Plant‐parasitic nematodes of potential phytosanitary importance, their main hosts and reported yield losses
Identifieur interne : 001976 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001975; suivant : 001977Plant‐parasitic nematodes of potential phytosanitary importance, their main hosts and reported yield losses
Auteurs : S. K. Singh ; M. Hodda ; G. J. AshSource :
- EPPO Bulletin [ 0250-8052 ] ; 2013-08.
Abstract
The potential phytosanitary importance of all named plant‐parasitic nematode species was determined by evaluating available information on species characteristics, association with economically‐important crop hosts, and ability to act as vectors of viruses or form disease complexes with other pathogens. Most named species of plant‐parasitic nematodes (PPN) are poorly known, recorded from a single location only, not associated with economically‐important crops, and not known to be associated with other plant disease organisms. However, 250 species from 43 genera fulfilled one or more of the criteria to be considered to present a phytosanitary risk. The genera and number of species (in parentheses) considered as posing phytosanitary risk included: Achlysiella (1), Anguina (8), Aphasmatylenchus (1), Aphelenchoides (12), Aphelenchus (1), Belonolaimus (2), Bitylenchus (3), Bursaphelenchus (4), Cactodera (3), Ditylenchus (8), Dolichodorus (1), Globodera (3), Helicotylenchus (7), Hemicriconemoides (3), Hemicycliophora (3), Heterodera (25), Hirschmanniella (5), Hoplolaimus (5), Ibipora (3), Longidorus (10), Macroposthonia (2), Meloidogyne (38), Merlinius (3), Nacobbus (1), Neodolichodorus (2), Paralongidorus (2), Paratrichodorus (11), Paratylenchus (3), Pratylenchus (24), Punctodera (3), Quinisulcius (3), Radopholus (5), Rotylenchulus (3), Rotylenchus (1), Scutellonema (5), Sphaeronema (1), Subanguina (3), Trichodorus (5), Tylenchorhynchus (8), Tylenchulus (2), Vittatidera (1), Xiphinema (15) and Zygotylenchus (1). For each of the 250 species main hosts and yield loss estimates are provided with an extensive bibliography. Of the 250 species, only 126 species from 33 genera are currently listed as regulated pests in one or more countries worldwide. Almost all of these 250 species were also associated with economically important crops and some also acted as vectors for viruses.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/epp.12050
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:8C082C78F81ADF3105C48D265B1313966F52DAF5Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Plant‐parasitic nematodes of potential phytosanitary importance, their main hosts and reported yield losses</title><author><name sortKey="Singh, S K" sort="Singh, S K" uniqKey="Singh S" first="S. K." last="Singh">S. K. Singh</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, 2601, Canberra, ACT, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation (an alliance between Charles Sturt University and the NSW Department of Primary Industries), 2678, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Cooperative Research Centre for National Plant Biosecurity, 2617, Bruce, ACT, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>CSIRO Biosecurity Flagship, ACT, 2601, Canberra, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: sunil.singh@csiro.au</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hodda, M" sort="Hodda, M" uniqKey="Hodda M" first="M." last="Hodda">M. Hodda</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, 2601, Canberra, ACT, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>CSIRO Biosecurity Flagship, ACT, 2601, Canberra, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: mike.hodda@csiro.au</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ash, G J" sort="Ash, G J" uniqKey="Ash G" first="G. J." last="Ash">G. J. Ash</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation (an alliance between Charles Sturt University and the NSW Department of Primary Industries), NSW, 2678, Wagga Wagga, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:8C082C78F81ADF3105C48D265B1313966F52DAF5</idno><date when="2013" year="2013">2013</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/epp.12050</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/8C082C78F81ADF3105C48D265B1313966F52DAF5/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001976</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Plant‐parasitic nematodes of potential phytosanitary importance, their main hosts and reported yield losses</title><author><name sortKey="Singh, S K" sort="Singh, S K" uniqKey="Singh S" first="S. K." last="Singh">S. K. Singh</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, 2601, Canberra, ACT, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation (an alliance between Charles Sturt University and the NSW Department of Primary Industries), 2678, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Cooperative Research Centre for National Plant Biosecurity, 2617, Bruce, ACT, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>CSIRO Biosecurity Flagship, ACT, 2601, Canberra, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: sunil.singh@csiro.au</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hodda, M" sort="Hodda, M" uniqKey="Hodda M" first="M." last="Hodda">M. Hodda</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, 2601, Canberra, ACT, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>CSIRO Biosecurity Flagship, ACT, 2601, Canberra, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: mike.hodda@csiro.au</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ash, G J" sort="Ash, G J" uniqKey="Ash G" first="G. J." last="Ash">G. J. Ash</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation (an alliance between Charles Sturt University and the NSW Department of Primary Industries), NSW, 2678, Wagga Wagga, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">EPPO Bulletin</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">EPPO Bull</title><idno type="ISSN">0250-8052</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2338</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><date type="published" when="2013-08">2013-08</date><biblScope unit="volume">43</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="334">334</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="374">374</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0250-8052</idno></series><idno type="istex">8C082C78F81ADF3105C48D265B1313966F52DAF5</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/epp.12050</idno><idno type="ArticleID">EPP12050</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0250-8052</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">The potential phytosanitary importance of all named plant‐parasitic nematode species was determined by evaluating available information on species characteristics, association with economically‐important crop hosts, and ability to act as vectors of viruses or form disease complexes with other pathogens. Most named species of plant‐parasitic nematodes (PPN) are poorly known, recorded from a single location only, not associated with economically‐important crops, and not known to be associated with other plant disease organisms. However, 250 species from 43 genera fulfilled one or more of the criteria to be considered to present a phytosanitary risk. The genera and number of species (in parentheses) considered as posing phytosanitary risk included: Achlysiella (1), Anguina (8), Aphasmatylenchus (1), Aphelenchoides (12), Aphelenchus (1), Belonolaimus (2), Bitylenchus (3), Bursaphelenchus (4), Cactodera (3), Ditylenchus (8), Dolichodorus (1), Globodera (3), Helicotylenchus (7), Hemicriconemoides (3), Hemicycliophora (3), Heterodera (25), Hirschmanniella (5), Hoplolaimus (5), Ibipora (3), Longidorus (10), Macroposthonia (2), Meloidogyne (38), Merlinius (3), Nacobbus (1), Neodolichodorus (2), Paralongidorus (2), Paratrichodorus (11), Paratylenchus (3), Pratylenchus (24), Punctodera (3), Quinisulcius (3), Radopholus (5), Rotylenchulus (3), Rotylenchus (1), Scutellonema (5), Sphaeronema (1), Subanguina (3), Trichodorus (5), Tylenchorhynchus (8), Tylenchulus (2), Vittatidera (1), Xiphinema (15) and Zygotylenchus (1). For each of the 250 species main hosts and yield loss estimates are provided with an extensive bibliography. Of the 250 species, only 126 species from 33 genera are currently listed as regulated pests in one or more countries worldwide. Almost all of these 250 species were also associated with economically important crops and some also acted as vectors for viruses.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>S. K. Singh</name><affiliations><json:string>CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, 2601, Canberra, ACT, Australia</json:string><json:string>Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation (an alliance between Charles Sturt University and the NSW Department of Primary Industries), 2678, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia</json:string><json:string>Cooperative Research Centre for National Plant Biosecurity, 2617, Bruce, ACT, Australia</json:string><json:string>CSIRO Biosecurity Flagship, ACT, 2601, Canberra, Australia</json:string><json:string>E-mail: sunil.singh@csiro.au</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>M. Hodda</name><affiliations><json:string>CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, 2601, Canberra, ACT, Australia</json:string><json:string>CSIRO Biosecurity Flagship, ACT, 2601, Canberra, Australia</json:string><json:string>E-mail: mike.hodda@csiro.au</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>G. J. Ash</name><affiliations><json:string>Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation (an alliance between Charles Sturt University and the NSW Department of Primary Industries), NSW, 2678, Wagga Wagga, Australia</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>EPP12050</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><qualityIndicators><score>10</score><pdfVersion>1.7</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><keywordCount>0</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>1900</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>32360</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>212831</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>41</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>254</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Plant‐parasitic nematodes of potential phytosanitary importance, their main hosts and reported yield losses</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>43</volume><publisherId><json:string>EPP</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>41</total><last>374</last><first>334</first></pages><issn><json:string>0250-8052</json:string></issn><issue>2</issue><subject><json:item><value>Original Article</value></json:item></subject><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1365-2338</json:string></eissn><title>EPPO Bulletin</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2338</json:string></doi></host><publicationDate>2013</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2013</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/epp.12050</json:string></doi><id>8C082C78F81ADF3105C48D265B1313966F52DAF5</id><score>0.21112545</score><fulltext><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><extension>pdf</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8C082C78F81ADF3105C48D265B1313966F52DAF5/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><extension>zip</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8C082C78F81ADF3105C48D265B1313966F52DAF5/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/8C082C78F81ADF3105C48D265B1313966F52DAF5/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Plant‐parasitic nematodes of potential phytosanitary importance, their main hosts and reported yield losses</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><availability><p>Journal compilation © 2013 Organisation Européenne et Méditerranéenne pour la Protection des Plantes/European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization© 2013 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2013 OEPP/EPPO</p></availability><date>2013-06-12</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Plant‐parasitic nematodes of potential phytosanitary importance, their main hosts and reported yield losses</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">S. K.</forename><surname>Singh</surname></persName><email>sunil.singh@csiro.au</email><affiliation>CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, 2601, Canberra, ACT, Australia</affiliation><affiliation>Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation (an alliance between Charles Sturt University and the NSW Department of Primary Industries), 2678, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia</affiliation><affiliation>Cooperative Research Centre for National Plant Biosecurity, 2617, Bruce, ACT, Australia</affiliation><affiliation>CSIRO Biosecurity Flagship, ACT, 2601, Canberra, Australia</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">M.</forename><surname>Hodda</surname></persName><email>mike.hodda@csiro.au</email><affiliation>CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, 2601, Canberra, ACT, Australia</affiliation><affiliation>CSIRO Biosecurity Flagship, ACT, 2601, Canberra, Australia</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-3"><persName><forename type="first">G. J.</forename><surname>Ash</surname></persName><affiliation>Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation (an alliance between Charles Sturt University and the NSW Department of Primary Industries), NSW, 2678, Wagga Wagga, Australia</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">EPPO Bulletin</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">EPPO Bull</title><idno type="pISSN">0250-8052</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2338</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2338</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><date type="published" when="2013-08"></date><biblScope unit="volume">43</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="334">334</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="374">374</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">8C082C78F81ADF3105C48D265B1313966F52DAF5</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/epp.12050</idno><idno type="ArticleID">EPP12050</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2013-06-12</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract><p>The potential phytosanitary importance of all named plant‐parasitic nematode species was determined by evaluating available information on species characteristics, association with economically‐important crop hosts, and ability to act as vectors of viruses or form disease complexes with other pathogens. Most named species of plant‐parasitic nematodes (PPN) are poorly known, recorded from a single location only, not associated with economically‐important crops, and not known to be associated with other plant disease organisms. However, 250 species from 43 genera fulfilled one or more of the criteria to be considered to present a phytosanitary risk. The genera and number of species (in parentheses) considered as posing phytosanitary risk included: Achlysiella (1), Anguina (8), Aphasmatylenchus (1), Aphelenchoides (12), Aphelenchus (1), Belonolaimus (2), Bitylenchus (3), Bursaphelenchus (4), Cactodera (3), Ditylenchus (8), Dolichodorus (1), Globodera (3), Helicotylenchus (7), Hemicriconemoides (3), Hemicycliophora (3), Heterodera (25), Hirschmanniella (5), Hoplolaimus (5), Ibipora (3), Longidorus (10), Macroposthonia (2), Meloidogyne (38), Merlinius (3), Nacobbus (1), Neodolichodorus (2), Paralongidorus (2), Paratrichodorus (11), Paratylenchus (3), Pratylenchus (24), Punctodera (3), Quinisulcius (3), Radopholus (5), Rotylenchulus (3), Rotylenchus (1), Scutellonema (5), Sphaeronema (1), Subanguina (3), Trichodorus (5), Tylenchorhynchus (8), Tylenchulus (2), Vittatidera (1), Xiphinema (15) and Zygotylenchus (1). For each of the 250 species main hosts and yield loss estimates are provided with an extensive bibliography. Of the 250 species, only 126 species from 33 genera are currently listed as regulated pests in one or more countries worldwide. Almost all of these 250 species were also associated with economically important crops and some also acted as vectors for viruses.</p></abstract><abstract xml:lang="fr"><p>L'importance phytosanitaire potentielle de l'ensemble des espèces de nématodes parasites des végétaux a été déterminée en évaluant les informations disponibles sur les caractéristiques de chacune des espèces, leur association avec des cultures économiquement importantes, et leur capacité à être vecteurs de virus ou de former des complexes de maladies avec d'autres agents pathogènes. La plupart des espèces de nématodes parasites des plantes décrites sont mal connues, ont été observées en un seul endroit, ne sont pas associés avec des cultures économiquement importantes, et ne sont pas connues pour être associées avec d'autres organismes phytopathogènes. Cependant, 250 espèces appartenant à 43 genres ont satisfait au moins un des critères à prendre en compte pour être considéré comme présentant un risque phytosanitaire. Les genres et les nombres d'espèces (entre parenthèses) considérés comme présentant un risque phytosanitaire comprenaient: Achlysiella (1), Anguina (8), Aphasmatylenchus (1), Aphelenchoides (12), Aphelenchus (1), Belonolaimus (2), Bitylenchus (3), Bursaphelenchus (4), Cactodera (3), Ditylenchus (8), Dolichodorus (1), Globodera (3), Helicotylenchus (7), Hemicriconemoides (3), Hemicycliophora (3), Heterodera (25), Hirschmanniella (5), Hoplolaimus (5), Ibipora (3), Longidorus (10), Macroposthonia (2), Meloidogyne (38), Merlinius (3), Nacobbus (1), Neodolichodorus (2), Paralongidorus (2), Paratrichodorus (11), Paratylenchus (3), Pratylenchus (24), Punctodera (3), Quinisulcius (3), Radopholus (5), Rotylenchulus (3), Rotylenchus (1), Scutellonema (5), Sphaeronema (1), Subanguina (3), Trichodorus (5), Tylenchorhynchus (8), Tylenchulus (2), Vittatidera (1), Xiphinema (15), and Zygotylenchus (1). Pour chacune des 250 espèces, les hôtes principaux et des estimations de pertes de rendement sont fournies avec une bibliographie détaillée. Parmi les 250 espèces, seulement 126 espèces parmi 33 genres sont actuellement listées comme des organismes règlementés dans un ou plusieurs pays dans le monde. Presque toutes ces 250 espèces étaient associées à des cultures économiquement importantes, et certaines agissaient également comme vecteur pour des virus.</p></abstract><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Пoтeнциaльнoe знaчeниe для фитocaнитapии кaждoгo из yкaзaнныx видoв нeмaтoд oпpeдeлялocь пyтeм oцeнки cyщecтвyющиx дaнныx пo xapaктepиcтикaм видa, coвмecтимocти c экoнoмичecки знaчимыми пoтepями ypoжaйнocти и иx cпocoбнocти дeйcтвoвaть в кaчecтвe пepeнocчикoв виpycoв или бoлeзнeтвopныx кoмплeкcoв в coчeтaнии c дpyгими пaтoгeнaми. Чaщe вceгo цитиpyeмыe виды пapaзитиpyющиx нa pacтeнияx нeмaтoд (PPN) плoxo изyчeны, зapeгиcтpиpoвaны oни лишь в oднoй тoчкe, нe cвязaны c экoнoмичecки знaчимыми кyльтypaми и нe извecтнo, coчeтaютcя ли oни c дpyгими бoлeзнeтвopными вpeдными opгaнизмaми pacтeний. Oднaкo 250 видoв из 43 poдoв oтвeчaли oднoмy или нecкoльким кpитepиям, кoтopыe чpeвaты фитocaнитapным pиcкoм. Poды и чиcлo видoв (в кpyглыx cкoбкax), кoтopыe cчитaютcя кaк пpeдcтaвляющиe фитocaнитapный pиcк пpивoдятcя: Achlysiella (1), Anguina (8), Aphasmatylenchus (1), Aphelenchoides (12), Aphelenchus (1), Belonolaimus (2), Bitylenchus (3), Bursaphelenchus (4), Cactodera (3), Ditylenchus (8), Dolichodorus (1), Globodera (3), Helicotylenchus (7), Hemicriconemoides (3), Hemicycliophora (3), Heterodera (25), Hirschmanniella (5), Hoplolaimus (5), Ibipora (3), Longidorus (10), Macroposthonia (2), Meloidogyne (38), Merlinius (3), Nacobbus (1), Neodolichodorus (2), Paralongidorus (2), Paratrichodorus (11), Paratylenchus (3), Pratylenchus (24), Punctodera (3), Quinisulcius (3), Radopholus (5), Rotylenchulus (3), Rotylenchus (1), Scutellonema (5), Sphaeronema (1), Subanguina (3), Trichodorus (5), Tylenchorhynchus (8), Tylenchulus (2), Vittatidera (1), Xiphinema (15), a тaкжe Zygotylenchus (1). Для кaждoгo из 250 видoв ocнoвныe pacтeния‐xoзяeвa yзлaм и oцeнки пoтepь ypoжaйнocти пpeдocтaвлeны oбшиpнoй библиoгpaфиeй. Из 250 видoв тoлькo 126 из 33 poдoв в нacтoящee вpeмя зapeгиcтpиpoвaны кaк peгyлиpyeмыe вpeдныe opгaнизмы в oднoй или бoлee cтpaнax вo вceм миpe. Пoчти вce эти 250 видoв были тaкжe cвязaны c экoнoмичecки вaжными кyльтypaми, a нeкoтopыe из ниx тaкжe дeйcтвoвaли кaк пepeнocчики виpycoв.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="Journal Subject"><list><head>article-category</head><item><term>Original Article</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2013-06-12">Created</change><change when="2013-08">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><extension>txt</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8C082C78F81ADF3105C48D265B1313966F52DAF5/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component type="serialArticle" version="2.0" xml:id="epp12050" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2338</doi><issn type="print">0250-8052</issn><issn type="electronic">1365-2338</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="EPP"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title sort="EPPO BULLETIN" type="main">EPPO Bulletin</title><title type="short">EPPO Bull</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="08102"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/epp.2013.43.issue-2</doi><copyright ownership="thirdParty">Journal compilation © 2013 Organisation Européenne et Méditerranéenne pour la Protection des Plantes/European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization</copyright><numberingGroup><numbering number="43" type="journalVolume">43</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2013-08">August 2013</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" position="21" status="forIssue" type="article"><doi>10.1111/epp.12050</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="EPP12050"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count number="41" type="pageTotal"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Original Article</title><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="thirdParty">© 2013 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2013 OEPP/EPPO</copyright><eventGroup><event agent="SPS" date="2013-06-12" type="xmlCreated"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2013-07-16"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2013-07-16"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.6.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-10-03"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">334</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">374</numbering></numberingGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:EPP.EPP12050.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><titleGroup><title type="main">Plant‐parasitic nematodes of potential phytosanitary importance, their main hosts and reported yield losses</title><title type="shortAuthors">S. K. Singh <i>et al</i>.</title></titleGroup><creators><creator affiliationRef="#epp12050-aff-0001 #epp12050-aff-0002 #epp12050-aff-0003 #epp12050-aff-0004" creatorRole="author" xml:id="epp12050-cr-0001"><personName><givenNames>S. K.</givenNames> <familyName>Singh</familyName></personName><contactDetails><email>sunil.singh@csiro.au</email></contactDetails></creator><creator affiliationRef="#epp12050-aff-0001 #epp12050-aff-0004" creatorRole="author" xml:id="epp12050-cr-0002"><personName><givenNames>M.</givenNames> <familyName>Hodda</familyName></personName><contactDetails><email>mike.hodda@csiro.au</email></contactDetails></creator><creator affiliationRef="#epp12050-aff-0002" creatorRole="author" xml:id="epp12050-cr-0003"><personName><givenNames>G. J.</givenNames> <familyName>Ash</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation countryCode="AU" type="organization" xml:id="epp12050-aff-0001"><orgName>CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences</orgName> <address><city>Canberra</city> <countryPart>ACT</countryPart> <postCode>2601</postCode> <country>Australia</country></address></affiliation><affiliation countryCode="AU" type="organization" xml:id="epp12050-aff-0002"><orgName>Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation (an alliance between Charles Sturt University and the NSW Department of Primary Industries)</orgName> <address><city>Wagga Wagga</city> <countryPart>NSW</countryPart> <postCode>2678</postCode> <country>Australia</country></address></affiliation><affiliation countryCode="AU" type="organization" xml:id="epp12050-aff-0003"><orgName>Cooperative Research Centre for National Plant Biosecurity</orgName> <address><city>Bruce</city> <countryPart>ACT</countryPart> <postCode>2617</postCode> <country>Australia</country></address></affiliation><affiliation countryCode="AU" type="organization" xml:id="epp12050-aff-0004"><orgName>CSIRO Biosecurity Flagship</orgName> <address><city>Canberra</city> <countryPart>ACT</countryPart> <postCode>2601</postCode> <country>Australia</country></address></affiliation></affiliationGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:id="epp12050-abs-0001"><p>The potential phytosanitary importance of all named plant‐parasitic nematode species was determined by evaluating available information on species characteristics, association with economically‐important crop hosts, and ability to act as vectors of viruses or form disease complexes with other pathogens. Most named species of plant‐parasitic nematodes (<fc>PPN</fc>) are poorly known, recorded from a single location only, not associated with economically‐important crops, and not known to be associated with other plant disease organisms. However, 250 species from 43 genera fulfilled one or more of the criteria to be considered to present a phytosanitary risk. The genera and number of species (in parentheses) considered as posing phytosanitary risk included: <i><fc>A</fc>chlysiella</i> (1), <i><fc>A</fc>nguina</i> (8), <i><fc>A</fc>phasmatylenchus</i> (1), <i><fc>A</fc>phelenchoides</i> (12), <i><fc>A</fc>phelenchus</i> (1), <i><fc>B</fc>elonolaimus</i> (2), <i><fc>B</fc>itylenchus</i> (3), <i><fc>B</fc>ursaphelenchus</i> (4), <i><fc>C</fc>actodera</i> (3), <i><fc>D</fc>itylenchus</i> (8), <i><fc>D</fc>olichodorus</i> (1), <i><fc>G</fc>lobodera</i> (3), <i><fc>H</fc>elicotylenchus</i> (7), <i><fc>H</fc>emicriconemoides</i> (3), <i><fc>H</fc>emicycliophora</i> (3), <i><fc>H</fc>eterodera</i> (25), <i><fc>H</fc>irschmanniella</i> (5), <i><fc>H</fc>oplolaimus</i> (5), <i><fc>I</fc>bipora</i> (3), <i><fc>L</fc>ongidorus</i> (10), <i><fc>M</fc>acroposthonia</i> (2), <i><fc>M</fc>eloidogyne</i> (38), <i><fc>M</fc>erlinius</i> (3), <i><fc>N</fc>acobbus</i> (1), <i><fc>N</fc>eodolichodorus</i> (2), <i><fc>P</fc>aralongidorus</i> (2), <i><fc>P</fc>aratrichodorus</i> (11), <i><fc>P</fc>aratylenchus</i> (3), <i><fc>P</fc>ratylenchus</i> (24), <i><fc>P</fc>unctodera</i> (3), <i><fc>Q</fc>uinisulcius</i> (3), <i><fc>R</fc>adopholus</i> (5), <i><fc>R</fc>otylenchulus</i> (3), <i><fc>R</fc>otylenchus</i> (1), <i><fc>S</fc>cutellonema</i> (5), <i><fc>S</fc>phaeronema</i> (1), <i><fc>S</fc>ubanguina</i> (3), <i><fc>T</fc>richodorus</i> (5), <i><fc>T</fc>ylenchorhynchus</i> (8), <i><fc>T</fc>ylenchulus</i> (2), <i><fc>V</fc>ittatidera</i> (1), <i><fc>X</fc>iphinema</i> (15) and <i><fc>Z</fc>ygotylenchus</i> (1). For each of the 250 species main hosts and yield loss estimates are provided with an extensive bibliography. Of the 250 species, only 126 species from 33 genera are currently listed as regulated pests in one or more countries worldwide. Almost all of these 250 species were also associated with economically important crops and some also acted as vectors for viruses.</p></abstract><abstract type="main" xml:id="epp12050-abs-0002" xml:lang="fr"><title type="main">Les nématodes parasites des plantes d'importance phytosantaire, leurs hôtes principaux, et les pertes de récolte relevées</title><p>L'importance phytosanitaire potentielle de l'ensemble des espèces de nématodes parasites des végétaux a été déterminée en évaluant les informations disponibles sur les caractéristiques de chacune des espèces, leur association avec des cultures économiquement importantes, et leur capacité à être vecteurs de virus ou de former des complexes de maladies avec d'autres agents pathogènes. La plupart des espèces de nématodes parasites des plantes décrites sont mal connues, ont été observées en un seul endroit, ne sont pas associés avec des cultures économiquement importantes, et ne sont pas connues pour être associées avec d'autres organismes phytopathogènes. Cependant, 250 espèces appartenant à 43 genres ont satisfait au moins un des critères à prendre en compte pour être considéré comme présentant un risque phytosanitaire. Les genres et les nombres d'espèces (entre parenthèses) considérés comme présentant un risque phytosanitaire comprenaient: <i>Achlysiella</i> (1), <i>Anguina</i> (8), <i>Aphasmatylenchus</i> (1), <i>Aphelenchoides</i> (12), <i>Aphelenchus</i> (1), <i>Belonolaimus</i> (2), <i>Bitylenchus</i> (3), <i>Bursaphelenchus</i> (4), <i>Cactodera</i> (3), <i>Ditylenchus</i> (8), <i>Dolichodorus</i> (1), <i>Globodera</i> (3), <i>Helicotylenchus</i> (7), <i>Hemicriconemoides</i> (3), <i>Hemicycliophora</i> (3), <i>Heterodera</i> (25), <i>Hirschmanniella</i> (5), <i>Hoplolaimus</i> (5), <i>Ibipora</i> (3), <i>Longidorus</i> (10), <i>Macroposthonia</i> (2), <i>Meloidogyne</i> (38), <i>Merlinius</i> (3), <i>Nacobbus</i> (1), <i>Neodolichodorus</i> (2), <i>Paralongidorus</i> (2), <i>Paratrichodorus</i> (11), <i>Paratylenchus</i> (3), <i>Pratylenchus</i> (24), <i>Punctodera</i> (3), <i>Quinisulcius</i> (3), <i>Radopholus</i> (5), <i>Rotylenchulus</i> (3), <i>Rotylenchus</i> (1), <i>Scutellonema</i> (5), <i>Sphaeronema</i> (1), <i>Subanguina</i> (3), <i>Trichodorus</i> (5), <i>Tylenchorhynchus</i> (8), <i>Tylenchulus</i> (2), <i>Vittatidera</i> (1), <i>Xiphinema</i> (15), and <i>Zygotylenchus</i> (1). Pour chacune des 250 espèces, les hôtes principaux et des estimations de pertes de rendement sont fournies avec une bibliographie détaillée. Parmi les 250 espèces, seulement 126 espèces parmi 33 genres sont actuellement listées comme des organismes règlementés dans un ou plusieurs pays dans le monde. Presque toutes ces 250 espèces étaient associées à des cultures économiquement importantes, et certaines agissaient également comme vecteur pour des virus.</p></abstract><abstract type="main" xml:id="epp12050-abs-0003" xml:lang="ru"><title type="main">Пapaзитиpyющиe нa pacтeнияx нeмaтoды, имeющиe пoтeнциaльнoe знaчeниe для фитocaнитapии, иx ocнoвныe pacтeния‐xoзяeвa и cooбщaeмыe пoтepи ypoжaйнocти</title><p>Пoтeнциaльнoe знaчeниe для фитocaнитapии кaждoгo из yкaзaнныx видoв нeмaтoд oпpeдeлялocь пyтeм oцeнки cyщecтвyющиx дaнныx пo xapaктepиcтикaм видa, coвмecтимocти c экoнoмичecки знaчимыми пoтepями ypoжaйнocти и иx cпocoбнocти дeйcтвoвaть в кaчecтвe пepeнocчикoв виpycoв или бoлeзнeтвopныx кoмплeкcoв в coчeтaнии c дpyгими пaтoгeнaми. Чaщe вceгo цитиpyeмыe виды пapaзитиpyющиx нa pacтeнияx нeмaтoд (<fc>PPN</fc>) плoxo изyчeны, зapeгиcтpиpoвaны oни лишь в oднoй тoчкe, нe cвязaны c экoнoмичecки знaчимыми кyльтypaми и нe извecтнo, coчeтaютcя ли oни c дpyгими бoлeзнeтвopными вpeдными opгaнизмaми pacтeний. Oднaкo 250 видoв из 43 poдoв oтвeчaли oднoмy или нecкoльким кpитepиям, кoтopыe чpeвaты фитocaнитapным pиcкoм. Poды и чиcлo видoв (в кpyглыx cкoбкax), кoтopыe cчитaютcя кaк пpeдcтaвляющиe фитocaнитapный pиcк пpивoдятcя: <i>Achlysiella</i> (1), <i>Anguina</i> (8), <i>Aphasmatylenchus</i> (1), <i>Aphelenchoides</i> (12), <i>Aphelenchus</i> (1), <i>Belonolaimus</i> (2), <i>Bitylenchus</i> (3), <i>Bursaphelenchus</i> (4), <i>Cactodera</i> (3), <i>Ditylenchus</i> (8), <i>Dolichodorus</i> (1), <i>Globodera</i> (3), <i>Helicotylenchus</i> (7), <i>Hemicriconemoides</i> (3), <i>Hemicycliophora</i> (3), <i>Heterodera</i> (25), <i>Hirschmanniella</i> (5), <i>Hoplolaimus</i> (5), <i>Ibipora</i> (3), <i>Longidorus</i> (10), <i>Macroposthonia</i> (2), <i>Meloidogyne</i> (38), <i>Merlinius</i> (3), <i>Nacobbus</i> (1), <i>Neodolichodorus</i> (2), <i>Paralongidorus</i> (2), <i>Paratrichodorus</i> (11), <i>Paratylenchus</i> (3), <i>Pratylenchus</i> (24), <i>Punctodera</i> (3), <i>Quinisulcius</i> (3), <i>Radopholus</i> (5), <i>Rotylenchulus</i> (3), <i>Rotylenchus</i> (1), <i>Scutellonema</i> (5), <i>Sphaeronema</i> (1), <i>Subanguina</i> (3), <i>Trichodorus</i> (5), <i>Tylenchorhynchus</i> (8), <i>Tylenchulus</i> (2), <i>Vittatidera</i> (1), <i>Xiphinema</i> (15), a тaкжe <i>Zygotylenchus</i> (1). Для кaждoгo из 250 видoв ocнoвныe pacтeния‐xoзяeвa yзлaм и oцeнки пoтepь ypoжaйнocти пpeдocтaвлeны oбшиpнoй библиoгpaфиeй. Из 250 видoв тoлькo 126 из 33 poдoв в нacтoящee вpeмя зapeгиcтpиpoвaны кaк peгyлиpyeмыe вpeдныe opгaнизмы в oднoй или бoлee cтpaнax вo вceм миpe. Пoчти вce эти 250 видoв были тaкжe cвязaны c экoнoмичecки вaжными кyльтypaми, a нeкoтopыe из ниx тaкжe дeйcтвoвaли кaк пepeнocчики виpycoв.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Plant‐parasitic nematodes of potential phytosanitary importance, their main hosts and reported yield losses</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Plant‐parasitic nematodes of potential phytosanitary importance, their main hosts and reported yield losses</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">S. K.</namePart><namePart type="family">Singh</namePart><affiliation>CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, 2601, Canberra, ACT, Australia</affiliation><affiliation>Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation (an alliance between Charles Sturt University and the NSW Department of Primary Industries), 2678, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia</affiliation><affiliation>Cooperative Research Centre for National Plant Biosecurity, 2617, Bruce, ACT, Australia</affiliation><affiliation>CSIRO Biosecurity Flagship, ACT, 2601, Canberra, Australia</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: sunil.singh@csiro.au</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">M.</namePart><namePart type="family">Hodda</namePart><affiliation>CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, 2601, Canberra, ACT, Australia</affiliation><affiliation>CSIRO Biosecurity Flagship, ACT, 2601, Canberra, Australia</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: mike.hodda@csiro.au</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">G. J.</namePart><namePart type="family">Ash</namePart><affiliation>Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation (an alliance between Charles Sturt University and the NSW Department of Primary Industries), NSW, 2678, Wagga Wagga, Australia</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2013-08</dateIssued><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2013-06-12</dateCreated><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2013</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract>The potential phytosanitary importance of all named plant‐parasitic nematode species was determined by evaluating available information on species characteristics, association with economically‐important crop hosts, and ability to act as vectors of viruses or form disease complexes with other pathogens. Most named species of plant‐parasitic nematodes (PPN) are poorly known, recorded from a single location only, not associated with economically‐important crops, and not known to be associated with other plant disease organisms. However, 250 species from 43 genera fulfilled one or more of the criteria to be considered to present a phytosanitary risk. The genera and number of species (in parentheses) considered as posing phytosanitary risk included: Achlysiella (1), Anguina (8), Aphasmatylenchus (1), Aphelenchoides (12), Aphelenchus (1), Belonolaimus (2), Bitylenchus (3), Bursaphelenchus (4), Cactodera (3), Ditylenchus (8), Dolichodorus (1), Globodera (3), Helicotylenchus (7), Hemicriconemoides (3), Hemicycliophora (3), Heterodera (25), Hirschmanniella (5), Hoplolaimus (5), Ibipora (3), Longidorus (10), Macroposthonia (2), Meloidogyne (38), Merlinius (3), Nacobbus (1), Neodolichodorus (2), Paralongidorus (2), Paratrichodorus (11), Paratylenchus (3), Pratylenchus (24), Punctodera (3), Quinisulcius (3), Radopholus (5), Rotylenchulus (3), Rotylenchus (1), Scutellonema (5), Sphaeronema (1), Subanguina (3), Trichodorus (5), Tylenchorhynchus (8), Tylenchulus (2), Vittatidera (1), Xiphinema (15) and Zygotylenchus (1). For each of the 250 species main hosts and yield loss estimates are provided with an extensive bibliography. Of the 250 species, only 126 species from 33 genera are currently listed as regulated pests in one or more countries worldwide. Almost all of these 250 species were also associated with economically important crops and some also acted as vectors for viruses.</abstract><abstract lang="fr">L'importance phytosanitaire potentielle de l'ensemble des espèces de nématodes parasites des végétaux a été déterminée en évaluant les informations disponibles sur les caractéristiques de chacune des espèces, leur association avec des cultures économiquement importantes, et leur capacité à être vecteurs de virus ou de former des complexes de maladies avec d'autres agents pathogènes. La plupart des espèces de nématodes parasites des plantes décrites sont mal connues, ont été observées en un seul endroit, ne sont pas associés avec des cultures économiquement importantes, et ne sont pas connues pour être associées avec d'autres organismes phytopathogènes. Cependant, 250 espèces appartenant à 43 genres ont satisfait au moins un des critères à prendre en compte pour être considéré comme présentant un risque phytosanitaire. Les genres et les nombres d'espèces (entre parenthèses) considérés comme présentant un risque phytosanitaire comprenaient: Achlysiella (1), Anguina (8), Aphasmatylenchus (1), Aphelenchoides (12), Aphelenchus (1), Belonolaimus (2), Bitylenchus (3), Bursaphelenchus (4), Cactodera (3), Ditylenchus (8), Dolichodorus (1), Globodera (3), Helicotylenchus (7), Hemicriconemoides (3), Hemicycliophora (3), Heterodera (25), Hirschmanniella (5), Hoplolaimus (5), Ibipora (3), Longidorus (10), Macroposthonia (2), Meloidogyne (38), Merlinius (3), Nacobbus (1), Neodolichodorus (2), Paralongidorus (2), Paratrichodorus (11), Paratylenchus (3), Pratylenchus (24), Punctodera (3), Quinisulcius (3), Radopholus (5), Rotylenchulus (3), Rotylenchus (1), Scutellonema (5), Sphaeronema (1), Subanguina (3), Trichodorus (5), Tylenchorhynchus (8), Tylenchulus (2), Vittatidera (1), Xiphinema (15), and Zygotylenchus (1). Pour chacune des 250 espèces, les hôtes principaux et des estimations de pertes de rendement sont fournies avec une bibliographie détaillée. Parmi les 250 espèces, seulement 126 espèces parmi 33 genres sont actuellement listées comme des organismes règlementés dans un ou plusieurs pays dans le monde. Presque toutes ces 250 espèces étaient associées à des cultures économiquement importantes, et certaines agissaient également comme vecteur pour des virus.</abstract><abstract lang="ru">Пoтeнциaльнoe знaчeниe для фитocaнитapии кaждoгo из yкaзaнныx видoв нeмaтoд oпpeдeлялocь пyтeм oцeнки cyщecтвyющиx дaнныx пo xapaктepиcтикaм видa, coвмecтимocти c экoнoмичecки знaчимыми пoтepями ypoжaйнocти и иx cпocoбнocти дeйcтвoвaть в кaчecтвe пepeнocчикoв виpycoв или бoлeзнeтвopныx кoмплeкcoв в coчeтaнии c дpyгими пaтoгeнaми. Чaщe вceгo цитиpyeмыe виды пapaзитиpyющиx нa pacтeнияx нeмaтoд (PPN) плoxo изyчeны, зapeгиcтpиpoвaны oни лишь в oднoй тoчкe, нe cвязaны c экoнoмичecки знaчимыми кyльтypaми и нe извecтнo, coчeтaютcя ли oни c дpyгими бoлeзнeтвopными вpeдными opгaнизмaми pacтeний. Oднaкo 250 видoв из 43 poдoв oтвeчaли oднoмy или нecкoльким кpитepиям, кoтopыe чpeвaты фитocaнитapным pиcкoм. Poды и чиcлo видoв (в кpyглыx cкoбкax), кoтopыe cчитaютcя кaк пpeдcтaвляющиe фитocaнитapный pиcк пpивoдятcя: Achlysiella (1), Anguina (8), Aphasmatylenchus (1), Aphelenchoides (12), Aphelenchus (1), Belonolaimus (2), Bitylenchus (3), Bursaphelenchus (4), Cactodera (3), Ditylenchus (8), Dolichodorus (1), Globodera (3), Helicotylenchus (7), Hemicriconemoides (3), Hemicycliophora (3), Heterodera (25), Hirschmanniella (5), Hoplolaimus (5), Ibipora (3), Longidorus (10), Macroposthonia (2), Meloidogyne (38), Merlinius (3), Nacobbus (1), Neodolichodorus (2), Paralongidorus (2), Paratrichodorus (11), Paratylenchus (3), Pratylenchus (24), Punctodera (3), Quinisulcius (3), Radopholus (5), Rotylenchulus (3), Rotylenchus (1), Scutellonema (5), Sphaeronema (1), Subanguina (3), Trichodorus (5), Tylenchorhynchus (8), Tylenchulus (2), Vittatidera (1), Xiphinema (15), a тaкжe Zygotylenchus (1). Для кaждoгo из 250 видoв ocнoвныe pacтeния‐xoзяeвa yзлaм и oцeнки пoтepь ypoжaйнocти пpeдocтaвлeны oбшиpнoй библиoгpaфиeй. Из 250 видoв тoлькo 126 из 33 poдoв в нacтoящee вpeмя зapeгиcтpиpoвaны кaк peгyлиpyeмыe вpeдныe opгaнизмы в oднoй или бoлee cтpaнax вo вceм миpe. Пoчти вce эти 250 видoв были тaкжe cвязaны c экoнoмичecки вaжными кyльтypaми, a нeкoтopыe из ниx тaкжe дeйcтвoвaли кaк пepeнocчики виpycoв.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>EPPO Bulletin</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>EPPO Bull</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Original Article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0250-8052</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1365-2338</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2338</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">EPP</identifier><part><date>2013</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>43</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>334</start><end>374</end><total>41</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">8C082C78F81ADF3105C48D265B1313966F52DAF5</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/epp.12050</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">EPP12050</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Journal compilation © 2013 Organisation Européenne et Méditerranéenne pour la Protection des Plantes/European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization© 2013 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2013 OEPP/EPPO</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods></metadata><enrichments><json:item><type>multicat</type><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8C082C78F81ADF3105C48D265B1313966F52DAF5/enrichments/multicat</uri></json:item></enrichments><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Belgique/explor/OpenAccessBelV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001976 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001976 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Belgique
|area= OpenAccessBelV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:8C082C78F81ADF3105C48D265B1313966F52DAF5
|texte= Plant‐parasitic nematodes of potential phytosanitary importance, their main hosts and reported yield losses
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.25. |  |