A comparison of the two traditions of metadata development
Identifieur interne : 000363 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000362; suivant : 000364A comparison of the two traditions of metadata development
Auteurs : Kathleen Burnett [États-Unis] ; Kwong Bor Ng [États-Unis] ; Soyeon Park [États-Unis]Source :
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science [ 0002-8231 ] ; 1999.
Abstract
Metadata has taken on a more significant role than ever before in the emerging digital library context because the effective organization of networked information clearly depends on the effective management and organization of metadata. The issue of metadata has been approached variously by different intellectual communities. The two main approaches may be characterized as: (1) the bibliographic control approach (origins and major proponents in library science); and (2) data management approach (origins and major proponents in computer science). This article examines the different conceptual foundations and orientations of the two major approaches contributing to the metadata discussion. An examination of the on‐going efforts to establish metadata standards, and comparison of different metadata formats, supports a proposal for an integrated concept of metadata to facilitate the merging of the two approaches.
Url:
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:13<1209::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-Y
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 000192
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 000192
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 000308
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 000390
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 000363
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A comparison of the two traditions of metadata development</title><author><name sortKey="Burnett, Kathleen" sort="Burnett, Kathleen" uniqKey="Burnett K" first="Kathleen" last="Burnett">Kathleen Burnett</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ng, Kwong Bor" sort="Ng, Kwong Bor" uniqKey="Ng K" first="Kwong Bor" last="Ng">Kwong Bor Ng</name></author><author><name sortKey="Park, Soyeon" sort="Park, Soyeon" uniqKey="Park S" first="Soyeon" last="Park">Soyeon Park</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:C0A0B1A148FE73D00A2085080961025EAB4399F1</idno><date when="1999" year="1999">1999</date><idno type="doi">10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:13<1209::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-Y</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/C0A0B1A148FE73D00A2085080961025EAB4399F1/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000192</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000192</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000308</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000308</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0002-8231:1999:Burnett K:a:comparison:of</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">000390</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000363</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000363</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">A comparison of the two traditions of metadata development</title><author><name sortKey="Burnett, Kathleen" sort="Burnett, Kathleen" uniqKey="Burnett K" first="Kathleen" last="Burnett">Kathleen Burnett</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">Floride</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>Florida State University, School of Information Studies, Tallahassee</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ng, Kwong Bor" sort="Ng, Kwong Bor" uniqKey="Ng K" first="Kwong Bor" last="Ng">Kwong Bor Ng</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">État de New York</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>Queens College, City University of New York, Flushing</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Park, Soyeon" sort="Park, Soyeon" uniqKey="Park S" first="Soyeon" last="Park">Soyeon Park</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">New Jersey</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>Rutgers University, School of Communication, Information and Library Studies, New Brunswick</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Journal of the American Society for Information Science</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci.</title><idno type="ISSN">0002-8231</idno><idno type="eISSN">1097-4571</idno><imprint><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</publisher><pubPlace>New York</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1999">1999</date><biblScope unit="volume">50</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">13</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1209">1209</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1217">1217</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0002-8231</idno></series><idno type="istex">C0A0B1A148FE73D00A2085080961025EAB4399F1</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:13<1209::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-Y</idno><idno type="ArticleID">ASI6</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0002-8231</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Metadata has taken on a more significant role than ever before in the emerging digital library context because the effective organization of networked information clearly depends on the effective management and organization of metadata. The issue of metadata has been approached variously by different intellectual communities. The two main approaches may be characterized as: (1) the bibliographic control approach (origins and major proponents in library science); and (2) data management approach (origins and major proponents in computer science). This article examines the different conceptual foundations and orientations of the two major approaches contributing to the metadata discussion. An examination of the on‐going efforts to establish metadata standards, and comparison of different metadata formats, supports a proposal for an integrated concept of metadata to facilitate the merging of the two approaches.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>États-Unis</li></country><region><li>Floride</li><li>New Jersey</li><li>État de New York</li></region></list><tree><country name="États-Unis"><region name="Floride"><name sortKey="Burnett, Kathleen" sort="Burnett, Kathleen" uniqKey="Burnett K" first="Kathleen" last="Burnett">Kathleen Burnett</name></region><name sortKey="Ng, Kwong Bor" sort="Ng, Kwong Bor" uniqKey="Ng K" first="Kwong Bor" last="Ng">Kwong Bor Ng</name><name sortKey="Park, Soyeon" sort="Park, Soyeon" uniqKey="Park S" first="Soyeon" last="Park">Soyeon Park</name></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Ticri/explor/TeiVM2/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000363 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000363 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Ticri
|area= TeiVM2
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:C0A0B1A148FE73D00A2085080961025EAB4399F1
|texte= A comparison of the two traditions of metadata development
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |