Reconciling theory with observations: elements of a diagnostic approach to model evaluation
Identifieur interne : 000752 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000751; suivant : 000753Reconciling theory with observations: elements of a diagnostic approach to model evaluation
Auteurs : Hoshin V. Gupta ; Thorsten Wagener ; Yuqiong LiuSource :
- Hydrological Processes [ 0885-6087 ] ; 2008-08-30.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
This paper discusses the need for a well‐considered approach to reconciling environmental theory with observations that has clear and compelling diagnostic power. This need is well recognized by the scientific community in the context of the ‘Predictions in Ungaged Basins’ initiative and the National Science Foundation sponsored ‘Environmental Observatories’ initiative, among others. It is suggested that many current strategies for confronting environmental process models with observational data are inadequate in the face of the highly complex and high order models becoming central to modern environmental science, and steps are proposed towards the development of a robust and powerful ‘Theory of Evaluation’. This paper presents the concept of a diagnostic evaluation approach rooted in information theory and employing the notion of signature indices that measure theoretically relevant system process behaviours. The signature‐based approach addresses the issue of degree of system complexity resolvable by a model. Further, it can be placed in the context of Bayesian inference to facilitate uncertainty analysis, and can be readily applied to the problem of process evaluation leading to improved predictions in ungaged basins. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Url:
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.6989
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:BC6AA8ED4B2EC1515026CB21FACD4696946FB3FDLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Reconciling theory with observations: elements of a diagnostic approach to model evaluation</title><author><name sortKey="Gupta, Hoshin V" sort="Gupta, Hoshin V" uniqKey="Gupta H" first="Hoshin V." last="Gupta">Hoshin V. Gupta</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>SAHRA, Department of Hydrology & Water Resources, The University of Arizona, Tucson AZ 85721</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wagener, Thorsten" sort="Wagener, Thorsten" uniqKey="Wagener T" first="Thorsten" last="Wagener">Thorsten Wagener</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Liu, Yuqiong" sort="Liu, Yuqiong" uniqKey="Liu Y" first="Yuqiong" last="Liu">Yuqiong Liu</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>SAHRA, Department of Hydrology & Water Resources, The University of Arizona, Tucson AZ 85721</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:BC6AA8ED4B2EC1515026CB21FACD4696946FB3FD</idno><date when="2008" year="2008">2008</date><idno type="doi">10.1002/hyp.6989</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/BC6AA8ED4B2EC1515026CB21FACD4696946FB3FD/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000752</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Reconciling theory with observations: elements of a diagnostic approach to model evaluation</title><author><name sortKey="Gupta, Hoshin V" sort="Gupta, Hoshin V" uniqKey="Gupta H" first="Hoshin V." last="Gupta">Hoshin V. Gupta</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>SAHRA, Department of Hydrology & Water Resources, The University of Arizona, Tucson AZ 85721</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wagener, Thorsten" sort="Wagener, Thorsten" uniqKey="Wagener T" first="Thorsten" last="Wagener">Thorsten Wagener</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Liu, Yuqiong" sort="Liu, Yuqiong" uniqKey="Liu Y" first="Yuqiong" last="Liu">Yuqiong Liu</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>SAHRA, Department of Hydrology & Water Resources, The University of Arizona, Tucson AZ 85721</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Hydrological Processes</title><title level="j" type="sub">An International Journal</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Hydrol. Process.</title><idno type="ISSN">0885-6087</idno><idno type="eISSN">1099-1085</idno><imprint><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><pubPlace>Chichester, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2008-08-30">2008-08-30</date><biblScope unit="volume">22</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">18</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="3802">3802</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="3813">3813</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0885-6087</idno></series><idno type="istex">BC6AA8ED4B2EC1515026CB21FACD4696946FB3FD</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.6989</idno><idno type="ArticleID">HYP6989</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0885-6087</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>diagnosis</term><term>evaluation</term><term>information</term><term>model identification</term><term>signatures</term><term>uncertainty</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This paper discusses the need for a well‐considered approach to reconciling environmental theory with observations that has clear and compelling diagnostic power. This need is well recognized by the scientific community in the context of the ‘Predictions in Ungaged Basins’ initiative and the National Science Foundation sponsored ‘Environmental Observatories’ initiative, among others. It is suggested that many current strategies for confronting environmental process models with observational data are inadequate in the face of the highly complex and high order models becoming central to modern environmental science, and steps are proposed towards the development of a robust and powerful ‘Theory of Evaluation’. This paper presents the concept of a diagnostic evaluation approach rooted in information theory and employing the notion of signature indices that measure theoretically relevant system process behaviours. The signature‐based approach addresses the issue of degree of system complexity resolvable by a model. Further, it can be placed in the context of Bayesian inference to facilitate uncertainty analysis, and can be readily applied to the problem of process evaluation leading to improved predictions in ungaged basins. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Hoshin V. Gupta</name><affiliations><json:string>SAHRA, Department of Hydrology & Water Resources, The University of Arizona, Tucson AZ 85721</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Thorsten Wagener</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Yuqiong Liu</name><affiliations><json:string>SAHRA, Department of Hydrology & Water Resources, The University of Arizona, Tucson AZ 85721</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>model identification</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>information</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>evaluation</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>diagnosis</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>signatures</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>uncertainty</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>HYP6989</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>This paper discusses the need for a well‐considered approach to reconciling environmental theory with observations that has clear and compelling diagnostic power. This need is well recognized by the scientific community in the context of the ‘Predictions in Ungaged Basins’ initiative and the National Science Foundation sponsored ‘Environmental Observatories’ initiative, among others. It is suggested that many current strategies for confronting environmental process models with observational data are inadequate in the face of the highly complex and high order models becoming central to modern environmental science, and steps are proposed towards the development of a robust and powerful ‘Theory of Evaluation’. This paper presents the concept of a diagnostic evaluation approach rooted in information theory and employing the notion of signature indices that measure theoretically relevant system process behaviours. The signature‐based approach addresses the issue of degree of system complexity resolvable by a model. Further, it can be placed in the context of Bayesian inference to facilitate uncertainty analysis, and can be readily applied to the problem of process evaluation leading to improved predictions in ungaged basins. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.22</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>595 x 842 pts (A4)</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><keywordCount>6</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>1281</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>8200</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>53813</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>12</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>185</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Reconciling theory with observations: elements of a diagnostic approach to model evaluation</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>22</volume><publisherId><json:string>HYP</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>12</total><last>3813</last><first>3802</first></pages><issn><json:string>0885-6087</json:string></issn><issue>18</issue><subject><json:item><value>Research Article</value></json:item></subject><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1099-1085</json:string></eissn><title>Hydrological Processes</title><doi><json:string>10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1085</json:string></doi></host><publicationDate>2008</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2008</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1002/hyp.6989</json:string></doi><id>BC6AA8ED4B2EC1515026CB21FACD4696946FB3FD</id><score>0.079363</score><fulltext><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><extension>pdf</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/BC6AA8ED4B2EC1515026CB21FACD4696946FB3FD/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><extension>zip</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/BC6AA8ED4B2EC1515026CB21FACD4696946FB3FD/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/BC6AA8ED4B2EC1515026CB21FACD4696946FB3FD/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Reconciling theory with observations: elements of a diagnostic approach to model evaluation</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><pubPlace>Chichester, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p></availability><date>2008</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Reconciling theory with observations: elements of a diagnostic approach to model evaluation</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Hoshin V.</forename><surname>Gupta</surname></persName><note type="correspondence"><p>Correspondence: SAHRA, Department of Hydrology & Water Resources, The University of Arizona, Tucson AZ 85721.===</p></note><affiliation>SAHRA, Department of Hydrology & Water Resources, The University of Arizona, Tucson AZ 85721</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">Thorsten</forename><surname>Wagener</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-3"><persName><forename type="first">Yuqiong</forename><surname>Liu</surname></persName><affiliation>SAHRA, Department of Hydrology & Water Resources, The University of Arizona, Tucson AZ 85721</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Hydrological Processes</title><title level="j" type="sub">An International Journal</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Hydrol. Process.</title><idno type="pISSN">0885-6087</idno><idno type="eISSN">1099-1085</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1085</idno><imprint><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><pubPlace>Chichester, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2008-08-30"></date><biblScope unit="volume">22</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">18</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="3802">3802</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="3813">3813</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">BC6AA8ED4B2EC1515026CB21FACD4696946FB3FD</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.6989</idno><idno type="ArticleID">HYP6989</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2008</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>This paper discusses the need for a well‐considered approach to reconciling environmental theory with observations that has clear and compelling diagnostic power. This need is well recognized by the scientific community in the context of the ‘Predictions in Ungaged Basins’ initiative and the National Science Foundation sponsored ‘Environmental Observatories’ initiative, among others. It is suggested that many current strategies for confronting environmental process models with observational data are inadequate in the face of the highly complex and high order models becoming central to modern environmental science, and steps are proposed towards the development of a robust and powerful ‘Theory of Evaluation’. This paper presents the concept of a diagnostic evaluation approach rooted in information theory and employing the notion of signature indices that measure theoretically relevant system process behaviours. The signature‐based approach addresses the issue of degree of system complexity resolvable by a model. Further, it can be placed in the context of Bayesian inference to facilitate uncertainty analysis, and can be readily applied to the problem of process evaluation leading to improved predictions in ungaged basins. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p></abstract><textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>keywords</head><item><term>model identification</term></item><item><term>information</term></item><item><term>evaluation</term></item><item><term>diagnosis</term></item><item><term>signatures</term></item><item><term>uncertainty</term></item></list></keywords></textClass><textClass><keywords scheme="Journal Subject"><list><head>article-category</head><item><term>Research Article</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2007-06-26">Received</change><change when="2007-12-15">Registration</change><change when="2008-08-30">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><extension>txt</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/BC6AA8ED4B2EC1515026CB21FACD4696946FB3FD/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisherName><publisherLoc>Chichester, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi registered="yes">10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1085</doi><issn type="print">0885-6087</issn><issn type="electronic">1099-1085</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="HYP"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" xml:lang="en" sort="HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES">Hydrological Processes</title><title type="subtitle">An International Journal</title><title type="short">Hydrol. Process.</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="180"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1002/hyp.v22:18</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="22">22</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">18</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2008-08-30">30 August 2008</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="200" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1002/hyp.6989</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="HYP6989"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="12"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Research Article</title><title type="tocHeading1">Research Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="manuscriptReceived" date="2007-06-26"></event><event type="manuscriptAccepted" date="2007-12-15"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2008-03-11"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2008-03-11"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2008-08-13"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:JWSART34_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-03-06"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-24"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">3802</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">3813</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>SAHRA, Department of Hydrology & Water Resources, The University of Arizona, Tucson AZ 85721.===</correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:HYP.HYP6989.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="6"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="65"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" xml:lang="en">Reconciling theory with observations: elements of a diagnostic approach to model evaluation</title><title type="short" xml:lang="en">ELEMENTS OF A DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH TO MODEL EVALUATION</title></titleGroup><creators><creator xml:id="au1" creatorRole="author" affiliationRef="#af1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Hoshin V.</givenNames><familyName>Gupta</familyName></personName><contactDetails><email>hoshin.gupta@hwr.arizona.edu</email></contactDetails></creator><creator xml:id="au2" creatorRole="author" affiliationRef="#af2"><personName><givenNames>Thorsten</givenNames><familyName>Wagener</familyName></personName></creator><creator xml:id="au3" creatorRole="author" affiliationRef="#af1"><personName><givenNames>Yuqiong</givenNames><familyName>Liu</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="af1" countryCode="US" type="organization"><unparsedAffiliation>SAHRA, Department of Hydrology & Water Resources, The University of Arizona, Tucson AZ 85721</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="af2" countryCode="US" type="organization"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en" type="author"><keyword xml:id="kwd1">model identification</keyword><keyword xml:id="kwd2">information</keyword><keyword xml:id="kwd3">evaluation</keyword><keyword xml:id="kwd4">diagnosis</keyword><keyword xml:id="kwd5">signatures</keyword><keyword xml:id="kwd6">uncertainty</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p>This paper discusses the need for a well‐considered approach to reconciling environmental theory with observations that has clear and compelling diagnostic power. This need is well recognized by the scientific community in the context of the ‘Predictions in Ungaged Basins’ initiative and the National Science Foundation sponsored ‘Environmental Observatories’ initiative, among others. It is suggested that many current strategies for confronting environmental process models with observational data are inadequate in the face of the highly complex and high order models becoming central to modern environmental science, and steps are proposed towards the development of a robust and powerful ‘Theory of Evaluation’. This paper presents the concept of a diagnostic evaluation approach rooted in information theory and employing the notion of signature indices that measure theoretically relevant system process behaviours. The signature‐based approach addresses the issue of degree of system complexity resolvable by a model. Further, it can be placed in the context of Bayesian inference to facilitate uncertainty analysis, and can be readily applied to the problem of process evaluation leading to improved predictions in ungaged basins. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Reconciling theory with observations: elements of a diagnostic approach to model evaluation</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>ELEMENTS OF A DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH TO MODEL EVALUATION</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Reconciling theory with observations: elements of a diagnostic approach to model evaluation</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Hoshin V.</namePart><namePart type="family">Gupta</namePart><affiliation>SAHRA, Department of Hydrology & Water Resources, The University of Arizona, Tucson AZ 85721</affiliation><description>Correspondence: SAHRA, Department of Hydrology & Water Resources, The University of Arizona, Tucson AZ 85721.===</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Thorsten</namePart><namePart type="family">Wagener</namePart><affiliation>Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Yuqiong</namePart><namePart type="family">Liu</namePart><affiliation>SAHRA, Department of Hydrology & Water Resources, The University of Arizona, Tucson AZ 85721</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Chichester, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2008-08-30</dateIssued><dateCaptured encoding="w3cdtf">2007-06-26</dateCaptured><dateValid encoding="w3cdtf">2007-12-15</dateValid><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2008</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="figures">6</extent><extent unit="references">65</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">This paper discusses the need for a well‐considered approach to reconciling environmental theory with observations that has clear and compelling diagnostic power. This need is well recognized by the scientific community in the context of the ‘Predictions in Ungaged Basins’ initiative and the National Science Foundation sponsored ‘Environmental Observatories’ initiative, among others. It is suggested that many current strategies for confronting environmental process models with observational data are inadequate in the face of the highly complex and high order models becoming central to modern environmental science, and steps are proposed towards the development of a robust and powerful ‘Theory of Evaluation’. This paper presents the concept of a diagnostic evaluation approach rooted in information theory and employing the notion of signature indices that measure theoretically relevant system process behaviours. The signature‐based approach addresses the issue of degree of system complexity resolvable by a model. Further, it can be placed in the context of Bayesian inference to facilitate uncertainty analysis, and can be readily applied to the problem of process evaluation leading to improved predictions in ungaged basins. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>model identification</topic><topic>information</topic><topic>evaluation</topic><topic>diagnosis</topic><topic>signatures</topic><topic>uncertainty</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Hydrological Processes</title><subTitle>An International Journal</subTitle></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Hydrol. Process.</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Research Article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0885-6087</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1099-1085</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1085</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">HYP</identifier><part><date>2008</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>22</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>18</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>3802</start><end>3813</end><total>12</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">BC6AA8ED4B2EC1515026CB21FACD4696946FB3FD</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.6989</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">HYP6989</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><enrichments><json:item><type>multicat</type><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/BC6AA8ED4B2EC1515026CB21FACD4696946FB3FD/enrichments/multicat</uri></json:item></enrichments><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/CyberinfraV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000752 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000752 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= CyberinfraV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:BC6AA8ED4B2EC1515026CB21FACD4696946FB3FD
|texte= Reconciling theory with observations: elements of a diagnostic approach to model evaluation
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.25. |  |