An investigation into the cause of orientation-sensitivity in haptic object recognition.
Identifieur interne : 000E18 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000E17; suivant : 000E19An investigation into the cause of orientation-sensitivity in haptic object recognition.
Auteurs : Rebecca LawsonSource :
- Seeing and perceiving [ 1878-4755 ] ; 2011.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- methods : Photic Stimulation.
- physiology : Discrimination (Psychology), Form Perception, Orientation, Pattern Recognition, Visual.
- Adult, Cues, Humans, Young Adult.
Abstract
Object orientation influences visual and haptic recognition differently. This could be caused by the two modalities accessing different object representations or it could be due to differences in how each modality acquires information. These two alternatives were investigated using sequential haptic matching tasks. Matches presented the same object twice. Mismatches presented two similarly-shaped objects. Objects were either both placed at the same orientation or were rotated 90° in depth from each other. Experiment 1 manipulated exploration time to test if longer durations weakened orientation-sensitivity by allowing orientation-invariant representations to be extracted. This hypothesis was not supported. Experiment 2 investigated whether the same-orientation advantage resulted from general spatial or motor action cueing rather than the involvement of orientation-specific object representations. To distinguish between these two possibilities, people did a secondary task interleaved within the matching task. They reported the orientation of a fork or spoon which was presented in between the first and second objects. The main axis of the fork/spoon was the same as that of the final object, equating spatial and motor cueing across the same-orientation and orientation-change conditions. Nevertheless, matching remained orientation-sensitive. Together these results suggest that there are separate visual and haptic stored, orientation-specific perceptual representations of objects.
DOI: 10.1163/187847511X579052
PubMed: 21864466
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:21864466Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">An investigation into the cause of orientation-sensitivity in haptic object recognition.</title><author><name sortKey="Lawson, Rebecca" sort="Lawson, Rebecca" uniqKey="Lawson R" first="Rebecca" last="Lawson">Rebecca Lawson</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>School of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Eleanor Rathbone Building, Bedford Street South, Liverpool, L69 7ZA, UK. rlawson@liverpool.ac.uk</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2011">2011</date><idno type="doi">10.1163/187847511X579052</idno><idno type="RBID">pubmed:21864466</idno><idno type="pmid">21864466</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000E18</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">An investigation into the cause of orientation-sensitivity in haptic object recognition.</title><author><name sortKey="Lawson, Rebecca" sort="Lawson, Rebecca" uniqKey="Lawson R" first="Rebecca" last="Lawson">Rebecca Lawson</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>School of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Eleanor Rathbone Building, Bedford Street South, Liverpool, L69 7ZA, UK. rlawson@liverpool.ac.uk</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Seeing and perceiving</title><idno type="ISSN">1878-4755</idno><imprint><date when="2011" type="published">2011</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Cues</term><term>Discrimination (Psychology) (physiology)</term><term>Form Perception (physiology)</term><term>Humans</term><term>Orientation (physiology)</term><term>Pattern Recognition, Visual (physiology)</term><term>Photic Stimulation (methods)</term><term>Young Adult</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Photic Stimulation</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Discrimination (Psychology)</term><term>Form Perception</term><term>Orientation</term><term>Pattern Recognition, Visual</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Cues</term><term>Humans</term><term>Young Adult</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Object orientation influences visual and haptic recognition differently. This could be caused by the two modalities accessing different object representations or it could be due to differences in how each modality acquires information. These two alternatives were investigated using sequential haptic matching tasks. Matches presented the same object twice. Mismatches presented two similarly-shaped objects. Objects were either both placed at the same orientation or were rotated 90° in depth from each other. Experiment 1 manipulated exploration time to test if longer durations weakened orientation-sensitivity by allowing orientation-invariant representations to be extracted. This hypothesis was not supported. Experiment 2 investigated whether the same-orientation advantage resulted from general spatial or motor action cueing rather than the involvement of orientation-specific object representations. To distinguish between these two possibilities, people did a secondary task interleaved within the matching task. They reported the orientation of a fork or spoon which was presented in between the first and second objects. The main axis of the fork/spoon was the same as that of the final object, equating spatial and motor cueing across the same-orientation and orientation-change conditions. Nevertheless, matching remained orientation-sensitive. Together these results suggest that there are separate visual and haptic stored, orientation-specific perceptual representations of objects.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">21864466</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2011</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>25</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2011</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>06</Day></DateCompleted><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">1878-4755</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>24</Volume><Issue>3</Issue><PubDate><Year>2011</Year></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Seeing and perceiving</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Seeing Perceiving</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>An investigation into the cause of orientation-sensitivity in haptic object recognition.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>293-314</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1163/187847511X579052</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Object orientation influences visual and haptic recognition differently. This could be caused by the two modalities accessing different object representations or it could be due to differences in how each modality acquires information. These two alternatives were investigated using sequential haptic matching tasks. Matches presented the same object twice. Mismatches presented two similarly-shaped objects. Objects were either both placed at the same orientation or were rotated 90° in depth from each other. Experiment 1 manipulated exploration time to test if longer durations weakened orientation-sensitivity by allowing orientation-invariant representations to be extracted. This hypothesis was not supported. Experiment 2 investigated whether the same-orientation advantage resulted from general spatial or motor action cueing rather than the involvement of orientation-specific object representations. To distinguish between these two possibilities, people did a secondary task interleaved within the matching task. They reported the orientation of a fork or spoon which was presented in between the first and second objects. The main axis of the fork/spoon was the same as that of the final object, equating spatial and motor cueing across the same-orientation and orientation-change conditions. Nevertheless, matching remained orientation-sensitive. Together these results suggest that there are separate visual and haptic stored, orientation-specific perceptual representations of objects.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Lawson</LastName><ForeName>Rebecca</ForeName><Initials>R</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>School of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Eleanor Rathbone Building, Bedford Street South, Liverpool, L69 7ZA, UK. rlawson@liverpool.ac.uk</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Netherlands</Country><MedlineTA>Seeing Perceiving</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101531524</NlmUniqueID></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000328">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D003463">Cues</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D004192">Discrimination (Psychology)</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005556">Form Perception</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D009949">Orientation</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D010364">Pattern Recognition, Visual</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D010775">Photic Stimulation</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000379">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D055815">Young Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2011</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>26</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2011</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>26</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2011</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>13</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1163/187847511X579052</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21864466</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000E18 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000E18 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:21864466
|texte= An investigation into the cause of orientation-sensitivity in haptic object recognition.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:21864466" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |