Isochronous Sequential Presentation Helps Children Orient Their Attention in Time.
Identifieur interne : 001933 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 001932; suivant : 001934Isochronous Sequential Presentation Helps Children Orient Their Attention in Time.
Auteurs : Katherine A. Johnson ; Marita Bryan ; Kira Polonowita ; Delia Decroupet ; Jennifer T. CoullSource :
- Frontiers in psychology [ 1664-1078 ] ; 2016.
Abstract
Knowing when an event is likely to occur allows attentional resources to be oriented toward that moment in time, enhancing processing of the event. We previously found that children (mean age 11 years) are unable to use endogenous temporal cues to orient attention in time, despite being able to use endogenous spatial cues (arrows) to orient attention in space. Arrow cues, however, may have proved beneficial by engaging exogenous (automatic), as well as endogenous (voluntary), orienting mechanisms. We therefore conducted two studies in which the exogenous properties of visual temporal cues were increased, to examine whether this helped children orient their attention in time. In the first study, the location of an imperative target was predicted by the direction of a left or right spatial arrow cue while its onset was predicted by the relative duration of a short or long temporal cue. To minimize the influence of rhythmic entrainment in the temporal condition, the foreperiod (500 ms/1100 ms) was deliberately chosen so as not to precisely match the duration of the temporal cue (100 ms/400 ms). Targets appeared either at cued locations/onset times (valid trials) or at unexpected locations/onset times (invalid trials). Adults' response times were significantly slower for invalid versus valid trials, in both spatial and temporal domains. Despite being slowed by invalid spatial cues, children (mean age 10.7 years) were unperturbed by invalid temporal cues, suggesting that these duration-based temporal cues did not help them orient attention in time. In the second study, we enhanced the exogenous properties of temporal cues further, by presenting multiple temporal cues in an isochronous (rhythmic) sequence. Again, to minimize automatic entrainment, target onset did not match the isochronous interval. Children (mean age 11.4 years), as well as adults, were now significantly slowed by invalid cues in both the temporal and spatial dimension. The sequential, as opposed to single, presentation of temporal cues therefore helped children to orient their attention in time. We suggest that the exogenous properties of sequential presentation provide a temporal scaffold that supports the additional attentional and mnemonic requirements of temporal, as compared to spatial, processing.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01417
PubMed: 27713713
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:27713713Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Isochronous Sequential Presentation Helps Children Orient Their Attention in Time.</title><author><name sortKey="Johnson, Katherine A" sort="Johnson, Katherine A" uniqKey="Johnson K" first="Katherine A" last="Johnson">Katherine A. Johnson</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville VIC, Australia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bryan, Marita" sort="Bryan, Marita" uniqKey="Bryan M" first="Marita" last="Bryan">Marita Bryan</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville VIC, Australia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Polonowita, Kira" sort="Polonowita, Kira" uniqKey="Polonowita K" first="Kira" last="Polonowita">Kira Polonowita</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville VIC, Australia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Decroupet, Delia" sort="Decroupet, Delia" uniqKey="Decroupet D" first="Delia" last="Decroupet">Delia Decroupet</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville VIC, Australia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Coull, Jennifer T" sort="Coull, Jennifer T" uniqKey="Coull J" first="Jennifer T" last="Coull">Jennifer T. Coull</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Laboratoire des Neurosciences Cognitives, Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS Marseille, France.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2016">2016</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:27713713</idno><idno type="pmid">27713713</idno><idno type="doi">10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01417</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001933</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001933</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Isochronous Sequential Presentation Helps Children Orient Their Attention in Time.</title><author><name sortKey="Johnson, Katherine A" sort="Johnson, Katherine A" uniqKey="Johnson K" first="Katherine A" last="Johnson">Katherine A. Johnson</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville VIC, Australia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bryan, Marita" sort="Bryan, Marita" uniqKey="Bryan M" first="Marita" last="Bryan">Marita Bryan</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville VIC, Australia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Polonowita, Kira" sort="Polonowita, Kira" uniqKey="Polonowita K" first="Kira" last="Polonowita">Kira Polonowita</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville VIC, Australia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Decroupet, Delia" sort="Decroupet, Delia" uniqKey="Decroupet D" first="Delia" last="Decroupet">Delia Decroupet</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville VIC, Australia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Coull, Jennifer T" sort="Coull, Jennifer T" uniqKey="Coull J" first="Jennifer T" last="Coull">Jennifer T. Coull</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Laboratoire des Neurosciences Cognitives, Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS Marseille, France.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Frontiers in psychology</title><idno type="ISSN">1664-1078</idno><imprint><date when="2016" type="published">2016</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Knowing when an event is likely to occur allows attentional resources to be oriented toward that moment in time, enhancing processing of the event. We previously found that children (mean age 11 years) are unable to use endogenous temporal cues to orient attention in time, despite being able to use endogenous spatial cues (arrows) to orient attention in space. Arrow cues, however, may have proved beneficial by engaging exogenous (automatic), as well as endogenous (voluntary), orienting mechanisms. We therefore conducted two studies in which the exogenous properties of visual temporal cues were increased, to examine whether this helped children orient their attention in time. In the first study, the location of an imperative target was predicted by the direction of a left or right spatial arrow cue while its onset was predicted by the relative duration of a short or long temporal cue. To minimize the influence of rhythmic entrainment in the temporal condition, the foreperiod (500 ms/1100 ms) was deliberately chosen so as not to precisely match the duration of the temporal cue (100 ms/400 ms). Targets appeared either at cued locations/onset times (valid trials) or at unexpected locations/onset times (invalid trials). Adults' response times were significantly slower for invalid versus valid trials, in both spatial and temporal domains. Despite being slowed by invalid spatial cues, children (mean age 10.7 years) were unperturbed by invalid temporal cues, suggesting that these duration-based temporal cues did not help them orient attention in time. In the second study, we enhanced the exogenous properties of temporal cues further, by presenting multiple temporal cues in an isochronous (rhythmic) sequence. Again, to minimize automatic entrainment, target onset did not match the isochronous interval. Children (mean age 11.4 years), as well as adults, were now significantly slowed by invalid cues in both the temporal and spatial dimension. The sequential, as opposed to single, presentation of temporal cues therefore helped children to orient their attention in time. We suggest that the exogenous properties of sequential presentation provide a temporal scaffold that supports the additional attentional and mnemonic requirements of temporal, as compared to spatial, processing.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="PubMed-not-MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">27713713</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2016</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>07</Day></DateCreated><DateRevised><Year>2017</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>16</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Electronic-eCollection"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">1664-1078</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>7</Volume><PubDate><Year>2016</Year></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Frontiers in psychology</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Front Psychol</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Isochronous Sequential Presentation Helps Children Orient Their Attention in Time.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>1417</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>Knowing when an event is likely to occur allows attentional resources to be oriented toward that moment in time, enhancing processing of the event. We previously found that children (mean age 11 years) are unable to use endogenous temporal cues to orient attention in time, despite being able to use endogenous spatial cues (arrows) to orient attention in space. Arrow cues, however, may have proved beneficial by engaging exogenous (automatic), as well as endogenous (voluntary), orienting mechanisms. We therefore conducted two studies in which the exogenous properties of visual temporal cues were increased, to examine whether this helped children orient their attention in time. In the first study, the location of an imperative target was predicted by the direction of a left or right spatial arrow cue while its onset was predicted by the relative duration of a short or long temporal cue. To minimize the influence of rhythmic entrainment in the temporal condition, the foreperiod (500 ms/1100 ms) was deliberately chosen so as not to precisely match the duration of the temporal cue (100 ms/400 ms). Targets appeared either at cued locations/onset times (valid trials) or at unexpected locations/onset times (invalid trials). Adults' response times were significantly slower for invalid versus valid trials, in both spatial and temporal domains. Despite being slowed by invalid spatial cues, children (mean age 10.7 years) were unperturbed by invalid temporal cues, suggesting that these duration-based temporal cues did not help them orient attention in time. In the second study, we enhanced the exogenous properties of temporal cues further, by presenting multiple temporal cues in an isochronous (rhythmic) sequence. Again, to minimize automatic entrainment, target onset did not match the isochronous interval. Children (mean age 11.4 years), as well as adults, were now significantly slowed by invalid cues in both the temporal and spatial dimension. The sequential, as opposed to single, presentation of temporal cues therefore helped children to orient their attention in time. We suggest that the exogenous properties of sequential presentation provide a temporal scaffold that supports the additional attentional and mnemonic requirements of temporal, as compared to spatial, processing.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Johnson</LastName><ForeName>Katherine A</ForeName><Initials>KA</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville VIC, Australia.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Bryan</LastName><ForeName>Marita</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville VIC, Australia.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Polonowita</LastName><ForeName>Kira</ForeName><Initials>K</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville VIC, Australia.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Decroupet</LastName><ForeName>Delia</ForeName><Initials>D</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville VIC, Australia.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Coull</LastName><ForeName>Jennifer T</ForeName><Initials>JT</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Laboratoire des Neurosciences Cognitives, Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS Marseille, France.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2016</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>22</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Switzerland</Country><MedlineTA>Front Psychol</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101550902</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1664-1078</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Jun;41(3):790-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">25893682</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Jun;109(2):143-57</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21334637</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Dev Sci. 2007 Nov;10(6):770-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17973794</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Dev Sci. 2009 Mar;12(2):289-96</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19143801</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 1993 Sep;54(3):277-86</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8414886</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1995 Feb;21(1):3-18</RefSource><PMID Version="1">7707031</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Q J Exp Psychol A. 2005 May;58(4):693-704</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16104102</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cognition. 2000 Dec 15;77(3):251-88</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11018511</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2007 Sep;48(9):881-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17714373</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(8):1029-40</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15093142</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001 Apr;27(2):370-86</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11318053</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol. 1959 Aug;58:185-91</RefSource><PMID Version="1">14404508</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Nov;72(8):2274-88</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21097869</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Aug;38(4):880-90</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22390291</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuropsychologia. 2013 Jan;51(2):220-34</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22999968</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Dev Sci. 2009 Sep;12(5):715-24</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19702764</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Mar;3(3):201-15</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11994752</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Psychophysiology. 2003 Sep;40(5):806-17</RefSource><PMID Version="1">14696734</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Neurosci. 1998 Sep 15;18(18):7426-35</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9736662</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>PLoS One. 2015 Jul 02;10(7):e0130465</RefSource><PMID Version="1">26135743</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Child Psychol. 2012 Jul;112(3):296-311</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22621934</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Psychol Res. 1998;61(4):269-76</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9870294</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 1982 Sep;32(3):211-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">7177759</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cogn Sci. 2010 Apr;34(3):387-405</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21564218</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 May;73(4):1016-20</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21327745</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 Apr 1;14(3):508-23</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11970810</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Q J Exp Psychol. 1980 Feb;32(1):3-25</RefSource><PMID Version="1">7367577</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>PLoS Biol. 2009 Aug;7(8):e1000166</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19652699</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Psychol Sci. 2002 Sep;13(5):475-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12219817</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Psychol Sci. 2002 Jul;13(4):313-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12137133</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Feb 17;106(7):2468-71</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19171894</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Psychophysiol. 2012 Feb;83(2):256-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22226901</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>PLoS One. 2013 Aug 21;8(8):e71424</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23990953</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 1989 Apr;45(4):291-6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">2710629</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol Gen. 2005 Feb;134(1):52-72</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15702963</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 Jun;60(6):820-36</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17514596</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Child Psychol. 2001 Oct;80(2):142-59</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11529672</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Science. 2005 Jun 3;308(5727):1430</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15933193</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cogn Psychol. 2000 Nov;41(3):254-311</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11032658</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Front Psychol. 2013 Nov 05;4:803</RefSource><PMID Version="1">24204352</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Child Dev. 1988 Apr;59(2):467-79</RefSource><PMID Version="1">3359865</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Biol Psychol. 1997 Jun 20;46(1):67-71</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9255432</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cognition. 2014 Feb;130(2):141-51</RefSource><PMID Version="1">24291265</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016 Oct;69(10 ):1864-75</RefSource><PMID Version="1">25176352</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 1996 Jan;58(1):34-46</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8668518</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Psychol Sci. 2013 Jan 1;24(1):11-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23160202</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Feb;125(2):1040-49</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19206878</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 Oct;21(2):227-33</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15464354</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Brain Cogn. 2010 Aug;73(3):222-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20566235</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Sep;9(3):507-13</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12412890</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>PLoS One. 2015 Aug 11;10(8):e0135098</RefSource><PMID Version="1">26262878</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Dev Psychol. 2000 Jan;36(1):91-108</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10645747</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nat Commun. 2014 Oct 15;5:5255</RefSource><PMID Version="1">25314898</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Neurosci. 2005 Sep 7;25(36):8259-66</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16148233</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Can J Exp Psychol. 1994 Jun;48(2):301-18</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8069287</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Dec;33(6):1377-88</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18085950</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cognition. 2013 Apr;127(1):22-30</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23318351</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2008 Apr;18(2):137-44</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18692573</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 2014 Nov;232(11):3623-33</RefSource><PMID Version="1">25081102</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Oct;150:141-54</RefSource><PMID Version="1">27295205</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Vision Res. 2011 Jul 1;51(13):1484-525</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21549742</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Oct;78(7):2185-98</RefSource><PMID Version="1">27068051</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Front Psychol. 2012 Aug 28;3:308</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22973245</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Neurophysiol. 2008 Feb;99(2):939-49</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18094101</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Dev Neuropsychol. 2005;27(2):237-55</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15753048</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(4):671-86</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22950870</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuropsychologia. 2011 Dec;49(14):3917-30</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22019698</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuropsychologia. 2000;38(6):808-19</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10689056</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Jul;26(7):1555-71</RefSource><PMID Version="1">24392898</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 2004 Feb;66(2):264-78</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15129748</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Mar;26(3):593-605</RefSource><PMID Version="1">24168222</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Jun;9(2):314-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12120794</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>PLoS One. 2015 Apr 16;10(4):e0123625</RefSource><PMID Version="1">25881188</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>PLoS One. 2011 Jan 28;6(1):e14620</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21297968</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Child Psychol. 1989 Oct;48(2):171-89</RefSource><PMID Version="1">2794852</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 2005 Jan;67(1):168-84</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15912880</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Neurophysiol. 2008 Sep;100(3):1649-55</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18632896</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2007 Aug;17(4):465-70</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17709239</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Child Dev. 1990 Dec;61(6):1779-95</RefSource><PMID Version="1">2083498</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Dev Sci. 2006 Sep;9(5):F41-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16911436</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Feb;37(1):236-44</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20718571</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Jun;19:98-106</RefSource><PMID Version="1">26946428</PMID></CommentsCorrections></CommentsCorrectionsList><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">exogenous attention</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">rhythm</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">spatial attention</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">temporal attention</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">temporal expectation</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">temporal prediction</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2016</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>20</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2016</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>05</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2016</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>8</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2016</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>8</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2016</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>8</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>epublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">27713713</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01417</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC5032676</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Asie/explor/AustralieFrV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001933 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001933 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Asie
|area= AustralieFrV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:27713713
|texte= Isochronous Sequential Presentation Helps Children Orient Their Attention in Time.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:27713713" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a AustralieFrV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |