Serveur d'exploration autour du libre accès en Belgique

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

The influence of boundaries on the management of fisheries resources in the European Union: case studies from the UK

Identifieur interne : 001522 ( Istex/Checkpoint ); précédent : 001521; suivant : 001523

The influence of boundaries on the management of fisheries resources in the European Union: case studies from the UK

Auteurs : Kevin Crean [Royaume-Uni]

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:EC5DEEFB4FB057E3520ED278A85C64F9786A4F9F

Abstract

The definition and reinforcement of boundaries is the first stage in the development of successful management systems for common property resources. The policy makers of the European Union (EU), when formulating the Common Fisheries Policy, opted to make relatively little use of spatial boundaries to regulate access to resources. The EU has sought to create a fisheries exploitation system that ignores sovereign claims to the resource under a property rights regime driven by ‘equal access’. The regime is regulated within a common boundary by means of controls of fish catches, limitation of fishing effort and the implementation of conservation techniques. However, as problems of fisheries management in the EU have escalated, the issue of boundaries has come to the fore. This is reflected in the activities of organisations within the industry that are developing strategies to survive the downturn in benefits flow from the fishery at local, regional and national levels. The analysis developed in the paper demonstrates the difficulties of creating a national boundary based on the concept of a 200-mile exclusive zone. At the regional level, while the boundary that relates to Shetland has created benefits for the local fishermen, it is still a weak institution. The strongest boundary is that of the crab fisheries of the western English Channel. Through the collective will of the resource users this boundary comes closest to achieving the theoretical ideal of establishing a congruence between ecosystem and governance.

Url:
DOI: 10.1016/S0016-7185(00)00003-8


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:EC5DEEFB4FB057E3520ED278A85C64F9786A4F9F

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>The influence of boundaries on the management of fisheries resources in the European Union: case studies from the UK</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Crean, Kevin" sort="Crean, Kevin" uniqKey="Crean K" first="Kevin" last="Crean">Kevin Crean</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:EC5DEEFB4FB057E3520ED278A85C64F9786A4F9F</idno>
<date when="2000" year="2000">2000</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1016/S0016-7185(00)00003-8</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/EC5DEEFB4FB057E3520ED278A85C64F9786A4F9F/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001B12</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">001A02</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">001522</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a">The influence of boundaries on the management of fisheries resources in the European Union: case studies from the UK</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Crean, Kevin" sort="Crean, Kevin" uniqKey="Crean K" first="Kevin" last="Crean">Kevin Crean</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea>International Fisheries Institute, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull HU6 7RX</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Hull HU6 7RX</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">Geoforum</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">GEOF</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0016-7185</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher>
<date type="published" when="2000">2000</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">31</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="315">315</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="328">328</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0016-7185</idno>
</series>
<idno type="istex">EC5DEEFB4FB057E3520ED278A85C64F9786A4F9F</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1016/S0016-7185(00)00003-8</idno>
<idno type="PII">S0016-7185(00)00003-8</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0016-7185</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The definition and reinforcement of boundaries is the first stage in the development of successful management systems for common property resources. The policy makers of the European Union (EU), when formulating the Common Fisheries Policy, opted to make relatively little use of spatial boundaries to regulate access to resources. The EU has sought to create a fisheries exploitation system that ignores sovereign claims to the resource under a property rights regime driven by ‘equal access’. The regime is regulated within a common boundary by means of controls of fish catches, limitation of fishing effort and the implementation of conservation techniques. However, as problems of fisheries management in the EU have escalated, the issue of boundaries has come to the fore. This is reflected in the activities of organisations within the industry that are developing strategies to survive the downturn in benefits flow from the fishery at local, regional and national levels. The analysis developed in the paper demonstrates the difficulties of creating a national boundary based on the concept of a 200-mile exclusive zone. At the regional level, while the boundary that relates to Shetland has created benefits for the local fishermen, it is still a weak institution. The strongest boundary is that of the crab fisheries of the western English Channel. Through the collective will of the resource users this boundary comes closest to achieving the theoretical ideal of establishing a congruence between ecosystem and governance.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>Royaume-Uni</li>
</country>
</list>
<tree>
<country name="Royaume-Uni">
<noRegion>
<name sortKey="Crean, Kevin" sort="Crean, Kevin" uniqKey="Crean K" first="Kevin" last="Crean">Kevin Crean</name>
</noRegion>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Belgique/explor/OpenAccessBelV2/Data/Istex/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001522 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 001522 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Belgique
   |area=    OpenAccessBelV2
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Checkpoint
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:EC5DEEFB4FB057E3520ED278A85C64F9786A4F9F
   |texte=   The influence of boundaries on the management of fisheries resources in the European Union: case studies from the UK
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.25.
Data generation: Thu Dec 1 00:43:49 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 14:51:30 2024