Range dependent processing of visual numerosity: similarities across vision and haptics.
Identifieur interne : 001078 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 001077; suivant : 001079Range dependent processing of visual numerosity: similarities across vision and haptics.
Auteurs : Myrthe A. Plaisier ; Wouter M. Bergmann Tiest ; Astrid M L. KappersSource :
- Experimental brain research [ 1432-1106 ] ; 2010.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adolescent, Discrimination (Psychology) (physiology), Female, Hand, Hand Strength (physiology), Humans, Judgment, Male, Mathematics, Models, Psychological, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Reaction Time, Recognition (Psychology), Regression Analysis, Touch Perception (physiology), Vision, Ocular, Visual Perception (physiology), Young Adult.
- MESH :
Abstract
'Subitizing' refers to fast and accurate judgement of small numerosities, whereas for larger numerosities either counting or estimation are used. Counting is slow and precise, whereas estimation is fast but imprecise. In this study consisting of five experiments we investigated if and how the numerosity judgement process is affected by the relative spacing between the presented numerosities. To this end we let subjects judge the number of dots presented on a screen and recorded their response times. Our results show that subjects switch from counting to estimation if the relative differences between subsequent numerosities are large (a factor of 2), but that numerosity judgement in the subitizing range was still faster. We also show this fast performance for small numerosities only occurred when numerosity information is present. This indicates this is typical for number processing and not magnitude estimation in general. Furthermore, comparison with a previous haptic study suggests similar processing in numerosity judgement through haptics and vision.
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2319-y
PubMed: 20549196
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:20549196Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Range dependent processing of visual numerosity: similarities across vision and haptics.</title><author><name sortKey="Plaisier, Myrthe A" sort="Plaisier, Myrthe A" uniqKey="Plaisier M" first="Myrthe A" last="Plaisier">Myrthe A. Plaisier</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Helmholtz Institute, Universiteit Utrecht, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands. m.plaisier@fbw.vu.nl</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bergmann Tiest, Wouter M" sort="Bergmann Tiest, Wouter M" uniqKey="Bergmann Tiest W" first="Wouter M" last="Bergmann Tiest">Wouter M. Bergmann Tiest</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kappers, Astrid M L" sort="Kappers, Astrid M L" uniqKey="Kappers A" first="Astrid M L" last="Kappers">Astrid M L. Kappers</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2010">2010</date><idno type="doi">10.1007/s00221-010-2319-y</idno><idno type="RBID">pubmed:20549196</idno><idno type="pmid">20549196</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001078</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Range dependent processing of visual numerosity: similarities across vision and haptics.</title><author><name sortKey="Plaisier, Myrthe A" sort="Plaisier, Myrthe A" uniqKey="Plaisier M" first="Myrthe A" last="Plaisier">Myrthe A. Plaisier</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Helmholtz Institute, Universiteit Utrecht, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands. m.plaisier@fbw.vu.nl</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bergmann Tiest, Wouter M" sort="Bergmann Tiest, Wouter M" uniqKey="Bergmann Tiest W" first="Wouter M" last="Bergmann Tiest">Wouter M. Bergmann Tiest</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kappers, Astrid M L" sort="Kappers, Astrid M L" uniqKey="Kappers A" first="Astrid M L" last="Kappers">Astrid M L. Kappers</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Experimental brain research</title><idno type="eISSN">1432-1106</idno><imprint><date when="2010" type="published">2010</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adolescent</term><term>Discrimination (Psychology) (physiology)</term><term>Female</term><term>Hand</term><term>Hand Strength (physiology)</term><term>Humans</term><term>Judgment</term><term>Male</term><term>Mathematics</term><term>Models, Psychological</term><term>Pattern Recognition, Visual</term><term>Reaction Time</term><term>Recognition (Psychology)</term><term>Regression Analysis</term><term>Touch Perception (physiology)</term><term>Vision, Ocular</term><term>Visual Perception (physiology)</term><term>Young Adult</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Discrimination (Psychology)</term><term>Hand Strength</term><term>Touch Perception</term><term>Visual Perception</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adolescent</term><term>Female</term><term>Hand</term><term>Humans</term><term>Judgment</term><term>Male</term><term>Mathematics</term><term>Models, Psychological</term><term>Pattern Recognition, Visual</term><term>Reaction Time</term><term>Recognition (Psychology)</term><term>Regression Analysis</term><term>Vision, Ocular</term><term>Young Adult</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">'Subitizing' refers to fast and accurate judgement of small numerosities, whereas for larger numerosities either counting or estimation are used. Counting is slow and precise, whereas estimation is fast but imprecise. In this study consisting of five experiments we investigated if and how the numerosity judgement process is affected by the relative spacing between the presented numerosities. To this end we let subjects judge the number of dots presented on a screen and recorded their response times. Our results show that subjects switch from counting to estimation if the relative differences between subsequent numerosities are large (a factor of 2), but that numerosity judgement in the subitizing range was still faster. We also show this fast performance for small numerosities only occurred when numerosity information is present. This indicates this is typical for number processing and not magnitude estimation in general. Furthermore, comparison with a previous haptic study suggests similar processing in numerosity judgement through haptics and vision.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">20549196</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2010</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>14</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2010</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>10</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2014</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>03</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1432-1106</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>204</Volume><Issue>4</Issue><PubDate><Year>2010</Year><Month>Aug</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Experimental brain research</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Exp Brain Res</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Range dependent processing of visual numerosity: similarities across vision and haptics.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>525-37</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1007/s00221-010-2319-y</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>'Subitizing' refers to fast and accurate judgement of small numerosities, whereas for larger numerosities either counting or estimation are used. Counting is slow and precise, whereas estimation is fast but imprecise. In this study consisting of five experiments we investigated if and how the numerosity judgement process is affected by the relative spacing between the presented numerosities. To this end we let subjects judge the number of dots presented on a screen and recorded their response times. Our results show that subjects switch from counting to estimation if the relative differences between subsequent numerosities are large (a factor of 2), but that numerosity judgement in the subitizing range was still faster. We also show this fast performance for small numerosities only occurred when numerosity information is present. This indicates this is typical for number processing and not magnitude estimation in general. Furthermore, comparison with a previous haptic study suggests similar processing in numerosity judgement through haptics and vision.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Plaisier</LastName><ForeName>Myrthe A</ForeName><Initials>MA</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Helmholtz Institute, Universiteit Utrecht, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands. m.plaisier@fbw.vu.nl</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Bergmann Tiest</LastName><ForeName>Wouter M</ForeName><Initials>WM</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Kappers</LastName><ForeName>Astrid M L</ForeName><Initials>AM</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2010</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>12</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Germany</Country><MedlineTA>Exp Brain Res</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0043312</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0014-4819</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cognition. 2001 Jun;80(1-2):127-58</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11245842</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Acta Psychol (Amst). 2009 Jun;131(2):163-70</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19460685</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2002 Apr;28(2):137-50</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11987871</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Science. 2002 Sep 6;297(5587):1708-11</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12215649</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Anim Cogn. 2002 Sep;5(3):183-6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12357291</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuron. 2003 Jan 9;37(1):149-57</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12526780</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Perception. 2003;32(7):867-70</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12974571</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Sep;10(3):676-82</RefSource><PMID Version="1">14620363</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nature. 1967 Sep 30;215(5109):1519-20</RefSource><PMID Version="1">6052760</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Perception. 1976;5(3):327-34</RefSource><PMID Version="1">980674</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1978 Aug;4(3):397-410</RefSource><PMID Version="1">681889</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 1979 Nov;26(5):374-80</RefSource><PMID Version="1">523281</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 1981 Feb;29(2):106-12</RefSource><PMID Version="1">7255088</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol Gen. 1982 Mar;111(1):1-22</RefSource><PMID Version="1">6460833</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 1982 Aug;32(2):163-70</RefSource><PMID Version="1">7145586</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Spat Vis. 1988;3(3):179-97</RefSource><PMID Version="1">3153671</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 1991 Apr;49(4):303-14</RefSource><PMID Version="1">2030927</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Psychol Res. 1992;54(2):80-90</RefSource><PMID Version="1">1620801</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cognition. 1992 Aug;44(1-2):43-74</RefSource><PMID Version="1">1511586</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1993 Apr;19(2):331-51</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8473843</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Psychol Rev. 1994 Jan;101(1):80-102</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8121961</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Trends Neurosci. 1998 Aug;21(8):355-61</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9720604</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Am J Psychol. 1949 Oct;62(4):498-525</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15392567</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Aug;12(4):675-81</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16447381</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Psychol Sci. 2006 Apr;17(4):271-2</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16623680</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Anim Cogn. 2006 Oct;9(4):377-91</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16909236</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 Dec;59(12):2065-82</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17095488</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Anim Cogn. 2007 Jan;10(1):63-70</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16868736</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuron. 2007 Jan 18;53(2):293-305</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17224409</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Dec;33(6):1389-99</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18085951</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cognition. 2008 Mar;106(3):1221-47</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17678639</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cognition. 2008 Jun;107(3):1135-43</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18068696</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Psychol Sci. 2008 Jun;19(6):607-14</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18578852</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 2008 Jul;70(5):743-60</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18613623</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Psychon Bull Rev. 2001 Dec;8(4):698-707</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11848588</PMID></CommentsCorrections></CommentsCorrectionsList><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000293">Adolescent</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D004192">Discrimination (Psychology)</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005260">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006225">Hand</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D018737">Hand Strength</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D007600">Judgment</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008297">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008433">Mathematics</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008960">Models, Psychological</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D010364">Pattern Recognition, Visual</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D011930">Reaction Time</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D021641">Recognition (Psychology)</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D012044">Regression Analysis</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D055698">Touch Perception</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D014785">Vision, Ocular</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D014796">Visual Perception</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D055815">Young Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><OtherID Source="NLM">PMC2903696</OtherID></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2010</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>17</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2010</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>27</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="aheadofprint"><Year>2010</Year><Month>6</Month><Day>12</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2010</Year><Month>6</Month><Day>16</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2010</Year><Month>6</Month><Day>16</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2010</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>14</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/s00221-010-2319-y</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20549196</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC2903696</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001078 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001078 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:20549196
|texte= Range dependent processing of visual numerosity: similarities across vision and haptics.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:20549196" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |