Serveur d'exploration sur les relations entre la France et l'Australie

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

A reassessment of stress-induced "analgesia" in the rat using an unbiased method

Identifieur interne : 000F61 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000F60; suivant : 000F62

A reassessment of stress-induced "analgesia" in the rat using an unbiased method

Auteurs : Pascal Carrive ; Maxim Churyukanov ; Daniel Le Bars

Source :

RBID : Pascal:12-0389043

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

An increased tail-flick latency to noxious heat during or after stress in the rodent is usually interpreted as a stress-induced reduction in pain sensitivity and often described as a form of stress-induced "analgesia." However, this measure is an indirect and flawed measure of the change in nociceptive threshold to noxious heat. A major confound of the latency measure is the initial temperature of the tail, which can drop down to room temperature during stress, the consequence of a marked sympathetically mediated vasoconstriction in the skin of the extremities. We addressed this issue with tail-flick tests during contextual fear using infrared thermography to monitor temperature changes and a CO2 laser to deliver the heat stimulus. The experiment revealed a 4.2°C increase of the nociceptive threshold, confirming a true antin-ociceptive effect. However, its contribution to the increased withdrawal latency was less than two-thirds (63.2%). Nearly one-third (32.2%) was due to the drop in tail temperature (4.4°C), which also slowed conduction along sensory fibers (2.2%, included in the 32.2%). The remaining 4.6% was due to an increase in decisional/motor latency. This new unbiased method establishes beyond doubt that a conditioned stress response is associated with true antinociception to noxious heat. It also confirms that stress-induced changes in skin temperature can be a major confound in tail-flick tests. The present study shows, for the first time, the exact contribution of these two components of the tail-flick latency for a stress response.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

pA  
A01 01  1    @0 0304-3959
A02 01      @0 PAINDB
A03   1    @0 Pain : (Amst.)
A05       @2 152
A06       @2 3
A08 01  1  ENG  @1 A reassessment of stress-induced "analgesia" in the rat using an unbiased method
A11 01  1    @1 CARRIVE (Pascal)
A11 02  1    @1 CHURYUKANOV (Maxim)
A11 03  1    @1 LE BARS (Daniel)
A14 01      @1 School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales @2 NSW 2052 @3 AUS @Z 1 aut.
A14 02      @1 Department of Neurology, Moscow Medical Academy @2 Moscow 119021 @3 RUS @Z 2 aut.
A14 03      @1 Team "Pain", INSERM UMRS 975, CNRS UMR 7225, Faculté de Médecine UPMC, Université Pierre et Marie Curie @2 Paris @3 FRA @Z 3 aut.
A20       @1 676-686
A21       @1 2011
A23 01      @0 ENG
A43 01      @1 INIST @2 17241 @5 354000193693550310
A44       @0 0000 @1 © 2012 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.
A45       @0 62 ref.
A47 01  1    @0 12-0389043
A60       @1 P @3 PR
A61       @0 A
A64 01  1    @0 Pain : (Amsterdam)
A66 01      @0 NLD
C01 01    ENG  @0 An increased tail-flick latency to noxious heat during or after stress in the rodent is usually interpreted as a stress-induced reduction in pain sensitivity and often described as a form of stress-induced "analgesia." However, this measure is an indirect and flawed measure of the change in nociceptive threshold to noxious heat. A major confound of the latency measure is the initial temperature of the tail, which can drop down to room temperature during stress, the consequence of a marked sympathetically mediated vasoconstriction in the skin of the extremities. We addressed this issue with tail-flick tests during contextual fear using infrared thermography to monitor temperature changes and a CO2 laser to deliver the heat stimulus. The experiment revealed a 4.2°C increase of the nociceptive threshold, confirming a true antin-ociceptive effect. However, its contribution to the increased withdrawal latency was less than two-thirds (63.2%). Nearly one-third (32.2%) was due to the drop in tail temperature (4.4°C), which also slowed conduction along sensory fibers (2.2%, included in the 32.2%). The remaining 4.6% was due to an increase in decisional/motor latency. This new unbiased method establishes beyond doubt that a conditioned stress response is associated with true antinociception to noxious heat. It also confirms that stress-induced changes in skin temperature can be a major confound in tail-flick tests. The present study shows, for the first time, the exact contribution of these two components of the tail-flick latency for a stress response.
C02 01  X    @0 002A25F
C03 01  X  FRE  @0 Stress @5 01
C03 01  X  ENG  @0 Stress @5 01
C03 01  X  SPA  @0 Estrés @5 01
C03 02  X  FRE  @0 Analgésie @5 02
C03 02  X  ENG  @0 Analgesia @5 02
C03 02  X  SPA  @0 Analgesia @5 02
C03 03  X  FRE  @0 Peur @5 03
C03 03  X  ENG  @0 Fear @5 03
C03 03  X  SPA  @0 Miedo @5 03
C03 04  X  FRE  @0 Peau @5 04
C03 04  X  ENG  @0 Skin @5 04
C03 04  X  SPA  @0 Piel @5 04
C03 05  X  FRE  @0 Vasoconstriction @5 05
C03 05  X  ENG  @0 Vasoconstriction @5 05
C03 05  X  SPA  @0 Vasoconstricción @5 05
C03 06  X  FRE  @0 Chaleur @5 06
C03 06  X  ENG  @0 Heat @5 06
C03 06  X  SPA  @0 Calor @5 06
C03 07  X  FRE  @0 Douleur @5 07
C03 07  X  ENG  @0 Pain @5 07
C03 07  X  SPA  @0 Dolor @5 07
C03 08  X  FRE  @0 Rat @5 54
C03 08  X  ENG  @0 Rat @5 54
C03 08  X  SPA  @0 Rata @5 54
C03 09  X  FRE  @0 Animal @5 69
C03 09  X  ENG  @0 Animal @5 69
C03 09  X  SPA  @0 Animal @5 69
C07 01  X  FRE  @0 Vasomotricité @5 20
C07 01  X  ENG  @0 Vasomotricity @5 20
C07 01  X  SPA  @0 Vasomotricidad @5 20
C07 02  X  FRE  @0 Facteur milieu @5 21
C07 02  X  ENG  @0 Environmental factor @5 21
C07 02  X  SPA  @0 Factor medio @5 21
C07 03  X  FRE  @0 Température @5 22
C07 03  X  ENG  @0 Temperature @5 22
C07 03  X  SPA  @0 Temperatura @5 22
C07 04  X  FRE  @0 Rodentia @2 NS
C07 04  X  ENG  @0 Rodentia @2 NS
C07 04  X  SPA  @0 Rodentia @2 NS
C07 05  X  FRE  @0 Mammalia @2 NS
C07 05  X  ENG  @0 Mammalia @2 NS
C07 05  X  SPA  @0 Mammalia @2 NS
C07 06  X  FRE  @0 Vertebrata @2 NS
C07 06  X  ENG  @0 Vertebrata @2 NS
C07 06  X  SPA  @0 Vertebrata @2 NS
N21       @1 303
N44 01      @1 OTO
N82       @1 OTO

Format Inist (serveur)

NO : PASCAL 12-0389043 INIST
ET : A reassessment of stress-induced "analgesia" in the rat using an unbiased method
AU : CARRIVE (Pascal); CHURYUKANOV (Maxim); LE BARS (Daniel)
AF : School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales/NSW 2052/Australie (1 aut.); Department of Neurology, Moscow Medical Academy/Moscow 119021/Russie (2 aut.); Team "Pain", INSERM UMRS 975, CNRS UMR 7225, Faculté de Médecine UPMC, Université Pierre et Marie Curie/Paris/France (3 aut.)
DT : Publication en série; Papier de recherche; Niveau analytique
SO : Pain : (Amsterdam); ISSN 0304-3959; Coden PAINDB; Pays-Bas; Da. 2011; Vol. 152; No. 3; Pp. 676-686; Bibl. 62 ref.
LA : Anglais
EA : An increased tail-flick latency to noxious heat during or after stress in the rodent is usually interpreted as a stress-induced reduction in pain sensitivity and often described as a form of stress-induced "analgesia." However, this measure is an indirect and flawed measure of the change in nociceptive threshold to noxious heat. A major confound of the latency measure is the initial temperature of the tail, which can drop down to room temperature during stress, the consequence of a marked sympathetically mediated vasoconstriction in the skin of the extremities. We addressed this issue with tail-flick tests during contextual fear using infrared thermography to monitor temperature changes and a CO2 laser to deliver the heat stimulus. The experiment revealed a 4.2°C increase of the nociceptive threshold, confirming a true antin-ociceptive effect. However, its contribution to the increased withdrawal latency was less than two-thirds (63.2%). Nearly one-third (32.2%) was due to the drop in tail temperature (4.4°C), which also slowed conduction along sensory fibers (2.2%, included in the 32.2%). The remaining 4.6% was due to an increase in decisional/motor latency. This new unbiased method establishes beyond doubt that a conditioned stress response is associated with true antinociception to noxious heat. It also confirms that stress-induced changes in skin temperature can be a major confound in tail-flick tests. The present study shows, for the first time, the exact contribution of these two components of the tail-flick latency for a stress response.
CC : 002A25F
FD : Stress; Analgésie; Peur; Peau; Vasoconstriction; Chaleur; Douleur; Rat; Animal
FG : Vasomotricité; Facteur milieu; Température; Rodentia; Mammalia; Vertebrata
ED : Stress; Analgesia; Fear; Skin; Vasoconstriction; Heat; Pain; Rat; Animal
EG : Vasomotricity; Environmental factor; Temperature; Rodentia; Mammalia; Vertebrata
SD : Estrés; Analgesia; Miedo; Piel; Vasoconstricción; Calor; Dolor; Rata; Animal
LO : INIST-17241.354000193693550310
ID : 12-0389043

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:12-0389043

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">A reassessment of stress-induced "analgesia" in the rat using an unbiased method</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Carrive, Pascal" sort="Carrive, Pascal" uniqKey="Carrive P" first="Pascal" last="Carrive">Pascal Carrive</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales</s1>
<s2>NSW 2052</s2>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Churyukanov, Maxim" sort="Churyukanov, Maxim" uniqKey="Churyukanov M" first="Maxim" last="Churyukanov">Maxim Churyukanov</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Department of Neurology, Moscow Medical Academy</s1>
<s2>Moscow 119021</s2>
<s3>RUS</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Le Bars, Daniel" sort="Le Bars, Daniel" uniqKey="Le Bars D" first="Daniel" last="Le Bars">Daniel Le Bars</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="03">
<s1>Team "Pain", INSERM UMRS 975, CNRS UMR 7225, Faculté de Médecine UPMC, Université Pierre et Marie Curie</s1>
<s2>Paris</s2>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">12-0389043</idno>
<date when="2011">2011</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 12-0389043 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:12-0389043</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000F61</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">A reassessment of stress-induced "analgesia" in the rat using an unbiased method</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Carrive, Pascal" sort="Carrive, Pascal" uniqKey="Carrive P" first="Pascal" last="Carrive">Pascal Carrive</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales</s1>
<s2>NSW 2052</s2>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Churyukanov, Maxim" sort="Churyukanov, Maxim" uniqKey="Churyukanov M" first="Maxim" last="Churyukanov">Maxim Churyukanov</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Department of Neurology, Moscow Medical Academy</s1>
<s2>Moscow 119021</s2>
<s3>RUS</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Le Bars, Daniel" sort="Le Bars, Daniel" uniqKey="Le Bars D" first="Daniel" last="Le Bars">Daniel Le Bars</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="03">
<s1>Team "Pain", INSERM UMRS 975, CNRS UMR 7225, Faculté de Médecine UPMC, Université Pierre et Marie Curie</s1>
<s2>Paris</s2>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Pain : (Amsterdam)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Pain : (Amst.)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0304-3959</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2011">2011</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<title level="j" type="main">Pain : (Amsterdam)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Pain : (Amst.)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0304-3959</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Analgesia</term>
<term>Animal</term>
<term>Fear</term>
<term>Heat</term>
<term>Pain</term>
<term>Rat</term>
<term>Skin</term>
<term>Stress</term>
<term>Vasoconstriction</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Stress</term>
<term>Analgésie</term>
<term>Peur</term>
<term>Peau</term>
<term>Vasoconstriction</term>
<term>Chaleur</term>
<term>Douleur</term>
<term>Rat</term>
<term>Animal</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">An increased tail-flick latency to noxious heat during or after stress in the rodent is usually interpreted as a stress-induced reduction in pain sensitivity and often described as a form of stress-induced "analgesia." However, this measure is an indirect and flawed measure of the change in nociceptive threshold to noxious heat. A major confound of the latency measure is the initial temperature of the tail, which can drop down to room temperature during stress, the consequence of a marked sympathetically mediated vasoconstriction in the skin of the extremities. We addressed this issue with tail-flick tests during contextual fear using infrared thermography to monitor temperature changes and a CO
<sub>2</sub>
laser to deliver the heat stimulus. The experiment revealed a 4.2°C increase of the nociceptive threshold, confirming a true antin-ociceptive effect. However, its contribution to the increased withdrawal latency was less than two-thirds (63.2%). Nearly one-third (32.2%) was due to the drop in tail temperature (4.4°C), which also slowed conduction along sensory fibers (2.2%, included in the 32.2%). The remaining 4.6% was due to an increase in decisional/motor latency. This new unbiased method establishes beyond doubt that a conditioned stress response is associated with true antinociception to noxious heat. It also confirms that stress-induced changes in skin temperature can be a major confound in tail-flick tests. The present study shows, for the first time, the exact contribution of these two components of the tail-flick latency for a stress response.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist>
<standard h6="B">
<pA>
<fA01 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>0304-3959</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01">
<s0>PAINDB</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1">
<s0>Pain : (Amst.)</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05>
<s2>152</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06>
<s2>3</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>A reassessment of stress-induced "analgesia" in the rat using an unbiased method</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>CARRIVE (Pascal)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1">
<s1>CHURYUKANOV (Maxim)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1">
<s1>LE BARS (Daniel)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01">
<s1>School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales</s1>
<s2>NSW 2052</s2>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Department of Neurology, Moscow Medical Academy</s1>
<s2>Moscow 119021</s2>
<s3>RUS</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="03">
<s1>Team "Pain", INSERM UMRS 975, CNRS UMR 7225, Faculté de Médecine UPMC, Université Pierre et Marie Curie</s1>
<s2>Paris</s2>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20>
<s1>676-686</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21>
<s1>2011</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01">
<s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01">
<s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>17241</s2>
<s5>354000193693550310</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44>
<s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2012 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45>
<s0>62 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>12-0389043</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60>
<s1>P</s1>
<s3>PR</s3>
</fA60>
<fA61>
<s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>Pain : (Amsterdam)</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01">
<s0>NLD</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG">
<s0>An increased tail-flick latency to noxious heat during or after stress in the rodent is usually interpreted as a stress-induced reduction in pain sensitivity and often described as a form of stress-induced "analgesia." However, this measure is an indirect and flawed measure of the change in nociceptive threshold to noxious heat. A major confound of the latency measure is the initial temperature of the tail, which can drop down to room temperature during stress, the consequence of a marked sympathetically mediated vasoconstriction in the skin of the extremities. We addressed this issue with tail-flick tests during contextual fear using infrared thermography to monitor temperature changes and a CO
<sub>2</sub>
laser to deliver the heat stimulus. The experiment revealed a 4.2°C increase of the nociceptive threshold, confirming a true antin-ociceptive effect. However, its contribution to the increased withdrawal latency was less than two-thirds (63.2%). Nearly one-third (32.2%) was due to the drop in tail temperature (4.4°C), which also slowed conduction along sensory fibers (2.2%, included in the 32.2%). The remaining 4.6% was due to an increase in decisional/motor latency. This new unbiased method establishes beyond doubt that a conditioned stress response is associated with true antinociception to noxious heat. It also confirms that stress-induced changes in skin temperature can be a major confound in tail-flick tests. The present study shows, for the first time, the exact contribution of these two components of the tail-flick latency for a stress response.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X">
<s0>002A25F</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Stress</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Stress</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Estrés</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Analgésie</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Analgesia</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Analgesia</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Peur</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Fear</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Miedo</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Peau</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Skin</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Piel</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Vasoconstriction</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Vasoconstriction</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Vasoconstricción</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Chaleur</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Heat</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Calor</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Douleur</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Pain</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Dolor</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Rat</s0>
<s5>54</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Rat</s0>
<s5>54</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Rata</s0>
<s5>54</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Animal</s0>
<s5>69</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Animal</s0>
<s5>69</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Animal</s0>
<s5>69</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Vasomotricité</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Vasomotricity</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Vasomotricidad</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Facteur milieu</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Environmental factor</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Factor medio</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Température</s0>
<s5>22</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Temperature</s0>
<s5>22</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Temperatura</s0>
<s5>22</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Rodentia</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Rodentia</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Rodentia</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Mammalia</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Mammalia</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Mammalia</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Vertebrata</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Vertebrata</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Vertebrata</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fN21>
<s1>303</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01">
<s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82>
<s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server>
<NO>PASCAL 12-0389043 INIST</NO>
<ET>A reassessment of stress-induced "analgesia" in the rat using an unbiased method</ET>
<AU>CARRIVE (Pascal); CHURYUKANOV (Maxim); LE BARS (Daniel)</AU>
<AF>School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales/NSW 2052/Australie (1 aut.); Department of Neurology, Moscow Medical Academy/Moscow 119021/Russie (2 aut.); Team "Pain", INSERM UMRS 975, CNRS UMR 7225, Faculté de Médecine UPMC, Université Pierre et Marie Curie/Paris/France (3 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Papier de recherche; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Pain : (Amsterdam); ISSN 0304-3959; Coden PAINDB; Pays-Bas; Da. 2011; Vol. 152; No. 3; Pp. 676-686; Bibl. 62 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>An increased tail-flick latency to noxious heat during or after stress in the rodent is usually interpreted as a stress-induced reduction in pain sensitivity and often described as a form of stress-induced "analgesia." However, this measure is an indirect and flawed measure of the change in nociceptive threshold to noxious heat. A major confound of the latency measure is the initial temperature of the tail, which can drop down to room temperature during stress, the consequence of a marked sympathetically mediated vasoconstriction in the skin of the extremities. We addressed this issue with tail-flick tests during contextual fear using infrared thermography to monitor temperature changes and a CO
<sub>2</sub>
laser to deliver the heat stimulus. The experiment revealed a 4.2°C increase of the nociceptive threshold, confirming a true antin-ociceptive effect. However, its contribution to the increased withdrawal latency was less than two-thirds (63.2%). Nearly one-third (32.2%) was due to the drop in tail temperature (4.4°C), which also slowed conduction along sensory fibers (2.2%, included in the 32.2%). The remaining 4.6% was due to an increase in decisional/motor latency. This new unbiased method establishes beyond doubt that a conditioned stress response is associated with true antinociception to noxious heat. It also confirms that stress-induced changes in skin temperature can be a major confound in tail-flick tests. The present study shows, for the first time, the exact contribution of these two components of the tail-flick latency for a stress response.</EA>
<CC>002A25F</CC>
<FD>Stress; Analgésie; Peur; Peau; Vasoconstriction; Chaleur; Douleur; Rat; Animal</FD>
<FG>Vasomotricité; Facteur milieu; Température; Rodentia; Mammalia; Vertebrata</FG>
<ED>Stress; Analgesia; Fear; Skin; Vasoconstriction; Heat; Pain; Rat; Animal</ED>
<EG>Vasomotricity; Environmental factor; Temperature; Rodentia; Mammalia; Vertebrata</EG>
<SD>Estrés; Analgesia; Miedo; Piel; Vasoconstricción; Calor; Dolor; Rata; Animal</SD>
<LO>INIST-17241.354000193693550310</LO>
<ID>12-0389043</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Asie/explor/AustralieFrV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000F61 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000F61 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Asie
   |area=    AustralieFrV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:12-0389043
   |texte=   A reassessment of stress-induced "analgesia" in the rat using an unbiased method
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33.
Data generation: Tue Dec 5 10:43:12 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 5 14:07:20 2024