Delivery of rural and remote health care via a broadband Internet Protocol network - views of potential users.
Identifieur interne : 000485 ( PubMed/Curation ); précédent : 000484; suivant : 000486Delivery of rural and remote health care via a broadband Internet Protocol network - views of potential users.
Auteurs : P. Jennett [Canada] ; M. Yeo ; R. Scott ; M. Hebert ; W. TeoSource :
- Journal of telemedicine and telecare [ 1357-633X ] ; 2005.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- MESH :
- organisation et administration : Prestations des soins de santé, Services de santé ruraux.
- Alberta, Attitude du personnel soignant, Enquêtes et questionnaires, Humains, Internet, Qualité des soins de santé, Télémédecine.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- geographic : Alberta.
- methods : Telemedicine.
- organization & administration : Delivery of Health Care, Rural Health Services.
- Attitude of Health Personnel, Humans, Internet, Quality of Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires.
Abstract
We asked the views of potential users of a proposed Canadian broadband Internet Protocol (IP) network for health, the Alberta SuperNet. The three user groups were drawn from the public, provider and private sectors. In all, 35 health-sector participants were selected (17 government, nine health-care organizations, five providers/practitioners and four private sector). The questionnaire was Web-based, semistructured and self-administered. It consisted of four major areas: value, readiness, effect on usual care and limitations. A total of 28 (80%) individuals responded to the questionnaire: 21 (81%) were from the public sector (three provincial, nine regional and nine organizational), three (60%) were from the provider sector and four (100%) were from the private sector. Overall, the items related to health services and health human resources were considered to be the most valuable to rural communities. Respondents identified the expansion of telehealth services as the most important, except those from the private sector, who ranked this a close second. The health system's move to the use of electronic health records was ranked second in importance by all respondents. The private-sector respondents viewed all user groups to be generally less ready (mean score 2.5 on a seven-point scale from 1 = not ready to 7 = ready), while the public-sector respondents were the most optimistic (mean score 4.0). Specific socioeconomic impact data were limited. The top-ranked disadvantage of the 10 suggested was that 'Changes in health-service delivery practices and/or processes will be required'.
PubMed: 16356317
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000485
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:16356317Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Delivery of rural and remote health care via a broadband Internet Protocol network - views of potential users.</title><author><name sortKey="Jennett, P" sort="Jennett, P" uniqKey="Jennett P" first="P" last="Jennett">P. Jennett</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Health Telematics Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. jennett@ucalgary.ca</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country><wicri:regionArea>Health Telematics Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Yeo, M" sort="Yeo, M" uniqKey="Yeo M" first="M" last="Yeo">M. Yeo</name></author><author><name sortKey="Scott, R" sort="Scott, R" uniqKey="Scott R" first="R" last="Scott">R. Scott</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hebert, M" sort="Hebert, M" uniqKey="Hebert M" first="M" last="Hebert">M. Hebert</name></author><author><name sortKey="Teo, W" sort="Teo, W" uniqKey="Teo W" first="W" last="Teo">W. Teo</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2005">2005</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:16356317</idno><idno type="pmid">16356317</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000485</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000485</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000485</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">000485</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Delivery of rural and remote health care via a broadband Internet Protocol network - views of potential users.</title><author><name sortKey="Jennett, P" sort="Jennett, P" uniqKey="Jennett P" first="P" last="Jennett">P. Jennett</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Health Telematics Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. jennett@ucalgary.ca</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country><wicri:regionArea>Health Telematics Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Yeo, M" sort="Yeo, M" uniqKey="Yeo M" first="M" last="Yeo">M. Yeo</name></author><author><name sortKey="Scott, R" sort="Scott, R" uniqKey="Scott R" first="R" last="Scott">R. Scott</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hebert, M" sort="Hebert, M" uniqKey="Hebert M" first="M" last="Hebert">M. Hebert</name></author><author><name sortKey="Teo, W" sort="Teo, W" uniqKey="Teo W" first="W" last="Teo">W. Teo</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of telemedicine and telecare</title><idno type="ISSN">1357-633X</idno><imprint><date when="2005" type="published">2005</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Alberta</term><term>Attitude of Health Personnel</term><term>Delivery of Health Care (organization & administration)</term><term>Humans</term><term>Internet</term><term>Quality of Health Care</term><term>Rural Health Services (organization & administration)</term><term>Surveys and Questionnaires</term><term>Telemedicine (methods)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Alberta</term><term>Attitude du personnel soignant</term><term>Enquêtes et questionnaires</term><term>Humains</term><term>Internet</term><term>Prestations des soins de santé (organisation et administration)</term><term>Qualité des soins de santé</term><term>Services de santé ruraux (organisation et administration)</term><term>Télémédecine ()</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" xml:lang="en"><term>Alberta</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Telemedicine</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="organisation et administration" xml:lang="fr"><term>Prestations des soins de santé</term><term>Services de santé ruraux</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="organization & administration" xml:lang="en"><term>Delivery of Health Care</term><term>Rural Health Services</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Attitude of Health Personnel</term><term>Humans</term><term>Internet</term><term>Quality of Health Care</term><term>Surveys and Questionnaires</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Alberta</term><term>Attitude du personnel soignant</term><term>Enquêtes et questionnaires</term><term>Humains</term><term>Internet</term><term>Qualité des soins de santé</term><term>Télémédecine</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">We asked the views of potential users of a proposed Canadian broadband Internet Protocol (IP) network for health, the Alberta SuperNet. The three user groups were drawn from the public, provider and private sectors. In all, 35 health-sector participants were selected (17 government, nine health-care organizations, five providers/practitioners and four private sector). The questionnaire was Web-based, semistructured and self-administered. It consisted of four major areas: value, readiness, effect on usual care and limitations. A total of 28 (80%) individuals responded to the questionnaire: 21 (81%) were from the public sector (three provincial, nine regional and nine organizational), three (60%) were from the provider sector and four (100%) were from the private sector. Overall, the items related to health services and health human resources were considered to be the most valuable to rural communities. Respondents identified the expansion of telehealth services as the most important, except those from the private sector, who ranked this a close second. The health system's move to the use of electronic health records was ranked second in importance by all respondents. The private-sector respondents viewed all user groups to be generally less ready (mean score 2.5 on a seven-point scale from 1 = not ready to 7 = ready), while the public-sector respondents were the most optimistic (mean score 4.0). Specific socioeconomic impact data were limited. The top-ranked disadvantage of the 10 suggested was that 'Changes in health-service delivery practices and/or processes will be required'.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">16356317</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2005</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>16</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2006</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>25</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2015</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>19</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">1357-633X</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>11</Volume><Issue>8</Issue><PubDate><Year>2005</Year></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Journal of telemedicine and telecare</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J Telemed Telecare</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Delivery of rural and remote health care via a broadband Internet Protocol network - views of potential users.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>419-24</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>We asked the views of potential users of a proposed Canadian broadband Internet Protocol (IP) network for health, the Alberta SuperNet. The three user groups were drawn from the public, provider and private sectors. In all, 35 health-sector participants were selected (17 government, nine health-care organizations, five providers/practitioners and four private sector). The questionnaire was Web-based, semistructured and self-administered. It consisted of four major areas: value, readiness, effect on usual care and limitations. A total of 28 (80%) individuals responded to the questionnaire: 21 (81%) were from the public sector (three provincial, nine regional and nine organizational), three (60%) were from the provider sector and four (100%) were from the private sector. Overall, the items related to health services and health human resources were considered to be the most valuable to rural communities. Respondents identified the expansion of telehealth services as the most important, except those from the private sector, who ranked this a close second. The health system's move to the use of electronic health records was ranked second in importance by all respondents. The private-sector respondents viewed all user groups to be generally less ready (mean score 2.5 on a seven-point scale from 1 = not ready to 7 = ready), while the public-sector respondents were the most optimistic (mean score 4.0). Specific socioeconomic impact data were limited. The top-ranked disadvantage of the 10 suggested was that 'Changes in health-service delivery practices and/or processes will be required'.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Jennett</LastName><ForeName>P</ForeName><Initials>P</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Health Telematics Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. jennett@ucalgary.ca</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Yeo</LastName><ForeName>M</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Scott</LastName><ForeName>R</ForeName><Initials>R</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Hebert</LastName><ForeName>M</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Teo</LastName><ForeName>W</ForeName><Initials>W</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D023362">Evaluation Studies</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>J Telemed Telecare</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9506702</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1357-633X</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic" UI="D000416">Alberta</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D001291">Attitude of Health Personnel</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D003695">Delivery of Health Care</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000458">organization & administration</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D020407">Internet</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D011787">Quality of Health Care</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D019035">Rural Health Services</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000458">organization & administration</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D011795">Surveys and Questionnaires</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D017216">Telemedicine</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000379">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2005</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>17</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2006</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>26</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2005</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>17</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16356317</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/TelematiV1/Data/PubMed/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000485 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000485 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= TelematiV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:16356317
|texte= Delivery of rural and remote health care via a broadband Internet Protocol network - views of potential users.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:16356317" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a TelematiV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |