Network analysis of a rock lobster quota lease market
Identifieur interne : 002048 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 002047; suivant : 002049Network analysis of a rock lobster quota lease market
Auteurs : Ingrid Van Putten ; Katell G. Hamon ; Caleb GardnerSource :
- Fisheries research [ 0165-7836 ] ; 2011.
Descripteurs français
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Individual Transferable Quota (ITQ) management systems are typically introduced to promote better capital utilisation by the fishing fleet and other efficiency gains. ITQ management was introduced in the Tasmanian rock lobster industry in 1998 and led to a range of economic, social and cultural changes including an increasing proportion of the catch taken by fishers dependent on quota leasing. Quota owners who lease out their entire quota increasingly dominated ownership of the fishery. Temporal changes in lease quota trade networks and network characteristics were analysed, which showed that the lease quota trade network has become more integrated and the influence of personal connections less important. Change in the network structure of the market indicated that a smaller number of quota owners have become increasingly dominant in this market although there was no evidence that this had an effect on quota lease prices. Processors also participated in the lease quota market and influenced interactions and dependencies. In other jurisdictions processor relationships have been found to affect lease quota price developments. However, disproportionate quota ownership by processors and market manipulation did not occur here. This was due to a successful input control where quota ownership by one legal entity was capped. Because market control cannot be gained through investment in quota, another logical way of gaining it would be for processors to operate as pseudo brokers and distribute lease quota for quota owners. Although processors in Tasmania operate as pseudo brokers, the absence of structural changes in the processor market indicated that this produced no change in market power or quota owner loyalties.
Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)
Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.
| pA |
|
|---|
Format Inist (serveur)
| NO : | PASCAL 11-0080158 INIST |
|---|---|
| ET : | Network analysis of a rock lobster quota lease market |
| AU : | VAN PUTTEN (Ingrid); HAMON (Katell G.); GARDNER (Caleb) |
| AF : | CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, CMAR, GPO Box 1538/Hobart, Tasmania 7001/Australie (1 aut., 2 aut.); Tasmanian Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 49/Tasmania 7001/Australie (2 aut., 3 aut.); IFREMER, UMR AMURE, Département d'économie maritime, BP 70/29280 Plouzané/France (2 aut.); Université Européenne de Bretagne, Université de Brest, UMR AMURE, IUEM, 12 rue de Kergoat, CS 93837/29238 Brest/France (2 aut.) |
| DT : | Publication en série; Niveau analytique |
| SO : | Fisheries research; ISSN 0165-7836; Coden FISRDJ; Pays-Bas; Da. 2011; Vol. 107; No. 1-3; Pp. 122-130; Bibl. 3/4 p. |
| LA : | Anglais |
| EA : | Individual Transferable Quota (ITQ) management systems are typically introduced to promote better capital utilisation by the fishing fleet and other efficiency gains. ITQ management was introduced in the Tasmanian rock lobster industry in 1998 and led to a range of economic, social and cultural changes including an increasing proportion of the catch taken by fishers dependent on quota leasing. Quota owners who lease out their entire quota increasingly dominated ownership of the fishery. Temporal changes in lease quota trade networks and network characteristics were analysed, which showed that the lease quota trade network has become more integrated and the influence of personal connections less important. Change in the network structure of the market indicated that a smaller number of quota owners have become increasingly dominant in this market although there was no evidence that this had an effect on quota lease prices. Processors also participated in the lease quota market and influenced interactions and dependencies. In other jurisdictions processor relationships have been found to affect lease quota price developments. However, disproportionate quota ownership by processors and market manipulation did not occur here. This was due to a successful input control where quota ownership by one legal entity was capped. Because market control cannot be gained through investment in quota, another logical way of gaining it would be for processors to operate as pseudo brokers and distribute lease quota for quota owners. Although processors in Tasmania operate as pseudo brokers, the absence of structural changes in the processor market indicated that this produced no change in market power or quota owner loyalties. |
| CC : | 002A14D03; 002A12H |
| FD : | Langouste; Quota; Marché; Pêcherie; Jasus |
| FG : | Macrura; Decapoda; Crustacea; Arthropoda; Invertebrata |
| ED : | Spiny lobster; Quota; Markets; Fishery |
| EG : | Macrura; Decapoda; Crustacea; Arthropoda; Invertebrata |
| SD : | Langosta; Mercado; Pesquería |
| LO : | INIST-19360.354000194577700130 |
| ID : | 11-0080158 |
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:11-0080158Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Network analysis of a rock lobster quota lease market</title><author><name sortKey="Van Putten, Ingrid" sort="Van Putten, Ingrid" uniqKey="Van Putten I" first="Ingrid" last="Van Putten">Ingrid Van Putten</name><affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, CMAR, GPO Box 1538</s1><s2>Hobart, Tasmania 7001</s2><s3>AUS</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ><sZ>2 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hamon, Katell G" sort="Hamon, Katell G" uniqKey="Hamon K" first="Katell G." last="Hamon">Katell G. Hamon</name><affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, CMAR, GPO Box 1538</s1><s2>Hobart, Tasmania 7001</s2><s3>AUS</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ><sZ>2 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14></affiliation><affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Tasmanian Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 49</s1><s2>Tasmania 7001</s2><s3>AUS</s3><sZ>2 aut.</sZ><sZ>3 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14></affiliation><affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>IFREMER, UMR AMURE, Département d'économie maritime, BP 70</s1><s2>29280 Plouzané</s2><s3>FRA</s3><sZ>2 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14></affiliation><affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="04"><s1>Université Européenne de Bretagne, Université de Brest, UMR AMURE, IUEM, 12 rue de Kergoat, CS 93837</s1><s2>29238 Brest</s2><s3>FRA</s3><sZ>2 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gardner, Caleb" sort="Gardner, Caleb" uniqKey="Gardner C" first="Caleb" last="Gardner">Caleb Gardner</name><affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Tasmanian Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 49</s1><s2>Tasmania 7001</s2><s3>AUS</s3><sZ>2 aut.</sZ><sZ>3 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno><idno type="inist">11-0080158</idno><date when="2011">2011</date><idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 11-0080158 INIST</idno><idno type="RBID">Pascal:11-0080158</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">002048</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Network analysis of a rock lobster quota lease market</title><author><name sortKey="Van Putten, Ingrid" sort="Van Putten, Ingrid" uniqKey="Van Putten I" first="Ingrid" last="Van Putten">Ingrid Van Putten</name><affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, CMAR, GPO Box 1538</s1><s2>Hobart, Tasmania 7001</s2><s3>AUS</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ><sZ>2 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hamon, Katell G" sort="Hamon, Katell G" uniqKey="Hamon K" first="Katell G." last="Hamon">Katell G. Hamon</name><affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, CMAR, GPO Box 1538</s1><s2>Hobart, Tasmania 7001</s2><s3>AUS</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ><sZ>2 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14></affiliation><affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Tasmanian Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 49</s1><s2>Tasmania 7001</s2><s3>AUS</s3><sZ>2 aut.</sZ><sZ>3 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14></affiliation><affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>IFREMER, UMR AMURE, Département d'économie maritime, BP 70</s1><s2>29280 Plouzané</s2><s3>FRA</s3><sZ>2 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14></affiliation><affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="04"><s1>Université Européenne de Bretagne, Université de Brest, UMR AMURE, IUEM, 12 rue de Kergoat, CS 93837</s1><s2>29238 Brest</s2><s3>FRA</s3><sZ>2 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gardner, Caleb" sort="Gardner, Caleb" uniqKey="Gardner C" first="Caleb" last="Gardner">Caleb Gardner</name><affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Tasmanian Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 49</s1><s2>Tasmania 7001</s2><s3>AUS</s3><sZ>2 aut.</sZ><sZ>3 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j" type="main">Fisheries research</title><title level="j" type="abbreviated">Fish. res.</title><idno type="ISSN">0165-7836</idno><imprint><date when="2011">2011</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Fisheries research</title><title level="j" type="abbreviated">Fish. res.</title><idno type="ISSN">0165-7836</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Fishery</term><term>Markets</term><term>Quota</term><term>Spiny lobster</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Langouste</term><term>Quota</term><term>Marché</term><term>Pêcherie</term><term>Jasus</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Individual Transferable Quota (ITQ) management systems are typically introduced to promote better capital utilisation by the fishing fleet and other efficiency gains. ITQ management was introduced in the Tasmanian rock lobster industry in 1998 and led to a range of economic, social and cultural changes including an increasing proportion of the catch taken by fishers dependent on quota leasing. Quota owners who lease out their entire quota increasingly dominated ownership of the fishery. Temporal changes in lease quota trade networks and network characteristics were analysed, which showed that