Review of metadata formats
Identifieur interne : 000133 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000132; suivant : 000134Review of metadata formats
Auteurs : Rachel HeerySource :
- Program [ 0033-0337 ] ; 1996-04-01.
Abstract
Increasing use of the Internet has heightened awareness among the information community of the need to provide user friendly searching and navigation tools that lead to quality information. An essential part of gaining effective access to Internet resources is to provide an index of available items in order to save users time and network overload. Discussions on metadata are focused on the format of the record used as the basis for the index. Control of the vast number of resources of the Internet requires an appropriate record format or formats which will enable the resource to be adequately described and easily located records must be compatible with an appropriate search engine which in turn would ideally be compatible with a search and retrieval Internet protocol and all components should conform to international standards. At present there are a number of formats which meet at least some of these criteria, each of which has its own strengths.
Url:
DOI: 10.1108/eb047236
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:D401EC6A87035CDFD834F458E65E7787F7FF90EBLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Review of metadata formats</title><author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Heery, Rachel" sort="Heery, Rachel" uniqKey="Heery R" first="Rachel" last="Heery">Rachel Heery</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:D401EC6A87035CDFD834F458E65E7787F7FF90EB</idno><date when="1996" year="1996">1996</date><idno type="doi">10.1108/eb047236</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/D401EC6A87035CDFD834F458E65E7787F7FF90EB/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000133</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Review of metadata formats</title><author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Heery, Rachel" sort="Heery, Rachel" uniqKey="Heery R" first="Rachel" last="Heery">Rachel Heery</name></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Program</title><idno type="ISSN">0033-0337</idno><imprint><publisher>MCB UP Ltd</publisher><date type="published" when="1996-04-01">1996-04-01</date><biblScope unit="volume">30</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="345">345</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="373">373</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0033-0337</idno></series><idno type="istex">D401EC6A87035CDFD834F458E65E7787F7FF90EB</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1108/eb047236</idno><idno type="filenameID">2800300402</idno><idno type="original-pdf">2800300402.pdf</idno><idno type="href">eb047236.pdf</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0033-0337</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Increasing use of the Internet has heightened awareness among the information community of the need to provide user friendly searching and navigation tools that lead to quality information. An essential part of gaining effective access to Internet resources is to provide an index of available items in order to save users time and network overload. Discussions on metadata are focused on the format of the record used as the basis for the index. Control of the vast number of resources of the Internet requires an appropriate record format or formats which will enable the resource to be adequately described and easily located records must be compatible with an appropriate search engine which in turn would ideally be compatible with a search and retrieval Internet protocol and all components should conform to international standards. At present there are a number of formats which meet at least some of these criteria, each of which has its own strengths.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>emerald</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Rachel Heery</name></json:item></author><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>review-article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Increasing use of the Internet has heightened awareness among the information community of the need to provide user friendly searching and navigation tools that lead to quality information. An essential part of gaining effective access to Internet resources is to provide an index of available items in order to save users time and network overload. Discussions on metadata are focused on the format of the record used as the basis for the index. Control of the vast number of resources of the Internet requires an appropriate record format or formats which will enable the resource to be adequately described and easily located records must be compatible with an appropriate search engine which in turn would ideally be compatible with a search and retrieval Internet protocol and all components should conform to international standards. At present there are a number of formats which meet at least some of these criteria, each of which has its own strengths.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.872</score><pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>504 x 710.4 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><keywordCount>0</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>961</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>10711</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>65560</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>29</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>156</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Review of metadata formats</title><genre><json:string>review-article</json:string></genre><host><volume>30</volume><publisherId><json:string>prog</json:string></publisherId><pages><last>373</last><first>345</first></pages><issn><json:string>0033-0337</json:string></issn><issue>4</issue><subject><json:item><value>Information & knowledge management</value></json:item><json:item><value>Information & communications technology</value></json:item><json:item><value>Internet</value></json:item><json:item><value>Library & information science</value></json:item><json:item><value>Information behaviour & retrieval</value></json:item><json:item><value>Librarianship/library management</value></json:item><json:item><value>Metadata</value></json:item><json:item><value>Library technology</value></json:item></subject><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><title>Program</title><doi><json:string>10.1108/prog</json:string></doi></host><publicationDate>1996</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1996</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1108/eb047236</json:string></doi><id>D401EC6A87035CDFD834F458E65E7787F7FF90EB</id><score>0.27979654</score><fulltext><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><extension>pdf</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D401EC6A87035CDFD834F458E65E7787F7FF90EB/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><extension>zip</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D401EC6A87035CDFD834F458E65E7787F7FF90EB/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/D401EC6A87035CDFD834F458E65E7787F7FF90EB/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Review of metadata formats</title><respStmt xml:id="ISTEX-API" resp="Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID" name="ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)"></respStmt><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>MCB UP Ltd</publisher><availability><p>EMERALD</p></availability><date>1996</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Review of metadata formats</title><author><persName><forename type="first">Rachel</forename><surname>Heery</surname></persName></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Program</title><idno type="pISSN">0033-0337</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1108/prog</idno><imprint><publisher>MCB UP Ltd</publisher><date type="published" when="1996-04-01"></date><biblScope unit="volume">30</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="345">345</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="373">373</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">D401EC6A87035CDFD834F458E65E7787F7FF90EB</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1108/eb047236</idno><idno type="filenameID">2800300402</idno><idno type="original-pdf">2800300402.pdf</idno><idno type="href">eb047236.pdf</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1996</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Increasing use of the Internet has heightened awareness among the information community of the need to provide user friendly searching and navigation tools that lead to quality information. An essential part of gaining effective access to Internet resources is to provide an index of available items in order to save users time and network overload. Discussions on metadata are focused on the format of the record used as the basis for the index. Control of the vast number of resources of the Internet requires an appropriate record format or formats which will enable the resource to be adequately described and easily located records must be compatible with an appropriate search engine which in turn would ideally be compatible with a search and retrieval Internet protocol and all components should conform to international standards. At present there are a number of formats which meet at least some of these criteria, each of which has its own strengths.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="Emerald Subject Group"><list><label>cat-IKM</label><label>cat-ICT</label><label>cat-INT</label><item><term>Information & knowledge management</term></item><item><term>Information & communications technology</term></item><item><term>Internet</term></item></list></keywords></textClass><textClass><keywords scheme="Emerald Subject Group"><list><label>cat-LISC</label><label>cat-IBRT</label><label>cat-LLM</label><label>cat-MTD</label><label>cat-LTC</label><item><term>Library & information science</term></item><item><term>Information behaviour & retrieval</term></item><item><term>Librarianship/library management</term></item><item><term>Metadata</term></item><item><term>Library technology</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1996-04-01">Published</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2016-3-13">References added</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2016-07-29">References added</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><extension>txt</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D401EC6A87035CDFD834F458E65E7787F7FF90EB/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="corpus emerald not found" wicri:toSee="no header"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><!-- Auto generated NISO JATS XML created by Atypon out of MCB DTD source files. Do Not Edit! --><article dtd-version="1.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="review-article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">prog</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="doi">10.1108/prog</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Program</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0033-0337</issn><publisher><publisher-name>MCB UP Ltd</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1108/eb047236</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="original-pdf">2800300402.pdf</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="filename">2800300402</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="type-of-publication"><compound-subject><compound-subject-part content-type="code">review-article</compound-subject-part><compound-subject-part content-type="label">General review</compound-subject-part></compound-subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="subject"><compound-subject><compound-subject-part content-type="code">cat-IKM</compound-subject-part><compound-subject-part content-type="label">Information & knowledge management</compound-subject-part></compound-subject><subj-group><compound-subject><compound-subject-part content-type="code">cat-ICT</compound-subject-part><compound-subject-part content-type="label">Information & communications technology</compound-subject-part></compound-subject><subj-group><compound-subject><compound-subject-part content-type="code">cat-INT</compound-subject-part><compound-subject-part content-type="label">Internet</compound-subject-part></compound-subject></subj-group></subj-group></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="subject"><compound-subject><compound-subject-part content-type="code">cat-LISC</compound-subject-part><compound-subject-part content-type="label">Library & information science</compound-subject-part></compound-subject><subj-group><compound-subject><compound-subject-part content-type="code">cat-IBRT</compound-subject-part><compound-subject-part content-type="label">Information behaviour & retrieval</compound-subject-part></compound-subject><subj-group><compound-subject><compound-subject-part content-type="code">cat-MTD</compound-subject-part><compound-subject-part content-type="label">Metadata</compound-subject-part></compound-subject></subj-group></subj-group><subj-group><compound-subject><compound-subject-part content-type="code">cat-LLM</compound-subject-part><compound-subject-part content-type="label">Librarianship/library management</compound-subject-part></compound-subject><subj-group><compound-subject><compound-subject-part content-type="code">cat-LTC</compound-subject-part><compound-subject-part content-type="label">Library technology</compound-subject-part></compound-subject></subj-group></subj-group></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Review of metadata formats</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><string-name><given-names>Rachel</given-names> <surname>Heery</surname></string-name></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><day>1</day><month>4</month><year>1996</year></pub-date><volume>30</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>345</fpage><lpage>373</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>© MCB UP Limited</copyright-statement><copyright-year>1996</copyright-year><license license-type="publisher"><license-p></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="eb047236.pdf"></self-uri><abstract><p>Increasing use of the Internet has heightened awareness among the information community of the need to provide user friendly searching and navigation tools that lead to quality information. An essential part of gaining effective access to Internet resources is to provide an index of available items in order to save users time and network overload. Discussions on metadata are focused on the format of the record used as the basis for the index. Control of the vast number of resources of the Internet requires an appropriate record format (or formats) which will enable the resource to be adequately described and easily located; records must be compatible with an appropriate search engine which in turn would ideally be compatible with a search and retrieval Internet protocol and all components should conform to international standards. At present there are a number of formats which meet at least some of these criteria, each of which has its own strengths.</p></abstract><custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>peer-reviewed</meta-name><meta-value>no</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>academic-content</meta-name><meta-value>yes</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>rightslink</meta-name><meta-value>included</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front></article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Review of metadata formats</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" lang="en" contentType="CDATA"><title>Review of metadata formats</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Rachel</namePart><namePart type="family">Heery</namePart></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="review-article" displayLabel="review-article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>MCB UP Ltd</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1996-04-01</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1996</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Increasing use of the Internet has heightened awareness among the information community of the need to provide user friendly searching and navigation tools that lead to quality information. An essential part of gaining effective access to Internet resources is to provide an index of available items in order to save users time and network overload. Discussions on metadata are focused on the format of the record used as the basis for the index. Control of the vast number of resources of the Internet requires an appropriate record format or formats which will enable the resource to be adequately described and easily located records must be compatible with an appropriate search engine which in turn would ideally be compatible with a search and retrieval Internet protocol and all components should conform to international standards. At present there are a number of formats which meet at least some of these criteria, each of which has its own strengths.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Program</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><subject><genre>Emerald Subject Group</genre><topic authority="SubjectCodesPrimary" authorityURI="cat-IKM">Information & knowledge management</topic><topic authority="SubjectCodesSecondary" authorityURI="cat-ICT">Information & communications technology</topic><topic authority="SubjectCodesSecondary" authorityURI="cat-INT">Internet</topic></subject><subject><genre>Emerald Subject Group</genre><topic authority="SubjectCodesPrimary" authorityURI="cat-LISC">Library & information science</topic><topic authority="SubjectCodesSecondary" authorityURI="cat-IBRT">Information behaviour & retrieval</topic><topic authority="SubjectCodesSecondary" authorityURI="cat-LLM">Librarianship/library management</topic><topic authority="SubjectCodesSecondary" authorityURI="cat-MTD">Metadata</topic><topic authority="SubjectCodesSecondary" authorityURI="cat-LTC">Library technology</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0033-0337</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">prog</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1108/prog</identifier><part><date>1996</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>30</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>4</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>345</start><end>373</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">D401EC6A87035CDFD834F458E65E7787F7FF90EB</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1108/eb047236</identifier><identifier type="filenameID">2800300402</identifier><identifier type="original-pdf">2800300402.pdf</identifier><identifier type="href">eb047236.pdf</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© MCB UP Limited</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>EMERALD</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods></metadata><enrichments><json:item><type>refBibs</type><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D401EC6A87035CDFD834F458E65E7787F7FF90EB/enrichments/refBibs</uri></json:item></enrichments><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Ticri/explor/TeiVM2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000133 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000133 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Ticri
|area= TeiVM2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:D401EC6A87035CDFD834F458E65E7787F7FF90EB
|texte= Review of metadata formats
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |