Serveur d'exploration Cyberinfrastructure

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Convergent camouflage and the non‐monophyly of ‘seadragons’ (Syngnathidae: Teleostei): suggestions for a revised taxonomy of syngnathids

Identifieur interne : 000608 ( Istex/Curation ); précédent : 000607; suivant : 000609

Convergent camouflage and the non‐monophyly of ‘seadragons’ (Syngnathidae: Teleostei): suggestions for a revised taxonomy of syngnathids

Auteurs : Nerida G. Wilson ; Greg W. Rouse

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:21E6F77F54E40F62AD507A1BDC157DC413B6B7A5

Abstract

Wilson, N. G. & Rouse, G. W. (2010). Convergent camouflage and the non‐monophyly of ‘seadragons’ (Syngnathidae: Teleostei): suggestions for a revised taxonomy of syngnathids. —Zoologica Scripta, 39, 551–558. The phylogeny and classification of the charismatic Syngnathidae (e.g. pipefish, seahorses) has not been comprehensively examined to date. In particular, we assessed morphological hypotheses that previously suggested the three ‘seadragon’ genera (Phycodurus, Phyllopteryx, Haliichthys) do not form a monophyletic group. We used three mitochondrial markers to investigate evolutionary relationships within Syngnathidae, and demonstrated that Phycodurus + Phyllopteryx formed a clade that excluded Haliichthys, indicating the elaborate appendages used for camouflage have evolved independently. A time‐calibrated tree revealed the divergence of true seadragons as coincident with other kelp‐associated fauna. We found evidence for the resurrection of neglected subfamily names, and recovered Doryrhampinae, Nerophinae, Soleganthinae, Phyllopteryginae, Sygnathoidinae and Haliichthyinae as clades. Even after removing these groups from what is currently recognized as Syngnathinae, we showed that the remaining members of Syngnathinae are not monophyletic. In the light of this information, some conclusions about the diversity of reproductive strategies found within ‘Syngnathinae’ need to be re‐examined and further revision of syngnathid classification is needed.

Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-6409.2010.00449.x

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:21E6F77F54E40F62AD507A1BDC157DC413B6B7A5

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Convergent camouflage and the non‐monophyly of ‘seadragons’ (Syngnathidae: Teleostei): suggestions for a revised taxonomy of syngnathids</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Wilson, Nerida G" sort="Wilson, Nerida G" uniqKey="Wilson N" first="Nerida G." last="Wilson">Nerida G. Wilson</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Rouse, Greg W" sort="Rouse, Greg W" uniqKey="Rouse G" first="Greg W." last="Rouse">Greg W. Rouse</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:21E6F77F54E40F62AD507A1BDC157DC413B6B7A5</idno>
<date when="2010" year="2010">2010</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1463-6409.2010.00449.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/21E6F77F54E40F62AD507A1BDC157DC413B6B7A5/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000608</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000608</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Convergent camouflage and the non‐monophyly of ‘seadragons’ (Syngnathidae: Teleostei): suggestions for a revised taxonomy of syngnathids</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Wilson, Nerida G" sort="Wilson, Nerida G" uniqKey="Wilson N" first="Nerida G." last="Wilson">Nerida G. Wilson</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Rouse, Greg W" sort="Rouse, Greg W" uniqKey="Rouse G" first="Greg W." last="Rouse">Greg W. Rouse</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">Zoologica Scripta</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0300-3256</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1463-6409</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2010-11">2010-11</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">39</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="551">551</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="558">558</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0300-3256</idno>
</series>
<idno type="istex">21E6F77F54E40F62AD507A1BDC157DC413B6B7A5</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1463-6409.2010.00449.x</idno>
<idno type="ArticleID">ZSC449</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0300-3256</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Wilson, N. G. & Rouse, G. W. (2010). Convergent camouflage and the non‐monophyly of ‘seadragons’ (Syngnathidae: Teleostei): suggestions for a revised taxonomy of syngnathids. —Zoologica Scripta, 39, 551–558. The phylogeny and classification of the charismatic Syngnathidae (e.g. pipefish, seahorses) has not been comprehensively examined to date. In particular, we assessed morphological hypotheses that previously suggested the three ‘seadragon’ genera (Phycodurus, Phyllopteryx, Haliichthys) do not form a monophyletic group. We used three mitochondrial markers to investigate evolutionary relationships within Syngnathidae, and demonstrated that Phycodurus + Phyllopteryx formed a clade that excluded Haliichthys, indicating the elaborate appendages used for camouflage have evolved independently. A time‐calibrated tree revealed the divergence of true seadragons as coincident with other kelp‐associated fauna. We found evidence for the resurrection of neglected subfamily names, and recovered Doryrhampinae, Nerophinae, Soleganthinae, Phyllopteryginae, Sygnathoidinae and Haliichthyinae as clades. Even after removing these groups from what is currently recognized as Syngnathinae, we showed that the remaining members of Syngnathinae are not monophyletic. In the light of this information, some conclusions about the diversity of reproductive strategies found within ‘Syngnathinae’ need to be re‐examined and further revision of syngnathid classification is needed.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/CyberinfraV1/Data/Istex/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000608 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000608 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    CyberinfraV1
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:21E6F77F54E40F62AD507A1BDC157DC413B6B7A5
   |texte=   Convergent camouflage and the non‐monophyly of ‘seadragons’ (Syngnathidae: Teleostei): suggestions for a revised taxonomy of syngnathids
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.25.
Data generation: Thu Oct 27 09:30:58 2016. Site generation: Sun Mar 10 23:08:40 2024