the lease quota trade network has become more integrated and the influence of personal connections less important. Change in the network structure of the market indicated that a smaller number of quota owners have become increasingly dominant in this market although there was no evidence that this had an effect on quota lease prices. Processors also participated in the lease quota market and influenced interactions and dependencies. In other jurisdictions processor relationships have been found to affect lease quota price developments. However, disproportionate quota ownership by processors and market manipulation did not occur here. This was due to a successful input control where quota ownership by one legal entity was capped. Because market control cannot be gained through investment in quota, another logical way of gaining it would be for processors to operate as pseudo brokers and distribute lease quota for quota owners. Although processors in Tasmania operate as pseudo brokers, the absence of structural changes in the processor market indicated that this produced no change in market power or quota owner loyalties.</div></front></TEI><inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0165-7836</s0></fA01><fA02 i1="01"><s0>FISRDJ</s0></fA02><fA03 i2="1"><s0>Fish. res.</s0></fA03><fA05><s2>107</s2></fA05><fA06><s2>1-3</s2></fA06><fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Network analysis of a rock lobster quota lease market</s1></fA08><fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>VAN PUTTEN (Ingrid)</s1></fA11><fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>HAMON (Katell G.)</s1></fA11><fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>GARDNER (Caleb)</s1></fA11><fA14 i1="01"><s1>CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, CMAR, GPO Box 1538</s1><s2>Hobart, Tasmania 7001</s2><s3>AUS</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ><sZ>2 aut.</sZ></fA14><fA14 i1="02"><s1>Tasmanian Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 49</s1><s2>Tasmania 7001</s2><s3>AUS</s3><sZ>2 aut.</sZ><sZ>3 aut.</sZ></fA14><fA14 i1="03"><s1>IFREMER, UMR AMURE, Département d'économie maritime, BP 70</s1><s2>29280 Plouzané</s2><s3>FRA</s3><sZ>2 aut.</sZ></fA14><fA14 i1="04"><s1>Université Européenne de Bretagne, Université de Brest, UMR AMURE, IUEM, 12 rue de Kergoat, CS 93837</s1><s2>29238 Brest</s2><s3>FRA</s3><sZ>2 aut.</sZ></fA14><fA20><s1>122-130</s1></fA20><fA21><s1>2011</s1></fA21><fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0></fA23><fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1><s2>19360</s2><s5>354000194577700130</s5></fA43><fA44><s0>0000</s0><s1>© 2011 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1></fA44><fA45><s0>3/4 p.</s0></fA45><fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>11-0080158</s0></fA47><fA60><s1>P</s1></fA60><fA61><s0>A</s0></fA61><fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Fisheries research</s0></fA64><fA66 i1="01"><s0>NLD</s0></fA66><fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Individual Transferable Quota (ITQ) management systems are typically introduced to promote better capital utilisation by the fishing fleet and other efficiency gains. ITQ management was introduced in the Tasmanian rock lobster industry in 1998 and led to a range of economic, social and cultural changes including an increasing proportion of the catch taken by fishers dependent on quota leasing. Quota owners who lease out their entire quota increasingly dominated ownership of the fishery. Temporal changes in lease quota trade networks and network characteristics were analysed, which showed that the lease quota trade network has become more integrated and the influence of personal connections less important. Change in the network structure of the market indicated that a smaller number of quota owners have become increasingly dominant in this market although there was no evidence that this had an effect on quota lease prices. Processors also participated in the lease quota market and influenced interactions and dependencies. In other jurisdictions processor relationships have been found to affect lease quota price developments. However, disproportionate quota ownership by processors and market manipulation did not occur here. This was due to a successful input control where quota ownership by one legal entity was capped. Because market control cannot be gained through investment in quota, another logical way of gaining it would be for processors to operate as pseudo brokers and distribute lease quota for quota owners. Although processors in Tasmania operate as pseudo brokers, the absence of structural changes in the processor market indicated that this produced no change in market power or quota owner loyalties.</s0></fC01><fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002A14D03</s0></fC02><fC02 i1="02" i2="X"><s0>002A12H</s0></fC02><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Langouste</s0><s5>01</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Spiny lobster</s0><s5>01</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Langosta</s0><s5>01</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Quota</s0><s5>02</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Quota</s0><s5>02</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Marché</s0><s5>03</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Markets</s0><s5>03</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Mercado</s0><s5>03</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Pêcherie</s0><s5>04</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Fishery</s0><s5>04</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Pesquería</s0><s5>04</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Jasus</s0><s4>INC</s4><s5>64</s5></fC03><fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Macrura</s0><s2>NS</s2></fC07><fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Macrura</s0><s2>NS</s2></fC07><fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Macrura</s0><s2>NS</s2></fC07><fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Decapoda</s0><s2>NS</s2></fC07><fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Decapoda</s0><s2>NS</s2></fC07><fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Decapoda</s0><s2>NS</s2></fC07><fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Crustacea</s0><s2>NS</s2></fC07><fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Crustacea</s0><s2>NS</s2></fC07><fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Crustacea</s0><s2>NS</s2></fC07><fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Arthropoda</s0><s2>NS</s2></fC07><fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Arthropoda</s0><s2>NS</s2></fC07><fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Arthropoda</s0><s2>NS</s2></fC07><fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Invertebrata</s0><s2>NS</s2></fC07><fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Invertebrata</s0><s2>NS</s2></fC07><fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Invertebrata</s0><s2>NS</s2></fC07><fN21><s1>052</s1></fN21><fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1></fN44><fN82><s1>OTO</s1></fN82></pA></standard><server><NO>PASCAL 11-0080158 INIST</NO><ET>Network analysis of a rock lobster quota lease market</ET><AU>VAN PUTTEN (Ingrid); HAMON (Katell G.); GARDNER (Caleb)</AU><AF>CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, CMAR, GPO Box 1538/Hobart, Tasmania 7001/Australie (1 aut., 2 aut.); Tasmanian Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 49/Tasmania 7001/Australie (2 aut., 3 aut.); IFREMER, UMR AMURE, Département d'économie maritime, BP 70/29280 Plouzané/France (2 aut.); Université Européenne de Bretagne, Université de Brest, UMR AMURE, IUEM, 12 rue de Kergoat, CS 93837/29238 Brest/France (2 aut.)</AF><DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT><SO>Fisheries research; ISSN 0165-7836; Coden FISRDJ; Pays-Bas; Da. 2011; Vol. 107; No. 1-3; Pp. 122-130; Bibl. 3/4 p.</SO><LA>Anglais</LA><EA>Individual Transferable Quota (ITQ) management systems are typically introduced to promote better capital utilisation by the fishing fleet and other efficiency gains. ITQ management was introduced in the Tasmanian rock lobster industry in 1998 and led to a range of economic, social and cultural changes including an increasing proportion of the catch taken by fishers dependent on quota leasing. Quota owners who lease out their entire quota increasingly dominated ownership of the fishery. Temporal changes in lease quota trade networks and network characteristics were analysed, which showed that the lease quota trade network has become more integrated and the influence of personal connections less important. Change in the network structure of the market indicated that a smaller number of quota owners have become increasingly dominant in this market although there was no evidence that this had an effect on quota lease prices. Processors also participated in the lease quota market and influenced interactions and dependencies. In other jurisdictions processor relationships have been found to affect lease quota price developments. However, disproportionate quota ownership by processors and market manipulation did not occur here. This was due to a successful input control where quota ownership by one legal entity was capped. Because market control cannot be gained through investment in quota, another logical way of gaining it would be for processors to operate as pseudo brokers and distribute lease quota for quota owners. Although processors in Tasmania operate as pseudo brokers, the absence of structural changes in the processor market indicated that this produced no change in market power or quota owner loyalties.</EA><CC>002A14D03; 002A12H</CC><FD>Langouste; Quota; Marché; Pêcherie; Jasus</FD><FG>Macrura; Decapoda; Crustacea; Arthropoda; Invertebrata</FG><ED>Spiny lobster; Quota; Markets; Fishery</ED><EG>Macrura; Decapoda; Crustacea; Arthropoda; Invertebrata</EG><SD>Langosta; Mercado; Pesquería</SD><LO>INIST-19360.354000194577700130</LO><ID>11-0080158</ID></server></inist></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Asie/explor/AustralieFrV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002048 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002048 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Asie
|area= AustralieFrV1
|flux= PascalFrancis
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= Pascal:11-0080158
|texte= Network analysis of a rock lobster quota lease market
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |