Serveur d'exploration sur la TEI

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

On the subject of subjects

Identifieur interne : 000196 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000195; suivant : 000197

On the subject of subjects

Auteurs : Arlene G. Taylor

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:BC573DFE30DA86321AF40EC531407C35969695AE

Abstract

This was a period of much argument over the relative virtues of classified and dictionary catalogs not only among librarians but among readers and scholars in general and even in reports to the House of Commons. Feelings ran very high on the subject, and rather emotional arguments came forth on both sides of the issue, from the statement that classified catalogs and indexes were not needed because living librarians were better than subject catalogs to the opinion that any intelligent man who was sufficiently interested in a subject to want to consult material on it could just as well use author entries as subject, for he would, of course, know the names of all the authors who had written in his field.

Url:
DOI: 10.1016/0099-1333(95)90097-7

Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:BC573DFE30DA86321AF40EC531407C35969695AE

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>On the subject of subjects</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Taylor, Arlene G" sort="Taylor, Arlene G" uniqKey="Taylor A" first="Arlene G." last="Taylor">Arlene G. Taylor</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>School of Library & Information Science, University of Pittsburgh, 135 N. Bellefield Ave., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, USA</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:BC573DFE30DA86321AF40EC531407C35969695AE</idno>
<date when="1995" year="1995">1995</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1016/0099-1333(95)90097-7</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/BC573DFE30DA86321AF40EC531407C35969695AE/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000196</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a">On the subject of subjects</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Taylor, Arlene G" sort="Taylor, Arlene G" uniqKey="Taylor A" first="Arlene G." last="Taylor">Arlene G. Taylor</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>School of Library & Information Science, University of Pittsburgh, 135 N. Bellefield Ave., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, USA</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">The Journal of Academic Librarianship</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">ACALIB</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0099-1333</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher>
<date type="published" when="1995">1995</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">21</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="484">484</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="491">491</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0099-1333</idno>
</series>
<idno type="istex">BC573DFE30DA86321AF40EC531407C35969695AE</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1016/0099-1333(95)90097-7</idno>
<idno type="PII">0099-1333(95)90097-7</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0099-1333</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This was a period of much argument over the relative virtues of classified and dictionary catalogs not only among librarians but among readers and scholars in general and even in reports to the House of Commons. Feelings ran very high on the subject, and rather emotional arguments came forth on both sides of the issue, from the statement that classified catalogs and indexes were not needed because living librarians were better than subject catalogs to the opinion that any intelligent man who was sufficiently interested in a subject to want to consult material on it could just as well use author entries as subject, for he would, of course, know the names of all the authors who had written in his field.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<istex>
<corpusName>elsevier</corpusName>
<author>
<json:item>
<name>Arlene G. Taylor</name>
<affiliations>
<json:string>School of Library & Information Science, University of Pittsburgh, 135 N. Bellefield Ave., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, USA</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
</author>
<language>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</language>
<originalGenre>
<json:string>Full-length article</json:string>
</originalGenre>
<abstract>This was a period of much argument over the relative virtues of classified and dictionary catalogs not only among librarians but among readers and scholars in general and even in reports to the House of Commons. Feelings ran very high on the subject, and rather emotional arguments came forth on both sides of the issue, from the statement that classified catalogs and indexes were not needed because living librarians were better than subject catalogs to the opinion that any intelligent man who was sufficiently interested in a subject to want to consult material on it could just as well use author entries as subject, for he would, of course, know the names of all the authors who had written in his field.</abstract>
<qualityIndicators>
<score>6.464</score>
<pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion>
<pdfPageSize>605 x 792 pts</pdfPageSize>
<refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative>
<keywordCount>0</keywordCount>
<abstractCharCount>710</abstractCharCount>
<pdfWordCount>7771</pdfWordCount>
<pdfCharCount>46146</pdfCharCount>
<pdfPageCount>8</pdfPageCount>
<abstractWordCount>122</abstractWordCount>
</qualityIndicators>
<title>On the subject of subjects</title>
<pii>
<json:string>0099-1333(95)90097-7</json:string>
</pii>
<genre>
<json:string>research-article</json:string>
</genre>
<serie>
<language>
<json:string>unknown</json:string>
</language>
<title>Crisis in Subject Cataloging and Retrieval</title>
</serie>
<host>
<volume>21</volume>
<pii>
<json:string>S0099-1333(00)X0048-1</json:string>
</pii>
<pages>
<last>491</last>
<first>484</first>
</pages>
<issn>
<json:string>0099-1333</json:string>
</issn>
<issue>6</issue>
<genre>
<json:string>journal</json:string>
</genre>
<language>
<json:string>unknown</json:string>
</language>
<title>The Journal of Academic Librarianship</title>
<publicationDate>1995</publicationDate>
</host>
<categories>
<wos>
<json:string>INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE</json:string>
</wos>
</categories>
<publicationDate>1995</publicationDate>
<copyrightDate>1995</copyrightDate>
<doi>
<json:string>10.1016/0099-1333(95)90097-7</json:string>
</doi>
<id>BC573DFE30DA86321AF40EC531407C35969695AE</id>
<score>0.22792943</score>
<fulltext>
<json:item>
<original>true</original>
<mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype>
<extension>pdf</extension>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/BC573DFE30DA86321AF40EC531407C35969695AE/fulltext/pdf</uri>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/zip</mimetype>
<extension>zip</extension>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/BC573DFE30DA86321AF40EC531407C35969695AE/fulltext/zip</uri>
</json:item>
<istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/BC573DFE30DA86321AF40EC531407C35969695AE/fulltext/tei">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title level="a">On the subject of subjects</title>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>ISTEX</authority>
<publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher>
<availability>
<p>ELSEVIER</p>
</availability>
<date>1995</date>
</publicationStmt>
<notesStmt>
<note type="content">Section title: Perspectives on…</note>
</notesStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct type="inbook">
<analytic>
<title level="a">On the subject of subjects</title>
<author>
<persName>
<forename type="first">Arlene G.</forename>
<surname>Taylor</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>School of Library & Information Science, University of Pittsburgh, 135 N. Bellefield Ave., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, USA</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<title level="j">The Journal of Academic Librarianship</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">ACALIB</title>
<idno type="pISSN">0099-1333</idno>
<idno type="PII">S0099-1333(00)X0048-1</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher>
<date type="published" when="1995"></date>
<biblScope unit="volume">21</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="484">484</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="491">491</biblScope>
</imprint>
</monogr>
<idno type="istex">BC573DFE30DA86321AF40EC531407C35969695AE</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1016/0099-1333(95)90097-7</idno>
<idno type="PII">0099-1333(95)90097-7</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<creation>
<date>1995</date>
</creation>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
<abstract xml:lang="en">
<p>This was a period of much argument over the relative virtues of classified and dictionary catalogs not only among librarians but among readers and scholars in general and even in reports to the House of Commons. Feelings ran very high on the subject, and rather emotional arguments came forth on both sides of the issue, from the statement that classified catalogs and indexes were not needed because living librarians were better than subject catalogs to the opinion that any intelligent man who was sufficiently interested in a subject to want to consult material on it could just as well use author entries as subject, for he would, of course, know the names of all the authors who had written in his field.</p>
</abstract>
</profileDesc>
<revisionDesc>
<change when="1995">Published</change>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
</istex:fulltextTEI>
<json:item>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>text/plain</mimetype>
<extension>txt</extension>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/BC573DFE30DA86321AF40EC531407C35969695AE/fulltext/txt</uri>
</json:item>
</fulltext>
<metadata>
<istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Elsevier, elements deleted: tail">
<istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration>
<istex:docType PUBLIC="-//ES//DTD journal article DTD version 4.5.2//EN//XML" URI="art452.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType>
<istex:document>
<converted-article version="4.5.2" docsubtype="fla">
<item-info>
<jid>ACALIB</jid>
<aid>95900977</aid>
<ce:pii>0099-1333(95)90097-7</ce:pii>
<ce:doi>10.1016/0099-1333(95)90097-7</ce:doi>
<ce:copyright type="unknown" year="1995"></ce:copyright>
</item-info>
<head>
<ce:dochead>
<ce:textfn>Perspectives on…</ce:textfn>
</ce:dochead>
<ce:title>On the subject of subjects</ce:title>
<ce:author-group>
<ce:author>
<ce:given-name>Arlene G.</ce:given-name>
<ce:surname>Taylor</ce:surname>
</ce:author>
<ce:affiliation>
<ce:textfn>School of Library & Information Science, University of Pittsburgh, 135 N. Bellefield Ave., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, USA</ce:textfn>
</ce:affiliation>
</ce:author-group>
<ce:abstract>
<ce:section-title>Abstract</ce:section-title>
<ce:abstract-sec>
<ce:simple-para>This was a period of much argument over the relative virtues of classified and dictionary catalogs not only among librarians but among readers and scholars in general and even in reports to the House of Commons. Feelings ran very high on the subject, and rather emotional arguments came forth on both sides of the issue, from the statement that classified catalogs and indexes were not needed because living librarians were better than subject catalogs to the opinion that any intelligent man who was sufficiently interested in a subject to want to consult material on it could just as well use author entries as subject, for he would, of course, know the names of all the authors who had written in his field.</ce:simple-para>
</ce:abstract-sec>
</ce:abstract>
</head>
</converted-article>
</istex:document>
</istex:metadataXml>
<mods version="3.6">
<titleInfo>
<title>On the subject of subjects</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA">
<title>On the subject of subjects</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Arlene G.</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Taylor</namePart>
<affiliation>School of Library & Information Science, University of Pittsburgh, 135 N. Bellefield Ave., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, USA</affiliation>
<role>
<roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre type="research-article" displayLabel="Full-length article"></genre>
<originInfo>
<publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1995</dateIssued>
<copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1995</copyrightDate>
</originInfo>
<language>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription>
<internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType>
</physicalDescription>
<abstract lang="en">This was a period of much argument over the relative virtues of classified and dictionary catalogs not only among librarians but among readers and scholars in general and even in reports to the House of Commons. Feelings ran very high on the subject, and rather emotional arguments came forth on both sides of the issue, from the statement that classified catalogs and indexes were not needed because living librarians were better than subject catalogs to the opinion that any intelligent man who was sufficiently interested in a subject to want to consult material on it could just as well use author entries as subject, for he would, of course, know the names of all the authors who had written in his field.</abstract>
<note type="content">Section title: Perspectives on…</note>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>The Journal of Academic Librarianship</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="abbreviated">
<title>ACALIB</title>
</titleInfo>
<genre type="journal">journal</genre>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">199511</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<identifier type="ISSN">0099-1333</identifier>
<identifier type="PII">S0099-1333(00)X0048-1</identifier>
<part>
<date>199511</date>
<detail type="volume">
<number>21</number>
<caption>vol.</caption>
</detail>
<detail type="issue">
<number>6</number>
<caption>no.</caption>
</detail>
<extent unit="issue pages">
<start>425</start>
<end>523</end>
</extent>
<extent unit="pages">
<start>484</start>
<end>491</end>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="istex">BC573DFE30DA86321AF40EC531407C35969695AE</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1016/0099-1333(95)90097-7</identifier>
<identifier type="PII">0099-1333(95)90097-7</identifier>
<recordInfo>
<recordContentSource>ELSEVIER</recordContentSource>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
</metadata>
<enrichments>
<istex:catWosTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/BC573DFE30DA86321AF40EC531407C35969695AE/enrichments/catWos">
<teiHeader>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<classCode scheme="WOS">INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE</classCode>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
</istex:catWosTEI>
</enrichments>
</istex>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Ticri/explor/TeiVM2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000196 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000196 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Ticri
   |area=    TeiVM2
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:BC573DFE30DA86321AF40EC531407C35969695AE
   |texte=   On the subject of subjects
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31.
Data generation: Mon Oct 30 21:59:18 2017. Site generation: Sun Feb 11 23:16:06 2024