Terminal feedback outperforms concurrent visual, auditory, and haptic feedback in learning a complex rowing-type task.
Identifieur interne : 000883 ( PubMed/Curation ); précédent : 000882; suivant : 000884Terminal feedback outperforms concurrent visual, auditory, and haptic feedback in learning a complex rowing-type task.
Auteurs : Roland Sigrist [Suisse] ; Georg Rauter ; Robert Riener ; Peter WolfSource :
- Journal of motor behavior [ 1940-1027 ] ; 2013.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
Abstract
Augmented feedback, provided by coaches or displays, is a well-established strategy to accelerate motor learning. Frequent terminal feedback and concurrent feedback have been shown to be detrimental for simple motor task learning but supportive for complex motor task learning. However, conclusions on optimal feedback strategies have been mainly drawn from studies on artificial laboratory tasks with visual feedback only. Therefore, the authors compared the effectiveness of learning a complex, 3-dimensional rowing-type task with either concurrent visual, auditory, or haptic feedback to self-controlled terminal visual feedback. Results revealed that terminal visual feedback was most effective because it emphasized the internalization of task-relevant aspects. In contrast, concurrent feedback fostered the correction of task-irrelevant errors, which hindered learning. The concurrent visual and haptic feedback group performed much better during training with the feedback than in nonfeedback trials. Auditory feedback based on sonification of the movement error was not practical for training the 3-dimensional movement for most participants. Concurrent multimodal feedback in combination with terminal feedback may be most effective, especially if the feedback strategy is adapted to individual preferences and skill level.
DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2013.826169
PubMed: 24006910
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000883
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:24006910Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Terminal feedback outperforms concurrent visual, auditory, and haptic feedback in learning a complex rowing-type task.</title><author><name sortKey="Sigrist, Roland" sort="Sigrist, Roland" uniqKey="Sigrist R" first="Roland" last="Sigrist">Roland Sigrist</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>a Sensory-Motor Systems Lab, ETH Zurich & Spinal Cord Injury Center, University Hospital Balgrist , Zurich , Switzerland.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Suisse</country><wicri:regionArea>a Sensory-Motor Systems Lab, ETH Zurich & Spinal Cord Injury Center, University Hospital Balgrist , Zurich </wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Rauter, Georg" sort="Rauter, Georg" uniqKey="Rauter G" first="Georg" last="Rauter">Georg Rauter</name></author><author><name sortKey="Riener, Robert" sort="Riener, Robert" uniqKey="Riener R" first="Robert" last="Riener">Robert Riener</name></author><author><name sortKey="Wolf, Peter" sort="Wolf, Peter" uniqKey="Wolf P" first="Peter" last="Wolf">Peter Wolf</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2013">2013</date><idno type="doi">10.1080/00222895.2013.826169</idno><idno type="RBID">pubmed:24006910</idno><idno type="pmid">24006910</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000883</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000883</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Terminal feedback outperforms concurrent visual, auditory, and haptic feedback in learning a complex rowing-type task.</title><author><name sortKey="Sigrist, Roland" sort="Sigrist, Roland" uniqKey="Sigrist R" first="Roland" last="Sigrist">Roland Sigrist</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>a Sensory-Motor Systems Lab, ETH Zurich & Spinal Cord Injury Center, University Hospital Balgrist , Zurich , Switzerland.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Suisse</country><wicri:regionArea>a Sensory-Motor Systems Lab, ETH Zurich & Spinal Cord Injury Center, University Hospital Balgrist , Zurich </wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Rauter, Georg" sort="Rauter, Georg" uniqKey="Rauter G" first="Georg" last="Rauter">Georg Rauter</name></author><author><name sortKey="Riener, Robert" sort="Riener, Robert" uniqKey="Riener R" first="Robert" last="Riener">Robert Riener</name></author><author><name sortKey="Wolf, Peter" sort="Wolf, Peter" uniqKey="Wolf P" first="Peter" last="Wolf">Peter Wolf</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of motor behavior</title><idno type="eISSN">1940-1027</idno><imprint><date when="2013" type="published">2013</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Acoustic Stimulation</term><term>Adult</term><term>Auditory Perception (physiology)</term><term>Feedback, Sensory (physiology)</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Learning</term><term>Male</term><term>Movement (physiology)</term><term>Photic Stimulation</term><term>Psychomotor Performance (physiology)</term><term>Touch Perception (physiology)</term><term>Visual Perception (physiology)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Auditory Perception</term><term>Feedback, Sensory</term><term>Movement</term><term>Psychomotor Performance</term><term>Touch Perception</term><term>Visual Perception</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Acoustic Stimulation</term><term>Adult</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Learning</term><term>Male</term><term>Photic Stimulation</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Augmented feedback, provided by coaches or displays, is a well-established strategy to accelerate motor learning. Frequent terminal feedback and concurrent feedback have been shown to be detrimental for simple motor task learning but supportive for complex motor task learning. However, conclusions on optimal feedback strategies have been mainly drawn from studies on artificial laboratory tasks with visual feedback only. Therefore, the authors compared the effectiveness of learning a complex, 3-dimensional rowing-type task with either concurrent visual, auditory, or haptic feedback to self-controlled terminal visual feedback. Results revealed that terminal visual feedback was most effective because it emphasized the internalization of task-relevant aspects. In contrast, concurrent feedback fostered the correction of task-irrelevant errors, which hindered learning. The concurrent visual and haptic feedback group performed much better during training with the feedback than in nonfeedback trials. Auditory feedback based on sonification of the movement error was not practical for training the 3-dimensional movement for most participants. Concurrent multimodal feedback in combination with terminal feedback may be most effective, especially if the feedback strategy is adapted to individual preferences and skill level.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">24006910</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2013</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>24</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2014</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>09</Day></DateCompleted><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1940-1027</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>45</Volume><Issue>6</Issue><PubDate><Year>2013</Year></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Journal of motor behavior</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J Mot Behav</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Terminal feedback outperforms concurrent visual, auditory, and haptic feedback in learning a complex rowing-type task.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>455-72</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1080/00222895.2013.826169</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Augmented feedback, provided by coaches or displays, is a well-established strategy to accelerate motor learning. Frequent terminal feedback and concurrent feedback have been shown to be detrimental for simple motor task learning but supportive for complex motor task learning. However, conclusions on optimal feedback strategies have been mainly drawn from studies on artificial laboratory tasks with visual feedback only. Therefore, the authors compared the effectiveness of learning a complex, 3-dimensional rowing-type task with either concurrent visual, auditory, or haptic feedback to self-controlled terminal visual feedback. Results revealed that terminal visual feedback was most effective because it emphasized the internalization of task-relevant aspects. In contrast, concurrent feedback fostered the correction of task-irrelevant errors, which hindered learning. The concurrent visual and haptic feedback group performed much better during training with the feedback than in nonfeedback trials. Auditory feedback based on sonification of the movement error was not practical for training the 3-dimensional movement for most participants. Concurrent multimodal feedback in combination with terminal feedback may be most effective, especially if the feedback strategy is adapted to individual preferences and skill level.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Sigrist</LastName><ForeName>Roland</ForeName><Initials>R</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>a Sensory-Motor Systems Lab, ETH Zurich & Spinal Cord Injury Center, University Hospital Balgrist , Zurich , Switzerland.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Rauter</LastName><ForeName>Georg</ForeName><Initials>G</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Riener</LastName><ForeName>Robert</ForeName><Initials>R</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Wolf</LastName><ForeName>Peter</ForeName><Initials>P</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2013</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>05</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>J Mot Behav</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0236512</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0022-2895</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000161">Acoustic Stimulation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000328">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D001307">Auditory Perception</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D056228">Feedback, Sensory</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005260">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D007858">Learning</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008297">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D009068">Movement</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D010775">Photic Stimulation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D011597">Psychomotor Performance</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D055698">Touch Perception</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D014796">Visual Perception</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="aheadofprint"><Year>2013</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>5</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2013</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>7</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2013</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>7</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2014</Year><Month>6</Month><Day>10</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1080/00222895.2013.826169</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24006910</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000883 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000883 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:24006910
|texte= Terminal feedback outperforms concurrent visual, auditory, and haptic feedback in learning a complex rowing-type task.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:24006910" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |