Haptic force-feedback devices for the office computer: performance and musculoskeletal loading issues.
Identifieur interne : 001D24 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 001D23; suivant : 001D25Haptic force-feedback devices for the office computer: performance and musculoskeletal loading issues.
Auteurs : J T Dennerlein ; M C YangSource :
- Human factors [ 0018-7208 ] ; 2001.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult, Computer Systems, Cumulative Trauma Disorders (prevention & control), Equipment Design, Feedback, Female, Humans, Male, Man-Machine Systems, Musculoskeletal Diseases (prevention & control), Sensitivity and Specificity, Stress, Mechanical, Task Performance and Analysis, User-Computer Interface.
- MESH :
Abstract
Pointing devices, essential input tools for the graphical user interface (GUI) of desktop computers, require precise motor control and dexterity to use. Haptic force-feedback devices provide the human operator with tactile cues, adding the sense of touch to existing visual and auditory interfaces. However, the performance enhancements, comfort, and possible musculoskeletal loading of using a force-feedback device in an office environment are unknown. Hypothesizing that the time to perform a task and the self-reported pain and discomfort of the task improve with the addition of force feedback, 26 people ranging in age from 22 to 44 years performed a point-and-click task 540 times with and without an attractive force field surrounding the desired target. The point-and-click movements were approximately 25% faster with the addition of force feedback (paired t-tests, p < 0.001). Perceived user discomfort and pain, as measured through a questionnaire, were also smaller with the addition of force feedback (p < 0.001). However, this difference decreased as additional distracting force fields were added to the task environment, simulating a more realistic work situation. These results suggest that for a given task, use of a force-feedback device improves performance, and potentially reduces musculoskeletal loading during mouse use. Actual or potential applications of this research include human-computer interface design, specifically that of the pointing device extensively used for the graphical user interface.
PubMed: 11592668
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:11592668Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Haptic force-feedback devices for the office computer: performance and musculoskeletal loading issues.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Dennerlein, J T" sort="Dennerlein, J T" uniqKey="Dennerlein J" first="J T" last="Dennerlein">J T Dennerlein</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. jax@hsph.harvard.edu</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Yang, M C" sort="Yang, M C" uniqKey="Yang M" first="M C" last="Yang">M C Yang</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2001">2001</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:11592668</idno>
<idno type="pmid">11592668</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001D24</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Haptic force-feedback devices for the office computer: performance and musculoskeletal loading issues.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Dennerlein, J T" sort="Dennerlein, J T" uniqKey="Dennerlein J" first="J T" last="Dennerlein">J T Dennerlein</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. jax@hsph.harvard.edu</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Yang, M C" sort="Yang, M C" uniqKey="Yang M" first="M C" last="Yang">M C Yang</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">Human factors</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0018-7208</idno>
<imprint><date when="2001" type="published">2001</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term>
<term>Computer Systems</term>
<term>Cumulative Trauma Disorders (prevention & control)</term>
<term>Equipment Design</term>
<term>Feedback</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Man-Machine Systems</term>
<term>Musculoskeletal Diseases (prevention & control)</term>
<term>Sensitivity and Specificity</term>
<term>Stress, Mechanical</term>
<term>Task Performance and Analysis</term>
<term>User-Computer Interface</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="prevention & control" xml:lang="en"><term>Cumulative Trauma Disorders</term>
<term>Musculoskeletal Diseases</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term>
<term>Computer Systems</term>
<term>Equipment Design</term>
<term>Feedback</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Man-Machine Systems</term>
<term>Sensitivity and Specificity</term>
<term>Stress, Mechanical</term>
<term>Task Performance and Analysis</term>
<term>User-Computer Interface</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Pointing devices, essential input tools for the graphical user interface (GUI) of desktop computers, require precise motor control and dexterity to use. Haptic force-feedback devices provide the human operator with tactile cues, adding the sense of touch to existing visual and auditory interfaces. However, the performance enhancements, comfort, and possible musculoskeletal loading of using a force-feedback device in an office environment are unknown. Hypothesizing that the time to perform a task and the self-reported pain and discomfort of the task improve with the addition of force feedback, 26 people ranging in age from 22 to 44 years performed a point-and-click task 540 times with and without an attractive force field surrounding the desired target. The point-and-click movements were approximately 25% faster with the addition of force feedback (paired t-tests, p < 0.001). Perceived user discomfort and pain, as measured through a questionnaire, were also smaller with the addition of force feedback (p < 0.001). However, this difference decreased as additional distracting force fields were added to the task environment, simulating a more realistic work situation. These results suggest that for a given task, use of a force-feedback device improves performance, and potentially reduces musculoskeletal loading during mouse use. Actual or potential applications of this research include human-computer interface design, specifically that of the pointing device extensively used for the graphical user interface.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">11592668</PMID>
<DateCreated><Year>2001</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>10</Day>
</DateCreated>
<DateCompleted><Year>2001</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>01</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised><Year>2006</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>15</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0018-7208</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>43</Volume>
<Issue>2</Issue>
<PubDate><Year>2001</Year>
<Season>Summer</Season>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Human factors</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Hum Factors</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Haptic force-feedback devices for the office computer: performance and musculoskeletal loading issues.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>278-86</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<Abstract><AbstractText>Pointing devices, essential input tools for the graphical user interface (GUI) of desktop computers, require precise motor control and dexterity to use. Haptic force-feedback devices provide the human operator with tactile cues, adding the sense of touch to existing visual and auditory interfaces. However, the performance enhancements, comfort, and possible musculoskeletal loading of using a force-feedback device in an office environment are unknown. Hypothesizing that the time to perform a task and the self-reported pain and discomfort of the task improve with the addition of force feedback, 26 people ranging in age from 22 to 44 years performed a point-and-click task 540 times with and without an attractive force field surrounding the desired target. The point-and-click movements were approximately 25% faster with the addition of force feedback (paired t-tests, p < 0.001). Perceived user discomfort and pain, as measured through a questionnaire, were also smaller with the addition of force feedback (p < 0.001). However, this difference decreased as additional distracting force fields were added to the task environment, simulating a more realistic work situation. These results suggest that for a given task, use of a force-feedback device improves performance, and potentially reduces musculoskeletal loading during mouse use. Actual or potential applications of this research include human-computer interface design, specifically that of the pointing device extensively used for the graphical user interface.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Dennerlein</LastName>
<ForeName>J T</ForeName>
<Initials>JT</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. jax@hsph.harvard.edu</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Yang</LastName>
<ForeName>M C</ForeName>
<Initials>MC</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country>
<MedlineTA>Hum Factors</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>0374660</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0018-7208</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<CitationSubset>S</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000328">Adult</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D003199">Computer Systems</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D012090">Cumulative Trauma Disorders</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000517">prevention & control</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D004867">Equipment Design</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D005246">Feedback</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005260">Female</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008297">Male</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D008328">Man-Machine Systems</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D009140">Musculoskeletal Diseases</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000517">prevention & control</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D012680">Sensitivity and Specificity</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D013314">Stress, Mechanical</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D013647">Task Performance and Analysis</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D014584">User-Computer Interface</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2001</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>11</Day>
<Hour>10</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2001</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>3</Day>
<Hour>10</Hour>
<Minute>1</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2001</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>11</Day>
<Hour>10</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11592668</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001D24 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001D24 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Ticri/CIDE |area= HapticV1 |flux= PubMed |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= pubmed:11592668 |texte= Haptic force-feedback devices for the office computer: performance and musculoskeletal loading issues. }}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:11592668" \ | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \ | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. | ![]() |