AustralieFrV1, PascalFrancis, Corpus, bibRecord, 001C84

Influence of supporting media in suspension on membrane fouling reduction in submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR)

Identifieur interne : 001C84 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 001C83; suivant : 001C85

Influence of supporting media in suspension on membrane fouling reduction in submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR)

Auteurs : M. A. H. Johir ; R. Aryal ; S. Vigneswaran ; J. Kandasamy ; A. Grasmick

Source :

Journal of membrane science [ 0376-7388 ] ; 2011.

RBID : Pascal:11-0269724

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Suspension, Membrane, Encrassement, Réduction chimique, Réacteur membrane, Résistance, Masse moléculaire, Distribution, Filtration, Rétention, Charbon actif, Dimension particule, Air, Efficacité, Effluent, Aminoacide, Biopolymère, Acide humique, Acide fulvique, Adsorption, Mécanisme.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Activated carbon, Adsorption, Air, Aminoacid, Biopolymer, Chemical reduction, Distribution, Efficiency, Effluent, Filtration, Fouling, Fulvic acid, Humic acid, Mechanism, Membrane, Membrane reactor, Molecular mass, Particle size, Resistance, Retention, Suspension.

Abstract

In this study, the SMBR was compared in terms of membrane fouling with and without the addition of suspended medium in the membrane reactor. The effectiveness of medium in suspension in submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR) was evaluated at different filtration flux. The SMBR was operated at a flux of 5-30 L/m² h (corresponding hydraulic retention time of 10-1.7 h) with and without suspended medium. The suspended medium used in this study was granular activated carbon (GAC; particle size 300-600 mm) at air scouring (aeration) rates of 0.5-1.5 m³ m^-2 membrane area h^-1. At higher aeration rate of 1.5 m³/m² membrane area h, the effect of flux on membrane resistance was found to be negligible. The reduction of aeration rate from 1.5 to 1.0 m³ m^-2 membrane area h^-1 resulted in a sudden rise of TMP. The addition of suspended medium prevented a sudden rise of TMP (total membrane resistance reduced from 51 x 10¹¹ to 20 x 10" m^-1). The organic removal efficiency remained high irrespective of flux. The molecular weight distribution (MWD) and excitation emission matrix (EEM) analysis of SMBR effluent showed a range of organic (composed of amino acids, biopolymers, humics and fulvic acids type substances) removed by the GAC both by scouring and adsorption mechanisms.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 0376-7388`
A02	`01`			`@0 JMESDO`
A03		`1`		`@0 J. membr. sci.`
A05				`@2 374`
A06				`@2 1-2`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 Influence of supporting media in suspension on membrane fouling reduction in submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR)`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 JOHIR (M. A. H.)`
A11	`02`	`1`		`@1 ARYAL (R.)`
A11	`03`	`1`		`@1 VIGNESWARAN (S.)`
A11	`04`	`1`		`@1 KANDASAMY (J.)`
A11	`05`	`1`		`@1 GRASMICK (A.)`
A14	`01`			`@1 Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology @2 Sydney, Broadway, NSW 2007 @3 AUS @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut. @Z 3 aut. @Z 4 aut.`
A14	`02`			`@1 UMR Genie des Procédés Eau et Bioproduits (UMR-CIRAD 016), Université Montpellier II, CC005, Place Eugene Bataillon @2 34095 Montpellier @3 FRA @Z 5 aut.`
A20				`@1 121-128`
A21				`@1 2011`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 17232 @5 354000191580480130`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2011 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 23 ref.`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 11-0269724`
A60				`@1 P`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 Journal of membrane science`
A66	`01`			`@0 NLD`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 In this study, the SMBR was compared in terms of membrane fouling with and without the addition of suspended medium in the membrane reactor. The effectiveness of medium in suspension in submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR) was evaluated at different filtration flux. The SMBR was operated at a flux of 5-30 L/m² h (corresponding hydraulic retention time of 10-1.7 h) with and without suspended medium. The suspended medium used in this study was granular activated carbon (GAC; particle size 300-600 mm) at air scouring (aeration) rates of 0.5-1.5 m³ m^-2 membrane area h^-1. At higher aeration rate of 1.5 m³/m² membrane area h, the effect of flux on membrane resistance was found to be negligible. The reduction of aeration rate from 1.5 to 1.0 m³ m^-2 membrane area h^-1 resulted in a sudden rise of TMP. The addition of suspended medium prevented a sudden rise of TMP (total membrane resistance reduced from 51 x 10¹¹ to 20 x 10" m^-1). The organic removal efficiency remained high irrespective of flux. The molecular weight distribution (MWD) and excitation emission matrix (EEM) analysis of SMBR effluent showed a range of organic (composed of amino acids, biopolymers, humics and fulvic acids type substances) removed by the GAC both by scouring and adsorption mechanisms.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 001C01J09`
C02	`02`	`X`		`@0 001C01I06`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Suspension @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Suspension @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Suspensión @5 01`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Membrane @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Membrane @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Membrana @5 02`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Encrassement @5 03`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Fouling @5 03`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Enmugrecimiento @5 03`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Réduction chimique @5 04`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Chemical reduction @5 04`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Reducción química @5 04`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Réacteur membrane @5 05`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Membrane reactor @5 05`
C03	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Reactor membrana @5 05`
C03	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Résistance @5 06`
C03	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Resistance @5 06`
C03	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Resistencia @5 06`
C03	`07`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Masse moléculaire @5 07`
C03	`07`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Molecular mass @5 07`
C03	`07`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Masa molecular @5 07`
C03	`08`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Distribution @5 08`
C03	`08`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Distribution @5 08`
C03	`08`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Distribución @5 08`
C03	`09`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Filtration @5 09`
C03	`09`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Filtration @5 09`
C03	`09`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Filtración @5 09`
C03	`10`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Rétention @5 10`
C03	`10`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Retention @5 10`
C03	`10`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Retención @5 10`
C03	`11`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Charbon actif @5 11`
C03	`11`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Activated carbon @5 11`
C03	`11`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Carbón activado @5 11`
C03	`12`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Dimension particule @5 12`
C03	`12`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Particle size @5 12`
C03	`12`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Dimensión partícula @5 12`
C03	`13`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Air @5 13`
C03	`13`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Air @5 13`
C03	`13`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Aire @5 13`
C03	`14`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Efficacité @5 14`
C03	`14`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Efficiency @5 14`
C03	`14`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Eficacia @5 14`
C03	`15`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Effluent @5 15`
C03	`15`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Effluent @5 15`
C03	`15`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Efluente @5 15`
C03	`16`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Aminoacide @5 16`
C03	`16`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Aminoacid @5 16`
C03	`16`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Aminoácido @5 16`
C03	`17`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Biopolymère @5 17`
C03	`17`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Biopolymer @5 17`
C03	`17`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Biopolímero @5 17`
C03	`18`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Acide humique @2 NK @5 18`
C03	`18`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Humic acid @2 NK @5 18`
C03	`18`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Acido húmico @2 NK @5 18`
C03	`19`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Acide fulvique @2 NK @5 19`
C03	`19`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Fulvic acid @2 NK @5 19`
C03	`19`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Acido fúlvico @2 NK @5 19`
C03	`20`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Adsorption @5 20`
C03	`20`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Adsorption @5 20`
C03	`20`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Adsorción @5 20`
C03	`21`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Mécanisme @5 21`
C03	`21`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Mechanism @5 21`
C03	`21`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Mecanismo @5 21`
N21				`@1 178`
N44	`01`			`@1 OTO`
N82				`@1 OTO`

Format Inist (serveur)

NO :	PASCAL 11-0269724 INIST
ET :	Influence of supporting media in suspension on membrane fouling reduction in submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR)
AU :	JOHIR (M. A. H.); ARYAL (R.); VIGNESWARAN (S.); KANDASAMY (J.); GRASMICK (A.)
AF :	Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology/Sydney, Broadway, NSW 2007/Australie (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut.); UMR Genie des Procédés Eau et Bioproduits (UMR-CIRAD 016), Université Montpellier II, CC005, Place Eugene Bataillon/34095 Montpellier/France (5 aut.)
DT :	Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO :	Journal of membrane science; ISSN 0376-7388; Coden JMESDO; Pays-Bas; Da. 2011; Vol. 374; No. 1-2; Pp. 121-128; Bibl. 23 ref.
LA :	Anglais
EA :	In this study, the SMBR was compared in terms of membrane fouling with and without the addition of suspended medium in the membrane reactor. The effectiveness of medium in suspension in submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR) was evaluated at different filtration flux. The SMBR was operated at a flux of 5-30 L/m² h (corresponding hydraulic retention time of 10-1.7 h) with and without suspended medium. The suspended medium used in this study was granular activated carbon (GAC; particle size 300-600 mm) at air scouring (aeration) rates of 0.5-1.5 m³ m^-2 membrane area h^-1. At higher aeration rate of 1.5 m³/m² membrane area h, the effect of flux on membrane resistance was found to be negligible. The reduction of aeration rate from 1.5 to 1.0 m³ m^-2 membrane area h^-1 resulted in a sudden rise of TMP. The addition of suspended medium prevented a sudden rise of TMP (total membrane resistance reduced from 51 x 10¹¹ to 20 x 10" m^-1). The organic removal efficiency remained high irrespective of flux. The molecular weight distribution (MWD) and excitation emission matrix (EEM) analysis of SMBR effluent showed a range of organic (composed of amino acids, biopolymers, humics and fulvic acids type substances) removed by the GAC both by scouring and adsorption mechanisms.
CC :	001C01J09; 001C01I06
FD :	Suspension; Membrane; Encrassement; Réduction chimique; Réacteur membrane; Résistance; Masse moléculaire; Distribution; Filtration; Rétention; Charbon actif; Dimension particule; Air; Efficacité; Effluent; Aminoacide; Biopolymère; Acide humique; Acide fulvique; Adsorption; Mécanisme
ED :	Suspension; Membrane; Fouling; Chemical reduction; Membrane reactor; Resistance; Molecular mass; Distribution; Filtration; Retention; Activated carbon; Particle size; Air; Efficiency; Effluent; Aminoacid; Biopolymer; Humic acid; Fulvic acid; Adsorption; Mechanism
SD :	Suspensión; Membrana; Enmugrecimiento; Reducción química; Reactor membrana; Resistencia; Masa molecular; Distribución; Filtración; Retención; Carbón activado; Dimensión partícula; Aire; Eficacia; Efluente; Aminoácido; Biopolímero; Acido húmico; Acido fúlvico; Adsorción; Mecanismo
LO :	INIST-17232.354000191580480130
ID :	11-0269724

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:11-0269724

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Influence of supporting media in suspension on membrane fouling reduction in submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR)</title>
<author><name sortKey="Johir, M A H" sort="Johir, M A H" uniqKey="Johir M" first="M. A. H." last="Johir">M. A. H. Johir</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology</s1>
<s2>Sydney, Broadway, NSW 2007</s2>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Aryal, R" sort="Aryal, R" uniqKey="Aryal R" first="R." last="Aryal">R. Aryal</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology</s1>
<s2>Sydney, Broadway, NSW 2007</s2>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Vigneswaran, S" sort="Vigneswaran, S" uniqKey="Vigneswaran S" first="S." last="Vigneswaran">S. Vigneswaran</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology</s1>
<s2>Sydney, Broadway, NSW 2007</s2>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Kandasamy, J" sort="Kandasamy, J" uniqKey="Kandasamy J" first="J." last="Kandasamy">J. Kandasamy</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology</s1>
<s2>Sydney, Broadway, NSW 2007</s2>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Grasmick, A" sort="Grasmick, A" uniqKey="Grasmick A" first="A." last="Grasmick">A. Grasmick</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>UMR Genie des Procédés Eau et Bioproduits (UMR-CIRAD 016), Université Montpellier II, CC005, Place Eugene Bataillon</s1>
<s2>34095 Montpellier</s2>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">11-0269724</idno>
<date when="2011">2011</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 11-0269724 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:11-0269724</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">001C84</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Influence of supporting media in suspension on membrane fouling reduction in submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR)</title>
<author><name sortKey="Johir, M A H" sort="Johir, M A H" uniqKey="Johir M" first="M. A. H." last="Johir">M. A. H. Johir</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology</s1>
<s2>Sydney, Broadway, NSW 2007</s2>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Aryal, R" sort="Aryal, R" uniqKey="Aryal R" first="R." last="Aryal">R. Aryal</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology</s1>
<s2>Sydney, Broadway, NSW 2007</s2>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Vigneswaran, S" sort="Vigneswaran, S" uniqKey="Vigneswaran S" first="S." last="Vigneswaran">S. Vigneswaran</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology</s1>
<s2>Sydney, Broadway, NSW 2007</s2>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Kandasamy, J" sort="Kandasamy, J" uniqKey="Kandasamy J" first="J." last="Kandasamy">J. Kandasamy</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology</s1>
<s2>Sydney, Broadway, NSW 2007</s2>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Grasmick, A" sort="Grasmick, A" uniqKey="Grasmick A" first="A." last="Grasmick">A. Grasmick</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>UMR Genie des Procédés Eau et Bioproduits (UMR-CIRAD 016), Université Montpellier II, CC005, Place Eugene Bataillon</s1>
<s2>34095 Montpellier</s2>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of membrane science</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. membr. sci.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0376-7388</idno>
<imprint><date when="2011">2011</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Journal of membrane science</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. membr. sci.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0376-7388</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Activated carbon</term>
<term>Adsorption</term>
<term>Air</term>
<term>Aminoacid</term>
<term>Biopolymer</term>
<term>Chemical reduction</term>
<term>Distribution</term>
<term>Efficiency</term>
<term>Effluent</term>
<term>Filtration</term>
<term>Fouling</term>
<term>Fulvic acid</term>
<term>Humic acid</term>
<term>Mechanism</term>
<term>Membrane</term>
<term>Membrane reactor</term>
<term>Molecular mass</term>
<term>Particle size</term>
<term>Resistance</term>
<term>Retention</term>
<term>Suspension</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Suspension</term>
<term>Membrane</term>
<term>Encrassement</term>
<term>Réduction chimique</term>
<term>Réacteur membrane</term>
<term>Résistance</term>
<term>Masse moléculaire</term>
<term>Distribution</term>
<term>Filtration</term>
<term>Rétention</term>
<term>Charbon actif</term>
<term>Dimension particule</term>
<term>Air</term>
<term>Efficacité</term>
<term>Effluent</term>
<term>Aminoacide</term>
<term>Biopolymère</term>
<term>Acide humique</term>
<term>Acide fulvique</term>
<term>Adsorption</term>
<term>Mécanisme</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">In this study, the SMBR was compared in terms of membrane fouling with and without the addition of suspended medium in the membrane reactor. The effectiveness of medium in suspension in submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR) was evaluated at different filtration flux. The SMBR was operated at a flux of 5-30 L/m<sup>2</sup>
 h (corresponding hydraulic retention time of 10-1.7 h) with and without suspended medium. The suspended medium used in this study was granular activated carbon (GAC; particle size 300-600 mm) at air scouring (aeration) rates of 0.5-1.5 m<sup>3</sup>
 m<sup>-2</sup>
 membrane area h<sup>-1</sup>
. At higher aeration rate of 1.5 m<sup>3</sup>
/m<sup>2</sup>
 membrane area h, the effect of flux on membrane resistance was found to be negligible. The reduction of aeration rate from 1.5 to 1.0 m<sup>3</sup>
 m<sup>-2</sup>
 membrane area h<sup>-1</sup>
 resulted in a sudden rise of TMP. The addition of suspended medium prevented a sudden rise of TMP (total membrane resistance reduced from 51 x 10<sup>11</sup>
 to 20 x 10" m<sup>-1</sup>
). The organic removal efficiency remained high irrespective of flux. The molecular weight distribution (MWD) and excitation emission matrix (EEM) analysis of SMBR effluent showed a range of organic (composed of amino acids, biopolymers, humics and fulvic acids type substances) removed by the GAC both by scouring and adsorption mechanisms.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0376-7388</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>JMESDO</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>J. membr. sci.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>374</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>1-2</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Influence of supporting media in suspension on membrane fouling reduction in submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR)</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>JOHIR (M. A. H.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>ARYAL (R.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>VIGNESWARAN (S.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>KANDASAMY (J.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1"><s1>GRASMICK (A.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology</s1>
<s2>Sydney, Broadway, NSW 2007</s2>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>UMR Genie des Procédés Eau et Bioproduits (UMR-CIRAD 016), Université Montpellier II, CC005, Place Eugene Bataillon</s1>
<s2>34095 Montpellier</s2>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>121-128</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2011</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>17232</s2>
<s5>354000191580480130</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2011 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>23 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>11-0269724</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Journal of membrane science</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>NLD</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>In this study, the SMBR was compared in terms of membrane fouling with and without the addition of suspended medium in the membrane reactor. The effectiveness of medium in suspension in submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR) was evaluated at different filtration flux. The SMBR was operated at a flux of 5-30 L/m<sup>2</sup>
 h (corresponding hydraulic retention time of 10-1.7 h) with and without suspended medium. The suspended medium used in this study was granular activated carbon (GAC; particle size 300-600 mm) at air scouring (aeration) rates of 0.5-1.5 m<sup>3</sup>
 m<sup>-2</sup>
 membrane area h<sup>-1</sup>
. At higher aeration rate of 1.5 m<sup>3</sup>
/m<sup>2</sup>
 membrane area h, the effect of flux on membrane resistance was found to be negligible. The reduction of aeration rate from 1.5 to 1.0 m<sup>3</sup>
 m<sup>-2</sup>
 membrane area h<sup>-1</sup>
 resulted in a sudden rise of TMP. The addition of suspended medium prevented a sudden rise of TMP (total membrane resistance reduced from 51 x 10<sup>11</sup>
 to 20 x 10" m<sup>-1</sup>
). The organic removal efficiency remained high irrespective of flux. The molecular weight distribution (MWD) and excitation emission matrix (EEM) analysis of SMBR effluent showed a range of organic (composed of amino acids, biopolymers, humics and fulvic acids type substances) removed by the GAC both by scouring and adsorption mechanisms.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>001C01J09</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="X"><s0>001C01I06</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Suspension</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Suspension</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Suspensión</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Membrane</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Membrane</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Membrana</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Encrassement</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Fouling</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Enmugrecimiento</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Réduction chimique</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Chemical reduction</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Reducción química</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Réacteur membrane</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Membrane reactor</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Reactor membrana</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Résistance</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Resistance</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Resistencia</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Masse moléculaire</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Molecular mass</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Masa molecular</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Distribution</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Distribution</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Distribución</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Filtration</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Filtration</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Filtración</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Rétention</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Retention</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Retención</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Charbon actif</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Activated carbon</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Carbón activado</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Dimension particule</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Particle size</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Dimensión partícula</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Air</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Air</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Aire</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Efficacité</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Efficiency</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Eficacia</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="15" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Effluent</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="15" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Effluent</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="15" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Efluente</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="16" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Aminoacide</s0>
<s5>16</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="16" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Aminoacid</s0>
<s5>16</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="16" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Aminoácido</s0>
<s5>16</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="17" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Biopolymère</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="17" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Biopolymer</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="17" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Biopolímero</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="18" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Acide humique</s0>
<s2>NK</s2>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="18" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Humic acid</s0>
<s2>NK</s2>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="18" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Acido húmico</s0>
<s2>NK</s2>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="19" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Acide fulvique</s0>
<s2>NK</s2>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="19" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Fulvic acid</s0>
<s2>NK</s2>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="19" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Acido fúlvico</s0>
<s2>NK</s2>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="20" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Adsorption</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="20" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Adsorption</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="20" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Adsorción</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="21" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Mécanisme</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="21" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Mechanism</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="21" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Mecanismo</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21><s1>178</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 11-0269724 INIST</NO>
<ET>Influence of supporting media in suspension on membrane fouling reduction in submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR)</ET>
<AU>JOHIR (M. A. H.); ARYAL (R.); VIGNESWARAN (S.); KANDASAMY (J.); GRASMICK (A.)</AU>
<AF>Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology/Sydney, Broadway, NSW 2007/Australie (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut.); UMR Genie des Procédés Eau et Bioproduits (UMR-CIRAD 016), Université Montpellier II, CC005, Place Eugene Bataillon/34095 Montpellier/France (5 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Journal of membrane science; ISSN 0376-7388; Coden JMESDO; Pays-Bas; Da. 2011; Vol. 374; No. 1-2; Pp. 121-128; Bibl. 23 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>In this study, the SMBR was compared in terms of membrane fouling with and without the addition of suspended medium in the membrane reactor. The effectiveness of medium in suspension in submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR) was evaluated at different filtration flux. The SMBR was operated at a flux of 5-30 L/m<sup>2</sup>
 h (corresponding hydraulic retention time of 10-1.7 h) with and without suspended medium. The suspended medium used in this study was granular activated carbon (GAC; particle size 300-600 mm) at air scouring (aeration) rates of 0.5-1.5 m<sup>3</sup>
 m<sup>-2</sup>
 membrane area h<sup>-1</sup>
. At higher aeration rate of 1.5 m<sup>3</sup>
/m<sup>2</sup>
 membrane area h, the effect of flux on membrane resistance was found to be negligible. The reduction of aeration rate from 1.5 to 1.0 m<sup>3</sup>
 m<sup>-2</sup>
 membrane area h<sup>-1</sup>
 resulted in a sudden rise of TMP. The addition of suspended medium prevented a sudden rise of TMP (total membrane resistance reduced from 51 x 10<sup>11</sup>
 to 20 x 10" m<sup>-1</sup>
). The organic removal efficiency remained high irrespective of flux. The molecular weight distribution (MWD) and excitation emission matrix (EEM) analysis of SMBR effluent showed a range of organic (composed of amino acids, biopolymers, humics and fulvic acids type substances) removed by the GAC both by scouring and adsorption mechanisms.</EA>
<CC>001C01J09; 001C01I06</CC>
<FD>Suspension; Membrane; Encrassement; Réduction chimique; Réacteur membrane; Résistance; Masse moléculaire; Distribution; Filtration; Rétention; Charbon actif; Dimension particule; Air; Efficacité; Effluent; Aminoacide; Biopolymère; Acide humique; Acide fulvique; Adsorption; Mécanisme</FD>
<ED>Suspension; Membrane; Fouling; Chemical reduction; Membrane reactor; Resistance; Molecular mass; Distribution; Filtration; Retention; Activated carbon; Particle size; Air; Efficiency; Effluent; Aminoacid; Biopolymer; Humic acid; Fulvic acid; Adsorption; Mechanism</ED>
<SD>Suspensión; Membrana; Enmugrecimiento; Reducción química; Reactor membrana; Resistencia; Masa molecular; Distribución; Filtración; Retención; Carbón activado; Dimensión partícula; Aire; Eficacia; Efluente; Aminoácido; Biopolímero; Acido húmico; Acido fúlvico; Adsorción; Mecanismo</SD>
<LO>INIST-17232.354000191580480130</LO>
<ID>11-0269724</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Asie/explor/AustralieFrV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001C84 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001C84 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Asie
   |area=    AustralieFrV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:11-0269724
   |texte=   Influence of supporting media in suspension on membrane fouling reduction in submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR)
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33.
Data generation: Tue Dec 5 10:43:12 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 5 14:07:20 2024

	Serveur d'exploration sur les relations entre la France et l'Australie
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur les relations entre la France et l'Australie

Influence of supporting media in suspension on membrane fouling reduction in submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR)

Influence of supporting media in suspension on membrane fouling reduction in submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR)

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Format Inist (serveur)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri