A reassessment of stress-induced "analgesia" in the rat using an unbiased method
Identifieur interne : 000F61 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000F60; suivant : 000F62A reassessment of stress-induced "analgesia" in the rat using an unbiased method
Auteurs : Pascal Carrive ; Maxim Churyukanov ; Daniel Le BarsSource :
- Pain : (Amsterdam) [ 0304-3959 ] ; 2011.
Descripteurs français
English descriptors
Abstract
An increased tail-flick latency to noxious heat during or after stress in the rodent is usually interpreted as a stress-induced reduction in pain sensitivity and often described as a form of stress-induced "analgesia." However, this measure is an indirect and flawed measure of the change in nociceptive threshold to noxious heat. A major confound of the latency measure is the initial temperature of the tail, which can drop down to room temperature during stress, the consequence of a marked sympathetically mediated vasoconstriction in the skin of the extremities. We addressed this issue with tail-flick tests during contextual fear using infrared thermography to monitor temperature changes and a CO2 laser to deliver the heat stimulus. The experiment revealed a 4.2°C increase of the nociceptive threshold, confirming a true antin-ociceptive effect. However, its contribution to the increased withdrawal latency was less than two-thirds (63.2%). Nearly one-third (32.2%) was due to the drop in tail temperature (4.4°C), which also slowed conduction along sensory fibers (2.2%, included in the 32.2%). The remaining 4.6% was due to an increase in decisional/motor latency. This new unbiased method establishes beyond doubt that a conditioned stress response is associated with true antinociception to noxious heat. It also confirms that stress-induced changes in skin temperature can be a major confound in tail-flick tests. The present study shows, for the first time, the exact contribution of these two components of the tail-flick latency for a stress response.
Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)
Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.
pA |
|
---|
Format Inist (serveur)
NO : | PASCAL 12-0389043 INIST |
---|---|
ET : | A reassessment of stress-induced "analgesia" in the rat using an unbiased method |
AU : | CARRIVE (Pascal); CHURYUKANOV (Maxim); LE BARS (Daniel) |
AF : | School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales/NSW 2052/Australie (1 aut.); Department of Neurology, Moscow Medical Academy/Moscow 119021/Russie (2 aut.); Team "Pain", INSERM UMRS 975, CNRS UMR 7225, Faculté de Médecine UPMC, Université Pierre et Marie Curie/Paris/France (3 aut.) |
DT : | Publication en série; Papier de recherche; Niveau analytique |
SO : | Pain : (Amsterdam); ISSN 0304-3959; Coden PAINDB; Pays-Bas; Da. 2011; Vol. 152; No. 3; Pp. 676-686; Bibl. 62 ref. |
LA : | Anglais |
EA : | An increased tail-flick latency to noxious heat during or after stress in the rodent is usually interpreted as a stress-induced reduction in pain sensitivity and often described as a form of stress-induced "analgesia." However, this measure is an indirect and flawed measure of the change in nociceptive threshold to noxious heat. A major confound of the latency measure is the initial temperature of the tail, which can drop down to room temperature during stress, the consequence of a marked sympathetically mediated vasoconstriction in the skin of the extremities. We addressed this issue with tail-flick tests during contextual fear using infrared thermography to monitor temperature changes and a CO2 laser to deliver the heat stimulus. The experiment revealed a 4.2°C increase of the nociceptive threshold, confirming a true antin-ociceptive effect. However, its contribution to the increased withdrawal latency was less than two-thirds (63.2%). Nearly one-third (32.2%) was due to the drop in tail temperature (4.4°C), which also slowed conduction along sensory fibers (2.2%, included in the 32.2%). The remaining 4.6% was due to an increase in decisional/motor latency. This new unbiased method establishes beyond doubt that a conditioned stress response is associated with true antinociception to noxious heat. It also confirms that stress-induced changes in skin temperature can be a major confound in tail-flick tests. The present study shows, for the first time, the exact contribution of these two components of the tail-flick latency for a stress response. |
CC : | 002A25F |
FD : | Stress; Analgésie; Peur; Peau; Vasoconstriction; Chaleur; Douleur; Rat; Animal |
FG : | Vasomotricité; Facteur milieu; Température; Rodentia; Mammalia; Vertebrata |
ED : | Stress; Analgesia; Fear; Skin; Vasoconstriction; Heat; Pain; Rat; Animal |
EG : | Vasomotricity; Environmental factor; Temperature; Rodentia; Mammalia; Vertebrata |
SD : | Estrés; Analgesia; Miedo; Piel; Vasoconstricción; Calor; Dolor; Rata; Animal |
LO : | INIST-17241.354000193693550310 |
ID : | 12-0389043 |
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:12-0389043Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">A reassessment of stress-induced "analgesia" in the rat using an unbiased method</title>
<author><name sortKey="Carrive, Pascal" sort="Carrive, Pascal" uniqKey="Carrive P" first="Pascal" last="Carrive">Pascal Carrive</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales</s1>
<s2>NSW 2052</s2>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Churyukanov, Maxim" sort="Churyukanov, Maxim" uniqKey="Churyukanov M" first="Maxim" last="Churyukanov">Maxim Churyukanov</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Neurology, Moscow Medical Academy</s1>
<s2>Moscow 119021</s2>
<s3>RUS</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Le Bars, Daniel" sort="Le Bars, Daniel" uniqKey="Le Bars D" first="Daniel" last="Le Bars">Daniel Le Bars</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Team "Pain", INSERM UMRS 975, CNRS UMR 7225, Faculté de Médecine UPMC, Université Pierre et Marie Curie</s1>
<s2>Paris</s2>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">12-0389043</idno>
<date when="2011">2011</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 12-0389043 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:12-0389043</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000F61</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">A reassessment of stress-induced "analgesia" in the rat using an unbiased method</title>
<author><name sortKey="Carrive, Pascal" sort="Carrive, Pascal" uniqKey="Carrive P" first="Pascal" last="Carrive">Pascal Carrive</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales</s1>
<s2>NSW 2052</s2>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Churyukanov, Maxim" sort="Churyukanov, Maxim" uniqKey="Churyukanov M" first="Maxim" last="Churyukanov">Maxim Churyukanov</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Neurology, Moscow Medical Academy</s1>
<s2>Moscow 119021</s2>
<s3>RUS</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Le Bars, Daniel" sort="Le Bars, Daniel" uniqKey="Le Bars D" first="Daniel" last="Le Bars">Daniel Le Bars</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Team "Pain", INSERM UMRS 975, CNRS UMR 7225, Faculté de Médecine UPMC, Université Pierre et Marie Curie</s1>
<s2>Paris</s2>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Pain : (Amsterdam)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Pain : (Amst.)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0304-3959</idno>
<imprint><date when="2011">2011</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Pain : (Amsterdam)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Pain : (Amst.)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0304-3959</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Analgesia</term>
<term>Animal</term>
<term>Fear</term>
<term>Heat</term>
<term>Pain</term>
<term>Rat</term>
<term>Skin</term>
<term>Stress</term>
<term>Vasoconstriction</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Stress</term>
<term>Analgésie</term>
<term>Peur</term>
<term>Peau</term>
<term>Vasoconstriction</term>
<term>Chaleur</term>
<term>Douleur</term>
<term>Rat</term>
<term>Animal</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">An increased tail-flick latency to noxious heat during or after stress in the rodent is usually interpreted as a stress-induced reduction in pain sensitivity and often described as a form of stress-induced "analgesia." However, this measure is an indirect and flawed measure of the change in nociceptive threshold to noxious heat. A major confound of the latency measure is the initial temperature of the tail, which can drop down to room temperature during stress, the consequence of a marked sympathetically mediated vasoconstriction in the skin of the extremities. We addressed this issue with tail-flick tests during contextual fear using infrared thermography to monitor temperature changes and a CO<sub>2</sub>
laser to deliver the heat stimulus. The experiment revealed a 4.2°C increase of the nociceptive threshold, confirming a true antin-ociceptive effect. However, its contribution to the increased withdrawal latency was less than two-thirds (63.2%). Nearly one-third (32.2%) was due to the drop in tail temperature (4.4°C), which also slowed conduction along sensory fibers (2.2%, included in the 32.2%). The remaining 4.6% was due to an increase in decisional/motor latency. This new unbiased method establishes beyond doubt that a conditioned stress response is associated with true antinociception to noxious heat. It also confirms that stress-induced changes in skin temperature can be a major confound in tail-flick tests. The present study shows, for the first time, the exact contribution of these two components of the tail-flick latency for a stress response.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0304-3959</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>PAINDB</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Pain : (Amst.)</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>152</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>3</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>A reassessment of stress-induced "analgesia" in the rat using an unbiased method</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>CARRIVE (Pascal)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>CHURYUKANOV (Maxim)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>LE BARS (Daniel)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales</s1>
<s2>NSW 2052</s2>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Neurology, Moscow Medical Academy</s1>
<s2>Moscow 119021</s2>
<s3>RUS</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="03"><s1>Team "Pain", INSERM UMRS 975, CNRS UMR 7225, Faculté de Médecine UPMC, Université Pierre et Marie Curie</s1>
<s2>Paris</s2>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>676-686</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2011</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>17241</s2>
<s5>354000193693550310</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2012 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>62 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>12-0389043</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
<s3>PR</s3>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Pain : (Amsterdam)</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>NLD</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>An increased tail-flick latency to noxious heat during or after stress in the rodent is usually interpreted as a stress-induced reduction in pain sensitivity and often described as a form of stress-induced "analgesia." However, this measure is an indirect and flawed measure of the change in nociceptive threshold to noxious heat. A major confound of the latency measure is the initial temperature of the tail, which can drop down to room temperature during stress, the consequence of a marked sympathetically mediated vasoconstriction in the skin of the extremities. We addressed this issue with tail-flick tests during contextual fear using infrared thermography to monitor temperature changes and a CO<sub>2</sub>
laser to deliver the heat stimulus. The experiment revealed a 4.2°C increase of the nociceptive threshold, confirming a true antin-ociceptive effect. However, its contribution to the increased withdrawal latency was less than two-thirds (63.2%). Nearly one-third (32.2%) was due to the drop in tail temperature (4.4°C), which also slowed conduction along sensory fibers (2.2%, included in the 32.2%). The remaining 4.6% was due to an increase in decisional/motor latency. This new unbiased method establishes beyond doubt that a conditioned stress response is associated with true antinociception to noxious heat. It also confirms that stress-induced changes in skin temperature can be a major confound in tail-flick tests. The present study shows, for the first time, the exact contribution of these two components of the tail-flick latency for a stress response.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002A25F</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Stress</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Stress</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estrés</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Analgésie</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Analgesia</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Analgesia</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Peur</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Fear</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Miedo</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Peau</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Skin</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Piel</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Vasoconstriction</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Vasoconstriction</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Vasoconstricción</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Chaleur</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Heat</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Calor</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Douleur</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Pain</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Dolor</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Rat</s0>
<s5>54</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Rat</s0>
<s5>54</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Rata</s0>
<s5>54</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Animal</s0>
<s5>69</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Animal</s0>
<s5>69</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Animal</s0>
<s5>69</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Vasomotricité</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Vasomotricity</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Vasomotricidad</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Facteur milieu</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Environmental factor</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Factor medio</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Température</s0>
<s5>22</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Temperature</s0>
<s5>22</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Temperatura</s0>
<s5>22</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Rodentia</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Rodentia</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Rodentia</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Mammalia</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Mammalia</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Mammalia</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Vertebrata</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Vertebrata</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Vertebrata</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>303</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 12-0389043 INIST</NO>
<ET>A reassessment of stress-induced "analgesia" in the rat using an unbiased method</ET>
<AU>CARRIVE (Pascal); CHURYUKANOV (Maxim); LE BARS (Daniel)</AU>
<AF>School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales/NSW 2052/Australie (1 aut.); Department of Neurology, Moscow Medical Academy/Moscow 119021/Russie (2 aut.); Team "Pain", INSERM UMRS 975, CNRS UMR 7225, Faculté de Médecine UPMC, Université Pierre et Marie Curie/Paris/France (3 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Papier de recherche; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Pain : (Amsterdam); ISSN 0304-3959; Coden PAINDB; Pays-Bas; Da. 2011; Vol. 152; No. 3; Pp. 676-686; Bibl. 62 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>An increased tail-flick latency to noxious heat during or after stress in the rodent is usually interpreted as a stress-induced reduction in pain sensitivity and often described as a form of stress-induced "analgesia." However, this measure is an indirect and flawed measure of the change in nociceptive threshold to noxious heat. A major confound of the latency measure is the initial temperature of the tail, which can drop down to room temperature during stress, the consequence of a marked sympathetically mediated vasoconstriction in the skin of the extremities. We addressed this issue with tail-flick tests during contextual fear using infrared thermography to monitor temperature changes and a CO<sub>2</sub>
laser to deliver the heat stimulus. The experiment revealed a 4.2°C increase of the nociceptive threshold, confirming a true antin-ociceptive effect. However, its contribution to the increased withdrawal latency was less than two-thirds (63.2%). Nearly one-third (32.2%) was due to the drop in tail temperature (4.4°C), which also slowed conduction along sensory fibers (2.2%, included in the 32.2%). The remaining 4.6% was due to an increase in decisional/motor latency. This new unbiased method establishes beyond doubt that a conditioned stress response is associated with true antinociception to noxious heat. It also confirms that stress-induced changes in skin temperature can be a major confound in tail-flick tests. The present study shows, for the first time, the exact contribution of these two components of the tail-flick latency for a stress response.</EA>
<CC>002A25F</CC>
<FD>Stress; Analgésie; Peur; Peau; Vasoconstriction; Chaleur; Douleur; Rat; Animal</FD>
<FG>Vasomotricité; Facteur milieu; Température; Rodentia; Mammalia; Vertebrata</FG>
<ED>Stress; Analgesia; Fear; Skin; Vasoconstriction; Heat; Pain; Rat; Animal</ED>
<EG>Vasomotricity; Environmental factor; Temperature; Rodentia; Mammalia; Vertebrata</EG>
<SD>Estrés; Analgesia; Miedo; Piel; Vasoconstricción; Calor; Dolor; Rata; Animal</SD>
<LO>INIST-17241.354000193693550310</LO>
<ID>12-0389043</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Asie/explor/AustralieFrV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000F61 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000F61 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Asie |area= AustralieFrV1 |flux= PascalFrancis |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= Pascal:12-0389043 |texte= A reassessment of stress-induced "analgesia" in the rat using an unbiased method }}
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. | ![]() |