Serveur d'exploration sur les relations entre la France et l'Australie

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Comparison of Histological Measures of Skin Photoaging

Identifieur interne : 004777 ( PascalFrancis/Curation ); précédent : 004776; suivant : 004778

Comparison of Histological Measures of Skin Photoaging

Auteurs : M. C. Hughes [Royaume-Uni] ; C. Bredoux [France] ; F. Salas [France] ; D. Lombard [France] ; G. M. Strutton [Australie] ; A. Fourtanier [France] ; A. C. Green [Royaume-Uni]

Source :

RBID : Pascal:12-0018800

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Background: Dermal elastosis is considered the histological 'gold standard' for evaluation of skin photoaging, but the relation of the level of dermal elastosis to other histological indicators of photoaging is not clear. Objective: To investigate how various proposed histological measures of photoaging compare with the level of dermal elastosis. Methods: Prospective, community-based study in Southeast Queensland, Australia, among 89 participants aged 40-82 years. Quantitative histology was used to evaluate 8 biomarkers of photoaged skin, and associations between grades of dermal elastosis and each of the other 7 biomarkers were analysed using ordinal logistic regression models with proportional odds assumption, using histological grades of elastosis as the outcome. Results: Older age, male sex and high outdoor exposure levels were confirmed as predictors of high levels of dermal elastosis. After adjustment for age and sex, the only significant positive association with increasing elastosis grades was the proportion of p53-positive cells. Epidermal thickness, interdigitation index proportion of surface covered with melanin (% Fontana-Masson staining) and glycosaminoglycan content were not associated with elastosis in either crude or adjusted models. Conclusions: Among a range of suggested biomarkers of photoaged skin, only p53-positive cells appear to be strongly associated with the level of dermal elastosis.
pA  
A01 01  1    @0 1018-8665
A03   1    @0 Dermatology : (Basel)
A05       @2 223
A06       @2 2
A08 01  1  ENG  @1 Comparison of Histological Measures of Skin Photoaging
A11 01  1    @1 HUGHES (M. C.)
A11 02  1    @1 BREDOUX (C.)
A11 03  1    @1 SALAS (F.)
A11 04  1    @1 LOMBARD (D.)
A11 05  1    @1 STRUTTON (G. M.)
A11 06  1    @1 FOURTANIER (A.)
A11 07  1    @1 GREEN (A. C.)
A14 01      @1 Cancer and Populations Studies, Queensland Institute of Medical Research @3 GBR @Z 1 aut. @Z 7 aut.
A14 02      @1 Princess Alexandra Hospital @2 Brisbane, Qld. @3 AUS @Z 5 aut.
A14 03      @1 L'Oréal Research and Innovation, Aulnay-sous-Bois @3 FRA @Z 2 aut. @Z 3 aut. @Z 4 aut.
A14 04      @1 L'Oréal Recherche @2 Clichy @3 FRA @Z 6 aut.
A14 05      @1 University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre @2 Manchester @3 GBR @Z 7 aut.
A20       @1 140-151
A21       @1 2011
A23 01      @0 ENG
A43 01      @1 INIST @2 4530 @5 354000507365380090
A44       @0 0000 @1 © 2012 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.
A45       @0 50 ref.
A47 01  1    @0 12-0018800
A60       @1 P
A61       @0 A
A64 01  1    @0 Dermatology : (Basel)
A66 01      @0 CHE
C01 01    ENG  @0 Background: Dermal elastosis is considered the histological 'gold standard' for evaluation of skin photoaging, but the relation of the level of dermal elastosis to other histological indicators of photoaging is not clear. Objective: To investigate how various proposed histological measures of photoaging compare with the level of dermal elastosis. Methods: Prospective, community-based study in Southeast Queensland, Australia, among 89 participants aged 40-82 years. Quantitative histology was used to evaluate 8 biomarkers of photoaged skin, and associations between grades of dermal elastosis and each of the other 7 biomarkers were analysed using ordinal logistic regression models with proportional odds assumption, using histological grades of elastosis as the outcome. Results: Older age, male sex and high outdoor exposure levels were confirmed as predictors of high levels of dermal elastosis. After adjustment for age and sex, the only significant positive association with increasing elastosis grades was the proportion of p53-positive cells. Epidermal thickness, interdigitation index proportion of surface covered with melanin (% Fontana-Masson staining) and glycosaminoglycan content were not associated with elastosis in either crude or adjusted models. Conclusions: Among a range of suggested biomarkers of photoaged skin, only p53-positive cells appear to be strongly associated with the level of dermal elastosis.
C02 01  X    @0 002B08
C02 02  X    @0 002B07
C03 01  X  FRE  @0 Elastose @5 01
C03 01  X  ENG  @0 Elastosis @5 01
C03 01  X  SPA  @0 Elastosis @5 01
C03 02  X  FRE  @0 Etude comparative @5 07
C03 02  X  ENG  @0 Comparative study @5 07
C03 02  X  SPA  @0 Estudio comparativo @5 07
C03 03  X  FRE  @0 Peau @5 08
C03 03  X  ENG  @0 Skin @5 08
C03 03  X  SPA  @0 Piel @5 08
C03 04  X  FRE  @0 Australie @2 NG @5 09
C03 04  X  ENG  @0 Australia @2 NG @5 09
C03 04  X  SPA  @0 Australia @2 NG @5 09
C03 05  X  FRE  @0 Dermatologie @5 13
C03 05  X  ENG  @0 Dermatology @5 13
C03 05  X  SPA  @0 Dermatología @5 13
C07 01  X  FRE  @0 Océanie @2 NG
C07 01  X  ENG  @0 Oceania @2 NG
C07 01  X  SPA  @0 Oceania @2 NG
C07 02  X  FRE  @0 Pathologie de la peau @5 37
C07 02  X  ENG  @0 Skin disease @5 37
C07 02  X  SPA  @0 Piel patología @5 37
C07 03  X  FRE  @0 Pathologie du tissu élastique @5 38
C07 03  X  ENG  @0 Elastic tissue disease @5 38
C07 03  X  SPA  @0 Tejido elástico patología @5 38
N21       @1 002
N44 01      @1 OTO
N82       @1 OTO

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

Pascal:12-0018800

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Comparison of Histological Measures of Skin Photoaging</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Hughes, M C" sort="Hughes, M C" uniqKey="Hughes M" first="M. C." last="Hughes">M. C. Hughes</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Cancer and Populations Studies, Queensland Institute of Medical Research</s1>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Royaume-Uni</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bredoux, C" sort="Bredoux, C" uniqKey="Bredoux C" first="C." last="Bredoux">C. Bredoux</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="03">
<s1>L'Oréal Research and Innovation, Aulnay-sous-Bois</s1>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>France</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Salas, F" sort="Salas, F" uniqKey="Salas F" first="F." last="Salas">F. Salas</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="03">
<s1>L'Oréal Research and Innovation, Aulnay-sous-Bois</s1>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>France</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Lombard, D" sort="Lombard, D" uniqKey="Lombard D" first="D." last="Lombard">D. Lombard</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="03">
<s1>L'Oréal Research and Innovation, Aulnay-sous-Bois</s1>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>France</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Strutton, G M" sort="Strutton, G M" uniqKey="Strutton G" first="G. M." last="Strutton">G. M. Strutton</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Princess Alexandra Hospital</s1>
<s2>Brisbane, Qld.</s2>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Australie</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Fourtanier, A" sort="Fourtanier, A" uniqKey="Fourtanier A" first="A." last="Fourtanier">A. Fourtanier</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="04">
<s1>L'Oréal Recherche</s1>
<s2>Clichy</s2>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>France</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Green, A C" sort="Green, A C" uniqKey="Green A" first="A. C." last="Green">A. C. Green</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Cancer and Populations Studies, Queensland Institute of Medical Research</s1>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Royaume-Uni</country>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="05">
<s1>University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre</s1>
<s2>Manchester</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Royaume-Uni</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">12-0018800</idno>
<date when="2011">2011</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 12-0018800 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:12-0018800</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">001732</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Curation">004777</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Comparison of Histological Measures of Skin Photoaging</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Hughes, M C" sort="Hughes, M C" uniqKey="Hughes M" first="M. C." last="Hughes">M. C. Hughes</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Cancer and Populations Studies, Queensland Institute of Medical Research</s1>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Royaume-Uni</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bredoux, C" sort="Bredoux, C" uniqKey="Bredoux C" first="C." last="Bredoux">C. Bredoux</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="03">
<s1>L'Oréal Research and Innovation, Aulnay-sous-Bois</s1>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>France</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Salas, F" sort="Salas, F" uniqKey="Salas F" first="F." last="Salas">F. Salas</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="03">
<s1>L'Oréal Research and Innovation, Aulnay-sous-Bois</s1>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>France</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Lombard, D" sort="Lombard, D" uniqKey="Lombard D" first="D." last="Lombard">D. Lombard</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="03">
<s1>L'Oréal Research and Innovation, Aulnay-sous-Bois</s1>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>France</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Strutton, G M" sort="Strutton, G M" uniqKey="Strutton G" first="G. M." last="Strutton">G. M. Strutton</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Princess Alexandra Hospital</s1>
<s2>Brisbane, Qld.</s2>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Australie</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Fourtanier, A" sort="Fourtanier, A" uniqKey="Fourtanier A" first="A." last="Fourtanier">A. Fourtanier</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="04">
<s1>L'Oréal Recherche</s1>
<s2>Clichy</s2>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>France</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Green, A C" sort="Green, A C" uniqKey="Green A" first="A. C." last="Green">A. C. Green</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Cancer and Populations Studies, Queensland Institute of Medical Research</s1>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Royaume-Uni</country>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="05">
<s1>University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre</s1>
<s2>Manchester</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Royaume-Uni</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Dermatology : (Basel)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Dermatology : (Basel)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1018-8665</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2011">2011</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<title level="j" type="main">Dermatology : (Basel)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Dermatology : (Basel)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1018-8665</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Australia</term>
<term>Comparative study</term>
<term>Dermatology</term>
<term>Elastosis</term>
<term>Skin</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Elastose</term>
<term>Etude comparative</term>
<term>Peau</term>
<term>Australie</term>
<term>Dermatologie</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="geographic" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Australie</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Background: Dermal elastosis is considered the histological 'gold standard' for evaluation of skin photoaging, but the relation of the level of dermal elastosis to other histological indicators of photoaging is not clear. Objective: To investigate how various proposed histological measures of photoaging compare with the level of dermal elastosis. Methods: Prospective, community-based study in Southeast Queensland, Australia, among 89 participants aged 40-82 years. Quantitative histology was used to evaluate 8 biomarkers of photoaged skin, and associations between grades of dermal elastosis and each of the other 7 biomarkers were analysed using ordinal logistic regression models with proportional odds assumption, using histological grades of elastosis as the outcome. Results: Older age, male sex and high outdoor exposure levels were confirmed as predictors of high levels of dermal elastosis. After adjustment for age and sex, the only significant positive association with increasing elastosis grades was the proportion of p53-positive cells. Epidermal thickness, interdigitation index proportion of surface covered with melanin (% Fontana-Masson staining) and glycosaminoglycan content were not associated with elastosis in either crude or adjusted models. Conclusions: Among a range of suggested biomarkers of photoaged skin, only p53-positive cells appear to be strongly associated with the level of dermal elastosis.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist>
<standard h6="B">
<pA>
<fA01 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>1018-8665</s0>
</fA01>
<fA03 i2="1">
<s0>Dermatology : (Basel)</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05>
<s2>223</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06>
<s2>2</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Comparison of Histological Measures of Skin Photoaging</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>HUGHES (M. C.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1">
<s1>BREDOUX (C.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1">
<s1>SALAS (F.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1">
<s1>LOMBARD (D.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1">
<s1>STRUTTON (G. M.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="06" i2="1">
<s1>FOURTANIER (A.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="07" i2="1">
<s1>GREEN (A. C.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Cancer and Populations Studies, Queensland Institute of Medical Research</s1>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Princess Alexandra Hospital</s1>
<s2>Brisbane, Qld.</s2>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="03">
<s1>L'Oréal Research and Innovation, Aulnay-sous-Bois</s1>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="04">
<s1>L'Oréal Recherche</s1>
<s2>Clichy</s2>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="05">
<s1>University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre</s1>
<s2>Manchester</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20>
<s1>140-151</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21>
<s1>2011</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01">
<s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01">
<s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>4530</s2>
<s5>354000507365380090</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44>
<s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2012 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45>
<s0>50 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>12-0018800</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60>
<s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61>
<s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>Dermatology : (Basel)</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01">
<s0>CHE</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG">
<s0>Background: Dermal elastosis is considered the histological 'gold standard' for evaluation of skin photoaging, but the relation of the level of dermal elastosis to other histological indicators of photoaging is not clear. Objective: To investigate how various proposed histological measures of photoaging compare with the level of dermal elastosis. Methods: Prospective, community-based study in Southeast Queensland, Australia, among 89 participants aged 40-82 years. Quantitative histology was used to evaluate 8 biomarkers of photoaged skin, and associations between grades of dermal elastosis and each of the other 7 biomarkers were analysed using ordinal logistic regression models with proportional odds assumption, using histological grades of elastosis as the outcome. Results: Older age, male sex and high outdoor exposure levels were confirmed as predictors of high levels of dermal elastosis. After adjustment for age and sex, the only significant positive association with increasing elastosis grades was the proportion of p53-positive cells. Epidermal thickness, interdigitation index proportion of surface covered with melanin (% Fontana-Masson staining) and glycosaminoglycan content were not associated with elastosis in either crude or adjusted models. Conclusions: Among a range of suggested biomarkers of photoaged skin, only p53-positive cells appear to be strongly associated with the level of dermal elastosis.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X">
<s0>002B08</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="X">
<s0>002B07</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Elastose</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Elastosis</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Elastosis</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Etude comparative</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Comparative study</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Estudio comparativo</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Peau</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Skin</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Piel</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Australie</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Australia</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Australia</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Dermatologie</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Dermatology</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Dermatología</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Océanie</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Oceania</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Oceania</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Pathologie de la peau</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Skin disease</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Piel patología</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Pathologie du tissu élastique</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Elastic tissue disease</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Tejido elástico patología</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21>
<s1>002</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01">
<s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82>
<s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Asie/explor/AustralieFrV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004777 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 004777 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Asie
   |area=    AustralieFrV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:12-0018800
   |texte=   Comparison of Histological Measures of Skin Photoaging
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33.
Data generation: Tue Dec 5 10:43:12 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 5 14:07:20 2024