Serveur d'exploration sur la télématique

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Conceptual Models in Health Informatics Research: A Literature Review and Suggestions for Development

Identifieur interne : 000069 ( Pmc/Corpus ); précédent : 000068; suivant : 000070

Conceptual Models in Health Informatics Research: A Literature Review and Suggestions for Development

Auteurs :

Source :

RBID : PMC:4785238

Abstract

Background

Contributing to health informatics research means using conceptual models that are integrative and explain the research in terms of the two broad domains of health science and information science. However, it can be hard for novice health informatics researchers to find exemplars and guidelines in working with integrative conceptual models.

Objectives

The aim of this paper is to support the use of integrative conceptual models in research on information and communication technologies in the health sector, and to encourage discussion of these conceptual models in scholarly forums.

Methods

A two-part method was used to summarize and structure ideas about how to work effectively with conceptual models in health informatics research that included (1) a selective review and summary of the literature of conceptual models; and (2) the construction of a step-by-step approach to developing a conceptual model.

Results

The seven-step methodology for developing conceptual models in health informatics research explained in this paper involves (1) acknowledging the limitations of health science and information science conceptual models; (2) giving a rationale for one’s choice of integrative conceptual model; (3) explicating a conceptual model verbally and graphically; (4) seeking feedback about the conceptual model from stakeholders in both the health science and information science domains; (5) aligning a conceptual model with an appropriate research plan; (6) adapting a conceptual model in response to new knowledge over time; and (7) disseminating conceptual models in scholarly and scientific forums.

Conclusions

Making explicit the conceptual model that underpins a health informatics research project can contribute to increasing the number of well-formed and strongly grounded health informatics research projects. This explication has distinct benefits for researchers in training, research teams, and researchers and practitioners in information, health, and other disciplines.


Url:
DOI: 10.2196/medinform.5021
PubMed: 26912288
PubMed Central: 4785238

Links to Exploration step

PMC:4785238

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Conceptual Models in Health Informatics Research: A Literature Review and Suggestions for Development</title>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno>
<idno type="pmid">26912288</idno>
<idno type="pmc">4785238</idno>
<idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4785238</idno>
<idno type="RBID">PMC:4785238</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.2196/medinform.5021</idno>
<date when="2016">2016</date>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">000069</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">000069</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Conceptual Models in Health Informatics Research: A Literature Review and Suggestions for Development</title>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">JMIR Medical Informatics</title>
<idno type="eISSN">2291-9694</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2016">2016</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">
<sec sec-type="background">
<title>Background</title>
<p>Contributing to health informatics research means using conceptual models that are integrative and explain the research in terms of the two broad domains of health science and information science. However, it can be hard for novice health informatics researchers to find exemplars and guidelines in working with integrative conceptual models.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="objectives">
<title>Objectives</title>
<p>The aim of this paper is to support the use of integrative conceptual models in research on information and communication technologies in the health sector, and to encourage discussion of these conceptual models in scholarly forums.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="methods">
<title>Methods</title>
<p>A two-part method was used to summarize and structure ideas about how to work effectively with conceptual models in health informatics research that included (1) a selective review and summary of the literature of conceptual models; and (2) the construction of a step-by-step approach to developing a conceptual model.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<p>The seven-step methodology for developing conceptual models in health informatics research explained in this paper involves (1) acknowledging the limitations of health science and information science conceptual models; (2) giving a rationale for one’s choice of integrative conceptual model; (3) explicating a conceptual model verbally and graphically; (4) seeking feedback about the conceptual model from stakeholders in both the health science and information science domains; (5) aligning a conceptual model with an appropriate research plan; (6) adapting a conceptual model in response to new knowledge over time; and (7) disseminating conceptual models in scholarly and scientific forums.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions">
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>Making explicit the conceptual model that underpins a health informatics research project can contribute to increasing the number of well-formed and strongly grounded health informatics research projects. This explication has distinct benefits for researchers in training, research teams, and researchers and practitioners in information, health, and other disciplines.</p>
</sec>
</div>
</front>
<back>
<div1 type="bibliography">
<listBibl>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kulikowski, Ca" uniqKey="Kulikowski C">CA Kulikowski</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Shortliffe, Eh" uniqKey="Shortliffe E">EH Shortliffe</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Currie, Lm" uniqKey="Currie L">LM Currie</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Elkin, Pl" uniqKey="Elkin P">PL Elkin</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Hunter, Le" uniqKey="Hunter L">LE Hunter</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Johnson, Tr" uniqKey="Johnson T">TR Johnson</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kalet, Ij" uniqKey="Kalet I">IJ Kalet</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Lenert, La" uniqKey="Lenert L">LA Lenert</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Musen, Ma" uniqKey="Musen M">MA Musen</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Ozbolt, Jg" uniqKey="Ozbolt J">JG Ozbolt</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Smith, Jw" uniqKey="Smith J">JW Smith</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Tarczy Hornoch, Pz" uniqKey="Tarczy Hornoch P">PZ Tarczy-Hornoch</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Williamson, Jj" uniqKey="Williamson J">JJ Williamson</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Friedman, Cp" uniqKey="Friedman C">CP Friedman</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Currie, Lm" uniqKey="Currie L">LM Currie</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Zhang, Mw" uniqKey="Zhang M">MW Zhang</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Tsang, T" uniqKey="Tsang T">T Tsang</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Cheow, E" uniqKey="Cheow E">E Cheow</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Ho, Cs" uniqKey="Ho C">CS Ho</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Yeong, Nb" uniqKey="Yeong N">NB Yeong</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Ho, Rc" uniqKey="Ho R">RC Ho</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Green, He" uniqKey="Green H">HE Green</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="De Vries, Jjg" uniqKey="De Vries J">JJG de Vries</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Geleijnse, G" uniqKey="Geleijnse G">G Geleijnse</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Tesanovic, A" uniqKey="Tesanovic A">A Tesanovic</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Van De Ven, Art" uniqKey="Van De Ven A">ART van de Ven</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Jiang, Ca" uniqKey="Jiang C">CA Jiang</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Leong, Ty" uniqKey="Leong T">TY Leong</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Poh, Kl" uniqKey="Poh K">KL Poh</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Michel, G" uniqKey="Michel G">G Michel</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Marcy, T" uniqKey="Marcy T">T Marcy</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Shiffman, Rn" uniqKey="Shiffman R">RN Shiffman</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Van Gemert Pijnen, Je" uniqKey="Van Gemert Pijnen J">JE van Gemert-Pijnen</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Nijland, N" uniqKey="Nijland N">N Nijland</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Van, Lm" uniqKey="Van L">LM van</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Ossebaard, Hc" uniqKey="Ossebaard H">HC Ossebaard</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kelders, Sm" uniqKey="Kelders S">SM Kelders</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Eysenbach, G" uniqKey="Eysenbach G">G Eysenbach</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Seydel, Er" uniqKey="Seydel E">ER Seydel</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bossen, C" uniqKey="Bossen C">C Bossen</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Jensen, Lg" uniqKey="Jensen L">LG Jensen</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Udsen, Fw" uniqKey="Udsen F">FW Udsen</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Yusof, Mm" uniqKey="Yusof M">MM Yusof</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kuljis, J" uniqKey="Kuljis J">J Kuljis</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Papazafeiropoulou, A" uniqKey="Papazafeiropoulou A">A Papazafeiropoulou</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Stergioulas, Lk" uniqKey="Stergioulas L">LK Stergioulas</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Gordon, C" uniqKey="Gordon C">C Gordon</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Herbert, I" uniqKey="Herbert I">I Herbert</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Johnson, P" uniqKey="Johnson P">P Johnson</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Nicklin, P" uniqKey="Nicklin P">P Nicklin</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Pitty, D" uniqKey="Pitty D">D Pitty</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Reeves, P" uniqKey="Reeves P">P Reeves</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Ruland, Cm" uniqKey="Ruland C">CM Ruland</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bakken, S" uniqKey="Bakken S">S Bakken</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kaplan, B" uniqKey="Kaplan B">B Kaplan</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Shaw, N" uniqKey="Shaw N">N Shaw</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Yusof, Mm" uniqKey="Yusof M">MM Yusof</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Papazafeiropoulou, A" uniqKey="Papazafeiropoulou A">A Papazafeiropoulou</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Paul, Rj" uniqKey="Paul R">RJ Paul</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Stergioulas, Lk" uniqKey="Stergioulas L">LK Stergioulas</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Fook, J" uniqKey="Fook J">J Fook</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="White, S" uniqKey="White S">S White</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Gardner, F" uniqKey="Gardner F">F Gardner</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Shields, P" uniqKey="Shields P">P Shields</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Rangarajan, N" uniqKey="Rangarajan N">N Rangarajan</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Helitzer, Dl" uniqKey="Helitzer D">DL Helitzer</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Sussman, Al" uniqKey="Sussman A">AL Sussman</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Hoffman, Rm" uniqKey="Hoffman R">RM Hoffman</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Getrich, Cm" uniqKey="Getrich C">CM Getrich</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Warner, Td" uniqKey="Warner T">TD Warner</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Rhyne, Rl" uniqKey="Rhyne R">RL Rhyne</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Thalheim, B" uniqKey="Thalheim B">B Thalheim</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Poelmans, J" uniqKey="Poelmans J">J Poelmans</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Dedene, G" uniqKey="Dedene G">G Dedene</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Snoeck, M" uniqKey="Snoeck M">M Snoeck</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Viaene, S" uniqKey="Viaene S">S Viaene</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Tamzalit, D" uniqKey="Tamzalit D">D Tamzalit</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Sch Tz, B" uniqKey="Sch Tz B">B Schätz</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Pierantonio, A" uniqKey="Pierantonio A">A Pierantonio</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Deridder, D" uniqKey="Deridder D">D Deridder</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Thomas, O" uniqKey="Thomas O">O Thomas</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Vom Brocke, J" uniqKey="Vom Brocke J">J vom Brocke</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kim, J" uniqKey="Kim J">J Kim</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Larson, Js" uniqKey="Larson J">JS Larson</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Aluttis, C" uniqKey="Aluttis C">C Aluttis</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Den Broucke, Sv" uniqKey="Den Broucke S">SV den Broucke</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Chiotan, C" uniqKey="Chiotan C">C Chiotan</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Costongs, C" uniqKey="Costongs C">C Costongs</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Michelsen, K" uniqKey="Michelsen K">K Michelsen</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Brand, H" uniqKey="Brand H">H Brand</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Banzi, R" uniqKey="Banzi R">R Banzi</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Moja, L" uniqKey="Moja L">L Moja</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Pistotti, V" uniqKey="Pistotti V">V Pistotti</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Facchini, A" uniqKey="Facchini A">A Facchini</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Liberati, A" uniqKey="Liberati A">A Liberati</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Courtney, Lg" uniqKey="Courtney L">LG Courtney</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Caltabiano, Nj" uniqKey="Caltabiano N">NJ Caltabiano</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Caltabiano, Ml" uniqKey="Caltabiano M">ML Caltabiano</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Marmor, T" uniqKey="Marmor T">T Marmor</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Wendt, C" uniqKey="Wendt C">C Wendt</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kruse, Cs" uniqKey="Kruse C">CS Kruse</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Deshazo, J" uniqKey="Deshazo J">J DeShazo</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kim, F" uniqKey="Kim F">F Kim</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Fulton, L" uniqKey="Fulton L">L Fulton</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Cresswell, K" uniqKey="Cresswell K">K Cresswell</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Sheikh, A" uniqKey="Sheikh A">A Sheikh</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="De Marco, M" uniqKey="De Marco M">M De Marco</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Ricciardi, F" uniqKey="Ricciardi F">F Ricciardi</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Vom Brocke, J" uniqKey="Vom Brocke J">J Vom Brocke</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Mohr, Dc" uniqKey="Mohr D">DC Mohr</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Schueller, Sm" uniqKey="Schueller S">SM Schueller</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Montague, E" uniqKey="Montague E">E Montague</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Burns, Mn" uniqKey="Burns M">MN Burns</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Rashidi, P" uniqKey="Rashidi P">P Rashidi</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Morrison, Lg" uniqKey="Morrison L">LG Morrison</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Yardley, L" uniqKey="Yardley L">L Yardley</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Powell, J" uniqKey="Powell J">J Powell</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Michie, S" uniqKey="Michie S">S Michie</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Rippen, He" uniqKey="Rippen H">HE Rippen</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Pan, Ec" uniqKey="Pan E">EC Pan</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Russell, C" uniqKey="Russell C">C Russell</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Byrne, Cm" uniqKey="Byrne C">CM Byrne</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Swift, Ek" uniqKey="Swift E">EK Swift</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Merolli, M" uniqKey="Merolli M">M Merolli</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Gray, K" uniqKey="Gray K">K Gray</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Martin Sanchez, F" uniqKey="Martin Sanchez F">F Martin-Sanchez</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Sockolow, Ps" uniqKey="Sockolow P">PS Sockolow</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Crawford, Pr" uniqKey="Crawford P">PR Crawford</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Lehmann, Hp" uniqKey="Lehmann H">HP Lehmann</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Price, M" uniqKey="Price M">M Price</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Lau, F" uniqKey="Lau F">F Lau</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Alzougool, B" uniqKey="Alzougool B">B Alzougool</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Chang, S" uniqKey="Chang S">S Chang</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Gray, K" uniqKey="Gray K">K Gray</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Eppler, M" uniqKey="Eppler M">M Eppler</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Snyder, J" uniqKey="Snyder J">J Snyder</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="West, Vl" uniqKey="West V">VL West</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Borland, D" uniqKey="Borland D">D Borland</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Hammond, We" uniqKey="Hammond W">WE Hammond</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Zhang, Z" uniqKey="Zhang Z">Z Zhang</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Wang, B" uniqKey="Wang B">B Wang</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Ahmed, F" uniqKey="Ahmed F">F Ahmed</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Ramakrishnan, Iv" uniqKey="Ramakrishnan I">IV Ramakrishnan</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Zhao, R" uniqKey="Zhao R">R Zhao</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Viccellio, A" uniqKey="Viccellio A">A Viccellio</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Mueller, K" uniqKey="Mueller K">K Mueller</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Belanger, E" uniqKey="Belanger E">E Bélanger</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bartlett, G" uniqKey="Bartlett G">G Bartlett</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Dawes, M" uniqKey="Dawes M">M Dawes</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Rodriguez, C" uniqKey="Rodriguez C">C Rodríguez</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Hasson Gidoni, I" uniqKey="Hasson Gidoni I">I Hasson-Gidoni</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Sinclair, M" uniqKey="Sinclair M">M Sinclair</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Moody, Dl" uniqKey="Moody D">DL Moody</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="O Connor, Y" uniqKey="O Connor Y">Y O'Connor</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="O Reilly, P" uniqKey="O Reilly P">P O'Reilly</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="O Donoghue, J" uniqKey="O Donoghue J">J O'Donoghue</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Garcia Smith, D" uniqKey="Garcia Smith D">D Garcia-Smith</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Effken, Ja" uniqKey="Effken J">JA Effken</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Lwoga, E" uniqKey="Lwoga E">E Lwoga</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Questier, F" uniqKey="Questier F">F Questier</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Scott, P" uniqKey="Scott P">P Scott</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Briggs, J" uniqKey="Briggs J">J Briggs</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Wyatt, J" uniqKey="Wyatt J">J Wyatt</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Georgiou, A" uniqKey="Georgiou A">A Georgiou</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Heath, M" uniqKey="Heath M">M Heath</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Appen, R" uniqKey="Appen R">R Appen</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Paez, K" uniqKey="Paez K">K Paez</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Roper, Ra" uniqKey="Roper R">RA Roper</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Andrews, Rm" uniqKey="Andrews R">RM Andrews</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Messeri, P" uniqKey="Messeri P">P Messeri</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Khan, S" uniqKey="Khan S">S Khan</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Millery, M" uniqKey="Millery M">M Millery</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Campbell, A" uniqKey="Campbell A">A Campbell</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Merrill, J" uniqKey="Merrill J">J Merrill</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Shih, S" uniqKey="Shih S">S Shih</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kukafka, R" uniqKey="Kukafka R">R Kukafka</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Harrison, Mi" uniqKey="Harrison M">MI Harrison</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Koppel, R" uniqKey="Koppel R">R Koppel</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bar Lev, S" uniqKey="Bar Lev S">S Bar-Lev</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Haddad, P" uniqKey="Haddad P">P Haddad</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Wickramasinghe, N" uniqKey="Wickramasinghe N">N Wickramasinghe</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Olla, P" uniqKey="Olla P">P Olla</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Butrico, C" uniqKey="Butrico C">C Butrico</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Pichette, C" uniqKey="Pichette C">C Pichette</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Mburu, S" uniqKey="Mburu S">S Mburu</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Franz, E" uniqKey="Franz E">E Franz</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Springer, T" uniqKey="Springer T">T Springer</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Williams, P" uniqKey="Williams P">P Williams</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Maeder, A" uniqKey="Maeder A">A Maeder</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Ritz, D" uniqKey="Ritz D">D Ritz</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Unertl, Km" uniqKey="Unertl K">KM Unertl</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Novak, Ll" uniqKey="Novak L">LL Novak</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Johnson, Kb" uniqKey="Johnson K">KB Johnson</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Lorenzi, Nm" uniqKey="Lorenzi N">NM Lorenzi</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Sanderson, P" uniqKey="Sanderson P">P Sanderson</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Xiao, T" uniqKey="Xiao T">T Xiao</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Freeman, C" uniqKey="Freeman C">C Freeman</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Broxham, W" uniqKey="Broxham W">W Broxham</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl>
</div1>
</back>
</TEI>
<pmc article-type="research-article">
<pmc-dir>properties open_access</pmc-dir>
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">JMIR Med Inform</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">JMIR Med Inform</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMI</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>JMIR Medical Informatics</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2291-9694</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Gunther Eysenbach</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>JMIR Publications Inc., Toronto, Canada</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="pmid">26912288</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="pmc">4785238</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">v4i1e7</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2196/medinform.5021</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Original Paper</subject>
</subj-group>
<subj-group subj-group-type="article-type">
<subject>Original Paper</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Conceptual Models in Health Informatics Research: A Literature Review and Suggestions for Development</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Eysenbach</surname>
<given-names>Gunther</given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="reviewer">
<name>
<surname>Schulz</surname>
<given-names>Peter</given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="reviewer">
<name>
<surname>Moja</surname>
<given-names>Lorenzo</given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="reviewer">
<name>
<surname>Lorenzo</surname>
<given-names>Marien</given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib id="contrib1" contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" equal-contrib="yes">
<name>
<surname>Gray</surname>
<given-names>Kathleen</given-names>
</name>
<degrees>PhD</degrees>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
<address>
<institution>Health and Biomedical Informatics Centre</institution>
<institution>University of Melbourne</institution>
<addr-line>Level 1</addr-line>
<addr-line>202 Berkeley Street</addr-line>
<addr-line>Melbourne, 3010</addr-line>
<country>Australia</country>
<phone>61 3 8344 8936</phone>
<fax>61 3 8344 8936</fax>
<email>kgray@unimelb.edu.au</email>
</address>
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1616-2170</contrib-id>
</contrib>
<contrib id="contrib2" contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes">
<name>
<surname>Sockolow</surname>
<given-names>Paulina</given-names>
</name>
<degrees>DrPH</degrees>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0786-1367</contrib-id>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Health and Biomedical Informatics Centre</institution>
<institution>University of Melbourne</institution>
<addr-line>Melbourne</addr-line>
<country>Australia</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Health Systems & Sciences Research</institution>
<institution>College of Nursing and Health Professions</institution>
<institution>Drexel University</institution>
<addr-line>Philadelphia, PA</addr-line>
<country>United States</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp>Corresponding Author: Kathleen Gray
<email>kgray@unimelb.edu.au</email>
</corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<season>Jan-Mar</season>
<year>2016</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>24</day>
<month>2</month>
<year>2016</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>4</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<elocation-id>e7</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>11</day>
<month>8</month>
<year>2015</year>
</date>
<date date-type="rev-request">
<day>17</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2015</year>
</date>
<date date-type="rev-recd">
<day>10</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2015</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>3</day>
<month>1</month>
<year>2016</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>©Kathleen Gray, Paulina Sockolow. Originally published in JMIR Medical Informatics (http://medinform.jmir.org), 24.02.2016. </copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2016</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
<license-p>
<pmc-comment>CREATIVE COMMONS</pmc-comment>
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/</ext-link>
), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Medical Informatics, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://medinform.jmir.org/,">http://medinform.jmir.org/,</ext-link>
as well as this copyright and license information must be included.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="http://medinform.jmir.org/2016/1/e7/"></self-uri>
<abstract>
<sec sec-type="background">
<title>Background</title>
<p>Contributing to health informatics research means using conceptual models that are integrative and explain the research in terms of the two broad domains of health science and information science. However, it can be hard for novice health informatics researchers to find exemplars and guidelines in working with integrative conceptual models.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="objectives">
<title>Objectives</title>
<p>The aim of this paper is to support the use of integrative conceptual models in research on information and communication technologies in the health sector, and to encourage discussion of these conceptual models in scholarly forums.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="methods">
<title>Methods</title>
<p>A two-part method was used to summarize and structure ideas about how to work effectively with conceptual models in health informatics research that included (1) a selective review and summary of the literature of conceptual models; and (2) the construction of a step-by-step approach to developing a conceptual model.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<p>The seven-step methodology for developing conceptual models in health informatics research explained in this paper involves (1) acknowledging the limitations of health science and information science conceptual models; (2) giving a rationale for one’s choice of integrative conceptual model; (3) explicating a conceptual model verbally and graphically; (4) seeking feedback about the conceptual model from stakeholders in both the health science and information science domains; (5) aligning a conceptual model with an appropriate research plan; (6) adapting a conceptual model in response to new knowledge over time; and (7) disseminating conceptual models in scholarly and scientific forums.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions">
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>Making explicit the conceptual model that underpins a health informatics research project can contribute to increasing the number of well-formed and strongly grounded health informatics research projects. This explication has distinct benefits for researchers in training, research teams, and researchers and practitioners in information, health, and other disciplines.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>medical informatics</kwd>
<kwd>theoretical models</kwd>
<kwd>conceptual framework</kwd>
<kwd>conceptual model</kwd>
<kwd>design-based research</kwd>
<kwd>implementation research</kwd>
<kwd>evaluation research</kwd>
<kwd>health informatics</kwd>
<kwd>research design</kwd>
<kwd>research training</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="introduction">
<title>Introduction</title>
<sec>
<title>Conceptualizing Research in Health Informatics</title>
<p>There is consensus that the discipline of health informatics is characterized by the integration of elements from many other fields of knowledge. The components of health informatics, apart from the biomedical sciences, include computer science, information science, decision science, statistics, cognitive science, organizational theory, and others [
<xref rid="ref1" ref-type="bibr">1</xref>
]. In essence, health informatics is “cross-training” between broadly defined information sciences and health sciences [
<xref rid="ref2" ref-type="bibr">2</xref>
].</p>
<p>Ideally, research rests on “methodologies that capture the processes integral to applications, the users and the world in which the users function” [
<xref rid="ref3" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>
]. However, a growing number of researchers who do not identify themselves as health informaticians are now doing research into the design, implementation, and evaluation of information and communication technologies in the health sector. This growth is fuelled by new technologies that reduce the health professionals’ barriers to application development, and also by the growing market for consumer technologies that are not subject to medical device regulations. For example, the current emergence of apps for mobile phones and the increased ease of programming these apps is said to "enable busy clinicians to develop simple mobile Web-based apps for academic, educational, and research purposes, without any prior knowledge of programming" [
<xref rid="ref4" ref-type="bibr">4</xref>
]. The ensuing research appears in the journal and conference literature of a variety of fields including clinical specialties, health policy, information management, and software engineering, to name a few. This paper is aimed at researchers still in training, or practitioners new to the field who wish to align their work more strongly with the discipline of health informatics.</p>
<p>Taking a disciplined approach to health informatics research means operating across the component domains of expertise by using integrative conceptual models. A working definition of a conceptual model is that it is an explanation of the researcher’s thinking about the key constituents of the research problem, and why the whole problem is greater than the sum of its parts because of the way these interconnect and interact. In any field of knowledge, using a conceptual model to describe something about a subset or an aspect of the domain has value; that is, a conceptual model makes explicit the intended meaning of terms and concepts used and avoids ambiguity and misinterpretation. The terms conceptual framework and conceptual model are used interchangeably in the literature [
<xref rid="ref5" ref-type="bibr">5</xref>
], and we use the latter throughout this paper. Health informatics conceptual models that connect the knowledge and thus explain the research in the language of two broad domains, health science and information science, can help to ensure that research is effective and has impact.</p>
<p>Too often, research on information and communication technologies in the health sector appears to miss either the health problem or the information technology problem. Some examples of missing the health problem are: a review of 55 heart failure risk computational models noted that few had been implemented in clinical practice [
<xref rid="ref6" ref-type="bibr">6</xref>
]; a description of a technical solution to a perceived clinical problem omitted any mention of consultation with clinical experts [
<xref rid="ref7" ref-type="bibr">7</xref>
]; and a description of a technical solution to a clinical issue did not fit the clinical workflow [
<xref rid="ref8" ref-type="bibr">8</xref>
]. If the research does not capture the processes integral to both the world of health science and the world of information science, valuable efforts are expended developing applications that do not address the intended problem. Many innovations fail to achieve sustainability or other measures of success because “the current development of eHealth technology often disregards the interdependencies between technology, human characteristics, and the socioeconomic environment, resulting in technology that has a low impact in health care practices” [
<xref rid="ref9" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>
]. Evaluation research too may fall short of offering key insights. For example, researchers who evaluated an electronic health record implementation using the Delone and McLean framework for evaluating generic information systems success recognized that they would have done better to develop a more health-specific approach to evaluation [
<xref rid="ref10" ref-type="bibr">10</xref>
], and indeed other researchers had customized Delone and McLean for evaluating health-specific information systems [
<xref rid="ref11" ref-type="bibr">11</xref>
].</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Recognizing Conceptual Models in Health Informatics Research</title>
<p>Researchers new to the field of health informatics need to learn how to work with its conceptual models. However, this may not be taught formally, and exemplars and guidance in the literature are sporadic and scattered. Possibly due to publication word limits, much of the published health informatics research conveys an absence of discussion, even a lack of awareness, about the importance of conceptual models. In addition, papers may mention a conceptual model approach without specifying how it came into existence.</p>
<p>Some descriptions of the development of conceptual models in specific health informatics research studies are available. Gordon et al described how models of clinical guideline knowledge had to be integrated with models of health care activities and processes in a conceptual model approach for automating distribution of clinical guidelines [
<xref rid="ref12" ref-type="bibr">12</xref>
], and Ruland and Bakken enumerated the components of a conceptual model to support inclusion of patient preferences in clinical decision making and underscored the importance of incorporating knowledge from four domains [
<xref rid="ref13" ref-type="bibr">13</xref>
]. In addition, Kaplan and Shaw compared a variety of ways that evaluation researchers have conceptualized the complex social and institutional dynamics of health information technology implementations [
<xref rid="ref14" ref-type="bibr">14</xref>
], and Yusof et al [
<xref rid="ref15" ref-type="bibr">15</xref>
] explained how theories from information science and evidence from health science informed the structure of a human-, organization-, and technology-fit evaluation framework for health information systems. There is no single right or wrong conceptual model that brings order to a set of ideas about a health informatics problem. The exercise of making the conceptual model explicit in a study, in words and/or figures, is critical to clarify what is known and to identify what is in question or not known, from the perspective of the researchers. Through the process of debating the merits of alternative conceptual models, their explanatory power, completeness, and other aspects about how well they represent the research objectives, new theories are formed.</p>
<p>This paper aims to promote more explicit use of health informatics conceptual models in research on information and communication technologies in the health sector, and encourage discussion of these conceptual models in scholarly forums. Learning how to develop and apply integrative conceptual models is an educational issue for researchers in training, and so too for those who train them and those who review their work. Using conceptual models has research significance for building the discipline of health informatics and benefits for many stakeholders in health informatics research.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="methods">
<title>Methods</title>
<p>A two-part method was used to structure and illustrate ideas of how to work effectively with conceptual models in health informatics research. First, we conducted a search of the literature of conceptual models, and then we used a qualitative research process to formulate a step-by-step approach to developing a conceptual model.</p>
<p>We looked for papers published up to 2014 that described the development of conceptual models in health information science and technology research in PubMed, IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, Scopus, and Web of Knowledge. First the Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) "models, theoretical" paired with "medical informatics" were used. Then search terms were widened to include "research design" (especially where there was discussion of why a design was chosen). An additional search looked for possible pairings of "design science" or "design-based research", "implementation", and "evaluation" with health information systems and technology and with electronic health (e-health). Selection of a cross-section of full papers that made substantial mention of conceptual models was based on reading abstracts and also on mining reference lists from selected papers for further examples.</p>
<p>Critical reflection was used to formulate a step-by-step approach to developing a conceptual model. We examined the assumptions embedded in our experiences, associated them with a range of different factors, re-evaluated them using external reference points, and re-worked our ideas and practices [
<xref rid="ref16" ref-type="bibr">16</xref>
]. Specifically, we drew on our separate experiences working in multidisciplinary health information technology research teams internationally over five years. We reconsidered the bases of our expertise as researchers and also as reviewers, supervisors, advisors, and examiners of research in health informatics. We analyzed the literature we had retrieved, looking at ways authors named, explicated, and sequenced key components in the development of a conceptual model. We agreed on specific steps in development of a conceptual model and went back to the literature and to our experience repeatedly for examples.</p>
<p>Using this method, we produced a set of suggestions, which remains untested in terms of its technical validity and sufficiency. Nevertheless, after formulating these suggestions, we found that teaching novice researchers to use conceptual models in a step-wise manner is recognized as effective by academics in other fields [
<xref rid="ref17" ref-type="bibr">17</xref>
]. We also found that a similar idea had appeared in the literature of a different field of health research, namely health program evaluation [
<xref rid="ref18" ref-type="bibr">18</xref>
]. The existence of these peer-reviewed publications added external validity to our method.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<p>The process of critical review and reflection led us to a consensus that supported a seven-step approach to developing a conceptual model for health informatics research. In this section we offer these steps and examples from the literature as a guide to the novice health informatics researcher. The methodology for working with conceptual models in health informatics involves (1) acknowledging the limitations of health science and information science conceptual models; (2) giving a rationale for one’s choice of an integrative conceptual model; (3) explicating a conceptual model verbally and graphically; (4) seeking feedback about a conceptual model from stakeholders in both the health science and information science domains; (5) aligning a conceptual model with an appropriate research plan; (6) adapting a conceptual model in response to new knowledge over time; and (7) disseminating conceptual models in scholarly and scientific forums.</p>
<sec>
<title>Acknowledge the Conceptual Models of Contributing Domains</title>
<p>It is important to acknowledge that both health science and information science use a variety of conceptual models to represent entities and relationships in their respective domains; however, these fields of knowledge are differentiated by their approaches to conceptualizing problems. A defining characteristic of any given health informatics research problem is how it responds to the challenge to acknowledge the applicability and also the inadequacy of conceptual models from both health science and information science. That is, you should be able to describe some parts of the research question using concepts that appropriately represent the problem to the separate audiences or stakeholders from each domain. You must also go beyond this, to frame the problem in a conceptual model that transcends and integrates these domains.</p>
<p>In the information sciences, a conceptual model may also be referred to as a domain model. Furthermore, conceptual modeling should not be confused with other modeling disciplines, such as data modeling, logic modeling, or physical modeling. Many different conceptual models may be used for demonstration, optimization, construction, simulation and other activities in the application domain [
<xref rid="ref19" ref-type="bibr">19</xref>
]. In the field of information science, recent examples in the literature can be found that discuss specific conceptual models in detail [
<xref rid="ref20" ref-type="bibr">20</xref>
-
<xref rid="ref22" ref-type="bibr">22</xref>
]. The complexity of health is a major reason why health informatics is not just another application domain in information science [
<xref rid="ref23" ref-type="bibr">23</xref>
]. In the health sciences, an introduction to a range of conceptual models for defining and conceptualizing health argues that simplistic definitions of health lead to equally simplistic measures of health, health outcomes, and quality of care [
<xref rid="ref24" ref-type="bibr">24</xref>
]. In the field of health, recent examples which explore conceptual models can be found [
<xref rid="ref25" ref-type="bibr">25</xref>
-
<xref rid="ref28" ref-type="bibr">28</xref>
].</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Review Conceptual Models Already Used in Health Informatics</title>
<p>The next step is to review the health informatics literature for conceptual models that can be either applied or adapted to the research question. A clearly described search strategy for reviewing this literature is an indicator of the rigor you need to apply to the process of conceptualizing the problem [
<xref rid="ref29" ref-type="bibr">29</xref>
,
<xref rid="ref30" ref-type="bibr">30</xref>
]. The starting point is to compare various overarching conceptual models based on the power each may have to fully account for all the elements of the problem as you have chosen to define it. The introduction section of this paper offered examples from the 1997-2008 decade, and more recent examples can be found in references [
<xref rid="ref9" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>
,
<xref rid="ref31" ref-type="bibr">31</xref>
-
<xref rid="ref34" ref-type="bibr">34</xref>
]. It is essential to justify your choice of a pre-existing conceptual model as it relates to the key features of your research problem. Alternatively, you may conclude that no pre-existing, cross-cutting conceptual models are adequate to explore this problem. This judgment also requires justification, and it opens the way for thought experiments about options for combining and elaborating the particular conceptual models that you have previously acknowledged. In one example, an investigation of a novel and under-researched technology in health care was able to proceed by integrating concepts of evidence-based treatment (from health science) and technology affordances (from information science) into a new conceptual model of therapeutic affordances of social media [
<xref rid="ref35" ref-type="bibr">35</xref>
].</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Schematize the Chosen Conceptual Model of the Research Problem</title>
<p>Making a schematic representation of your chosen conceptual model captures and refines the thought processes behind your choice. A visual artifact in the form of a diagram, motif, map or other type of figure (eg, a foil or straw man) can be used for reacting to and testing the thinking about a problem, to guide collaboration, and to assess research progress and outcomes. An example of schematizing a health informatics conceptual model to represent the relationships among health information technology characteristics is the Health Information Technology Reference-based Evaluation Framework [
<xref rid="ref36" ref-type="bibr">36</xref>
]. A second example illustrates the temporal dimensions of five measures of health information system adoption in the Clinical Adoption Meta Model [
<xref rid="ref37" ref-type="bibr">37</xref>
].</p>
<p>The challenge for every health informatics researcher is to think deeply about an apt way to visualize the specific problem space. Part of the contribution that your research makes to the field is determined by the originality you show in this step. Questions to consider include: How does the visualization of your conceptual model position the information science and the health science elements of the problem (eg, side-by-side versus above and below)? Does the level of detail match the intended level of investigation (eg, evaluating the impact of a policy may need to represent issues at a macro level or assessing software functionality may need a finer grained picture)? Does it leave too much to be inferred (eg, not indicating the direction in which a multi-part image should be "read") or use conventions in an unconventional way (eg, using the colors red for "go" and green for "stop")?</p>
<p>The schema also needs to be interpreted in words that explain it to someone who is unfamiliar with the research problem or who does not have access to the graphic. It should be clear why you have chosen the visual representations you are using to represent the key entities and relationships that your problem involves. For example, a study of unfulfilled and unrecognized or hidden health information needs explained the research framework using the graphic image and written analogy of an iceberg [
<xref rid="ref38" ref-type="bibr">38</xref>
].</p>
<p>Your first attempt to represent the entities and relationships in your research problem using a Venn diagram, matrix, or flowchart may not suffice to give adequate detail or insight into the problem space. The visualization of knowledge is a field of study in its own right, and you may find it helpful to consult general works [
<xref rid="ref39" ref-type="bibr">39</xref>
,
<xref rid="ref40" ref-type="bibr">40</xref>
]. Although the visualization of data has become an active health informatics research area [
<xref rid="ref41" ref-type="bibr">41</xref>
,
<xref rid="ref42" ref-type="bibr">42</xref>
], the visualization of concepts is a very different order of activity.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Seek Critical Feedback on the Conceptual Model From Multiple Perspectives</title>
<p>Your conceptual model may appear completely sensible from your point of view. However, at this point in development, you should be thinking of your conceptual model as a communication tool. This tool should help you engage other people who are direct and indirect stakeholders in your research. Thus, stakeholders with other perspectives need to test its communicative power to assure you that it is making sense of the problem.</p>
<p>A conceptual model in health informatics research should pass the "goodness of fit" test for domain experts in both information science and health science. This is an informal but important step where you seek critique of your conceptual model from others who are at a distance from your research question. Their reactions allow you to refine and strengthen the supporting arguments for your conceptual model as needed. You are looking for toughness; now is the time to establish whether your conceptual model will stand up to scrutiny and be persuasive in a room full of either clinical specialists or computer scientists.</p>
<p>For a researcher in training, often the best way to ensure access to this kind of feedback is to make sure that the supervisory or advisory committee comprises people who bring information science and health science perspectives. Alternatively, the researcher needs to find suitable critical colleagues by tapping into networks of clinicians and researchers within the health and biomedicine community, and into networks of industry experts and researchers within the information science and technology community. Organizational mentoring programs, professional associations, or scientific societies can provide access to networks appropriate to the study.</p>
<p>If the research involves human participants, another method of seeking feedback on a conceptual model is to engage actively with prospective participants including patients and consumers. For example, Belanger et al. advocated involving patients from the inception of a research project centered on electronic health records [
<xref rid="ref43" ref-type="bibr">43</xref>
].</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Allow the Conceptual Model to Influence the Research Design</title>
<p>There must be a close connection between your conceptual model and research design. In a different field of health research, the alignment was expressed as follows:</p>
<disp-quote>
<p>The CF (conceptual framework) provided the basis for decisions about the development of a mixed-method research design and data collection measures. For each construct of interest, we determined the most suitable approach to collecting information. We arranged the constructs into two categories: those where validated quantitative measures were available (...); and second, those that were best suited for exploratory/qualitative methods.</p>
<attrib>
<xref rid="ref18" ref-type="bibr">18</xref>
</attrib>
</disp-quote>
<p>This is a good example of allowing the conceptual model to influence the research design, including the selection of the research procedures and outcome measures (for quantitative research) or themes (for qualitative research). Feasibility factors also influence research design, for example, access to sites for field studies, available funding and human resources, the exigencies of ethics approval, and time constraints. However, if any of these factors undermine the conceptual model to any great extent, then the research question and conceptual model need to be reformulated.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Revisit the Conceptual Model in Light of the Research Findings</title>
<p>Your conceptual model is what guides the approach you take to explore a real-world research problem. The corollary is that through exploring this problem, inevitably you are testing your conceptual model for its usefulness. While you are analyzing and discussing findings from your research project, you need to reflect on whether and how these findings support your initial conceptual model, identify where the conceptual model may need to be modified, and consider broader circumstances where the conceptual model may prove useful. This is an iterative and experiential process that stretches your thinking as your conceptual model "evolves and develops until it becomes refined and burnished, to emerge as a robust outcome of the research" [
<xref rid="ref44" ref-type="bibr">44</xref>
].</p>
<p>In health informatics research, the gap between health sciences and information sciences that must be bridged by this step is substantial.</p>
<disp-quote>
<p>In more mature fields such as medicine, it is standard practice, even mandatory, to conduct empirical research to evaluate the efficacy of proposed new practices prior to advocating their use (...). However in IS design research, it is often sufficient for researchers to argue on logical or theoretical grounds that their approach is effective.</p>
<attrib>
<xref rid="ref45" ref-type="bibr">45</xref>
</attrib>
</disp-quote>
<p>How your health informatics conceptual model is tested depends on the research design appropriate to your study. In one example, thematic analysis of interview data is the basis for revising an initial conceptual model of health professionals’ mobile health use [
<xref rid="ref46" ref-type="bibr">46</xref>
]. Examples where structured survey methods are the basis for revisions to initial conceptual models are found in studies of clinical information system success [
<xref rid="ref47" ref-type="bibr">47</xref>
], and open access publishing use [
<xref rid="ref48" ref-type="bibr">48</xref>
].</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Disseminate the Conceptual Model</title>
<p>The final step is to disseminate your conceptual model through formal presentation and publication in scholarly and scientific conferences and journals. It is important to give over the time and space to include the conceptual model among the publications that come out of your research, so that it is captured and available for others to refer to and build on. You can structure a paper or presentation about your conceptual model using steps one through six in this paper; or examples cited throughout this paper offer many other successful models for publishing a description of your conceptual model.</p>
<p>When you describe your work on a conceptual model you make a contribution to the theory of health informatics, because your conceptual model adds a new theoretical representation of the entities and relationships in a problem space. In disseminating your conceptual model you address an acknowledged need in the field. The absence of theory in health informatics diminishes its status as a field of knowledge [
<xref rid="ref49" ref-type="bibr">49</xref>
]; whereas, enunciating your conceptual model advances the field [
<xref rid="ref3" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>
].</p>
<p>There are many diverse forums where it is possible to disseminate your conceptual model. This is one advantage of the diffusion of published research in health informatics. Apart from those already mentioned in this paper, three further examples of particular health informatics conceptual models published in recent years illustrate that it may be appropriate to place your work in conferences and journals in information science [
<xref rid="ref50" ref-type="bibr">50</xref>
], in health science [
<xref rid="ref51" ref-type="bibr">51</xref>
], and in mainstream health informatics [
<xref rid="ref52" ref-type="bibr">52</xref>
].</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec>
<title>Benefits of Developing and Using Conceptual Models</title>
<p>This paper outlines current challenges in developing a conceptual model that integrates the information science aspects and the health science aspects of a health sector information and communication technology problem. The effort to overcome these challenges can yield important benefits that are not only theoretical but also practical. For the individual researcher, the conceptual model provides a persistent reminder of the defined entities and relationships that give shape and direction to their research plan and the interpretation of their findings. For teams comprising various disciplines in a collaborative research project, the conceptual model helps to share the related vocabulary and reach agreement on the underlying constructs. For diverse researchers with different questions who are formulating their own approach or discussing their own findings, the conceptual model facilitates comparisons and cross-pollination of ideas. Beyond the research community, there are benefits from giving closer attention to health informatics conceptual models for three professional practice communities : health informatics practitioners, other health practitioners, and other IT practitioners.</p>
<p>The community of health informatics professionals can use conceptual models more overtly to improve practice. By eliciting organizational input into conceptualizing implementation issues [
<xref rid="ref13" ref-type="bibr">13</xref>
], they may be able to communicate and surmount notable problems of sustaining health information and communication technology applications [
<xref rid="ref30" ref-type="bibr">30</xref>
]. For instance, making deliberate use of a socio-technical conceptual model can help to anticipate unintended consequences before these emerge during system implementation [
<xref rid="ref53" ref-type="bibr">53</xref>
]. Building health informatics conceptual modeling skills can enhance training and professional development for roles such as chief information officers in health organizations, research and development managers in health technology companies, and health informatics experts in large consulting firms. For example, health informaticians in such roles may benefit from working with conceptual models to explain and deliver the business value of information technology in healthcare [
<xref rid="ref54" ref-type="bibr">54</xref>
].</p>
<p>Health professionals who are not information scientists can use conceptual models to facilitate inter-professional practice, exert collegial influence, and advance professional ethics in their work in an increasingly technological sector. For the individual health professional, making explicit the conceptual models you use in your professional practice enables you to integrate these more strongly into planning for new work practices during periods of technology change and adoption [
<xref rid="ref55" ref-type="bibr">55</xref>
]. In working with colleagues in your profession, your ability to communicate conceptual models that frame health information and communication technology projects can position you as a leader and facilitator in the design and oversight of such projects [
<xref rid="ref36" ref-type="bibr">36</xref>
]. In addition, the way each health profession expresses its ethical commitment to the safety and quality of care can be subtly different. When you clarify the conceptual models that you apply in health information technology projects that involve your own patients and/or clients in the settings where you provide care for them [
<xref rid="ref56" ref-type="bibr">56</xref>
], you express more deeply the way you think about their needs and how technology interventions might address these. In doing so, you contribute to broadening the discourse within your profession about the ethical practice of clinical informatics.</p>
<p>Information professionals who are not health scientists can use integrative conceptual models to access important opportunities for innovation in the health sector, to achieve advances on health informatics grand challenges, and to build prized expertise and strong partnerships. Because information technology in health is developing massively and is being adopted rapidly, the health sector offers numerous opportunities to apply emerging solutions. When you aim to transfer into the health sector the conceptual models that underlie solutions from non-health sectors, acknowledging and articulating these enables you to reflect on how they can be expected to have positive impacts and be sustainable in health [
<xref rid="ref57" ref-type="bibr">57</xref>
]. Coming to terms with the way information science conceptual models relate to the key health domain conceptual models where you are applying solutions can make you more effective in solving higher order problems [
<xref rid="ref58" ref-type="bibr">58</xref>
]. If you are able to relate to and communicate within the health sector on this conceptual level [
<xref rid="ref59" ref-type="bibr">59</xref>
,
<xref rid="ref60" ref-type="bibr">60</xref>
], you will have expertise that is critical for successful collaboration with highly educated and committed health professionals to bring about technological transformation.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>Our aim is to provide a representative selection of examples to accompany our suggestions for researchers who are new to the health informatics discipline. It is important for health informatics researchers to elucidate their hard-won conceptual modeling experience, even while recognizing that no conceptual model can ever be static or definitive. Sharing and comparing these foundations of knowledge can support good practice in research training (and in the commissioning, management, and review of research), and thereby can contribute to the evolution of better-formed and more strongly grounded health informatics research. Making explicit the defined entities and relationships in a health informatics research project facilitates deep engagement with cross-cutting problems, offers a way for researchers to be more effective, and enables research to have greater impact.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack>
<p>Ms Cecily Gilbert, Health and Biomedical Informatics Centre, University of Melbourne, did the initial literature review for this paper. JMIR reviewers’ feedback helped us greatly to sharpen the focus of this paper (reviewer names are acknowledged at the end of this paper).</p>
</ack>
<fn-group>
<fn fn-type="con">
<p>Authors' Contributions: KG conceived of the idea for the paper. KG and PS equally contributed to the structure and content of the paper and analyzed and added to the literature identified in the initial review. KG prepared the manuscript for submission and prepared responses to reviewers. PS approved the final version for submission.</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="conflict">
<p>Conflicts of Interest: None declared.</p>
</fn>
</fn-group>
<ref-list>
<ref id="ref1">
<label>1</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kulikowski</surname>
<given-names>CA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shortliffe</surname>
<given-names>EH</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Currie</surname>
<given-names>LM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Elkin</surname>
<given-names>PL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hunter</surname>
<given-names>LE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Johnson</surname>
<given-names>TR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kalet</surname>
<given-names>IJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lenert</surname>
<given-names>LA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Musen</surname>
<given-names>MA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ozbolt</surname>
<given-names>JG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname>
<given-names>JW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tarczy-Hornoch</surname>
<given-names>PZ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Williamson</surname>
<given-names>JJ</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>AMIA Board white paper: definition of biomedical informatics and specification of core competencies for graduate education in the discipline</article-title>
<source>J Am Med Inform Assoc</source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>19</volume>
<issue>6</issue>
<fpage>931</fpage>
<lpage>8</lpage>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://jamia.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=22683918"></ext-link>
</comment>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001053</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="medline">22683918</pub-id>
<pmc-comment>amiajnl-2012-001053</pmc-comment>
<pmc-comment>PMC3534470</pmc-comment>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22683918</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref2">
<label>2</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Friedman</surname>
<given-names>CP</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>What informatics is and isn't</article-title>
<source>J Am Med Inform Assoc</source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>20</volume>
<issue>2</issue>
<fpage>224</fpage>
<lpage>6</lpage>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://jamia.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=23059730"></ext-link>
</comment>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001206</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="medline">23059730</pub-id>
<pmc-comment>amiajnl-2012-001206</pmc-comment>
<pmc-comment>PMC3638194</pmc-comment>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23059730</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref3">
<label>3</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Currie</surname>
<given-names>LM</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Evaluation frameworks for nursing informatics</article-title>
<source>Int J Med Inform</source>
<year>2005</year>
<month>12</month>
<volume>74</volume>
<issue>11-12</issue>
<fpage>908</fpage>
<lpage>16</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.07.007</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="medline">16099711</pub-id>
<pmc-comment>S1386-5056(05)00117-6</pmc-comment>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16099711</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref4">
<label>4</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>MW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tsang</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cheow</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ho</surname>
<given-names>CS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yeong</surname>
<given-names>NB</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ho</surname>
<given-names>RC</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Enabling psychiatrists to be mobile phone app developers: insights into app development methodologies</article-title>
<source>JMIR Mhealth Uhealth</source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>2</volume>
<issue>4</issue>
<fpage>e53</fpage>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://mhealth.jmir.org/2014/4/e53/"></ext-link>
</comment>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2196/mhealth.3425</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="medline">25486985</pub-id>
<pmc-comment>v2i4e53</pmc-comment>
<pmc-comment>PMC4285745</pmc-comment>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25486985</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref5">
<label>5</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Green</surname>
<given-names>HE</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Use of theoretical and conceptual frameworks in qualitative research</article-title>
<source>Nurse Res</source>
<year>2014</year>
<month>7</month>
<volume>21</volume>
<issue>6</issue>
<fpage>34</fpage>
<lpage>8</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7748/nr.21.6.34.e1252</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="medline">25059086</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25059086</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref6">
<label>6</label>
<element-citation publication-type="confproc">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>de Vries</surname>
<given-names>JJG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Geleijnse</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tesanovic</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van de Ven</surname>
<given-names>ART</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Heart failure risk models and their readiness for clinical practice</article-title>
<year>2013</year>
<conf-name>IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI )</conf-name>
<conf-date>9-11 September 2013</conf-date>
<conf-loc>Philadelphia, PA</conf-loc>
<fpage>239</fpage>
<lpage>47</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/ICHI.2013.26</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref7">
<label>7</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname>
<given-names>CA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leong</surname>
<given-names>TY</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Poh</surname>
<given-names>KL</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>PGMC: a framework for probabilistic graphic model combination</article-title>
<source>AMIA Annu Symp Proc</source>
<year>2005</year>
<fpage>370</fpage>
<lpage>4</lpage>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/16779064"></ext-link>
</comment>
<pub-id pub-id-type="medline">16779064</pub-id>
<pmc-comment>58912</pmc-comment>
<pmc-comment>PMC1560518</pmc-comment>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16779064</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref8">
<label>8</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Michel</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Marcy</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shiffman</surname>
<given-names>RN</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>A wireless, handheld decision support system to promote smoking cessation in primary care</article-title>
<source>AMIA Annu Symp Proc</source>
<year>2005</year>
<fpage>530</fpage>
<lpage>4</lpage>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/16779096"></ext-link>
</comment>
<pub-id pub-id-type="medline">16779096</pub-id>
<pmc-comment>58459</pmc-comment>
<pmc-comment>PMC1560449</pmc-comment>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16779096</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref9">
<label>9</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>van Gemert-Pijnen</surname>
<given-names>JE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nijland</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van</surname>
<given-names>LM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ossebaard</surname>
<given-names>HC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kelders</surname>
<given-names>SM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eysenbach</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Seydel</surname>
<given-names>ER</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>A holistic framework to improve the uptake and impact of eHealth technologies</article-title>
<source>J Med Internet Res</source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>13</volume>
<issue>4</issue>
<fpage>e111</fpage>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.jmir.org/2011/4/e111/"></ext-link>
</comment>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2196/jmir.1672</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="medline">22155738</pub-id>
<pmc-comment>v13i4e111</pmc-comment>
<pmc-comment>PMC3278097</pmc-comment>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22155738</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref10">
<label>10</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bossen</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jensen</surname>
<given-names>LG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Udsen</surname>
<given-names>FW</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Evaluation of a comprehensive EHR based on the DeLone and McLean model for IS success: approach, results, and success factors</article-title>
<source>Int J Med Inform</source>
<year>2013</year>
<month>10</month>
<volume>82</volume>
<issue>10</issue>
<fpage>940</fpage>
<lpage>53</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.05.010</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="medline">23827768</pub-id>
<pmc-comment>S1386-5056(13)00128-7</pmc-comment>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23827768</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref11">
<label>11</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yusof</surname>
<given-names>MM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuljis</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Papazafeiropoulou</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stergioulas</surname>
<given-names>LK</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>An evaluation framework for Health Information Systems: human, organization and technology-fit factors (HOT-fit)</article-title>
<source>Int J Med Inform</source>
<year>2008</year>
<month>6</month>
<volume>77</volume>
<issue>6</issue>
<fpage>386</fpage>
<lpage>98</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.08.011</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="medline">17964851</pub-id>
<pmc-comment>S1386-5056(07)00160-8</pmc-comment>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17964851</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref12">
<label>12</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gordon</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Herbert</surname>
<given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Johnson</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nicklin</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pitty</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reeves</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Telematics for clinical guidelines: a conceptual modelling approach</article-title>
<source>Stud Health Technol Inform</source>
<year>1997</year>
<volume>43 Pt A</volume>
<fpage>314</fpage>
<lpage>8</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="medline">10179562</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10179562</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref13">
<label>13</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ruland</surname>
<given-names>CM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bakken</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Developing, implementing, and evaluating decision support systems for shared decision making in patient care: a conceptual model and case illustration</article-title>
<source>J Biomed Inform</source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>35</volume>
<issue>5-6</issue>
<fpage>313</fpage>
<lpage>21</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="medline">12968780</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12968780</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref14">
<label>14</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kaplan</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shaw</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Future directions in evaluation research: people, organizational, and social issues</article-title>
<source>Methods Inf Med</source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>43</volume>
<issue>3</issue>
<fpage>215</fpage>
<lpage>31</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1267/METH04030215</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="medline">15227551</pub-id>
<pmc-comment>04030215</pmc-comment>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15227551</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref15">
<label>15</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yusof</surname>
<given-names>MM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Papazafeiropoulou</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Paul</surname>
<given-names>RJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stergioulas</surname>
<given-names>LK</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Investigating evaluation frameworks for health information systems</article-title>
<source>Int J Med Inform</source>
<year>2008</year>
<month>6</month>
<volume>77</volume>
<issue>6</issue>
<fpage>377</fpage>
<lpage>85</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.08.004</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="medline">17904898</pub-id>
<pmc-comment>S1386-5056(07)00159-1</pmc-comment>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17904898</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref16">
<label>16</label>
<element-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fook</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>White</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gardner</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>White</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fook</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gardner</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Critical reflection: a review of contemporary literature and understandings</article-title>
<source>Critical Reflection in Health and Social Care</source>
<year>2006</year>
<publisher-loc>Maidenhead, Berkshire, England</publisher-loc>
<publisher-name>Open University Press</publisher-name>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref17">
<label>17</label>
<element-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shields</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rangarajan</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source>A Playbook for Research Methods: Integrating Conceptual Frameworks and Project Management</source>
<year>2013</year>
<publisher-loc>Stillwater, OK</publisher-loc>
<publisher-name>New Forums Press</publisher-name>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref18">
<label>18</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Helitzer</surname>
<given-names>DL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sussman</surname>
<given-names>AL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hoffman</surname>
<given-names>RM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Getrich</surname>
<given-names>CM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Warner</surname>
<given-names>TD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rhyne</surname>
<given-names>RL</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Along the way to developing a theory of the program: a re-examination of the conceptual framework as an organizing strategy</article-title>
<source>Eval Program Plann</source>
<year>2014</year>
<month>8</month>
<volume>45</volume>
<fpage>157</fpage>
<lpage>63</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.04.005</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="medline">24836998</pub-id>
<pmc-comment>S0149-7189(14)00044-5</pmc-comment>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24836998</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref19">
<label>19</label>
<element-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Thalheim</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Embley</surname>
<given-names>DW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thalheim</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>The theory of conceptual models, the theory of conceptual modelling and foundations of conceptual modelling</article-title>
<source>Handbook of Conceptual Modeling: Theory, Practice, and Research Challenges</source>
<year>2011</year>
<publisher-loc>Berlin</publisher-loc>
<publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>
<fpage>547</fpage>
<lpage>80</lpage>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref20">
<label>20</label>
<element-citation publication-type="confproc">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Poelmans</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dedene</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Snoeck</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Viaene</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Using formal concept analysis for the verification of process - data matrices in conceptual domain models</article-title>
<source>Proceedings of IASTED International Conference on Software Engineering</source>
<year>2010</year>
<conf-name>IASTED International Conference on Software Engineering</conf-name>
<conf-date>16-18 February 2010</conf-date>
<conf-loc>Innsbruck, Austria</conf-loc>
<publisher-loc>Calgary, Canada</publisher-loc>
<publisher-name>Acta Press</publisher-name>
<fpage>79</fpage>
<lpage>86</lpage>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref21">
<label>21</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tamzalit</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schätz</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pierantonio</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deridder</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Introduction to the SoSyM theme issue on models and evolution</article-title>
<source>Softw Syst Model</source>
<year>2013</year>
<month>4</month>
<day>14</day>
<volume>13</volume>
<issue>2</issue>
<fpage>621</fpage>
<lpage>623</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10270-013-0338-4</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref22">
<label>22</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Thomas</surname>
<given-names>O</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>vom Brocke</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>A value-driven approach to the design of service-oriented information systems—making use of conceptual models</article-title>
<source>Inf Syst E-Bus Manage</source>
<year>2009</year>
<month>2</month>
<day>27</day>
<volume>8</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<fpage>67</fpage>
<lpage>97</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10257-009-0110-z</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref23">
<label>23</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Complex interventions in healthcare and health informatics: a scoping review</article-title>
<source>Stud Health Technol Inform</source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>183</volume>
<fpage>263</fpage>
<lpage>8</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3233/978-1-61499-203-5-263</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23388295</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref24">
<label>24</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Larson</surname>
<given-names>JS</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>The conceptualization of health</article-title>
<source>Med Care Res Rev</source>
<year>1999</year>
<month>6</month>
<volume>56</volume>
<issue>2</issue>
<fpage>123</fpage>
<lpage>36</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="medline">10373720</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10373720</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref25">
<label>25</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Aluttis</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>den Broucke</surname>
<given-names>SV</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chiotan</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Costongs</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Michelsen</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brand</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Public health and health promotion capacity at national and regional level: a review of conceptual frameworks</article-title>
<source>J Public Health Res</source>
<year>2014</year>
<month>3</month>
<day>26</day>
<volume>3</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<fpage>199</fpage>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/25170508"></ext-link>
</comment>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4081/jphr.2014.199</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="medline">25170508</pub-id>
<pmc-comment>PMC4140385</pmc-comment>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25170508</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref26">
<label>26</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Banzi</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moja</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pistotti</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Facchini</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liberati</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Conceptual frameworks and empirical approaches used to assess the impact of health research: an overview of reviews</article-title>
<source>Health Res Policy Syst</source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>9</volume>
<fpage>26</fpage>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://health-policy-systems.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1478-4505-9-26"></ext-link>
</comment>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1478-4505-9-26</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="medline">21702930</pub-id>
<pmc-comment>1478-4505-9-26</pmc-comment>
<pmc-comment>PMC3141787</pmc-comment>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21702930</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref27">
<label>27</label>
<element-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Courtney</surname>
<given-names>LG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Caltabiano</surname>
<given-names>NJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Caltabiano</surname>
<given-names>ML</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Caltabiano</surname>
<given-names>ML</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ricciardelli</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Developing conceptual models of psychosocial wellbeing: pursuing better health outcomes</article-title>
<source>Applied topics in health psychology</source>
<year>2013</year>
<publisher-loc>Somerset, NJ</publisher-loc>
<publisher-name>Wiley</publisher-name>
<fpage>112</fpage>
<lpage>33</lpage>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref28">
<label>28</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Marmor</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wendt</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Conceptual frameworks for comparing healthcare politics and policy</article-title>
<source>Health Policy</source>
<year>2012</year>
<month>9</month>
<volume>107</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<fpage>11</fpage>
<lpage>20</lpage>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0168-8510(12)00161-3"></ext-link>
</comment>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.06.003</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="medline">22763200</pub-id>
<pmc-comment>S0168-8510(12)00161-3</pmc-comment>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22763200</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref29">
<label>29</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kruse</surname>
<given-names>CS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>DeShazo</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fulton</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Factors associated with adoption of health information technology: a conceptual model based on a systematic review</article-title>
<source>JMIR Med Inform</source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>2</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<fpage>e9</fpage>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://medinform.jmir.org/2014/1/e9/"></ext-link>
</comment>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2196/medinform.3106</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="medline">25599673</pub-id>
<pmc-comment>v2i1e9</pmc-comment>
<pmc-comment>PMC4288077</pmc-comment>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25599673</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref30">
<label>30</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cresswell</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sheikh</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Organizational issues in the implementation and adoption of health information technology innovations: an interpretative review</article-title>
<source>Int J Med Inform</source>
<year>2013</year>
<month>5</month>
<volume>82</volume>
<issue>5</issue>
<fpage>e73</fpage>
<lpage>86</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.10.007</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="medline">23146626</pub-id>
<pmc-comment>S1386-5056(12)00199-2</pmc-comment>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23146626</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref31">
<label>31</label>
<element-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>De Marco</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ricciardi</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vom Brocke</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Wickramasinghe</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bali</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Suomi</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Strategies and solutions in eHealth: a literature review</article-title>
<source>Critical Issues for the Development of Sustainable e-Health Solutions. Healthcare Delivery in the Information Age</source>
<year>2012</year>
<publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>
<publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>
<fpage>135</fpage>
<lpage>47</lpage>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref32">
<label>32</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mohr</surname>
<given-names>DC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schueller</surname>
<given-names>SM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Montague</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Burns</surname>
<given-names>MN</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rashidi</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>The behavioral intervention technology model: an integrated conceptual and technological framework for eHealth and mHealth interventions</article-title>
<source>J Med Internet Res</source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>16</volume>
<issue>6</issue>
<fpage>e146</fpage>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.jmir.org/2014/6/e146/"></ext-link>
</comment>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2196/jmir.3077</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="medline">24905070</pub-id>
<pmc-comment>v16i6e146</pmc-comment>
<pmc-comment>PMC4071229</pmc-comment>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24905070</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref33">
<label>33</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Morrison</surname>
<given-names>LG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yardley</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Powell</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Michie</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>What design features are used in effective e-health interventions? A review using techniques from Critical Interpretive Synthesis</article-title>
<source>Telemed J E Health</source>
<year>2012</year>
<month>3</month>
<volume>18</volume>
<issue>2</issue>
<fpage>137</fpage>
<lpage>44</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/tmj.2011.0062</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="medline">22381060</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22381060</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref34">
<label>34</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rippen</surname>
<given-names>HE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pan</surname>
<given-names>EC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Russell</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Byrne</surname>
<given-names>CM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Swift</surname>
<given-names>EK</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Organizational framework for health information technology</article-title>
<source>Int J Med Inform</source>
<year>2013</year>
<month>4</month>
<volume>82</volume>
<issue>4</issue>
<fpage>e1</fpage>
<lpage>13</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.01.012</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="medline">22377094</pub-id>
<pmc-comment>S1386-5056(12)00031-7</pmc-comment>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22377094</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref35">
<label>35</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Merolli</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gray</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Martin-Sanchez</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Developing a framework to generate evidence of health outcomes from social media use in chronic disease management</article-title>
<source>Med 2.0</source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>2</volume>
<issue>2</issue>
<fpage>e3</fpage>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.medicine20.com/2013/2/e3/"></ext-link>
</comment>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2196/med20.2717</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="medline">25075238</pub-id>
<pmc-comment>v2i2e3</pmc-comment>
<pmc-comment>PMC4085121</pmc-comment>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25075238</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref36">
<label>36</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sockolow</surname>
<given-names>PS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Crawford</surname>
<given-names>PR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lehmann</surname>
<given-names>HP</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Health services research evaluation principles</article-title>
<source>Methods Inf Med</source>
<year>2012</year>
<month>2</month>
<day>07</day>
<volume>51</volume>
<issue>2</issue>
<fpage>122</fpage>
<lpage>130</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3414/me10-01-0066</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22311125</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref37">
<label>37</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Price</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lau</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>The clinical adoption meta-model: a temporal meta-model describing the clinical adoption of health information systems</article-title>
<source>BMC Med Inform Decis Mak</source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>14</volume>
<fpage>43</fpage>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://bmcmedinformdecismak.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1472-6947-14-43"></ext-link>
</comment>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1472-6947-14-43</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="medline">24884588</pub-id>
<pmc-comment>1472-6947-14-43</pmc-comment>
<pmc-comment>PMC4050391</pmc-comment>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24884588</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref38">
<label>38</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Alzougool</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chang</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gray</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Towards a comprehensive understanding of health information needs</article-title>
<source>Electronic Journal of Health Informatics</source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>3</volume>
<issue>2</issue>
<fpage>e15</fpage>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.ejhi.net/ojs/index.php/ejhi/article/view/57/44"></ext-link>
</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref39">
<label>39</label>
<element-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Eppler</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Marchese</surname>
<given-names>FT</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Banissi</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>What is an effective knowledge visualization? Insights from a review of seminal concepts</article-title>
<source>Knowledge Visualization Currents: From Text to Art to Culture</source>
<year>2013</year>
<publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>
<publisher-name>Springer-Verlag</publisher-name>
<fpage>3</fpage>
<lpage>12</lpage>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref40">
<label>40</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Snyder</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Visual representation of information as communicative practice</article-title>
<source>J Assn Inf Sci Tec</source>
<year>2014</year>
<month>4</month>
<day>21</day>
<volume>65</volume>
<issue>11</issue>
<fpage>2233</fpage>
<lpage>2247</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/asi.23103</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref41">
<label>41</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>West</surname>
<given-names>VL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Borland</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hammond</surname>
<given-names>WE</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Innovative information visualization of electronic health record data: a systematic review</article-title>
<source>J Am Med Inform Assoc</source>
<year>2015</year>
<month>3</month>
<volume>22</volume>
<issue>2</issue>
<fpage>330</fpage>
<lpage>9</lpage>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://jamia.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=25336597"></ext-link>
</comment>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002955</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="medline">25336597</pub-id>
<pmc-comment>amiajnl-2014-002955</pmc-comment>
<pmc-comment>PMC4394966</pmc-comment>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25336597</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref42">
<label>42</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Z</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ahmed</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ramakrishnan</surname>
<given-names>IV</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Viccellio</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mueller</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>The five Ws for information visualization with application to healthcare informatics</article-title>
<source>IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph</source>
<year>2013</year>
<month>11</month>
<volume>19</volume>
<issue>11</issue>
<fpage>1895</fpage>
<lpage>910</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/TVCG.2013.89</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="medline">24029909</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24029909</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref43">
<label>43</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bélanger</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bartlett</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dawes</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rodríguez</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hasson-Gidoni</surname>
<given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Examining the evidence of the impact of health information technology in primary care: an argument for participatory research with health professionals and patients</article-title>
<source>Int J Med Inform</source>
<year>2012</year>
<month>10</month>
<volume>81</volume>
<issue>10</issue>
<fpage>654</fpage>
<lpage>61</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.07.008</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="medline">22910233</pub-id>
<pmc-comment>S1386-5056(12)00135-9</pmc-comment>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22910233</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref44">
<label>44</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sinclair</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>A guide to understanding theoretical and conceptual frameworks</article-title>
<source>Evidence Based Midwifery</source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>5</volume>
<issue>2</issue>
<fpage>39</fpage>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref45">
<label>45</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Moody</surname>
<given-names>DL</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Theoretical and practical issues in evaluating the quality of conceptual models: current state and future directions</article-title>
<source>Data & Knowledge Engineering</source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>55</volume>
<issue>3</issue>
<fpage>243</fpage>
<lpage>76</lpage>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref46">
<label>46</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>O'Connor</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>O'Reilly</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>O'Donoghue</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>M-health infusion by healthcare practitioners in the national health services (NHS)</article-title>
<source>Health Policy and Technology</source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>2</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<fpage>26</fpage>
<lpage>35</lpage>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref47">
<label>47</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Garcia-Smith</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Effken</surname>
<given-names>JA</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Development and initial evaluation of the Clinical Information Systems Success Model (CISSM)</article-title>
<source>Int J Med Inform</source>
<year>2013</year>
<month>6</month>
<volume>82</volume>
<issue>6</issue>
<fpage>539</fpage>
<lpage>52</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.01.011</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="medline">23497819</pub-id>
<pmc-comment>S1386-5056(13)00022-1</pmc-comment>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23497819</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref48">
<label>48</label>
<element-citation publication-type="confproc">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lwoga</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Questier</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>A model for measuring open access adoption and usage behavior of health sciences faculty members</article-title>
<source>Proceedings of 13th Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing</source>
<year>2014</year>
<conf-name>13th Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing</conf-name>
<conf-date>25-28 September 2013</conf-date>
<conf-loc>Seville, Spain</conf-loc>
<publisher-loc>Cham, Switzerland</publisher-loc>
<publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>
<fpage>1298</fpage>
<lpage>301</lpage>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref49">
<label>49</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Scott</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Briggs</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wyatt</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Georgiou</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>How important is theory in health informatics? A survey of UK academics</article-title>
<source>Stud Health Technol Inform</source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>169</volume>
<fpage>223</fpage>
<lpage>7</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="medline">21893746</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21893746</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref50">
<label>50</label>
<element-citation publication-type="confproc">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Heath</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Appen</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Impact of information technology culture conflict on meaningful use of electronic health records system: A conceptual framework</article-title>
<source>aisel.aisnet.org</source>
<year>2014</year>
<conf-name>Twentieth Americas Conference on Information Systems</conf-name>
<conf-date>7-9 August 2014</conf-date>
<conf-loc>Savannah, GA, USA</conf-loc>
<publisher-loc>Atlanta, GA, USA</publisher-loc>
<publisher-name>Association for Information Systems</publisher-name>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref51">
<label>51</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Paez</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Roper</surname>
<given-names>RA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Andrews</surname>
<given-names>RM</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Health information technology and hospital patient safety: a conceptual model to guide research</article-title>
<source>Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf</source>
<year>2013</year>
<month>9</month>
<volume>39</volume>
<issue>9</issue>
<fpage>415</fpage>
<lpage>25</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="medline">24147353</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24147353</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref52">
<label>52</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Messeri</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khan</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Millery</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Campbell</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Merrill</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shih</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kukafka</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>An information systems model of the determinants of electronic health record use</article-title>
<source>Appl Clin Inform</source>
<year>2013</year>
<month>4</month>
<day>17</day>
<volume>4</volume>
<issue>2</issue>
<fpage>185</fpage>
<lpage>200</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4338/aci-2013-01-ra-0005</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23874357</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref53">
<label>53</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Harrison</surname>
<given-names>MI</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Koppel</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bar-Lev</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Unintended consequences of information technologies in health care--an interactive sociotechnical analysis</article-title>
<source>J Am Med Inform Assoc</source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>14</volume>
<issue>5</issue>
<fpage>542</fpage>
<lpage>9</lpage>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://jamia.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=17600093"></ext-link>
</comment>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1197/jamia.M2384</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="medline">17600093</pub-id>
<pmc-comment>M2384</pmc-comment>
<pmc-comment>PMC1975796</pmc-comment>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17600093</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref54">
<label>54</label>
<element-citation publication-type="confproc">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Haddad</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wickramasinghe</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Conceptualizing business value of IT in healthcare to design sustainable e-Health solutions</article-title>
<year>2014</year>
<conf-name>Twentieth Americas Conference on Information Systems</conf-name>
<conf-date>7-9 August 2014</conf-date>
<conf-loc>Savannah, GA</conf-loc>
<publisher-loc>Atlanta, GA, USA</publisher-loc>
<publisher-name>Association for Information Systems</publisher-name>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref55">
<label>55</label>
<element-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Olla</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Butrico</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pichette</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Adibi</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Role of mHealth in nursing: a conceptual framework</article-title>
<source>mHealth Multidisciplinary Verticals</source>
<year>2015</year>
<publisher-loc>Boca Raton, FL</publisher-loc>
<publisher-name>CRC Press</publisher-name>
<fpage>279</fpage>
<lpage>98</lpage>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref56">
<label>56</label>
<element-citation publication-type="confproc">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mburu</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Franz</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Springer</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>A conceptual framework for designing mHealth solutions for developing countries</article-title>
<source>Proceedings of the 3rd ACM MobiHoc Workshop on Pervasive Wireless Healthcare</source>
<year>2013</year>
<conf-name>3rd ACM MobiHoc Workshop on Pervasive Wireless Healthcare</conf-name>
<conf-date>29 July - 1 August 2013</conf-date>
<conf-loc>Bangalore, India</conf-loc>
<publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>
<publisher-name>ACM</publisher-name>
<fpage>31</fpage>
<lpage>6</lpage>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref57">
<label>57</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Williams</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maeder</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>A conceptual framework for secure mobile health</article-title>
<source>Journal of the International Society for Telemedicine and eHealth</source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<fpage>44</fpage>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref58">
<label>58</label>
<element-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ritz</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Marconi</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lehmann</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Measuring e-health impact: an e-health evaluation framework that leverages process control theory and big data analytics</article-title>
<source>Big Data and Health Analytics</source>
<year>2014</year>
<publisher-loc>Hoboken, NJ</publisher-loc>
<publisher-name>Auerbach Publications</publisher-name>
<fpage>309</fpage>
<lpage>32</lpage>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref59">
<label>59</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Unertl</surname>
<given-names>KM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Novak</surname>
<given-names>LL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Johnson</surname>
<given-names>KB</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lorenzi</surname>
<given-names>NM</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Traversing the many paths of workflow research: developing a conceptual framework of workflow terminology through a systematic literature review</article-title>
<source>J Am Med Inform Assoc</source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>17</volume>
<issue>3</issue>
<fpage>265</fpage>
<lpage>73</lpage>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://jamia.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=20442143"></ext-link>
</comment>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1136/jamia.2010.004333</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="medline">20442143</pub-id>
<pmc-comment>17/3/265</pmc-comment>
<pmc-comment>PMC2995718</pmc-comment>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20442143</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref60">
<label>60</label>
<element-citation publication-type="confproc">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sanderson</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiao</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Freeman</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Broxham</surname>
<given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Envisioning healthcare work: models for prospective evaluation of new systems</article-title>
<source>Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGHIT International Health Informatics Symposium</source>
<year>2012</year>
<conf-name>2nd ACM SIGHIT International Health Informatics Symposium</conf-name>
<conf-date>28-30 January 2012</conf-date>
<conf-loc>Miami, Florida, USA</conf-loc>
<publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>
<publisher-name>ACM</publisher-name>
<fpage>779</fpage>
<lpage>84</lpage>
</element-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</pmc>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/TelematiV1/Data/Pmc/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000069 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000069 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    TelematiV1
   |flux=    Pmc
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     PMC:4785238
   |texte=   Conceptual Models in Health Informatics Research: A Literature Review and Suggestions for Development
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:26912288" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a TelematiV1 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31.
Data generation: Thu Nov 2 16:09:04 2017. Site generation: Sun Mar 10 16:42:28 2024