No more problems in Coltheart's neighborhood: resolving neighborhood conflicts in the lexical decision task
Identifieur interne : 002633 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 002632; suivant : 002634No more problems in Coltheart's neighborhood: resolving neighborhood conflicts in the lexical decision task
Auteurs : Johannes C. Ziegler ; Conrad PerrySource :
- Cognition [ 0010-0277 ] ; 1998.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Andrews, Body neighbors, Carreiras, Cognition, Coltheart, Dominant role, Elsevier science, Error data, Error rates, Experimental psychology, Experimental trials, Facilitatory, Facilitatory effects, Facilitatory nature, Facilitatory neighborhood effects, Facilitatory neighborhood size effects, Forster, Grainger, Greater sensitivity, Higher frequency neighbors, Human perception, Inhibitory, Inhibitory effect, Inhibitory effects, Inhibitory nature, Inhibitory neighborhood effects, Item analysis, Jacobs, Latency, Letter neighbors, Lexical, Lexical access, Lexical decision, Lexical decision latencies, Lexical decision task, Lexical inhibition principle, Lexical retrieval, Lexical similarity, Many body neighbors, Many letter neighbors, Many neighbors, Mental lexicon, Neighbor, Neighborhood density effects, Neighborhood effects, Neighborhood frequency, Neighborhood frequency effect, Neighborhood frequency effects, Neighborhood size, Neighborhood size effect, Nonword, Nonword latencies, Nonwords, Null effects, Orthographic, Orthographic neighbors, Orthographic space, Other sublexical unit, Perry cognition, Position coding, Present study, Psychological review, Reaction times, Sample trials, Special role, Stimulus characteristics, Strong facilitatory, Target word, Visual word recognition, Word frequency, Word recognition, Word representations, Word units, Words nonwords, Xation mark, Ziegler.
- Teeft :
- Andrews, Body neighbors, Carreiras, Cognition, Coltheart, Dominant role, Elsevier science, Error data, Error rates, Experimental psychology, Experimental trials, Facilitatory, Facilitatory effects, Facilitatory nature, Facilitatory neighborhood effects, Facilitatory neighborhood size effects, Forster, Grainger, Greater sensitivity, Higher frequency neighbors, Human perception, Inhibitory, Inhibitory effect, Inhibitory effects, Inhibitory nature, Inhibitory neighborhood effects, Item analysis, Jacobs, Latency, Letter neighbors, Lexical, Lexical access, Lexical decision, Lexical decision latencies, Lexical decision task, Lexical inhibition principle, Lexical retrieval, Lexical similarity, Many body neighbors, Many letter neighbors, Many neighbors, Mental lexicon, Neighbor, Neighborhood density effects, Neighborhood effects, Neighborhood frequency, Neighborhood frequency effect, Neighborhood frequency effects, Neighborhood size, Neighborhood size effect, Nonword, Nonword latencies, Nonwords, Null effects, Orthographic, Orthographic neighbors, Orthographic space, Other sublexical unit, Perry cognition, Position coding, Present study, Psychological review, Reaction times, Sample trials, Special role, Stimulus characteristics, Strong facilitatory, Target word, Visual word recognition, Word frequency, Word recognition, Word representations, Word units, Words nonwords, Xation mark, Ziegler.
Abstract
Abstract: In the area of visual word recognition, there is considerable disagreement as to whether neighborhood effects for words in the lexical decision task are facilitatory or inhibitory: While they seem to be mostly facilitatory in English, they tend to be absent or inhibitory in French or Spanish. The present study investigated the possibility that the facilitatory neighborhood effect obtained in English is due to the fact that most neighbors in English are body neighbors (i.e. they share the same orthographic rime). Our results showed that when words were matched for orthographic neighborhood (N), the effects of body neighbors (BN) were facilitatory (i.e. shorter reaction times for words with many body neighbors than for words with few body neighbors). In contrast, when words are matched for BN, the effects of N are unreliable with a tendency towards inhibition. In conclusion, it appears that research conducted in English has always found neighborhood effects to be facilitatory because of the dominant role of body neighbors in English. In contrast, neighborhood effects in French and Spanish may have been more ambiguous because these languages either do not confound N and BN, or they do not require a greater sensitivity to the body/rime unit.
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00047-X
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:CD748A8C598A0CD78B8D9371176885D24F84E188Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>No more problems in Coltheart's neighborhood: resolving neighborhood conflicts in the lexical decision task</title><author><name sortKey="C Ziegler, Johannes" sort="C Ziegler, Johannes" uniqKey="C Ziegler J" first="Johannes" last="C. Ziegler">Johannes C. Ziegler</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Behavioural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>CREPCO-CNRS, Aix-en-Provence, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Corresponding author. Tel.: +61 2 98506732; fax: +61 2 98508062; e-mail: jziegler@frogmouth.bhs.mq.edu.au</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Perry, Conrad" sort="Perry, Conrad" uniqKey="Perry C" first="Conrad" last="Perry">Conrad Perry</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Behavioural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:CD748A8C598A0CD78B8D9371176885D24F84E188</idno><date when="1998" year="1998">1998</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00047-X</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/CD748A8C598A0CD78B8D9371176885D24F84E188/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002633</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002633</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">No more problems in Coltheart's neighborhood: resolving neighborhood conflicts in the lexical decision task</title><author><name sortKey="C Ziegler, Johannes" sort="C Ziegler, Johannes" uniqKey="C Ziegler J" first="Johannes" last="C. Ziegler">Johannes C. Ziegler</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Behavioural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>CREPCO-CNRS, Aix-en-Provence, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Corresponding author. Tel.: +61 2 98506732; fax: +61 2 98508062; e-mail: jziegler@frogmouth.bhs.mq.edu.au</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Perry, Conrad" sort="Perry, Conrad" uniqKey="Perry C" first="Conrad" last="Perry">Conrad Perry</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Behavioural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Cognition</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">COGNIT</title><idno type="ISSN">0010-0277</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1998">1998</date><biblScope unit="volume">68</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="B53">B53</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="B62">B62</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0010-0277</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0010-0277</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Andrews</term><term>Body neighbors</term><term>Carreiras</term><term>Cognition</term><term>Coltheart</term><term>Dominant role</term><term>Elsevier science</term><term>Error data</term><term>Error rates</term><term>Experimental psychology</term><term>Experimental trials</term><term>Facilitatory</term><term>Facilitatory effects</term><term>Facilitatory nature</term><term>Facilitatory neighborhood effects</term><term>Facilitatory neighborhood size effects</term><term>Forster</term><term>Grainger</term><term>Greater sensitivity</term><term>Higher frequency neighbors</term><term>Human perception</term><term>Inhibitory</term><term>Inhibitory effect</term><term>Inhibitory effects</term><term>Inhibitory nature</term><term>Inhibitory neighborhood effects</term><term>Item analysis</term><term>Jacobs</term><term>Latency</term><term>Letter neighbors</term><term>Lexical</term><term>Lexical access</term><term>Lexical decision</term><term>Lexical decision latencies</term><term>Lexical decision task</term><term>Lexical inhibition principle</term><term>Lexical retrieval</term><term>Lexical similarity</term><term>Many body neighbors</term><term>Many letter neighbors</term><term>Many neighbors</term><term>Mental lexicon</term><term>Neighbor</term><term>Neighborhood density effects</term><term>Neighborhood effects</term><term>Neighborhood frequency</term><term>Neighborhood frequency effect</term><term>Neighborhood frequency effects</term><term>Neighborhood size</term><term>Neighborhood size effect</term><term>Nonword</term><term>Nonword latencies</term><term>Nonwords</term><term>Null effects</term><term>Orthographic</term><term>Orthographic neighbors</term><term>Orthographic space</term><term>Other sublexical unit</term><term>Perry cognition</term><term>Position coding</term><term>Present study</term><term>Psychological review</term><term>Reaction times</term><term>Sample trials</term><term>Special role</term><term>Stimulus characteristics</term><term>Strong facilitatory</term><term>Target word</term><term>Visual word recognition</term><term>Word frequency</term><term>Word recognition</term><term>Word representations</term><term>Word units</term><term>Words nonwords</term><term>Xation mark</term><term>Ziegler</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Andrews</term><term>Body neighbors</term><term>Carreiras</term><term>Cognition</term><term>Coltheart</term><term>Dominant role</term><term>Elsevier science</term><term>Error data</term><term>Error rates</term><term>Experimental psychology</term><term>Experimental trials</term><term>Facilitatory</term><term>Facilitatory effects</term><term>Facilitatory nature</term><term>Facilitatory neighborhood effects</term><term>Facilitatory neighborhood size effects</term><term>Forster</term><term>Grainger</term><term>Greater sensitivity</term><term>Higher frequency neighbors</term><term>Human perception</term><term>Inhibitory</term><term>Inhibitory effect</term><term>Inhibitory effects</term><term>Inhibitory nature</term><term>Inhibitory neighborhood effects</term><term>Item analysis</term><term>Jacobs</term><term>Latency</term><term>Letter neighbors</term><term>Lexical</term><term>Lexical access</term><term>Lexical decision</term><term>Lexical decision latencies</term><term>Lexical decision task</term><term>Lexical inhibition principle</term><term>Lexical retrieval</term><term>Lexical similarity</term><term>Many body neighbors</term><term>Many letter neighbors</term><term>Many neighbors</term><term>Mental lexicon</term><term>Neighbor</term><term>Neighborhood density effects</term><term>Neighborhood effects</term><term>Neighborhood frequency</term><term>Neighborhood frequency effect</term><term>Neighborhood frequency effects</term><term>Neighborhood size</term><term>Neighborhood size effect</term><term>Nonword</term><term>Nonword latencies</term><term>Nonwords</term><term>Null effects</term><term>Orthographic</term><term>Orthographic neighbors</term><term>Orthographic space</term><term>Other sublexical unit</term><term>Perry cognition</term><term>Position coding</term><term>Present study</term><term>Psychological review</term><term>Reaction times</term><term>Sample trials</term><term>Special role</term><term>Stimulus characteristics</term><term>Strong facilitatory</term><term>Target word</term><term>Visual word recognition</term><term>Word frequency</term><term>Word recognition</term><term>Word representations</term><term>Word units</term><term>Words nonwords</term><term>Xation mark</term><term>Ziegler</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Abstract: In the area of visual word recognition, there is considerable disagreement as to whether neighborhood effects for words in the lexical decision task are facilitatory or inhibitory: While they seem to be mostly facilitatory in English, they tend to be absent or inhibitory in French or Spanish. The present study investigated the possibility that the facilitatory neighborhood effect obtained in English is due to the fact that most neighbors in English are body neighbors (i.e. they share the same orthographic rime). Our results showed that when words were matched for orthographic neighborhood (N), the effects of body neighbors (BN) were facilitatory (i.e. shorter reaction times for words with many body neighbors than for words with few body neighbors). In contrast, when words are matched for BN, the effects of N are unreliable with a tendency towards inhibition. In conclusion, it appears that research conducted in English has always found neighborhood effects to be facilitatory because of the dominant role of body neighbors in English. In contrast, neighborhood effects in French and Spanish may have been more ambiguous because these languages either do not confound N and BN, or they do not require a greater sensitivity to the body/rime unit.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>elsevier</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>nonwords</json:string><json:string>body neighbors</json:string><json:string>facilitatory</json:string><json:string>cognition</json:string><json:string>neighborhood effects</json:string><json:string>grainger</json:string><json:string>latency</json:string><json:string>orthographic neighbors</json:string><json:string>ziegler</json:string><json:string>nonword</json:string><json:string>experimental psychology</json:string><json:string>visual word recognition</json:string><json:string>perry cognition</json:string><json:string>coltheart</json:string><json:string>lexical decision task</json:string><json:string>lexical</json:string><json:string>many body neighbors</json:string><json:string>carreiras</json:string><json:string>lexical decision latencies</json:string><json:string>forster</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>psychological review</json:string><json:string>inhibitory</json:string><json:string>nonword latencies</json:string><json:string>error rates</json:string><json:string>lexical decision</json:string><json:string>inhibitory effects</json:string><json:string>lexical access</json:string><json:string>orthographic</json:string><json:string>neighborhood frequency effects</json:string><json:string>human perception</json:string><json:string>strong facilitatory</json:string><json:string>word recognition</json:string><json:string>letter neighbors</json:string><json:string>mental lexicon</json:string><json:string>facilitatory neighborhood effects</json:string><json:string>facilitatory effects</json:string><json:string>greater sensitivity</json:string><json:string>lexical similarity</json:string><json:string>neighborhood frequency</json:string><json:string>jacobs</json:string><json:string>andrews</json:string><json:string>facilitatory nature</json:string><json:string>special role</json:string><json:string>higher frequency neighbors</json:string><json:string>neighborhood frequency effect</json:string><json:string>lexical inhibition principle</json:string><json:string>word representations</json:string><json:string>inhibitory effect</json:string><json:string>null effects</json:string><json:string>word frequency</json:string><json:string>facilitatory neighborhood size effects</json:string><json:string>stimulus characteristics</json:string><json:string>sample trials</json:string><json:string>experimental trials</json:string><json:string>xation mark</json:string><json:string>many letter neighbors</json:string><json:string>words nonwords</json:string><json:string>inhibitory neighborhood effects</json:string><json:string>error data</json:string><json:string>item analysis</json:string><json:string>other sublexical unit</json:string><json:string>inhibitory nature</json:string><json:string>many neighbors</json:string><json:string>neighborhood density effects</json:string><json:string>neighborhood size effect</json:string><json:string>orthographic space</json:string><json:string>target word</json:string><json:string>position coding</json:string><json:string>elsevier science</json:string><json:string>word units</json:string><json:string>dominant role</json:string><json:string>lexical retrieval</json:string><json:string>reaction times</json:string><json:string>neighborhood size</json:string><json:string>neighbor</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Johannes C. Ziegler</name><affiliations><json:string>School of Behavioural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</json:string><json:string>CREPCO-CNRS, Aix-en-Provence, France</json:string><json:string>Corresponding author. Tel.: +61 2 98506732; fax: +61 2 98508062; e-mail: jziegler@frogmouth.bhs.mq.edu.au</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Conrad Perry</name><affiliations><json:string>School of Behavioural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Neighborhood effects</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Body effects</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Visual word recognition</value></json:item></subject><arkIstex>ark:/67375/6H6-TRHZWG4W-X</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>Full-length article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Abstract: In the area of visual word recognition, there is considerable disagreement as to whether neighborhood effects for words in the lexical decision task are facilitatory or inhibitory: While they seem to be mostly facilitatory in English, they tend to be absent or inhibitory in French or Spanish. The present study investigated the possibility that the facilitatory neighborhood effect obtained in English is due to the fact that most neighbors in English are body neighbors (i.e. they share the same orthographic rime). Our results showed that when words were matched for orthographic neighborhood (N), the effects of body neighbors (BN) were facilitatory (i.e. shorter reaction times for words with many body neighbors than for words with few body neighbors). In contrast, when words are matched for BN, the effects of N are unreliable with a tendency towards inhibition. In conclusion, it appears that research conducted in English has always found neighborhood effects to be facilitatory because of the dominant role of body neighbors in English. In contrast, neighborhood effects in French and Spanish may have been more ambiguous because these languages either do not confound N and BN, or they do not require a greater sensitivity to the body/rime unit.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.626</score><pdfWordCount>4226</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>25967</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>10</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>540 x 743 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>200</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1267</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>3</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>No more problems in Coltheart's neighborhood: resolving neighborhood conflicts in the lexical decision task</title><pmid><json:string>9818513</json:string></pmid><pii><json:string>S0010-0277(98)00047-X</json:string></pii><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><host><title>Cognition</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><publicationDate>1998</publicationDate><issn><json:string>0010-0277</json:string></issn><pii><json:string>S0010-0277(00)X0040-6</json:string></pii><volume>68</volume><issue>2</issue><pages><first>B53</first><last>B62</last></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1998</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Macquarie University</json:string><json:string>France Received</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>C. Perry</json:string><json:string>C. Ziegler</json:string><json:string>Forster</json:string><json:string>J.C. Ziegler</json:string></persName><placeName></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Andrews, 1997</json:string><json:string>Carreiras et al., 1997</json:string><json:string>Grainger and Jacobs, 1996</json:string><json:string>Plaut et al. (1996)</json:string><json:string>Forster and Davis, 1991</json:string><json:string>for a detailed suggestion along this line see Taft, 1991</json:string><json:string>for a comprehensive review see Andrews, 1997</json:string><json:string>Perea and Pollatsek, 1998</json:string><json:string>Kucera and Francis (1967)</json:string><json:string>Grainger et al., 1989, 1992</json:string><json:string>Huntsman and Lima, 1996</json:string><json:string>Treiman et al., 1995</json:string><json:string>Bowey, 1990</json:string><json:string>Plaut et al., 1996</json:string><json:string>Ziegler et al. (1997)</json:string><json:string>McClelland and Rumelhart, 1981</json:string><json:string>Peereman and Content (1997)</json:string><json:string>Grainger, 1990</json:string><json:string>Andrews, 1989, 1992</json:string><json:string>lexical inhibition principle; see Grainger and Jacobs, 1996</json:string><json:string>Forster and Taft (1994)</json:string><json:string>Forster and Shen, 1996</json:string><json:string>see Peereman and Content, 1997</json:string><json:string>Andrews (1996)</json:string><json:string>Forster and Taft, 1994</json:string><json:string>see Grainger and Jacobs, 1996</json:string><json:string>Seidenberg and McClelland, 1989</json:string><json:string>Perea and Carreiras (1998)</json:string><json:string>Grainger and Jacobs (1996)</json:string><json:string>Sears et al., 1995</json:string><json:string>Coltheart et al., 1977</json:string><json:string>Andrews (1997)</json:string><json:string>Coltheart et al. (1993)</json:string><json:string>Coltheart et al., 1993</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/6H6-TRHZWG4W-X</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - social science</json:string><json:string>2 - psychology, experimental</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - psychology & cognitive sciences</json:string><json:string>3 - experimental psychology</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Life Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Neuroscience</json:string><json:string>3 - Cognitive Neuroscience</json:string><json:string>1 - Social Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Social Sciences</json:string><json:string>3 - Linguistics and Language</json:string><json:string>1 - Social Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Psychology</json:string><json:string>3 - Developmental and Educational Psychology</json:string><json:string>1 - Social Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Arts and Humanities</json:string><json:string>3 - Language and Linguistics</json:string><json:string>1 - Social Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Psychology</json:string><json:string>3 - Experimental and Cognitive Psychology</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences humaines et sociales</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>1998</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1998</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00047-X</json:string></doi><id>CD748A8C598A0CD78B8D9371176885D24F84E188</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/CD748A8C598A0CD78B8D9371176885D24F84E188/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/CD748A8C598A0CD78B8D9371176885D24F84E188/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/CD748A8C598A0CD78B8D9371176885D24F84E188/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a">No more problems in Coltheart's neighborhood: resolving neighborhood conflicts in the lexical decision task</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><availability><p>©1998 Elsevier Science B.V.</p></availability><date>1998</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content">Section title: Brief article</note><note type="content">Table 1: Stimulus characteristics for words and nonwords with few versus many body neighbors (BN) and with few versus many letter neighbors (N)</note><note type="content">Table 2: Mean lexical decision latencies and error rates for words and nonwords with few versus many body neighbors (BN) and with few versus many letter neighbors (N)</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a">No more problems in Coltheart's neighborhood: resolving neighborhood conflicts in the lexical decision task</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Johannes</forename><surname>C. Ziegler</surname></persName><affiliation>School of Behavioural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</affiliation><affiliation>CREPCO-CNRS, Aix-en-Provence, France</affiliation><affiliation>Corresponding author. Tel.: +61 2 98506732; fax: +61 2 98508062; e-mail: jziegler@frogmouth.bhs.mq.edu.au</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Conrad</forename><surname>Perry</surname></persName><affiliation>School of Behavioural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">CD748A8C598A0CD78B8D9371176885D24F84E188</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00047-X</idno><idno type="PII">S0010-0277(98)00047-X</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Cognition</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">COGNIT</title><idno type="pISSN">0010-0277</idno><idno type="PII">S0010-0277(00)X0040-6</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1998"></date><biblScope unit="volume">68</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="B53">B53</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="B62">B62</biblScope></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1998</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>In the area of visual word recognition, there is considerable disagreement as to whether neighborhood effects for words in the lexical decision task are facilitatory or inhibitory: While they seem to be mostly facilitatory in English, they tend to be absent or inhibitory in French or Spanish. The present study investigated the possibility that the facilitatory neighborhood effect obtained in English is due to the fact that most neighbors in English are body neighbors (i.e. they share the same orthographic rime). Our results showed that when words were matched for orthographic neighborhood (N), the effects of body neighbors (BN) were facilitatory (i.e. shorter reaction times for words with many body neighbors than for words with few body neighbors). In contrast, when words are matched for BN, the effects of N are unreliable with a tendency towards inhibition. In conclusion, it appears that research conducted in English has always found neighborhood effects to be facilitatory because of the dominant role of body neighbors in English. In contrast, neighborhood effects in French and Spanish may have been more ambiguous because these languages either do not confound N and BN, or they do not require a greater sensitivity to the body/rime unit.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>Keywords</head><item><term>Neighborhood effects</term></item><item><term>Body effects</term></item><item><term>Visual word recognition</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1998">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/CD748A8C598A0CD78B8D9371176885D24F84E188/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Elsevier, elements deleted: ce:floats; body; tail"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//ES//DTD journal article DTD version 4.5.2//EN//XML" URI="art452.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><converted-article version="4.5.2" docsubtype="fla"><item-info><jid>COGNIT</jid><aid>885</aid><ce:pii>S0010-0277(98)00047-X</ce:pii><ce:doi>10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00047-X</ce:doi><ce:copyright year="1998" type="full-transfer">Elsevier Science B.V.</ce:copyright></item-info><head><ce:dochead><ce:textfn>Brief article</ce:textfn></ce:dochead><ce:title>No more problems in Coltheart's neighborhood: resolving neighborhood conflicts in the lexical decision task</ce:title><ce:author-group><ce:author><ce:given-name>Johannes</ce:given-name><ce:surname>C. Ziegler</ce:surname><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF1">a</ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF2">b</ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="CORR1">*</ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>Conrad</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Perry</ce:surname><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF1">a</ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:affiliation id="AFF1"><ce:label>a</ce:label><ce:textfn>School of Behavioural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation><ce:affiliation id="AFF2"><ce:label>b</ce:label><ce:textfn>CREPCO-CNRS, Aix-en-Provence, France</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation><ce:correspondence id="CORR1"><ce:label>*</ce:label><ce:text>Corresponding author. Tel.: +61 2 98506732; fax: +61 2 98508062; e-mail: jziegler@frogmouth.bhs.mq.edu.au</ce:text></ce:correspondence></ce:author-group><ce:date-received day="13" month="5" year="1998"></ce:date-received><ce:date-accepted day="30" month="6" year="1998"></ce:date-accepted><ce:abstract><ce:section-title>Abstract</ce:section-title><ce:abstract-sec><ce:simple-para>In the area of visual word recognition, there is considerable disagreement as to whether neighborhood effects for words in the lexical decision task are facilitatory or inhibitory: While they seem to be mostly facilitatory in English, they tend to be absent or inhibitory in French or Spanish. The present study investigated the possibility that the facilitatory neighborhood effect obtained in English is due to the fact that most neighbors in English are body neighbors (i.e. they share the same orthographic rime). Our results showed that when words were matched for orthographic neighborhood (N), the effects of body neighbors (BN) were facilitatory (i.e. shorter reaction times for words with many body neighbors than for words with few body neighbors). In contrast, when words are matched for BN, the effects of N are unreliable with a tendency towards inhibition. In conclusion, it appears that research conducted in English has always found neighborhood effects to be facilitatory because of the dominant role of body neighbors in English. In contrast, neighborhood effects in French and Spanish may have been more ambiguous because these languages either do not confound N and BN, or they do not require a greater sensitivity to the body/rime unit.</ce:simple-para></ce:abstract-sec></ce:abstract><ce:keywords class="keyword"><ce:section-title>Keywords</ce:section-title><ce:keyword><ce:text>Neighborhood effects</ce:text></ce:keyword><ce:keyword><ce:text>Body effects</ce:text></ce:keyword><ce:keyword><ce:text>Visual word recognition</ce:text></ce:keyword></ce:keywords></head></converted-article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo><title>No more problems in Coltheart's neighborhood: resolving neighborhood conflicts in the lexical decision task</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA"><title>No more problems in Coltheart's neighborhood: resolving neighborhood conflicts in the lexical decision task</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Johannes</namePart><namePart type="family">C. Ziegler</namePart><affiliation>School of Behavioural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</affiliation><affiliation>CREPCO-CNRS, Aix-en-Provence, France</affiliation><affiliation>Corresponding author. Tel.: +61 2 98506732; fax: +61 2 98508062; e-mail: jziegler@frogmouth.bhs.mq.edu.au</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Conrad</namePart><namePart type="family">Perry</namePart><affiliation>School of Behavioural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="Full-length article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1998</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1998</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><abstract lang="en">Abstract: In the area of visual word recognition, there is considerable disagreement as to whether neighborhood effects for words in the lexical decision task are facilitatory or inhibitory: While they seem to be mostly facilitatory in English, they tend to be absent or inhibitory in French or Spanish. The present study investigated the possibility that the facilitatory neighborhood effect obtained in English is due to the fact that most neighbors in English are body neighbors (i.e. they share the same orthographic rime). Our results showed that when words were matched for orthographic neighborhood (N), the effects of body neighbors (BN) were facilitatory (i.e. shorter reaction times for words with many body neighbors than for words with few body neighbors). In contrast, when words are matched for BN, the effects of N are unreliable with a tendency towards inhibition. In conclusion, it appears that research conducted in English has always found neighborhood effects to be facilitatory because of the dominant role of body neighbors in English. In contrast, neighborhood effects in French and Spanish may have been more ambiguous because these languages either do not confound N and BN, or they do not require a greater sensitivity to the body/rime unit.</abstract><note type="content">Section title: Brief article</note><note type="content">Table 1: Stimulus characteristics for words and nonwords with few versus many body neighbors (BN) and with few versus many letter neighbors (N)</note><note type="content">Table 2: Mean lexical decision latencies and error rates for words and nonwords with few versus many body neighbors (BN) and with few versus many letter neighbors (N)</note><subject><genre>Keywords</genre><topic>Neighborhood effects</topic><topic>Body effects</topic><topic>Visual word recognition</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Cognition</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>COGNIT</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">199808</dateIssued></originInfo><identifier type="ISSN">0010-0277</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0010-0277(00)X0040-6</identifier><part><date>199808</date><detail type="volume"><number>68</number><caption>vol.</caption></detail><detail type="issue"><number>2</number><caption>no.</caption></detail><extent unit="issue-pages"><start>B31</start><end>B70</end></extent><extent unit="issue-pages"><start>95</start><end>166</end></extent><extent unit="pages"><start>B53</start><end>B62</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">CD748A8C598A0CD78B8D9371176885D24F84E188</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/6H6-TRHZWG4W-X</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00047-X</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0010-0277(98)00047-X</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">©1998 Elsevier Science B.V.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-HKKZVM7B-M">elsevier</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Elsevier Science B.V., ©1998</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/CD748A8C598A0CD78B8D9371176885D24F84E188/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Asie/explor/AustralieFrV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002633 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002633 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Asie
|area= AustralieFrV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:CD748A8C598A0CD78B8D9371176885D24F84E188
|texte= No more problems in Coltheart's neighborhood: resolving neighborhood conflicts in the lexical decision task
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |