Evaluation of codon biology in citrus and Poncirus trifoliata based on genomic features and frame corrected expressed sequence tags.
Identifieur interne : 000477 ( PubMed/Curation ); précédent : 000476; suivant : 000478Evaluation of codon biology in citrus and Poncirus trifoliata based on genomic features and frame corrected expressed sequence tags.
Auteurs : Touqeer Ahmad [République populaire de Chine] ; Gaurav Sablok ; Tatiana V. Tatarinova ; Qiang Xu ; Xiu-Xin Deng ; Wen-Wu GuoSource :
- DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes [ 1756-1663 ] ; 2013.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- chemical , genetics : Codon.
- genetics : Citrus, Poncirus.
- Conserved Sequence, Expressed Sequence Tags, Gene Expression Regulation, Plant, Genetic Variation, Genome, Plant, Genomics.
Abstract
Citrus, as one of the globally important fruit trees, has been an object of interest for understanding genetics and evolutionary process in fruit crops. Meta-analyses of 19 Citrus species, including 4 globally and economically important Citrus sinensis, Citrus clementina, Citrus reticulata, and 1 Citrus relative Poncirus trifoliata, were performed. We observed that codons ending with A- or T- at the wobble position were preferred in contrast to C- or G- ending codons, indicating a close association with AT richness of Citrus species and P. trifoliata. The present study postulates a large repertoire of a set of optimal codons for the Citrus genus and P. trifoliata and demonstrates that GCT and GGT are evolutionary conserved optimal codons. Our observation suggested that mutational bias is the dominating force in shaping the codon usage bias (CUB) in Citrus and P. trifoliata. Correspondence analysis (COA) revealed that the principal axis [axis 1; COA/relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU)] contributes only a minor portion (∼10.96%) of the recorded variance. In all analysed species, except P. trifoliata, Gravy and aromaticity played minor roles in resolving CUB. Compositional constraints were found to be strongly associated with the amino acid signatures in Citrus species and P. trifoliata. Our present analysis postulates compositional constraints in Citrus species and P. trifoliata and plausible role of the stress with GC3 and coevolution pattern of amino acid.
DOI: 10.1093/dnares/dss039
PubMed: 23315666
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000477
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:23315666Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Evaluation of codon biology in citrus and Poncirus trifoliata based on genomic features and frame corrected expressed sequence tags.</title><author><name sortKey="Ahmad, Touqeer" sort="Ahmad, Touqeer" uniqKey="Ahmad T" first="Touqeer" last="Ahmad">Touqeer Ahmad</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Key Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology MOE, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">République populaire de Chine</country><wicri:regionArea>Key Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology MOE, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sablok, Gaurav" sort="Sablok, Gaurav" uniqKey="Sablok G" first="Gaurav" last="Sablok">Gaurav Sablok</name></author><author><name sortKey="Tatarinova, Tatiana V" sort="Tatarinova, Tatiana V" uniqKey="Tatarinova T" first="Tatiana V" last="Tatarinova">Tatiana V. Tatarinova</name></author><author><name sortKey="Xu, Qiang" sort="Xu, Qiang" uniqKey="Xu Q" first="Qiang" last="Xu">Qiang Xu</name></author><author><name sortKey="Deng, Xiu Xin" sort="Deng, Xiu Xin" uniqKey="Deng X" first="Xiu-Xin" last="Deng">Xiu-Xin Deng</name></author><author><name sortKey="Guo, Wen Wu" sort="Guo, Wen Wu" uniqKey="Guo W" first="Wen-Wu" last="Guo">Wen-Wu Guo</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2013">2013</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:23315666</idno><idno type="pmid">23315666</idno><idno type="doi">10.1093/dnares/dss039</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000477</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000477</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Evaluation of codon biology in citrus and Poncirus trifoliata based on genomic features and frame corrected expressed sequence tags.</title><author><name sortKey="Ahmad, Touqeer" sort="Ahmad, Touqeer" uniqKey="Ahmad T" first="Touqeer" last="Ahmad">Touqeer Ahmad</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Key Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology MOE, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">République populaire de Chine</country><wicri:regionArea>Key Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology MOE, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sablok, Gaurav" sort="Sablok, Gaurav" uniqKey="Sablok G" first="Gaurav" last="Sablok">Gaurav Sablok</name></author><author><name sortKey="Tatarinova, Tatiana V" sort="Tatarinova, Tatiana V" uniqKey="Tatarinova T" first="Tatiana V" last="Tatarinova">Tatiana V. Tatarinova</name></author><author><name sortKey="Xu, Qiang" sort="Xu, Qiang" uniqKey="Xu Q" first="Qiang" last="Xu">Qiang Xu</name></author><author><name sortKey="Deng, Xiu Xin" sort="Deng, Xiu Xin" uniqKey="Deng X" first="Xiu-Xin" last="Deng">Xiu-Xin Deng</name></author><author><name sortKey="Guo, Wen Wu" sort="Guo, Wen Wu" uniqKey="Guo W" first="Wen-Wu" last="Guo">Wen-Wu Guo</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes</title><idno type="eISSN">1756-1663</idno><imprint><date when="2013" type="published">2013</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Citrus (genetics)</term><term>Codon (genetics)</term><term>Conserved Sequence</term><term>Expressed Sequence Tags</term><term>Gene Expression Regulation, Plant</term><term>Genetic Variation</term><term>Genome, Plant</term><term>Genomics</term><term>Poncirus (genetics)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="genetics" xml:lang="en"><term>Codon</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="genetics" xml:lang="en"><term>Citrus</term><term>Poncirus</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Conserved Sequence</term><term>Expressed Sequence Tags</term><term>Gene Expression Regulation, Plant</term><term>Genetic Variation</term><term>Genome, Plant</term><term>Genomics</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Citrus, as one of the globally important fruit trees, has been an object of interest for understanding genetics and evolutionary process in fruit crops. Meta-analyses of 19 Citrus species, including 4 globally and economically important Citrus sinensis, Citrus clementina, Citrus reticulata, and 1 Citrus relative Poncirus trifoliata, were performed. We observed that codons ending with A- or T- at the wobble position were preferred in contrast to C- or G- ending codons, indicating a close association with AT richness of Citrus species and P. trifoliata. The present study postulates a large repertoire of a set of optimal codons for the Citrus genus and P. trifoliata and demonstrates that GCT and GGT are evolutionary conserved optimal codons. Our observation suggested that mutational bias is the dominating force in shaping the codon usage bias (CUB) in Citrus and P. trifoliata. Correspondence analysis (COA) revealed that the principal axis [axis 1; COA/relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU)] contributes only a minor portion (∼10.96%) of the recorded variance. In all analysed species, except P. trifoliata, Gravy and aromaticity played minor roles in resolving CUB. Compositional constraints were found to be strongly associated with the amino acid signatures in Citrus species and P. trifoliata. Our present analysis postulates compositional constraints in Citrus species and P. trifoliata and plausible role of the stress with GC3 and coevolution pattern of amino acid.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">23315666</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2013</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>18</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2013</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>06</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2015</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>19</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1756-1663</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>20</Volume><Issue>2</Issue><PubDate><Year>2013</Year><Month>Apr</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes</Title><ISOAbbreviation>DNA Res.</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Evaluation of codon biology in citrus and Poncirus trifoliata based on genomic features and frame corrected expressed sequence tags.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>135-50</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1093/dnares/dss039</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Citrus, as one of the globally important fruit trees, has been an object of interest for understanding genetics and evolutionary process in fruit crops. Meta-analyses of 19 Citrus species, including 4 globally and economically important Citrus sinensis, Citrus clementina, Citrus reticulata, and 1 Citrus relative Poncirus trifoliata, were performed. We observed that codons ending with A- or T- at the wobble position were preferred in contrast to C- or G- ending codons, indicating a close association with AT richness of Citrus species and P. trifoliata. The present study postulates a large repertoire of a set of optimal codons for the Citrus genus and P. trifoliata and demonstrates that GCT and GGT are evolutionary conserved optimal codons. Our observation suggested that mutational bias is the dominating force in shaping the codon usage bias (CUB) in Citrus and P. trifoliata. Correspondence analysis (COA) revealed that the principal axis [axis 1; COA/relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU)] contributes only a minor portion (∼10.96%) of the recorded variance. In all analysed species, except P. trifoliata, Gravy and aromaticity played minor roles in resolving CUB. Compositional constraints were found to be strongly associated with the amino acid signatures in Citrus species and P. trifoliata. Our present analysis postulates compositional constraints in Citrus species and P. trifoliata and plausible role of the stress with GC3 and coevolution pattern of amino acid.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ahmad</LastName><ForeName>Touqeer</ForeName><Initials>T</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Key Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology MOE, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Sablok</LastName><ForeName>Gaurav</ForeName><Initials>G</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Tatarinova</LastName><ForeName>Tatiana V</ForeName><Initials>TV</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Xu</LastName><ForeName>Qiang</ForeName><Initials>Q</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Deng</LastName><ForeName>Xiu-Xin</ForeName><Initials>XX</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Guo</LastName><ForeName>Wen-Wu</ForeName><Initials>WW</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>ENG</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D023362">Evaluation Studies</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2013</Year><Month>Jan</Month><Day>11</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>DNA Res</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9423827</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1340-2838</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D003062">Codon</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Mol Biol. 1991 Dec 20;222(4):851-6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">1762151</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Gene. 1992 Apr 1;113(1):55-65</RefSource><PMID Version="1">1563633</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1994 Dec;4(6):851-60</RefSource><PMID Version="1">7888755</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Mol Evol. 1997 Mar;44(3):282-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9060394</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Sep 1;25(17):3389-402</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9254694</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Genome Res. 1997 Oct;7(10):986-95</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9331369</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Sep 1;95(18):10698-703</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9724767</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1998 Dec;8(6):688-93</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9914211</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Genome Res. 1999 Sep;9(9):868-77</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10508846</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Genetics. 2004 Dec;168(4):2245-60</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15611189</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Proteins. 2005 Jul 1;60(1):27-35</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15849754</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Gene. 2006 Mar 1;368:117-25</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16380221</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Sep 26;103(39):14412-6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16971485</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Feb;24(2):374-81</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17101719</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>BMC Evol Biol. 2007;7 Suppl 1:S6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17288579</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Genetics. 2008 Apr;178(4):2093-104</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18430935</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Annu Rev Genet. 2008;42:287-99</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18983258</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>BMC Evol Biol. 2008;8:307</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18983655</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Bioinformatics. 2009 Mar 1;25(5):670-1</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19153134</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Science. 2009 Apr 10;324(5924):255-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19359587</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2009 May;16(5):564-71</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19377480</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>PLoS Genet. 2009 Jul;5(7):e1000556</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19593368</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>BMC Plant Biol. 2009;9:134</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19930558</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>PLoS Pathog. 2010 Mar;6(3):e1000797</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20221432</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Apr 27;365(1544):1203-12</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20308095</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>PLoS Comput Biol. 2010 May;6(5):e1000767</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20463869</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>BMC Genomics. 2010;11:308</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20470436</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Gene. 2001 Jul 25;273(1):63-70</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11483361</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2001 Dec;11(6):660-6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11682310</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Mol Biol Evol. 2011 Jan;28(1):117-29</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20656793</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Plant Cell Rep. 2011 Jan;30(1):113-24</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21076835</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jan 25;108(4):1537-42</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21220310</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Genome Biol Evol. 2011;3:332-43</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21402862</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:124</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21526987</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Mol Biotechnol. 2011 Oct;49(2):116-28</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21308422</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>PLoS Genet. 2012;8(3):e1002603</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22479199</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Plant Cell. 2012 Apr;24(4):1379-97</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22492812</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nat Genet. 2013 Jan;45(1):59-66</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23179022</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>PLoS One. 2010;5(10):e13431</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21048949</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Mol Biol Evol. 2000 Nov;17(11):1581-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11070046</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Gene. 2000 Dec 30;261(1):53-62</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11164037</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Genome Biol. 2001;2(4):RESEARCH0010</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11305938</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2002 Dec;12(6):640-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12433576</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Jul 1;31(13):3738-41</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12824407</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2004 Feb;21(4):527-36</RefSource><PMID Version="1">14692797</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Mar 9;101(10):3480-5</RefSource><PMID Version="1">14990797</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>BMC Genomics. 2004 May 10;5(1):30</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15134588</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>BMC Evol Biol. 2004 Jun 28;4:19</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15222899</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Genet Res. 1966 Dec;8(3):269-94</RefSource><PMID Version="1">5980116</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nucleic Acids Res. 1981 Jan 10;9(1):r43-74</RefSource><PMID Version="1">7208352</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Mol Biol. 1982 May 5;157(1):105-32</RefSource><PMID Version="1">7108955</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Mol Evol. 1986;24(1-2):28-38</RefSource><PMID Version="1">3104616</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Apr;85(8):2653-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">3357886</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Mol Biol Evol. 1985 Jan;2(1):13-34</RefSource><PMID Version="1">3916708</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Sep 12;16(17):8207-11</RefSource><PMID Version="1">3138659</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Gene. 1990 Mar 1;87(1):23-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">2110097</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Microbiol Rev. 1990 Jun;54(2):198-210</RefSource><PMID Version="1">2194095</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Mol Biol. 1991 Nov 20;222(2):265-80</RefSource><PMID Version="1">1960727</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Genetics. 1991 Nov;129(3):897-907</RefSource><PMID Version="1">1752426</PMID></CommentsCorrections></CommentsCorrectionsList><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D002957" MajorTopicYN="N">Citrus</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="N">genetics</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003062" MajorTopicYN="N">Codon</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="Y">genetics</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017124" MajorTopicYN="N">Conserved Sequence</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D020224" MajorTopicYN="Y">Expressed Sequence Tags</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018506" MajorTopicYN="N">Gene Expression Regulation, Plant</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014644" MajorTopicYN="N">Genetic Variation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018745" MajorTopicYN="N">Genome, Plant</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D023281" MajorTopicYN="N">Genomics</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D032104" MajorTopicYN="N">Poncirus</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="Y">genetics</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><OtherID Source="NLM">PMC3628444</OtherID></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2013</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>15</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2013</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>15</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2013</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>7</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23315666</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">dss039</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1093/dnares/dss039</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC3628444</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Bois/explor/OrangerV1/Data/PubMed/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000477 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000477 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Bois
|area= OrangerV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:23315666
|texte= Evaluation of codon biology in citrus and Poncirus trifoliata based on genomic features and frame corrected expressed sequence tags.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:23315666" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a OrangerV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.25. |  |