explor/CheneBelgiqueV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000976 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000976 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Bois
|area= CheneBelgiqueV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:945ECE6CDCFE0549E1B70EC8B7FEA71E33B91224
|texte= Colonization of recent coniferous versus deciduous forest stands by vascular plants at the local scale
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.27. |  |