Comparison of haptic guidance and error amplification robotic trainings for the learning of a timing-based motor task by healthy seniors.
Identifieur interne : 000368 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000367; suivant : 000369Comparison of haptic guidance and error amplification robotic trainings for the learning of a timing-based motor task by healthy seniors.
Auteurs : Amy E. Bouchard ; Hélène Corriveau ; Marie-Hélène MilotSource :
- Frontiers in systems neuroscience [ 1662-5137 ] ; 2015.
Abstract
With age, a decline in the temporal aspect of movement is observed such as a longer movement execution time and a decreased timing accuracy. Robotic training can represent an interesting approach to help improve movement timing among the elderly. Two types of robotic training-haptic guidance (HG; demonstrating the correct movement for a better movement planning and improved execution of movement) and error amplification (EA; exaggerating movement errors to have a more rapid and complete learning) have been positively used in young healthy subjects to boost timing accuracy. For healthy seniors, only HG training has been used so far where significant and positive timing gains have been obtained. The goal of the study was to evaluate and compare the impact of both HG and EA robotic trainings on the improvement of seniors' movement timing. Thirty-two healthy seniors (mean age 68 ± 4 years) learned to play a pinball-like game by triggering a one-degree-of-freedom hand robot at the proper time to make a flipper move and direct a falling ball toward a randomly positioned target. During HG and EA robotic trainings, the subjects' timing errors were decreased and increased, respectively, based on the subjects' timing errors in initiating a movement. Results showed that only HG training benefited learning, but the improvement did not generalize to untrained targets. Also, age had no influence on the efficacy of HG robotic training, meaning that the oldest subjects did not benefit more from HG training than the younger senior subjects. Using HG to teach the correct timing of movement seems to be a good strategy to improve motor learning for the elderly as for younger people. However, more studies are needed to assess the long-term impact of HG robotic training on improvement in movement timing.
DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2015.00052
PubMed: 25873868
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:25873868Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Comparison of haptic guidance and error amplification robotic trainings for the learning of a timing-based motor task by healthy seniors.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Bouchard, Amy E" sort="Bouchard, Amy E" uniqKey="Bouchard A" first="Amy E" last="Bouchard">Amy E. Bouchard</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Centre de Recherche sur le Vieillissement, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC Canada.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Corriveau, Helene" sort="Corriveau, Helene" uniqKey="Corriveau H" first="Hélène" last="Corriveau">Hélène Corriveau</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Centre de Recherche sur le Vieillissement, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC Canada.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Milot, Marie Helene" sort="Milot, Marie Helene" uniqKey="Milot M" first="Marie-Hélène" last="Milot">Marie-Hélène Milot</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Centre de Recherche sur le Vieillissement, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC Canada.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2015">2015</date>
<idno type="doi">10.3389/fnsys.2015.00052</idno>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:25873868</idno>
<idno type="pmid">25873868</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000368</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Comparison of haptic guidance and error amplification robotic trainings for the learning of a timing-based motor task by healthy seniors.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Bouchard, Amy E" sort="Bouchard, Amy E" uniqKey="Bouchard A" first="Amy E" last="Bouchard">Amy E. Bouchard</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Centre de Recherche sur le Vieillissement, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC Canada.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Corriveau, Helene" sort="Corriveau, Helene" uniqKey="Corriveau H" first="Hélène" last="Corriveau">Hélène Corriveau</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Centre de Recherche sur le Vieillissement, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC Canada.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Milot, Marie Helene" sort="Milot, Marie Helene" uniqKey="Milot M" first="Marie-Hélène" last="Milot">Marie-Hélène Milot</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Centre de Recherche sur le Vieillissement, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC Canada.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">Frontiers in systems neuroscience</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1662-5137</idno>
<imprint><date when="2015" type="published">2015</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">With age, a decline in the temporal aspect of movement is observed such as a longer movement execution time and a decreased timing accuracy. Robotic training can represent an interesting approach to help improve movement timing among the elderly. Two types of robotic training-haptic guidance (HG; demonstrating the correct movement for a better movement planning and improved execution of movement) and error amplification (EA; exaggerating movement errors to have a more rapid and complete learning) have been positively used in young healthy subjects to boost timing accuracy. For healthy seniors, only HG training has been used so far where significant and positive timing gains have been obtained. The goal of the study was to evaluate and compare the impact of both HG and EA robotic trainings on the improvement of seniors' movement timing. Thirty-two healthy seniors (mean age 68 ± 4 years) learned to play a pinball-like game by triggering a one-degree-of-freedom hand robot at the proper time to make a flipper move and direct a falling ball toward a randomly positioned target. During HG and EA robotic trainings, the subjects' timing errors were decreased and increased, respectively, based on the subjects' timing errors in initiating a movement. Results showed that only HG training benefited learning, but the improvement did not generalize to untrained targets. Also, age had no influence on the efficacy of HG robotic training, meaning that the oldest subjects did not benefit more from HG training than the younger senior subjects. Using HG to teach the correct timing of movement seems to be a good strategy to improve motor learning for the elderly as for younger people. However, more studies are needed to assess the long-term impact of HG robotic training on improvement in movement timing.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="PubMed-not-MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">25873868</PMID>
<DateCreated><Year>2015</Year>
<Month>04</Month>
<Day>15</Day>
</DateCreated>
<DateCompleted><Year>2015</Year>
<Month>04</Month>
<Day>15</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised><Year>2015</Year>
<Month>04</Month>
<Day>17</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Electronic-eCollection"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1662-5137</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>9</Volume>
<PubDate><Year>2015</Year>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Frontiers in systems neuroscience</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Front Syst Neurosci</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Comparison of haptic guidance and error amplification robotic trainings for the learning of a timing-based motor task by healthy seniors.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>52</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.3389/fnsys.2015.00052</ELocationID>
<Abstract><AbstractText>With age, a decline in the temporal aspect of movement is observed such as a longer movement execution time and a decreased timing accuracy. Robotic training can represent an interesting approach to help improve movement timing among the elderly. Two types of robotic training-haptic guidance (HG; demonstrating the correct movement for a better movement planning and improved execution of movement) and error amplification (EA; exaggerating movement errors to have a more rapid and complete learning) have been positively used in young healthy subjects to boost timing accuracy. For healthy seniors, only HG training has been used so far where significant and positive timing gains have been obtained. The goal of the study was to evaluate and compare the impact of both HG and EA robotic trainings on the improvement of seniors' movement timing. Thirty-two healthy seniors (mean age 68 ± 4 years) learned to play a pinball-like game by triggering a one-degree-of-freedom hand robot at the proper time to make a flipper move and direct a falling ball toward a randomly positioned target. During HG and EA robotic trainings, the subjects' timing errors were decreased and increased, respectively, based on the subjects' timing errors in initiating a movement. Results showed that only HG training benefited learning, but the improvement did not generalize to untrained targets. Also, age had no influence on the efficacy of HG robotic training, meaning that the oldest subjects did not benefit more from HG training than the younger senior subjects. Using HG to teach the correct timing of movement seems to be a good strategy to improve motor learning for the elderly as for younger people. However, more studies are needed to assess the long-term impact of HG robotic training on improvement in movement timing.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Bouchard</LastName>
<ForeName>Amy E</ForeName>
<Initials>AE</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Centre de Recherche sur le Vieillissement, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC Canada.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Corriveau</LastName>
<ForeName>Hélène</ForeName>
<Initials>H</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Centre de Recherche sur le Vieillissement, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC Canada.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Milot</LastName>
<ForeName>Marie-Hélène</ForeName>
<Initials>MH</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Centre de Recherche sur le Vieillissement, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC Canada.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2015</Year>
<Month>03</Month>
<Day>31</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Switzerland</Country>
<MedlineTA>Front Syst Neurosci</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>101477946</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>1662-5137</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<OtherID Source="NLM">PMC4379877</OtherID>
<KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">aging</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">error amplification</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">haptic guidance</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">learning</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">timing</Keyword>
</KeywordList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="ecollection"><Year>2015</Year>
<Month></Month>
<Day></Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2014</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>22</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2015</Year>
<Month>3</Month>
<Day>12</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="epublish"><Year>2015</Year>
<Month>3</Month>
<Day>31</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2015</Year>
<Month>4</Month>
<Day>16</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2015</Year>
<Month>4</Month>
<Day>16</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2015</Year>
<Month>4</Month>
<Day>16</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>1</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>epublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.3389/fnsys.2015.00052</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25873868</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC4379877</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000368 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000368 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Ticri/CIDE |area= HapticV1 |flux= PubMed |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= pubmed:25873868 |texte= Comparison of haptic guidance and error amplification robotic trainings for the learning of a timing-based motor task by healthy seniors. }}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:25873868" \ | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \ | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. | ![]() |