The Working Class and Welfare: Francis G. Castles on the Political Development of the Welfare State in Australia and New Zealand Thirty Years On
Identifieur interne : 001587 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001586; suivant : 001588The Working Class and Welfare: Francis G. Castles on the Political Development of the Welfare State in Australia and New Zealand Thirty Years On
Auteurs : Christopher DeemingSource :
- Social Policy & Administration [ 0144-5596 ] ; 2013-12.
Abstract
In his celebrated work of comparative policy, Francis Castles argued that a radical wage‐earning model of welfare had evolved in Australia and New Zealand over the course of the 20th century. The Castles' thesis is shown to have two parts: first, the ‘fourth world of welfare’ argument that rests upon protection of workers; and, second, an emphasis on the path‐dependent nature of social policy. It is perfectly possible to accept the second premise of the argument without the first, and indeed many do so. It is also possible to accept the importance of wage level protection concerns in Australasian social policy without accepting the complete fourth world thesis. This article explores the path of social democracy in Australia and New Zealand and the continuing importance of labour market regulation, as well as considering the extent to which that emphasis still makes Australasian social policy distinctive in the modern age. The argument focuses on the data and policies relating to labour market protection and wages, as well the systems of welfare and social protection, and the comparative information on poverty and inequality.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/spol.12037
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:BE2AE55A98870851835FEABB03B6F85FB141EFC4Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The Working Class and Welfare: Francis G. Castles on the Political Development of the Welfare State in Australia and New Zealand Thirty Years On</title><author><name sortKey="Deeming, Christopher" sort="Deeming, Christopher" uniqKey="Deeming C" first="Christopher" last="Deeming">Christopher Deeming</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: Chris.Deeming@bristol.ac.uk</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:BE2AE55A98870851835FEABB03B6F85FB141EFC4</idno><date when="2013" year="2013">2013</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/spol.12037</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/BE2AE55A98870851835FEABB03B6F85FB141EFC4/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001587</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The Working Class and Welfare: Francis G. Castles on the Political Development of the Welfare State in Australia and New Zealand Thirty Years On</title><author><name sortKey="Deeming, Christopher" sort="Deeming, Christopher" uniqKey="Deeming C" first="Christopher" last="Deeming">Christopher Deeming</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: Chris.Deeming@bristol.ac.uk</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Social Policy & Administration</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Social Policy & Administration</title><idno type="ISSN">0144-5596</idno><idno type="eISSN">1467-9515</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><date type="published" when="2013-12">2013-12</date><biblScope unit="volume">47</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="668">668</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="691">691</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0144-5596</idno></series><idno type="istex">BE2AE55A98870851835FEABB03B6F85FB141EFC4</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/spol.12037</idno><idno type="ArticleID">SPOL12037</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0144-5596</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">In his celebrated work of comparative policy, Francis Castles argued that a radical wage‐earning model of welfare had evolved in Australia and New Zealand over the course of the 20th century. The Castles' thesis is shown to have two parts: first, the ‘fourth world of welfare’ argument that rests upon protection of workers; and, second, an emphasis on the path‐dependent nature of social policy. It is perfectly possible to accept the second premise of the argument without the first, and indeed many do so. It is also possible to accept the importance of wage level protection concerns in Australasian social policy without accepting the complete fourth world thesis. This article explores the path of social democracy in Australia and New Zealand and the continuing importance of labour market regulation, as well as considering the extent to which that emphasis still makes Australasian social policy distinctive in the modern age. The argument focuses on the data and policies relating to labour market protection and wages, as well the systems of welfare and social protection, and the comparative information on poverty and inequality.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Christopher Deeming</name><affiliations><json:string>Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK</json:string><json:string>E-mail: Chris.Deeming@bristol.ac.uk</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Social class</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Social democracy</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Welfare state analysis</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Australia</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>New Zealand</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>SPOL12037</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>In his celebrated work of comparative policy, Francis Castles argued that a radical wage‐earning model of welfare had evolved in Australia and New Zealand over the course of the 20th century. The Castles' thesis is shown to have two parts: first, the ‘fourth world of welfare’ argument that rests upon protection of workers; and, second, an emphasis on the path‐dependent nature of social policy. It is perfectly possible to accept the second premise of the argument without the first, and indeed many do so. It is also possible to accept the importance of wage level protection concerns in Australasian social policy without accepting the complete fourth world thesis. This article explores the path of social democracy in Australia and New Zealand and the continuing importance of labour market regulation, as well as considering the extent to which that emphasis still makes Australasian social policy distinctive in the modern age. The argument focuses on the data and policies relating to labour market protection and wages, as well the systems of welfare and social protection, and the comparative information on poverty and inequality.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.172</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>430.866 x 649.134 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><keywordCount>5</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>1142</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>8919</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>54848</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>24</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>181</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>The Working Class and Welfare: Francis G. Castles on the Political Development of the Welfare State in Australia and New Zealand Thirty Years On</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>47</volume><publisherId><json:string>SPOL</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>23</total><last>691</last><first>668</first></pages><issn><json:string>0144-5596</json:string></issn><issue>6</issue><subject><json:item><value>Original Article</value></json:item></subject><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1467-9515</json:string></eissn><title>Social Policy & Administration</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1467-9515</json:string></doi></host><publicationDate>2013</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2013</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/spol.12037</json:string></doi><id>BE2AE55A98870851835FEABB03B6F85FB141EFC4</id><score>0.22336799</score><fulltext><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><extension>pdf</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/BE2AE55A98870851835FEABB03B6F85FB141EFC4/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><extension>zip</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/BE2AE55A98870851835FEABB03B6F85FB141EFC4/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/BE2AE55A98870851835FEABB03B6F85FB141EFC4/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The Working Class and Welfare: Francis G. Castles on the Political Development of the Welfare State in Australia and New Zealand Thirty Years On</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><availability status="free"><p>Open Access</p></availability><date>2013-07-16</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note>UK's Economic and Social Research Council - No. ES/K001353/1;</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The Working Class and Welfare: Francis G. Castles on the Political Development of the Welfare State in Australia and New Zealand Thirty Years On</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Christopher</forename><surname>Deeming</surname></persName><email>Chris.Deeming@bristol.ac.uk</email><affiliation>Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Social Policy & Administration</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Social Policy & Administration</title><idno type="pISSN">0144-5596</idno><idno type="eISSN">1467-9515</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-9515</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><date type="published" when="2013-12"></date><biblScope unit="volume">47</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="668">668</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="691">691</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">BE2AE55A98870851835FEABB03B6F85FB141EFC4</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/spol.12037</idno><idno type="ArticleID">SPOL12037</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2013-07-16</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract><p>In his celebrated work of comparative policy, Francis Castles argued that a radical wage‐earning model of welfare had evolved in Australia and New Zealand over the course of the 20th century. The Castles' thesis is shown to have two parts: first, the ‘fourth world of welfare’ argument that rests upon protection of workers; and, second, an emphasis on the path‐dependent nature of social policy. It is perfectly possible to accept the second premise of the argument without the first, and indeed many do so. It is also possible to accept the importance of wage level protection concerns in Australasian social policy without accepting the complete fourth world thesis. This article explores the path of social democracy in Australia and New Zealand and the continuing importance of labour market regulation, as well as considering the extent to which that emphasis still makes Australasian social policy distinctive in the modern age. The argument focuses on the data and policies relating to labour market protection and wages, as well the systems of welfare and social protection, and the comparative information on poverty and inequality.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>keywords</head><item><term>Social class</term></item><item><term>Social democracy</term></item><item><term>Welfare state analysis</term></item><item><term>Australia</term></item><item><term>New Zealand</term></item></list></keywords></textClass><textClass><keywords scheme="Journal Subject"><list><head>article-category</head><item><term>Original Article</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2013-07-16">Created</change><change when="2013-12">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><extension>txt</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/BE2AE55A98870851835FEABB03B6F85FB141EFC4/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body" wicri:toSee="Element #text"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component type="serialArticle" version="2.0" xml:id="spol12037" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-9515</doi><issn type="print">0144-5596</issn><issn type="electronic">1467-9515</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="SPOL"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title sort="SOCIAL POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION" type="main">Social Policy & Administration</title><title type="short">Social Policy & Administration</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="12106"><doi>10.1111/spol.2013.47.issue-6</doi><titleGroup><title type="main">Regional Issue: Social Policy Developments in Australia and New Zealand</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</copyright><numberingGroup><numbering number="47" type="journalVolume">47</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">6</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2013-12">December 2013</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" position="40" status="forIssue" type="article" accessType="open"><doi>10.1111/spol.12037</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="SPOL12037"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count number="23" type="pageTotal"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title><title type="articleCategory">Original Article</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">© 2013 The Author. Social Policy & Administration published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</copyright><legalStatement type="creativeCommonsBy"><p>This is an open access article under the terms of the <url href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">Creative Commons Attribution</url> License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</p></legalStatement><eventGroup><event agent="bestset" date="2013-07-16" type="xmlCreated"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2013-10-07"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2013-10-07"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-02-08"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.6.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-10-04"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">668</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">691</numbering></numberingGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:SPOL.SPOL12037.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><titleGroup><title type="main">The Working Class and Welfare: <fc>F</fc>rancis <fc>G</fc>. <fc>C</fc>astles on the Political Development of the Welfare State in <fc>A</fc>ustralia and <fc>N</fc>ew <fc>Z</fc>ealand Thirty Years On</title></titleGroup><creators><creator affiliationRef="#spol12037-aff-0001" creatorRole="author" xml:id="spol12037-cr-0001"><personName><givenNames>Christopher</givenNames><familyName>Deeming</familyName></personName><contactDetails><email>Chris.Deeming@bristol.ac.uk</email></contactDetails></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation countryCode="GB" xml:id="spol12037-aff-0001"><orgDiv>Geographical Sciences</orgDiv><orgName>University of Bristol</orgName><address><city>Bristol</city><country>UK</country></address></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup type="author"><keyword xml:id="spol12037-kwd-0001">Social class</keyword><keyword xml:id="spol12037-kwd-0002">Social democracy</keyword><keyword xml:id="spol12037-kwd-0003">Welfare state analysis</keyword><keyword xml:id="spol12037-kwd-0004"><fc>A</fc>ustralia</keyword><keyword xml:id="spol12037-kwd-0005"><fc>N</fc>ew <fc>Z</fc>ealand</keyword></keywordGroup><fundingInfo><fundingAgency>UK's Economic and Social Research Council</fundingAgency><fundingNumber>ES/K001353/1</fundingNumber></fundingInfo><abstractGroup><abstract type="main"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p>In his celebrated work of comparative policy, Francis Castles argued that a radical wage‐earning model of welfare had evolved in <fc>A</fc>ustralia and <fc>N</fc>ew <fc>Z</fc>ealand over the course of the 20th century. The <fc>C</fc>astles' thesis is shown to have two parts: first, the ‘fourth world of welfare’ argument that rests upon protection of workers; and, second, an emphasis on the path‐dependent nature of social policy. It is perfectly possible to accept the second premise of the argument without the first, and indeed many do so. It is also possible to accept the importance of wage level protection concerns in <fc>A</fc>ustralasian social policy without accepting the complete fourth world thesis. This article explores the path of social democracy in <fc>A</fc>ustralia and <fc>N</fc>ew <fc>Z</fc>ealand and the continuing importance of labour market regulation, as well as considering the extent to which that emphasis still makes Australasian social policy distinctive in the modern age. The argument focuses on the data and policies relating to labour market protection and wages, as well the systems of welfare and social protection, and the comparative information on poverty and inequality<i>.</i></p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header> </component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>The Working Class and Welfare: Francis G. Castles on the Political Development of the Welfare State in Australia and New Zealand Thirty Years On</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>The Working Class and Welfare: Francis G. Castles on the Political Development of the Welfare State in Australia and New Zealand Thirty Years On</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Christopher</namePart><namePart type="family">Deeming</namePart><affiliation>Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: Chris.Deeming@bristol.ac.uk</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2013-12</dateIssued><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2013-07-16</dateCreated><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2013</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract>In his celebrated work of comparative policy, Francis Castles argued that a radical wage‐earning model of welfare had evolved in Australia and New Zealand over the course of the 20th century. The Castles' thesis is shown to have two parts: first, the ‘fourth world of welfare’ argument that rests upon protection of workers; and, second, an emphasis on the path‐dependent nature of social policy. It is perfectly possible to accept the second premise of the argument without the first, and indeed many do so. It is also possible to accept the importance of wage level protection concerns in Australasian social policy without accepting the complete fourth world thesis. This article explores the path of social democracy in Australia and New Zealand and the continuing importance of labour market regulation, as well as considering the extent to which that emphasis still makes Australasian social policy distinctive in the modern age. The argument focuses on the data and policies relating to labour market protection and wages, as well the systems of welfare and social protection, and the comparative information on poverty and inequality.</abstract><note type="funding">UK's Economic and Social Research Council - No. ES/K001353/1; </note><subject><genre>keywords</genre><topic>Social class</topic><topic>Social democracy</topic><topic>Welfare state analysis</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>New Zealand</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Social Policy & Administration</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Social Policy & Administration</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Original Article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0144-5596</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1467-9515</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-9515</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">SPOL</identifier><part><date>2013</date><detail type="title"><title>Regional Issue: Social Policy Developments in Australia and New Zealand</title></detail><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>47</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>6</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>668</start><end>691</end><total>23</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">BE2AE55A98870851835FEABB03B6F85FB141EFC4</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/spol.12037</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">SPOL12037</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="creativeCommonsBy">This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods></metadata><enrichments><json:item><type>multicat</type><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/BE2AE55A98870851835FEABB03B6F85FB141EFC4/enrichments/multicat</uri></json:item></enrichments><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Belgique/explor/OpenAccessBelV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001587 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001587 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Belgique
|area= OpenAccessBelV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:BE2AE55A98870851835FEABB03B6F85FB141EFC4
|texte= The Working Class and Welfare: Francis G. Castles on the Political Development of the Welfare State in Australia and New Zealand Thirty Years On
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.25. |  |