Spray Volume, Distribution, and Efficacy of 5-Chloro-3-methyl-4-nitro-1H-pyrazole for Loosening Sweet Orange
Identifieur interne : 000725 ( PascalFrancis/Curation ); précédent : 000724; suivant : 000726Spray Volume, Distribution, and Efficacy of 5-Chloro-3-methyl-4-nitro-1H-pyrazole for Loosening Sweet Orange
Auteurs : Robert C. Ebel [États-Unis] ; Jacqueline K. Burns [États-Unis] ; Kelly T. Morgan [États-Unis]Source :
- HortScience [ 0018-5345 ] ; 2009.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
- Wicri :
- topic : Horticulture, Eau.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
The abscission compound CMNP (5-chloro-3-methyl-4-nitro-1H-pyrazole) was applied to fully mature sweet orange trees at different spray volumes using a vertical, multiple-fan air-blast sprayer to determine distribution of fruit loosening throughout the canopy and subsequent effects on mechanical harvester efficiency. CMNP was applied at 0, 935,1871, and 2806 L.ha-1in three 'Valencia' and one 'Hamlin' grove. Spray coverage was measured using water-sensitive paper and fruit loosening was measured by fruit detachment force (FDF). Spray coverage and FDF were measured at 1-, 2-, and 4-m height within the canopy and inside the canopy near the trunk and on the periphery of the canopy. Spray coverage increased with volume of CMNP applied. Spray coverage was higher at 4 m than 1 and 2 m, which were similar. Spray coverage within the canopy was decreased almost half compared with that of the periphery. FDF was unaffected by spray volume at the different heights except in one trial where fruit had higher FDF at 4 m. Fruit inside the canopy did not loosen as much as fruit outside the canopy in three of the four trials. FDF inside the canopy averaged 52 to 84 N, whereas fruit on the periphery of the canopy averaged 50 to 74 N. CMNP promoted fruit drop, but only in two trials was the amount over 5% of the total yield for the 2806-L.ha-1 treatment. The fruit were harvested by canopy shakers that captured fruit on catch frames, except one of the 'Valencia' trials in which the canopy shaker did not have a catch frame. The percent of the total crop removed by the harvesters increased when CMNP was applied at higher spray volumes except in the 'Hamlin' trial in which there was no difference among volume treatments. The percent of the total crop removed by the harvester but not captured by the catch frame increased at higher volumes of CMNP applied for two of the three trials in which catch frames were used. Fruit loss with greater volume of CMNP applied was promoted by peripheral canopy contact with the front shield of the harvester that knocked fruit down before the catch frame moved under that portion of the canopy. Recovery percentage, or the percentage of total yield that was caught and conveyed to bulk collection by the harvester catch frame, averaged 78.1% to 87.8% of total yield. Higher CMNP volume with increased removal rate compensated for higher catch frame loss, providing overall higher recovery percentage. Based on the goals of minimizing fruit drop and maximizing fruit recovery, the range of FDF that should be reached by harvest is 40 N to 65 N for canopy shakers equipped with catch frames. These trials underscore the importance of adequate CMNP coverage for reducing in-canopy variation of fruit loosening and maximizing fruit removal.
pA |
|
---|
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PascalFrancis, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000275
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:10-0047581Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Spray Volume, Distribution, and Efficacy of 5-Chloro-3-methyl-4-nitro-1H-pyrazole for Loosening Sweet Orange</title>
<author><name sortKey="Ebel, Robert C" sort="Ebel, Robert C" uniqKey="Ebel R" first="Robert C." last="Ebel">Robert C. Ebel</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Florida, IFAS, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2686 Highway 29 N.</s1>
<s2>Imokalee, FL 34142</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Burns, Jacqueline K" sort="Burns, Jacqueline K" uniqKey="Burns J" first="Jacqueline K." last="Burns">Jacqueline K. Burns</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Citrus Research and Education Center, 700 Experiment Station Road</s1>
<s2>Lake Alfred, FL 33850</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Morgan, Kelly T" sort="Morgan, Kelly T" uniqKey="Morgan K" first="Kelly T." last="Morgan">Kelly T. Morgan</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Florida, IFAS, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2686 Highway 29 N.</s1>
<s2>Imokalee, FL 34142</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">10-0047581</idno>
<date when="2009">2009</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 10-0047581 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:10-0047581</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000275</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Curation">000725</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Spray Volume, Distribution, and Efficacy of 5-Chloro-3-methyl-4-nitro-1H-pyrazole for Loosening Sweet Orange</title>
<author><name sortKey="Ebel, Robert C" sort="Ebel, Robert C" uniqKey="Ebel R" first="Robert C." last="Ebel">Robert C. Ebel</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Florida, IFAS, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2686 Highway 29 N.</s1>
<s2>Imokalee, FL 34142</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Burns, Jacqueline K" sort="Burns, Jacqueline K" uniqKey="Burns J" first="Jacqueline K." last="Burns">Jacqueline K. Burns</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Citrus Research and Education Center, 700 Experiment Station Road</s1>
<s2>Lake Alfred, FL 33850</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Morgan, Kelly T" sort="Morgan, Kelly T" uniqKey="Morgan K" first="Kelly T." last="Morgan">Kelly T. Morgan</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Florida, IFAS, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2686 Highway 29 N.</s1>
<s2>Imokalee, FL 34142</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">HortScience</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">HortScience</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0018-5345</idno>
<imprint><date when="2009">2009</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">HortScience</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">HortScience</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0018-5345</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Air</term>
<term>Citrus sinensis</term>
<term>Distribution</term>
<term>Fan</term>
<term>Horticulture</term>
<term>Mechanical harvesting</term>
<term>Sprayer</term>
<term>Spraying</term>
<term>Vertical</term>
<term>Volume</term>
<term>Water</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Volume</term>
<term>Pulvérisation</term>
<term>Distribution</term>
<term>Récolte mécanique</term>
<term>Vertical</term>
<term>Ventilateur</term>
<term>Air</term>
<term>Pulvérisateur</term>
<term>Horticulture</term>
<term>Citrus sinensis</term>
<term>Eau</term>
<term>Pyrazole(3-chloro-5-méthyle-4-nitro)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Horticulture</term>
<term>Eau</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The abscission compound CMNP (5-chloro-3-methyl-4-nitro-1H-pyrazole) was applied to fully mature sweet orange trees at different spray volumes using a vertical, multiple-fan air-blast sprayer to determine distribution of fruit loosening throughout the canopy and subsequent effects on mechanical harvester efficiency. CMNP was applied at 0, 935,1871, and 2806 L.ha<sup>-1</sup>
in three 'Valencia' and one 'Hamlin' grove. Spray coverage was measured using water-sensitive paper and fruit loosening was measured by fruit detachment force (FDF). Spray coverage and FDF were measured at 1-, 2-, and 4-m height within the canopy and inside the canopy near the trunk and on the periphery of the canopy. Spray coverage increased with volume of CMNP applied. Spray coverage was higher at 4 m than 1 and 2 m, which were similar. Spray coverage within the canopy was decreased almost half compared with that of the periphery. FDF was unaffected by spray volume at the different heights except in one trial where fruit had higher FDF at 4 m. Fruit inside the canopy did not loosen as much as fruit outside the canopy in three of the four trials. FDF inside the canopy averaged 52 to 84 N, whereas fruit on the periphery of the canopy averaged 50 to 74 N. CMNP promoted fruit drop, but only in two trials was the amount over 5% of the total yield for the 2806-L.ha<sup>-1</sup>
treatment. The fruit were harvested by canopy shakers that captured fruit on catch frames, except one of the 'Valencia' trials in which the canopy shaker did not have a catch frame. The percent of the total crop removed by the harvesters increased when CMNP was applied at higher spray volumes except in the 'Hamlin' trial in which there was no difference among volume treatments. The percent of the total crop removed by the harvester but not captured by the catch frame increased at higher volumes of CMNP applied for two of the three trials in which catch frames were used. Fruit loss with greater volume of CMNP applied was promoted by peripheral canopy contact with the front shield of the harvester that knocked fruit down before the catch frame moved under that portion of the canopy. Recovery percentage, or the percentage of total yield that was caught and conveyed to bulk collection by the harvester catch frame, averaged 78.1% to 87.8% of total yield. Higher CMNP volume with increased removal rate compensated for higher catch frame loss, providing overall higher recovery percentage. Based on the goals of minimizing fruit drop and maximizing fruit recovery, the range of FDF that should be reached by harvest is 40 N to 65 N for canopy shakers equipped with catch frames. These trials underscore the importance of adequate CMNP coverage for reducing in-canopy variation of fruit loosening and maximizing fruit removal.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0018-5345</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>HJHSAR</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>HortScience</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>44</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>7</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Spray Volume, Distribution, and Efficacy of 5-Chloro-3-methyl-4-nitro-1H-pyrazole for Loosening Sweet Orange</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>EBEL (Robert C.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>BURNS (Jacqueline K.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>MORGAN (Kelly T.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Florida, IFAS, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2686 Highway 29 N.</s1>
<s2>Imokalee, FL 34142</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>Citrus Research and Education Center, 700 Experiment Station Road</s1>
<s2>Lake Alfred, FL 33850</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>1895-1899</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2009</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>13300</s2>
<s5>354000171567050160</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2010 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>1/4 p.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>10-0047581</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>HortScience</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>The abscission compound CMNP (5-chloro-3-methyl-4-nitro-1H-pyrazole) was applied to fully mature sweet orange trees at different spray volumes using a vertical, multiple-fan air-blast sprayer to determine distribution of fruit loosening throughout the canopy and subsequent effects on mechanical harvester efficiency. CMNP was applied at 0, 935,1871, and 2806 L.ha<sup>-1</sup>
in three 'Valencia' and one 'Hamlin' grove. Spray coverage was measured using water-sensitive paper and fruit loosening was measured by fruit detachment force (FDF). Spray coverage and FDF were measured at 1-, 2-, and 4-m height within the canopy and inside the canopy near the trunk and on the periphery of the canopy. Spray coverage increased with volume of CMNP applied. Spray coverage was higher at 4 m than 1 and 2 m, which were similar. Spray coverage within the canopy was decreased almost half compared with that of the periphery. FDF was unaffected by spray volume at the different heights except in one trial where fruit had higher FDF at 4 m. Fruit inside the canopy did not loosen as much as fruit outside the canopy in three of the four trials. FDF inside the canopy averaged 52 to 84 N, whereas fruit on the periphery of the canopy averaged 50 to 74 N. CMNP promoted fruit drop, but only in two trials was the amount over 5% of the total yield for the 2806-L.ha<sup>-1</sup>
treatment. The fruit were harvested by canopy shakers that captured fruit on catch frames, except one of the 'Valencia' trials in which the canopy shaker did not have a catch frame. The percent of the total crop removed by the harvesters increased when CMNP was applied at higher spray volumes except in the 'Hamlin' trial in which there was no difference among volume treatments. The percent of the total crop removed by the harvester but not captured by the catch frame increased at higher volumes of CMNP applied for two of the three trials in which catch frames were used. Fruit loss with greater volume of CMNP applied was promoted by peripheral canopy contact with the front shield of the harvester that knocked fruit down before the catch frame moved under that portion of the canopy. Recovery percentage, or the percentage of total yield that was caught and conveyed to bulk collection by the harvester catch frame, averaged 78.1% to 87.8% of total yield. Higher CMNP volume with increased removal rate compensated for higher catch frame loss, providing overall higher recovery percentage. Based on the goals of minimizing fruit drop and maximizing fruit recovery, the range of FDF that should be reached by harvest is 40 N to 65 N for canopy shakers equipped with catch frames. These trials underscore the importance of adequate CMNP coverage for reducing in-canopy variation of fruit loosening and maximizing fruit removal.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002A32</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Volume</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Volume</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Volumen</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Pulvérisation</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Spraying</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Pulverización</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Distribution</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Distribution</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Distribución</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Récolte mécanique</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Mechanical harvesting</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cosecha mecánica</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Vertical</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Vertical</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Vertical</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Ventilateur</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Fan</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Ventilador</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Air</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Air</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Aire</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Pulvérisateur</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Sprayer</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Pulverizador</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Horticulture</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Horticulture</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Horticultura</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Citrus sinensis</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Citrus sinensis</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Citrus sinensis</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Eau</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Water</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Agua</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Pyrazole(3-chloro-5-méthyle-4-nitro)</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>78</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Rutaceae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Rutaceae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Rutaceae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Dicotyledones</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Dicotyledones</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Dicotyledones</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Angiospermae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Angiospermae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Angiospermae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Spermatophyta</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Spermatophyta</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Spermatophyta</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Arbre fruitier</s0>
<s5>31</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Fruit tree</s0>
<s5>31</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Arbol frutal</s0>
<s5>31</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Agrume</s0>
<s5>32</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Citrus fruit</s0>
<s5>32</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Agrios</s0>
<s5>32</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Composé organique</s0>
<s2>NA</s2>
<s5>33</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Organic compounds</s0>
<s2>NA</s2>
<s5>33</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Compuesto orgánico</s0>
<s2>NA</s2>
<s5>33</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Plante fruitière</s0>
<s5>39</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Fruit crop</s0>
<s5>39</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Planta frutal</s0>
<s5>39</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Substance croissance végétal</s0>
<s5>50</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Plant growth substance</s0>
<s5>50</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Substancia crecimiento vegetal</s0>
<s5>50</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Dérivé du pyrazole</s0>
<s5>51</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Pyrazole derivatives</s0>
<s5>51</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Pirazol derivado</s0>
<s5>51</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Hétérocycle azote</s0>
<s5>52</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Nitrogen heterocycle</s0>
<s5>52</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Heterociclo nitrógeno</s0>
<s5>52</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="12" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Composé organique de l'azote</s0>
<s2>NK</s2>
<s5>53</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="12" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Organic nitrogen compounds</s0>
<s2>NK</s2>
<s5>53</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="12" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Compuesto orgánico nitrogenado</s0>
<s2>NK</s2>
<s5>53</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>032</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
</inist>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Bois/explor/OrangerV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000725 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000725 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Bois |area= OrangerV1 |flux= PascalFrancis |étape= Curation |type= RBID |clé= Pascal:10-0047581 |texte= Spray Volume, Distribution, and Efficacy of 5-Chloro-3-methyl-4-nitro-1H-pyrazole for Loosening Sweet Orange }}
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.25. | ![]() |