The Impact of Competition and Allelopathy on the Trade-Off between Plant Defense and Growth in Two Contrasting Tree Species.
Identifieur interne : 001F18 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 001F17; suivant : 001F19The Impact of Competition and Allelopathy on the Trade-Off between Plant Defense and Growth in Two Contrasting Tree Species.
Auteurs : Catherine Fernandez ; Yogan Monnier ; Mathieu Santonja ; Christiane Gallet ; Leslie A. Weston ; Bernard Prévosto ; Amélie Saunier ; Virginie Baldy ; Anne Bousquet-MélouSource :
- Frontiers in plant science [ 1664-462X ] ; 2016.
Abstract
In contrast to plant-animal interactions, the conceptual framework regarding the impact of secondary metabolites in mediating plant-plant interference is currently less well defined. Here, we address hypotheses about the role of chemically-mediated plant-plant interference (i.e., allelopathy) as a driver of Mediterranean forest dynamics. Growth and defense abilities of a pioneer (Pinus halepensis) and a late-successional (Quercus pubescens) Mediterranean forest species were evaluated under three different plant interference conditions: (i) allelopathy simulated by application of aqueous needle extracts of Pinus, (ii) resource competition created by the physical presence of a neighboring species (Pinus or Quercus), and (iii) a combination of both allelopathy and competition. After 24 months of experimentation in simulated field conditions, Quercus was more affected by plant interference treatments than was Pinus, and a hierarchical response to biotic interference (allelopathy < competition < allelopathy + competition) was observed in terms of relative impact on growth and plant defense. Both species modulated their respective metabolic profiles according to plant interference treatment and thus their inherent chemical defense status, resulting in a physiological trade-off between plant growth and production of defense metabolites. For Quercus, an increase in secondary metabolite production and a decrease in plant growth were observed in all treatments. In contrast, this trade-off in Pinus was only observed in competition and allelopathy + competition treatments. Although Pinus and Quercus expressed differential responses when subjected to a single interference condition, either allelopathy or competition, species responses were similar or positively correlated when strong interference conditions (allelopathy + competition) were imposed.
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00594
PubMed: 27200062
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:27200062Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The Impact of Competition and Allelopathy on the Trade-Off between Plant Defense and Growth in Two Contrasting Tree Species.</title><author><name sortKey="Fernandez, Catherine" sort="Fernandez, Catherine" uniqKey="Fernandez C" first="Catherine" last="Fernandez">Catherine Fernandez</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Institut Méditerranéen de Biodiversité et d'Ecologie Marine et Continentale - Aix Marseille Université - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - IRD - Avignon Université Marseille, France.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Monnier, Yogan" sort="Monnier, Yogan" uniqKey="Monnier Y" first="Yogan" last="Monnier">Yogan Monnier</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Institut Méditerranéen de Biodiversité et d'Ecologie Marine et Continentale - Aix Marseille Université - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - IRD - Avignon Université Marseille, France.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Santonja, Mathieu" sort="Santonja, Mathieu" uniqKey="Santonja M" first="Mathieu" last="Santonja">Mathieu Santonja</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Institut Méditerranéen de Biodiversité et d'Ecologie Marine et Continentale - Aix Marseille Université - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - IRD - Avignon Université Marseille, France.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gallet, Christiane" sort="Gallet, Christiane" uniqKey="Gallet C" first="Christiane" last="Gallet">Christiane Gallet</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine - Université de Savoie-Mont-Blanc Chambéry, France.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Weston, Leslie A" sort="Weston, Leslie A" uniqKey="Weston L" first="Leslie A" last="Weston">Leslie A. Weston</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation- Charles Sturt University Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Prevosto, Bernard" sort="Prevosto, Bernard" uniqKey="Prevosto B" first="Bernard" last="Prévosto">Bernard Prévosto</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Institut National de Recherche en Sciences et Technologies Pour l'Environnement et l'Agriculture Aix-en-Provence, France.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Saunier, Amelie" sort="Saunier, Amelie" uniqKey="Saunier A" first="Amélie" last="Saunier">Amélie Saunier</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Institut Méditerranéen de Biodiversité et d'Ecologie Marine et Continentale - Aix Marseille Université - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - IRD - Avignon Université Marseille, France.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Baldy, Virginie" sort="Baldy, Virginie" uniqKey="Baldy V" first="Virginie" last="Baldy">Virginie Baldy</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Institut Méditerranéen de Biodiversité et d'Ecologie Marine et Continentale - Aix Marseille Université - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - IRD - Avignon Université Marseille, France.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bousquet Melou, Anne" sort="Bousquet Melou, Anne" uniqKey="Bousquet Melou A" first="Anne" last="Bousquet-Mélou">Anne Bousquet-Mélou</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Institut Méditerranéen de Biodiversité et d'Ecologie Marine et Continentale - Aix Marseille Université - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - IRD - Avignon Université Marseille, France.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2016">2016</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:27200062</idno><idno type="pmid">27200062</idno><idno type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2016.00594</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001F18</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001F18</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">The Impact of Competition and Allelopathy on the Trade-Off between Plant Defense and Growth in Two Contrasting Tree Species.</title><author><name sortKey="Fernandez, Catherine" sort="Fernandez, Catherine" uniqKey="Fernandez C" first="Catherine" last="Fernandez">Catherine Fernandez</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Institut Méditerranéen de Biodiversité et d'Ecologie Marine et Continentale - Aix Marseille Université - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - IRD - Avignon Université Marseille, France.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Monnier, Yogan" sort="Monnier, Yogan" uniqKey="Monnier Y" first="Yogan" last="Monnier">Yogan Monnier</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Institut Méditerranéen de Biodiversité et d'Ecologie Marine et Continentale - Aix Marseille Université - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - IRD - Avignon Université Marseille, France.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Santonja, Mathieu" sort="Santonja, Mathieu" uniqKey="Santonja M" first="Mathieu" last="Santonja">Mathieu Santonja</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Institut Méditerranéen de Biodiversité et d'Ecologie Marine et Continentale - Aix Marseille Université - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - IRD - Avignon Université Marseille, France.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gallet, Christiane" sort="Gallet, Christiane" uniqKey="Gallet C" first="Christiane" last="Gallet">Christiane Gallet</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine - Université de Savoie-Mont-Blanc Chambéry, France.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Weston, Leslie A" sort="Weston, Leslie A" uniqKey="Weston L" first="Leslie A" last="Weston">Leslie A. Weston</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation- Charles Sturt University Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Prevosto, Bernard" sort="Prevosto, Bernard" uniqKey="Prevosto B" first="Bernard" last="Prévosto">Bernard Prévosto</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Institut National de Recherche en Sciences et Technologies Pour l'Environnement et l'Agriculture Aix-en-Provence, France.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Saunier, Amelie" sort="Saunier, Amelie" uniqKey="Saunier A" first="Amélie" last="Saunier">Amélie Saunier</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Institut Méditerranéen de Biodiversité et d'Ecologie Marine et Continentale - Aix Marseille Université - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - IRD - Avignon Université Marseille, France.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Baldy, Virginie" sort="Baldy, Virginie" uniqKey="Baldy V" first="Virginie" last="Baldy">Virginie Baldy</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Institut Méditerranéen de Biodiversité et d'Ecologie Marine et Continentale - Aix Marseille Université - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - IRD - Avignon Université Marseille, France.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bousquet Melou, Anne" sort="Bousquet Melou, Anne" uniqKey="Bousquet Melou A" first="Anne" last="Bousquet-Mélou">Anne Bousquet-Mélou</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Institut Méditerranéen de Biodiversité et d'Ecologie Marine et Continentale - Aix Marseille Université - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - IRD - Avignon Université Marseille, France.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Frontiers in plant science</title><idno type="ISSN">1664-462X</idno><imprint><date when="2016" type="published">2016</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">In contrast to plant-animal interactions, the conceptual framework regarding the impact of secondary metabolites in mediating plant-plant interference is currently less well defined. Here, we address hypotheses about the role of chemically-mediated plant-plant interference (i.e., allelopathy) as a driver of Mediterranean forest dynamics. Growth and defense abilities of a pioneer (Pinus halepensis) and a late-successional (Quercus pubescens) Mediterranean forest species were evaluated under three different plant interference conditions: (i) allelopathy simulated by application of aqueous needle extracts of Pinus, (ii) resource competition created by the physical presence of a neighboring species (Pinus or Quercus), and (iii) a combination of both allelopathy and competition. After 24 months of experimentation in simulated field conditions, Quercus was more affected by plant interference treatments than was Pinus, and a hierarchical response to biotic interference (allelopathy < competition < allelopathy + competition) was observed in terms of relative impact on growth and plant defense. Both species modulated their respective metabolic profiles according to plant interference treatment and thus their inherent chemical defense status, resulting in a physiological trade-off between plant growth and production of defense metabolites. For Quercus, an increase in secondary metabolite production and a decrease in plant growth were observed in all treatments. In contrast, this trade-off in Pinus was only observed in competition and allelopathy + competition treatments. Although Pinus and Quercus expressed differential responses when subjected to a single interference condition, either allelopathy or competition, species responses were similar or positively correlated when strong interference conditions (allelopathy + competition) were imposed.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="PubMed-not-MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">27200062</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2016</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>20</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2016</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>20</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2017</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>20</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Electronic-eCollection"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">1664-462X</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>7</Volume><PubDate><Year>2016</Year></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Frontiers in plant science</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Front Plant Sci</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>The Impact of Competition and Allelopathy on the Trade-Off between Plant Defense and Growth in Two Contrasting Tree Species.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>594</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.3389/fpls.2016.00594</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>In contrast to plant-animal interactions, the conceptual framework regarding the impact of secondary metabolites in mediating plant-plant interference is currently less well defined. Here, we address hypotheses about the role of chemically-mediated plant-plant interference (i.e., allelopathy) as a driver of Mediterranean forest dynamics. Growth and defense abilities of a pioneer (Pinus halepensis) and a late-successional (Quercus pubescens) Mediterranean forest species were evaluated under three different plant interference conditions: (i) allelopathy simulated by application of aqueous needle extracts of Pinus, (ii) resource competition created by the physical presence of a neighboring species (Pinus or Quercus), and (iii) a combination of both allelopathy and competition. After 24 months of experimentation in simulated field conditions, Quercus was more affected by plant interference treatments than was Pinus, and a hierarchical response to biotic interference (allelopathy < competition < allelopathy + competition) was observed in terms of relative impact on growth and plant defense. Both species modulated their respective metabolic profiles according to plant interference treatment and thus their inherent chemical defense status, resulting in a physiological trade-off between plant growth and production of defense metabolites. For Quercus, an increase in secondary metabolite production and a decrease in plant growth were observed in all treatments. In contrast, this trade-off in Pinus was only observed in competition and allelopathy + competition treatments. Although Pinus and Quercus expressed differential responses when subjected to a single interference condition, either allelopathy or competition, species responses were similar or positively correlated when strong interference conditions (allelopathy + competition) were imposed.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Fernandez</LastName><ForeName>Catherine</ForeName><Initials>C</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Institut Méditerranéen de Biodiversité et d'Ecologie Marine et Continentale - Aix Marseille Université - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - IRD - Avignon Université Marseille, France.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Monnier</LastName><ForeName>Yogan</ForeName><Initials>Y</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Institut Méditerranéen de Biodiversité et d'Ecologie Marine et Continentale - Aix Marseille Université - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - IRD - Avignon Université Marseille, France.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Santonja</LastName><ForeName>Mathieu</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Institut Méditerranéen de Biodiversité et d'Ecologie Marine et Continentale - Aix Marseille Université - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - IRD - Avignon Université Marseille, France.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Gallet</LastName><ForeName>Christiane</ForeName><Initials>C</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine - Université de Savoie-Mont-Blanc Chambéry, France.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Weston</LastName><ForeName>Leslie A</ForeName><Initials>LA</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation- Charles Sturt University Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Prévosto</LastName><ForeName>Bernard</ForeName><Initials>B</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Institut National de Recherche en Sciences et Technologies Pour l'Environnement et l'Agriculture Aix-en-Provence, France.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Saunier</LastName><ForeName>Amélie</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Institut Méditerranéen de Biodiversité et d'Ecologie Marine et Continentale - Aix Marseille Université - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - IRD - Avignon Université Marseille, France.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Baldy</LastName><ForeName>Virginie</ForeName><Initials>V</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Institut Méditerranéen de Biodiversité et d'Ecologie Marine et Continentale - Aix Marseille Université - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - IRD - Avignon Université Marseille, France.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Bousquet-Mélou</LastName><ForeName>Anne</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Institut Méditerranéen de Biodiversité et d'Ecologie Marine et Continentale - Aix Marseille Université - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - IRD - Avignon Université Marseille, France.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2016</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>04</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Switzerland</Country><MedlineTA>Front Plant Sci</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101568200</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1664-462X</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>New Phytol. 2007;173(1):146-53</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17176401</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Oecologia. 2006 Dec;150(3):442-52</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16944243</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Chemosphere. 2007 Feb;67(2):276-84</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17156816</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Chem Ecol. 2013 Feb;39(2):298-311</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23328817</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Jan 08;281(1777):20132615</RefSource><PMID Version="1">24403332</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Chem Ecol. 1994 Jun;20(6):1281-328</RefSource><PMID Version="1">24242341</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Plant Cell Environ. 2009 Jun;32(6):641-53</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19021888</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>BMC Plant Biol. 2010 Jun 17;10 :115</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20565801</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>PLoS One. 2014 Nov 10;9(11):e112418</RefSource><PMID Version="1">25383554</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jul 10;109(28):11240-5</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22733785</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Science. 2000 Oct 20;290(5491):521-3</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11039934</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Ann Bot. 2006 Dec;98(6):1261-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17028297</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Oecologia. 2012 May;169(1):269-79</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22081261</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Phytochemistry. 2007 Mar;68(6):840-52</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17258247</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Environ Pollut. 2004 Sep;131(1):55-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15210275</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Trends Ecol Evol. 2011 Dec;26(12):655-62</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21920626</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Q Rev Biol. 2003 Mar;78(1):23-55</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12661508</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nat Chem Biol. 2007 Jul;3(7):408-14</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17576428</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Z Naturforsch C. 2007 Mar-Apr;62(3-4):207-14</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17542486</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Chem Ecol. 1994 May;20(5):1009-24</RefSource><PMID Version="1">24242299</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Trends Plant Sci. 2004 Jan;9(1):26-32</RefSource><PMID Version="1">14729216</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Science. 2007 Sep 14;317(5844):1561-3</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17872447</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Trends Ecol Evol. 2007 Feb;22(2):103-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17097760</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Plant Cell Environ. 2009 Jun;32(6):726-41</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19389051</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Chem Ecol. 2013 Feb;39(2):283-97</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23397456</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Oecologia. 2014 Nov;176(3):811-24</RefSource><PMID Version="1">25173086</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Chem Ecol. 2009 Aug;35(8):970-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19629599</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Molecules. 2011 Oct 24;16(10):8874-93</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22024957</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Ann Bot. 2013 Aug;112(4):651-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23378522</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Phytochemistry. 2014 Oct;106:69-85</RefSource><PMID Version="1">25073950</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Agric Food Chem. 2002 Apr 10;50(8):2283-92</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11929285</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Mol Plant. 2014 Aug;7(8):1267-87</RefSource><PMID Version="1">24777989</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Ecology. 2008 May;89(5):1181-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18543611</PMID></CommentsCorrections></CommentsCorrectionsList><OtherID Source="NLM">PMC4855863</OtherID><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Pinus halepensis</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Quercus pubescens</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">allelopathy</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">competition</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">ecometabolomics</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">metabolic profiling</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">phenotypic response</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">secondary metabolism</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2016</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>19</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2016</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>18</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2016</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>21</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2016</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>21</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2016</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>21</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>epublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">27200062</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.3389/fpls.2016.00594</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC4855863</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Asie/explor/AustralieFrV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001F18 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001F18 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Asie
|area= AustralieFrV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:27200062
|texte= The Impact of Competition and Allelopathy on the Trade-Off between Plant Defense and Growth in Two Contrasting Tree Species.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:27200062" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a AustralieFrV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |