OpenAccessBelV2, Istex, Corpus, bibRecord, 000122

Interlending and document supply a review of the recent literature XLVII

Identifieur interne : 000122 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000121; suivant : 000123

Interlending and document supply a review of the recent literature XLVII

Source :

Interlending & Document Supply [ 0264-1615 ] ; 2003-12-01.

RBID : ISTEX:67820F440273B4085BB7F460CDF9CB38CD110C2A

Abstract

Reviews more than 100 journals and some electronic lists and newsletters for issues and matters relevant to interlending and document supply. In particular, in this review, site licences, distance learning, providers of document supply, pricing, copyright, publishers, usage and open access are examined.

Url:

https://api.istex.fr/document/67820F440273B4085BB7F460CDF9CB38CD110C2A/fulltext/pdf

DOI: 10.1108/02641610310507004

Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:67820F440273B4085BB7F460CDF9CB38CD110C2A

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Interlending and document supply a review of the recent literature XLVII</title>
<author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Mcgrath, Mike" sort="Mcgrath, Mike" uniqKey="Mcgrath M" first="Mike" last="Mcgrath">Mike Mcgrath</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Editor of Interlending & Document Supply and is retired after 32 years at the British Library</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:67820F440273B4085BB7F460CDF9CB38CD110C2A</idno>
<date when="2003" year="2003">2003</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1108/02641610310507004</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/67820F440273B4085BB7F460CDF9CB38CD110C2A/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000122</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Interlending and document supply a review of the recent literature XLVII</title>
<author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Mcgrath, Mike" sort="Mcgrath, Mike" uniqKey="Mcgrath M" first="Mike" last="Mcgrath">Mike Mcgrath</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Editor of Interlending & Document Supply and is retired after 32 years at the British Library</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j">Interlending & Document Supply</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0264-1615</idno>
<imprint><publisher>MCB UP Ltd</publisher>
<date type="published" when="2003-12-01">2003-12-01</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">31</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="270">270</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="279">279</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0264-1615</idno>
</series>
<idno type="istex">67820F440273B4085BB7F460CDF9CB38CD110C2A</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1108/02641610310507004</idno>
<idno type="filenameID">1220310407</idno>
<idno type="original-pdf">1220310407.pdf</idno>
<idno type="href">02641610310507004.pdf</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0264-1615</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass></textClass>
<langUsage><language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Reviews more than 100 journals and some electronic lists and newsletters for issues and matters relevant to interlending and document supply. In particular, in this review, site licences, distance learning, providers of document supply, pricing, copyright, publishers, usage and open access are examined.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<istex><corpusName>emerald</corpusName>
<author><json:item><name>Mike McGrath</name>
<affiliations><json:string>Editor of Interlending & Document Supply and is retired after 32 years at the British Library</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
</author>
<subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>Document delivery</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>Interlibrary loan</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>Copyright law</value>
</json:item>
</subject>
<language><json:string>eng</json:string>
</language>
<originalGenre><json:string>e-literature-review</json:string>
</originalGenre>
<abstract>Reviews more than 100 journals and some electronic lists and newsletters for issues and matters relevant to interlending and document supply. In particular, in this review, site licences, distance learning, providers of document supply, pricing, copyright, publishers, usage and open access are examined.</abstract>
<qualityIndicators><score>5.516</score>
<pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion>
<pdfPageSize>595 x 842 pts (A4)</pdfPageSize>
<refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative>
<keywordCount>3</keywordCount>
<abstractCharCount>304</abstractCharCount>
<pdfWordCount>5672</pdfWordCount>
<pdfCharCount>35865</pdfCharCount>
<pdfPageCount>10</pdfPageCount>
<abstractWordCount>43</abstractWordCount>
</qualityIndicators>
<title>Interlending and document supply a review of the recent literature XLVII</title>
<genre><json:string>other</json:string>
</genre>
<host><volume>31</volume>
<publisherId><json:string>ilds</json:string>
</publisherId>
<pages><last>279</last>
<first>270</first>
</pages>
<issn><json:string>0264-1615</json:string>
</issn>
<issue>4</issue>
<subject><json:item><value>Library & information science</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><value>Collection building & management</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><value>Library & information services</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><value>Consortia</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><value>Stock revision</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><value>Document delivery</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><value>Lending</value>
</json:item>
</subject>
<genre><json:string>journal</json:string>
</genre>
<language><json:string>unknown</json:string>
</language>
<title>Interlending & Document Supply</title>
<doi><json:string>10.1108/ilds</json:string>
</doi>
</host>
<publicationDate>2003</publicationDate>
<copyrightDate>2003</copyrightDate>
<doi><json:string>10.1108/02641610310507004</json:string>
</doi>
<id>67820F440273B4085BB7F460CDF9CB38CD110C2A</id>
<score>0.38150585</score>
<fulltext><json:item><original>true</original>
<mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype>
<extension>pdf</extension>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/67820F440273B4085BB7F460CDF9CB38CD110C2A/fulltext/pdf</uri>
</json:item>
<json:item><original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/zip</mimetype>
<extension>zip</extension>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/67820F440273B4085BB7F460CDF9CB38CD110C2A/fulltext/zip</uri>
</json:item>
<istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/67820F440273B4085BB7F460CDF9CB38CD110C2A/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Interlending and document supply a review of the recent literature XLVII</title>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority>
<publisher>MCB UP Ltd</publisher>
<availability><p>© MCB UP Limited</p>
</availability>
<date>2003</date>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Interlending and document supply a review of the recent literature XLVII</title>
<author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Mike</forename>
<surname>McGrath</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Editor of Interlending & Document Supply and is retired after 32 years at the British Library</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr><title level="j">Interlending & Document Supply</title>
<idno type="pISSN">0264-1615</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1108/ilds</idno>
<imprint><publisher>MCB UP Ltd</publisher>
<date type="published" when="2003-12-01"></date>
<biblScope unit="volume">31</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="270">270</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="279">279</biblScope>
</imprint>
</monogr>
<idno type="istex">67820F440273B4085BB7F460CDF9CB38CD110C2A</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1108/02641610310507004</idno>
<idno type="filenameID">1220310407</idno>
<idno type="original-pdf">1220310407.pdf</idno>
<idno type="href">02641610310507004.pdf</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><creation><date>2003</date>
</creation>
<langUsage><language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
<abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Reviews more than 100 journals and some electronic lists and newsletters for issues and matters relevant to interlending and document supply. In particular, in this review, site licences, distance learning, providers of document supply, pricing, copyright, publishers, usage and open access are examined.</p>
</abstract>
<textClass><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>keywords</head>
<item><term>Document delivery</term>
</item>
<item><term>Interlibrary loan</term>
</item>
<item><term>Copyright law</term>
</item>
</list>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<textClass><keywords scheme="Emerald Subject Group"><list><label>cat-LISC</label>
<item><term>Library & information science</term>
</item>
<label>cat-CBM</label>
<item><term>Collection building & management</term>
</item>
<label>cat-LISE</label>
<item><term>Library & information services</term>
</item>
<label>cat-CONS</label>
<item><term>Consortia</term>
</item>
<label>cat-SREV</label>
<item><term>Stock revision</term>
</item>
<label>cat-DOCD</label>
<item><term>Document delivery</term>
</item>
<label>cat-LDG</label>
<item><term>Lending</term>
</item>
</list>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
<revisionDesc><change when="2003-12-01">Published</change>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
</istex:fulltextTEI>
<json:item><original>false</original>
<mimetype>text/plain</mimetype>
<extension>txt</extension>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/67820F440273B4085BB7F460CDF9CB38CD110C2A/fulltext/txt</uri>
</json:item>
</fulltext>
<metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="corpus emerald not found" wicri:toSee="no header"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration>
<istex:document><!-- Auto generated NISO JATS XML created by Atypon out of MCB DTD source files. Do Not Edit! --><article dtd-version="1.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="e-literature-review"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ilds</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="doi">10.1108/ilds</journal-id>
<journal-title-group><journal-title>Interlending & Document Supply</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">0264-1615</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>MCB UP Ltd</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1108/02641610310507004</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="original-pdf">1220310407.pdf</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="filename">1220310407</article-id>
<article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="type-of-publication"><compound-subject><compound-subject-part content-type="code">e-literature-review</compound-subject-part>
<compound-subject-part content-type="label">Literature review</compound-subject-part>
</compound-subject>
</subj-group>
<subj-group subj-group-type="subject"><compound-subject><compound-subject-part content-type="code">cat-LISC</compound-subject-part>
<compound-subject-part content-type="label">Library & information science</compound-subject-part>
</compound-subject>
<subj-group><compound-subject><compound-subject-part content-type="code">cat-CBM</compound-subject-part>
<compound-subject-part content-type="label">Collection building & management</compound-subject-part>
</compound-subject>
<subj-group><compound-subject><compound-subject-part content-type="code">cat-CONS</compound-subject-part>
<compound-subject-part content-type="label">Consortia</compound-subject-part>
</compound-subject>
<compound-subject><compound-subject-part content-type="code">cat-SREV</compound-subject-part>
<compound-subject-part content-type="label">Stock revision</compound-subject-part>
</compound-subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
<subj-group><compound-subject><compound-subject-part content-type="code">cat-LISE</compound-subject-part>
<compound-subject-part content-type="label">Library & information services</compound-subject-part>
</compound-subject>
<subj-group><compound-subject><compound-subject-part content-type="code">cat-DOCD</compound-subject-part>
<compound-subject-part content-type="label">Document delivery</compound-subject-part>
</compound-subject>
<compound-subject><compound-subject-part content-type="code">cat-LDG</compound-subject-part>
<compound-subject-part content-type="label">Lending</compound-subject-part>
</compound-subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group><article-title>Interlending and document supply: a review of the recent literature – XLVII</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><string-name><given-names>Mike</given-names>
 <surname>McGrath</surname>
</string-name>
<aff>Editor of <italic>Interlending & Document Supply</italic>
 and is retired after 32 years at the British Library</aff>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub"><day>01</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2003</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>31</volume>
<issue>4</issue>
<fpage>270</fpage>
<lpage>279</lpage>
<permissions><copyright-statement>© MCB UP Limited</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2003</copyright-year>
<license license-type="publisher"><license-p></license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="02641610310507004.pdf"></self-uri>
<abstract><p>Reviews more than 100 journals and some electronic lists and newsletters for issues and matters relevant to interlending and document supply. In particular, in this review, site licences, distance learning, providers of document supply, pricing, copyright, publishers, usage and open access are examined.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group><kwd>Document delivery</kwd>
<x>, </x>
<kwd>Interlibrary loan</kwd>
<x>, </x>
<kwd>Copyright law</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>peer-reviewed</meta-name>
<meta-value>no</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
<custom-meta><meta-name>academic-content</meta-name>
<meta-value>yes</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
<custom-meta><meta-name>rightslink</meta-name>
<meta-value>included</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-group>
</article-meta>
<ack><p>The author wishes to express many thanks to the British Library Document Supply Centre for permission to access the journals scanned for this review.</p>
</ack>
</front>
<body><sec><title>Introduction</title>
<p>Regular readers of this review will know that it derives from scanning over 100 LIS journals that are purchased by the British Library Document Supply Centre at Boston Spa. On my recent visit to compile this review I was confronted by the impressive fruits of the British Library's (BL) investment in new technology. For the last 25 years, rows of large photocopiers have been operated, mainly by women, standing at the machines for up to eight hours a day. Clanking and whirring, they have churned out millions of single‐sided and oversized photocopies of journal articles, etc. These have been replaced by workstations' large and elegant flat screens that scan printed journals and send the image to the post room where they are printed two‐sided on A4 paper and posted to customers. This pleases long‐suffering end‐users who have had to cope for years with filing the oversized photocopies and it also saves a lot of trees. Elsewhere on the floors, machines transmit directly and electronically an ever‐growing number of documents to customers. These are from publisher databases where the BL has the appropriate permission. And even more trees are saved, at least at Boston Spa, although users will print out many of the documents.</p>
<p>However, this particular end user now finds great difficulty in finding a conventional photocopier for his own humble needs. Such is the price of progress.</p>
<p>This quarter the literature review covers consortial site licences or big deals, distance learning, the document supply debate, providers of document supply, e‐journals, pricing, copyright, publishers, usage and open access.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Site licences</title>
<p>A weighty and valuable paper from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b28">Nicholas <italic>et al.</italic>
 (2003)</xref>
 “evaluates through deep log analysis, the impact of ‘Big Deal’ agreements on the online searching behaviour of users of the Emerald digital library Web site”. The main conclusion was that users behaved differently in an electronic environment and exhibited “strong consumer traits”. The authors refer to the contradictory results emanating from OhioLink that “some of the most used journals are not those that the libraries originally subscribed to in print form”. They go on to observe that this “may put a question mark over journal selection policies – and the role of the intermediary, too”. These are dangerous and controversial waters and the OhioLink research must be treated with great caution as they themselves point out. However their own research described is excellent and comes up with fascinating results. It was conducted with the use logs for Emerald journals for the month of June 2002. Some of the conclusions from the analysis are: “Deal subscribers made up 35 per cent of users and accounted for … 57 per cent of use”; “Nearly nine in ten users visited the site just once in the survey. Approximately 10 per cent of users visited between two and five times and half a percent visited six or more times”; “32 per cent of Deal subscribers made 11 or more requests in an average session” compared to 30 per cent of non‐Deal subscribers. A surprisingly small difference given the access of Deal subscribers to a greater number of journals. “On average, non‐Deal organisations viewed about five different journals and on average requested about 12 articles. While those organisations subscribing to the Big Deal viewed approximately 46 different journals and requested about 93 articles”. As the authors comment – “Quite a difference”! They point to the deeply misleading conclusions that can be drawn from IP analysis for geographical spread. “Almost half of use came via USA IP addresses and 20 per cent via UK ones”. But actual geographic locations were “less than 10 per cent of use from the USA and 40 per cent from the UK”. Whilst this work does not make direct links to document supply (DS) issues, it indirectly substantiates the link between the success of Big Deals and the decline of DS. At least some of the increased usage by Big Dealers would have likely resulted in DS. I look forward to seeing the results of the next two stages which will link this quantitative work to qualitative research with users. An attack on the Big Deals arguing that they are “strengthening publisher's power” comes from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b11">Di Majo (2002)</xref>
. She argues strongly for support for the various alternatives being offered from SPARC to PubMed for “free” access to research material. The intrepid Fred Friend enters the fray once again (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b13">Friend, 2003</xref>
). He argues that “the so called ‘Big Deal’ – is bad for small publishers and for large libraries even if – in the short term – good for large publishers and for small libraries”. He concludes that alternative purchasing models need to be found. He makes the apposite point that “The richness of library holdings depends upon the acquisition of a wide variety of titles. Consortial deals are threatening to remove much of that richness, leading to “identikit” holdings as libraries offer the same titles to their users”. And of direct relevance to DS practitioners he suggests that it would be better if, “deals were offered which combined some subscriptions with some electronic document delivery”. Continuing the critical view of Big Deals, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b38">Van Orsdel and Born (2003)</xref>
 use the <italic>43rd Annual Report of the Periodicals Price Survey</italic>
 to castigate publishers for high prices but also for a package that “obscures journal prices and reduces competition among individual titles from different publishers”. They identify some of the current reactions to this well known situation – “Organic Letters, a SPARC alternative to Tetrahedron Letters, bested its competitor in the 2001 ISI impact factors. The alternative title costs one third as much …”. They also describe BioMed Central's work and the new DSpace initiative from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. That such a strong attack should take place in the wide‐circulation <italic>Library Journal</italic>
 must be of concern to publishers. Especially as Van Orsdel is Dean of Libraries at Eastern Kentucky University and Born is Director of the Academic Division of EBSCO. Finally, the ever‐thoughtful Mark Rowse, CEO of Ingenta PLC (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b31">Rowse, 2003</xref>
) summarises the results of three research studies sponsored by the Ingenta Institute. (This research was also delivered at a conference in September 2002 which was reported on in <italic>ILDS</italic>
, Vol. 31 No. 1.) He concludes that the consortial site licence model, “is unlikely to continue in its current form, with significant adaptation and development anticipated at the next round of consortial license renewal”. He states the problem clearly – “The all encompassing nature of the Big Deal means a library may be burdened with titles that have little relevance to its users, or which are of low quality, with reduced funds left over for the purchase of additional subscriptions from smaller or society publishers”. The research included that by Don King which analysed data from 15,000 surveys of US scientists and consortia questionnaires. Key perspectives, a UK‐based research consultancy conducted research on the impact of consortium site licenses on libraries and publishers by interviewing key players and conducting focus groups. “Finally The Centre for Information Behaviour and Analysis of Research (CiBER) of the City University London” studied the issue from a user perspective using web logs from Emerald and Blackwells. This latter research is published in ASLIB Proceedings and is cited earlier in this section.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Pricing</title>
<p><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b38">Van Orsdel and Born (2003)</xref>
 were mentioned above in the context of the Big Deals. However their article also tabulated and analysed a wealth of historic and current price rises. In 2002‐2003 serial prices rose by 8 per cent in the USA, 6 per cent in Europe (The UK and The Netherlands being much the lowest), Asia 3 per cent and impoverished Africa an enormous 15 per cent. Price rises for 2004 are predicted to be an overall 12 per cent. If this proves to be true then some recovery in document supply volumes should take place as cash poor librarians search for cost effective alternatives to subscriptions. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b32"><italic>Scholarly Communication Report</italic>
 (2003)</xref>
 describes an article by Cox to be published in <italic>Serials Review</italic>
 which contrasts the “actual number of downloads for each of these two services [Institute of Physics Publishing and the ubiquitous Emerald] of 3 million each with ‘printed downloads’ (i.e. document delivery) for all serials on a global basis of at best 20 million”. We will have to await the article but it is difficult to believe that like is being compared with like. Surely the 3 million downloads include abstracts? Otherwise Emerald's 150 or so journals would be experiencing 20,000 article downloads each annually. He calculates that “the average price per use of the Emerald article was £3.43 and for IoPP was £2.88”. Figures from research at Drexel University found that “the operational cost of providing a single use of a journal article was as low as $0.45 for an electronic journal, $6.00 for current (unbound) issues and $30.00 for bound journals”. So mixed messages here for the document supply market. Further resistance to publisher pricing strategies is noted by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b6">Bury (2003)</xref>
. She describes the opposition to the merger of Kluwer and Bertlsmann Springer. The new owners, “UK venture capital partnership Candover and Cinven … are expected to set tough targets for profit margin …”. Nothing new there then. A further study of serial pricing carried out by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b34">Swets Blackwell (2003)</xref>
 shows that serial prices rose by between 6 and 7 per cent in 2002‐2003 with medicine declining by 3.66 per cent in the UK but rising by 11.42 per cent in Australia!</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Distance learning</title>
<p>The advantages of distance learning are many for both user and provider. The latter gains massive reductions in unit costs from on site teaching and technology is ensuring an adequate delivery quality of material. However document delivery is a difficult service to bolt on mainly for reasons of copyright and payment. The situation at the University of Nottingham is described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b23">Khan Quay Kin (2003)</xref>
 which has opened a campus in Malaysia. Document delivery is described – “In an attempt to reduce the cost of document delivery, we relied on the local universities in Malaysia, failing which we would resort to university libraries in Singapore or the British Library Document Supply Centre”. The University of Maryland University College “serves a large distant student population, with the proportion of students studying online approaching 50 per cent of enrolments”. “The findings of the survey of students described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b22">Kelly and Orr (2003)</xref>
 followed national trends and demonstrated that they favor the use of electronic resources (the internet in particular” “Sixty six per cent of respondents reported they ‘seldom’ or ‘never’ visited a library. The most useful service identified was access to “full text materials in the library's database”. Unfortunately although students were asked about the value of the document delivery service the result was not given in the paper. An optimistic overview of issues for document supply to distance learners from a USA perspective is given by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b14">Fuller (2002)</xref>
. He describes Ariel and Prospero as well as partnerships that are being formed in order to enhance the service.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>The document supply debate</title>
<p>The two contradictory trends at work in document supply are assessed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b40">Watts (2003)</xref>
. “On the one hand, some observers believe that we have entered the age of the ‘separates economy’ in which the unbundled article is the primary unit, which can be acquired among other means, via document delivery, interlibrary loan (ILL) and pay‐per‐view downloads. On the other hand, the advent of widespread consortial purchasing has taken us into the era of the ‘big deal’, which has increased the amount of content available to the individual library, and consequently reduced the need for document supply”. Her article explores this contradiction and provides an overview of current developments. Most of this will not be new to DS librarians but the section on linking facilities and openURLs maybe new to some. She concludes that “the distinction between document supply (involving one off payments for occasional use) and subscription based purchasing (involving advanced payment for uncapped access) is likely to blur … we shall see new pricing models emerge that take into account different types of use and levels of use”. Interesting times!</p>
<p>Well‐known publisher Robert Campbell returns to the fray in his journal of choice (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b7">Campbell, 2003</xref>
). He reprises the hostility of publishers to the high volume document supply operation at the British Library Document Supply Centre. However he now sees, “BLDSC and journal publishers, once sworn enemies, find[ing] themselves on the same side”. This is in response to Subito, the German document supplier, undercutting BLDSC. “While BLDSC pays royalties either to the CLA or directly to publishers who have signed license agreements with it, Subito charges around four euros per document and pays no royalties”. (See <italic>ILDS</italic>
 Vol 31.3 for an article by Uwe Rosemann on Subito. Since this article was published Subito has withdrawn its service from the UK and USA under pressure from publishers). Campbell identifies three threats to the future of document suppliers:<list list-type="order"><list-item><label>1. </label>
<p>“<italic>Journal legacy</italic>
” – the business of providing document supply from older journal issues will be eroded by publishers digitizing their back runs.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>2. </label>
<p>“<italic>Aggregated databases</italic>
” – agencies (such as Ebsco and ProQuest) license rights from primary publishers and assemble packages, enhanced by secondary services, that are readily available to students online. Pricing is kept down by “the publishers setting embargoes on access to any article for at least twelve months after publication”.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>3. </label>
<p>“<italic>The Open Archives initiative</italic>
” – a concept familiar to readers of the literature review. It can be combined with “institutional repositories” whereby “a library takes on the role of archiving material from its faculty and offers free access to the research community over the Web”.</p>
</list-item>
</list>
This combination “threatens not only the document delivery role of the British Library and other agencies, but is obviously a threat to the traditional publishing system”. A strange omission is that he doesn't mention consortial licencing of current content which is having a very significant impact on document supply. A vigorous debate in the USA on the rationale for ILL in public libraries is conducted by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b1">Amdursky <italic>et al.</italic>
 (2003)</xref>
. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b1">Amdursky <italic>et al.</italic>
 (2003)</xref>
 argue aggressively that “The public library community directs too many dollars to a service that has few users. There are better things to do with the money. They calculate that, “a [public] library serving 10,000‐24,999 people is spending nearly $150,000 per year on ILL”, by providing over 8,000 ILL requests a year. He argues for purchase rather that ILL that costs at least $18 compared to a circulation cost of between 75 cents and $1.25. The key weakness in his argument is that he doesn't take into account the total cost of acquiring books which is very high and that re‐use is low. However librarians in other countries may well be surprised at the high use of ILL in US public libraries – driven partly no doubt by the fact that it is free to the end user Unlike in this writer's public library where he must pay 50 pence for a book from the regional system and £3 for a book from Boston Spa! Hulsey addresses this last point by describing how his public library purchases articles on demand and out of print books via online sellers such as abebooks.com. The cost is between $10 and $15 which is certainly less that the cost of ILL. However he does not identify how they deal with new material which presumably accounts for much of demand. Brandau makes a spirited defence of ILL. “Statistics from projects around the nation show that patron initiated ILL through interconnected circulation systems can cost up to ten times less: as little as $3‐$5 (combined borrowing and lending) vs the old model of mediated ILL that costs $28 and up”. Its refreshing to read such a lively debate – North American librarians seem to be much better at this than the staider Europeans (including the British). However a lot more work needs to be done on consistent costings before that argument can be clarified between purchase and ILL. And the article demonstrates how much can be “proven” by selecting the right statistics! The debate on “just in time vs just in case” is revisited in a piece of this title in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b19">Houle and Beckett (2003)</xref>
. The conclusion from the workshop was summarised as “document supply is a viable alternative to journal subscription and inter library lending for an academic library”. A thorough overview of the issues raised by international document supply is given in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b33">Seal (2002)</xref>
 with particular emphasis on the needs of poorer countries and the responsibilities of the richer ones.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Document providers</title>
<p>Anyone interested in following the progress of the publisher‐based model being developed by Ingenta can read an interview with their new chief operating officer (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b10">Dessain, 2003</xref>
). Needless to say it is upbeat but he does describe the service provided in some detail and some of the current challenges. As the pressure on the document providers from the “Big Deals” grows so they seek out new markets. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b21">Ireland and Krym (2002)</xref>
 describe how CISTI, the Canadian document supplier “has taken up the challenge of supplying to libraries outside of North America”. They describe the history of CISTI and look at current developments including “almost round the clock document ordering and scanning to ensure that most documents (orders?) received are processed for delivery within 24 hours of receipt”. Their experience of international lending of returnables is interesting and is consistent with that of the BLDSC – there are very few losses. “Hydrophobia” caused by lending across water is a much exaggerated illness! The latest developments at CISTI are also described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b36">VanBusKirk and Krym (2003)</xref>
. The growing demand by end users for unmediated ordering is described as well as the future strategy outlined..</p>
<p>The BLDSC has been producing Inside, an integrated copyright fee paid document delivery service and current awareness database since 1993. This captures the Table of Contents for the most used 20,000 journals at Boston Spa as well as for the comprehensive conference proceedings collection.. A project was set up at the University of Houston to enhance the service to the Biology and Biochemistry faculty and is reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b3">Bracke and Gwamanda (2002)</xref>
. “Although the number of users is somewhat small, the service was heavily used, generating 315 requests or a mean of 22.5 requests per user”. “Overall the average cost per article was $29.60 excluding labor”. Copyright fees accounted for 45 per cent of the cost. The project concluded that “document delivery is a cost effective method of giving timely access to journal articles not in the library's collection …”. An ongoing service has been instituted and this is expected to expand soon to the Chemistry faculty. The concept of the one stop shop is much sought after by librarians in order to satisfy the varied needs of their customers cost effectively. Journal Finder is a solution developed in house at the University of North Carolina. It “seamlessly integrates electronic journal content, pay per view content, local printing holdings, unmediated document delivery (fully funded by the library) and interlibrary loan”. The system is described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b12">Felts (2002)</xref>
 and the response by users has been “almost unanimously positive”. The British Library has caused a lot of interest in its new “fully copyright compliant secure electronic delivery service” – lets hope that they soon think of a snappy name for it. With the addition of scanning technology “it will be able to supply virtually all of the materials listed in its catalogues – as well as from its Inside electronic table of contents service – via secure electronic delivery direct to the researcher's PC”. Many have picked up on this development but this report is taken from the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b5">British Library (2003)</xref>
. And finally in this section Subito, a supplier much in the news at present, is analysed carefully by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b17">Gorraiz and Schlögl (2003)</xref>
. A substantial proportion of article request were satisfied from a relatively small number of journals, 13 publishers accounted for 45 per cent of demand, only five publishers accounted for 31 per cent. Broadly speaking nearly 75 per cent of requests were for medicine and biology. For those readers who want to hear about Subito from the horse's mouth, the head of Subito describes developments at Subito in the context of document delivery in Germany (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b30">Rosemann, 2003</xref>
).</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Electronic journals and books</title>
<p>E journals are, of course, having an enormous impact on document supply and publishing generally; e‐books less so but the market is developing after a period of relative stagnation. For anyone new to the subject of e‐books and matters Canadian then a well researched piece on the use of e books in Quebec University by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b15">Gharbi and Deschatelets (2002)</xref>
 should be useful – if you can read French. Various services were assessed including Ebrary, Questia, netLibrary and Books 24×7. An excellent questionnaire went only to librarians; it would be interesting to see one addressed to the end user. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b25">Line (2003)</xref>
 gives a brief assessment of the role of e books in document supply. The environment for e journals from an Indian perspective is given in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b35">Thapa <italic>et al.</italic>
 (2002)</xref>
. The resistance to e journals is noted and that, “readers still prefer conventional prestigious journals”. The drawbacks of e journals are adumbrated – including price, digital preservation, copyright and archiving. An interesting article describes how the Royal College of Nursing is providing electronic resources to its 340,000 members “scattered across the United Kingdom” (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b26">Lord, 2003</xref>
). Access is offered to the British Nursing Index and to a number of full text journals. 25,000 members have registered for the service and new registrations are running at about 1000 a month. My former colleague Andrew Braid takes up his pen to describe the use of e‐journals in order to satisfy document supply requests (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b4">Braid, 2003</xref>
). The development of the Electronic Storage and Retrieval system (ESTAR) is outlined and its expansion in the last three years to include nearly 3,000 journals. The recent introduction of secure electronic document supply using Adobe Content Server and Acrobat eBook Reader system is described in some detail. Braid offers a vision of an electronic channel based on the BL's Inside. The user will access articles directly for which their library has a subscription and will receive material from the BL for the non subscribed material often instantaneously. “This becomes a one stop seamless service, combining the best of holdings and access, within an integrated system”.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Journal usage</title>
<p>A key issue for the future of document supply from journals is the measured usage in the new electronic environment. Two papers given at an IFLA satellite conference in August 2002 address this issue. The first being <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b24">Kidd (2002)</xref>
 which is very detailed. He states “It has always been very difficult to measure the use of print journals, at least in open access libraries, given that the majority journal use is not reflected in loan”. He identifies many of the issues associated with measurement in the electronic environment and describes the work of COUNTER (Counting Online Usage of NeTworked Electronic Resources). The second paper (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b2">Blixrud, 2002</xref>
) describes the research project funded by the Association of Research Libraries in the USA. Its purpose was “to develop measures for describing the resources, expenditures and usage of electronic resources”. It is good news that they intend to support the work of COUNTER. Another take on the measurement process is by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b9">De Groote and Dorsch (2003)</xref>
. Research was carried out at the Library of the Health Sciences – Peoria, part of the University of Illinois at Chicago. Its purpose was to “determine use of online biomedical journals and databases and to assess current user characteristics”. It concludes that “Users prefer online resources to print, and many choose to access these online resources remotely. Convenience and full text availability appear to play roles in selecting resources online resources”. The detailed questionnaire generated a wealth of useful data; for example the ubiquity of PCs but the low rate of use of databases other than Medline.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Document delivery issues</title>
<p>For those of you who would like to know more about Prospero, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b41">Weible and Robben (2002)</xref>
 describe the implementation of Prospero which “allows library users to collect their photocopy requests in a portable document format (PDF) on the Internet”. They conclude that “After a year of use at [the] University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Prospero has calmed the tempest of incoming Ariel documents by providing a quicker turnaround time and has supported a means for additional document delivery services on campus”. The document delivery environment in Belgium is described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b100">Van Borm and Corthouts (2003)</xref>
. The Belgian document ordering system IMPALA is described together with the three union catalogues – ANTILOPE, CCB and VLACC. The future for traditional ILL and document supply is seen by the authors as very limited but they remain optimistic.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Copyright</title>
<p>European librarians still await the full force of their national government's interpretation of and implementation of the EU Directive on Copyright. The current case of Subito referred to elsewhere underlines the importance of achieving a level playing field in the competitive field of document supply. Given the vagueness of the Directive this is going to be difficulty to achieve at the national level. One recent example is Belgium. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b37">Van onze correspondent (2003)</xref>
 comments that, “The conversion of the European Directive into Belgian law is still a long way off, and a healthy sense of suspicion is in order … The past months saw a great deal of doctoring and lobbying, but the water between the several parties was still too deep to come to an agreement”. The implementation in the UK has also been delayed yet again. ILDS will carry a piece in the next issue by when there may have been real progress – but don't hold your breath. From the USA comes a typically passionate argument in defence of copyright law and its enforcement by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b16">Givler (2003)</xref>
. Given the general hostility to copyright that is growing amongst librarians it is good to see a robust defence in print. Still in the States, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b29">Pike (2003)</xref>
 throws light on the working of the Copyright Clearance Centre. Interesting to note that they collect from “only” 10,000 publishers. A rare insight into copyright in India is given by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b8">Chatterjee <italic>et al.</italic>
 (2002)</xref>
. They conclude that “We need a more pragmatic approach towards proper implementation of these laws – (of the IT ACT 2000) – and a more liberal approach in interpreting the IPR and copyright related matters in the digital divide”. Sounds all very familiar.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Open access</title>
<p>The issue of free access to research articles has moved on from being a debate to there being real systems in place. (With apologies to Paul Ginsparg, whose High Energy Physics site has been in place for many years.) Three significant developments have taken place recently. First, significant investment has taken place. Second, journals have been launched in direct competition with their commercial counterparts. Third an economic model whereby the author pays a fee has been established. This appears to be working quite well; presumably because the author rarely has to pay from their own pocket. The literature has been full of developments over the past three months. A leading protagonist from BioMed Central poses the question “whether making money out of journal publishing, even if it is put to good use, is the best way of furthering the science and practice of a discipline” (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b39">Velterop, 2003</xref>
) – with perhaps an obvious if stimulating answer. In the same issue of the journal, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b27">Morris (2003)</xref>
 notes that “There is increasing pressure from academia to make the results of publicly funded research freely available to all”. She asks will the journal survive and will the publisher survive? She seems more confident of the survival of the first than of the second. although she identifies the features of value that are added by the publisher and that will need to be done by someone. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b18">Guédon (2003)</xref>
 has written a critical and substantial article on open access archives. He is sceptical of Stephen Harnad's proposal that authors mount an earlier pre print version of a published article on to an open access archive. He feels that “its jesuitic tonality may generate a smile plus some skepticism, one may also legitimately wonder how a court of law would actually react if faced by such a ploy”. Nonetheless he concludes that “the evolution of science has gradually led to an elitist plutocracy, but that open access archives could become part of the solution aiming at restoring what I like to call a ‘republic of science’” A very readable piece. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b20">Hyams (2003)</xref>
 provides a very useful overview of three recent conferences on open access archives. To pick just one fascinating nugget for her piece – the Web site of the <italic>British Medical Journal</italic>
 “is free and access to the electronic <italic>BMJ</italic>
 is open (print copies go to subscribers only). The increase in citations has made the <italic>BMJ</italic>
 the second most influential medical journal in the world … But its subscription sales have fallen – and hence its attractiveness to advertisers. It must now take hard decisions that will affect the funding not just of the journal and the web site but possibly the British Medical Association itself”.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back><ref-list><title>References</title>
<ref id="b1"><mixed-citation><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Amdursky</surname>
, <given-names>S.J.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
, <person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Hulsey</surname>
, <given-names>R.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 and <person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Brandau</surname>
, <given-names>C.P.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 (<year>2003</year>
), “<article-title><italic>ILL: sacred cow or vital service?</italic>
</article-title>
”, <source><italic>Library Journal</italic>
</source>
, <issue>1 June</issue>
, pp. <fpage>76</fpage>
<x>‐</x>
<lpage>9</lpage>
.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b2"><mixed-citation><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Blixrud</surname>
, <given-names>J.C.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 (<year>2002</year>
), “<article-title><italic>Measures for electronic use: the ARL E‐Metrics project</italic>
</article-title>
”, <source><italic>LISU Occasional Paper</italic>
</source>
, No. <issue>32</issue>
, pp. <fpage>73</fpage>
<x>‐</x>
<lpage>84</lpage>
.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b3"><mixed-citation><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Bracke</surname>
, <given-names>M.S.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 and <person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Gwamanda</surname>
, <given-names>D.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 (<year>2002</year>
), “<article-title><italic>Mediated document delivery using the British Library's Inside</italic>
</article-title>
”, <source><italic>Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Information Supply</italic>
</source>
, Vol. <volume>12</volume>
 No. <issue>4</issue>
, pp. <fpage>5</fpage>
<x>‐</x>
<lpage>13</lpage>
.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b4"><mixed-citation><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Braid</surname>
, <given-names>A.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 (<year>2003</year>
), “<article-title><italic>The use of electronic journals in a document delivery service</italic>
</article-title>
”, <source><italic>Serials</italic>
</source>
, Vol. <volume>16</volume>
 No. <issue>1</issue>
, pp. <fpage>37</fpage>
<x>‐</x>
<lpage>40</lpage>
.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b5"><mixed-citation><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>British Library</string-name>
</person-group>
 (<year>2003</year>
), <source><italic>The British Library Opens Up Its Vast Collections for Secure Electronic Delivery</italic>
</source>
, British Library press release 03/26, 19 June.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b6"><mixed-citation><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Bury</surname>
, <given-names>L.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 (<year>2003</year>
), “<article-title><italic>US libraries challenge Springer merger</italic>
</article-title>
”, <source><italic>The Bookseller</italic>
</source>
, <issue>20 June</issue>
, p. <fpage>8</fpage>
.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b7"><mixed-citation><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Campbell</surname>
, <given-names>R.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 (<year>2003</year>
), “<article-title><italic>Document delivery and journal publishers: the looming end of ILL‐ness?</italic>
</article-title>
”, <source><italic>Logos</italic>
</source>
, Vol. <volume>14</volume>
 No. <issue>1</issue>
, pp. <fpage>16</fpage>
<x>‐</x>
<lpage>19</lpage>
.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b8"><mixed-citation><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Chatterjee</surname>
, <given-names>S.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 <italic>et al.</italic>
, (<year>2002</year>
), “<article-title><italic>Electronic copyright and the librarian</italic>
</article-title>
”, <source><italic>IASLIC Bulletin</italic>
</source>
, Vol. <volume>47</volume>
 No. <issue>2</issue>
, pp. <fpage>97</fpage>
<x>‐</x>
<lpage>106</lpage>
.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b9"><mixed-citation><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>De Groote</surname>
, <given-names>S.L.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 and <person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Dorsch</surname>
, <given-names>J.L.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 (<year>2003</year>
), “<article-title><italic>Measuring use patterns of online journals and databases</italic>
</article-title>
”, <source><italic>Journal of the Medical Library Association</italic>
</source>
, Vol. <volume>91</volume>
 No. <issue>2</issue>
, pp. <fpage>231</fpage>
<x>‐</x>
<lpage>40</lpage>
.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b10"><mixed-citation><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Dessain</surname>
, <given-names>S.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 (<year>2003</year>
), “<article-title><italic>Ingenta optimistic about market potential</italic>
</article-title>
”, <source><italic>Information Today</italic>
</source>
, <issue>April</issue>
, pp. <fpage>27</fpage>
<x>‐</x>
<lpage>8</lpage>
.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b11"><mixed-citation><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Di Majo</surname>
, <given-names>S.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 (<year>2002</year>
), “<article-title><italic>The crisis of scholarly communications: how to solve it?</italic>
</article-title>
”, <source><italic>Bollettino AIB</italic>
</source>
, Vol. <volume>42</volume>
 No. <issue>4</issue>
, pp. <fpage>441</fpage>
<x>‐</x>
<lpage>50</lpage>
.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b12"><mixed-citation><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Felts</surname>
, <given-names>J.W.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 (<year>2002</year>
), “<article-title><italic>Never having to say you're sorry: an integrated WWW based software solution for providing comprehensive access to journal literature</italic>
</article-title>
”, <source><italic>Journal of Library Administration</italic>
</source>
, Vol. <volume>37</volume>
 No. <issue>3/4</issue>
, pp. <fpage>305</fpage>
<x>‐</x>
<lpage>16</lpage>
.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b13"><mixed-citation><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Friend</surname>
, <given-names>F.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 (<year>2003</year>
), “<article-title><italic>Big Deal – good deal? Or is there a better deal?</italic>
</article-title>
”, <source><italic>Learned Publishing</italic>
</source>
, Vol. <volume>16</volume>
 No. <issue>2</issue>
, pp. <fpage>153</fpage>
<x>‐</x>
<lpage>5</lpage>
.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b14"><mixed-citation><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Fuller</surname>
, <given-names>D.H.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 (<year>2002</year>
), “<article-title><italic>Distance learning and interlibrary loan: a look at services and technology</italic>
</article-title>
”, <source><italic>Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Information Supply</italic>
</source>
, Vol. <volume>12</volume>
 No. <issue>4</issue>
, pp. <fpage>15</fpage>
<x>‐</x>
<lpage>25</lpage>
.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b15"><mixed-citation><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Gharbi</surname>
, <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 and <person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Deschatelets</surname>
, <given-names>G.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 (<year>2002</year>
), “<article-title><italic>Les livres électroniques dans le milieu universitaire: formes et usages</italic>
</article-title>
”, <source><italic>Documentation et Bibliothèques</italic>
</source>
, <issue>July/September</issue>
, pp. <fpage>83</fpage>
<x>‐</x>
<lpage>97</lpage>
.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b16"><mixed-citation><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Givler</surname>
, <given-names>P.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 (<year>2003</year>
), “<article-title><italic>Copyright: its for the public good</italic>
</article-title>
”, <source><italic>The Chronicle of Higher Education</italic>
</source>
, <issue>May 9</issue>
, p. <fpage>B20</fpage>
.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b17"><mixed-citation><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Gorraiz</surname>
, <given-names>J.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 and <person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Schlögl</surname>
, <given-names>C.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 (<year>2003</year>
), “<article-title><italic>Eine bibliometrische analyse eines dokumentlieferdienstes am beispiel von Subito: zusammenhang von zeitschriftennachfrage und – zitationshäufigkeiten</italic>
</article-title>
”, <source><italic>Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie</italic>
</source>
, Vol. <volume>50</volume>
 No. <issue>3</issue>
, pp. <fpage>131</fpage>
<x>‐</x>
<lpage>40</lpage>
.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b18"><mixed-citation><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Guédon</surname>
, <given-names>J.C.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 (<year>2003</year>
), “<article-title><italic>Open access archives: from scientific plutocracy to the republic of science</italic>
</article-title>
”, <source><italic>IFLA Journal</italic>
</source>
, Vol. <volume>29</volume>
 No. <issue>2</issue>
, pp. <fpage>120</fpage>
<x>‐</x>
<lpage>40</lpage>
.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b19"><mixed-citation><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Houle</surname>
, <given-names>L.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 and <person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Beckett</surname>
, <given-names>C.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 (<year>2003</year>
), “<article-title><italic>Just in time vs just in case: examining the benefits of subsidized unmediated ordering vs journal subscription: results of two workshops held at the 17th Annual Conference of the North American Serials Interest group</italic>
</article-title>
”, <source><italic>The Serials Librarian</italic>
</source>
, Vol. <volume>44</volume>
 No. <issue>3/4</issue>
, pp. <fpage>265</fpage>
<x>‐</x>
<lpage>9</lpage>
.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b20"><mixed-citation><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Hyams</surname>
, <given-names>E.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 (<year>2003</year>
), “<article-title><italic>Scholarly publishing on the road to Damascus</italic>
</article-title>
”, <source><italic>Update</italic>
</source>
, Vol. <volume>2</volume>
 No. <issue>7</issue>
, pp. <fpage>24</fpage>
<x>‐</x>
<lpage>6</lpage>
.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b21"><mixed-citation><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Ireland</surname>
, <given-names>M.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 and <person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Krym</surname>
, <given-names>N.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 (<year>2002</year>
), “<article-title><italic>Think locally, work globally: international document delivery and CISTI</italic>
</article-title>
”, <source><italic>Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Information Supply</italic>
</source>
, Vol. <volume>12</volume>
 No. <issue>4</issue>
, pp. <fpage>27</fpage>
<x>‐</x>
<lpage>39</lpage>
.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b22"><mixed-citation><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Kelly</surname>
, <given-names>K.B.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 and <person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Orr</surname>
, <given-names>G.J.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 (<year>2003</year>
), “<article-title><italic>Trends in distant student use of electronic resources: a survey</italic>
</article-title>
”, <source><italic>College and Research Libraries</italic>
</source>
, Vol. <volume>64</volume>
 No. <issue>3</issue>
.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b23"><mixed-citation><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>Khan Quay Kin</string-name>
</person-group>
 (<year>2003</year>
), “<article-title><italic>Delivering library services for a branch campus of the University of Nottingham in Malaysia</italic>
</article-title>
”, <source><italic>Relay: The Journal of the University College and Research Group</italic>
</source>
, No. <issue>55</issue>
, pp. <fpage>4</fpage>
<x>‐</x>
<lpage>5</lpage>
.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b24"><mixed-citation><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Kidd</surname>
, <given-names>T.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 (<year>2002</year>
), “<article-title><italic>Electronic journal usage statistics: present practice and future progress</italic>
</article-title>
”, <source><italic>LISU Occasional Paper</italic>
</source>
, No. <issue>32</issue>
, pp. <fpage>67</fpage>
<x>‐</x>
<lpage>72</lpage>
.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b25"><mixed-citation><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Line</surname>
, <given-names>M.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 (<year>2003</year>
), “<article-title><italic>The potential role of e‐books in remote document supply</italic>
</article-title>
”, <source><italic>Interlending & Document Supply</italic>
</source>
, Vol. <volume>31</volume>
 No. <issue>3</issue>
, pp. <fpage>180</fpage>
<x>‐</x>
<lpage>3</lpage>
.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b26"><mixed-citation><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Lord</surname>
, <given-names>J.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 (<year>2003</year>
), “<article-title><italic>Promoting remote use of e‐journals by RCN members across the UK and abroad</italic>
</article-title>
”, <source><italic>Serials</italic>
</source>
, Vol. <volume>16</volume>
 No. <issue>1</issue>
, pp. <fpage>77</fpage>
<x>‐</x>
<lpage>81</lpage>
.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b27"><mixed-citation><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Morris</surname>
, <given-names>S.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 (<year>2003</year>
), “<article-title><italic>Open publishing</italic>
</article-title>
”, <source><italic>Learned Publishing</italic>
</source>
, Vol. <volume>16</volume>
 No. <issue>3</issue>
, pp. <fpage>171</fpage>
<x>‐</x>
<lpage>6</lpage>
.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b28"><mixed-citation><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Nicholas</surname>
, <given-names>D.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
, <person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Huntingdon</surname>
, <given-names>P.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 and <person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Watkinson</surname>
, <given-names>A.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 (<year>2003</year>
), “<article-title><italic>Digital journals, Big Deals and online searching behaviour: a pilot study</italic>
</article-title>
”, <source><italic>Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives</italic>
</source>
, Vol. <volume>55</volume>
 No. <issue>1/2</issue>
, pp. <fpage>84</fpage>
<x>‐</x>
<lpage>109</lpage>
.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b29"><mixed-citation><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Pike</surname>
, <given-names>G.H.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 (<year>2003</year>
), “<article-title><italic>Copyright and the CCC</italic>
</article-title>
”, <source><italic>Information Today</italic>
</source>
, <issue>April</issue>
, pp. <fpage>17</fpage>
<x>‐</x>
<lpage>20</lpage>
.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b30"><mixed-citation><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Rosemann</surname>
, <given-names>U.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 (<year>2003</year>
), “<article-title><italic>Trends in German document delivery services with particular reference to SUBITO</italic>
</article-title>
”, <source><italic>Interlending & Document Supply</italic>
</source>
, Vol. <volume>31</volume>
 No. <issue>3</issue>
, pp. <fpage>184</fpage>
<x>‐</x>
<lpage>86</lpage>
.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b31"><mixed-citation><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Rowse</surname>
, <given-names>M.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 (<year>2003</year>
), “<article-title><italic>The consortium site license: a sustainable model?</italic>
</article-title>
”, <source><italic>Libri</italic>
</source>
, Vol. <volume>53</volume>
 No. <issue>1</issue>
, pp. <fpage>1</fpage>
<x>‐</x>
<lpage>10</lpage>
.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b32"><mixed-citation><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab><italic>Scholarly Communication Report</italic>
</collab>
</person-group>
 (<year>2003</year>
), “<article-title><italic>Don't confuse price with value‐in academic publishing, electronic is better</italic>
</article-title>
”, <source><italic>SCR</italic>
</source>
, Vol. <volume>7</volume>
 No. <issue>3</issue>
, p. <fpage>14</fpage>
.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b33"><mixed-citation><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Seal</surname>
, <given-names>R.A.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 (<year>2002</year>
), “<article-title><italic>Interlibrary loan: integral component of global resource sharing</italic>
</article-title>
”, <source><italic>Resource Sharing & Information Networks</italic>
</source>
, Vol. <volume>16</volume>
 No. <issue>2</issue>
, pp. <fpage>227</fpage>
<x>‐</x>
<lpage>38</lpage>
.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b34"><mixed-citation><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>Swets Blackwell</string-name>
</person-group>
 (<year>2003</year>
), “<article-title><italic>Serial price increases 2003</italic>
</article-title>
”, <source><italic>Update</italic>
</source>
, Vol. <volume>2</volume>
 No. <issue>7</issue>
, pp. <fpage>54</fpage>
<x>‐</x>
<lpage>5</lpage>
.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b35"><mixed-citation><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Thapa</surname>
, <given-names>N.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 <italic>et al.</italic>
 (<year>2002</year>
), “<article-title><italic>E‐publishing: beginning of a new era of e‐journals</italic>
</article-title>
”, <source><italic>IASLIC Bulletin</italic>
</source>
, Vol. <volume>47</volume>
 No. <issue>4</issue>
, pp. <fpage>216</fpage>
<x>‐</x>
<lpage>21</lpage>
.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b100"><mixed-citation><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Van Borm</surname>
, <given-names>J.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 and <person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Corthouts</surname>
, <given-names>J.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 (<year>2003</year>
), “<article-title><italic>Truly European: interlending and document supply in Belgium at the beginning of the twenty‐first century</italic>
</article-title>
”, <source><italic>Interlending & Document Supply</italic>
</source>
, Vol. <volume>31</volume>
 No. <issue>3</issue>
, pp. <fpage>162</fpage>
<x>‐</x>
<lpage>8</lpage>
.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b37"><mixed-citation><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>Van onze correspondent</string-name>
</person-group>
 (<year>2003</year>
), “<article-title><italic>Europese richtlijn auteursrecht:geen hapklare brok in België</italic>
</article-title>
”, <source><italic>Bibliotheek & Archiefgids</italic>
</source>
, Vol. <volume>79</volume>
 No. <issue>3</issue>
, pp. <fpage>7</fpage>
<x>‐</x>
<lpage>14</lpage>
.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b38"><mixed-citation><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Van Orsdel</surname>
, <given-names>L.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 and <person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Born</surname>
, <given-names>K.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 (<year>2003</year>
), “<article-title><italic>Big chill on the Big Deal?</italic>
</article-title>
”, <source><italic>Library Journal</italic>
</source>
, <issue>April 15</issue>
, pp. <fpage>51</fpage>
<x>‐</x>
<lpage>6</lpage>
.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b36"><mixed-citation><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>VanBusKirk</surname>
, <given-names>M.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 and <person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Krym</surname>
, <given-names>N.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 (<year>2003</year>
), “<article-title><italic>Resource sharing roles and responsibilities for CISTI: for better or ILL</italic>
</article-title>
”, <source><italic>Interlending & Document Supply</italic>
</source>
, Vol. <volume>31</volume>
 No. <issue>3</issue>
, pp. <fpage>169</fpage>
<x>‐</x>
<lpage>73</lpage>
.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b39"><mixed-citation><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Velterop</surname>
, <given-names>J.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 (<year>2003</year>
), “<article-title><italic>Should scholarly societies embrace open access (or is it the kiss of death)?</italic>
</article-title>
”, <source><italic>Learned Publishing</italic>
</source>
, Vol. <volume>16</volume>
 No. <issue>3</issue>
, pp. <fpage>167</fpage>
<x>‐</x>
<lpage>9</lpage>
.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b40"><mixed-citation><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Watts</surname>
, <given-names>L.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 (<year>2003</year>
), “<article-title><italic>Document supply: the evolving needs of the library</italic>
</article-title>
”, <source><italic>Learned Publishing</italic>
</source>
, Vol. <volume>16</volume>
 No. <issue>2</issue>
, pp. <fpage>85</fpage>
<x>‐</x>
<lpage>90</lpage>
.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b41"><mixed-citation><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Weible</surname>
, <given-names>C.L.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 and <person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Robben</surname>
, <given-names>C.</given-names>
</string-name>
</person-group>
 (<year>2002</year>
), “<article-title><italic>Calming the tempest: the benefits of using Prospero for electronic document delivery in a large academic library</italic>
</article-title>
”, <source><italic>Journal of InterLibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Information Supply</italic>
</source>
, Vol. <volume>12</volume>
 No. <issue>4</issue>
, pp. <fpage>79</fpage>
<x>‐</x>
<lpage>86</lpage>
.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
<app-group><app id="A1"><title>Appendix. List of journal titles used to write the literature review</title>
<p>If any reader feels that other journals might usefully be added to this list please contact the writer and editor at: mike.mcgrath@ britishlibrary.net</p>
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Abi Technik</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Advances in Serials Management</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>African Journal of Library Archives and Information Science</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Alexandria</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>American Libraries</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Annual Report – OCLC Incorporated</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Aslib Proceedings</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Australasian Public Libraries and Information Services</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Australian Academic and Research Libraries</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Australian Library Journal</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Biblioteche OGGI</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Bibliotekarz</italic>
 – Warszawa</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Bibliotheek en Archiefgids</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Bibliotheksdienst</italic>
 – Berlin</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Bibliotheques</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Biblos</italic>
 – Wien</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Bob</italic>
 – Oslo</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Bollettino Aib</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Bulletin – Bibliotheques de France</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Cahiers de la Documentation</italic>
 – Bruxelles</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Chronicle of Higher Education</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>College and Research Libraries</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Colleges and Research Libraries News</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Comla Bulletin</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Computers In Libraries</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Ctenar</italic>
 – Praha</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>D‐Lib Magazine</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Documentaliste</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Documentation Et Bibliotheques</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>E‐Content</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Electronic Library</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Feliciter</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Focus on International Library and Information Work</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Herald of Library Science</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>IASA Journal</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>IASLIC Bulletin</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>IASLIC Special Publication</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>IATUL Proceedings</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>INCITE</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Index of Conference Proceedings</italic>
 – British Library Document Supply Centre – Monthly Edition</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Indian Journal of Library and Information Science</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Information and Librarianship</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Information Development </italic>
– London</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Information Management Report</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Information Retrieval and Library Automation</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Information Science Abstracts</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Information Services and Use</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Information Technology and Libraries</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Information Technology for Development</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Information Today</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Information Today and Tomorrow</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Informatologia</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>International Information and Library Review</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Internet Librarian</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Internet Reference Services Quarterly</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Irish Library</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Journal of Academic Librarianship</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Journal – Hong Kong Library Association</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Journal – Medical Library Association</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Journal of Information Science</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Journal of Librarianship and Information Science</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Information Supply</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Journal of Library Administration</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Journal of Library and Information Science</italic>
 – Delhi</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Journal of Library and Information Science</italic>
 – Taipei and Illinois</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Konyvtari Figyelo</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Learned Publishing</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>LIBER Quarterly</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Library and Information Briefings</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Library and Information Research News</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Library and Information Science Abstracts</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Library and Information Science Research</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Library and Information Science Research</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Library Collections Acquisitions and Technical Services</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Library Herald</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Library Hi Tech</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Library Hi Tech News</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Library Journal</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Library Management</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Library Management Quarterly</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Library Quarterly</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Library Resources and Technical Services</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Library Review</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Library Times International</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Library Trends</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Library World</italic>
 – Japan</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Libri</italic>
 – Copenhagen</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Logos</italic>
 – London</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Managing Information</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Multimedia Information and Technology</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>New Zealand Libraries</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Online Information – International Meeting</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Online – Weston then Wilton</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Pica Mededelingen</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Przeglad Biblioteczny</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Public Library Journal</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Publishers Weekly</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Quarterly Bulletin</italic>
 – International Association of Agricultural Information Specialists</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Reference and User Services Quarterly</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Resource Sharing and Information Networks</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Resources In Education </italic>
– Washington</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Revista Espanola de Documentacion Cientifica</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecologia</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Scandinavian Public Library Quarterly</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Scholarly Communications</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Serials</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Serials Librarian</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Serials Review</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>South African Journal of Library and Information Science</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Synopsis</italic>
 – Oslo</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Tidskrift For Dokumentation</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Tudomanyos es Muszaki Tajekoztatas</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Unisist Newsletter – General Information Programme</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Vine</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>World Libraries</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Zeitschrift fur Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item><label>• </label>
<p><italic>Zimbabwe Librarian.</italic>
</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</app>
</app-group>
</back>
</article>
</istex:document>
</istex:metadataXml>
<mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Interlending and document supply a review of the recent literature XLVII</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="alternative" lang="en" contentType="CDATA"><title>Interlending and document supply a review of the recent literature XLVII</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Mike</namePart>
<namePart type="family">McGrath</namePart>
<affiliation>Editor of Interlending & Document Supply and is retired after 32 years at the British Library</affiliation>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre type="other" displayLabel="e-literature-review"></genre>
<originInfo><publisher>MCB UP Ltd</publisher>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2003-12-01</dateIssued>
<copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2003</copyrightDate>
</originInfo>
<language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType>
</physicalDescription>
<abstract lang="en">Reviews more than 100 journals and some electronic lists and newsletters for issues and matters relevant to interlending and document supply. In particular, in this review, site licences, distance learning, providers of document supply, pricing, copyright, publishers, usage and open access are examined.</abstract>
<subject><genre>keywords</genre>
<topic>Document delivery</topic>
<topic>Interlibrary loan</topic>
<topic>Copyright law</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Interlending & Document Supply</title>
</titleInfo>
<genre type="journal">journal</genre>
<subject><genre>Emerald Subject Group</genre>
<topic authority="SubjectCodesPrimary" authorityURI="cat-LISC">Library & information science</topic>
<topic authority="SubjectCodesSecondary" authorityURI="cat-CBM">Collection building & management</topic>
<topic authority="SubjectCodesSecondary" authorityURI="cat-LISE">Library & information services</topic>
<topic authority="SubjectCodesSecondary" authorityURI="cat-CONS">Consortia</topic>
<topic authority="SubjectCodesSecondary" authorityURI="cat-SREV">Stock revision</topic>
<topic authority="SubjectCodesSecondary" authorityURI="cat-DOCD">Document delivery</topic>
<topic authority="SubjectCodesSecondary" authorityURI="cat-LDG">Lending</topic>
</subject>
<identifier type="ISSN">0264-1615</identifier>
<identifier type="PublisherID">ilds</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1108/ilds</identifier>
<part><date>2003</date>
<detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption>
<number>31</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption>
<number>4</number>
</detail>
<extent unit="pages"><start>270</start>
<end>279</end>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="istex">67820F440273B4085BB7F460CDF9CB38CD110C2A</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1108/02641610310507004</identifier>
<identifier type="filenameID">1220310407</identifier>
<identifier type="original-pdf">1220310407.pdf</identifier>
<identifier type="href">02641610310507004.pdf</identifier>
<accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© MCB UP Limited</accessCondition>
<recordInfo><recordContentSource>EMERALD</recordContentSource>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
</metadata>
<serie></serie>
</istex>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Belgique/explor/OpenAccessBelV2/Data/Istex/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000122 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000122 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Belgique
   |area=    OpenAccessBelV2
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:67820F440273B4085BB7F460CDF9CB38CD110C2A
   |texte=   Interlending and document supply a review of the recent literature XLVII
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.25.
Data generation: Thu Dec 1 00:43:49 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 14:51:30 2024

	Serveur d'exploration autour du libre accès en Belgique
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration autour du libre accès en Belgique

Interlending and document supply a review of the recent literature XLVII

Interlending and document supply a review of the recent literature XLVII

Source :

Abstract

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri