Variation of musculoskeletal stress markers in the medieval population from Cedynia (Poland)--proposal of standardized scoring method application.
Identifieur interne : 000277 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000276; suivant : 000278Variation of musculoskeletal stress markers in the medieval population from Cedynia (Poland)--proposal of standardized scoring method application.
Auteurs : Anna Myszka ; Janusz PiontekSource :
- Collegium antropologicum [ 0350-6134 ] ; 2012.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Anatomic Landmarks, Bone and Bones (pathology), Bone and Bones (physiology), Female, History, Medieval, Humans, Male, Musculoskeletal Diseases (history), Musculoskeletal Diseases (pathology), Musculoskeletal Diseases (physiopathology), Paleopathology (methods), Paleopathology (standards), Poland, Reference Standards, Sex Characteristics, Stress, Mechanical.
- MESH :
- geographic : Poland.
- history : Musculoskeletal Diseases.
- methods : Paleopathology.
- pathology : Bone and Bones, Musculoskeletal Diseases.
- physiology : Bone and Bones.
- physiopathology : Musculoskeletal Diseases.
- standards : Paleopathology.
- Anatomic Landmarks, Female, History, Medieval, Humans, Male, Reference Standards, Sex Characteristics, Stress, Mechanical.
Abstract
The objective of this paper is: (a) to present a rating scale for the evaluation of the musculoskeletal stress markers; (b) to analyze the medieval population from Cedynia in terms of the degree of expression and frequency of the musculoskeletal stress markers. The presented rating scale was developed based on the variability of the morphology of muscle attachment sites, observed in the skeletal material from Cedynia (102 males and 99 females). The scale encompasses 10 musculoskeletal stress markers located on the scapula, humerus, radius, femur and tibia. The system reflects three degrees (1, 2, 3) of complexity of the muscle attachment sites morphology. The analysis of asymmetry and sexual dimorphism of the musculoskeletal stress markers was made based on the chi2 (Pearson) statistics or chi2 statistics for 2 x 2 tables. Moderate degree (2) of muscle attachment site complexity is the most frequent degree of musculoskeletal stress markers development in the population from Cedynia. Low (1) and high (3) complexity of muscle attachment site are the most seldom observed categories. No statistically significant differences between the frequencies of the musculoskeletal stress markers on the bones of the right and left side of the skeleton were noted in females. Also in males the differences found were not statistically significant. Only in the case of deltoid tuberosity (H2) p = 0.052 oscillating around the threshold value may suggest existence of a statistically significant difference in the degree of expression of this stress marker on the bone of the right and left side of the skeleton. On the bones of the right side of the skeleton dimorphic differences were observed in the glenoid tuberosity (S2), bicipital groove (H1), pronator teres origin (R2), tibial tuberosity (T1), soleal crest (T2) and linea aspera (F2). On the bones of the left side of the skeleton dimorphic differences were noted for the bicipital groove (H1), pronator teres origin (R2) and glenoid tuberosity (S2).
PubMed: 23213964
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:23213964Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Variation of musculoskeletal stress markers in the medieval population from Cedynia (Poland)--proposal of standardized scoring method application.</title><author><name sortKey="Myszka, Anna" sort="Myszka, Anna" uniqKey="Myszka A" first="Anna" last="Myszka">Anna Myszka</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Adam Mickiewicz University, Institute of Anthropology, Department of Human Evolutionary Anthropology, Poznan, Poland. myszanka@amu.edu.pl</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Piontek, Janusz" sort="Piontek, Janusz" uniqKey="Piontek J" first="Janusz" last="Piontek">Janusz Piontek</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2012">2012</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:23213964</idno><idno type="pmid">23213964</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000277</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000277</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Variation of musculoskeletal stress markers in the medieval population from Cedynia (Poland)--proposal of standardized scoring method application.</title><author><name sortKey="Myszka, Anna" sort="Myszka, Anna" uniqKey="Myszka A" first="Anna" last="Myszka">Anna Myszka</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Adam Mickiewicz University, Institute of Anthropology, Department of Human Evolutionary Anthropology, Poznan, Poland. myszanka@amu.edu.pl</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Piontek, Janusz" sort="Piontek, Janusz" uniqKey="Piontek J" first="Janusz" last="Piontek">Janusz Piontek</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Collegium antropologicum</title><idno type="ISSN">0350-6134</idno><imprint><date when="2012" type="published">2012</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Anatomic Landmarks</term><term>Bone and Bones (pathology)</term><term>Bone and Bones (physiology)</term><term>Female</term><term>History, Medieval</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Musculoskeletal Diseases (history)</term><term>Musculoskeletal Diseases (pathology)</term><term>Musculoskeletal Diseases (physiopathology)</term><term>Paleopathology (methods)</term><term>Paleopathology (standards)</term><term>Poland</term><term>Reference Standards</term><term>Sex Characteristics</term><term>Stress, Mechanical</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" xml:lang="en"><term>Poland</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="history" xml:lang="en"><term>Musculoskeletal Diseases</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Paleopathology</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="pathology" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone and Bones</term><term>Musculoskeletal Diseases</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone and Bones</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiopathology" xml:lang="en"><term>Musculoskeletal Diseases</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="standards" xml:lang="en"><term>Paleopathology</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Anatomic Landmarks</term><term>Female</term><term>History, Medieval</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Reference Standards</term><term>Sex Characteristics</term><term>Stress, Mechanical</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The objective of this paper is: (a) to present a rating scale for the evaluation of the musculoskeletal stress markers; (b) to analyze the medieval population from Cedynia in terms of the degree of expression and frequency of the musculoskeletal stress markers. The presented rating scale was developed based on the variability of the morphology of muscle attachment sites, observed in the skeletal material from Cedynia (102 males and 99 females). The scale encompasses 10 musculoskeletal stress markers located on the scapula, humerus, radius, femur and tibia. The system reflects three degrees (1, 2, 3) of complexity of the muscle attachment sites morphology. The analysis of asymmetry and sexual dimorphism of the musculoskeletal stress markers was made based on the chi2 (Pearson) statistics or chi2 statistics for 2 x 2 tables. Moderate degree (2) of muscle attachment site complexity is the most frequent degree of musculoskeletal stress markers development in the population from Cedynia. Low (1) and high (3) complexity of muscle attachment site are the most seldom observed categories. No statistically significant differences between the frequencies of the musculoskeletal stress markers on the bones of the right and left side of the skeleton were noted in females. Also in males the differences found were not statistically significant. Only in the case of deltoid tuberosity (H2) p = 0.052 oscillating around the threshold value may suggest existence of a statistically significant difference in the degree of expression of this stress marker on the bone of the right and left side of the skeleton. On the bones of the right side of the skeleton dimorphic differences were observed in the glenoid tuberosity (S2), bicipital groove (H1), pronator teres origin (R2), tibial tuberosity (T1), soleal crest (T2) and linea aspera (F2). On the bones of the left side of the skeleton dimorphic differences were noted for the bicipital groove (H1), pronator teres origin (R2) and glenoid tuberosity (S2).</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">23213964</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2012</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>07</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2013</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>08</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2012</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>07</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0350-6134</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>36</Volume><Issue>3</Issue><PubDate><Year>2012</Year><Month>Sep</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Collegium antropologicum</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Coll Antropol</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Variation of musculoskeletal stress markers in the medieval population from Cedynia (Poland)--proposal of standardized scoring method application.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>1009-17</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>The objective of this paper is: (a) to present a rating scale for the evaluation of the musculoskeletal stress markers; (b) to analyze the medieval population from Cedynia in terms of the degree of expression and frequency of the musculoskeletal stress markers. The presented rating scale was developed based on the variability of the morphology of muscle attachment sites, observed in the skeletal material from Cedynia (102 males and 99 females). The scale encompasses 10 musculoskeletal stress markers located on the scapula, humerus, radius, femur and tibia. The system reflects three degrees (1, 2, 3) of complexity of the muscle attachment sites morphology. The analysis of asymmetry and sexual dimorphism of the musculoskeletal stress markers was made based on the chi2 (Pearson) statistics or chi2 statistics for 2 x 2 tables. Moderate degree (2) of muscle attachment site complexity is the most frequent degree of musculoskeletal stress markers development in the population from Cedynia. Low (1) and high (3) complexity of muscle attachment site are the most seldom observed categories. No statistically significant differences between the frequencies of the musculoskeletal stress markers on the bones of the right and left side of the skeleton were noted in females. Also in males the differences found were not statistically significant. Only in the case of deltoid tuberosity (H2) p = 0.052 oscillating around the threshold value may suggest existence of a statistically significant difference in the degree of expression of this stress marker on the bone of the right and left side of the skeleton. On the bones of the right side of the skeleton dimorphic differences were observed in the glenoid tuberosity (S2), bicipital groove (H1), pronator teres origin (R2), tibial tuberosity (T1), soleal crest (T2) and linea aspera (F2). On the bones of the left side of the skeleton dimorphic differences were noted for the bicipital groove (H1), pronator teres origin (R2) and glenoid tuberosity (S2).</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Myszka</LastName><ForeName>Anna</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Adam Mickiewicz University, Institute of Anthropology, Department of Human Evolutionary Anthropology, Poznan, Poland. myszanka@amu.edu.pl</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Piontek</LastName><ForeName>Janusz</ForeName><Initials>J</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016456">Historical Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D023361">Validation Studies</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Croatia</Country><MedlineTA>Coll Antropol</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>8003354</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0350-6134</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D059925" MajorTopicYN="N">Anatomic Landmarks</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001842" MajorTopicYN="N">Bone and Bones</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000473" MajorTopicYN="Y">pathology</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D049691" MajorTopicYN="N">History, Medieval</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009140" MajorTopicYN="N">Musculoskeletal Diseases</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000266" MajorTopicYN="Y">history</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000473" MajorTopicYN="Y">pathology</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000503" MajorTopicYN="N">physiopathology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010164" MajorTopicYN="N">Paleopathology</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000592" MajorTopicYN="Y">standards</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011044" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">Poland</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012015" MajorTopicYN="N">Reference Standards</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012727" MajorTopicYN="N">Sex Characteristics</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013314" MajorTopicYN="N">Stress, Mechanical</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2012</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>11</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2012</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>12</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2013</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>9</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23213964</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Archeologie/explor/PaleopathV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000277 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000277 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Archeologie
|area= PaleopathV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:23213964
|texte= Variation of musculoskeletal stress markers in the medieval population from Cedynia (Poland)--proposal of standardized scoring method application.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:23213964" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a PaleopathV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.27. |  |