Roughness perception of unfamiliar dot pattern textures.
Identifieur interne : 000814 ( PubMed/Checkpoint ); précédent : 000813; suivant : 000815Roughness perception of unfamiliar dot pattern textures.
Auteurs : Judith Eck [Pays-Bas] ; Amanda L. Kaas ; Joost L J. Mulders ; Rainer GoebelSource :
- Acta psychologica [ 1873-6297 ] ; 2013.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
Abstract
Both vision and touch yield comparable results in terms of roughness estimation of familiar textures as was shown in earlier studies. To our knowledge, no research has been conducted on the effect of sensory familiarity with the stimulus material on roughness estimation of unfamiliar textures. The influence of sensory modality and familiarity on roughness perception of dot pattern textures was investigated in a series of five experiments. Participants estimated the roughness of textures varying in mean center-to-center dot spacing in experimental conditions providing visual, haptic and visual-haptic combined information. The findings indicate that roughness perception of unfamiliar dot pattern textures is well described by a bi-exponential function of inter-dot spacing, regardless of the sensory modality used. However, sensory modality appears to affect the maximum of the psychophysical roughness function, with visually perceived roughness peaking for a smaller inter-dot spacing than haptic roughness. We propose that this might be due to the better spatial acuity of the visual modality. Individuals appeared to use different visual roughness estimation strategies depending on their first sensory experience (visual vs. haptic) with the stimulus material, primarily in an experimental context which required the combination of visual and haptic information in a single bimodal roughness estimate. Furthermore, the similarity of findings in experimental settings using real and virtual visual textures indicates the suitability of the experimental setup for neuroimaging studies, creating a more direct link between behavioral and neuroimaging results.
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.02.002
PubMed: 23500111
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:23500111Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Roughness perception of unfamiliar dot pattern textures.</title><author><name sortKey="Eck, Judith" sort="Eck, Judith" uniqKey="Eck J" first="Judith" last="Eck">Judith Eck</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Maastricht University, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands. judith.eck@maastrichtuniversity.nl</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country><wicri:regionArea>Maastricht University, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6229 ER Maastricht</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>6229 ER Maastricht</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kaas, Amanda L" sort="Kaas, Amanda L" uniqKey="Kaas A" first="Amanda L" last="Kaas">Amanda L. Kaas</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mulders, Joost L J" sort="Mulders, Joost L J" uniqKey="Mulders J" first="Joost L J" last="Mulders">Joost L J. Mulders</name></author><author><name sortKey="Goebel, Rainer" sort="Goebel, Rainer" uniqKey="Goebel R" first="Rainer" last="Goebel">Rainer Goebel</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2013">2013</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.02.002</idno><idno type="RBID">pubmed:23500111</idno><idno type="pmid">23500111</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000997</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000997</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">000814</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Roughness perception of unfamiliar dot pattern textures.</title><author><name sortKey="Eck, Judith" sort="Eck, Judith" uniqKey="Eck J" first="Judith" last="Eck">Judith Eck</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Maastricht University, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands. judith.eck@maastrichtuniversity.nl</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country><wicri:regionArea>Maastricht University, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6229 ER Maastricht</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>6229 ER Maastricht</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kaas, Amanda L" sort="Kaas, Amanda L" uniqKey="Kaas A" first="Amanda L" last="Kaas">Amanda L. Kaas</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mulders, Joost L J" sort="Mulders, Joost L J" uniqKey="Mulders J" first="Joost L J" last="Mulders">Joost L J. Mulders</name></author><author><name sortKey="Goebel, Rainer" sort="Goebel, Rainer" uniqKey="Goebel R" first="Rainer" last="Goebel">Rainer Goebel</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Acta psychologica</title><idno type="eISSN">1873-6297</idno><imprint><date when="2013" type="published">2013</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Models, Psychological</term><term>Pattern Recognition, Physiological (physiology)</term><term>Recognition (Psychology) (physiology)</term><term>Surface Properties</term><term>Touch (physiology)</term><term>Touch Perception (physiology)</term><term>Visual Perception (physiology)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Pattern Recognition, Physiological</term><term>Recognition (Psychology)</term><term>Touch</term><term>Touch Perception</term><term>Visual Perception</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Models, Psychological</term><term>Surface Properties</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Both vision and touch yield comparable results in terms of roughness estimation of familiar textures as was shown in earlier studies. To our knowledge, no research has been conducted on the effect of sensory familiarity with the stimulus material on roughness estimation of unfamiliar textures. The influence of sensory modality and familiarity on roughness perception of dot pattern textures was investigated in a series of five experiments. Participants estimated the roughness of textures varying in mean center-to-center dot spacing in experimental conditions providing visual, haptic and visual-haptic combined information. The findings indicate that roughness perception of unfamiliar dot pattern textures is well described by a bi-exponential function of inter-dot spacing, regardless of the sensory modality used. However, sensory modality appears to affect the maximum of the psychophysical roughness function, with visually perceived roughness peaking for a smaller inter-dot spacing than haptic roughness. We propose that this might be due to the better spatial acuity of the visual modality. Individuals appeared to use different visual roughness estimation strategies depending on their first sensory experience (visual vs. haptic) with the stimulus material, primarily in an experimental context which required the combination of visual and haptic information in a single bimodal roughness estimate. Furthermore, the similarity of findings in experimental settings using real and virtual visual textures indicates the suitability of the experimental setup for neuroimaging studies, creating a more direct link between behavioral and neuroimaging results.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">23500111</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2013</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>15</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2013</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>26</Day></DateCompleted><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1873-6297</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>143</Volume><Issue>1</Issue><PubDate><Year>2013</Year><Month>May</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Acta psychologica</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Acta Psychol (Amst)</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Roughness perception of unfamiliar dot pattern textures.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>20-34</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.02.002</ELocationID><ELocationID EIdType="pii" ValidYN="Y">S0001-6918(13)00041-3</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Both vision and touch yield comparable results in terms of roughness estimation of familiar textures as was shown in earlier studies. To our knowledge, no research has been conducted on the effect of sensory familiarity with the stimulus material on roughness estimation of unfamiliar textures. The influence of sensory modality and familiarity on roughness perception of dot pattern textures was investigated in a series of five experiments. Participants estimated the roughness of textures varying in mean center-to-center dot spacing in experimental conditions providing visual, haptic and visual-haptic combined information. The findings indicate that roughness perception of unfamiliar dot pattern textures is well described by a bi-exponential function of inter-dot spacing, regardless of the sensory modality used. However, sensory modality appears to affect the maximum of the psychophysical roughness function, with visually perceived roughness peaking for a smaller inter-dot spacing than haptic roughness. We propose that this might be due to the better spatial acuity of the visual modality. Individuals appeared to use different visual roughness estimation strategies depending on their first sensory experience (visual vs. haptic) with the stimulus material, primarily in an experimental context which required the combination of visual and haptic information in a single bimodal roughness estimate. Furthermore, the similarity of findings in experimental settings using real and virtual visual textures indicates the suitability of the experimental setup for neuroimaging studies, creating a more direct link between behavioral and neuroimaging results.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Eck</LastName><ForeName>Judith</ForeName><Initials>J</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Maastricht University, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands. judith.eck@maastrichtuniversity.nl</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Kaas</LastName><ForeName>Amanda L</ForeName><Initials>AL</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Mulders</LastName><ForeName>Joost L J</ForeName><Initials>JL</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Goebel</LastName><ForeName>Rainer</ForeName><Initials>R</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2013</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>20</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Netherlands</Country><MedlineTA>Acta Psychol (Amst)</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0370366</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0001-6918</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000328">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005260">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008297">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008960">Models, Psychological</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D046709">Pattern Recognition, Physiological</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D021641">Recognition (Psychology)</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D013499">Surface Properties</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D014110">Touch</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D055698">Touch Perception</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D014796">Visual Perception</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2012</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>13</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised"><Year>2013</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>10</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2013</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>2</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="aheadofprint"><Year>2013</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>20</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2013</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>19</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2013</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>19</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2013</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>27</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pii">S0001-6918(13)00041-3</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.02.002</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23500111</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Pays-Bas</li></country></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Goebel, Rainer" sort="Goebel, Rainer" uniqKey="Goebel R" first="Rainer" last="Goebel">Rainer Goebel</name><name sortKey="Kaas, Amanda L" sort="Kaas, Amanda L" uniqKey="Kaas A" first="Amanda L" last="Kaas">Amanda L. Kaas</name><name sortKey="Mulders, Joost L J" sort="Mulders, Joost L J" uniqKey="Mulders J" first="Joost L J" last="Mulders">Joost L J. Mulders</name></noCountry><country name="Pays-Bas"><noRegion><name sortKey="Eck, Judith" sort="Eck, Judith" uniqKey="Eck J" first="Judith" last="Eck">Judith Eck</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000814 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 000814 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:23500111
|texte= Roughness perception of unfamiliar dot pattern textures.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:23500111" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |