Using the right tools : Enhancing retrieval from marked-up documents
Identifieur interne :
000062 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus );
précédent :
000061;
suivant :
000063
Using the right tools : Enhancing retrieval from marked-up documents
Auteurs : C. Welty ;
N. IdeSource :
-
Computers and the humanities [ 0010-4817 ] ; 1999.
RBID : Francis:524-99-12230
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
- Intelligence artificielle,
Recherche d'information,
Représentation des connaissances,
Structure sémantique,
Classification,
Concept,
Description,
Texte électronique,
Encodage,
Système Classic,
SGML,
TEI.
English descriptors
Abstract
We are experimenting with the representation of a DTD and associated documents (i.e., documents conformant to the DTD) in a knowledge representation (KR) system, in order to provide more sophisticated query and retrieval from TEI documents than current systems provide. We are using CLASSIC, a frame-based representation system developed at AT&T Bell Laboratories. Like many KR systems, CLASSIC enables the definition of structured concepts/frames, their organization into taxonomies, the creation and manipulation of individual instances of such concepts, and inference such as inheritance, relation transitivity, inverses, etc. In addition, CLASSIC provides for the key inferences of subsumption and classification. By representing a document as an individual instance of a hierarchy of concepts derived from the DTD, and by allowing the creation of additional user-defined concepts and relations, sophisticated query and retrieval operations can be performed. This paper describes CLASSIC and the formalism of description logic that underlies it, and demonstrates how it can be used for enhanced retrieval from richly encoded documents
Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)
Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.
pA |
A01 | 01 | 1 | | @0 0010-4817 |
---|
A02 | 01 | | | @0 COHUAD |
---|
A03 | | 1 | | @0 Comput. humanit. |
---|
A05 | | | | @2 33 |
---|
A06 | | | | @2 1-2 |
---|
A08 | 01 | 1 | ENG | @1 Using the right tools : Enhancing retrieval from marked-up documents |
---|
A09 | 01 | 1 | ENG | @1 Selected papers from TEI 10: Celebrating the tenth anniversary of the Text Encoding Initiative |
---|
A11 | 01 | 1 | | @1 WELTY (C.) |
---|
A11 | 02 | 1 | | @1 IDE (N.) |
---|
A12 | 01 | 1 | | @1 MYLONAS (Elli) @9 ed. |
---|
A12 | 02 | 1 | | @1 RENEAR (Allen) @9 ed. |
---|
A14 | 01 | | | @1 Vassar College, Computer Science Department @2 Poughkeepsie, NY 12604-0462 @3 USA @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut. |
---|
A15 | 01 | | | @1 Scholarly Technology Group, Brown University @2 Providence, RI @3 USA @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut. |
---|
A20 | | | | @1 59-84 |
---|
A21 | | | | @1 1999 |
---|
A23 | 01 | | | @0 ENG |
---|
A43 | 01 | | | @1 INIST @2 14902 @5 354000084333370060 |
---|
A44 | | | | @0 0000 @1 © 1999 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved. |
---|
A45 | | | | @0 16 ref. |
---|
A47 | 01 | 1 | | @0 524-99-12230 |
---|
A60 | | | | @1 P @2 C |
---|
A61 | | | | @0 A |
---|
A64 | 01 | 1 | | @0 Computers and the humanities |
---|
A66 | 01 | | | @0 NLD |
---|
A68 | 01 | 1 | FRE | @1 Utiliser les bons outils : Améliorer la recherche à partir de documents balisés |
---|
A69 | 01 | 1 | FRE | @1 Sélection d'articles célébrant le 10e anniversaire de la TEI |
---|
A99 | | | | @0 1 note |
---|
C01 | 01 | | ENG | @0 We are experimenting with the representation of a DTD and associated documents (i.e., documents conformant to the DTD) in a knowledge representation (KR) system, in order to provide more sophisticated query and retrieval from TEI documents than current systems provide. We are using CLASSIC, a frame-based representation system developed at AT&T Bell Laboratories. Like many KR systems, CLASSIC enables the definition of structured concepts/frames, their organization into taxonomies, the creation and manipulation of individual instances of such concepts, and inference such as inheritance, relation transitivity, inverses, etc. In addition, CLASSIC provides for the key inferences of subsumption and classification. By representing a document as an individual instance of a hierarchy of concepts derived from the DTD, and by allowing the creation of additional user-defined concepts and relations, sophisticated query and retrieval operations can be performed. This paper describes CLASSIC and the formalism of description logic that underlies it, and demonstrates how it can be used for enhanced retrieval from richly encoded documents |
---|
C02 | 01 | L | | @0 52478 @1 XV |
---|
C02 | 02 | L | | @0 524 |
---|
C03 | 01 | L | FRE | @0 Intelligence artificielle @5 01 |
---|
C03 | 01 | L | ENG | @0 Artificial Intelligence @5 01 |
---|
C03 | 02 | L | FRE | @0 Recherche d'information @5 02 |
---|
C03 | 03 | L | FRE | @0 Représentation des connaissances @5 03 |
---|
C03 | 04 | L | FRE | @0 Structure sémantique @5 04 |
---|
C03 | 04 | L | ENG | @0 Semantic structure @5 04 |
---|
C03 | 05 | L | FRE | @0 Classification @5 05 |
---|
C03 | 05 | L | ENG | @0 Classification @5 05 |
---|
C03 | 06 | L | FRE | @0 Concept @5 06 |
---|
C03 | 06 | L | ENG | @0 Concept @5 06 |
---|
C03 | 07 | L | FRE | @0 Description @5 07 |
---|
C03 | 07 | L | ENG | @0 Description @5 07 |
---|
C03 | 08 | L | FRE | @0 Texte électronique @5 08 |
---|
C03 | 08 | L | ENG | @0 Electronic text @5 08 |
---|
C03 | 09 | L | FRE | @0 Encodage @4 INC @5 31 |
---|
C03 | 10 | L | FRE | @0 Système Classic @4 INC @5 32 |
---|
C03 | 11 | L | FRE | @0 SGML @4 INC @5 33 |
---|
C03 | 12 | L | FRE | @0 TEI @4 CD @5 96 |
---|
C03 | 12 | L | ENG | @0 TEI @4 CD @5 96 |
---|
N21 | | | | @1 193 |
---|
|
pR |
A30 | 01 | 1 | ENG | @1 Text Encoding Initiative 10th Anniversary Conference @3 Providence, RI USA @4 1997-11 |
---|
|
Format Inist (serveur)
NO : | FRANCIS 524-99-12230 INIST |
FT : | (Utiliser les bons outils : Améliorer la recherche à partir de documents balisés) |
ET : | Using the right tools : Enhancing retrieval from marked-up documents |
AU : | WELTY (C.); IDE (N.); MYLONAS (Elli); RENEAR (Allen) |
AF : | Vassar College, Computer Science Department/Poughkeepsie, NY 12604-0462/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 2 aut.); Scholarly Technology Group, Brown University/Providence, RI/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 2 aut.) |
DT : | Publication en série; Congrès; Niveau analytique |
SO : | Computers and the humanities; ISSN 0010-4817; Coden COHUAD; Pays-Bas; Da. 1999; Vol. 33; No. 1-2; Pp. 59-84; Bibl. 16 ref. |
LA : | Anglais |
EA : | We are experimenting with the representation of a DTD and associated documents (i.e., documents conformant to the DTD) in a knowledge representation (KR) system, in order to provide more sophisticated query and retrieval from TEI documents than current systems provide. We are using CLASSIC, a frame-based representation system developed at AT&T Bell Laboratories. Like many KR systems, CLASSIC enables the definition of structured concepts/frames, their organization into taxonomies, the creation and manipulation of individual instances of such concepts, and inference such as inheritance, relation transitivity, inverses, etc. In addition, CLASSIC provides for the key inferences of subsumption and classification. By representing a document as an individual instance of a hierarchy of concepts derived from the DTD, and by allowing the creation of additional user-defined concepts and relations, sophisticated query and retrieval operations can be performed. This paper describes CLASSIC and the formalism of description logic that underlies it, and demonstrates how it can be used for enhanced retrieval from richly encoded documents |
CC : | 52478; 524 |
FD : | Intelligence artificielle; Recherche d'information; Représentation des connaissances; Structure sémantique; Classification; Concept; Description; Texte électronique; Encodage; Système Classic; SGML; TEI |
ED : | Artificial Intelligence; Semantic structure; Classification; Concept; Description; Electronic text; TEI |
LO : | INIST-14902.354000084333370060 |
ID : | 524 |
Links to Exploration step
Francis:524-99-12230
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Using the right tools : Enhancing retrieval from marked-up documents</title>
<author><name sortKey="Welty, C" sort="Welty, C" uniqKey="Welty C" first="C." last="Welty">C. Welty</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Vassar College, Computer Science Department</s1>
<s2>Poughkeepsie, NY 12604-0462</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Ide, N" sort="Ide, N" uniqKey="Ide N" first="N." last="Ide">N. Ide</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Vassar College, Computer Science Department</s1>
<s2>Poughkeepsie, NY 12604-0462</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">524-99-12230</idno>
<date when="1999">1999</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">FRANCIS 524-99-12230 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Francis:524-99-12230</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000062</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Using the right tools : Enhancing retrieval from marked-up documents</title>
<author><name sortKey="Welty, C" sort="Welty, C" uniqKey="Welty C" first="C." last="Welty">C. Welty</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Vassar College, Computer Science Department</s1>
<s2>Poughkeepsie, NY 12604-0462</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Ide, N" sort="Ide, N" uniqKey="Ide N" first="N." last="Ide">N. Ide</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Vassar College, Computer Science Department</s1>
<s2>Poughkeepsie, NY 12604-0462</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Computers and the humanities</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Comput. humanit.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0010-4817</idno>
<imprint><date when="1999">1999</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Computers and the humanities</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Comput. humanit.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0010-4817</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Artificial Intelligence</term>
<term>Classification</term>
<term>Concept</term>
<term>Description</term>
<term>Electronic text</term>
<term>Semantic structure</term>
<term>TEI</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Intelligence artificielle</term>
<term>Recherche d'information</term>
<term>Représentation des connaissances</term>
<term>Structure sémantique</term>
<term>Classification</term>
<term>Concept</term>
<term>Description</term>
<term>Texte électronique</term>
<term>Encodage</term>
<term>Système Classic</term>
<term>SGML</term>
<term>TEI</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">We are experimenting with the representation of a DTD and associated documents (i.e., documents conformant to the DTD) in a knowledge representation (KR) system, in order to provide more sophisticated query and retrieval from TEI documents than current systems provide. We are using CLASSIC, a frame-based representation system developed at AT&T Bell Laboratories. Like many KR systems, CLASSIC enables the definition of structured concepts/frames, their organization into taxonomies, the creation and manipulation of individual instances of such concepts, and inference such as inheritance, relation transitivity, inverses, etc. In addition, CLASSIC provides for the key inferences of subsumption and classification. By representing a document as an individual instance of a hierarchy of concepts derived from the DTD, and by allowing the creation of additional user-defined concepts and relations, sophisticated query and retrieval operations can be performed. This paper describes CLASSIC and the formalism of description logic that underlies it, and demonstrates how it can be used for enhanced retrieval from richly encoded documents</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0010-4817</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>COHUAD</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Comput. humanit.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA06><s2>1-2</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Using the right tools : Enhancing retrieval from marked-up documents</s1>
</fA08>
<fA09 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Selected papers from TEI 10: Celebrating the tenth anniversary of the Text Encoding Initiative</s1>
</fA09>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>WELTY (C.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>IDE (N.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA12 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>MYLONAS (Elli)</s1>
<s9>ed.</s9>
</fA12>
<fA12 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>RENEAR (Allen)</s1>
<s9>ed.</s9>
</fA12>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Vassar College, Computer Science Department</s1>
<s2>Poughkeepsie, NY 12604-0462</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA15 i1="01"><s1>Scholarly Technology Group, Brown University</s1>
<s2>Providence, RI</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA15>
<fA20><s1>59-84</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>1999</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>14902</s2>
<s5>354000084333370060</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 1999 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>16 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>524-99-12230</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
<s2>C</s2>
</fA60>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Computers and the humanities</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>NLD</s0>
</fA66>
<fA68 i1="01" i2="1" l="FRE"><s1>Utiliser les bons outils : Améliorer la recherche à partir de documents balisés</s1>
</fA68>
<fA69 i1="01" i2="1" l="FRE"><s1>Sélection d'articles célébrant le 10<sup>e</sup>
anniversaire de la TEI</s1>
</fA69>
<fA99><s0>1 note</s0>
</fA99>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>We are experimenting with the representation of a DTD and associated documents (i.e., documents conformant to the DTD) in a knowledge representation (KR) system, in order to provide more sophisticated query and retrieval from TEI documents than current systems provide. We are using CLASSIC, a frame-based representation system developed at AT&T Bell Laboratories. Like many KR systems, CLASSIC enables the definition of structured concepts/frames, their organization into taxonomies, the creation and manipulation of individual instances of such concepts, and inference such as inheritance, relation transitivity, inverses, etc. In addition, CLASSIC provides for the key inferences of subsumption and classification. By representing a document as an individual instance of a hierarchy of concepts derived from the DTD, and by allowing the creation of additional user-defined concepts and relations, sophisticated query and retrieval operations can be performed. This paper describes CLASSIC and the formalism of description logic that underlies it, and demonstrates how it can be used for enhanced retrieval from richly encoded documents</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="L"><s0>52478</s0>
<s1>XV</s1>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="L"><s0>524</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="L" l="FRE"><s0>Intelligence artificielle</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="L" l="ENG"><s0>Artificial Intelligence</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="L" l="FRE"><s0>Recherche d'information</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="L" l="FRE"><s0>Représentation des connaissances</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="L" l="FRE"><s0>Structure sémantique</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="L" l="ENG"><s0>Semantic structure</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="L" l="FRE"><s0>Classification</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="L" l="ENG"><s0>Classification</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="L" l="FRE"><s0>Concept</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="L" l="ENG"><s0>Concept</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="L" l="FRE"><s0>Description</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="L" l="ENG"><s0>Description</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="L" l="FRE"><s0>Texte électronique</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="L" l="ENG"><s0>Electronic text</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="L" l="FRE"><s0>Encodage</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>31</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="L" l="FRE"><s0>Système Classic</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>32</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="L" l="FRE"><s0>SGML</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>33</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="L" l="FRE"><s0>TEI</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="L" l="ENG"><s0>TEI</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21><s1>193</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
<pR><fA30 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Text Encoding Initiative 10th Anniversary Conference</s1>
<s3>Providence, RI USA</s3>
<s4>1997-11</s4>
</fA30>
</pR>
</standard>
<server><NO>FRANCIS 524-99-12230 INIST</NO>
<FT>(Utiliser les bons outils : Améliorer la recherche à partir de documents balisés)</FT>
<ET>Using the right tools : Enhancing retrieval from marked-up documents</ET>
<AU>WELTY (C.); IDE (N.); MYLONAS (Elli); RENEAR (Allen)</AU>
<AF>Vassar College, Computer Science Department/Poughkeepsie, NY 12604-0462/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 2 aut.); Scholarly Technology Group, Brown University/Providence, RI/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 2 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Congrès; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Computers and the humanities; ISSN 0010-4817; Coden COHUAD; Pays-Bas; Da. 1999; Vol. 33; No. 1-2; Pp. 59-84; Bibl. 16 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>We are experimenting with the representation of a DTD and associated documents (i.e., documents conformant to the DTD) in a knowledge representation (KR) system, in order to provide more sophisticated query and retrieval from TEI documents than current systems provide. We are using CLASSIC, a frame-based representation system developed at AT&T Bell Laboratories. Like many KR systems, CLASSIC enables the definition of structured concepts/frames, their organization into taxonomies, the creation and manipulation of individual instances of such concepts, and inference such as inheritance, relation transitivity, inverses, etc. In addition, CLASSIC provides for the key inferences of subsumption and classification. By representing a document as an individual instance of a hierarchy of concepts derived from the DTD, and by allowing the creation of additional user-defined concepts and relations, sophisticated query and retrieval operations can be performed. This paper describes CLASSIC and the formalism of description logic that underlies it, and demonstrates how it can be used for enhanced retrieval from richly encoded documents</EA>
<CC>52478; 524</CC>
<FD>Intelligence artificielle; Recherche d'information; Représentation des connaissances; Structure sémantique; Classification; Concept; Description; Texte électronique; Encodage; Système Classic; SGML; TEI</FD>
<ED>Artificial Intelligence; Semantic structure; Classification; Concept; Description; Electronic text; TEI</ED>
<LO>INIST-14902.354000084333370060</LO>
<ID>524</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Ticri/explor/TeiVM2/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000062 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000062 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Ticri
|area= TeiVM2
|flux= PascalFrancis
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= Francis:524-99-12230
|texte= Using the right tools : Enhancing retrieval from marked-up documents
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. Data generation: Mon Oct 30 21:59:18 2017. Site generation: Sun Feb 11 23:16:06 2024 | ![](Common/icons/LogoDilib.gif) |