A comparison of the effects of depth rotation on visual and haptic three-dimensional object recognition.
Identifieur interne : 001240 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 001239; suivant : 001241A comparison of the effects of depth rotation on visual and haptic three-dimensional object recognition.
Auteurs : Rebecca LawsonSource :
- Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance [ 0096-1523 ] ; 2009.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
Abstract
A sequential matching task was used to compare how the difficulty of shape discrimination influences the achievement of object constancy for depth rotations across haptic and visual object recognition. Stimuli were nameable, 3-dimensional plastic models of familiar objects (e.g., bed, chair) and morphs midway between these endpoint shapes (e.g., a bed-chair morph). The 2 objects presented on a trial were either both placed at the same orientation or were rotated by 90 degrees relative to each other. Discrimination difficulty was increased by presenting more similarly shaped objects on mismatch trials (easy: bed, then lizard; medium: bed, then chair; hard: bed, then bed-chair morph). For within-modal visual matching, orientation changes were most disruptive when shape discrimination was hardest. This interaction for 3-dimensional objects replicated the interaction reported in earlier studies presenting 2-dimensional pictures of the same objects (Lawson & Bülthoff, 2008). In contrast, orientation changes and discrimination difficulty had additive effects on within-modal haptic and cross-modal visual-to-haptic matching, whereas cross-modal haptic-to-visual matching was orientation invariant. These results suggest that the cause of orientation sensitivity may differ for visual and haptic object recognition.
DOI: 10.1037/a0015025
PubMed: 19653738
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:19653738Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A comparison of the effects of depth rotation on visual and haptic three-dimensional object recognition.</title><author><name sortKey="Lawson, Rebecca" sort="Lawson, Rebecca" uniqKey="Lawson R" first="Rebecca" last="Lawson">Rebecca Lawson</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>School of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Eleanor Rathbone Building, Bedford Street South, Liverpool L69 7ZA, UK. rlawson@liverpool.ac.uk</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2009">2009</date><idno type="doi">10.1037/a0015025</idno><idno type="RBID">pubmed:19653738</idno><idno type="pmid">19653738</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001240</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">A comparison of the effects of depth rotation on visual and haptic three-dimensional object recognition.</title><author><name sortKey="Lawson, Rebecca" sort="Lawson, Rebecca" uniqKey="Lawson R" first="Rebecca" last="Lawson">Rebecca Lawson</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>School of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Eleanor Rathbone Building, Bedford Street South, Liverpool L69 7ZA, UK. rlawson@liverpool.ac.uk</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</title><idno type="ISSN">0096-1523</idno><imprint><date when="2009" type="published">2009</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adolescent</term><term>Adult</term><term>Depth Perception</term><term>Discrimination (Psychology)</term><term>Form Perception</term><term>Humans</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Pattern Recognition, Visual</term><term>Reaction Time</term><term>Recognition (Psychology)</term><term>Rotation</term><term>Stereognosis</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adolescent</term><term>Adult</term><term>Depth Perception</term><term>Discrimination (Psychology)</term><term>Form Perception</term><term>Humans</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Pattern Recognition, Visual</term><term>Reaction Time</term><term>Recognition (Psychology)</term><term>Rotation</term><term>Stereognosis</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">A sequential matching task was used to compare how the difficulty of shape discrimination influences the achievement of object constancy for depth rotations across haptic and visual object recognition. Stimuli were nameable, 3-dimensional plastic models of familiar objects (e.g., bed, chair) and morphs midway between these endpoint shapes (e.g., a bed-chair morph). The 2 objects presented on a trial were either both placed at the same orientation or were rotated by 90 degrees relative to each other. Discrimination difficulty was increased by presenting more similarly shaped objects on mismatch trials (easy: bed, then lizard; medium: bed, then chair; hard: bed, then bed-chair morph). For within-modal visual matching, orientation changes were most disruptive when shape discrimination was hardest. This interaction for 3-dimensional objects replicated the interaction reported in earlier studies presenting 2-dimensional pictures of the same objects (Lawson & Bülthoff, 2008). In contrast, orientation changes and discrimination difficulty had additive effects on within-modal haptic and cross-modal visual-to-haptic matching, whereas cross-modal haptic-to-visual matching was orientation invariant. These results suggest that the cause of orientation sensitivity may differ for visual and haptic object recognition.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">19653738</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2009</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>05</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2009</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>06</Day></DateCompleted><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0096-1523</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>35</Volume><Issue>4</Issue><PubDate><Year>2009</Year><Month>Aug</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>A comparison of the effects of depth rotation on visual and haptic three-dimensional object recognition.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>911-30</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1037/a0015025</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>A sequential matching task was used to compare how the difficulty of shape discrimination influences the achievement of object constancy for depth rotations across haptic and visual object recognition. Stimuli were nameable, 3-dimensional plastic models of familiar objects (e.g., bed, chair) and morphs midway between these endpoint shapes (e.g., a bed-chair morph). The 2 objects presented on a trial were either both placed at the same orientation or were rotated by 90 degrees relative to each other. Discrimination difficulty was increased by presenting more similarly shaped objects on mismatch trials (easy: bed, then lizard; medium: bed, then chair; hard: bed, then bed-chair morph). For within-modal visual matching, orientation changes were most disruptive when shape discrimination was hardest. This interaction for 3-dimensional objects replicated the interaction reported in earlier studies presenting 2-dimensional pictures of the same objects (Lawson & Bülthoff, 2008). In contrast, orientation changes and discrimination difficulty had additive effects on within-modal haptic and cross-modal visual-to-haptic matching, whereas cross-modal haptic-to-visual matching was orientation invariant. These results suggest that the cause of orientation sensitivity may differ for visual and haptic object recognition.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Lawson</LastName><ForeName>Rebecca</ForeName><Initials>R</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>School of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Eleanor Rathbone Building, Bedford Street South, Liverpool L69 7ZA, UK. rlawson@liverpool.ac.uk</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016430">Clinical Trial</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>7502589</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0096-1523</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000293">Adolescent</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000328">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D003867">Depth Perception</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D004192">Discrimination (Psychology)</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005556">Form Perception</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008875">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D010364">Pattern Recognition, Visual</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D011930">Reaction Time</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D021641">Recognition (Psychology)</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D012399">Rotation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D013236">Stereognosis</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2009</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>6</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2009</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>6</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2009</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>7</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pii">2009-11357-021</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1037/a0015025</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19653738</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001240 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001240 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:19653738
|texte= A comparison of the effects of depth rotation on visual and haptic three-dimensional object recognition.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:19653738" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |