Serveur d'exploration sur les relations entre la France et l'Australie

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Two Neo-Darwinisms

Identifieur interne : 001F07 ( PascalFrancis/Checkpoint ); précédent : 001F06; suivant : 001F08

Two Neo-Darwinisms

Auteurs : Denis M. Walsh [Canada]

Source :

RBID : Francis:11-0401857

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

There are two extant theories of evolution, each of which deserves the honourific "neo-Darwinism": Modern Synthesis Replicator theory and a theory I shall call Developmental Darwinism. The principal difference concerns the canonical unit of biological organization. Modern Synthesis replicator theory explains the process of evolution by appeal to the activities of genes or replicators. Developmental Darwinism explains the process of evolution by appeal to the capacities of organisms. In particular, it is the plasticity of organisms, manifested most distinctly during development, that causes adaptive evolution. Despite the fact that each, in its own way, traces its origin to the theory outlined by Darwin, they are radically different. The objectives of this essay are twofold: to underscore the differences between these theories, and to argue that Developmental Darwinism, though nascent, is a viable alternative to Modem Synthesis replicator theory.


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

Francis:11-0401857

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Two Neo-Darwinisms</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Walsh, Denis M" sort="Walsh, Denis M" uniqKey="Walsh D" first="Denis M." last="Walsh">Denis M. Walsh</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Philosophy and Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology The University of Toronto 91 Charles Street West</s1>
<s2>Toronto, ON M5K 1J7</s2>
<s3>CAN</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Canada</country>
<wicri:noRegion>Department of Philosophy and Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology The University of Toronto 91 Charles Street West</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">11-0401857</idno>
<date when="2010">2010</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">FRANCIS 11-0401857 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Francis:11-0401857</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">002197</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Curation">004579</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Checkpoint">001F07</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PascalFrancis" wicri:step="Checkpoint">001F07</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Two Neo-Darwinisms</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Walsh, Denis M" sort="Walsh, Denis M" uniqKey="Walsh D" first="Denis M." last="Walsh">Denis M. Walsh</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Philosophy and Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology The University of Toronto 91 Charles Street West</s1>
<s2>Toronto, ON M5K 1J7</s2>
<s3>CAN</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Canada</country>
<wicri:noRegion>Department of Philosophy and Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology The University of Toronto 91 Charles Street West</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">History and philosophy of the life sciences</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Hist. philos. life sci.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0391-9714</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2010">2010</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<title level="j" type="main">History and philosophy of the life sciences</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Hist. philos. life sci.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0391-9714</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Development</term>
<term>Modern evolutionary synthesis</term>
<term>Neodarwinism</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Néodarwinisme</term>
<term>Développement</term>
<term>Plasticité</term>
<term>Héritage</term>
<term>Darwinisme développemental</term>
<term>Espace génotypique</term>
<term>Espace phénotypique</term>
<term>Réplicateur</term>
<term>Théorie synthétique de l'évolution</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Héritage</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">There are two extant theories of evolution, each of which deserves the honourific "neo-Darwinism": Modern Synthesis Replicator theory and a theory I shall call Developmental Darwinism. The principal difference concerns the canonical unit of biological organization. Modern Synthesis replicator theory explains the process of evolution by appeal to the activities of genes or replicators. Developmental Darwinism explains the process of evolution by appeal to the capacities of organisms. In particular, it is the plasticity of organisms, manifested most distinctly during development, that causes adaptive evolution. Despite the fact that each, in its own way, traces its origin to the theory outlined by Darwin, they are radically different. The objectives of this essay are twofold: to underscore the differences between these theories, and to argue that Developmental Darwinism, though nascent, is a viable alternative to Modem Synthesis replicator theory.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist>
<standard h6="B">
<pA>
<fA01 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>0391-9714</s0>
</fA01>
<fA03 i2="1">
<s0>Hist. philos. life sci.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05>
<s2>32</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06>
<s2>2-3</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Two Neo-Darwinisms</s1>
</fA08>
<fA09 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>The Concept of Organism: Historical, Philosophical, Scientific Perspectives</s1>
</fA09>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>WALSH (Denis M.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA12 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>HUNEMAN (Philippe)</s1>
<s9>ed.</s9>
</fA12>
<fA12 i1="02" i2="1">
<s1>WOLFE (Charles T.)</s1>
<s9>ed.</s9>
</fA12>
<fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Philosophy and Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology The University of Toronto 91 Charles Street West</s1>
<s2>Toronto, ON M5K 1J7</s2>
<s3>CAN</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA15 i1="01">
<s1>Institut d'Histoire et de Philosophie des Sciences et des Techniques, CNRS / Université Paris I Sorbonne, IHPST 13, rue du Four</s1>
<s2>75006 Paris</s2>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA15>
<fA15 i1="02">
<s1>Unit for History and Philosophy of Science, University of Sydney, 437 Carslaw F07</s1>
<s2>Sydney, NSW 2006</s2>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA15>
<fA20>
<s1>317-339</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21>
<s1>2010</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01">
<s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01">
<s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>24533</s2>
<s5>354000194100190070</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44>
<s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2011 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45>
<s0>2 p.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>11-0401857</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60>
<s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61>
<s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>History and philosophy of the life sciences</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01">
<s0>ITA</s0>
</fA66>
<fA68 i1="01" i2="1" l="FRE">
<s1>Deux néo-darwinismes</s1>
</fA68>
<fA69 i1="01" i2="1" l="FRE">
<s1>Le concept d'organisme : perspectives historiques, philosophiques et scientifiques</s1>
</fA69>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG">
<s0>There are two extant theories of evolution, each of which deserves the honourific "neo-Darwinism": Modern Synthesis Replicator theory and a theory I shall call Developmental Darwinism. The principal difference concerns the canonical unit of biological organization. Modern Synthesis replicator theory explains the process of evolution by appeal to the activities of genes or replicators. Developmental Darwinism explains the process of evolution by appeal to the capacities of organisms. In particular, it is the plasticity of organisms, manifested most distinctly during development, that causes adaptive evolution. Despite the fact that each, in its own way, traces its origin to the theory outlined by Darwin, they are radically different. The objectives of this essay are twofold: to underscore the differences between these theories, and to argue that Developmental Darwinism, though nascent, is a viable alternative to Modem Synthesis replicator theory.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="T">
<s0>522363</s0>
<s1>VI</s1>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="T">
<s0>522</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="T" l="FRE">
<s0>Néodarwinisme</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="T" l="ENG">
<s0>Neodarwinism</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="T" l="SPA">
<s0>Neodarwinismo</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="P" l="FRE">
<s0>Développement</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="P" l="ENG">
<s0>Development</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="T" l="FRE">
<s0>Plasticité</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>31</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="T" l="FRE">
<s0>Héritage</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>32</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="T" l="FRE">
<s0>Darwinisme développemental</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>33</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="T" l="FRE">
<s0>Espace génotypique</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>34</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="T" l="FRE">
<s0>Espace phénotypique</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>35</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="T" l="FRE">
<s0>Réplicateur</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>36</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="T" l="FRE">
<s0>Théorie synthétique de l'évolution</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="T" l="ENG">
<s0>Modern evolutionary synthesis</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="T" l="SPA">
<s0>Síntesis evolutiva moderna</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21>
<s1>276</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
</inist>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>Canada</li>
</country>
</list>
<tree>
<country name="Canada">
<noRegion>
<name sortKey="Walsh, Denis M" sort="Walsh, Denis M" uniqKey="Walsh D" first="Denis M." last="Walsh">Denis M. Walsh</name>
</noRegion>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Asie/explor/AustralieFrV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001F07 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 001F07 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Asie
   |area=    AustralieFrV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Checkpoint
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Francis:11-0401857
   |texte=   Two Neo-Darwinisms
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33.
Data generation: Tue Dec 5 10:43:12 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 5 14:07:20 2024