Reducing the motor response in haptic parallel matching eliminates the typically observed gender difference.
Identifieur interne : 000249 ( PubMed/Curation ); précédent : 000248; suivant : 000250Reducing the motor response in haptic parallel matching eliminates the typically observed gender difference.
Auteurs : Hanneke I. Van Mier [Pays-Bas]Source :
- Experimental brain research [ 1432-1106 ] ; 2016.
Abstract
When making two bars haptically parallel to each other, large deviations have been observed, most likely caused by the bias of a hand-centered egocentric reference frame. A consistent finding is that women show significantly larger deviations than men when performing this task. It has been suggested that this difference might be due to the fact that women are more egocentrically oriented than men or are less efficient in overcoming the egocentric bias of the hand. If this is indeed the case, reducing the bias of the egocentric reference frame should eliminate the above-mentioned gender difference. This was investigated in the current study. Sixty participants (30 men, 30 women) were instructed to haptically match (task HP) the orientation of a test bar with the dominant hand to the orientation of a reference bar that was perceived with the non-dominant hand. In a haptic visual task (task HV), in which only the reference bar and exploring hand were out of view, no motor response was required, but participants had to "match" the perceived orientation by verbally naming the parallel orientation that was read out on a test protractor. Both females and males performed better in the HV task than in the HP task. Significant gender effects were only found in the haptic parallelity task (HP), corroborating the idea that women perform at the same level as men when the egocentric bias of the hand is reduced.
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4437-z
PubMed: 26378006
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000249
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:26378006Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Reducing the motor response in haptic parallel matching eliminates the typically observed gender difference.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Van Mier, Hanneke I" sort="Van Mier, Hanneke I" uniqKey="Van Mier H" first="Hanneke I" last="Van Mier">Hanneke I. Van Mier</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands. h.vanmier@maastrichtuniversity.nl.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2016">2016</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:26378006</idno>
<idno type="pmid">26378006</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1007/s00221-015-4437-z</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000249</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000249</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Reducing the motor response in haptic parallel matching eliminates the typically observed gender difference.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Van Mier, Hanneke I" sort="Van Mier, Hanneke I" uniqKey="Van Mier H" first="Hanneke I" last="Van Mier">Hanneke I. Van Mier</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands. h.vanmier@maastrichtuniversity.nl.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">Experimental brain research</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1432-1106</idno>
<imprint><date when="2016" type="published">2016</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">When making two bars haptically parallel to each other, large deviations have been observed, most likely caused by the bias of a hand-centered egocentric reference frame. A consistent finding is that women show significantly larger deviations than men when performing this task. It has been suggested that this difference might be due to the fact that women are more egocentrically oriented than men or are less efficient in overcoming the egocentric bias of the hand. If this is indeed the case, reducing the bias of the egocentric reference frame should eliminate the above-mentioned gender difference. This was investigated in the current study. Sixty participants (30 men, 30 women) were instructed to haptically match (task HP) the orientation of a test bar with the dominant hand to the orientation of a reference bar that was perceived with the non-dominant hand. In a haptic visual task (task HV), in which only the reference bar and exploring hand were out of view, no motor response was required, but participants had to "match" the perceived orientation by verbally naming the parallel orientation that was read out on a test protractor. Both females and males performed better in the HV task than in the HP task. Significant gender effects were only found in the haptic parallelity task (HP), corroborating the idea that women perform at the same level as men when the egocentric bias of the hand is reduced.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="In-Process"><PMID Version="1">26378006</PMID>
<DateCreated><Year>2016</Year>
<Month>01</Month>
<Day>15</Day>
</DateCreated>
<DateRevised><Year>2016</Year>
<Month>01</Month>
<Day>22</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1432-1106</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>234</Volume>
<Issue>1</Issue>
<PubDate><Year>2016</Year>
<Month>Jan</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Experimental brain research</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Exp Brain Res</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Reducing the motor response in haptic parallel matching eliminates the typically observed gender difference.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>105-12</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1007/s00221-015-4437-z</ELocationID>
<Abstract><AbstractText>When making two bars haptically parallel to each other, large deviations have been observed, most likely caused by the bias of a hand-centered egocentric reference frame. A consistent finding is that women show significantly larger deviations than men when performing this task. It has been suggested that this difference might be due to the fact that women are more egocentrically oriented than men or are less efficient in overcoming the egocentric bias of the hand. If this is indeed the case, reducing the bias of the egocentric reference frame should eliminate the above-mentioned gender difference. This was investigated in the current study. Sixty participants (30 men, 30 women) were instructed to haptically match (task HP) the orientation of a test bar with the dominant hand to the orientation of a reference bar that was perceived with the non-dominant hand. In a haptic visual task (task HV), in which only the reference bar and exploring hand were out of view, no motor response was required, but participants had to "match" the perceived orientation by verbally naming the parallel orientation that was read out on a test protractor. Both females and males performed better in the HV task than in the HP task. Significant gender effects were only found in the haptic parallelity task (HP), corroborating the idea that women perform at the same level as men when the egocentric bias of the hand is reduced.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>van Mier</LastName>
<ForeName>Hanneke I</ForeName>
<Initials>HI</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands. h.vanmier@maastrichtuniversity.nl.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2015</Year>
<Month>09</Month>
<Day>16</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Germany</Country>
<MedlineTA>Exp Brain Res</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>0043312</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0014-4819</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 2006 Aug;173(3):407-14</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16506007</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuropsychologia. 2007 Jan 28;45(2):332-41</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16904136</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 2007 Feb;69(2):276-86</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17557597</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cereb Cortex. 2007 Jul;17(7):1637-49</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16966490</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 2007 Oct;183(1):75-85</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17624519</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Can J Exp Psychol. 2007 Sep;61(3):208-18</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17974315</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 2008 Jun;188(2):199-213</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">18368397</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 2008 Sep;190(1):31-41</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">18553074</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 2008 Oct;70(7):1197-206</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">18927003</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Acta Psychol (Amst). 2009 Mar;130(3):251-9</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">19243731</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 2011 Feb;208(3):467-73</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">21132493</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Mar;136(3):382-9</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">21295763</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Behav Neurosci. 2012 Jun;126(3):465-78</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">22642888</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013 Oct;144(2):352-60</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">23938339</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Perception. 1999;28(8):1001-12</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">10664750</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Perception. 1999;28(6):781-95</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">10664771</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Acta Psychol (Amst). 2002 Jan;109(1):25-40</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11767728</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Curr Biol. 2002 Oct 1;12(19):1661-4</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">12361568</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 2003 Apr;149(3):320-30</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">12632234</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Acta Psychol (Amst). 2003 Oct;114(2):131-45</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">14529821</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Neurophysiol. 2004 Apr;91(4):1808-21</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">14645382</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 2004 Jul;157(2):265-8</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15197527</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Br J Psychol. 2004 Aug;95(Pt 3):339-53</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15296539</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Acta Psychol (Amst). 2004 Nov;117(3):333-40</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15500810</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Perception. 2005;34(6):741-55</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16042194</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 2006 Apr;170(3):403-13</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16328265</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 2006 Jan;68(1):62-75</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16617830</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
</CommentsCorrectionsList>
<OtherID Source="NLM">PMC4713722</OtherID>
<KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Allocentric</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Egocentric</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Frame of reference</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Gender</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Haptic perception</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Parallelity</Keyword>
</KeywordList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2015</Year>
<Month>6</Month>
<Day>9</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2015</Year>
<Month>8</Month>
<Day>30</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="aheadofprint"><Year>2015</Year>
<Month>9</Month>
<Day>16</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2015</Year>
<Month>9</Month>
<Day>18</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2015</Year>
<Month>9</Month>
<Day>18</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2015</Year>
<Month>9</Month>
<Day>18</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26378006</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/s00221-015-4437-z</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pii">10.1007/s00221-015-4437-z</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC4713722</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000249 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000249 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Ticri/CIDE |area= HapticV1 |flux= PubMed |étape= Curation |type= RBID |clé= pubmed:26378006 |texte= Reducing the motor response in haptic parallel matching eliminates the typically observed gender difference. }}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:26378006" \ | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd \ | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. | ![]() |